Join our free webinar April 22 to learn about competitive programming!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
density over modulo M
SomeGuy3335   3
N 12 minutes ago by ja.
Let $M$ be a positive integer and let $\alpha$ be an irrational number. Show that for every integer $0\leq a < M$, there exists a positive integer $n$ such that $M \mid \lfloor{n \alpha}\rfloor-a$.
3 replies
SomeGuy3335
Apr 20, 2025
ja.
12 minutes ago
AGI-Origin Solves Full IMO 2020–2024 Benchmark Without Solver (30/30) beat Alpha
AGI-Origin   0
33 minutes ago
Hello IMO community,

I’m sharing here a full 30-problem solution set to all IMO problems from 2020 to 2024.

Standard AI: Prompt --> Symbolic Solver (SymPy, Geometry API, etc.)

Unlike AlphaGeometry or symbolic math tools that solve through direct symbolic computation, AGI-Origin operates via recursive symbolic cognition.

AGI-Origin:
Prompt --> Internal symbolic mapping --> Recursive contradiction/repair --> Structural reasoning --> Human-style proof

It builds human-readable logic paths by recursively tracing contradictions, repairing structure, and collapsing ambiguity — not by invoking any external symbolic solver.

These results were produced by a recursive symbolic cognition framework called AGI-Origin, designed to simulate semi-AGI through contradiction collapse, symbolic feedback, and recursion-based error repair.

These were solved without using any symbolic computation engine or solver.
Instead, the solutions were derived using a recursive symbolic framework called AGI-Origin, based on:
- Contradiction collapse
- Self-correcting recursion
- Symbolic anchoring and logical repair

Full PDF: [Upload to Dropbox/Google Drive/Notion or arXiv link when ready]

This effort surpasses AlphaGeometry’s previous 25/30 mark by covering:
- Algebra
- Combinatorics
- Geometry
- Functional Equations

Each solution follows a rigorous logical path and is written in fully human-readable format — no machine code or symbolic solvers were used.

I would greatly appreciate any feedback on the solution structure, logic clarity, or symbolic methodology.

Thank you!

— AGI-Origin Team
AGI-Origin.com
0 replies
+4 w
AGI-Origin
33 minutes ago
0 replies
Diophantine equation !
ComplexPhi   5
N an hour ago by aops.c.c.
Source: Romania JBMO TST 2015 Day 1 Problem 4
Solve in nonnegative integers the following equation :
$$21^x+4^y=z^2$$
5 replies
ComplexPhi
May 14, 2015
aops.c.c.
an hour ago
Combo problem
soryn   0
an hour ago
The school A has m1 boys and m2 girls, and ,the school B has n1 boys and n2 girls. Each school is represented by one team formed by p students,boys and girls. If f(k) is the number of cases for which,the twice schools has,togheter k girls, fund f(k) and the valute of k, for which f(k) is maximum.
0 replies
soryn
an hour ago
0 replies
No more topics!
Point on hypotenuse making the two inradii equal
YESMAths   17
N Feb 5, 2022 by NTistrulove
Source: INMO 2016 Problem 5
Let $ABC$ be a right-angle triangle with $\angle B=90^{\circ}$. Let $D$ be a point on $AC$ such that the inradii of the triangles $ABD$ and $CBD$ are equal. If this common value is $r^{\prime}$ and if $r$ is the inradius of triangle $ABC$, prove that
\[ \cfrac{1}{r'}=\cfrac{1}{r}+\cfrac{1}{BD}. \]
17 replies
YESMAths
Jan 17, 2016
NTistrulove
Feb 5, 2022
Point on hypotenuse making the two inradii equal
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: INMO 2016 Problem 5
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
YESMAths
829 posts
#1 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Let $ABC$ be a right-angle triangle with $\angle B=90^{\circ}$. Let $D$ be a point on $AC$ such that the inradii of the triangles $ABD$ and $CBD$ are equal. If this common value is $r^{\prime}$ and if $r$ is the inradius of triangle $ABC$, prove that
\[ \cfrac{1}{r'}=\cfrac{1}{r}+\cfrac{1}{BD}. \]
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Luis González
4147 posts
#2 • 11 Y
Y by Re1gnover, Ankoganit, TheOneYouWant, YESMAths, anantmudgal09, darthsid, cr1, Viswanath, enhanced, Adventure10, Mango247
We use standard notation $BC=a,$ $CA=b,$ $AB=c$ and $s=\tfrac{1}{2}(a+b+c).$ Thus letting $I_1$ and $I_2$ be the incenters of $\triangle ABD$ and $\triangle CBD,$ we get:

