Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.

Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.

Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

AIME Problem Series A
Thursday, May 22 - Jul 31

AIME Problem Series B
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
May 1, 2025
0 replies
sum (a^2 + b^2)/2ab + 2(ab + bc + ca)/3 >=5
parmenides51   8
N 6 minutes ago by skellyrah
Source: 2023 Greece JBMO TST p3/ easy version of Shortlist 2022 A6 https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h3099025p28018726
Let $a, b,$ and $c$ be positive real numbers such that $a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = 3$. Prove that
$$\frac{a^2 + b^2}{2ab} + \frac{b^2 + c^2}{2bc} + \frac{c^2 + a^2}{2ca} + \frac{2(ab + bc + ca)}{3} \ge 5 $$When equality holds?
8 replies
parmenides51
May 17, 2024
skellyrah
6 minutes ago
official solution of IGO
ABCD1728   0
31 minutes ago
Source: IGO official website
Where can I get the official solution of IGO for 2023 and 2024, there are some inhttps://imogeometry.blogspot.com/p/iranian-geometry-olympiad.html, but where can I find them on the official website, thanks :)
0 replies
ABCD1728
31 minutes ago
0 replies
Geometry in a square
socrates   8
N an hour ago by AylyGayypow009
Points $M$ and $N$ lie on the sides $BC$ and $CD$ of the square $ABCD,$ respectively, and $\angle MAN = 45^{\circ}$. The circle through $A,B,C,D$ intersects $AM$ and $AN$ again at $P$ and $Q$, respectively. Prove that $MN || PQ.$
8 replies
socrates
May 18, 2015
AylyGayypow009
an hour ago
AP Exam Leaks
acorn1234512   0
2 hours ago
Tired of studying for your AP Exams?

Look no further. Regardless of your timezone, Paul's Leaks will have ALL of the AP Exams with ALL of the versions with enough time for you to memorize (with solutions).

This happens through a DISCLOSED method. More info in the Telegram. Link below.

Have fun with your 5s, and for those who are studying, good luck.

Join the Telegram: t(dot)me/paulsleaks with or PM me on Telegram: @apleakspaul
0 replies
acorn1234512
2 hours ago
0 replies
No more topics!
Nice problem
Tiks   24
N Apr 10, 2025 by Nari_Tom
Source: IMO Shortlist 2000, G6
Let $ ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. The perpendicular bisectors of its sides $ AB$ and $ CD$ meet at $ Y$. Denote by $ X$ a point inside the quadrilateral $ ABCD$ such that $ \measuredangle ADX = \measuredangle BCX < 90^{\circ}$ and $ \measuredangle DAX = \measuredangle CBX < 90^{\circ}$. Show that $ \measuredangle AYB = 2\cdot\measuredangle ADX$.
24 replies
Tiks
Nov 2, 2005
Nari_Tom
Apr 10, 2025
Source: IMO Shortlist 2000, G6
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Tiks
1144 posts
#1 • 4 Y
Y by Adventure10, Rounak_iitr, Kingsbane2139, and 1 other user
Let $ ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. The perpendicular bisectors of its sides $ AB$ and $ CD$ meet at $ Y$. Denote by $ X$ a point inside the quadrilateral $ ABCD$ such that $ \measuredangle ADX = \measuredangle BCX < 90^{\circ}$ and $ \measuredangle DAX = \measuredangle CBX < 90^{\circ}$. Show that $ \measuredangle AYB = 2\cdot\measuredangle ADX$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pohoatza
1145 posts
#2 • 6 Y
Y by NewAlbionAcademy, Phie11, Adventure10, DCMaths, Om245, and 1 other user
We have that $\triangle{ADX}$ is similar with $\triangle{BCX}$, thus there exists 2 points $M,N$ on the perpendicular bisector of $(AB)$ such that $\triangle{AMN}$ is similar with $\triangle{ADX}$, and $\triangle{BMN}$ is similar with $\triangle{BCX}$.
So we have that $\frac{AD}{AM}=\frac{AX}{AN}$ and $\angle{DAM}=\angle{XAN}$, but $\triangle{ADM}$ beeing similar with $\triangle{AXN}$, we have $\frac{AD}{AX}=\frac{DM}{XN}$, and similar $\frac{BC}{BX}=\frac{CM}{XN}$, thus we have $CM=DM$, therefore $M$ lies on both perpendicular bisectors of $AB$ and $CD$, therefore $M \equiv Y$.
Now it follows easy, because $\angle{AYB}=2\angle{AYN}=2\angle{ADX}$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The QuattoMaster 6000
1184 posts
#3 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Tiks wrote:
Let $ ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. The perpendicular bisectors of its sides $ AB$ and $ CD$ meet at $ Y$. Denote by $ X$ a point inside the quadrilateral $ ABCD$ such that $ \measuredangle ADX = \measuredangle BCX < 90^{\circ}$ and $ \measuredangle DAX = \measuredangle CBX < 90^{\circ}$. Show that $ \measuredangle AYB = 2\cdot\measuredangle ADX$.
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
SnowEverywhere
801 posts
#4 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Does this solution work? I am really unsure as to whether it works because it seems like too simple a solution especially for an ISL #6. Does anyone think that this problem is a little similar to IMO 1975 #3?

Solution

Define point $Y'$ to be on the perpendicular bisector of $AB$ and such that $\angle{AY'B}=2\angle{ADX}$. Define point $Z$ to be such that $\angle{AZY'}=\angle{BZY'}=\angle{AXD}=\angle{BXC}$. Note that since $Z$ and $Y'$ are on the perpendicular bisector of $AB$, $AY'=BY'$ and $AZ=BZ$.

