We have your learning goals covered with Spring and Summer courses available. Enroll today!

Contests & Programs AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
3 M G
BBookmark  VNew Topic kLocked
Contests & Programs AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
3 M G
BBookmark  VNew Topic kLocked
G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a March Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Mar 2, 2025
March is the month for State MATHCOUNTS competitions! Kudos to everyone who participated in their local chapter competitions and best of luck to all going to State! Join us on March 11th for a Math Jam devoted to our favorite Chapter competition problems! Are you interested in training for MATHCOUNTS? Be sure to check out our AMC 8/MATHCOUNTS Basics and Advanced courses.

Are you ready to level up with Olympiad training? Registration is open with early bird pricing available for our WOOT programs: MathWOOT (Levels 1 and 2), CodeWOOT, PhysicsWOOT, and ChemWOOT. What is WOOT? WOOT stands for Worldwide Online Olympiad Training and is a 7-month high school math Olympiad preparation and testing program that brings together many of the best students from around the world to learn Olympiad problem solving skills. Classes begin in September!

Do you have plans this summer? There are so many options to fit your schedule and goals whether attending a summer camp or taking online classes, it can be a great break from the routine of the school year. Check out our summer courses at AoPS Online, or if you want a math or language arts class that doesn’t have homework, but is an enriching summer experience, our AoPS Virtual Campus summer camps may be just the ticket! We are expanding our locations for our AoPS Academies across the country with 15 locations so far and new campuses opening in Saratoga CA, Johns Creek GA, and the Upper West Side NY. Check out this page for summer camp information.

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]March 5th (Wednesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, HCSSiM Math Jam 2025. Amber Verser, Assistant Director of the Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics, will host an information session about HCSSiM, a summer program for high school students.
[*]March 6th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar on Math Competitions from elementary through high school. Join us for an enlightening session that demystifies the world of math competitions and helps you make informed decisions about your contest journey.
[*]March 11th (Tuesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS Chapter Discussion MATH JAM. AoPS instructors will discuss some of their favorite problems from the MATHCOUNTS Chapter Competition. All are welcome!
[*]March 13th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar about Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus. Transform your summer into an unforgettable learning adventure! From elementary through high school, we offer dynamic summer camps featuring topics in mathematics, language arts, and competition preparation - all designed to fit your schedule and ignite your passion for learning.[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Friday, Mar 28 - Jul 18
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Jul 8
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21


Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jul 20
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 16 - Jun 8
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Monday, Mar 17 - Jun 9
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Tuesday, Mar 4 - Aug 12
Sunday, Mar 23 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Mar 16 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 23 - Aug 3
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Sunday, Mar 16 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Wednesday, Mar 5 - May 21
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Sunday, Mar 30 - Oct 5
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jun 15
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Tuesday, Mar 4 - May 20
Monday, Mar 31 - Jun 23
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Monday, Mar 24 - Jun 16
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Sunday, Mar 30 - Jun 22
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Mar 2, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
Base 2n of n^k
KevinYang2.71   42
N 11 minutes ago by sansgankrsngupta
Source: USAMO 2025/1, USAJMO 2025/2
Let $k$ and $d$ be positive integers. Prove that there exists a positive integer $N$ such that for every odd integer $n>N$, the digits in the base-$2n$ representation of $n^k$ are all greater than $d$.
42 replies
KevinYang2.71
Mar 20, 2025
sansgankrsngupta
11 minutes ago
Guessing with intervals
navi_09220114   1
N an hour ago by ja.
Source: Malaysian IMO TST 2025 P2
Let $n\ge 4$ be a positive integer. Megavan and Minivan are playing a game, where Megavan secretly chooses a real number $x$ in $[0, 1]$. At the start of the game, the only information Minivan has about $x$ is $x$ in $[0, 1]$. He needs to now learn about $x$ based on the following protocols: at each turn of his, Minivan chooses a number $y$ and submits to Megavan, where Megavan replies immediately with one of $y > x$, $y < x$, or $y\simeq x$, subject to two rules:

$\bullet$ The answers in the form of $y > x$ and $y < x$ must be truthful;

$\bullet$ Define the score of a round, known only to Megavan, as follows: $0$ if the answer is in the form $y > x$ and $y < x$, and $|x - y|$ if in the form $y\simeq x$. Then for every positive integer $k$ and every $k$ consecutive rounds, at least one round has score no more than $\frac{1}{k + 1}$.

