Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.

Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.

Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

AIME Problem Series A
Thursday, May 22 - Jul 31

AIME Problem Series B
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
May 1, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
IMO ShortList 1999, algebra problem 1
orl   42
N 31 minutes ago by ihategeo_1969
Source: IMO ShortList 1999, algebra problem 1
Let $n \geq 2$ be a fixed integer. Find the least constant $C$ such the inequality

\[\sum_{i<j} x_{i}x_{j} \left(x^{2}_{i}+x^{2}_{j} \right) \leq C
\left(\sum_{i}x_{i} \right)^4\]

holds for any $x_{1}, \ldots ,x_{n} \geq 0$ (the sum on the left consists of $\binom{n}{2}$ summands). For this constant $C$, characterize the instances of equality.
42 replies
orl
Nov 13, 2004
ihategeo_1969
31 minutes ago
q(x) to be the product of all primes less than p(x)
orl   19
N 41 minutes ago by ihategeo_1969
Source: IMO Shortlist 1995, S3
For an integer $x \geq 1$, let $p(x)$ be the least prime that does not divide $x$, and define $q(x)$ to be the product of all primes less than $p(x)$. In particular, $p(1) = 2.$ For $x$ having $p(x) = 2$, define $q(x) = 1$. Consider the sequence $x_0, x_1, x_2, \ldots$ defined by $x_0 = 1$ and \[ x_{n+1} = \frac{x_n p(x_n)}{q(x_n)} \] for $n \geq 0$. Find all $n$ such that $x_n = 1995$.
19 replies
orl
Aug 10, 2008
ihategeo_1969
41 minutes ago
Interesting inequality
sealight2107   2
N an hour ago by arqady
Source: Own
Let $a,b,c>0$ such that $a+b+c=3$. Find the minimum value of:
$Q=\frac{a}{b}+\frac{b}{c}+\frac{c}{a}+\frac{1}{a^3+b^3+abc}+\frac{1}{b^3+c^3+abc}+\frac{1}{c^3+a^3+abc}$
2 replies
sealight2107
Tuesday at 4:53 PM
arqady
an hour ago
Cyclic Quads and Parallel Lines
gracemoon124   16
N 2 hours ago by ohiorizzler1434
Source: 2015 British Mathematical Olympiad?
Let $ABCD$ be a cyclic quadrilateral. Let $F$ be the midpoint of the arc $AB$ of its circumcircle which does not contain $C$ or $D$. Let the lines $DF$ and $AC$ meet at $P$ and the lines $CF$ and $BD$ meet at $Q$. Prove that the lines $PQ$ and $AB$ are parallel.
16 replies
gracemoon124
Aug 16, 2023
ohiorizzler1434
2 hours ago
Radical Center on the Euler Line (USEMO 2020/3)
franzliszt   37
N 3 hours ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: USEMO 2020/3
Let $ABC$ be an acute triangle with circumcenter $O$ and orthocenter $H$. Let $\Gamma$ denote the circumcircle of triangle $ABC$, and $N$ the midpoint of $OH$. The tangents to $\Gamma$ at $B$ and $C$, and the line through $H$ perpendicular to line $AN$, determine a triangle whose circumcircle we denote by $\omega_A$. Define $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ similarly.
Prove that the common chords of $\omega_A$,$\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ are concurrent on line $OH$.