By AA similarity, we have that $\triangle{AXD} \sim \triangle{AZY'}$ and $\triangle{BXC} \sim \triangle{BZY'}$. This yields by spiral similarity that $\triangle{AZX} \sim \triangle{AY'D}$ and $\triangle{BZX} \sim \triangle{BY'C}$. Therefore,

\[\frac{ZX}{DY'}=\frac{AZ}{AY'}=\frac{BZ}{BY'}=\frac{ZX}{CY'}\]
This yields that $DY'=CY'$ and therefore that $Y'=Y$ is the intersection of the perpendicular bisectors of $AB$ and $CD$. Therefore $\angle{AY'B}=\angle{AYB}=2\angle{ADX}$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mathuz
1520 posts
#5 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Let $M,N$ are midpoints of the sides $AB$ and $CD$ and $DX\cap AB=P(1)$, $AX\cap CD=Q(.)$. Then since $ \triangle AXD \sim \triangle BXC$ we get that $ \angle BXP=\angle CXQ $, $ \angle AXP=\angle DXQ $ and \[ \frac{AX}{BX}=\frac{DX}{CX}. \] So \[ \frac{AP}{BP}=\frac{DQ}{CQ} \] and the parallel lines pass through $M$ and $N$ to $DX$ and $AX$ respectively, intersect on $AD$. Analoguosly, the parallel lines pass through $M$ and $N$ to $CX$ and $BX$ respectively, intersect on $BC$. Hence $ \angle AYB=2\angle ADX$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mathematicalx
537 posts
#6 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Dear mathuz, i dont understand how the result follows. (rest is ok)
Could you explain a bit ?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Wolowizard
617 posts
#7 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
My solution:
Let circumcerntres of $\triangle DAX$ and $\triangle BCX$ be $O_1,O_2$. Let $Y$ be point such that $AY=BY$ and $\angle AYB=2\angle ADX$.
Since $\angle AO_1X=2\angle ADX$ we have $\triangle O_1AX$ ~$\triangle AYB$ so $\frac{AO_1}{AY}=\frac{AX}{AB}$ and since $\angle O_1AY=\angle XAB$ we have that $\triangle AO_1Y$~$\triangle AXB$. Similary we have $\triangle BO_2Y$~$\triangle AXB$.
Now we have $O_1Y=\frac{AY}{AB}BX$ and $O_2Y=\frac{BY}{AB}AX$ and $O_1X=\frac{AX}{AB}AY$ and $O_2X=\frac{BX}{AB}BY$.

Since $\angle AO_1Y=\angle YO_2B$ and $\angle DAX=\angle CBX$ we have $\angle DO_1Y=\angle CO_2Y$. Now by Law of Cosine we have
$DY^2=O_1D^2+O_1Y^2-2O_1D\cdot O_1Y\cos(DO_1Y)=AY^2(\frac{AX^2+BX^2-2AX\cdot BXcos(DO_1Y)}{AB^2})$
and
$CY^2=O_2Y^2+O_2C^2-2O_2Y\cdot O_2Ccos(CO_2Y)=AY^2(\frac{AX^2+BX^2-2AX\cdot BXcos(DO_1Y)}{AB^2})$ which implies
$DY=CY$ so $Y$ is the intersection of perpendicular bisectors of $AB,CD$.
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by Wolowizard, Feb 14, 2016, 3:51 PM
Reason: Replaced X with Y
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
anantmudgal09
1980 posts
#8 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Feels too convenient, so perhaps I missed something? :maybe:
Tiks wrote:
Let $ ABCD$ be a convex quadrilateral. The perpendicular bisectors of its sides $ AB$ and $ CD$ meet at $ Y$. Denote by $ X$ a point inside the quadrilateral $ ABCD$ such that $ \measuredangle ADX = \measuredangle BCX < 90^{\circ}$ and $ \measuredangle DAX = \measuredangle CBX < 90^{\circ}$. Show that $ \measuredangle AYB = 2\cdot\measuredangle ADX$.

WLOG let rays $\overrightarrow{BA}, \overrightarrow{CD}$ intersect. Let $M, N$ be midpoints of $\overline{AB}, \overline{CD}$ respectively. Let $P$ be the spiral center $\overline{AB} \mapsto \overline{DC}$. Construct $E, F$ outside $ABCD$ with $\triangle AEB \sim \triangle DYC$ and $\triangle AYB \sim \triangle DFC$. Observe that $\triangle AEY \sim \triangle DYF$ with spiral center $P$ again. Further, we see $k=\tfrac{EM}{MY}=\tfrac{YN}{NF}$. Let $L$ be the point on $\overline{DA}$ with $\tfrac{AL}{LD}=k$. Suppose $X$ is the point inside $ABCD$ with $\triangle LMN \sim \triangle XBC$.

Lemma. $\overline{XL} \perp \overline{DA}$ and $\triangle XAD \sim \triangle XBC$.

(Proof) By linearity, $\triangle AEY \mapsto \triangle LMN \mapsto \triangle DYF$ under spiral similarity with pivot $P$. Apply $\triangle PDA \sim \triangle PNM \sim \triangle PYE$ hence $\angle PME=\angle PLA$. Combined with $\angle PMB=\angle PLX$ we obtain $\angle XLA=\angle BME=90^{\circ}$. Now reflect $X$ in $L$ to get $X'$. Again linearity gives $\triangle X'AD \sim \triangle XBC$ and we're done. $\blacksquare$

Finally, we see $\triangle XAD \sim \triangle LMN \sim \triangle DFY$ hence $\tfrac{1}{2}\angle AYB=\angle AYE=\angle ADX$ and we're done here.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
tastymath75025
3223 posts
#9 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Assume $AB,CD$ aren't parallel; otherwise the problem doesn't make sense.

Let $X_1,X_2$ be the reflections of $X$ over $BC,AD$ and $X_3,X_4$ be the projections of $X$ onto $BC,AD$. Let $M,N$ be the midpoints of $AB,CD$. Clearly $X_2AXD, XBX_1C$ are directly similar kites, so they're also similar to their direct average $X_4MX_3N$. Since $AX_4:X_4D=BX_3:X_3C$ and $AB,CD$ aren't parallel, this implies $X_4,X_3$ are the only such points on $AD,BC$ which divide segments $AD,BC$ in the same ratio with $X_3X_4\perp MN$.

Next construct $Y_1,Y_2$ with $DYC\sim AY_1B, DY_2C\sim AYB$. Once again $AY_1BY, DYCY_2$ are directly similar kites, so for any $r$ their weighted average $r(AY_1BY)+(1-r)(DYCY_2)$ is also a kite. Since $Y_1M:MY=YN:NY_2$ we can choose $r$ so that this resulting kite contains $M,N$; then the other two vertices of the kite must lie on $AD,BC$, divide those two segments in the same ratio, and create a segment perpendicular to $MN$. This implies these other two vertices are precisely $X_4,X_3$ by our earlier work, hence $MX_4NX_3\sim Y_1AYB$ and $\angle AYB =\angle X_2DX=2\angle ADX$; the other equality follows similarly.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
lminsl
544 posts
#10 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Let us deal with non-trivial cases with $AB \not \parallel CD$.