Minivan's goal is to produce numbers $a, b$ such that $a\le x\le b$ and $b - a\le \frac 1n$. Let $f(n)$ be the minimum number of queries that Minivan needs in order to guarantee success, regardless of Megavan's strategy. Prove that $$n\le f(n) \le 4n$$
Proposed by Anzo Teh Zhao Yang
1 reply
navi_09220114
Yesterday at 12:55 PM
ja.
an hour ago
permutations of sets
cloventeen   1
N an hour ago by alexheinis
Find the number of permutations of the set \( A = (1, 2, \dots, n) \) with the set \( B = (1, 1, 2, 3, \dots, n) \) such that each element in the permutations has at most one immediate neighbor greater than itself.
1 reply
cloventeen
Today at 2:36 AM
alexheinis
an hour ago
EM // AC wanted, isosceles trapezoid related
parmenides51   5
N an hour ago by Tsikaloudakis
Source: 2020 Austrian Mathematical Olympiad Junior Regional Competition , Problem 3
Given is an isosceles trapezoid $ABCD$ with $AB \parallel CD$ and $AB> CD$. The projection from $D$ on $ AB$ is $E$. The midpoint of the diagonal $BD$ is $M$. Prove that $EM$ is parallel to $AC$.

(Karl Czakler)
5 replies
parmenides51
Dec 18, 2020
Tsikaloudakis
an hour ago
triangles with equal areas
mathuz   7
N an hour ago by Tsikaloudakis
Source: SRMC 2023, P1
Let $ABCD$ be a trapezoid with $AD\parallel BC$. A point $M $ is chosen inside the trapezoid, and a point $N$ is chosen inside the triangle $BMC$ such that $AM\parallel CN$, $BM\parallel DN$. Prove that triangles $ABN$ and $CDM$ have equal areas.
7 replies
1 viewing
mathuz
Dec 28, 2023
Tsikaloudakis
an hour ago
number theory
karimeow   0
2 hours ago
Prove that there exist infinitely many positive integers m such that the equation (xz+1)(yz+1) = mz^3 + 1 has infinitely many positive integer solutions.
0 replies
karimeow
2 hours ago
0 replies
Eventually constant sequence with condition
PerfectPlayer   3
N 2 hours ago by egxa
Source: Turkey TST 2025 Day 3 P8
A positive real number sequence $a_1, a_2, a_3,\dots $ and a positive integer \(s\) is given.
Let $f_n(0) = \frac{a_n+\dots+a_1}{n}$ and for each $0<k<n$
\[f_n(k)=\frac{a_n+\dots+a_{k+1}}{n-k}-\frac{a_k+\dots+a_1}{k}\]Then for every integer $n\geq s,$ the condition
\[a_{n+1}=\max_{0\leq k<n}(f_n(k))\]is satisfied. Prove that this sequence must be eventually constant.
3 replies
PerfectPlayer
Mar 18, 2025
egxa
2 hours ago
A lot of tangent circle
ItzsleepyXD   2
N 2 hours ago by WLOGQED1729
Source: Own
Let \( \triangle ABC \) be a triangle with circumcircle \( \omega \) and circumcenter \( O \). Let \( \omega_A \) and \( I_A \) represent the \( A \)-excircle and \( A \)-excenter, respectively. Denote by \( \omega_B \) the circle tangent to \( AB \), \( BC \), and \( \omega \) on the arc \( BC \) not containing \( A \), and similarly for \( \omega_C \). Let the tangency points of \( \omega_A, \omega_B, \omega_C \) with line \( BC \) be \( X, Y, Z \), respectively. Let \( P \neq A \) be the intersection point of \( (AYZ) \) and \( \omega \). Define \( Q \) as the point on segment \( OI_A \) such that \( 2 \cdot OQ = QI_A \). Suppose that \( XP \) intersects \( \omega \) again at \( R \). Let \( T \) be the touch point of the \( A \)-mixtilinear incircle and \( \omega \), and let \( A' \) be the antipode of \( A \) with respect to \( \omega \). Let \( S \) be the intersection of \( A'Q \) and \( I_AT \).

