Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
Calculate the distance of chess king!!
egxa   5
N a few seconds ago by Tesla12
Source: All Russian 2025 9.4
A chess king was placed on a square of an \(8 \times 8\) board and made $64$ moves so that it visited all squares and returned to the starting square. At every moment, the distance from the center of the square the king was on to the center of the board was calculated. A move is called $\emph{pleasant}$ if this distance becomes smaller after the move. Find the maximum possible number of pleasant moves. (The chess king moves to a square adjacent either by side or by corner.)
5 replies
egxa
Apr 18, 2025
Tesla12
a few seconds ago
How many cases did you check?
avisioner   17
N 5 minutes ago by sansgankrsngupta
Source: 2023 ISL N2
Determine all ordered pairs $(a,p)$ of positive integers, with $p$ prime, such that $p^a+a^4$ is a perfect square.

Proposed by Tahjib Hossain Khan, Bangladesh
17 replies
avisioner
Jul 17, 2024
sansgankrsngupta
5 minutes ago
IMO Shortlist 2014 N5
hajimbrak   59
N 7 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Find all triples $(p, x, y)$ consisting of a prime number $p$ and two positive integers $x$ and $y$ such that $x^{p -1} + y$ and $x + y^ {p -1}$ are both powers of $p$.

Proposed by Belgium
59 replies
hajimbrak
Jul 11, 2015
Ilikeminecraft
7 minutes ago
Number theory
falantrng   38
N 8 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: RMM 2018 D2 P4
Let $a,b,c,d$ be positive integers such that $ad \neq bc$ and $gcd(a,b,c,d)=1$. Let $S$ be the set of values attained by $\gcd(an+b,cn+d)$ as $n$ runs through the positive integers. Show that $S$ is the set of all positive divisors of some positive integer.
38 replies
falantrng
Feb 25, 2018
Ilikeminecraft
8 minutes ago
USAMO 2001 Problem 5
MithsApprentice   23
N 10 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Let $S$ be a set of integers (not necessarily positive) such that

(a) there exist $a,b \in S$ with $\gcd(a,b)=\gcd(a-2,b-2)=1$;
(b) if $x$ and $y$ are elements of $S$ (possibly equal), then $x^2-y$ also belongs to $S$.

Prove that $S$ is the set of all integers.
23 replies
MithsApprentice
Sep 30, 2005
Ilikeminecraft
10 minutes ago
IMO 2016 Shortlist, N6
dangerousliri   67
N 11 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Denote by $\mathbb{N}$ the set of all positive integers. Find all functions $f:\mathbb{N}\rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ such that for all positive integers $m$ and $n$, the integer $f(m)+f(n)-mn$ is nonzero and divides $mf(m)+nf(n)$.

Proposed by Dorlir Ahmeti, Albania
67 replies
dangerousliri
Jul 19, 2017
Ilikeminecraft
11 minutes ago
IMO ShortList 1998, number theory problem 1
orl   54
N 11 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: IMO ShortList 1998, number theory problem 1
Determine all pairs $(x,y)$ of positive integers such that $x^{2}y+x+y$ is divisible by $xy^{2}+y+7$.
54 replies
orl
Oct 22, 2004
Ilikeminecraft
11 minutes ago
IMO Shortlist 2011, Number Theory 3
orl   47
N 11 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: IMO Shortlist 2011, Number Theory 3
Let $n \geq 1$ be an odd integer. Determine all functions $f$ from the set of integers to itself, such that for all integers $x$ and $y$ the difference $f(x)-f(y)$ divides $x^n-y^n.$

Proposed by Mihai Baluna, Romania
47 replies
orl
Jul 11, 2012
Ilikeminecraft
11 minutes ago
IMO ShortList 2002, number theory problem 6
orl   30
N 12 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: IMO ShortList 2002, number theory problem 6
Find all pairs of positive integers $m,n\geq3$ for which there exist infinitely many positive integers $a$ such that \[ \frac{a^m+a-1}{a^n+a^2-1}  \] is itself an integer.

Laurentiu Panaitopol, Romania
30 replies
orl
Sep 28, 2004
Ilikeminecraft
12 minutes ago
Euclid NT
Taco12   12
N 13 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: 2023 Fall TJ Proof TST, Problem 4
Find all pairs of positive integers $(a,b)$ such that \[ a^2b-1 \mid ab^3-1. \]
Calvin Wang
12 replies
Taco12
Oct 6, 2023
Ilikeminecraft
13 minutes ago
A=b
k2c901_1   87
N 14 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: Taiwan 1st TST 2006, 1st day, problem 3
Let $a$, $b$ be positive integers such that $b^n+n$ is a multiple of $a^n+n$ for all positive integers $n$. Prove that $a=b$.

Proposed by Mohsen Jamali, Iran
87 replies
k2c901_1
Mar 29, 2006
Ilikeminecraft
14 minutes ago
Floor of square root
v_Enhance   43
N 14 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: APMO 2013, Problem 2
Determine all positive integers $n$ for which $\dfrac{n^2+1}{[\sqrt{n}]^2+2}$ is an integer. Here $[r]$ denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to $r$.
43 replies
v_Enhance
May 3, 2013
Ilikeminecraft
14 minutes ago
Pair of multiples
Jalil_Huseynov   62
N 15 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: APMO 2022 P1
Find all pairs $(a,b)$ of positive integers such that $a^3$ is multiple of $b^2$ and $b-1$ is multiple of $a-1$.
62 replies
Jalil_Huseynov
May 17, 2022
Ilikeminecraft
15 minutes ago
USAMO 1983 Problem 2 - Roots of Quintic
Binomial-theorem   32
N 15 minutes ago by cubres
Source: USAMO 1983 Problem 2
Prove that the roots of\[x^5 + ax^4 + bx^3 + cx^2 + dx + e = 0\] cannot all be real if $2a^2 < 5b$.
32 replies
Binomial-theorem
Aug 16, 2011
cubres
15 minutes ago
Incenter lies on line
mofumofu   29
N Jan 23, 2025 by ErTeeEs06
Source: China TST 1 Day 1 Q3
Circle $\omega$ is tangent to sides $AB$,$AC$ of triangle $ABC$ at $D$,$E$ respectively, such that $D\neq B$, $E\neq C$ and $BD+CE<BC$. $F$,$G$ lies on $BC$ such that $BF=BD$, $CG=CE$. Let $DG$ and $EF$ meet at $K$. $L$ lies on minor arc $DE$ of $\omega$, such that the tangent of $L$ to $\omega$ is parallel to $BC$. Prove that the incenter of $\triangle ABC$ lies on $KL$.
29 replies
mofumofu
Jan 2, 2018
ErTeeEs06
Jan 23, 2025
Incenter lies on line
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: China TST 1 Day 1 Q3
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mofumofu
179 posts
#1 • 10 Y
Y by Mathuzb, tenplusten, anantmudgal09, R8450932, nguyendangkhoa17112003, GeoMetrix, amar_04, Adventure10, Mango247, Rounak_iitr
Circle $\omega$ is tangent to sides $AB$,$AC$ of triangle $ABC$ at $D$,$E$ respectively, such that $D\neq B$, $E\neq C$ and $BD+CE<BC$. $F$,$G$ lies on $BC$ such that $BF=BD$, $CG=CE$. Let $DG$ and $EF$ meet at $K$. $L$ lies on minor arc $DE$ of $\omega$, such that the tangent of $L$ to $\omega$ is parallel to $BC$. Prove that the incenter of $\triangle ABC$ lies on $KL$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Dukejukem
695 posts
#2 • 10 Y
Y by B.J.W.T, anantmudgal09, v_Enhance, igli.2001, nguyendangkhoa17112003, AlastorMoody, Arefe, IFA, AllanTian, Adventure10
Lemma: Let $ABCD$ be a cyclic quadrilateral with circumcenter $O.$ Denote $E \equiv AC \cap BD$ and $F \equiv AB \cap CD.$ Let $F'$ be the antipode of $F$ on $\odot(FBC).$ Then $O, E, F'$ are collinear.
[asy]
 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki, go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(12cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = 988.2182932954984, xmax = 1068.0180462919977, ymin = 1000.5589207237306, ymax = 1041.1134898172131;  /* image dimensions */
pen evefev = rgb(0.8980392156862745,0.9372549019607843,0.8980392156862745); pen qqwuqq = rgb(0.,0.39215686274509803,0.); 

