Fermat's Last Theorem
by aoum, Mar 7, 2025, 12:20 AM
Fermat’s Last Theorem: The Greatest Mathematical Mystery
For centuries, Fermat’s Last Theorem stood as one of the greatest unsolved problems in mathematics. A deceptively simple statement, it challenged the brightest minds until it was finally proven in 1994. In this blog, we explore the history, significance, and eventual proof of this legendary theorem.
1. What Is Fermat’s Last Theorem?
Fermat’s Last Theorem states that there are no whole number solutions to the equation:
![\[
x^n + y^n = z^n
\]](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/f/0/4f000ceaf48898b50c686079b5c18c89008ec98e.png)
for any integer
, where
are positive integers.
This extends the well-known Pythagorean theorem:

which has infinitely many integer solutions, known as Pythagorean triples, such as:
![\[
(3,4,5), \quad (5,12,13), \quad (8,15,17).
\]](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/e/b/7eb478e04f05614aca2159e9c2807889a2f15c67.png)
However, Fermat claimed that for any exponent
, no such integer solutions exist.
2. The History of the Theorem
The theorem was first stated by Pierre de Fermat in the margin of his copy of Arithmetica by Diophantus. Next to it, he wrote:
“I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this margin is too narrow to contain.”
Despite this bold claim, no valid proof was found for over 350 years. It became one of the most famous unsolved problems in number theory.
3. Special Cases and Partial Results
Before the full proof was discovered, mathematicians managed to prove the theorem for specific values of
:
Despite these advances, a proof for all integers
remained elusive.
4. The Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem
The breakthrough came in 1994 when British mathematician Andrew Wiles successfully proved Fermat’s Last Theorem. His proof linked the theorem to the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, which relates elliptic curves and modular forms.
Key Steps in Wiles’ Proof:
Thus, Wiles indirectly proved Fermat’s Last Theorem by proving a more general and powerful result in modern mathematics.
Mathematical Outline of the Proof:
1. Suppose there exists a solution
to:
![\[
x^n + y^n = z^n, \quad n > 2.
\]](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/7/8/478469d0d9839079e24167137540f4595b9a1e90.png)
2. Gerhard Frey observed that this would correspond to an elliptic curve:
![\[
E: y^2 = x(x - a^n)(x + b^n).
\]](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/5/9/159132121b987d2d00c870d721d794b16ccd7510.png)
3. This curve, now called the Frey Curve, would have unusual properties that make it non-modular.
4. Using Ribet’s Theorem (1986), Wiles showed that if the Frey Curve existed, it would contradict the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, which asserts that every elliptic curve is modular.
5. Wiles then proved a special case of the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, completing the proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem.
The proof introduced deep mathematical tools, including:
Initially, Wiles’ proof contained a gap, but with the help of his former student Richard Taylor, the error was corrected in 1995. His work earned him the Abel Prize and worldwide recognition.
5. Why Is Fermat’s Last Theorem Important?
Though Fermat’s Last Theorem itself may seem like a simple number theory problem, its proof led to major developments in modern mathematics:
6. Fun Facts About Fermat’s Last Theorem
7. Conclusion: A Theorem for the Ages
Fermat’s Last Theorem is a perfect example of how mathematics can be both beautiful and mysterious. What started as a note in the margin of a book led to a mathematical revolution centuries later. Thanks to Andrew Wiles, this ancient mystery is now solved, but the methods used in the proof continue to inspire mathematicians today.
References
For centuries, Fermat’s Last Theorem stood as one of the greatest unsolved problems in mathematics. A deceptively simple statement, it challenged the brightest minds until it was finally proven in 1994. In this blog, we explore the history, significance, and eventual proof of this legendary theorem.