Show that the line \( RS \) is the radical axis of \( \omega_B \) and \( \omega_C \).
2 replies
ItzsleepyXD
2 hours ago
WLOGQED1729
2 hours ago
deduction from function
MetaphysicalWukong   3
N 2 hours ago by pco
can we then deduce that h has exactly 1 zero?
3 replies
MetaphysicalWukong
3 hours ago
pco
2 hours ago
number theory question?
jag11   3
N 2 hours ago by Anabcde
Find the smallest positive integer n such that n is a multiple of 11, n +1 is a multiple of 10, n + 2 is a
multiple of 9, n + 3 is a multiple of 8, n +4 is a multiple of 7, n +5 is a multiple of 6, n +6 is a multiple of
5, n + 7 is a multiple of 4, n + 8 is a multiple of 3, and n + 9 is a multiple of 2.

I tried doing the mods and simplifying it but I'm kinda confused.
3 replies
jag11
Yesterday at 10:41 PM
Anabcde
2 hours ago
Circles and Chords
steven_zhang123   0
2 hours ago
(1) Let \( A \) , \( B \) and \( C \) be points on circle \( O \) divided into three equal parts. Construct three equal circles \( O_1 \), \( O_2 \), and \( O_3 \) tangent to \( O \) internally at points \( A \), \( B \), and \( C \) respectively. Let \( P \) be any point on arc \( AC \), and draw tangents \( PD \), \( PE \), and \( PF \) to circles \( O_1 \), \( O_2 \), and \( O_3 \) respectively. Prove that \( PE = PD + PF \).

(2) Let \( A_1 \), \( A_2 \), \( \cdots \), \( A_n \) be points on circle \( O \) divided into \( n \) equal parts. Construct \( n \) equal circles \( O_1 \), \( O_2 \), \( \cdots \), \( O_n \) tangent to \( O \) internally at \( A_1 \), \( A_2 \), \( \cdots \), \( A_n \). Let \( P \) be any point on circle \( O \), and draw tangents \( PB_1 \), \( PB_2 \), \( \cdots \), \( PB_n \) to circles \( O_1 \), \( O_2 \), \( \cdots \), \( O_n \). If the sum of \( k \) of \( PB_1 \), \( PB_2 \), \( \cdots \), \( PB_n \) equals the sum of the remaining \( n-k \) (where \( n \geq k \geq 1 \)), find all such \( n \).
0 replies
steven_zhang123
2 hours ago
0 replies
Distributing cupcakes
KevinYang2.71   18
N 4 hours ago by MathLuis
Source: USAMO 2025/6
Let $m$ and $n$ be positive integers with $m\geq n$. There are $m$ cupcakes of different flavors arranged around a circle and $n$ people who like cupcakes. Each person assigns a nonnegative real number score to each cupcake, depending on how much they like the cupcake. Suppose that for each person $P$, it is possible to partition the circle of $m$ cupcakes into $n$ groups of consecutive cupcakes so that the sum of $P$'s scores of the cupcakes in each group is at least $1$. Prove that it is possible to distribute the $m$ cupcakes to the $n$ people so that each person $P$ receives cupcakes of total score at least $1$ with respect to $P$.
18 replies
KevinYang2.71
Friday at 12:00 PM
MathLuis
4 hours ago
usamOOK geometry
KevinYang2.71   73
N 4 hours ago by deduck
Source: USAMO 2025/4, USAJMO 2025/5
Let $H$ be the orthocenter of acute triangle $ABC$, let $F$ be the foot of the altitude from $C$ to $AB$, and let $P$ be the reflection of $H$ across $BC$. Suppose that the circumcircle of triangle $AFP$ intersects line $BC$ at two distinct points $X$ and $Y$. Prove that $C$ is the midpoint of $XY$.
73 replies
KevinYang2.71
Friday at 12:00 PM
deduck
4 hours ago
Gunn Math Competition
the_math_prodigy   15
N 4 hours ago by the_math_prodigy
Gunn Math Circle is excited to host the fourth annual Gunn Math Competition (GMC)! GMC will take place at Gunn High School in Palo Alto, California on Sunday, March 30th. Gather a team of up to four and compete for over $7,500 in prizes! The contest features three rounds: Individual, Guts, and Team. We welcome participants of all skill levels, with separate Beginner and Advanced divisions for all students.