filldraw((1028.992765986746,1028.5133767685782)--(1028.4445865189664,1027.9704143831332)--(1028.9875489044111,1027.4222349153533)--(1029.535728372191,1027.9651973007983)--cycle, evefev, linewidth(0.8) + qqwuqq); 
Label laxis; laxis.p = fontsize(10); 
xaxis(xmin, xmax, Ticks(laxis, Step = 2., Size = 2, NoZero),EndArrow(6), above = true); 
yaxis(ymin, ymax, Ticks(laxis, Step = 2., Size = 2, NoZero),EndArrow(6), above = true); /* draws axes; NoZero hides '0' label */ 
 /* draw figures */
draw(circle((1014.2460788614324,1012.8210610116407), 10.947073866713888), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw(circle((1013.8749203829444,1022.6412957550035), 16.54100464135123), linewidth(0.8) + linetype("2 2") + blue); 
draw((1003.8102533249038,1009.5147077917898)--(1019.3483333013737,1038.2504784872792), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((1019.3483333013737,1038.2504784872792)--(1024.901704683554,1010.3118650084917), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((1024.901704683554,1010.3118650084917)--(1011.2988442336773,1023.3639370088367), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((1011.2988442336773,1023.3639370088367)--(1046.2228815301826,1011.1177047633228), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((1046.2228815301826,1011.1177047633228)--(1019.3483333013737,1038.2504784872792), linewidth(0.8) + red); 
draw((1003.8102533249038,1009.5147077917898)--(1046.2228815301826,1011.1177047633228), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((1008.4015074645152,1007.0321130227279)--(1029.535728372191,1027.9651973007983), linewidth(0.8) + dotted); 
draw((1003.8102533249038,1009.5147077917898)--(1023.1321114660558,1019.2145616797301), linewidth(0.8)); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((1011.2988442336773,1023.3639370088367),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$A$", (1010.7688160201244,1023.6550206110503), N * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1003.8102533249038,1009.5147077917898),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$B$", (1002.803389444813,1008.3788600556578), W * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1024.901704683554,1010.3118650084917),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$C$", (1025.0629376826696,1009.0335526508889), E * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1023.1321114660558,1019.2145616797301),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$D$", (1023.2807189512073,1019.4358905528943), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1018.2024929102992,1016.7398214469407),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$E$", (1017.6430882700507,1017.3626973346624), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1019.3483333013737,1038.2504784872792),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F$", (1019.4980506232055,1038.4583476254425), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1014.2460788614324,1012.8210610116407),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$O$", (1014.3696252938954,1011.5795794101209), E * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1008.4015074645152,1007.0321130227279),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F'$", (1008.0045583958155,1005.5054869988102), E * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1046.2228815301826,1011.1177047633228),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$G$", (1046.7041651361415,1010.0519633545817), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1029.535728372191,1027.9651973007983),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$M$", (1029.6821576601335,1028.2014969668219), NE * labelscalefactor); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */
[/asy]
Proof: Denote $G \equiv AD \cap BC$ and let $M$ be the Miquel point of $ABCD.$ It is known that $O, E, M$ are collinear, and $OM \perp FG.$ On the other hand, since $M \in \odot(FBC)$ and $\overline{FF'}$ is a diameter of this circle, we have $F'M \perp FG.$ Therefore, $O, E, F'$ are collinear. $\blacksquare$
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Main Proof: Let $I$ be the incenter of $\triangle ABC.$ Note that $AI$ is the perpendicular bisector of $\overline{DE}$; also, $F$ is the reflection of $D$ in $IB$ and $G$ is the reflection of $E$ in $IC.$ It follows that $IF = ID = IE = IG.$ Therefore, $DEGF$ is cyclic with circumcenter $I.$
[asy]
 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki, go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(15cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = 983.8150410180909, xmax = 1049.4664952960939, ymin = 997.8046374990395, ymax = 1031.1689818563664;  /* image dimensions */
pen fsfsfs = rgb(0.9490196078431372,0.9490196078431372,0.9490196078431372); pen evfuff = rgb(0.8980392156862745,0.9568627450980393,1.); pen qqzzff = rgb(0.,0.6,1.); 