$[ABC]=[BI_1D]+[BI_2D]+[ABI_1]+[CBI_2]+[AI_1D]+[CI_2D]=$

$=r' \cdot BD+\tfrac{1}{2}r' \cdot (a+b+c)=r' \cdot (BD+s) \Longrightarrow$

$BD=\frac{[ABC]}{r'}-s=\frac{[ABC]}{r'}-\frac{[ABC]}{r}=[ABC] \cdot \left (\frac{1}{r'}-\frac{1}{r} \right) \ (\star).$

But from Cono Sur 1994 (P6), we have $[ABC]=BD^2.$ Thus combining with $(\star)$ gives

$BD=BD^2 \cdot \left (\frac{1}{r'}-\frac{1}{r} \right) \Longrightarrow \ \frac{1}{r'}=\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{BD}.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TheOneYouWant
963 posts
#3 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Thanks Luis Gonzalez, almost everyone were stuck with the Cono Sur problem lemma... :P
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Luis González
4147 posts
#4 • 4 Y
Y by anantmudgal09, TheOneYouWant, AnArtist, Adventure10
Generalization: $D$ is a point on the side $\overline{BC}$ of $\triangle ABC,$ such that the inradii of $\triangle ABD$ and $\triangle ACD$ are equal to $\varrho.$ If $r$ is the inradius of $\triangle ABC,$ then we have the relation:
\[ \frac{1}{\varrho}=\frac{1}{r}+\cot \frac{A}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{AD}\]
As before, we have $[ABC]=r \cdot s=\varrho \cdot (AD+s) \ (\star)$ $\Longrightarrow \tfrac{2\varrho}{h_a}=\tfrac{a}{s+AD}.$ But from the infamous inradii problem, we have $1-\tfrac{a}{s}=\left (1-\tfrac{2\varrho}{h_a} \right)^2 \Longrightarrow$

$\frac{s-a}{s}=\left (1-\frac{a}{s+AD} \right)^2 \Longrightarrow AD= \frac{a \sqrt{s}}{\sqrt{s}-\sqrt{s-a}}-s=\sqrt{s(s-a)}=\sqrt{[ABC] \cot \frac{A}{2}}.$

Combining this latter relation with $(\star)$ yields

$\frac{1}{\varrho}-\frac{1}{r}=\frac{AD}{[ABC]}=\frac{AD}{AD^2} \cdot \cot \frac{A}{2}=\cot \frac{A}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{AD} \Longrightarrow \frac{1}{\varrho}=\frac{1}{r}+\cot \frac{A}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{AD}.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
anantmudgal09
1980 posts
#5 • 6 Y
Y by aayush-srivastava, Wizard_32, JayantJha, Anshul_singh, Adventure10, Mango247
Here is my solution using some length chasing sort of arguments. This is quite hard for an average INMO problem but nevertheless, it can be done in an hour at the most at the contest.

Let $AB=1$ and $BC=x$. Let $D$ be the point on $AC$ and let $\frac{AD}{DC}=k$. Let $[ABD]=\Delta_1$ and $[CBD]=\Delta_2$ and let $2s_1=AB+BD+DA$ and $2s_2=CB+BD+DC$.

Now, we know that $\frac{r_1}{r_2}=1=\frac{\Delta_1(2s_2)}{\Delta_2(2s_1)}=\frac{AD}{DC}\frac{x+BD+DC}{1+BD+DA}$ which is equivalent to

\begin{align*} \frac{AD}{DC}=k=\frac{1+BD}{x+BD} \end{align*}
Now, this give that $BD=\frac{kx-1}{1-k}$

However, by Stewart's theorem $AC.BD^2=CD.AB^2+AD.BC^2$ and so computing this gives that $k=\frac{x+3}{3x+1}$. and similarly we get that $BD=\frac{(x+1)}{2}$.