Proposed by Anant Mudgal
37 replies
franzliszt
Oct 24, 2020
Ilikeminecraft
3 hours ago
Functional equation with powers
tapir1729   13
N 3 hours ago by ihategeo_1969
Source: TSTST 2024, problem 6
Determine whether there exists a function $f: \mathbb{Z}_{> 0} \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}_{> 0}$ such that for all positive integers $m$ and $n$,
\[f(m+nf(m))=f(n)^m+2024! \cdot m.\]Jaedon Whyte
13 replies
tapir1729
Jun 24, 2024
ihategeo_1969
3 hours ago
Powers of a Prime
numbertheorist17   34
N 3 hours ago by KevinYang2.71
Source: USA TSTST 2014, Problem 6
Suppose we have distinct positive integers $a, b, c, d$, and an odd prime $p$ not dividing any of them, and an integer $M$ such that if one considers the infinite sequence \begin{align*}
		ca &- db \\
		ca^2 &- db^2 \\
		ca^3 &- db^3 \\
		ca^4 &- db^4 \\
&\vdots
	\end{align*} and looks at the highest power of $p$ that divides each of them, these powers are not all zero, and are all at most $M$. Prove that there exists some $T$ (which may depend on $a,b,c,d,p,M$) such that whenever $p$ divides an element of this sequence, the maximum power of $p$ that divides that element is exactly $p^T$.
34 replies
numbertheorist17
Jul 16, 2014
KevinYang2.71
3 hours ago
IMO 2018 Problem 5
orthocentre   80
N 4 hours ago by OronSH
Source: IMO 2018
Let $a_1$, $a_2$, $\ldots$ be an infinite sequence of positive integers. Suppose that there is an integer $N > 1$ such that, for each $n \geq N$, the number
$$\frac{a_1}{a_2} + \frac{a_2}{a_3} + \cdots + \frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n} + \frac{a_n}{a_1}$$is an integer. Prove that there is a positive integer $M$ such that $a_m = a_{m+1}$ for all $m \geq M$.

Proposed by Bayarmagnai Gombodorj, Mongolia
80 replies
orthocentre
Jul 10, 2018
OronSH
4 hours ago
Line passes through fixed point, as point varies
Jalil_Huseynov   60
N 4 hours ago by Rayvhs
Source: APMO 2022 P2
Let $ABC$ be a right triangle with $\angle B=90^{\circ}$. Point $D$ lies on the line $CB$ such that $B$ is between $D$ and $C$. Let $E$ be the midpoint of $AD$ and let $F$ be the seconf intersection point of the circumcircle of $\triangle ACD$ and the circumcircle of $\triangle BDE$. Prove that as $D$ varies, the line $EF$ passes through a fixed point.
60 replies
Jalil_Huseynov
May 17, 2022
Rayvhs
4 hours ago
Tangent to two circles
Mamadi   2
N 4 hours ago by A22-
Source: Own
Two circles \( w_1 \) and \( w_2 \) intersect each other at \( M \) and \( N \). The common tangent to two circles nearer to \( M \) touch \( w_1 \) and \( w_2 \) at \( A \) and \( B \) respectively. Let \( C \) and \( D \) be the reflection of \( A \) and \( B \) respectively with respect to \( M \). The circumcircle of the triangle \( DCM \) intersect circles \( w_1 \) and \( w_2 \) respectively at points \( E \) and \( F \) (both distinct from \( M \)). Show that the line \( EF \) is the second tangent to \( w_1 \) and \( w_2 \).
2 replies
Mamadi
May 2, 2025
A22-
4 hours ago
Deduction card battle
anantmudgal09   55
N 5 hours ago by deduck
Source: INMO 2021 Problem 4
A Magician and a Detective play a game. The Magician lays down cards numbered from $1$ to $52$ face-down on a table. On each move, the Detective can point to two cards and inquire if the numbers on them are consecutive. The Magician replies truthfully. After a finite number of moves, the Detective points to two cards. She wins if the numbers on these two cards are consecutive, and loses otherwise.

Prove that the Detective can guarantee a win if and only if she is allowed to ask at least $50$ questions.