Let $\odot (ADX)$ and $\odot (BCX)$ meet at $Z$, and $\odot (ABZ)$ meets $\odot (CDZ)$ at $W$. We claim that $W$ coincides with $Y$.

Simple angle chasing gives $\angle AYB=\angle AWB$, and $\angle CYD=\angle CWD$. Also line $ZX$ is the internal angle bisector of $\angle AZB, \angle CZD$, so it suffices to prove that $ZW \perp XZ$.

Now invert the diagram with centre $Z$. Denote by $T '$ by the image of any point $T$.
Note that $X'=A'D' \cap B'C'$, and $W'=A'B' \cap C'D'$, and $ZX'$ bisects both $\angle A'ZB'$ and $\angle C'ZD'$. Assume that line $ZX'$ meets $A'B', C'D'$ at $U, V$, and a line perpendicular to $ZX'$ passing $Z$ meets $A'B', C'D'$ at $P, Q$, respectively. Then,
$$ X'(A'B', UP)=Z(A'B',UP) = -1=Z(C'D', VQ)=X(C'D', VQ),$$so $P$ and $Q$ coincides with $W'$. Thus $X'Z \perp WZ'$, which implies $W \equiv Y$. $\square$
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by lminsl, Oct 5, 2019, 1:48 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6877 posts
#11 • 2 Y
Y by v4913, Rounak_iitr
First, a long phantom point argument:
  • Fix $\triangle AXD$ first and let $O$ denote its circumcenter.
  • Let $B$ be as in the original problem.
  • Then we redefine $Y$ such that $\angle AYB = 2 \angle ADX = \angle AOX$ and $AY = BY$.
  • We then redefine $C$ such that $\angle DYC = 2 \angle DAX = \angle DOX$ and $YC = YD$.
  • We will prove $\triangle AXD \sim \triangle BXC$ (oppositely oriented). This will solve the problem.

[asy] pair A = dir(125); pair D = dir(275); pair X = dir(-5); pair O = origin; draw(unitcircle);

pair Y = 1.2*dir(-20); pair B = Y+(A-Y)*X/A;

pair C = Y+(D-Y)*X/D; filldraw(A--O--X--cycle, invisible, deepgreen); filldraw(A--B--Y--cycle, invisible, deepgreen); filldraw(D--O--X--cycle, invisible, blue); filldraw(D--C--Y--cycle, invisible, blue); filldraw(B--X--C--cycle, invisible, grey); draw(circumcircle(B, X, C), grey);

dot("$A$", A, dir(A)); dot("$D$", D, dir(D)); dot("$X$", X, dir(X)); dot("$O$", O, dir(-X)); dot("$Y$", Y, dir(Y)); dot("$B$", B, dir(B)); dot("$C$", C, dir(C));

/* TSQ Source:

A = dir 125 D = dir 275 X = dir -5 O = origin R-X unitcircle

Y = 1.2*dir(-20) B = Y+(A-Y)*X/A

C = Y+(D-Y)*X/D A--O--X--cycle 0.1 lightgreen / deepgreen A--B--Y--cycle 0.1 lightgreen / deepgreen D--O--X--cycle 0.1 lightblue / blue D--C--Y--cycle 0.1 lightblue / blue B--X--C--cycle 0.1 yellow / grey circumcircle B X C grey

*/ [/asy]

Anyways, the main idea is that $\triangle AOX \sim \triangle AYB$ and $\triangle DOX \sim \triangle DYC$. We break symmetry now and set up as follows. Since we have a similarity $\triangle AOY \sim \triangle AXB$, there should be a single complex number $t \in {\mathbb C}$ such that \begin{align*} 	y-a &= t(0-a) \implies y=(1-t)a \\ 	b-a &= t(x-a) \implies b=t(x-a)+a. \end{align*}Next since $\frac{c-y}{d-y} = \frac{x-0}{d-0}$ we have \[ c = y + \frac{(d-y)x}{d} = \frac{d(x+y)-xy}{d}. \]Now, we simply calculate \begin{align*} 	\frac{c-b}{x-b} &= \frac{\frac{d(x+y)-xy}{d}-[t(x-a)+a]}{x-[t(x-a)+a]} \\ 	&= \frac{dx + (d-x)[(1-t)a] - dt(x-a)-da}{d(1-t)(x-a)} \\ 	&= \frac{(1-t)[(d-x)a+dx-da]}{d(1-t)(x-a)} \\ 	&= \frac{(1-t)x(d-a)}{(1-t)d(x-a)} = \frac{x(d-a)}{d(x-a)} \\ 	&= \frac{\frac1d-\frac1a}{\frac1x-\frac1a} 	= \overline{\left( \frac{d-a}{x-a} \right)} \end{align*}as desired.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by v_Enhance, Apr 12, 2020, 10:09 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
arzhang2001
248 posts
#12
Y by
hint : let $O$ be the circumcircle of $\triangle ADX$ then use rotation and similarity properties. :jump:
also use this technique. you should began from verdict and arrive to assumptions.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by arzhang2001, Apr 19, 2020, 2:02 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Stormersyle
2786 posts
#13
Y by
Here's a pretty nice complex solution that nobody's posted yet.

Let $P, Q$, both inside $ABCD$, be points on the perp. bisector of $AB$ such that $\triangle{APQ}\sim \triangle{ADX}$ (note there is only one choice for $P$ and $Q$). For our setup, set $(ABP)$ be the unit circle, let $p=1$, and let $a, q, x$ be the free variables; note $b=\bar{a}=\frac{1}{a}$, and $q$ is real. We desire to prove $PC=PD$, or $|c-1|=|d-1|$.

Now, note $A$ is the spiral center of $PQ, DX$, by the spiral center formula we have $a=\frac{px-qd}{p+x-q-d}=\frac{x-qd}{1+x-q-d}$, which we can rearrange to get $d=\frac{a+ax-aq-x}{a-q}$. Thus, we have $d-1=\frac{(a-1)(x-q)}{a-q}$, so changing $a$ for $\frac{1}{a}$ in this expression, we get $c-1=\frac{(1-a)(x-q)}{1-aq}$. Thus, it suffices to prove that $|a-q|=|1-aq|$, or $(a-q)(\frac{1}{a}-q)=(1-aq)(1-\frac{q}{a})$. But multiplying both sides by $a$, we find the equation indeed holds, so we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
riadok
187 posts
#14 • 2 Y
Y by zuss77, Kar-98k
Noone has posted a short and neat sollutiion using complex weighted gliding lemma, so here it is :-).