filldraw((1002.3155835435821,1028.2479023843553)--(997.5658551273822,1009.082914299408)--(1021.4141418604702,1009.1493440674667)--cycle, fsfsfs, linewidth(0.8) + gray); 
filldraw((1007.5274341255129,1000.0825257520867)--(1014.231628649713,1016.3318572782222)--(998.261773264589,1011.8909196502241)--cycle, evfuff, linewidth(0.8) + qqzzff); 
Label laxis; laxis.p = fontsize(10); 
xaxis(xmin, xmax, Ticks(laxis, Step = 2., Size = 2, NoZero),EndArrow(6), above = true); 
yaxis(ymin, ymax, Ticks(laxis, Step = 2., Size = 2, NoZero),EndArrow(6), above = true); /* draws axes; NoZero hides '0' label */ 
 /* draw figures */
draw((1002.3155835435821,1028.2479023843553)--(997.5658551273822,1009.082914299408), linewidth(0.8) + gray); 
draw((997.5658551273822,1009.082914299408)--(1021.4141418604702,1009.1493440674667), linewidth(0.8) + gray); 
draw((1021.4141418604702,1009.1493440674667)--(1002.3155835435821,1028.2479023843553), linewidth(0.8) + gray); 
draw(circle((1007.5009198560632,1009.6011484845728), 9.518659660361699), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw(circle((1005.8396671765145,1015.5751042733898), 8.42601284582261), linewidth(0.8) + linetype("2 2") + red); 
draw((1007.5274341255129,1000.0825257520867)--(1014.231628649713,1016.3318572782222), linewidth(0.8) + qqzzff); 
draw((1014.231628649713,1016.3318572782222)--(998.261773264589,1011.8909196502241), linewidth(0.8) + qqzzff); 
draw((998.261773264589,1011.8909196502241)--(1007.5274341255129,1000.0825257520867), linewidth(0.8) + qqzzff); 
draw(circle((1005.8396671765147,1015.5751042733892), 6.469118046555144), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((998.261773264589,1011.8909196502241)--(1011.2565736725893,1009.121050005663), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((1000.4588001954772,1009.0909726422188)--(1014.231628649713,1016.3318572782222), linewidth(0.8)); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((1002.3155835435821,1028.2479023843553),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$A$", (1001.888641010759,1028.71528119511), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((997.5658551273822,1009.082914299408),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$B$", (996.6820079002883,1008.0982110047978), N * labelscalefactor); dot((1021.4141418604702,1009.1493440674667),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$C$", (1021.7277085523798,1008.217903719981), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((998.261773264589,1011.8909196502241),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$D$", (997.3702410125919,1012.0181474270487), N * labelscalefactor); dot((1014.231628649713,1016.3318572782222),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$E$", (1014.3366833898151,1016.5066242464201), NE * labelscalefactor); label("$\omega$", (1002.3973350502878,1016.835779213174), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((1007.4744055866134,1019.1197712170533),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$L$", (1007.334659551596,1019.6784811987758), N * labelscalefactor); dot((1000.4588001954772,1009.0909726422188),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$F$", (1000.1231734618063,1008.1281341835936), S * labelscalefactor); dot((1011.2565736725893,1009.121050005663),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$G$", (1011.4341350466218,1008.3974427927559), E * labelscalefactor); dot((1003.6144104727823,1010.7499935216292),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$K$", (1003.2351840565703,1011.2700679571535), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((1007.5274341255129,1000.0825257520867),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$S$", (1007.4244290879835,999.1811037236467), E * labelscalefactor); dot((1005.8396671765139,1015.5751042733895),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$I$", (1005.9581933269889,1015.7585447765248), NE * labelscalefactor);
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */
[/asy]
Let $DF$ and $EG$ meet at $S.$ By the above observations, the sidelines of $\triangle SED$ are parallel to the sidelines of the intouch triangle of $\triangle ABC.$ Therefore, homothety carrying the incircle into $\omega$ carries the intouch triangle of $\triangle ABC$ into $\triangle SED.$ By homothety, we see that $S$ lies on major arc $\widehat{DE}$ of $\omega$, and the tangent to $\omega$ at $S$ is parallel to $BC.$ Therefore, $S$ and $L$ are antipodal points on $\omega.$ Applying the lemma to cyclic quadrilateral $DEGF$, we see that $I, K, L$ are collinear. $\square$
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by Dukejukem, Jan 3, 2018, 1:20 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
anantmudgal09
1980 posts
#3 • 4 Y
Y by Ankoganit, PHSH, Adventure10, MS_asdfgzxcvb
mofumofu wrote:
Circle $\omega$ is tangent to sides $AB$,$AC$ of triangle $ABC$ at $D$,$E$ respectively, such that $D\neq B$, $E\neq C$ and $BD+CE<BC$. $F$,$G$ lies on $BC$ such that $BF=BD$, $CG=CE$. Let $DG$ and $EF$ meet at $K$. $L$ lies on minor arc $DE$ of $\omega$, such that the tangent of $L$ to $\omega$ is parallel to $BC$. Prove that the incenter of $\triangle ABC$ lies on $KL$.

Suppose $DE$ is at variable distance $\lambda$ from $A$. Define $F, G$ as the reflections of $D, E$ in lines $BI, CI$ respectively. Let $S=DF \cap EG$ and $T=DE \cap BC$. Let $A_1, A_2$ be the touch-points of the incircle and $A$-excircle with $BC$. Observe that $\angle DFB=\angle DEG=90^{\circ}-\tfrac{1}{2}\angle B$ hence $DEFG$ is cyclic. Also $I$ is the center of the circle $\odot(DEFG)$.

Now by Brokard's Theorem, we know $IK \perp ST$. Note that $DLES$ is cyclic and is the image of the incircle under suitable homothety at $A$. Accordingly, we see $S \in AA_1, L \in AA_2$ and $T \in BC$ move with constant velocity. Hence we can find a spiral similarity with pivot $P$ such that $BC \mapsto AA_2$ and $T \mapsto S$. Let $Z$ be point at infinity with $ZP \perp ST$. Note that $L \mapsto Z$ is projective.

Thus, in order to prove $I, K, L$ collinear, it is equivalent to show $L \mapsto Z$ is a perspectivity about $I$. Hence it is enough to verify the result for three values of $\lambda \in \mathbb{R}$. If $DE$ is an intouch chord then we're done. Suppose $B=D$ (likewise let $C=E$ for the final case). Then $K=B$ and $\angle LDE=\tfrac{1}{2}\angle C$ hence $L$ lies on $BI$ and we're done. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MarkBcc168
1595 posts
#4 • 6 Y
Y by tenplusten, Cristiano-Ezio, k12byda5h, Adventure10, internationalnick123456, MS_asdfgzxcvb
Too easy for China TST P3. I will provide just a sketch since I am on mobile.

By easy angle chasing, $DEFG$ is cyclic and the intersection $DF\cap EG$ lies on $\omega$. By Reim, $LP$ is diameter of $\omega$.

Note that $I$ is the center of $\odot(DEFG)$. Now add Miquel point $M$ of $DEFG$ which lies on $IK$ and $\omega$. Note that $\angle LMP=90^{\circ}$ hence $I, K,L,M$ are colinear and we are done.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by MarkBcc168, Jan 2, 2018, 1:38 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6876 posts
#6 • 10 Y
Y by anantmudgal09, tenplusten, Cristiano-Ezio, RAMUGAUSS, v4913, thczarif, PHSH, Adventure10, Mango247, MS_asdfgzxcvb
It is also susceptible to straight barycentric coordinates.

Substitute $a=BC=v+w$, $b=CA=w+u$, $c=AB=u+v$. Let $X=(0:w:v)$, $Y=(w:0:u)$, $Z=(v:u:0)$ be the contact points of the incircle on $\overline{BC}$. Then we may set \begin{align*} D &= (v-t:u+t:0) \\ E &= (w-t:0:u+t) \\ F &= (0:w+t:v-t) \\ G &= (0:w-t:v+t) \end{align*}where $t=XF=XG=EY=DZ$.

We now solve for $K = (t:y:z)$, say. Since $K = \overline{DG} \cap \overline{EF}$ the standard determinants give \begin{align*} 	t(u+t)(v+t) &= (v-t)\left[ (v+t)y-(w-t)z \right] \\ 	t(u+t)(w+t) &= (w-t)\left[ -(v+t)y+(w+t)z \right]. \\ 	\implies 	t(u+t)\left[ (v+t)(w-t)+(w+t)(v+t) \right] &= 	\left[ -(w-t)^2(v-t)+(v+t)(w-t)(w+t) \right]z \\ 	z &= \frac{t(u+t)(v+t)(2w)} 	{(w-t)\left[ (v+t)(w+t)-(w-t)(v-t) \right]} \\ 	&= \frac{w(u+t)(v+t)}{(w-t)(v+w)}. \end{align*}Thus we recover \[ K = \left( \frac{t(v+t)}{u+t} : \frac{v(w+t)}{v-t} : 	\frac{w(v+t)}{w-t} \right). \]On the other hand, by homothety we have \begin{align*} 	\vec L &= \left( 1 + \frac tu \right) [2 \vec I - \vec X] - \frac tu \vec A \\ 	\left( 2u+2t \right) \vec I 	- u \vec L &= \left( u+t \right) \vec X + t \vec A \\ 	&= t \vec A + (u+t) \frac{w \vec B + v \vec C}{w+v} \\ \end{align*}Consequently the point $W = \frac{(2u+2t) \vec I - u \vec L}{u+2t} 	= \left( t(v+w) : w(u+t) : v(u+t) \right)$ lies on $\overline{IL}$ and is distinct from $I$ (since $u \neq 0$). Thus it is enough to show $W$, $K$, $I$ collinear: \begin{align*} 	\det \begin{bmatrix} 		\frac{t(v+w)}{u+t} & \frac{v(w+t)}{v-t} & \frac{w(v+t)}{w-t} \\ 		v+w & w+u & u+v \\ 		t(v+w) & w(u+t) & v(u+t) 	\end{bmatrix} 	&= 	\det \begin{bmatrix} 		0 & \frac{v(w+t)}{v-t}-w & \frac{w(v+t)}{w-t}-v \\ 		v+w & w+u & u+v \\ 		t(v+w) & w(u+t) & v(u+t) 	\end{bmatrix} \\ 	&= 	\det \begin{bmatrix} 		0 & \frac{v(w+t)}{v-t}-w & \frac{w(v+t)}{w-t}-v \\ 		v+w & w+u & u+v \\ 		0& u(w-t) & u(v-t) 	\end{bmatrix} \\ 	&= -(v+w) 	\det \begin{bmatrix} 		\frac{t(v+w)}{v-t} & \frac{t(v+w)}{w-t} \\ 		u(w-t) & u(v-t) 	\end{bmatrix} = 0. \end{align*}
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by v_Enhance, Jan 6, 2018, 6:16 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mosquitall
571 posts
#7 • 4 Y
Y by buratinogigle, enhanced, Adventure10, Mango247
My proof :

