Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
Constant Angle Sum
i3435   6
N a few seconds ago by bin_sherlo
Source: AMASCIWLOFRIAA1PD (mock oly geo contest) P3
Let $ABC$ be a triangle with circumcircle $\Omega$, $A$-angle bisector $l_A$, and $A$-median $m_A$. Suppose that $l_A$ meets $\overline{BC}$ at $D$ and meets $\Omega$ again at $M$. A line $l$ parallel to $\overline{BC}$ meets $l_A$, $m_A$ at $G$, $N$ respectively, so that $G$ is between $A$ and $D$. The circle with diameter $\overline{AG}$ meets $\Omega$ again at $J$.

As $l$ varies, show that $\angle AMN + \angle DJG$ is constant.

MP8148
6 replies
i3435
May 11, 2021
bin_sherlo
a few seconds ago
NEPAL TST 2025 DAY 2
Tony_stark0094   8
N 16 minutes ago by cursed_tangent1434
Consider an acute triangle $\Delta ABC$. Let $D$ and $E$ be the feet of the altitudes from $A$ to $BC$ and from $B$ to $AC$ respectively.

Define $D_1$ and $D_2$ as the reflections of $D$ across lines $AB$ and $AC$, respectively. Let $\Gamma$ be the circumcircle of $\Delta AD_1D_2$. Denote by $P$ the second intersection of line $D_1B$ with $\Gamma$, and by $Q$ the intersection of ray $EB$ with $\Gamma$.

If $O$ is the circumcenter of $\Delta ABC$, prove that $O$, $D$, and $Q$ are collinear if and only if quadrilateral $BCQP$ can be inscribed within a circle.

$\textbf{Proposed by Kritesh Dhakal, Nepal.}$
8 replies
Tony_stark0094
Apr 12, 2025
cursed_tangent1434
16 minutes ago
Interesting inequalities
sqing   4
N 22 minutes ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $ a,b,c\geq  0 $ and $  ab+bc+ca+abc=4$ . Prove that
$$k(a+b+c) -ab-bc\geq 4\sqrt{k(k+1)}-(k+4)$$Where $ k\geq \frac{16}{9}. $
$$ \frac{16}{9}(a+b+c) -ab-bc\geq  \frac{28}{9}$$
4 replies
+1 w
sqing
3 hours ago
sqing
22 minutes ago
NEPAL TST DAY 2 PROBLEM 2
Tony_stark0094   6
N 34 minutes ago by cursed_tangent1434
Kritesh manages traffic on a $45 \times 45$ grid consisting of 2025 unit squares. Within each unit square is a car, facing either up, down, left, or right. If the square in front of a car in the direction it is facing is empty, it can choose to move forward. Each car wishes to exit the $45 \times 45$ grid.

Kritesh realizes that it may not always be possible for all the cars to leave the grid. Therefore, before the process begins, he will remove $k$ cars from the $45 \times 45$ grid in such a way that it becomes possible for all the remaining cars to eventually exit the grid.

What is the minimum value of $k$ that guarantees that Kritesh's job is possible?

$\textbf{Proposed by Shining Sun. USA}$
6 replies
Tony_stark0094
Apr 12, 2025
cursed_tangent1434
34 minutes ago
No more topics!
IMO 2018 Problem 1
juckter   168
N Apr 4, 2025 by Trasher_Cheeser12321
Let $\Gamma$ be the circumcircle of acute triangle $ABC$. Points $D$ and $E$ are on segments $AB$ and $AC$ respectively such that $AD = AE$. The perpendicular bisectors of $BD$ and $CE$ intersect minor arcs $AB$ and $AC$ of $\Gamma$ at points $F$ and $G$ respectively. Prove that lines $DE$ and $FG$ are either parallel or they are the same line.

Proposed by Silouanos Brazitikos, Evangelos Psychas and Michael Sarantis, Greece
168 replies
juckter
Jul 9, 2018
Trasher_Cheeser12321
Apr 4, 2025
IMO 2018 Problem 1
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Assassino9931
1243 posts
#170 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
If you prefer to not add new points in the diagram, then trig bash for the win!