Complex Weighted Gliding Lemma: Let $A_1B_1C_1$ and $A_2B_2C_2$ be two similar triangles. Construct points $X$, $Y$, $Z$ such that triangles $A_1XA_2$, $B_1YB_2$ and $C_1ZC_2$ are similar. Then $\triangle XYZ\sim\triangle A_1B_1C_1$.
Proof sketch: As $A_1B_1C_1\sim A_2B_2C_2$ there exist linear function $f$ of complex plane mapping $A_1B_1C_1\mapsto A_2B_2C_2$. Also consider identity function $i$ as a linear function of complex plane. Then to get to points $X$, $Y$, $Z$ you just take weighted average of these functions, but average of linear functions is linear, hence $XYZ\sim A_1B_1C_1$. $\square$

Problem Proof: Denote $X_1$ reflection of $X$ by $AD$ and $X_2$ reflection of $X$ by $BC$. Note that $X_1AX\sim XBX_2$, construct $Y'$ such that $DY'C\sim X_1AX$. Note that $X_1DX\sim XCX_2$, hence if we can complex glide them to $AY'B$, hence $AY'B\sim X_1DX$. Because triangles $AY'B$ and $DY'C$ are isosceles, we get $Y'=Y$ and from similarities we got the angle condition, that problem wanted. $\square$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pad
1671 posts
#16 • 3 Y
Y by nukelauncher, Gaussian_cyber, Rounak_iitr
Solved with nukelauncher.

Diagram (No geogebra, just Microsoft Paint!)

Let $O$ be the cirumcenter of $\triangle ADX$. Redefine $Y$ such that $\triangle AOX\sim \triangle AYB$, hence $\angle AYB=\angle AOX=2\angle ADX$. We want to show $Y$ lies on the perpendicular bisector of $\overline{CD}$. Let $(ADX)$ be the unit circle, so $O=0$. We fix $A,X,D$ and $B$ as arbitrary points, and will calculate $Y$ and $C$ based on these points.

WLOG by rotation set $x=1$, so $OX$ is the real axis. From the spiral similarity sending $\triangle AOX$ to $\triangle AYB$, we have
\[ \frac{y-a}{0-a} = \frac{b-a}{x-a} \implies y=\frac{-a(b-a)}{x-a}+a=a\cdot \frac{1-b}{1-a}\]Let $\bullet'$ denote the reflection over real axis of $\bullet$. The angle conditions imply that there exists a spiral similarity sending $A'\mapsto B$ and $D'\mapsto C$. Hence
\begin{align*}
\frac{c-x}{\bar{d}-x} = \frac{b-x}{\bar{a}-x} \implies c&=\frac{(\bar d-x)(b-x)}{\bar a-x} +x \\
&=\frac{\left(\frac1d-1\right)(b-1)}{\frac1a-1} + 1 \\
&= \frac{b/d-1/d-b+1/a}{1/a-1} \\
&= \frac{ab-a-abd+d}{d(1-a)}.
\end{align*}Since we wanted to show $Y$ is on the perpendicular bisector of $CD$, it suffices to prove that $y$ satisfies
\begin{align*}
|y-d|=|y-c|\iff (y-d)(\bar y-\bar d)=(y-c)(\bar y-\bar c). 
\end{align*}So if $Z=\tfrac{y-d}{y-c}$, we need to prove $Z\cdot \bar Z=1$. Magically, \begin{align*}     Z=\frac{y-d}{y-c}&=\frac{a\cdot\frac{1-b}{1-a}-d}{a\cdot\frac{1-b}{1-a}-\frac{ab-a-abd+d}{d(1-a)}}\\     &=\frac{a(1-b)-d(1-a)}{a(1-b)-\frac{ab-a-abd+d}d}\\     &=\frac{a-ab-d+ad}{a+\frac{a-ab}d-1}\\     &=\frac{ad-abd-d^2+ad^2}{ad+a-ab-d}\\     &=d. \end{align*}Hence $Z\cdot\bar Z=d\cdot \bar d=1$. The end.