Proposed by Anant Mudgal
55 replies
anantmudgal09
Mar 7, 2021
deduck
5 hours ago
Geometry
Lukariman   7
N 6 hours ago by vanstraelen
Given circle (O) and point P outside (O). From P draw tangents PA and PB to (O) with contact points A, B. On the opposite ray of ray BP, take point M. The circle circumscribing triangle APM intersects (O) at the second point D. Let H be the projection of B on AM. Prove that $\angle HDM$ = 2∠AMP.
7 replies
Lukariman
Tuesday at 12:43 PM
vanstraelen
6 hours ago
perpendicularity involving ex and incenter
Erken   20
N Yesterday at 7:48 PM by Baimukh
Source: Kazakhstan NO 2008 problem 2
Suppose that $ B_1$ is the midpoint of the arc $ AC$, containing $ B$, in the circumcircle of $ \triangle ABC$, and let $ I_b$ be the $ B$-excircle's center. Assume that the external angle bisector of $ \angle ABC$ intersects $ AC$ at $ B_2$. Prove that $ B_2I$ is perpendicular to $ B_1I_B$, where $ I$ is the incenter of $ \triangle ABC$.
20 replies
Erken
Dec 24, 2008
Baimukh
Yesterday at 7:48 PM
Isosceles Triangle Geo
oVlad   4
N Yesterday at 7:43 PM by Double07
Source: Romania Junior TST 2025 Day 1 P2
Consider the isosceles triangle $ABC$ with $\angle A>90^\circ$ and the circle $\omega$ of radius $AC$ centered at $A.$ Let $M$ be the midpoint of $AC.$ The line $BM$ intersects $\omega$ a second time at $D.$ Let $E$ be a point on $\omega$ such that $BE\perp AC.$ Let $N$ be the intersection of $DE$ and $AC.$ Prove that $AN=2\cdot AB.$
4 replies
oVlad
Apr 12, 2025
Double07
Yesterday at 7:43 PM
USAMO 2000 Problem 5
MithsApprentice   22
N Apr 28, 2025 by Maximilian113
Let $A_1A_2A_3$ be a triangle and let $\omega_1$ be a circle in its plane passing through $A_1$ and $A_2.$ Suppose there exist circles $\omega_2, \omega_3, \dots, \omega_7$ such that for $k = 2, 3, \dots, 7,$ $\omega_k$ is externally tangent to $\omega_{k-1}$ and passes through $A_k$ and $A_{k+1},$ where $A_{n+3} = A_{n}$ for all $n \ge 1$. Prove that $\omega_7 = \omega_1.$
22 replies
MithsApprentice
Oct 1, 2005
Maximilian113
Apr 28, 2025
USAMO 2000 Problem 5
G H J
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MithsApprentice
2390 posts
#1 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247
Let $A_1A_2A_3$ be a triangle and let $\omega_1$ be a circle in its plane passing through $A_1$ and $A_2.$ Suppose there exist circles $\omega_2, \omega_3, \dots, \omega_7$ such that for $k = 2, 3, \dots, 7,$ $\omega_k$ is externally tangent to $\omega_{k-1}$ and passes through $A_k$ and $A_{k+1},$ where $A_{n+3} = A_{n}$ for all $n \ge 1$. Prove that $\omega_7 = \omega_1.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MithsApprentice
2390 posts
#2 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247
When replying to the problem, I ask that you make posts for solutions and submit comments, jokes, smilies, etc. separately. Furthermore, please do not "hide" any portion of the solution. Please use LaTeX for posting solutions. Thanks.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
grobber
7849 posts
#3 • 4 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247, and 1 other user
Clearly, $\omega_i$ is determined by its center $O_i$, since we know that it passes through $A_i,A_{i+1}$. We also know that for all $i,\ O_i,A_{i+1},O_{i+1}$ are collinear. We must prove that in these conditions, $O_7=O_1$.

Suppose we prove that for all $i$, the angles $\angle OA_iO_i$ and $\angle OA_iO_{i+2}$ are equal (where $O$ is the circumcenter of $A_iA_{i+1}A_{i+2}$). The result would then follow, since $O_i\mapsto O_{i+3}$ would be an involution on the perpendicular bisector $d_i$ of $A_iA_{i+1}$, mapping a point on this line to its harmonic conjugate wrt $O$ and the intersection of the tangents in $A_i,A_{i+2}$ to the circumcircle of $A_iA_{i+1}A_{i+2}$. Since $O_1\mapsto O_4\mapsto O_7$, we must have $O_7=O_1$, as desired.

All that’s left to prove is:

Let $O_1$ be any point on $d_1$, and put $O_2=O_1A_2\cap d_2,\ O_3=O_2A_3\cap d_3$. Then, $A_1O_1,\ A_1O_3$ make equal angles with $OA_1$.

This, however, is a simple angle chase :).
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The QuattoMaster 6000
1184 posts
#4 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247
MithsApprentice wrote:
Let $ A_1A_2A_3$ be a triangle and let $ \omega_1$ be a circle in its plane passing through $ A_1$ and $ A_2.$ Suppose there exist circles $ \omega_2, \omega_3, \dots, \omega_7$ such that for $ k = 2, 3, \dots, 7,$ $ \omega_k$ is externally tangent to $ \omega_{k - 1}$ and passes through $ A_k$ and $ A_{k + 1},$ where $ A_{n + 3} = A_{n}$ for all $ n \ge 1$. Prove that $ \omega_7 = \omega_1.$
Sorry to revive an old topic, but I have a rather different solution than the one posted previously:
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
E^(pi*i)=-1
982 posts
#5 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247
Easy Coordinates
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
darij grinberg
6555 posts
#6 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247
E^(pi*i)=-1 wrote:
Since $ \omega_k$ and $ \omega_{k + 1}$ are externally tangent at $ A_{k + 1}$, we see that $ A_{k + 1}$ is the midpoint of $ O_k$ and $ O_{k + 1}$.