By the Sine Law in triangles $AFD$, $AEG$ and the circumcircle of $ABC$ with radius $R$ we have
\[ \frac{AD}{\sin \angle AFD} = \frac{AF}{\sin \angle ADF} = \frac{AF}{\sin \angle BDF} = \frac{AF}{\sin \angle ABF} = 2R \]\[ \frac{AE}{\sin \angle AGE} = \frac{AG}{\sin \angle AFG} = \frac{AG}{\sin \angle GFC} = \frac{AG}{\sin \angle ACG} = 2R\]and since $AD = AE$ from the problem condition, we obtain $\sin \angle AFD = \sin \angle AGE$. As $\angle AFD + \angle AGE < \angle AFG + \angle AGF < 180^{\circ}$, it follows that $\angle AFD = \angle AGE$. Denote their common value by $z$.

Denote $P = AB \cap FG$ and $Q = AC \cap FG$. Since $GC = GF$ from the perpendicular bisector, we compute
\[ \angle APQ = \angle AFG + \angle BAF = \angle ACG + \angle BAF  = \angle AFG + \angle BAF \]\[ = \angle GAF + \angle AGF + \angle BAF = x + y + z. \]Analogously $\angle AQP = x + y + z$. Therefore $AP = AQ$, so $\angle ADE = 90^{\circ} - \frac{1}{2}\angle ABC = \angle APQ$ and the result follows.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
peppapig_
280 posts
#171 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
We use a phantom point type argument - we start with assuming that $FG$ is such that if $FG\cap AB=X$ and $FG\cap AC=Y$, then $AX=AY$. This ensures that no matter what $D$, $E$ we choose such that $AD=DE$, $FG$ is parallel to $DE$. Now, define $D'$ to be the point on segment $AB$ (meaning on line $AB$ between $A$ and $B$) such that $BF=FD'$ and define $E'$ similarly to be on segment $AC$ with $CG=GE'$. I now claim that $AD'=AE' \rightarrow D'E'\parallel FG$.

WLOG, assume that the radius of the circumcircle of $\triangle ABC$ is $\frac{1}{2}$. This means that for any chord of the circle that bisects a minor arc with angle $\theta$, the length of the chord is $\sin \theta$. Now, let $\angle BAC=a$, $\angle ABC=b$, $\angle ACB=c$, and $\angle GCA=x$. Through angle chasing, we get that
\[\angle FBA=\angle FBC-b=(180-\angle FGC)-b=(\angle GYC+\angle GCA)-b=(90-\frac{a}{2})+x-b=\frac{-b+c}{2}+x,\]which then gives that
\[\angle FAB= \frac{b+c}{2}-x,\]and
\[\angle CAG=b-x.\]
Now, for the trig. By our assumption about the circumcircle's radius, we have that
\[CG=\sin \angle GAC=\sin (b-x),\]and since $GC=CE'$, using the isosceles triangle, we get that
\[CE'=2\sin (b-x)\cos x,\]which is equal to $\sin b+\sin (b-2x)$ by Product-to-Sum formulas. This means that
\[AE'=AC-(\sin b+\sin (b-2x))=\sin b-(\sin b+\sin (b-2x))=-\sin(b-2x).\]Similarly, we get that
\[BD'=2\sin \left(\frac{b+c}{2}-x\right)\cos x,\]which is equal to $\sin c+\sin (b-2x)$ by Product-to-Sum formulas. This means that
\[AD'=AB-(\sin c+\sin (b-2x))=\sin c-(\sin c+\sin (b-2x))=-\sin(b-2x),\]which is indeed equal to $AE'$, as desired.