Motivational Remarks
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by pad, Nov 4, 2020, 8:35 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mathaddiction
308 posts
#17 • 1 Y
Y by Lcz
[asy]
size(10cm); real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(0); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ real xmin = -2.284525133697541, xmax = 1.4988894102199524, ymin = -2.1370192645104247, ymax = 0.7145926356744539;  /* image dimensions */pen qqwuqq = rgb(0,0.39215686274509803,0); pen zzttqq = rgb(0.6,0.2,0); draw(arc((-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838),0.0887431089269154,-67.05336014619634,-28.653452989196374)--(-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838)--cycle, linewidth(2) + qqwuqq); draw(arc((0.18023545231029714,-0.43181690860373295),0.0887431089269154,112.94663985380367,159.86126655150957)--(0.18023545231029714,-0.43181690860373295)--cycle, linewidth(2) + qqwuqq); draw((0.18277289490842602,0.4248335965116655)--(-0.6889109221157496,-0.7860196712682731)--(0.7567611090605788,-0.4171962836832381)--cycle, linewidth(2) + blue); draw((0.18277289490842602,0.4248335965116655)--(-0.9972925084238106,0)--(0.18023545231029714,-0.43181690860373295)--cycle, linewidth(2) + blue); draw((-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838)--(-0.9972925084238106,0)--(-1.4525810536799912,-1.1462058127995842)--cycle, linewidth(2) + zzttqq); draw((-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838)--(0.18023545231029714,-0.43181690860373295)--(0.7567611090605788,-0.4171962836832381)--cycle, linewidth(2) + zzttqq);  /* draw figures */draw((-0.9972925084238106,0)--(-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838), linewidth(0.8)); draw((-0.9972925084238106,0)--(0.18023545231029714,-0.43181690860373295), linewidth(0.8)); draw((0.18023545231029714,-0.43181690860373295)--(-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838), linewidth(0.8)); draw((-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838)--(0.7567611090605788,-0.4171962836832381), linewidth(0.8)); draw((-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838)--(-0.7836941442682793,-0.6192726960861138), linewidth(0.8)); draw((-0.9972925084238106,0)--(-1.4525810536799912,-1.1462058127995842), linewidth(0.8)); draw((-0.9972925084238106,0)--(0.18277289490842602,0.4248335965116655), linewidth(0.8)); draw((0.18277289490842602,0.4248335965116655)--(0.7567611090605788,-0.4171962836832381), linewidth(0.8)); draw((-1.4525810536799912,-1.1462058127995842)--(-0.7836941442682793,-0.6192726960861138), linewidth(0.8)); draw((-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838)--(0.18277289490842602,0.4248335965116655), linewidth(0.8)); draw((-1.4525810536799912,-1.1462058127995842)--(0.7567611090605788,-0.4171962836832381), linewidth(0.8)); draw((0.18277289490842602,0.4248335965116655)--(-0.6889109221157496,-0.7860196712682731), linewidth(2) + blue); draw((-0.6889109221157496,-0.7860196712682731)--(0.7567611090605788,-0.4171962836832381), linewidth(2) + blue); draw((0.7567611090605788,-0.4171962836832381)--(0.18277289490842602,0.4248335965116655), linewidth(2) + blue); draw((0.18277289490842602,0.4248335965116655)--(-0.9972925084238106,0), linewidth(2) + blue); draw((-0.9972925084238106,0)--(0.18023545231029714,-0.43181690860373295), linewidth(2) + blue); draw((0.18023545231029714,-0.43181690860373295)--(0.18277289490842602,0.4248335965116655), linewidth(2) + blue); draw((-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838)--(-0.9972925084238106,0), linewidth(2) + zzttqq); draw((-0.9972925084238106,0)--(-1.4525810536799912,-1.1462058127995842), linewidth(2) + zzttqq); draw((-1.4525810536799912,-1.1462058127995842)--(-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838), linewidth(2) + zzttqq); draw((-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838)--(0.18023545231029714,-0.43181690860373295), linewidth(2) + zzttqq); draw((0.18023545231029714,-0.43181690860373295)--(0.7567611090605788,-0.4171962836832381), linewidth(2) + zzttqq); draw((0.7567611090605788,-0.4171962836832381)--(-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838), linewidth(2) + zzttqq);  /* dots and labels */dot((-0.0013365322724531775,-0.0029500725262597838),dotstyle); label("$X$", (0.010963283878670751,0.025354489675411564), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((-0.9972925084238106,0),dotstyle); label("$D$", (-0.985917639733679,0.02831259330630874), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((0.18277289490842602,0.4248335965116655),dotstyle); label("$A$", (0.19436570899429592,0.4542795161555022), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((0.7567611090605788,-0.4171962836832381),dotstyle); label("$B$", (0.7682378133883488,-0.38878001865019324), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((0.18023545231029714,-0.43181690860373295),dotstyle); label("$A'$", (0.19140760536339874,-0.40357053680467914), NE * labelscalefactor);  dot((-1.4525810536799912,-1.1462058127995842),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); label("$Y$", (-0.7889109221157496,-0.7860196712682731), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((-0.6889109221157496,-0.7860196712682731),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); label("$C$", (-1.6782748621203722,-1.2), NE * labelscalefactor); clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
[/asy]
Let $A'$ be the reflection of $A$ in $DX$. Redefine $Y$ as the point such that $A$ is the center of spiral similarity which sends $DA'$ to $BY$, then $\angle AYB=\angle ADA'=2\angle ADX$ and $AY=YB$. Therefore, it suffices to show $YD=YC$.

Setting up the complex plane with $d=-1$ and $x=0$, then $a'=\overline{a}$.
Notice that from the spiral similarity formula we have
$$a=\frac{db-a'y}{d+b-a'-y}$$Changing the subject we have
$$y=\frac{ab+b-a-a\overline{a}}{a-\overline{a}}$$Now notice that $X$ is the center of spiral similarlity sending $DC$ to $A'B$. Therefore,
$$0=db-a'c$$Hence $$c=\frac{-b}{\overline{a}}$$Now $$y-d=\frac{ab+b-a-a\overline{a}+a-\overline{a}}{a-\overline{a}}=\frac{(b-\overline{a})(a+1)}{a-\overline{a}}$$Meanwhile
$$y-c=\frac{ab+b-a-a\overline{a}}{a-\overline{a}}+\frac{b}{\overline{a}}=\frac{a(\overline{a}+1)(b-\overline{a})}{\overline{a}(a-\overline{a})}$$It is easy to see that they have the same modulus, so we are done.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by mathaddiction, Nov 19, 2020, 1:41 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
DottedCaculator
7345 posts
#18
Y by
complex solution without phantom points

[asy]
unitsize(2cm);
pair A, B, C, D, X, Y;
X=(0,0);
A=(-1,2);
B=(-2,-2);
C=(3,-1);
D=A*(2*foot(C/B,(0,0),(1,0))-C/B);
Y=extension((A+B)/2,circumcenter(A,B,C),(C+D)/2,circumcenter(B,C,D));
draw(A--B--C--D--A--X--D--C--X--B);
draw(A--Y--B--C--Y--D);
label("$A$", A, NW);
label("$B$", B, SW);
label("$C$", C, SE);
label("$D$", D, NE);
label("$X$", X, W);
label("$Y$", Y, S);
[/asy]