Registration is free and now open at compete.gunnmathcircle.org. The deadline to sign up is March 27th.

Special Guest Speaker: Po-Shen Loh!!!
We are honored to welcome Po-Shen Loh, a world-renowned mathematician, Carnegie Mellon professor, and former coach of the USA International Math Olympiad team. He will deliver a 30-minute talk to both students and parents, offering deep insights into mathematical thinking and problem-solving in the age of AI!

View competition manual, schedule, prize pool at compete.gunnmathcircle.org . For any questions, reach out at ghsmathcircle@gmail.com or ask in Discord.
15 replies
the_math_prodigy
Mar 8, 2025
the_math_prodigy
4 hours ago
0 on jmo
Rong0625   42
N Yesterday at 4:42 PM by llddmmtt1
How many people actually get a flat 0/42 on jmo? I took it for the first time this year and I had never done oly math before so I really only had 2 weeks to figure it out since I didn’t think I would qual. I went in not expecting much but I didn’t think I wouldn’t be able to get ANYTHING. So I’m pretty sure I got 0/42 (unless i get pity points for writing incorrect solutions). Is that bad, am I sped, and should I be embarrassed? Or do other people actually also get 0?
42 replies
Rong0625
Friday at 12:14 PM
llddmmtt1
Yesterday at 4:42 PM
0 on jmo
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Rong0625
15 posts
#1
Y by
How many people actually get a flat 0/42 on jmo? I took it for the first time this year and I had never done oly math before so I really only had 2 weeks to figure it out since I didn’t think I would qual. I went in not expecting much but I didn’t think I wouldn’t be able to get ANYTHING. So I’m pretty sure I got 0/42 (unless i get pity points for writing incorrect solutions). Is that bad, am I sped, and should I be embarrassed? Or do other people actually also get 0?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Pengu14
435 posts
#2
Y by
Last year, 20 people out of 261 got 0.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
vincentwant
1263 posts
#3
Y by
Will probably be higher this year because j1 and j4 were impossible
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Schintalpati
597 posts
#4
Y by
Rong0625 wrote:
How many people actually get a flat 0/42 on jmo? I took it for the first time this year and I had never done oly math before so I really only had 2 weeks to figure it out since I didn’t think I would qual. I went in not expecting much but I didn’t think I wouldn’t be able to get ANYTHING. So I’m pretty sure I got 0/42 (unless i get pity points for writing incorrect solutions). Is that bad, am I sped, and should I be embarrassed? Or do other people actually also get 0?

Tbh I expected I was gonna get a 0 to cuz I was more focused on MathCounts and saving oly prep for after nats. Although I did prolly end up with like a 7-8/42, I went into day 2 looked at the test and immediately thought I was gonna get a 0 cuz I had I think in all JMO prep I had ever done to that point, done 2 JMO questions. 2023 p1 and 2024 p1. Luckily I managed to suck out all my brain info and finish up my #4 proof in the last 3 minutes. I also in somewhat of a way terribly "sillied" p1 and solved the wrong problem :skull: polynomials instead of functions. But, you'll be fine, a 0 is quite common and we hopefully got next year dw, so just be happy and proud you qualified to JMO cuz that's what matters!
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by Schintalpati, Friday at 10:37 PM
Reason: .
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MathFun1000
128 posts
#6
Y by
vincentwant wrote:
Will probably be higher this year because j1 and j4 were impossible