Varying the line $FG$ along the circle, we see that all possible lines $DE$ are covered using this "backwards" approach (i.e. for any two points $D$, $E$, chosen on $AB$ and $AC$ such that $AD=AE$, we can find line $FG$ such that $D'=D$ and $E=E'$). Therefore, $DE\parallel FG$ or $DE$ and $FG$ coincide, as desired.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by peppapig_, Mar 9, 2024, 10:34 PM
Reason: Bad latex
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
idkk
118 posts
#172 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
Supercali wrote:
PavelMath wrote:
Here is my solution.
Let points $D$ and $E$ move linearly along the lines $AB$ and $AC$ respectively. Then the lines $(DE)$ and $(FG)$ also move linearlly. Hence its enough to prove that $(DE)||(FG)$ for three positions of the points $D$ and $E$. We can take $D=E=A$, $D=B$ and $E=C$. For all these cases our statment $(DE)||(FG)$ is obviously true. Hence it is true for arbitrary point $D$.

I have a similar proof using Perspectivity. This argument can more rigorous.
how u do that? A similar case where moving points was a India TST P1
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by idkk, Mar 12, 2024, 11:03 AM
Reason: .
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ABCDE
1963 posts
#173 • 10 Y
Y by InCtrl, pieater314159, trumpeter, OronSH, anantmudgal09, math_comb01, ihatemath123, kingu, qwerty123456asdfgzxcvb, cubres
We proceed using differential moving points, with thanks to Linus Tang for bringing this problem to my attention. The idea is to compute the derivatives of $F$ and $G$ as a function of $D$ and $E$ and show that their angular velocities are equal so the line through them remains parallel to a fixed line, reducing the problem to checking one special case. Formalizing this idea takes a bit more work, as these derivatives themselves depend on the positions of $F$ and $G$.

Let $M$ and $N$ be the midpoints of $BD$ and $CE$, $\ell_F$ and $\ell_G$ be the tangents to $(ABC)$ at $F$ and $G$, and $\theta_F$ and $\theta_G$ be the angles that $\ell_F$ and $\ell_G$ make with $AB$ and $AC$. We will parameterize $AB$ and $AC$ with $\mathbb R$ and $(ABC)$ with $\mathbb R/2\pi\mathbb Z$, though we will be loose with sign conventions to simplify the presentation. Throughout the solution, $\frac{dY}{dX}$ will denote the derivative of the point $Y$ as a function of the point $X$ which varies along a curve parameterized as above.

We have that $\frac{dF}{dM}$ has magnitude $\frac1{\cos\theta_F}$ along $\ell_F$ by linearizing $(ABC)$ at $F$ and $\frac{d\theta_F}{dF}=1$ as the direction of $\ell_F$ is perpendicular to the argument of $F$ on $(ABC)$. Clearly, $\frac{dM}{dD}=\frac12$, so $\frac{d\theta_F}{dD}=\frac1{2\cos\theta_F}$ by the chain rule. Repeating the same argument with $N$, $\ell_G$, and $\theta_G$, we find that $\frac{d\theta_G}{dE}=\frac1{2\cos\theta_G}$. Now, defining $E$ as the point on $AC$ such that $AD=AE$, we have that $\frac{dE}{dD}=1$ so $\frac{d\theta_G}{dD}=\frac1{2\cos\theta_G}$ as well.

The key claim now is that $\theta_F=\theta_G$ as functions of $D$. Indeed, $\theta_F(B)=\theta_G(B)$ as when $D=B$ we have that $D,E,G$ are collinear and both angles can be chased to be equal to $\angle C$. Now, both $\theta_F$ and $\theta_G$ satisfy the differential equation $\frac{d\theta}{dD}=\frac1{2\cos\theta}$ with the initial condition $\theta(B)=\angle C$. By standard ODE theory, modulo some technical details such as generalizing the problem to allow for $D$ and $E$ to lie slightly outside $AB$ and $AC$ and checking that $\theta\mapsto\frac1{2\cos\theta}$ is "nice" enough, the solution to this differential equation is unique, so indeed we have that $\theta_F=\theta_G$. (Technically, we might only be able to conclude local uniqueness, but this would amusingly allow us to finish easily with vanilla moving points.)

Finally, $\theta_F=\theta_G$ implies that the angle bisectors of $\angle(\ell_F,\ell_G)$ and $\angle BAC$ are parallel, so $FG$ is perpendicular to the angle bisector of $\angle BAC$ along with $DE$, as desired.