Since $\angle ADX=\angle BCX$ and $\angle DAX=\angle CBX$, this means that $\triangle ADX\sim\triangle BCX$, so $\frac{d-x}{a-x}=\frac{\overline c-\overline x}{\overline b-\overline x}$. since $X$ is inside $ABCD$. Assume without loss of generality $x=0$. Then, we have $\overline bd=a\overline c$.
Now, since $|y-a|=|y-b|$, we must have
\begin{align*}
(y-a)(\overline y-\overline a)&=(y-b)(\overline y-\overline b)\\
-a\overline y-y\overline a+|a|^2&=-b\overline y-y\overline b+|b|^2\\
y(\overline b-\overline a)+\overline y(b-a)&=|b|^2-|a|^2.
\end{align*}Similarly, we have
$$y(\overline d-\overline c)+\overline y(d-c)=|d|^2-|c|^2.$$Therefore, we have
$$y=\frac{(|b|^2-|a|^2)(d-c)-(b-a)(|d|^2-|c|^2)}{(\overline b-\overline a)(d-c)-(b-a)(\overline d-\overline c)}.$$We need to show that $\frac{(a-y)(d-x)^2}{(y-b)(a-d)^2}$ is real. We have $$y-b=\frac{\overline a(b-a)(d-c)-(b-a)(|d|^2-|c|^2)+(b-a)(b\overline d-b\overline c)}{(\overline b-\overline a)(d-c)-(b-a)(\overline d-\overline c)}=\frac{(b-a)(\overline ad-\overline ac-d\overline d+c\overline c+b\overline d-b\overline c)}{(\overline b-\overline a)(d-c)-(b-a)(\overline d-\overline c)}.$$Similarly, we have
$$y-a=\frac{(b-a)(\overline bd-\overline bc-d\overline d+c\overline c+a\overline d-a\overline c)}{(\overline b-\overline a)(d-c)-(b-a)(\overline d-\overline c)}.$$Therefore, we have $\frac{a-y}{y-b}=-\frac{\overline bd-\overline bc-d\overline d+c\overline c+a\overline d-a\overline c}{\overline ad-\overline ac-d\overline d+c\overline c+b\overline d-b\overline c}$. Since $\overline bd=a\overline c$, we also have $b\overline d=\overline ac$. Therefore, this means that
$$\frac{a-y}{y-b}=-\frac{-\overline bc-d\overline d+c\overline c+a\overline d}{\overline ad-d\overline d+c\overline c-b\overline c},$$so $$\frac{(a-y)(d-x)^2}{(y-b)(a-d)^2}=\frac{(\overline bc+d\overline d-c\overline c-a\overline d)d^2}{(\overline ad-d\overline d+c\overline c-b\overline c)(a-d)^2}.$$Therefore, it suffices to show that $$\frac{(\overline bc+d\overline d-c\overline c-a\overline d)d^2}{(\overline ad-d\overline d+c\overline c-b\overline c)(a-d)^2}=\frac{(b\overline c+d\overline d-c\overline c-\overline ad)\overline d^2}{(a\overline d-d\overline d+c\overline c-\overline bc)(\overline a-\overline d)^2}.$$This is equivalent to
$$\frac{(\overline bc+d\overline d-c\overline c-a\overline d)^2}{(\overline ad-d\overline d+c\overline c-b\overline c)^2}=\frac{(a-d)^2\overline d^2}{d^2(\overline a-\overline d)^2}.$$We will show that $\frac{\overline bc+d\overline d-c\overline c-a\overline d}{\overline ad-d\overline d+c\overline c-b\overline c}=\frac{(a-d)\overline d}{d(\overline d-\overline a)}$. Adding one to each side gives $$\frac{\overline ad-a\overline d+\overline bc-b\overline c}{\overline ad-d\overline d+c\overline c-b\overline c}=\frac{a\overline d-\overline ad}{d(\overline d-\overline a)},$$which is equivalent to $$\frac{a\overline d-\overline ad+b\overline c-\overline bc}{d(\overline d-\overline a)+\overline c(b-c)}=\frac{a\overline d-\overline ad}{d(\overline d-\overline a)}.$$Therefore, it suffices to show $\frac{a\overline d-\overline ad}{d(\overline d-\overline a)}=\frac{b\overline c-\overline bc}{\overline c(b-c)}$. Since $d=\frac{a\overline c}{\overline b}$, this means that we have
\begin{align*}
\frac{a\overline d-\overline ad}{d(\overline d-\overline a)}&=\frac{a\frac{\overline ac}b-\overline a\frac{a\overline c}{\overline b}}{\frac{a\overline c}{\overline b}(\frac{\overline ac}b-\overline a)}\\
&=\frac{\frac cb-\frac{\overline c}{\overline b}}{\frac{\overline c}{\overline b}(\frac{c-b}b)}\\
&=\frac{\overline bc-b\overline c}{\overline c(c-b)}\\
&=\frac{b\overline c-\overline bc}{\overline c(b-c)}.
\end{align*}
Therefore, this means that $\angle AYB=2\angle ADX$.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by DottedCaculator, Feb 20, 2022, 12:52 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
JAnatolGT_00
559 posts
#19
Y by
Let $Y',Z$ be points on perpendicular bisector of $AB,$ such that $AY'Z\stackrel{+}{\sim} ADX,BY'Z\stackrel{+}{\sim} BCX.$
By spiral similarity $AXZ\stackrel{+}{\sim} ADY',BXZ\stackrel{+}{\sim} BCY',$ so $$\frac{|AY'|}{|Y'D|}=\frac{|AZ|}{|ZX|}=\frac{|BZ|}{|ZX|}=\frac{|BY'|}{|Y'C|}\implies |Y'C|=|Y'D|\implies Y'=Y.$$Finally $\measuredangle AYX=2\measuredangle AYZ=2\measuredangle ADX,$ as desired.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by JAnatolGT_00, May 24, 2022, 6:06 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
awesomeming327.
1711 posts
#20
Y by
Note that $\triangle AXD\sim \triangle BXC$. There exists a unique spiral similarity that takes $DX$ onto line $EY$. Let $D\to P$ and $E\to Q$. We have that $\triangle BQP\cong \triangle AQP$ so $\triangle BQP \sim \triangle BXC$. We also have $\triangle BQX\sim \triangle BPC$ and $\triangle AQX\sim\triangle APD$. Thus,
\[\frac{DP}{CP}=\frac{AP}{BP}\cdot \frac{QX}{AQ}\cdot \frac{BQ}{QX}=1\]so $CP=DP$, implying $P=Y$ and the result follows.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
popop614
271 posts
#21
Y by
Weird solution:
Let $O$ be the circumcenter of $\triangle AXD$, and denote by $K, Z$ the images of $D, O$ under the spiral similarity taking $AD$ to $AB$.
Now $DK/AD=BX/AX=BC/AD$ so $DK=BC$. Now in directed angles,
\[ \angle ZKD = \angle ZKA + \angle AKD = \angle ZKA + \angle ABX = \angle ZKA + \angle ABZ + \angle ZBX = \angle KAB + \angle ZBX = \angle XBC + \angle ZBX = \angle ZBC \], so \triangle ZBC \cong \triangle ZKD$, whence $Z = Y$. This finishes.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
OronSH
1730 posts
#22 • 2 Y
Y by Om245, GeoKing
Redefine $Y$ to the clawson schmidt conjugate of $X$ and let $P=(AXD)\cap(BXC)\cap(AYB)\cap(CYD).$ Angle chasing gives $PX$ bisects both $\angle APB$ and $\angle CPD.$ Now invert at $P.$ After inversion if we define $Y',Y''$ to be the intersections of the line through $P$ perpendicular to $PX$ with $AB,CD$ then prism lemma and the angle bisector harmonic bundles give $Y'=Y''=Y.$ Thus $\angle XPY=90^\circ$ so $PY$ is a bisector of $\angle APB$ and $\angle CPD$ as well. Thus $AY=BY,CY=DY$ so $Y$ is the same point as given in the problem. Now $\measuredangle AYB=\measuredangle APB=2\measuredangle APX=2\measuredangle ADX.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TestX01
341 posts
#23 • 3 Y
Y by GeoKing, bjump, OronSH
@above