Now, $r=\frac{x+1-\sqrt{x^2+1}}{2}$ and that $r'=\frac{\Delta_1}{s_1}$.

Now, $[ABC]=\frac{x}{2}$ and so we have that $\Delta_1(1+k)=[ABC]$ and so $\Delta_1=\frac{x(x+3)}{8(x+1)}$.

Also, we know that $AD(1+k)=AC=\sqrt{x^2+1}$ and so $2AD=\frac{(x+3)\sqrt{x^2+1}}{2(x+1)}$ and hence, we have that

\begin{align*} r_1=r'=\frac{\frac{x(x+3)}{8(x+1)}}{\frac{1+\frac{x+1}{2}+AD}{2}}=\frac{2x(x+1)}{(x+1)^2+2x+(x+1)\sqrt{x^2+1}} \end{align*}
Now, we have that $\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{BD}=\frac{2}{x+1}+\frac{x}{x+1-\sqrt{x^2+1}}=\frac{2x(x+1)}{(x+1)^2+2x+(x+1)\sqrt{x^2+1}}$.

This completes the proof $\blacksquare$
(This was just a sketch of what the expressions come out to be and is done by hand. It's not really hard to do all the intermediate steps, just that one needs a bit of computational fortitude)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AdithyaBhaskar
652 posts
#6 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
anantmudgal09 wrote:
... just that one needs a bit of computational fortitude
Unfortunatley, I don't have it. But anyway, I mentioned Stewart's theorem, and wrote down $r' = \frac{\triangle _1}{s_1} = \frac{\triangle _2}{s_2} = \frac{\triangle_1 + \triangle_2}{s_1 + s_2} = \frac{\triangle}{s + BD}$ and thus it is enough to prove $\triangle = BD^2$ (as$ \frac{1}{r} = \frac{s}{\triangle}$). And I fooled around a bit more with this, to add up to about 2 pages in total. How much, according to you, should that fetch me?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AdithyaBhaskar
652 posts
#8 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
anantmudgal09 wrote:
AdithyaBhaskar wrote:
anantmudgal09 wrote:
... just that one needs a bit of computational fortitude
Unfortunatley, I don't have it. But anyway, I mentioned Stewart's theorem, and wrote down $r' = \frac{\triangle _1}{s_1} = \frac{\triangle _2}{s_2} = \frac{\triangle_1 + \triangle_2}{s_1 + s_2} = \frac{\triangle}{s + BD}$ and thus it is enough to prove $\triangle = BD^2$ (as$ \frac{1}{r} = \frac{s}{\triangle}$). And I fooled around a bit more with this, to add up to about 2 pages in total. How much, according to you, should that fetch me?

I don't really think that saying: "To proving $X$ it shall suffice to proving $Y$" and then not proving $Y$ is worth anything reasonable, at least not at INMO and certainly not at TST, not sure for RMO.

Hey just observed: The result that I 'had to prove' is nothing but Cono Sur 1994/6 :wallbash_red:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
kapilpavase
595 posts
#9 • 4 Y
Y by TheOneYouWant, YESMAths, Adventure10, Mango247
I think i finally have a 'not so bash ' sol to this problem :P
Denote $AD=x,CD=y,BD=z$
Indeed,it suffices to show $z^2=ac/2$
Drop perps from $D$ on $AB,BC$ and use pyth to get $$z^2=(\dfrac{yc}{b})^2+(\dfrac{xa}{b})^2$$,that is,
$$z^2=\dfrac{y^2c^2+x^2a^2}{x^2+y^2+2xy}$$.
Now compare areas of $ABD,BDC$ by using formula $\Delta=rs$ and ratios of areas of triangle with same height.We get
$$\dfrac{x}{y}=\dfrac{z+c+x}{z+a+y}=\dfrac{z+c}{z+a}$$.
So
$$z^2=\dfrac{(yc-xa)^2}{(x-y)^2}=\dfrac{y^2c^2+x^2a^2-2xayc}{x^2+y^2-2xy}$$Now compare this two equations for $z^2$, we get by componendo(or whatever you call that}$$z^2=2xayc/4xy=ac/2$$And done :)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
aditya21
717 posts
#10 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
though this question is less bashy than INMO 2015 P5, still ....

