Fermat's Last Theorem

by aoum, Mar 7, 2025, 12:20 AM

Fermat’s Last Theorem: The Greatest Mathematical Mystery

For centuries, Fermat’s Last Theorem stood as one of the greatest unsolved problems in mathematics. A deceptively simple statement, it challenged the brightest minds until it was finally proven in 1994. In this blog, we explore the history, significance, and eventual proof of this legendary theorem.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/47/Diophantus-II-8-Fermat.jpg/220px-Diophantus-II-8-Fermat.jpg


1. What Is Fermat’s Last Theorem?

Fermat’s Last Theorem states that there are no whole number solutions to the equation:

\[
x^n + y^n = z^n
\]
for any integer \( n > 2 \), where \( x, y, z \) are positive integers.

This extends the well-known Pythagorean theorem:

$$
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
$$
which has infinitely many integer solutions, known as Pythagorean triples, such as:

\[
(3,4,5), \quad (5,12,13), \quad (8,15,17).
\]
However, Fermat claimed that for any exponent \( n > 2 \), no such integer solutions exist.

2. The History of the Theorem

The theorem was first stated by Pierre de Fermat in the margin of his copy of Arithmetica by Diophantus. Next to it, he wrote:

“I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this margin is too narrow to contain.”

Despite this bold claim, no valid proof was found for over 350 years. It became one of the most famous unsolved problems in number theory.

3. Special Cases and Partial Results

Before the full proof was discovered, mathematicians managed to prove the theorem for specific values of \( n \):
  • Leonhard Euler (18th century): Proved the case for \( n = 3 \) using factorization techniques.
  • Adrien-Marie Legendre & Peter Dirichlet (19th century): Proved the case for \( n = 5 \).
  • Gabriel Lamé (19th century): Proved the case for \( n = 7 \).
  • Ernst Kummer (19th century): Introduced the concept of ideal numbers and proved the theorem for a special class of primes called regular primes.

Despite these advances, a proof for all integers \( n > 2 \) remained elusive.

4. The Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem

The breakthrough came in 1994 when British mathematician Andrew Wiles successfully proved Fermat’s Last Theorem. His proof linked the theorem to the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, which relates elliptic curves and modular forms.

Key Steps in Wiles’ Proof:
  • Wiles sought to prove a special case of the Taniyama-Shimura-Weil Conjecture, which states that every elliptic curve is modular.
  • He showed that if Fermat’s Last Theorem were false, then a certain type of elliptic curve would exist, known as a Frey Curve.
  • Using Ribet’s Theorem, he proved that such a curve could not be modular.
  • By applying modularity lifting theorems and tools from algebraic geometry, Wiles showed that such a curve could not exist.
  • This contradiction meant that the original assumption (that there exists a solution to \( x^n + y^n = z^n \) for \( n > 2 \)) must be false.

Thus, Wiles indirectly proved Fermat’s Last Theorem by proving a more general and powerful result in modern mathematics.

Mathematical Outline of the Proof:

1. Suppose there exists a solution \( (x, y, z, n) \) to:

\[
x^n + y^n = z^n, \quad n > 2.
\]
2. Gerhard Frey observed that this would correspond to an elliptic curve:

\[
E: y^2 = x(x - a^n)(x + b^n).
\]
3. This curve, now called the Frey Curve, would have unusual properties that make it non-modular.

4. Using Ribet’s Theorem (1986), Wiles showed that if the Frey Curve existed, it would contradict the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, which asserts that every elliptic curve is modular.

5. Wiles then proved a special case of the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, completing the proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem.

The proof introduced deep mathematical tools, including:

Initially, Wiles’ proof contained a gap, but with the help of his former student Richard Taylor, the error was corrected in 1995. His work earned him the Abel Prize and worldwide recognition.

5. Why Is Fermat’s Last Theorem Important?

Though Fermat’s Last Theorem itself may seem like a simple number theory problem, its proof led to major developments in modern mathematics:
  • It established deep connections between algebra, geometry, and number theory.
  • It led to the proof of the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture, a fundamental result in modern mathematics.
  • It introduced new tools that have since been applied to other mathematical breakthroughs.
  • It paved the way for progress in modularity lifting theorems and the study of automorphic forms.

6. Fun Facts About Fermat’s Last Theorem
  • Despite his famous claim, most mathematicians believe that Fermat did not actually have a complete proof for all cases.
  • The theorem is often featured in popular culture, including books like Fermat’s Enigma by Simon Singh.
  • The problem remained unsolved for 358 years, making it one of the longest-standing open problems in mathematics.
  • Wiles' proof was over 100 pages long and took seven years of isolated work.
  • The proof required tools from algebraic geometry, modular forms, and Galois representations—fields that did not exist in Fermat's time.

7. Conclusion: A Theorem for the Ages

Fermat’s Last Theorem is a perfect example of how mathematics can be both beautiful and mysterious. What started as a note in the margin of a book led to a mathematical revolution centuries later. Thanks to Andrew Wiles, this ancient mystery is now solved, but the methods used in the proof continue to inspire mathematicians today.