From simple angle chasing one can easily get that $\angle ((EDGF), (EDK)) = \angle ((EDGF), \omega)$. So in other words $(EDK)$ is inversion image of $\omega$ wrt $(EDGF)$, so $I$ is the inner homothety center of $\pi, (EDK)$. Now note that the tangent to $(EDK)$ from $K$ is parallel to $BC$, so from a homothety we get that $K, L, I$ are collinear. Done
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Mosquitall, Jan 7, 2018, 1:01 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
WizardMath
2487 posts
#8 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Solution.

Let $X=DF \cap EG$. Since $DEX$ and the intouch triangle of $ABC$ are homothetic, $X \in \omega$. Shooting lemma for $\omega$ and point $X$ implies $FGED$ is cyclic; its center is the intersection of the $\perp$ bisectors of $DF, EG$, i.e., $I$. Draw in the Miquel point of $FGED$, since it is the inverse of $K$ in $FGED$ and also the foot of $I$ the polar of $K$ wrt this circle, we get that the antipode of $X$ ($L$), $I$, $K$ are collinear. Done.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by WizardMath, Jan 9, 2018, 8:43 PM
Reason: Typo.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TelvCohl
2312 posts
#9 • 13 Y
Y by tenplusten, Pirkuliyev Rovsen, xdiegolazarox, enhanced, Cristiano-Ezio, nguyendangkhoa17112003, Sakura_jima.Mai, Avlon, k12byda5h, thczarif, PHSH, Adventure10, Mango247
Let $ Y, Z $ be the second intersection of $ \omega $ with $ EF, DG, $ respectively. Obviously, the incenter $ I $ of $ \triangle ABC $ is the circumcenter of $ DEFG, $ so simple angle chasing yields $ \measuredangle IFG = \measuredangle LYZ, $ $ \measuredangle IGF = \measuredangle LZY. $ On the other hand, by Reim's theorem we get $ FG \parallel YZ, $ so $ \triangle IFG $ and $ \triangle LYZ $ are homothetic $ \Longrightarrow I, L, K $ are collinear.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HHCN123
6 posts
#10 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
You can solve this question easily if using Simson theorm and what you need to do is to find the obvious circle of DEFG and prove two right angles.Maybe a little not natural but quite simple.China`s D1 questions are often easy.Then the whole solving is your task and I just offer an idea
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
math163
58 posts
#11 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
(redacted)
This post has been edited 5 times. Last edited by math163, Nov 10, 2018, 8:22 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
math163
58 posts
#13 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
(redacted)
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by math163, Nov 10, 2018, 8:21 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Cristiano-Ezio
9 posts
#14 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
It is easily to solve just by Pascal's theorem with circle DEFG. We could find that the incenter I of triangle ABC is the circumcenter of DEFG, and that make it natual to use Pascal's theorem.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
math_pi_rate
1218 posts
#15 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
My solution: Let $I$ be the incenter of $\triangle ABC$. Also let $DF \cap EG=T,\odot (FGT) \cap \omega=P,DE \cap BC=X$. Note that, as $AD=AE,BD=BF,CE=CG$, we have that $I$ lies on the perpendicular bisectors of $DE,DF,CG$, which in turn gives $ID=IE=IF=IG$. This means that $D,E,F,G$ lie on a circle centered at $I$. Also, $\angle BDT=\angle BFD=\angle DET \Rightarrow T$ lies on $\omega$, as $BD$ is tangent to $\omega$.

Now, $DE$ is antiparallel to $FG$ as well as to the tangent to $\omega$ at $T$, which means that the tangent to $\omega$ at $T$ is parallel to $BC$. This also gives that $L$ is the antipode of $T$ in $\omega$, and so $\measuredangle LPT=90^{\circ}$. But, $P$ is the Miquel Point of the degenerate cyclic quadrilateral $DEFG$, and so, by Brocard's Theorem, we get that $I$ is the orthocenter of $\triangle KTX$, and that $P$ lies on $TX$. Thus, $\measuredangle IPT=90^{\circ}=\measuredangle LPT \Rightarrow P,K,I,L$ are collinear. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by math_pi_rate, Oct 23, 2018, 1:51 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Jughead_0
6 posts
#16 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, Rounak_iitr
Different.

Let $I$ be the incenter of $\triangle ABC$; $F_1$, $G_1$ are reflections of $F$, $G$ in $I$.
Clearly, $I$ lies on perpendicular bisector of $DE$,$DF$,$EG$; so $DEFGF_1G_1$ is cyclic and center is $I$.

Claim: $D$, $L$, $F_1$ and $E$, $L$, $G_1$ are collinear.
Proof: I will prove that $\angle LDE= \angle F'DE$, which gives the first collinearity; second one follows similarly.
$$\angle LDE= \angle AEL=\angle (HE,BC)=\frac{1}2 \angle C$$$$\angle F'DE=\angle F'FE=90-\angle FF'E=90-\angle EGC=\frac{1}2 \angle C$$This completes the proof of claim. $\square$

Now, by Pascal's Theorem on $FF'DGG'E$, we get $K,I,L$ are collinear. $\square$
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by Jughead_0, May 25, 2019, 11:29 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TheUltimate123
1740 posts
#17 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, Rounak_iitr
[asy]
        size(5cm); defaultpen(fontsize(10pt));
        pen pri=deepblue;
        pen sec=deepcyan;
        pen tri=deepgreen;
        pen fil=invisible;
        pen sfil=invisible;
        pen tfil=invisible;

        pair A,B,C,I,D,EE,F,G,K,X,L,M;
        A=dir(110);
        B=dir(210);
        C=dir(330);
        I=incenter(A,B,C);
        D=(A+4B)/5;
        EE=reflect(A,I)*D;
        F=reflect(B,I)*D;
        G=reflect(C,I)*EE;
        K=extension(D,G,EE,F);
        X=extension(D,F,EE,G);
        L=extension(K,I,X,X+(0,1));
        M=foot(X,I,K);

        filldraw(circumcircle(D,F,G),tfil,tri);
        filldraw(circumcircle(D,EE,L),sfil,sec);
        filldraw(incircle(A,B,C),fil,pri);
        filldraw(D--X--EE--cycle,sfil,sec);
        draw(L--M--X,tri);
        draw(D--G,sec); draw(EE--F,sec);
        filldraw(A--B--C--cycle,fil,pri);

        dot("$A$",A,N);
        dot("$B$",B,SW);
        dot("$C$",C,SE);
        dot("$D$",D,W);
        dot("$I$",I,W);
        dot("$E$",EE,dir(30));
        dot("$F$",F,SW);
        dot("$G$",G,SE);
        dot("$K$",K,dir(110));
        dot("$X$",X,S);
        dot("$L$",L,N);
        dot("$M$",M,dir(240));
    [/asy]
Let $X=\overline{DF}\cap\overline{EG}$ and $M$ be the Miquel point of $DFGE$. Note that $\triangle XED$ and the contact triangle are homothetic at $A$, so $\overline{XL}$ is a diameter of $\omega$.