Why?

darij
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
E^(pi*i)=-1
982 posts
#7 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08
Oops, you're right, it's wrong. :oops:

It seems like there should be a constant ratio between radii of circles through $ A_1$ and $ A_2$ and those through $ A_2$ and $ A_3$, though . . . maybe there is a way to multiply the coordinates by these factors such that it works out?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CatalystOfNostalgia
1479 posts
#8 • 5 Y
Y by vsathiam, jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247, and 1 other user
Hmm I think you can do this with just trivial angle chasing: $ A=\angle{A_{3}A_{1}A_{2}},B=\angle{A_{1}A_{2}A_{3}},C=\angle{A_{2}A_{3}A_{1}},X=\angle{O_{1}A_{1}A_{2}}$. Then, measures of the angles $ \angle{O_{i}A_{i}A_{i+1}}$ are easy to get, we find that $ \angle{O_{7}A_{1}A_{2}}=X$, and we also need $ O_{1},O_{7}$ on the same side of $ A_{1}A_{2}$ (which follows from the fact that we need $ A_{i}$ between $ O_{i+1}$ and $ O_{i+2}$, blah.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sayantanchakraborty
505 posts
#9 • 3 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
We let the radius of the circle $\omega_i$ by $r_i$.As usual denote the side opposite to vertex $A_i$ by $a_i$ for $i=1,2,3$.
Let $O_1A_2A_1=\theta$,where $O_1$ is the centre of $\omega_1$.
By applications of sine rule we may easily deduce the following relations:

$\frac{r_1}{r_2}=-\frac{a_1}{a_3}\frac{\cos\theta}{\cos(A_2+\theta)}$

$\frac{r_2}{r_3}=-\frac{a_2}{a_1}\frac{\cos(A_2+\theta)}{\cos(A_2-A_3+\theta)}$

$\frac{r_3}{r_4}=-\frac{a_3}{a_2}\frac{\cos(A_2-A_3+\theta)}{\cos(A_1-A_2+A_3-\theta)}$

Multiplying these out we get

$\frac{r_1}{r_4}=-\frac{\cos\theta}{\cos(A_1-A_2+A_3-\theta)}$.

Similarly it is easy to observe that

$\frac{r_4}{r_7}=-\frac{\cos(A_1-A_2+A_3-\theta)}{\cos(A_1-A_2+A_3-(A_1-A_2+A_3-\theta))}=-\frac{\cos(A_1-A_2+A_3-\theta)}{\cos\theta}$.

Multiplying these equalities we obatain $r_7=r_1$.Also because $7 \equiv 1\pmod{3}$ we note that $\omega_7$ passes through $A_1$ and $A_2$.We thus obtain $\omega_7=\omega_1$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Delray
348 posts
#10 • 3 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
Hint
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6877 posts
#11 • 5 Y
Y by v4913, HamstPan38825, jhu08, rayfish, Adventure10
The idea is to keep track of the subtended arc $\widehat{A_i A_{i+1}}$ of $\omega_i$ for each $i$. To this end, let $\beta = \measuredangle A_1 A_2 A_3$, $\gamma = \measuredangle A_2 A_3 A_1$ and $\alpha = \measuredangle A_1 A_2 A_3$.