References

Comment

J
U VIEW ATTACHMENTS T PREVIEW J CLOSE PREVIEW rREFRESH
J

4 Comments

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Yo thats crazy. In school we just learned about fermats last theorem

by rayliu985, Mar 7, 2025, 12:39 AM

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Thanks. There are many interesting math topics out there. I hope to share them with you all.

by aoum, Mar 7, 2025, 12:51 AM

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Isn't it wonderful to see such simple problems have such deep proofs? Fermat's Last Theorem isn't complicated, and it has such deep proof that many people probably wouldn't understand, including me.

by HacheB2031, Mar 7, 2025, 5:19 AM

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
I hope I can make these proofs easy to understand.

by aoum, Mar 7, 2025, 11:36 PM

Fun with math!

avatar

aoum
Archives
+ March 2025
Shouts
Submit
  • cool blog and good content but it looks eerily similar to chatgpt

    by SirAppel, Today at 1:28 AM

  • 1,000 views!

    by aoum, Today at 12:25 AM

  • Excellent blog. Contribute?

    by zhenghua, Apr 10, 2025, 1:27 AM

  • Are you asking to contribute or to be notified whenever a post is published?

    by aoum, Apr 10, 2025, 12:20 AM

  • nice blog! love the dedication c:
    can i have contrib to be notified whenever you post?

    by akliu, Apr 10, 2025, 12:08 AM

  • WOAH I JUST CAME HERE, CSS IS CRAZY

    by HacheB2031, Apr 8, 2025, 5:05 AM

  • Thanks! I'm happy to hear that! How is the new CSS? If you don't like it, I can go back.

    by aoum, Apr 8, 2025, 12:42 AM

  • This is such a cool blog! Just a suggestion, but I feel like it would look a bit better if the entries were wider. They're really skinny right now, which makes the posts seem a lot longer.

    by Catcumber, Apr 4, 2025, 11:16 PM

  • The first few posts for April are out!

    by aoum, Apr 1, 2025, 11:51 PM

  • Sure! I understand that it would be quite a bit to take in.

    by aoum, Apr 1, 2025, 11:08 PM

  • No, but it is a lot to take in. Also, could you do the Gamma Function next?

    by HacheB2031, Apr 1, 2025, 3:04 AM

  • Am I going too fast? Would you like me to slow down?

    by aoum, Mar 31, 2025, 11:34 PM

  • Seriously, how do you make these so fast???

    by HacheB2031, Mar 31, 2025, 6:45 AM

  • I am now able to make clickable images in my posts! :)

    by aoum, Mar 29, 2025, 10:42 PM

  • Am I doing enough? Are you all expecting more from me?

    by aoum, Mar 29, 2025, 12:31 AM

56 shouts
Contributors
Tags
Problem of the Day
Fractals
combinatorics
geometry
poll
Collatz Conjecture
Factorials
graph theory
Millennium Prize Problems
pi
Riemann Hypothesis
Sir Issac Newton
AMC
calculus
Chudnovsky Algorithm
Exponents
Gauss-Legendre Algorithm
Goldbach Conjecture
infinity
Koch snowflake
MAA
Mandelbrot Set
Mastering AMC 1012
MATHCOUNTS
Matroids
Nilakantha Series
number theory
P vs NP Problem
P-adic Analysis
Polynomials
probability
Ramsey Theory
algebra
Algorithmic Applications
AMC 10
AMC 8
angle bisector theorem
Angle trisection
Applications in Various Fields
Arc Sine Formula
Archimedes Method
Banach-Tarski Paradox
Basel Problem
Basic Reproduction Number
Bayes Theorem
Bell Curve
Bernoulli numbers
Bertrand s Box Paradox
binomial theorem
Birthday Attack
Birthday Problem
buffon s needle
Cantor s Infinite Sets
cardinality
catalan numbers
Circumference
Coin Rotation Paradox
computer science
conditional probability
conic sections
Conjectures
Cryptography
Cyclic Numbers
Cyclic Sieving Phenomenon
Different Sizes of Infinity
Diophantinve Approximation
Dirichlets Approximation
Diseases
Double Factorials
Drake Equation
epidemiology
euclidean geometry
Euler s Formula for Polyhedra
Euler s Identity
Euler s totient function
Euler-Lagrange Equation
Fermat s Factoring Method
fermat s last theorem
Fibonacci sequence
finite
four color theorem
Fractals and Chaos Theory
free books
Gamma function
Golden Ratio
Graham s Number
Graph Minor Theorem
gravity
Greedoids
Gregory-Liebniz Series
Hailstone Problem
Heron s Formula
Hilbert s Hotel
Hodge Conjecture
ideal gas law
Inclusion-exclusion
infinite
Irrational numbers
Kruskals Tree Theorem
Law of Force and Acceleration
legendre s theorem
Leibniz Formula
logarithms
logic
Mastering AMC 8
Menger Sponge
Minkowskis Theorem
modular arithmetic
Multinomial Theorem
Multiples of 24
National Science Bowl
Newton s First Law of Motion
Newton s Second Law of Motion
Newton s Third Law of Motion
normal distribution
Parabolas
Paradox
paradoxes
Penrose Tilings
physical chemistry
pie
pigeonhole principle
Price s Equation
prime numbers
primes
Ptolemys Theorem
Pythagorean Theorem
Python
Ramsey s Theorem
recursion
Reproduction Rate of Diseases
Sequences
Sequences of Binomial Type
Sets
Sierpinski Triangle
Sierpiski Carpet
Sierpiski Triangle
Simon s Factoring Trick
statistics
The Birthday Problem
The Book of Formulas
The HalesJewett Theorem
The Law of Action and Reaction
The Law of Inertia
The Lost Boarding Pass Problem
thermodynamics
Topological Insights
triangle inequality
trigonometry
twin prime conjecture
Umbral Calculus
Van der Waerdens Theorem
venn diagram
Wallis Product
Zeno s Paradoxes
About Owner
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: Nov 2, 2024
Blog Stats
  • Blog created: Mar 1, 2025
  • Total entries: 96
  • Total visits: 1006
  • Total comments: 26
Search Blog
a