j4 was pretty doable along with j2, j1 was hard though
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
xTimmyG
252 posts
#7
Y by
vincentwant wrote:
Will probably be higher this year because j1 and j4 were impossible

j1 was hard, but j4 was quite easy. at least >100 people swept day 2
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Pengu14
435 posts
#8
Y by
MathFun1000 wrote:
vincentwant wrote:
Will probably be higher this year because j1 and j4 were impossible

j4 was pretty doable along with j2, j1 was hard though

J1 was way easier than J2
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
eg4334
614 posts
#9
Y by
this year getting a 0 will probably be very common given there weren't many problems very accessible to people without olympiad training unlike last year which had p1 and p4 on jmo

@below, ok thats true p5 is very accessible but since its not a 1/4 not many beginners may give it a serious try
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by eg4334, Friday at 10:55 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
xTimmyG
252 posts
#10
Y by
eg4334 wrote:
this year getting a 0 will probably be very common given there weren't many problems very accessible to people without olympiad training unlike last year which had p1 and p4 on jmo

cmon even aime quals know what power of a point is (or coordbashing) for p5. anyone who jmo qualed legitimately should be able to solve
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
rhydon516
537 posts
#11
Y by
xTimmyG wrote:
eg4334 wrote:
this year getting a 0 will probably be very common given there weren't many problems very accessible to people without olympiad training unlike last year which had p1 and p4 on jmo

cmon even aime quals know what power of a point is (or coordbashing) for p5. anyone who jmo qualed legitimately should be able to solve

oopsie :blush:

but seriously, no one "should be able to solve" anything. maybe they didn't spend enough time on j5, or they had a bad day, or (for all those geo antimains out there) they just aren't very good at geometry (yes, this includes coordbash). neither is it productive to shame people in such an elitist tone for anything.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by rhydon516, Yesterday at 11:27 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
S.Das93
706 posts
#12
Y by
xTimmyG wrote:
eg4334 wrote:
this year getting a 0 will probably be very common given there weren't many problems very accessible to people without olympiad training unlike last year which had p1 and p4 on jmo

cmon even aime quals know what power of a point is (or coordbashing) for p5. anyone who jmo qualed legitimately should be able to solve

what if
the person is cursed with illegitimacy

what if they not only qualified illegitimately
but they were born illegitimately
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Schintalpati
597 posts
#13
Y by
xTimmyG wrote:
eg4334 wrote:
this year getting a 0 will probably be very common given there weren't many problems very accessible to people without olympiad training unlike last year which had p1 and p4 on jmo

cmon even aime quals know what power of a point is (or coordbashing) for p5. anyone who jmo qualed legitimately should be able to solve

Bro this guy is not real. I didn't oly prep at all cuz of mathcounts state prioritizing but got p4 only cuz I spent all 4.5 hours on it. Didn't even consider looking at p5, cuz of it being p5 and I suck at geo, so I was a diagram starer. All that to say, people can most definitely get a 0 and p5 was not that trivial to "no oly prep" people:skull:
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Schintalpati, Friday at 11:02 PM
Reason: .
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Alex_Yang
422 posts
#14
Y by
vincentwant wrote:
Will probably be higher this year because j1 and j4 were impossible

first part is true second part is anything but true
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
vincentwant
1263 posts
#15
Y by
xTimmyG wrote:
vincentwant wrote:
Will probably be higher this year because j1 and j4 were impossible

j1 was hard, but j4 was quite easy. at least >100 people swept day 2

personally i found j4 to be harder
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HOFer
21 posts
#16
Y by
all of you guys know that im a bum but im pretty sure even i can get a nonzero score on JMO
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
hellohannah
20 posts
#17
Y by
i think 0 on jmo is pretty reasonable this year, p1/4 didn't feel very "beginner friendly"
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HOFer
21 posts
#18
Y by
hellohannah wrote:
i think 0 on jmo is pretty reasonable this year, p1/4 didn't feel very "beginner friendly"

i dont understand the hard part about "coordbashing p5"
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Schintalpati
597 posts
#19
Y by
HOFer wrote:
hellohannah wrote:
i think 0 on jmo is pretty reasonable this year, p1/4 didn't feel very "beginner friendly"

i dont understand the hard part about "coordbashing p5"