[asy] size(8cm); defaultpen(fontsize(9pt)); pair A2 = (0,0); pair O1 = (-8,0); pair O2 = (5,0); pair A1 = abs(A2-O1)*dir(285)+O1; pair A3 = abs(A2-O2)*dir(245)+O2; pair O3 = extension(O2, A3, midpoint(A1--A3), midpoint(A1--A3)+dir(A1-A3)*dir(90));

filldraw(circle(O1,abs(A1-O1)), invisible, deepgreen); filldraw(circle(O2,abs(A2-O2)), invisible, deepgreen); filldraw(circle(O3,abs(A3-O3)), invisible, deepgreen); filldraw(A1--A2--A3--cycle, invisible, red);

pair J = (0,-3.2); draw(O1--O2--O3, deepcyan+dotted);

dot("$O_1$", O1, dir(90), deepcyan); dot("$O_2$", O2, dir(90), deepcyan); dot("$O_3$", O3, dir(-90), deepcyan); dot("$A_1$", A1, dir(A1-J), red); dot("$A_2$", A2, dir(A2-J), red); dot("$A_3$", A3, dir(A3-J), red);

label("$\alpha$", A1, 2.4*dir(J-A1), red); label("$\beta$",  A2, 2*dir(J-A2), red); label("$\gamma$", A3, 2*dir(J-A3), red); [/asy]



Initially, we set $\theta = \measuredangle O_1 A_2 A_1$. Then we compute \begin{align*} 	\measuredangle O_1 A_2 A_1 &= \theta \\ 	\measuredangle O_2 A_3 A_2 &= -\beta-\theta \\ 	\measuredangle O_3 A_1 A_3 &= \beta-\gamma+\theta \\ 	\measuredangle O_4 A_2 A_1 &= (\gamma-\beta-\alpha)-\theta \\ \end{align*}and repeating the same calculation another round gives \[ \measuredangle O_7 A_2 A_1 = k-(k-\theta) = \theta \]with $k = \gamma-\beta-\alpha$. This implies $O_7 = O_1$, so $\omega_7 = \omega_1$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
GeronimoStilton
1521 posts
#12 • 3 Y
Y by Imayormaynotknowcalculus, jhu08, Mango247
I think you can do this with moving points, but here is the angle chase approach.

Let $O_i$ be the center of $\omega_i$ for $i=1,2,\dots,7$.

Observe
\[\measuredangle O_7A_1A_2=-\measuredangle A_2A_1A_3-\measuredangle A_3A_1O_6=-\measuredangle A_2A_1A_3-\measuredangle O_6A_3A_1=-\measuredangle A_2A_1A_3+\measuredangle A_1A_3A_2+\measuredangle A_2A_3O_5=\]\[-\measuredangle A_2A_1A_3+\measuredangle A_1A_3A_2+\measuredangle O_5A_2A_3=-\measuredangle A_2A_1A_3+\measuredangle A_1A_3A_2-\measuredangle A_3A_2A_1-\measuredangle A_1A_2O_4.\]A similar angle chase finishes.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
5001 posts
#13 • 2 Y
Y by centslordm, jhu08
Let $O_i$ be the center of $\omega_i$. Also let $\theta_1=\measuredangle A_1A_2A_3,\theta_2=\measuredangle A_2A_3A_1,\theta_3=\measuredangle A_3A_1A_2$. Observe that $\omega_1$ is uniquely determined by $\measuredangle O_1A_2A_1$, and $\omega_7$ is uniquely determined by $\measuredangle O_7A_2A_1$, so if we can show those are equal we're done. Now, let $\measuredangle O_1A_2A_1=\theta$. By basic angle chasing (since $O_i,A_{i+1},O_{i+1}$ are collinear), we can find:
\begin{align*}
\measuredangle O_1A_2A_1&=\theta\\
\measuredangle O_2A_3A_2&=-\theta_1-\theta\\
\measuredangle O_3A_1A_2&=\theta_1-\theta_2+\theta\\
\measuredangle O_4A_2A_1&=-\theta_1+\theta_2-\theta_3-\theta\\
\measuredangle O_5A_3A_2&=\theta_1-\theta_2+\theta_3-\theta_1+\theta\\
\measuredangle O_6A_1A_2&=-\theta_1+\theta_2-\theta_3+\theta_1-\theta_2-\theta\\
\measuredangle O_7A_2A_1&=\theta_1-\theta_2+\theta_3-\theta_1+\theta_2-\theta_3+\theta=\theta.
\end{align*}hence $\omega_1=\omega_7$ as desired. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by IAmTheHazard, May 16, 2021, 10:24 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
edfearay123
92 posts
#15 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
Interesting problem. We will aply an inversion on $\Gamma$ with center $A_1$ and ratio $R$ (it's not important). Define $Inv _{\Gamma} (\omega _i)=\Omega _i$ and $Inv _{\Gamma} (A_i)=B_i$. Note that $\Omega _i$ is a line for $i=1, 3, 4, 6, 7$ because $\omega _i$ pass through $A_1$. Also note that $\Omega _i$ and $\Omega _{i+1}$ are parallels for $i=3, 6$ because $\Omega _i$ and $\Omega _{i+1}$ are tangents in $A_1$. We want that $\Omega _1=\Omega _7$, it's sufficient to prove that $\Omega _1 \parallel \Omega _6$. Now we will use directed angles. Let $\ell=B_2B_3$:
$$\measuredangle (\Omega _1,\ell)=\measuredangle(\ell,\Omega _3)=\measuredangle(\ell,\Omega _4)=\measuredangle (\Omega _6,\ell).$$
So we have that $\Omega _1$ and $\Omega _6$ are parallels as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
asdf334
7585 posts
#16 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
Not sure if this works.

