ka April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.
WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.
Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!
Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29
Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Intermediate: Grades 8-12
Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
The school A has m1 boys and m2 girls, and ,the school B has n1 boys and n2 girls. Each school is represented by one team formed by p students,boys and girls. If f(k) is the number of cases for which,the twice schools has,togheter k girls, fund f(k) and the valute of k, for which f(k) is maximum.
Let and be positive integers with . In a group of people, each one or always
speak the truth or always lie. Arnaldo can ask questions for any of these people
provided these questions are of the type: “In set , what is the parity of people who speak to
true? ”, where is a subset of size of the set of people. The answer can only
be “” or “”.
a) For which values of and is it possible to determine which people speak the truth and
which people always lie?
b) What is the minimum number of questions required to determine which people
speak the truth and which people always lie, when that number is finite?
Is there a way to do this without drawing obscure auxiliary lines? (the auxiliary lines might not be obscure I might just be calling them obscure)
For example I tried rotating triangle MBC 80 degrees around point C (so the BC line segment would now lie on segment AC) but I couldn't get any results. Any help would be appreciated!
Ok, so I genuinely dislike inequalities. I never can find the motivation behind why random am-gm is done behind specific parts of the inequality; tbh it might (prolly is) just be a skill issue; can someone explain how to do this and also give inequality practice at this lvl
A sequence obeys the recurrence for any integers . Additionally, and . Let can be expressed as for two relatively prime positive integers and . Determine the value of .
I technically have a solution (I didn't come up with it, it was the official solution) but it seems unintuitive. Can someone find a sol/explain to me how they got to it? (like why did u do the steps that u did) sorry if this seems a lil vague
Let be a rhombus, and E be the midpoint of side CD. Let F be a point on BE such that
AF⊥BF. If the measure of ∠ADC is 56 degrees, find the measure of ∠EFC.
As Diarmuid said, it can easily be seen that if is not identically zero, it is surjective (by varying ). Bijectivity is non-essential, except at , which we will now prove. Suppose for some . Then we have , a contradiction since takes every real value.
Substituting for gives that , and therefore that .
Now fix and put . We get that and therefore (by bijectivity at 0) and .
Taking y=z=0 in (1) we get
Taking x=0 in (2) we get f(0)=0
Taking x=0 and y=z=x in (1) we get
Taking y=z=x in (1) we get,
Now using the fact that we get
Comparing (4) and (5) we get, where
or, considering x not equal to 0.
Substituting this back in (3) we get
or,
From this we get that c=0 or 1 and consequently or for all real x
Somebody, please check my solution:
Let be the assertion for the functional equation.
Which is the Cauchy's functional equation and has solutions
from here we can prove as Sayantan(previous poster) did and this gives us solutions
From the equation marked with a star we may also proceed as follows:
We can prove is injective except the solution
Now
As the function is injective for the non-zero solutions, also ,
We have,
Hence the solution
It's easy and nice function.Here my solution:
Let be the assertion of the function.
1) .
2) and .It's easy to see that is zero function or bijective fuction.In least identity we take so by bijectivite we get and so .
3) From we have : . But we see that isn't solution.
Answers:
1)
2)
We claim that or are the only two solutions. It is easy to check that these 2 work. We now show that these are the only 2 solutions. Set to get . Set to get . Thus the equation now takes the form . Set to get . Set in to get . Set in to get (according to the sign of , we choose the sign of to ensure that , and hence either , or . We do not consider .) In this equation, set to get or , depending on whether or . Since this is true for all (or ), either or is a constant on one of these 2 domains. In the second case, we can use and hence easily get .
So now assume . This is our result . Now, substituting in and using we get .
Hence . But setting in (and using ) gives . Thus, . Then using gives . (We can check that this is true for the case as well).
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Wizard_32, Dec 27, 2017, 8:03 AM Reason: errrrrrrrr
clearly, if is constant then it's zero so suppose that it's not constant
let be the assertion of the equation. so
subbose that for some and compare with is bejective
now ,
so
Proof:
Let denote the given assertion. (Holds even when )
If
Plugging this back into our original equation.