I would be very interested in any other problems that can be done using this kind of approach. For instance, it should be possible to show the generalized Poncelet's porism with these techniques. If anyone knows of other examples, please let me know.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mofumofu
179 posts
#174 • 3 Y
Y by G81928128, busy-beaver, cubres
I was at the contest! I thought that the constructions of new points in this problem is not entirely trivial.

I wrote a short guide on Reim and my solving process for this problem (hopefully with some motivations and takeaways) on the blog here.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
P2nisic
406 posts
#175 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
juckter wrote:
Let $\Gamma$ be the circumcircle of acute triangle $ABC$. Points $D$ and $E$ are on segments $AB$ and $AC$ respectively such that $AD = AE$. The perpendicular bisectors of $BD$ and $CE$ intersect minor arcs $AB$ and $AC$ of $\Gamma$ at points $F$ and $G$ respectively. Prove that lines $DE$ and $FG$ are either parallel or they are the same line.

Proposed by Silouanos Brazitikos, Evangelos Psychas and Michael Sarantis, Greece

Let $X,Y$ are points on $(ABC)$ such that $AX=AY=AD$
Let $F$ be the center of $(DXB)$ then we get that:
$\angle XFB=360-2\angle XDB=360-2(180-\angle ADA)=2\angle XDA=180-\angle XAB$ so $F$ belongs to $(ABC)$.
$\angle XFY=2\angle XBA=2\angle XBD=\angle XFD$ so $F,D,Y$ are collinear.
$\angle XGF=\angle XAF=\frac{1}{2}\angle XAD=\angle XED$ so $DE//FG$
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MagicalToaster53
159 posts
#176 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
Let $GE$ and $FD$ meet $\Gamma$ at $X$ and $Y$ respectively. Then it suffices to show by Reim's theorem that $XYED$ is cyclic. We are motivated that $A$ is the circumcenter of the circumcircle of $XYED$ as $\triangle ADE$ is isosceles. We make the following claim:

Claim: $\triangle AXE$ and $\triangle ADY$ are both isosceles.
Proof: We prove for $\triangle AXE$ as the case for $\triangle ADY$ follows by symmetry. We find that \[\angle GXA = \angle GCE = \angle GEC = \angle AEX. \phantom{c} \square\]
Therefore we have that $AX = AE = AD = AY$, so that $XYED$ is cyclic, as desired. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Phat_23000245
18 posts
#177 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
Cho B', C' là các điểm trên đường tròn ngoại tiếp ABC sao cho BF = B'F và CG = C'G. Vì $\góc B'AF = \góc BAF$, $AB'FD$ là một hình diều. Tương tự, $AC'GE$là một hình diều, và do đó $AB' = AD = AE = AC'$. Khi đó $F, A, G$là các trung điểm của các cung $BB', B'C', C'C$tương ứng. Lưu ý rằng tổng của ba cung này là $360^\circ - 2\góc A$, do đó một nửa tổng đó là $180^\circ - \góc A$. Nếu $L$là trung điểm của cung nhỏ $BC$, phép đuổi góc đơn giản để tìm góc giữa $AL$và $FG$là $90^\circ$. Khi đó $DE$rõ ràng là vuông góc với $AL$ :fool:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
kinnikuma
9 posts
#179 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
Construct $H$ so that $ADFH$ is a parallelogram, and construct $I$ in the same manner. Notice, by some angle chasing, that $H$ and $I$ both lie on $\Omega(ABC)$. Let $J$ be the intersection of $(HF)$ and $(IG)$. By definition of the parallelogram, we have $(JF) \parallel (AD)$ and $(JG) \parallel (AE)$. Furthermore, notice that $HF = AD = AE = IG$, so that $FHIG$ becomes a trapezoid. Therefore $\angle JFG = \angle JGF$. Consequently, with the parallelisms stated before, $JFG$ and $ADE$ are similar. Hence with the parallelism stated they are necessarily homothetic : the parallelism that was unknown to us is especially $(FG) \parallel (DE)$, as wanted $\huge \blacksquare$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Jndd
1417 posts
#180 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
Construct points $X$ and $Y$ on $\Gamma$ on minor arcs $AB$ and $AC$ respectively, such that $FXAB$ and $GYAC$ are isosceles trapezoids. Then, since $FD$ is the reflection of $FB$ over the line through $F$ perpendicular of $AB$, and similarly for $GE$, we have that $XADF$ and $YAEG$ are both parallelograms. Thus, $XF=AD=AE=YG$, meaning $XYGF$ is an isosceles trapezoid. Additionally, letting $M$ and $N$ being midpoints of minor arcs $AB$ and $AC$ respectively, notice that $M$ and $N$ are also the midpoints of minor arcs $XF$ and $YG$. Thus, minor arcs $FM$, $MX$, $GN$, and $NX$ are all equal, which now gives that $MNGF$ is an isosceles trapezoid. Thus, $MN\parallel FG$, so we want to show $MN\parallel DE$. We have \[\angle(DE,BC) = B - \angle{ADE} = B - \left(90 - \frac{A}{2}\right) = \frac{B-C}{2}.\]We will show that this value is equal to $\angle(MN,BC)$. We see that \[\angle(MN,BC) = \angle{NBC} - \angle{MNB} = \frac{B}{2}-\frac{C}{2},\]as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ezpotd
1252 posts
#181 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
maturity is realizing that no one cares if the synthetic solution is garbage