Nice, I got the exact same solution.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TestX01
341 posts
#25 • 2 Y
Y by OronSH, L13832
let me cook

translating unicode from word into latex on aops is annoying.

What if we take Clawson Schmidt Conjugate of $Y$!!!

Let $X'$ be the Clawson-Schmidt Conjugate of $Y$. We will prove that $X'=X. $
Let $P=(AYB\cap CPD)$. All angles are directed in this solution.
Lemma: $\angle APB$ and $\angle CPD$ share an angle bisector.
Let $E$ be the antipode of $Y$ in $(AYB)$ and let $F$ be the antipode of $Y$ in $(CPD)$. By the definition of perpendicular bisectors, $E,F$ are respective midpoints of arcs $AB, CD$ of their respective circles, not containing $Y. $
This means, by the Incentre Excentre Lemma, that $PE$ bisects $\angle APB$ and $PF$ bisects $\angle CPD.$

Yet by Thales, as $EY$ and $FY$ are diameters by symmetry, $\angle EPY=90^\circ$, and $\angle YPF=90^\circ$. Thus, $E,P,F$ are collinear, hence $\angle APB$ and $\angle CPD$ share an angle bisector.
Corollary: This angle bisector is the line through $E,P,F.$
Now consider an inversion at $P$ with radius $PY$. Let $K^*$ be the inverse of $K$. Note $Y^*=Y.$
By Clawson-Schmidt conjugation’s definition, $APYB,PYCD,APX' D,BPX' C$ are cyclic. Hence,
\[A^*,Y,B^* \quad C^*,Y,D^* \quad A^*,X'^* ,D^* \quad B^*,X'^* ,C^*\]are collinear (within each triple).
We thus have the complete quadrilateral $A^* B^* YC^* D^* X'^{*}$.
Clearly, $E^*$ is the intersection of the angle bisector of $\angle APB$ with $A^* B^*$, and similarly $F^*$ is the intersection with $C^* D^*$. Recall that by Thales, $\angle EPY=90^\circ=\angle YPF$, and since $E^* PF^*$ is the angle bisector, it is well-known that the two conditions imply :
\[(A^*,B^*,E^*,Y)=-1=(C^*,D^*,Y,F^* )\]By the Prism Lemma,$ E^*,F^*,X'^{*}$ are collinear looking at our complete quadrilateral. This means that $E,F,X'$ are collinear.
We proceed by straightforward angle relations in cyclic quadrilaterals.
\begin{align}
\angle ADX'=\angle APE=\angle EPB=\angle X' CB\\
\angle X' AD=\angle X' PD=\angle CPX'=\angle CBX'
\end{align}Hence $X'$ works.
Claim: Only one $X$ exists satisfying the properties in the problem, which is $X'$.
Let us consider the locus of points $X_1$ such $\angle DAX_1=\angle X_1 BC$, without the acute angle restraint. Construct the point $X_1'$ such that $X_1 BX_1' C$ is a parallelogram. Let $P=AD\cap BC.  $
As $P,A,D$ and $P,B,C$ are collinear,
\[\angle PAX_1'=180^\circ-\angle X_1 AD-\angle X_1' AX_1=180^\circ-\angle X_1 BX_1'-\angle CBX_1=\angle X_1' BP\]Let $\Phi$ be the function that takes the isogonal conjugate of an object with respect to $\triangle ABP.$ Then, we have
\[\angle \Phi(X_1' )AB=\angle PAX_1'=\angle X_1' BP=\angle AB\Phi(X_1' )\]This implies that $\Phi(X_1' )$ lies on $\ell_1$, which we define as the perpendicular bisector of $AB$. Since isogonal conjugation is an involution, and obviously all of the before steps hold for the converse, for any $\Phi(X_1')$ on $\ell_1, \Phi(\Phi(X_1' ))=X_1'$ which satisfies the properties in the question.
Hence, letting $\mathcal{L}_1$ be the desired locus, we have
\[\Phi(\mathcal{L}_1 )=\ell_1\]Theorem: The isogonal conjugate of a line with respect to a triangle is a circum-conic.
Let $\ell_1$ intersect $(ABP)$ at $M_1$ and $M_2$ such that $M_1$ is the midpoint of minor arc $AB$, and $M_2$ the midpoint of major arc $AB$.
Claim: $\mathcal{L}_1$ is a rectangular hyperbola.
Consider the isogonal conjugate of $M_1$. We have:
\[\angle APM_1=\angle M_1 PB=\angle M_1 AB=\angle PA\Phi(M_1 )\]By the Incenter Excenter Lemma, thus $PM_1\parallel A\Phi(M_1 )$. Similarly,
\[\angle M_1 PB=\angle APM_1=\angle ABM_1=\angle \Phi(M_1 )BP\]Hence $PM_1\parallel B\Phi(M_1 )$. Note that $P,\Phi(M_1 ),M_1$ are collinear as $PM_1$ is the angle bisector of $\angle BPA$. This means $\Phi(M_1 )$ is the point at infinity along $PM_1$, and this lies on $\mathcal{L}_1. $
Now, $P,\Phi(M_2 ),M_2$ are clearly collinear by Thales as $90^\circ+90^\circ=180^\circ. $
\[\angle M_2 AB+\angle M_1 PA=(180^\circ-\angle BPA)/2+(\angle BPA)/2=90^\circ\]Hence $PM_1\perp A\Phi(M_2 )$ which implies $P\Phi(M_2 )\parallel A\Phi(M_2 )$. Analogously, we get $B\Phi(M_2 )\parallel P\Phi(M_2 )$. This implies that $\Phi(M_2 )$ is the point at infinity along $PM_2$.