1. What Is Fermat’s Last Theorem?
Fermat’s Last Theorem states that there are no whole number solutions to the equation:
![\[
x^n + y^n = z^n
\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/f/0/4f000ceaf48898b50c686079b5c18c89008ec98e.png)
for any integer


This extends the well-known Pythagorean theorem:

which has infinitely many integer solutions, known as Pythagorean triples, such as:
![\[
(3,4,5), \quad (5,12,13), \quad (8,15,17).
\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/e/b/7eb478e04f05614aca2159e9c2807889a2f15c67.png)
However, Fermat claimed that for any exponent

2. The History of the Theorem
The theorem was first stated by Pierre de Fermat in the margin of his copy of Arithmetica by Diophantus. Next to it, he wrote:
“I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this margin is too narrow to contain.”
Despite this bold claim, no valid proof was found for over 350 years. It became one of the most famous unsolved problems in number theory.
3. Special Cases and Partial Results
Before the full proof was discovered, mathematicians managed to prove the theorem for specific values of

- Leonhard Euler (18th century): Proved the case for
using factorization techniques.
- Adrien-Marie Legendre & Peter Dirichlet (19th century): Proved the case for
.
- Gabriel Lamé (19th century): Proved the case for
.
- Ernst Kummer (19th century): Introduced the concept of ideal numbers and proved the theorem for a special class of primes called regular primes.
Despite these advances, a proof for all integers

4. The Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem
The breakthrough came in 1994 when British mathematician Andrew Wiles successfully proved Fermat’s Last Theorem. His proof linked the theorem to the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, which relates elliptic curves and modular forms.
Key Steps in Wiles’ Proof:
- Wiles sought to prove a special case of the Taniyama-Shimura-Weil Conjecture, which states that every elliptic curve is modular.
- He showed that if Fermat’s Last Theorem were false, then a certain type of elliptic curve would exist, known as a Frey Curve.
- Using Ribet’s Theorem, he proved that such a curve could not be modular.
- By applying modularity lifting theorems and tools from algebraic geometry, Wiles showed that such a curve could not exist.
- This contradiction meant that the original assumption (that there exists a solution to
for
) must be false.
Thus, Wiles indirectly proved Fermat’s Last Theorem by proving a more general and powerful result in modern mathematics.
Mathematical Outline of the Proof:
1. Suppose there exists a solution

![\[
x^n + y^n = z^n, \quad n > 2.
\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/7/8/478469d0d9839079e24167137540f4595b9a1e90.png)
2. Gerhard Frey observed that this would correspond to an elliptic curve:
![\[
E: y^2 = x(x - a^n)(x + b^n).
\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/5/9/159132121b987d2d00c870d721d794b16ccd7510.png)
3. This curve, now called the Frey Curve, would have unusual properties that make it non-modular.
4. Using Ribet’s Theorem (1986), Wiles showed that if the Frey Curve existed, it would contradict the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, which asserts that every elliptic curve is modular.
5. Wiles then proved a special case of the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, completing the proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem.
The proof introduced deep mathematical tools, including:
Initially, Wiles’ proof contained a gap, but with the help of his former student Richard Taylor, the error was corrected in 1995. His work earned him the Abel Prize and worldwide recognition.
5. Why Is Fermat’s Last Theorem Important?
Though Fermat’s Last Theorem itself may seem like a simple number theory problem, its proof led to major developments in modern mathematics:
- It established deep connections between algebra, geometry, and number theory.
- It led to the proof of the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, a fundamental result in modern mathematics.
- It introduced new tools that have since been applied to other mathematical breakthroughs.
- It paved the way for progress in modularity lifting theorems and the study of automorphic forms.
6. Fun Facts About Fermat’s Last Theorem
- Despite his famous claim, most mathematicians believe that Fermat did not actually have a complete proof for all cases.
- The theorem is often featured in popular culture, including books like Fermat’s Enigma by Simon Singh.
- The problem remained unsolved for 358 years, making it one of the longest-standing open problems in mathematics.
- Wiles' proof was over 100 pages long and took seven years of isolated work.
- The proof required tools from algebraic geometry, modular forms, and Galois representations—fields that did not exist in Fermat's time.
7. Conclusion: A Theorem for the Ages
Fermat’s Last Theorem is a perfect example of how mathematics can be both beautiful and mysterious. What started as a note in the margin of a book led to a mathematical revolution centuries later. Thanks to Andrew Wiles, this ancient mystery is now solved, but the methods used in the proof continue to inspire mathematicians today.
References
- AoPS: Fermat's Last Theorem
- Wikipedia: Fermat's Last Theorem
- Singh, Simon. Fermat’s Enigma (1997).
- Wiles, Andrew. Modular Elliptic Curves and Fermat’s Last Theorem (1995).
- Ribet, K. On modular representations of Gal(Q̄/Q) and Fermat’s Last Theorem (1986).