ka May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.
Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.
Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!
Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.
Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)
Intermediate: Grades 8-12
Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:
To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.
More specifically:
For new threads:
a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.
Examples: Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿) Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"
b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.
Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".
c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote][/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.
For answers to already existing threads:
d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve , do not answer with " is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like " is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.
e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.
To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).
The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
Source: I actually don't know whether this holds, but the application of Riemann-Hurwitz would make sense to some extent
Let be a hyperboloid of one sheet and let be another quadric that intersects the hyperboloid at the curve . Let be a point on , and let be a line through in one specific ruling of the hyperboloid. Let this line intersect again at , now define to be the line through in the opposite ruling. Similarily define . Prove that if then this is true for all initial choices of .
.
If this is true, then it gives a proof of Poncelet's porism by taking an appropriate quadric that intersects the hyperboloid and projecting down to the xz-plane, since different rulings correspond to tangents to a rectangular hyperbola in different directions, and apparently there is some nice interpretation of poncelet's porism with a ruled quadric surface according to YaoAOPS
Let be a real polynomial of degree that has only simple roots. It is possible to determine a positive quantity so that for every pair of positive real numbers , with , every transformed polynomial of the form has exactly or sign variations.
Ok so there's been no geo marathon here for more than 2 years,so lets start one,rules remain same.
1st problem.
Let be a cyclic quadrilateral with and let and be the feet of altitudes from to the lines and ,.Prove bisects .
P.s._eeezy ,try without ss line.
Partitioning coprime integers to arithmetic sequences
sevket123
Nan hour ago
by quacksaysduck
Source: 2025 Turkey EGMO TST P3
For a positive integer , let be the set of positive integers that do not exceed and are coprime to . Define as the smallest positive integer that allows to be partitioned into disjoint subsets, each forming an arithmetic progression.
Prove that there exist infinitely many pairs satisfying ,, and .
As Diarmuid said, it can easily be seen that if is not identically zero, it is surjective (by varying ). Bijectivity is non-essential, except at , which we will now prove. Suppose for some . Then we have , a contradiction since takes every real value.
Substituting for gives that , and therefore that .
Now fix and put . We get that and therefore (by bijectivity at 0) and .
Taking y=z=0 in (1) we get
Taking x=0 in (2) we get f(0)=0
Taking x=0 and y=z=x in (1) we get
Taking y=z=x in (1) we get,
Now using the fact that we get
Comparing (4) and (5) we get, where
or, considering x not equal to 0.
Substituting this back in (3) we get
or,
From this we get that c=0 or 1 and consequently or for all real x
Somebody, please check my solution:
Let be the assertion for the functional equation.
Which is the Cauchy's functional equation and has solutions
from here we can prove as Sayantan(previous poster) did and this gives us solutions
From the equation marked with a star we may also proceed as follows:
We can prove is injective except the solution
Now
As the function is injective for the non-zero solutions, also ,
We have,
Hence the solution
It's easy and nice function.Here my solution:
Let be the assertion of the function.
1) .
2) and .It's easy to see that is zero function or bijective fuction.In least identity we take so by bijectivite we get and so .
3) From we have : . But we see that isn't solution.
Answers:
1)
2)
We claim that or are the only two solutions. It is easy to check that these 2 work. We now show that these are the only 2 solutions. Set to get . Set to get . Thus the equation now takes the form . Set to get . Set in to get . Set in to get (according to the sign of , we choose the sign of to ensure that , and hence either , or . We do not consider .) In this equation, set to get or , depending on whether or . Since this is true for all (or ), either or is a constant on one of these 2 domains. In the second case, we can use and hence easily get .
So now assume . This is our result . Now, substituting in and using we get .
Hence . But setting in (and using ) gives . Thus, . Then using gives . (We can check that this is true for the case as well).
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Wizard_32, Dec 27, 2017, 8:03 AM Reason: errrrrrrrr
clearly, if is constant then it's zero so suppose that it's not constant
let be the assertion of the equation. so
subbose that for some and compare with is bejective
now ,
so
Proof:
Let denote the given assertion. (Holds even when )
If
Plugging this back into our original equation.