I haven't seen many oly geo problems, so I didn't even consider coordbashing or take time to think to hard on p5 cuz of its place
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HOFer
21 posts
#20
Y by
Schintalpati wrote:
HOFer wrote:
hellohannah wrote:
i think 0 on jmo is pretty reasonable this year, p1/4 didn't feel very "beginner friendly"

i dont understand the hard part about "coordbashing p5"

I haven't seen many oly geo problems, so I didn't even consider coordbashing or take time to think to hard on p5 cuz of its place

is your first instinct when you see a geo problem that you dont know how to do but looks coordbashable - not coordbashing?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Schintalpati
597 posts
#21
Y by
no dawg its not :skull: I didn't even think it looked coordbashable I was more tryna find a homothety synthetic solution but instead became a diagram starer
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Pengu14
435 posts
#22
Y by
Schintalpati wrote:
no dawg its not :skull: I didn't even think it looked coordbashable I was more tryna find a homothety synthetic solution but instead became a diagram starer

This was me until i remembered i have skissue lol
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
hellohannah
20 posts
#23
Y by
HOFer wrote:
hellohannah wrote:
i think 0 on jmo is pretty reasonable this year, p1/4 didn't feel very "beginner friendly"

i dont understand the hard part about "coordbashing p5"

in contest it didnt look very coord bashable to me... i feel like for someone new to oly they wouldnt really be familiar with coord bashing and it doesn't feel very intuitive on this problem

also it's fairly easy to make a mistake while bashing, and making mistakes while bashing is like 10x more likely if you're new to oly
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
KevinChen_Yay
204 posts
#24
Y by
i feel like the most accessible was p4 but maybe some jmo quals don't know induction idk

p5 def isn't that ez to think of because even experienced ppl don't think of coordbashing when they see geo or even after they tried PoP or smth but failed
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Schintalpati
597 posts
#25
Y by
KevinChen_Yay wrote:
i feel like the most accessible was p4 but maybe some jmo quals don't know induction idk

p5 def isn't that ez to think of because even experienced ppl don't think of coordbashing when they see geo or even after they tried PoP or smth but failed

bruh was I the only person who didn't even consider induction for p4. Bounding seemed much more straightforward
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
llddmmtt1
392 posts
#26
Y by
KevinChen_Yay wrote:
i feel like the most accessible was p4 but maybe some jmo quals don't know induction idk

p5 def isn't that ez to think of because even experienced ppl don't think of coordbashing when they see geo or even after they tried PoP or smth but failed

haha in 2023 jmo i was so inexperienced that i only knew to coordbash 2023 jmo 2
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
hellohannah
20 posts
#27
Y by
KevinChen_Yay wrote:
i feel like the most accessible was p4 but maybe some jmo quals don't know induction idk

p5 def isn't that ez to think of because even experienced ppl don't think of coordbashing when they see geo or even after they tried PoP or smth but failed

p4 just looks scary tbh

i didn't try it for a while cuz it looked annoying
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
KevinChen_Yay
204 posts
#28
Y by
Schintalpati wrote:
bruh was I the only person who didn't even consider induction for p4. Bounding seemed much more straightforward

yea induction def wasn't that straightforward, but should be clear if ur struggling to find another sol; if u actually solved without induction then that's very orz lol
llddmmtt1 wrote:
haha in 2023 jmo i was so inexperienced that i only knew to coordbash 2023 jmo 2