Since $ID=IE$, $ID=IF$, $IE=IG$ by construction, $I$ is the circumcenter of cyclic quadrilateral $DFGE$, thus by properties of the Miquel point, $I$, $K$, $M$ lie on a line perpendicular to $\overline{XM}$. But $\angle XML=90^\circ$, so $L$, $I$, $K$, $M$ are collinear, as desired
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by TheUltimate123, Dec 1, 2019, 2:27 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
william122
1576 posts
#18 • 2 Y
Y by Pappu123, Adventure10
We proceed with barycentric coordinates. Let $AD=AE=r$. Then, the coordinates of $F,G$ are $(0,a-c+r,c-r)$ and $(0,b-r,a-b+r)$ respectively, and the coordinates of $D,E$ are $(c-r,r,0)$, $(b-r,0,r)$ respectively. Computing a determinant, the equations of $EF$ and $DG$ are $$(a-b+r)rx-(a-b+r)(c-r)y+(b-r)(c-r)z=0$$$$(a-c+r)x+(b-r)(c-r)y-(a-c+r)(b-r)z=0$$Solving, we get that point $K$ has coordinates $$((a^2+2ar-ab-ac)(b-r)(c-r),r(b-r)(a+c-b)(a-c+r),r(c-r)(a+b-c)(a-b+r))$$Also, if we consider point $X=(0,s-b,s-c)$, the $A$-extouch point, note that $L$ is a homothety of $X$ wrt $A$ with factor $\frac{r}{s}$. So, it has coordinates $((s-r)a,r(s-b),r(s-c))$. Now, if we put the coordinates of $I,K,L$ into a determinant, we get a cubic in $r$, since it is easily verified that the quartic coefficient equals $0$. Thus, we just need to verify that the determinant is $0$ at $4$ points. We will choose $0,b,c,s-a$. At $0$, we have $$\begin{vmatrix}a&b&c\\(a^2-ab-ac)bc&0&0\\as&0&0\end{vmatrix}=0$$At $r=b$ we have $$\begin{vmatrix}a&b&c\\0&0&ab(c-b)(a+b-c)\\a(s-b)&b(s-b)&b(s-c)\end{vmatrix}=ab(c-b)(a+b-c)(ab(s-b)-ab(s-b))=0$$and we get a similar result for $r=c$. Finally, at $r=s-a$, we have $$\begin{vmatrix}a&b&c\\0&2(s-a)(s-c)^2(s-b)&2(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)^2\\a^2&(s-a)(s-b)&(s-a)(s-c)\end{vmatrix}\propto\begin{vmatrix}a&b&c\\0&(s-c)&(s-b)\\a^2&(s-a)(s-b)&(s-a)(s-c)\end{vmatrix}$$$$=a(s-c)^2(s-a)-a(s-b)^2(s-a)+b(s-b)a^2-c(s-c)a^2=0$$as desired.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by william122, Dec 29, 2019, 2:42 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
GeoMetrix
924 posts
#19 • 5 Y
Y by AlastorMoody, Pappu123, amar_04, Adventure10, Rounak_iitr
Maybe similiar to the others but since i like this ill post my solution anyways. :P
[asy]
 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(15cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = -17.64875782250771, xmax = 12.985228170215747, ymin = -10.078567823113621, ymax = 10.151798251301829;  /* image dimensions */
pen sexdts = rgb(0.1803921568627451,0.49019607843137253,0.19607843137254902); pen dtsfsf = rgb(0.8274509803921568,0.1843137254901961,0.1843137254901961); pen rvwvcq = rgb(0.08235294117647059,0.396078431372549,0.7529411764705882); pen wvvxds = rgb(0.396078431372549,0.3411764705882353,0.8235294117647058); pen wrwrwr = rgb(0.3803921568627451,0.3803921568627451,0.3803921568627451); 
 /* draw figures */
draw((-5.43637095285195,6.498396949998834)--(-8.57057841452274,-2.9320625037227908), linewidth(0.4) + sexdts); 
draw((-5.43637095285195,6.498396949998834)--(6.96,-2.55), linewidth(0.4) + sexdts); 
draw((6.96,-2.55)--(-8.57057841452274,-2.9320625037227908), linewidth(0.4) + sexdts); 
draw(circle((-2.756624790103522,-1.8758367417264656), 5.184106943530284), linewidth(0.4) + dtsfsf); 
draw(circle((-3.596878261132844,0.7499638003166852), 3.55859333554701), linewidth(0.4) + dtsfsf); 
draw((-3.596878261132844,0.7499638003166852)--(-8.57057841452274,-2.9320625037227908), linewidth(0.4) + rvwvcq); 
draw((-3.596878261132844,0.7499638003166852)--(6.96,-2.55), linewidth(0.4) + rvwvcq); 
draw((-7.676150691333448,-0.24083530163939865)--(-1.283252160384008,-2.7527894567191105), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-5.735469886770201,-2.8623169582879795)--(0.2997740533078106,2.311452466335568), linewidth(0.4) + rvwvcq); 
draw((-3.684395533087758,4.307480807290673)--(-3.5093609891779307,-2.8075532066573032), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-7.676150691333448,-0.24083530163939865)--(-5.735469886770201,-2.8623169582879795), linewidth(0.4) + wvvxds); 
draw((0.2997740533078106,2.311452466335568)--(-1.283252160384008,-2.7527894567191105), linewidth(0.4) + rvwvcq); 
draw((-5.43637095285195,6.498396949998834)--(-2.8841186772775,3.306702222014393), linewidth(0.4) + wrwrwr); 
draw(circle((-3.5968782949371954,0.7499637752913503), 4.197873997018878), linewidth(0.4) + linetype("4 4") + rvwvcq); 
draw((-7.676150691333448,-0.24083530163939865)--(0.2997740533078106,2.311452466335568), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-2.6291309029295515,-7.0583757054673235)--(-16.712165924866934,-3.132350942791587), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-2.8841186772775,3.306702222014393)--(-5.546903657206548,-6.2449680793904125), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-5.735469886770201,-2.8623169582879795)--(-2.6291309029295515,-7.0583757054673235), linewidth(0.4) + wvvxds); 
draw((-1.283252160384008,-2.7527894567191105)--(-2.6291309029295515,-7.0583757054673235), linewidth(0.4) + wvvxds); 
draw((-5.43637095285195,6.498396949998834)--(-2.6291309029295515,-7.0583757054673235), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-2.8841186772775,3.306702222014393)--(-2.6291309029295515,-7.0583757054673235), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-16.712165924866934,-3.132350942791587)--(-7.676150691333448,-0.24083530163939865), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-16.712165924866934,-3.132350942791587)--(-8.57057841452274,-2.9320625037227908), linewidth(0.4)); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((-5.43637095285195,6.498396949998834),dotstyle); 
label("$A$", (-5.3553790280251805,6.690555678098006), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-8.57057841452274,-2.9320625037227908),dotstyle); 
label("$B$", (-8.498346422083822,-2.738346504077927), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((6.96,-2.55),dotstyle); 
label("$C$", (7.037460759940218,-2.3603947288430267), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-3.596878261132844,0.7499638003166852),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$I$", (-3.5252967479404025,0.9019258573950597), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-7.676150691333448,-0.24083530163939865),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$D$", (-7.603197480738006,-0.07279187873705148), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((0.2997740533078106,2.311452466335568),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$E$", (0.3735741965880374,2.4734095544243817), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-3.5093609891779307,-2.8075532066573032),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$T$", (-3.4258357544575344,-2.6388855105950584), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-1.498834977839814,3.62429866411189),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$M$", (-1.4167236861035932,3.786294668398246), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-6.973851822223395,1.8722989086934119),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$J$", (-6.887078327661354,2.0357811830997603), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-5.735469886770201,-2.8623169582879795),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F$", (-5.653762008473786,-2.6985621066847796), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-1.283252160384008,-2.7527894567191105),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$G$", (-1.1979095004412827,-2.599101113201911), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-3.684395533087758,4.307480807290673),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$K$", (-3.604865542726697,4.462629424081752), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-2.8841186772775,3.306702222014393),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$L$", (-2.8091775948637503,3.468019489253067), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-4.24854799053207,-1.5876392286151881),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$K$", (-4.16184710623076,-1.425461390104063), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-2.6291309029295515,-7.0583757054673235),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$N$", (-2.5505790118082925,-6.8958160316618295), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-16.712165924866934,-3.132350942791587),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$O$", (-16.634255688982453,-2.9770528884368113), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-5.546903657206548,-6.2449680793904125),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$P$", (-5.474732220204623,-6.080235885102308), NE * labelscalefactor); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */
[/asy]
Proof: Firstly we give a defination of few points. Let $DF \cap GE=N$ and $DE \cap FG=O$. Let $J,M,T$ be the touchpoints of the incircle with $AB,AC,BC$.
Firstly notice that $\Delta DNE$ and $\Delta JTM$ are homothetic and so taking a homothety centred at $A$ s.t. $\odot(I) \mapsto \omega \implies N \in  \omega$. Also $\{A,T,N\}$ is a collinear triplet $\implies L$ is the $N$-Antipode w.r.t $\omega$. Now let $P$ be the miquel point of quaderilaeral $DEGF$. Notice that $ID=IF=IG=IE \implies I$ is the centre of $\odot(DFGE)$. Now its well known that $K,P$ are inverses w.r.t $\odot(DEFG)\implies \{I,K,P\}$ is a collinear triplet. By brocard we have that $\angle IPN=90^\circ$. Now notice that since $L$ is the $N$-antipode $\implies \angle LPN=90^\circ \implies \{L,I,K,P\}$ is a collinear triplet as desired.$\blacksquare$.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by GeoMetrix, Jan 5, 2020, 1:29 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
stroller
894 posts
#20 • 3 Y
Y by amar_04, Gaussian_cyber, Adventure10
Overcomplicated but different
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Plops
946 posts
#21 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Not an answer. Just a question.