Through some manipulations we find that it suffices to show $\angle O_1A_2O_4=\angle O_7A_1O_4$, but this is true because $$\angle O_1A_2A_4=\angle O_5A_2O_2=\angle O_5A_3O_2=\angle O_3A_3O_6=\angle O_3A_1O_6=\angle O_7A_1O_4$$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
asdf334
7585 posts
#17
Y by
wait i think this works only when using directed angles (because $A_1O_4$ bisecting $\angle O_1A_1O_7$ is possible)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
awesomeming327.
1714 posts
#18
Y by
Let $O_i$ be the center of $\omega_i$. Define $\angle A_3A_1A_2=\alpha,\angle A_1A_2A_3=\beta,\angle A_2A_3A_1=\gamma.$ Define $\angle A_iA_{i+1}O_i=\angle A_{i+1}A_iO_i=\theta_i.$ It suffices to show $\theta_1=\theta_7.$ In fact, note that
\begin{align*}
\theta_2 &= 180^\circ-\beta-\theta_1 \\
\theta_3 &= 180^\circ-\gamma-\theta_2 \\
&= \beta-\gamma +\theta_1 \\
\theta_4 &= 180^\circ - \alpha -\theta_3 \\
&= 180^\circ - \alpha - \beta + \gamma - \theta_1 \\
&= 2\gamma - \theta_1
\end{align*}Note that this process is the exact same for $\theta_4\to \theta_7$, and since function $f(k)=2\gamma -k$ is cyclic with order $2$, we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8860 posts
#19
Y by
Let $\theta=\angle A_1O_1A_2$, where $O_i$ is the center of $\omega_i$. Furthermore, let $\alpha, \beta, \gamma$ be the angles of the triangle. Then, check that we have the sequence $$\theta \to 2\beta - \theta \to \theta+2\gamma-2\beta \to 2\alpha-2\gamma+2\beta-\theta=360^\circ-4\beta-\theta.$$Upon applying another sequence of three transformations, this returns the identity $\theta$, so the centers of $\omega_1$ and $\omega_7$ coincide, which suffices.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Spectator
657 posts
#20
Y by
Define $O_{k}$ as the centers of each respective circle. Let $\alpha = \angle{O_{1}A_{2}A_{1}}$.
\begin{align*}
    \angle{A_{2}O_{4}A_{1}} &= 180-\angle{A_{1}}-\angle{O_{3}A_{1}A_{3}} \\
    &= 180-\angle{A_{1}}-(180-\angle{A_{3}-\angle{A_{2}A_{3}O_{2}}}) \\
    &= \angle{A_{3}}+\angle{A_{2}A_{3}O_{2}}-\angle{A_{1}} \\
    &= \angle{A_{3}}+180-\angle{A_{2}}-\alpha-\angle{A_{1}}
\end{align*}We can apply this transformation twice to get that,
\[\angle{A_{2}A_{1}O_{7}} = \alpha\implies \omega_{1} = \omega_{7}\]
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Math4Life7
1703 posts
#21
Y by
Consider if we extend the internal tangent of all of the pairs of circles $\omega_{k-1}$ and $\omega_k$ for $k = 2, 3, \dots, 8$. Name these $\ell_1, \ell_2, \dots \ell_7$. Since $\ell_x$ is just $\ell_{x-1}$ reflected over the perpendicular bisecter of some side, and because the internal tangent is not dependent on the circle (it is in fact what makes the next circle), we just have to prove that $\ell_1 = \ell_7$.