We use complex numbers. $D$ is the reflection of $B$ over the foot from $F$ to $AB$, so we have $d = 2 \frac 12 (f + a + b -\frac{ab}{f}) - b = a+ f- \frac{ab}{f}$, symmetrically $e = a + g - \frac{ac}{g}$. The condition that $AD = AE$ can be written as $\mid a + f - \frac{ab}{f} - a \mid = \mid a + g - \frac{ac}{g} - a \mid$, which simplifies to $\mid f^2 - ab \mid = \mid g^2 - ac \mid$, using $|x|^2 = x \overline{x}$ gives the condition as $(f^2 - ab)(\frac{1}{f^2} - \frac{1}{ab}) = (g^2 - ac)(\frac{1}{g^2} - \frac{1}{ac})$, upon expansion and cancelling $2$ on both sides this becomes $\frac{f^2}{ab} + \frac{ab}{f^2} = \frac{g^2}{ac} + \frac{ac}{g^2}$, shifting terms and common denominator fives $\frac{f^2c - g^2b}{abc} = \frac{acf^2 - abg^2}{f^2g^2}$, cancelling $f^2c-g^2b$ gives $f^2g^2 = a^2bc$ as the equivalent condition.

Now we desire to prove $\frac{d - e}{f - g}$ is self conjugating, which is equivalent to $\frac{f - g + \frac{ac}{g} - \frac{ab}{f}}{f - g} = \frac{\frac 1f - \frac 1g + \frac{g}{ac} - \frac{f}{ab}}{\frac 1f - \frac 1g}$, multiplying the numerator and denominator of the right hand side gives $\frac{f -g + \frac{f^2g}{ab} - \frac{g^2f}{ac}}{f - g}$, so it suffices to prove $\frac{ac}{g} - \frac{ab}{f} = \frac{f^2g}{ab} - \frac{g^2f}{ac}$, since $f^2g^2 = a^2bc$, we can write $\frac{f^2g}{ab} = \frac{f^2g^2}{gab} = \frac{a^2bc}{gab} = \frac{ac}{g}$, so we are done.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by ezpotd, Sep 25, 2024, 6:06 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Osim_09
36 posts
#182 • 1 Y
Y by cubres
Let GE intersect (ABC) at X and FD intersect (ABC) at Y.Then <FBD=<DYA and <FBD=<FDB=<ADY hence AD=AY.
<GCE=<AXE and <GCE=<GEC=<AEX hence AX=AE (since AD=AE) we have XDEY cyclic.So <YXE=<YDE and <YXE=<YFG hence DE//FG.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Phat_23000245
18 posts
#183
Y by
skibidi toilet :yoda:
Quote:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
bjump
999 posts
#185
Y by
Let $H$ be where the perpendicular bisectors of $DB$, and $EC$ meet. Let $O$ be the circumcenter of $\triangle ABC$, let $P$ and $Q$ be the midpoints of $AB$, and $AC$ respectively, and $K$, and $L$ be the arcmidpoints of $AB$, and $AC$ respectively.
.
Claim: $ONHM$ is a rhombus.