After checking we see that both values of work.
Hence .
Oh, I really overcomplicated it :O But yeyy, I solved an INMO fe!
Let denote the assertion.
Then
And
Also Now we show that is injective at So let So Assuming is non constant, we get Then
Not possible, hence is injective at
Moreover,
Note that
Actually, we don't need the following claim, but I found it too good to not add.
Claim: Proof: Alternate proof: Using subjectivity,
Now, fix We carry and choose such that Then
Take in So, we get
Hence the solutions are
Proof:
Let denote the assertion: yields yields
Furthermore (1) yields
However notice that from (1) we have:
Thus, since is a constant, we have that yields
Thus can only be equal to or .QED
And we are done!
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by F10tothepowerof34, Apr 23, 2023, 8:02 PM
Very similar to IMO 1992/2. We use pretty much the same idea here too!
Solution. The answers are and . All of them work. Denote the assertion to the functional equation by . We will now proceed towards to the other direction.
Its clear that is the only constant. reveals . If attains at any non-zero constant , then would yield . Henceforth, assume that is non-zero everywhere except .
gives . gives us and finally gives us that is bijective and an involution. Here's the nice part, gives for all real and . This condition is well-known over and can be extended to full a Cauchy. would give . So, for positive values of domain which due to Cauchy means that is strictly increasing. Since is strictly increasing and is additive, for some real constant . Just checking it once, we're done.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by SatisfiedMagma, Apr 28, 2023, 9:21 AM Reason: error
Claim 1:
Proof: trivial
Claim 2:
Proof: Putting
Claim 3: is an involution
Proof: Putting
But is surjective in
Therefore
Claim 3: is odd
Proof: Putting in original equation
We get now since is surjective therefore is also odd.
Claim 4: f(x)=x
Proof: taking
We get for all positive real x. But since is odd therfore we can extend this to the negative numbers as well and hence we are done.
How was this INMO P wth. Just tried out random stuffs and got my solution. . .
Comparing with gives us , so is odd.
Now, consider where .
Then,
Clearly is a solution, then assume .
This gives out , and thus is injective. . . .
Now, .
So, is involutive. [From ]
Or, .
Overall, we get solutions, and , both seem to work.
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by SouradipClash_03, Jan 5, 2024, 5:40 PM
We claim the only solutions are and . Clearly, they satisfy the given equation. We now prove these are the only solutions.
Since satisfies, the equation, assume is not identically zero, and let denote the assertion . .
Note that we can choose z such that , and therefore can represent any real, say .
Therefore we have , i.e. is an involution and therefore bijective.
Now .
Now, (Denote this by (1))
Now note that is odd, as .
Therefore (1) simplifies as .
Now since this holds for all real and , it holds for all positive reals , so we assume , and let .
Then we have , and since we are assuming f to be bounded (in the positive reals) , this satisfies Cauchy's Functional Equation, i.e. we get positive real x.
Also, for positive , so for all nonzero x, and as , we get .
Substituting into the original equation, we get and as we have , i.e. .
Therefore, and are the only solutions.
First notice that obviously works, now assume that is nonzero for atleast one input value, say .
Now which implies that is bijective. Finally and since we know that we can conclude that and are the only solutions
Also, INMO doesn't order its problems difficulty-wise, so this being p6 (in 2005) is not a big deal
The answers are and . Let . So , and , so ,, so for or . If , we're done with this case. If , so for all ,. Let x be a negative real number, so for x negative, so we conclude that is the other case and we're done.
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by Jakjjdm, Apr 15, 2025, 7:08 PM
Let denote the main assertion. gives . gives , and gives . This means , but taking a non-zero , we get that covers all reals, which means for all , and , which means for all , which works.
Note that it is possible that there are no non-zero as considered, which means would be identically , which is the other valid function.