Call $\angle A_2A_1A_3$ $a$, $\angle A_3A_2A_1$ $b$, and $\angle A_1A_3A_2$ $c$
We know that the angle formed by $A_1$, $A_2$, and $\ell_1$ is less than $a$ (otherwise $\omega_2$ does not exist). Thus we call this $x$ and we know that the angle formed by $\ell_1$, $A_1$, and $A_3$ is $a-x$ we can see that this is equal to the angle formed by $A_1$, $A_3$, and $\ell_2$, so we know that the angle formed by $\ell_2$, $A_3$, $A_2$ is $b-a+x$. Continuing this pattern for subsequent angles we find that the next angles are $180-2b-x$, $a+2b+x - 180$, $180 - a - b - x$, and $x$. Thus we find that $\ell_7 = \ell_1$ and we are done. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
eibc
600 posts
#22
Y by
For $1 \le i \le 7$, let $O_i$ be the center of $\omega_i$ and $\theta_i = \measuredangle O_iA_iA_{i + 1} = \measuredangle A_iA_{i + 1}O_i$. Then for $2 \le i \le 7$, the tangency condition tells us that $O_{i - 1}, A_i$, and $O_i$ are collinear, so
$$\theta_i = \measuredangle O_iA_iA_{i + 1} = \measuredangle O_{i - 1} A_iA_{i + 1} = \measuredangle O_{i - 1}A_iA_{i - 1} + \measuredangle A_{i - 1}A_iA_{i + 1} = -\theta_{i - 1} + \measuredangle A_{i - 1}A_iA_{i + 1}.$$Therefore, applying this identity in succession, we have
$$\theta_7 = \theta_1 + \sum_{i = 2}^7 (-1)^{7 - i} \measuredangle A_{i - 1}A_iA_{i + 1} = \theta_1 + \sum_{i = 2}^4 ((-1)^{7 - i} + (-1)^{4 - i})(\measuredangle A_{i -1}A_iA_{i + 1}) = \theta_1.$$Thus, $\measuredangle O_1A_1A_2 = \measuredangle O_7A_1A_2$ and $\measuredangle A_1A_2O_1 = \measuredangle A_1A_2O_7$. This is enough to imply that $O_1 = O_7$ since we would otherwise have $\angle O_1A_1A_2 + \angle O_7A_1A_2 = 180^{\circ}$ (using non-directed angles), which is impossible since $\angle O_1A_1A_2, \angle O_7A_1A_2 < 90^{\circ}$. So, we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cursed_tangent1434
623 posts
#23
Y by
Cute problem. Let $O_i$ denote the center of each circle $\omega_i$. Let $\ell_1 , \ell_2$ and $\ell_3$ denote respectively the perpendicular bisectors of segments $BC , AB$ and $AC$. Note that for all $k = 2,3, \dots, 7$, the center $O_k$ of $\omega_k$ lies on the line $\ell_{k-1 \pmod{3}}$. First, note that since $O_k$ is a center of a circle passing through points $A_{k+1}$ and $A_{k}$, it must lie on $\ell_{k \pmod{3}}$. Further, since it is externally tangent to $\omega_{k-1}$, which clearly passes through $A_k$ as well, $O_k$ also lies on $\overline{O_kA_{k \pmod{3}}}$.

Now, with this information in hand, it suffices to show that point $O_1 , A_1$ and $O_6$ are collinear since then $O_7 = O_1$ and thus $\omega_7 = \omega_1$ as desired. To see why, simply note that
\[\measuredangle O_1A_1O_4 = \measuredangle O_4A_2O_1 = \measuredangle O_5A_2O_2 = \measuredangle O_2A_3O_5 = \measuredangle O_3A_3O_6 = \measuredangle O_6A_1O_3\]which implies that $O_1 , A_1$ and $O_6$ are collinear finishing the proof.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Maximilian113
575 posts
#24
Y by
Let $a, b, c$ be the angles of the triangle, and $x = \angle A_1O_1A_2.$ Then observe we obtain the sequence $$x, 180-b-x, b+x-c, 180-b-x+c-a.$$Doing this one more time yields $x,$ the original angle so we are done. QED
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a