Edit: Because the problem is a cyclic quad problem.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Plops, Feb 22, 2020, 12:57 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
khina
993 posts
#22
Y by
@above the fact that u can reduce ll the incenter stuff to focus just on the quad. because we kmow so much about miquel theory, it makes sense to focus on a structure we already know a lot about
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
amar_04
1915 posts
#23 • 5 Y
Y by GeoMetrix, Hexagrammum16, Bumblebee60, Mango247, VIATON
Too easy for China TST P3. Anyways really Nice Problem. :)
mofumofu wrote:
Circle $\omega$ is tangent to sides $AB$,$AC$ of triangle $ABC$ at $D$,$E$ respectively, such that $D\neq B$, $E\neq C$ and $BD+CE<BC$. $F$,$G$ lies on $BC$ such that $BF=BD$, $CG=CE$. Let $DG$ and $EF$ meet at $K$. $L$ lies on minor arc $DE$ of $\omega$, such that the tangent of $L$ to $\omega$ is parallel to $BC$. Prove that the incenter of $\triangle ABC$ lies on $KL$.

Note that after Simple Angle Chasing $DFGE$ we get that $DFGE$ is a cyclic quadrilateral. So, $\angle EGC=\angle GEC=\angle FDE$, now as $AC$ is tangent to $\omega$, hence it's obvious that $DF\cap EG=X\in\omega$. Now it's easy to notice that $L$ is the $K-\text{Antipode}$ WRT $\omega$. Let $LK\cap\omega=Y$, then it's well known that $Y$ is the Miquel Point of $DEGF$. So, the Circumcenter $(O)$ of $DEGF$ must lie on $LK$, and if $T$ is the Circumcenter of $\omega$ then $AT$ is the perpendicular bisector of $ED$. Hence, $ED\cap LY=O$. Hence, $OD=OF=OE=OG$. Hence, $BO,CO$ are the $B,C$ angle bisectors of $\triangle ABC$. So, $O\equiv I\in LK$. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by amar_04, Feb 26, 2020, 2:11 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AlastorMoody
2125 posts
#24 • 1 Y
Y by gamerrk1004
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Aryan-23
558 posts
#25 • 2 Y
Y by A-Thought-Of-God, VIATON
Easy for a China #3 ? Interesting problem though.

Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Idio-logy
206 posts
#26
Y by
Here is a moving points approach.

First, by easy angle chasing we get $DF, EG$ concur at a point $M$ on $\omega$, and points $D,E,F,G$ all lie on a circle centered at $I$. Let $DE,BC$ intersect at $T$, and let $TM$ intersect $\omega$ again at $N$. By Brokard's theorem, $KI$ passes through $N$, so it suffices to prove that $LI$ also passes through $N$. This can be deduced from the following claim:

Claim. Let $X = \mu D + (1-\mu)E$, $Y = \mu F + (1-\mu) G$ for some real number $\mu$. Denote the line through $X$ perpendicular to $DE$ by $\ell_1$, and denote the line through $Y$ perpendicular to $FG$ by $\ell_2$. Suppose $\ell_1 \cap \ell_2 = Z$. Then then as $\mu$ varies, $Z$ moves on the line $NL$ linearly. In particular, taking $\mu = 0.5$, we have $N,I,L$ collinear.

Proof. Let $\phi_1$ denote the linear map that sends $X$ to the point $Z_1 = \ell_1 \cap NL$, and let $\phi_2$ denote the linear map that sends $Y$ to the point $Z_2 = \ell_2 \cap NL$. It suffices to verify that $\phi_1, \phi_2$ coincide for two distinct values of $\mu$:
  • Take $\mu = 1$, then $\ell_1,\ell_2$ intersect on $NL$ because $T,D,F,N$ are concyclic.
  • Take $\mu = 0$, then $\ell_1,\ell_2$ intersect on $NL$ because $T,E,G,N$ are concyclic. $\square$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Lcz
390 posts
#27
Y by
Not the best solution, but...