my solution sketch =

we easily get by $[ABC]=rs$ where $r$ is inradii.

we get $\frac{1}{r'}=\frac{s+BD}{[ABC]}$ where $s$ is semi-perimeter of triangle $ABC$

and hence $\frac{1}{r'}=\cfrac{1}{r}+\cfrac{1}{BD}$ is equivalent to prove that

$[ABC]=BD^2$

now since triangles $ABD,BCD$ have same inradii. than again using $[ABC]=rs$

we get $\frac{AB+BD}{AD}=\frac{BD+BC}{CD}$

which can than be bashed :P to get $2BD^2=AB.AC=2[ABC]$ as desired.

so we are done.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by aditya21, Jan 18, 2016, 4:46 PM
Reason: e
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
kapilpavase
595 posts
#11 • 19 Y
Y by PRO2000, AdithyaBhaskar, TheOneYouWant, biomathematics, tarzanjunior, darthsid, Viswanath, anantmudgal09, Ashutoshmaths, Ankoganit, Vrangr, Wizard_32, Kayak, neel02, lilavati_2005, amar_04, BVKRB-, Adventure10, Mango247
'To bash or not to bash,that is the question' describes the geos of 2016 Inmo :rotfl:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TheOneYouWant
963 posts
#12 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Exactly @ above. Infact, on the overall the paper was so bashy, in the first 2 hours i got only 0.5 problems (:P) since i was thinking up creative ideas for the others. However, in the last 2 hours reality struck and thankfully i was able to solve enough problems to pass(hopefully)...
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
anantmudgal09
1980 posts
#16 • 2 Y
Y by PRO2000, Adventure10
Amusingly, it seems that something related to this was given in An Indian Practice test
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
themathfreak
238 posts
#17 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
anantmudgal09 wrote:
Here is my solution using some length chasing sort of arguments. This is quite hard for an average INMO problem but nevertheless, it can be done in an hour at the most at the contest.

Let $AB=1$ and $BC=x$. Let $D$ be the point on $AC$ and let $\frac{AD}{DC}=k$. Let $[ABD]=\Delta_1$ and $[CBD]=\Delta_2$ and let $2s_1=AB+BD+DA$ and $2s_2=CB+BD+DC$.

Now, we know that $\frac{r_1}{r_2}=1=\frac{\Delta_1(2s_2)}{\Delta_2(2s_1)}=\frac{AD}{DC}\frac{x+BD+DC}{1+BD+DA}$ which is equivalent to

\begin{align*} \frac{AD}{DC}=k=\frac{1+BD}{x+BD} \end{align*}
Now, this give that $BD=\frac{kx-1}{1-k}$

However, by Stewart's theorem $AC.BD^2=CD.AB^2+AD.BC^2$ and so computing this gives that $k=\frac{x+3}{3x+1}$. and similarly we get that $BD=\frac{(x+1)}{2}$.

Now, $r=\frac{x+1-\sqrt{x^2+1}}{2}$ and that $r'=\frac{\Delta_1}{s_1}$.

Now, $[ABC]=\frac{x}{2}$ and so we have that $\Delta_1(1+k)=[ABC]$ and so $\Delta_1=\frac{x(x+3)}{8(x+1)}$.

Also, we know that $AD(1+k)=AC=\sqrt{x^2+1}$ and so $2AD=\frac{(x+3)\sqrt{x^2+1}}{2(x+1)}$ and hence, we have that

\begin{align*} r_1=r'=\frac{\frac{x(x+3)}{8(x+1)}}{\frac{1+\frac{x+1}{2}+AD}{2}}=\frac{2x(x+1)}{(x+1)^2+2x+(x+1)\sqrt{x^2+1}} \end{align*}
Now, we have that $\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{BD}=\frac{2}{x+1}+\frac{x}{x+1-\sqrt{x^2+1}}=\frac{2x(x+1)}{(x+1)^2+2x+(x+1)\sqrt{x^2+1}}$.