W i actually did coordbash for 2024 j1 lol (without even trying any other method :skul:)
hellohannah wrote:
p4 just looks scary tbh

i didn't try it for a while cuz it looked annoying

same, it was the second question I attempted after p5
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by KevinChen_Yay, Yesterday at 1:38 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ethan2011
225 posts
#30
Y by
vincentwant wrote:
Will probably be higher this year because j1 and j4 were impossible

j4 was not impossible, it's trivial by induction
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
drhong
94 posts
#31
Y by
xTimmyG wrote:
eg4334 wrote:
this year getting a 0 will probably be very common given there weren't many problems very accessible to people without olympiad training unlike last year which had p1 and p4 on jmo

cmon even aime quals know what power of a point is (or coordbashing) for p5. anyone who jmo qualed legitimately should be able to solve

timmy i agree with you on some things, but sometimes i think your a bit too extreme. i think its very possible for someone to legitimately qual and get a 0.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
hgomamogh
36 posts
#32
Y by
rhydon516 wrote:
or (for all those antigeo mains out there) they just aren't very good at geometry.

This just doesn't make sense at all. U4/J5 was probably easier using coordinate bashing techniques than synthetic geometry techniques.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
LearnMath_105
134 posts
#33
Y by
i feel for p5 you couldnt see that OC /perp BC implies the result without at least a little oly experience so a lot of people didnt see the cordbash
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
xTimmyG
252 posts
#34
Y by
LearnMath_105 wrote:
i feel for p5 you couldnt see that OC /perp BC implies the result without at least a little oly experience so a lot of people didnt see the cordbash

literally anyone with above middle school math knowledge knows that. also the problem was just a bit harder than last year j1, considering i've never practiced synthetic (only bash) but i still solved it synthetically in 10 minutes
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sadas123
1072 posts
#35
Y by
xTimmyG wrote:
LearnMath_105 wrote:
i feel for p5 you couldnt see that OC /perp BC implies the result without at least a little oly experience so a lot of people didnt see the cordbash

literally anyone with above middle school math knowledge knows that. also the problem was just a bit harder than last year j1, considering i've never practiced synthetic (only bash) but i still solved it synthetically in 10 minutes

I think that xTimmyG got a perfect on JMO
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by sadas123, Yesterday at 2:55 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
xTimmyG
252 posts
#36
Y by
sadas123 wrote:
I think that xTimmyG got a perfect on JMO

unfortunately i didnt, i just posted my predicted score on my blog. in fact, i haven't heard of anyone who solved all the problems yet
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by xTimmyG, Yesterday at 2:59 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
vincentwant
1263 posts
#37
Y by
xTimmyG wrote:
sadas123 wrote:
I think that xTimmyG got a perfect on JMO

unfortunately i didnt. in fact, i haven't heard of anyone who solved all the problems yet

i almost did but my p6 sol was flawed :(
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sadas123
1072 posts
#38
Y by
xTimmyG wrote:
sadas123 wrote:
I think that xTimmyG got a perfect on JMO

unfortunately i didnt, i just posted my predicted score on my blog. in fact, i haven't heard of anyone who solved all the problems yet

Is it possible for a 6th grader to make USA(J)MO? Do you guys know anyone?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
lpieleanu
2811 posts
#39
Y by
sadas123 wrote:
xTimmyG wrote:
sadas123 wrote:
I think that xTimmyG got a perfect on JMO

unfortunately i didnt, i just posted my predicted score on my blog. in fact, i haven't heard of anyone who solved all the problems yet

Is it possible for a 6th grader to make USA(J)MO? Do you guys know anyone?

A fourth grader has qualified in the past for USAJMO.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Pengu14
435 posts
#40
Y by
lpieleanu wrote:
A fourth grader has qualified in the past for USAJMO.

Dotted?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
fake123
39 posts
#41
Y by
i think luke robitaille
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sadas123
1072 posts
#42
Y by
Pengu14 wrote:
lpieleanu wrote:
A fourth grader has qualified in the past for USAJMO.

Dotted?

Probably......
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
elizhang101412
1185 posts
#43
Y by
Pengu14 wrote:
lpieleanu wrote:
A fourth grader has qualified in the past for USAJMO.

Dotted?

no
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sadas123
1072 posts
#44
Y by
elizhang101412 wrote:
Pengu14 wrote:
lpieleanu wrote:
A fourth grader has qualified in the past for USAJMO.

Dotted?

no

Then who?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
llddmmtt1
392 posts
#45
Y by
luke, probably
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a