Bary wrt $\Delta ABC$. Let $AD=AE=t$ so that
$\quad$-by lengths $D=(c-t:t:0)$, $E=(b-t:0:t)$, $F=(0:a-c+t:c-t)$, $G=(0:b-t:a-b+t)$.
$\quad$-by a homothety from $A$ with factor $\frac{t}{s}$ sending the $A$-excircle touch point $(0:s-b:s-c)$ to $L$ we get $L=(a(s-t):t(s-b):t(s-c))$.
Since $I=(a:b:c)$ it remains to compute $K$, the intersection of $$DG: t(a-b+t)x-(c-t)(a-b+t)y+(b-t)(c-t)z=0$$$$EF: t(a-c+t)x+(b-t)(c-t)y-(b-t)(a-c+t)z=0$$and solving we get $$K=(a(b-t)(c-t)(a+2t-b-c): t(a-c+t)(a-b+c)(b-t): t(a-b+t)(a+b-c)(c-t))$$Now to show the determinant $[IKL]=0$:
-divide the first column by $a$.
-multiply the first row by $t$, then divide the second and third columns by $t$
-add the first row to the second, then divide the second by $s$
-subtract $t$ times the second row from the first.
Now we have $$\begin{pmatrix}
  0 & b-t & c-t\\ 
  1 & 1 & 1\\
  (b-t)(c-t)(a+2t-b-c) & (a-c+t)(a-b+c)(b-t) & (a-b+t)(a+b-c)(c-t)
\end{pmatrix}$$
$$=(b-t)(c-t)(0)=0.$$where everything cancels (yay!)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
L567
1184 posts
#28
Y by
We have $\angle (DF, EG) = 180 - \angle DFB - \angle EGC = 90 - \frac{\angle BAC}{2} = \angle ADE$, which is the measure of arc $DE$, so we have $X = DF \cap EG \in \omega$. So, $\angle BFD = \angle BDX = \angle DEG$ so $DFEG$ is cyclic.

Note that since $I$ lies on the perpendicular bisectors of $EG, DF$, it must in fact be the circumcenter (since the quadrilateral is cyclic). Let $M$ be the miquel point of $DFEG$, which lies on $\omega$. It's well known that $I,K,M$ must be collinear, so it suffices to show that $MI$ goes through $L$. Since $IK \perp XM$, we must have that $MI \cap \omega$ is the antipode of $X$, so it suffices to show that the tangent at $X$ to $\omega$ is parallel to $BC$. But this is true since if $Z$ is a point on the tangent, then $\angle FXZ = \angle DXZ = \angle DEG = \angle DFB$, so we are done. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Om245
164 posts
#29 • 3 Y
Y by Deadline, GeoKing, Rounak_iitr
Let $I$ be incenter of $\triangle ABC$
Claim: $D,F,G,E$ lie on circle with center as $I$.

$$\angle FDE = 180 - \angle EDA - \angle BDF = 90 - \frac{\angle C}{2} = \angle CGE$$hence $D,F,E,G$ cyclic.Note $I$ lie on perpendicular bisector of $DE$ and by condition $BD=BF$ and $CE=CG$ we have $I$ also lie on perpendicular bisector of $GF$ also from fact that $IB$ and $IC$ are angle bisector we have $I$ as center of $(DEF)$

Let $T=DF \cap GE$
Claim : $T$ lie on $(DLE)$ with $\angle TDL = \angle LET = 90$

Let perpendicular from $L$ to $BC$ meet at $H$.If $O$ is center of $(DLE)$ then $O,E,B,H$ cyclic.
$$\angle LOD = \angle CBA \implies \angle ODL = 90 - \frac{\angle B}{2} \implies \angle EDL = \frac{\angle C}{2}$$hence $\angle FDL = \angle FDE + \angle EDL = 90$

Claim : $L,I,K$ are collinear.
Let $M=(TGF)\cap (DTE)$. Then $M$ is miquel point point of $\Box DEGF$. hence $\overline{I-K-M}$ (well know property)
as $LT$ is diameter $\angle TML = 90$, but it's well know that $\angle TMI = 90$ hence $\overline{L-I-M}$

Hence $L,I,K$ are collinear $\blacksquare$


[asy]

 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(19.07651842087848cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = -4.322575073781325, xmax = 22.753943347097152, ymin = -11.155828560285837, ymax = 3.1133695277123317;  /* image dimensions */
pen ffxfqq = rgb(1.,0.4980392156862745,0.); 

draw((6.993497304868754,1.7930527604426043)--(4.74121400092014,-6.783937749194878)--(15.721214000920138,-6.883937749194877)--cycle, linewidth(0.4) + ffxfqq); 
 /* draw figures */
draw((6.993497304868754,1.7930527604426043)--(4.74121400092014,-6.783937749194878), linewidth(0.4) + ffxfqq); 
draw((4.74121400092014,-6.783937749194878)--(15.721214000920138,-6.883937749194877), linewidth(0.4) + ffxfqq); 
draw((15.721214000920138,-6.883937749194877)--(6.993497304868754,1.7930527604426043), linewidth(0.4) + ffxfqq); 
draw(circle((10.260220799534883,-3.6489912612960405), 6.347229752037104), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((xmin, -3.673826499279709*xmin + 27.485948481710658)--(xmax, -3.673826499279709*xmax + 27.485948481710658), linewidth(0.4)); /* line */
draw(circle((8.962592300056919,-5.441060612478726), 3.7418809170599285), linewidth(0.4) + red); 
draw((5.343414536894738,-4.490679049058201)--(9.911189132387893,-6.831023132905878), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((7.11212409920384,-6.805530737339539)--(11.600778937775456,-2.7874509836861616), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((xmin, -0.009107468123861607*xmin-1.6173979879750853)--(xmax, -0.009107468123861607*xmax-1.6173979879750853), linewidth(0.4)); /* line */
draw((xmin, 4.764129681840161*xmin-44.56063720954149)--(xmax, 4.764129681840161*xmax-44.56063720954149), linewidth(0.4) + green); /* line */
draw(circle((8.538392964454843,-3.8826258523669748), 3.2523246828354737), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((xmin, 0.27219576106712146*xmin-5.945133835625384)--(xmax, 0.27219576106712146*xmax-5.945133835625384), linewidth(0.4)); /* line */
draw((5.343414536894738,-4.490679049058201)--(8.996669947959758,-1.6993348727470368), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((8.996669947959758,-1.6993348727470368)--(11.600778937775456,-2.7874509836861616), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((7.11212409920384,-6.805530737339539)--(8.996669947959758,-1.6993348727470368), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((8.996669947959758,-1.6993348727470368)--(9.911189132387893,-6.831023132905878), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((5.343414536894738,-4.490679049058201)--(8.928514652154083,-9.182786352210424), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((11.600778937775456,-2.7874509836861616)--(8.928514652154083,-9.182786352210424), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((8.996669947959758,-1.6993348727470368)--(8.928514652154083,-9.182786352210424), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw(circle((8.504315316552006,-7.624351592098668), 1.6151359007370965), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((4.74121400092014,-6.783937749194878)--(-2.8283481155758152,-6.714998203507301), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-2.8283481155758152,-6.714998203507301)--(8.928514652154083,-9.182786352210424), linewidth(0.4)); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((6.993497304868754,1.7930527604426043),dotstyle); 
label("$A$", (7.05464745517935,1.9534013089775137), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((4.74121400092014,-6.783937749194878),dotstyle); 
label("$B$", (4.115001969344539,-6.643075490139423), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((15.721214000920138,-6.883937749194877),dotstyle); 
label("$C$", (15.603454327498964,-6.357055929355495), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.962592300056919,-5.441060612478726),dotstyle); 
label("$O$", (9.215684136657915,-5.4354373446072834), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((5.343414536894738,-4.490679049058201),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$D$", (4.9253907248990005,-4.243689174674252), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((11.600778937775456,-2.7874509836861616),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$E$", (11.901090012907012,-2.527571809970686), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((9.911189132387893,-6.831023132905878),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$G$", (9.962512989815947,-6.023366441774246), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((7.11212409920384,-6.805530737339539),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F$", (6.879857723589172,-6.372945904954602), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.996669947959758,-1.6993348727470368),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$L$", (9.311023990252556,-1.4152735180331897), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.538392964454843,-3.882625852366973),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$I$", (8.738984868684701,-3.957669613890324), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.112914677045005,-5.9096595903947025),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$K$", (8.500635234698095,-5.880356661382282), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.928514652154083,-9.182786352210424),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$T$", (9.199794161058806,-9.598610951573342), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((10.202416004181245,-9.995957791125791),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$A'$", (10.264422526198981,-9.868740536758162), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((7.489289618033217,-8.880690244372106),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$M$", (7.213547211170421,-8.45453270843763), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-2.8283481155758152,-6.714998203507301),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$R$", (-2.76535746506883,-6.595405563342101), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.950012986401948,-6.822269251794895),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$H$", (8.389405405504345,-6.54773563654478), NE * labelscalefactor); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */
[/asy]
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
L13832
263 posts
#30
Y by
Finally done after :wallbash: and :censored:
https://wiki-images.artofproblemsolving.com//7/7b/POTD_-1000.png
Let $DF\cap EG=J$ and $DE\cap FG=S$, we have $\odot(DEGF)$ with center $I$. Note that the $J$ is $L$-antipode this is because $\triangle DEJ$ and contact triangle are homothetic with center $A$, so $\overline{A-J-N}$.
Now let the miquel point of $\odot(DEGF)$ be $M$ which is also $\odot(DJE)\cap \odot(FJG)$, then $\overline{I-K-M}$ and finally by Brokard's theorem we have $\angle IMJ=90^{\circ}$ because $J$ is the $L$-antipode we have $\angle LMJ=90^{\circ}$, so $\overline{L-I-K-M}$ and we are done!
Remark
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by L13832, Sep 26, 2024, 12:46 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pinetree1
1207 posts
#31 • 2 Y
Y by anantmudgal09, abeot
Here is an alternative solution using my favorite technique, the ``radical axis trick'': if you don't know how to prove three points are collinear, try to throw them on a radical axis. While there are certainly more natural solutions (see all above posts), this problem is still a nice showcase of the method.