This completes the proof $\blacksquare$
(This was just a sketch of what the expressions come out to be and is done by hand. It's not really hard to do all the intermediate steps, just that one needs a bit of computational fortitude)

How can you assume AB =1
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Wizard_32
1566 posts
#18 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
themathfreak wrote:
How can you assume AB =1
Because we are dealing with ratios.
So if it is greater than (or less than) 1, the triangle would be just a scaled version of the assumed lengths (since $x$ can be anything!), and the similarity ratio would cancel out in the end, so it doesn't matter.
This assumption just eases our work :P
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Wizard_32, Dec 31, 2017, 9:39 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
PROF65
2016 posts
#19 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
http://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h1561314p9554167
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
WizardMath
2487 posts
#20 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
My solution (from two years ago):

Claim 1 : Let $ABC$ be a triangle with inradius $r$, and the point $D$ on $BC$ such that inradii of $ABD, ACD$ have a common inradius $r'$. If $s$ is the semiperimeter of $ABC$ and $BC = a$, then $AD = \sqrt{s(s-a)}$
Proof : Suppose $AD = d$, and the semiperimeters of $ABD$ and $ACD$ are $s_1, s_2$. $AB=c, AC=b$. Then $s_1+s_2=s+d$.
Similar triangles and sum of areas yield $\frac{s+d}{s}=\frac{s_1+s_2}{s}= \frac{r}{r'}=\frac{s-b}{s_1-d}  = \frac{s-c}{s_2-d} = \frac{a}{s_1+s_2-2d} = \frac{a}{s-d}$, so the claim follows. $\blacksquare$

Claim 2 : Let the height from $A$ onto $BC$ be $h$. Then $\left( 1 - \frac{2r'}{h} \right)^2 = \left( 1 - \frac{2r}{h} \right)$.
Proof : We use a
Lemma : $\frac{2r}{h} = \tan \frac{B}{2} \tan \frac{C}{2}$.
Proof of lemma : $\tan \frac{B}{2} \tan \frac{C}{2} = \sqrt{\frac{(s-c)(s-a)}{s(s-b)}} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{(s-b)(s-a)}{s(s-c)}} = \frac {s-a}{s}$. But this is the ratio of the lengths of the tangents from $A$ to the incircle and the excircle, so the ratio must equal the distance of $A$ from the "topmost" tangent of the incircle and $BC$, which equals $\frac{h-2r}{h}$. $\blacksquare$
Now applying this lemma to $ABD$, $ACD$, and multiplying the two relations together, along with an application of the lemma to $ABC$ yields Claim 2.

Now using this claim, we get $1-\frac{2r'}{h} = \sqrt{1-\frac{2r}{h}}= \sqrt{\frac{s-a}{s}} = \frac{AD}{s}$.

We come back to the main problem.
Note that $BD = \sqrt{s(s-b)} = \sqrt{\frac{ac}{2}}$.
$\frac{1}{r'} - \frac{1}{BD} = \frac{(2s+h)\cdot  BD - s h}{BD \cdot h \cdot (s-BD)} = \frac{2(ac+ab+b^2+bc) - \sqrt{2ac} \cdot (a+b+c)}{ac(a+b+c-\sqrt{2ac})} = \frac{2(ac+ab+b^2+bc) - \sqrt{2ac} \cdot (a+b+c)}{a^2b + ab^2 + abc + a^2c + ac^2 + bc^2 - ab^2 - b^3 -2ac\sqrt{ac/2})} = \frac{2(ac+ab+b^2+bc) - \sqrt{2ac} \cdot (a+b+c)}{(ab+ac+c^2-b^2)(a+b) - ((a+c)^2-b^2)\sqrt{ac/2})} = \frac{2(ac+ab+b^2+bc) - \sqrt{2ac} \cdot (a+b+c)}{(a+c-b)(a+b)(c+b) -(a+c-b)(a+b+c)\sqrt{ac/2})} = \frac{2}{a+c-b} = \frac{1}{r}$, wherein we have used $a^2 + c^2 = b^2$ and $h = \frac{ac}{b}$ and $r = s-b$. $\blacksquare$