After checking we see that both values of work.
Hence .
Oh, I really overcomplicated it :O But yeyy, I solved an INMO fe!
Let denote the assertion.
Then
And
Also Now we show that is injective at So let So Assuming is non constant, we get Then
Not possible, hence is injective at
Moreover,
Note that
Actually, we don't need the following claim, but I found it too good to not add.
Claim: Proof: Alternate proof: Using subjectivity,
Now, fix We carry and choose such that Then
Take in So, we get
Hence the solutions are
Proof:
Let denote the assertion: yields yields
Furthermore (1) yields
However notice that from (1) we have:
Thus, since is a constant, we have that yields
Thus can only be equal to or .QED
And we are done!
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by F10tothepowerof34, Apr 23, 2023, 8:02 PM
Very similar to IMO 1992/2. We use pretty much the same idea here too!
Solution. The answers are and . All of them work. Denote the assertion to the functional equation by . We will now proceed towards to the other direction.
Its clear that is the only constant. reveals . If attains at any non-zero constant , then would yield . Henceforth, assume that is non-zero everywhere except .
gives . gives us and finally gives us that is bijective and an involution. Here's the nice part, gives for all real and . This condition is well-known over and can be extended to full a Cauchy. would give . So, for positive values of domain which due to Cauchy means that is strictly increasing. Since is strictly increasing and is additive, for some real constant . Just checking it once, we're done.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by SatisfiedMagma, Apr 28, 2023, 9:21 AM Reason: error
Claim 1:
Proof: trivial
Claim 2:
Proof: Putting
Claim 3: is an involution
Proof: Putting
But is surjective in
Therefore
Claim 3: is odd
Proof: Putting in original equation
We get now since is surjective therefore is also odd.
Claim 4: f(x)=x
Proof: taking
We get for all positive real x. But since is odd therfore we can extend this to the negative numbers as well and hence we are done.
How was this INMO P wth. Just tried out random stuffs and got my solution. . .
Comparing with gives us , so is odd.
Now, consider where .
Then,
Clearly is a solution, then assume .
This gives out , and thus is injective. . . .
Now, .
So, is involutive. [From ]
Or, .
Overall, we get solutions, and , both seem to work.
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by SouradipClash_03, Jan 5, 2024, 5:40 PM
We claim the only solutions are and . Clearly, they satisfy the given equation. We now prove these are the only solutions.
Since satisfies, the equation, assume is not identically zero, and let denote the assertion . .
Note that we can choose z such that , and therefore can represent any real, say .
Therefore we have , i.e. is an involution and therefore bijective.
Now .
Now, (Denote this by (1))
Now note that is odd, as .
Therefore (1) simplifies as .
Now since this holds for all real and , it holds for all positive reals , so we assume , and let .
Then we have , and since we are assuming f to be bounded (in the positive reals) , this satisfies Cauchy's Functional Equation, i.e. we get positive real x.
Also, for positive , so for all nonzero x, and as , we get .
Substituting into the original equation, we get and as we have , i.e. .
Therefore, and are the only solutions.
First notice that obviously works, now assume that is nonzero for atleast one input value, say .
Now which implies that is bijective. Finally and since we know that we can conclude that and are the only solutions
Also, INMO doesn't order its problems difficulty-wise, so this being p6 (in 2005) is not a big deal
The answers are and . Let . So , and , so ,, so for or . If , we're done with this case. If , so for all ,. Let x be a negative real number, so for x negative, so we conclude that is the other case and we're done.
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by Jakjjdm, Apr 15, 2025, 7:08 PM
Let denote the main assertion. gives . gives , and gives . This means , but taking a non-zero , we get that covers all reals, which means for all , and , which means for all , which works.
Note that it is possible that there are no non-zero as considered, which means would be identically , which is the other valid function.