Claim: Points $D$, $E$, $F$, and $G$ lie on a circle with center $I$.

Proof. From the given length conditions, we immediately deduce that $ID = IF$ and $IE = IG$. But we also have $ID = IE$ from the definition of $\omega$. $\blacksquare$

[asy]
	size(300);
    defaultpen(fontsize(10pt));
    pair A, B, C, D, E, F, G, I, O, K, L, X, Y, MA;
    real r = 0.47;
    A = dir(120);
    B = dir(210);
    C = dir(330);
    I = incenter(A, B, C);
    O = (1+r)*I - r*A;
    D = foot(O, A, B);
    E = foot(O, A, C);
    F = 2*foot(D, B, I) - D;
    G = 2*foot(E, C, I) - E;
    K = extension(D, G, E, F);
    L = O + abs(O-D)*dir(90);
    MA = dir(270);
    X = 2*foot(MA, D, L) - D;
    Y = 2*foot(MA, E, L) - E;
    draw(A--B--C--cycle, orange);
    draw(circumcircle(A, B, C), red);
    draw(CP(O, D), heavyred);
    draw(D--G^^E--F, lightblue);
    draw(circumcircle(B, D, I), lightblue+dashed);
    draw(circumcircle(C, E, I), lightblue+dashed);
    draw(D--L--Y, heavycyan);
    draw(circumcircle(D, F, G), dotted+heavygreen);
    draw(K--L, dotted+magenta);
    dot("$A$", A, dir(A));
    dot("$B$", B, dir(180));
    dot("$C$", C, dir(0));
    dot("$D$", D, dir(130));
    dot("$E$", E, dir(50));
    dot("$I$", I, dir(120));
    dot("$F$", F, dir(300));
    dot("$G$", G, dir(315));
    dot("$K$", K, dir(270));
    dot("$L$", L, dir(90));
    dot("$X$", X, dir(90));
    dot("$Y$", Y, dir(60));
    dot("$M_A$", MA, dir(270));
[/asy]

Remark: If we are looking to apply the radical axis trick, we now know that $K$ automatically lies on the radical axis of any two circles $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$ with $D, G\in \omega_1$ and $E, F\in \omega_2$. So there are two natural choices: $\omega_1 = (DGI)$ and $\omega_2 = (EFI)$, or $\omega_1 = (DGL)$ and $\omega_2 = (EFL)$. Trying both briefly should convince you that the first option is much easier.

At this point, we make the following observations:
  • Since $DI = IG$ and $\overline{BI}$ bisects $\angle DBG$, $B\in (DGI)$. Similarly, $C\in (EFI)$. (This is another of my favorite tricks.)
  • Straightforward angle chasing yields $\overline{DL}\parallel \overline{BI}$ and $\overline{EL}\parallel \overline{CI}$. (For example, the homothety at $A$ sending $\omega$ to the $A$-excircle sends $L$, $D$, $E$ to the excircle tangency points.)
To finish, let $X = \overline{DL}\cap (DGI)\neq D$ and $Y = \overline{EK}\cap (EFI)\neq E$. It suffices to show that $DXEY$ is cyclic; then $K$, $I$, $L$ will all lie on the radical axis of $(DGI)$ and $(EFI)$.

We will show that $D$, $X$, $E$, $Y$ all lie on a circle with center $M_A$, the midpoint of arc $BC$. First note that $M_AD = M_AE$, by the definition of $\omega$. Furthermore, from the parallel lines, we see that $BDXI$ and $CYEI$ are isosceles trapezoids. Hence $DX$ and $BI$ share a perpendicular bisector, and so if $M_A$ is the midpoint of arc $BC$, we must have $M_AD = M_AX$. Similarly, we get $M_AE = M_AY$, which completes the proof.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ErTeeEs06
52 posts
#32
Y by
Let $I$ denote the incenter of $\triangle ABC$.

$$\angle EDF=180^\circ-\angle ADE-\angle FDB=\frac{\alpha}{2}+\frac{\beta}{2}=90^\circ-\frac{\gamma}{2}=180^\circ-\angle EGF$$. This implies $DEGF$ is cyclic. Obviously $I$ is on the perpendicular bisector of $DE$ and you can play around with lengths to easily show that the $A$-intouch point is the midpoint of $FG$ which implies $I$ is on perpendicular bisector of $FG$. Combining these claims imply $I$ is the center of $(DEGF)$. From there we also get that $I$ is on $(BDG)$ and on $(CEF)$. Let $DG$ intersect $\omega$ again in $S$. Because the tangent in $L$ is parallel to $BC$ we know that $\angle ADL=\frac{\beta}{2}$. So $\angle DSL=\frac{\beta}{2}$. Also $\angle DGI=\angle DBI=\frac{\beta}{2}$, so $\angle DSL=\angle DGI$ which implies $SL\parallel GI$. Now with Reim we conclude that $K, I, L$ are collinear and we are done.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a