Both $\Phi(M_1 )$ and $\Phi(M_2 )$ belong to $\mathcal{L}_1$ as $M_1,M_2$ lie on $l_1$. This means that $\mathcal{L}_1$ has two distinct points at infinity (Note the parallel lines were orthogonal). As we also know that $\mathcal{L}_1$ is a conic, $\mathcal{L}_1$ must be a hyperbola.
Let $M$ be the center of the hyperbola. By definition, $M\Phi(M_1 )$ and $M\Phi(M_2 )$ are asymptotes of $\mathcal{L}_1$. But $M\Phi(M_1 )$ is parallel to $M_1 P,$ which is orthogonal to $PM_2$ by Thales as $M_1 M_2$ is a diameter of $(\triangle ABP)$. Yet $PM_2$ is parallel to $M\Phi(M_2 )$, hence
$M\Phi(M_1 )\perp M\Phi(M_2 )$
Thus $\mathcal{L}_1$ is a rectangular hyperbola.
Recall that
\[\angle PAX_1'=\angle X_1' BP\quad \Leftrightarrow\quad \angle X_1' AD=\angle CBX_1'\]Hence $X_1'$ also lies on $\mathcal{L}_1$. Note that constructing $X_1'$ is equivalent to reflection over the midpoint of $AB$ by the properties of parallelograms.
Pick a branch of the hyperbola. Reflect that branch over the midpoint of $AB$. From our previous result, this must be a component of \mathcal{L}_1. Assume for the sake of contradiction that this reflection intersects the initial branch at some point $K$, other than the midpoint of $AB$. Then $K$
is fixed upon reflection but not the center of reflection, hence lie on different half-planes: obvious contradiction.
Else, the reflection is distinct from the initial branch, yet part of $\mathcal{L}_1$, hence it is precisely the other branch of the hyperbola. This implies that the center of $\mathcal{L}_1$, $M$, is indeed the midpoint of $AB$. Note that even when we have $K$ as the midpoint of $AB$, for $K$ to lie on $\mathcal{L}_1$, it must have multiplicity $2$, one count from each branch of $\mathcal{L}_1$. Hence if we consider multiplicity, the midpoint of $AB$ is still the center of reflection hence the center of $\mathcal{L}_1$.
Hence $M$ is always the midpoint of $AB$.

Consequently, the asymptotes of $\mathcal{L}_1$ are more specifically the lines respectively parallel to, and perpendicular to the angle bisector of $\angle BPA$ through $M$.
Now consider the locus of points $X_2$ such that $\angle ADX_2=\angle X_2 CB$. From all our previous reasoning, say by relabeling:
\[A\Leftrightarrow D,B\Leftrightarrow C,X_1\Leftrightarrow X_2,X_1'\Leftrightarrow X_2'\]And so on. We have an analogous result for the locus of $X_2$, which in our original diagram is a rectangular hyperbola $\mathcal{L}_2$ with center $N$, which is the midpoint of $CD$. Its asymptotes are respectively the lines parallel to, and perpendicular to, the angle bisector of $\angle BPA$ through $N$.
The locus of points $X$ satisfying the constraints in the problem is simply the intersection of $\mathcal{L}_1$ and $\mathcal{L}_2$.
Bézout’s Theorem: If two plane algebraic curves of degrees $d_1$ and $d_2$ have no component in common, they have $d_1 d_2$ intersection points, counted with their multiplicity, and including points at infinity and points with complex coordinates.
The two rectangular hyperbolas each have degree $2$. Hence by Bézout’s Theorem, there are $4$ intersection points. First of all, the points at infinity along the angle bisector of $\angle BPA$ and the orthogonal line, both of which lie on both $\mathcal{L}_1$ and $\mathcal{L}_2$ contribute to two intersection points, and are distinct. Further, as $P,A,D$ and $P,B,C$ are collinear, $P$ also lies on $\mathcal{L}_1$ and $\mathcal{L}_2$. This gives another intersection point, which lies on a different plane to the points at infinity hence is distinct.
Note that P, and points at infinity, are outside of $ABCD$. We already know our point $X'$ from before satisfies the problem’s conditions, and since we constructed this point it must exist. If this is in the exterior of our quadrilateral, then no other point $X$ satisfying the conditions of the problem, can exist in the interior of $ABCD$ as we already have counted $4$ intersection points, hence the problem is vacuously true. Else, it is in the interior of the quadrilateral. Then, there are exactly $1+1+1+1=4$ intersection points already, which is the exact number allowed by Bézout, hence $X'$ is the unique point inside $ABCD$ that works.
In fact, this means $X'=X$ by uniqueness.
Hence, returning to our problem, by cyclic quadrilaterals,
\[\angle APE=\angle ADX\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \angle EPB=\angle XCB\]Hence,
\[\angle AYB=\angle APB=\angle ADX+\angle XCB=2\angle ADX\]Because $\angle ADX=\angle XCB$ from the problem, and since $APYB$ is cyclic.

This concludes the problem.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
InterLoop
280 posts
#28 • 1 Y
Y by OronSH
idk what in the world above is but here's another cs sol
solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Nari_Tom
117 posts
#29
Y by
Here is another nice solution using Gliding principle.

Let $P$ and $Q$ be the reflection of $X$ over $BC$ and $AD$. Let $M$ and $N$ be the midpoints of $BA$ and $CD$. Let $E$ and $F$ be the projections of $X$ to $BC$ and $AD$.

Since $BPCX$ and $ACDQ$ are similar kites By the Gliding principle we have $MENF$ is similar too.

Let $G$ and $Y'$ be the points on perpendicular bisector of $AB$ such that $BGAY'$ and $EMFN$ are similar kites. Since $\frac{BE}{EC}=\frac{AF}{AD}=\frac{GM}{MY'}$, by the gliding principle we have $\triangle BGA \sim \triangle EMF \sim \triangle CY'D$, which means that $Y'$ lies on perpendicular bisector of $CD$ $\implies$ $Y'=Y$. Conclusion follows.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a