Remark : This is essentially a brute force solution, but has an additional highlight of being able to find $BD$ generally, and also all the other lengths that are fruitful in this solution. Claim 2 can also be generalized, and for unequal radii $r_1, r_2$ instead of $r'$, we have $\left( 1 - \frac{2r_1}{h} \right) \cdot  \left( 1 - \frac{2r_2}{h} \right)= \left( 1 - \frac{2r}{h} \right)$.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by WizardMath, Feb 25, 2018, 12:22 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Wizard_32
1566 posts
#21 • 6 Y
Y by AlastorMoody, NOLF, lilavati_2005, Adventure10, Mango247, TSM_Zeki_MuREN
A year later, I tried this again, and successfully solved (bashed) this. I guess I have improved as a basher :D
YESMAths wrote:
Let $ABC$ be a right-angle triangle with $\angle B=90^{\circ}$. Let $D$ be a point on $AC$ such that the inradii of the triangles $ABD$ and $CBD$ are equal. If this common value is $r^{\prime}$ and if $r$ is the inradius of triangle $ABC$, prove that
\[ \cfrac{1}{r'}=\cfrac{1}{r}+\cfrac{1}{BD}. \]
Let $AD=x,$ and so $DC=b-x.$ Also, $AB=c, BC=a, BD=m.$ Then the condition gives
$$\frac{[ABD]}{[BDC]}=\frac{s_{ABD}}{s_{BDC}} \Leftrightarrow \frac{x}{b-x}=\frac{c+x+m}{a+b-x+m}$$This simplifies to
\begin{align*} 
x=\frac{b(c+m)}{a+c+2m} 
\end{align*}Now, $$r'=\frac{[ABD]}{s_{ABD}}=\frac{[BDC]}{s_{BDC}}=\frac{[ABD]+[BDC]}{s_{ABD}+s_{BDC}}=\frac{ac}{a+b+c+2m}$$Thus, it suffices to show
$$\frac{1}{r'}=\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{m} \Leftrightarrow \frac{a+b+c+2m}{ac}=\frac{a+b+c}{ac}+\frac{1}{m} \Leftrightarrow 2m^2=ac$$By Stewart's theorem
\begin{align*}
& a^2x+c^2(b-x)=bm^2+bx(b-x) \\
&\Leftrightarrow (a^2-c^2)x+c^2b=b^2x-bx^2+bm^2 \\
&\Leftrightarrow x(-2c^2+bx)=b(m^2-c^2) & (\text{as }a^2+c^2=b^2 )\\
\\
&\Leftrightarrow \frac{b(c+m)}{a+c+2m} \left( -2c^2+\frac{b^2(c+m)}{a+c+2m} \right)=b(m^2-c^2) \\
\\
&\Leftrightarrow -2c^2(a+c+2m)+b^2(c+m)=(m-c)(a+c+2m)^2
\end{align*}This is not much computation, and the end expression is really neat:
$$2m^3+2m^2a-mca-ca^2=0 \Leftrightarrow (2m^2-ac)(m+a)=0$$Hence, $2m^2=ac,$ as desired. $\square$
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Wizard_32, Dec 25, 2018, 9:47 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
NTistrulove
183 posts
#22
Y by
We know that $r=\frac{\Delta}{s}$ where $\Delta$ denoting the area of triangle.


So we can say that,
\[r'=\frac{\Delta_{CBD}}{s_{CBD}}=\frac{\Delta_{ABD}}{s_{ABD}}=\frac{\Delta_{CBD}+\Delta_{ABD}=\Delta_{ABC}}{s_{CBD}+s_{ABD}}\]So we have
\[\frac{1}{r'}=\frac{s_{ABC}+BD}{\Delta_{ABC}}=\frac{1}{r}+\frac{BD}{\Delta_{ABC}}\]
Claim: $BD^2=\Delta_{ABC}= AB\cdot BC/2$
Took help from ALM_04 for this part

We have,
\[\frac{\Delta_{CBD}}{\Delta_{ABD}}=\frac{s_{CBD}}{s_{ABD}}=\frac{CD}{AD}\]Therefore,
\[\frac{s_{CBD}}{CD}=\frac{s_{ABD}}{AD}\]\[\frac{BC+BD}{CD}=\frac{AB+BD}{AD}\]After some intense bashing we will get the result $\square$

Therefore, we will have
\[\frac{1}{r'}=\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{BD}\]$\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 5 times. Last edited by NTistrulove, Feb 27, 2022, 7:10 PM
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a