Proof: Note that by perpendicularity to $AB$, and $AC$ we have $ON \parallel HM$, and $OM \parallel HN$. Note that by contruction we have $PI=QJ$ therefore by sliding principal we have $ON \sin( 180^\circ-\angle NOM) = OM \sin(180^\circ - \angle NOM) \implies ON=OM$. Therefore $ON=NH=MH=MO$. $\square$

This means that $M$, and $N$ are symmetric about $OH$, which means that $LG$ and $KF$ are symmetric about $OH$. Therefore $KLGF$ is a cyclic isosceles trapezoid with $KL \parallel FG$ It is well known that the arcmidpoints of $AB$, and $AC$ are perpendicular to the angle bisector of $\angle BAC$, and that $DE$ is also perpendicular to the angle bisector. Therefore we are finished.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Trasher_Cheeser12321
13 posts
#187
Y by
Trying to improve my trig bash (guided by OTIS walkthrough).
[asy]
size(7cm);
pair A = dir(110);
pair B = dir(205);
pair C = dir(335);
pair D = A+0.4dir(degrees(B-A));
pair E = A+0.4dir(degrees(C-A));
pair X = 0.5(B+D);
pair F = intersectionpoints(X+10*dir(degrees(A-B)-90)--X-10*dir(degrees(A-B)-90), circumcircle(A, B, C))[1];
pair Y = 0.5(C+E);
pair G = intersectionpoints(Y+10*dir(degrees(A-C)-90)--Y-10*dir(degrees(A-C)-90), circumcircle(A, B, C))[0];
draw(extension(A, dir(-90), F, G)+dir(degrees(G-extension(A, dir(-90), F, G)))*0.06 -- extension(A, dir(-90), F, G)+dir(degrees(G-extension(A, dir(-90), F, G)))*0.06+dir(degrees(A-dir(-90)))*0.06 -- extension(A, dir(-90), F, G)+dir(degrees(A-dir(-90)))*0.06, red+linewidth(0.5));
draw(A--B--C--cycle);
draw(D--E^^C--G--F--B);
draw(circumcircle(A, B, C));
draw(A--dir(-90), dotted);
dot("$A$", A, dir(A));
dot("$B$", B, dir(B));
dot("$C$", C, dir(C));
dot("$D$", D, dir(160));
dot("$E'$", E, dir(40));
dot("$F$", F, dir(F));
dot("$G'$", G, dir(G));
dot("$P$", extension(A, B, F, G), dir(125));
dot("$Q$", extension(A, C, F, G), dir(60));
[/asy]
Define $G'$ on $(ABC)$ such that $\overline{FG'} \perp \ell$ where $\ell$ is the angle bisector of $A$. Also, define the point $E'$ on $\overline{AC}$ such that $GE' = GC$. The goal is to show that $E = E'$ and $G = G'$.

Claim: $\angle FBA + \frac{\angle B}{2} = \angle G'CA + \frac{\angle{C}}{2}$.
Proof: This can be shown by proving $\angle FBA + \frac{\angle B}{2} + \frac{\angle C}{2} = \angle G'CA + \angle C$:
\begin{align*}
\angle FBA + \frac{\angle B}{2} + \frac{\angle C}{2} &= \angle FBA+\left(90^\circ - \frac{\angle A}{2}\right)\\
&= \angle FBA + \angle APQ\\
&= 180^\circ - \angle BFG' \\
&= \angle G'CB
\end{align*}which is equal to $\angle G'CA + \angle C$. $\blacksquare$

The rest can be done with trig bash. Let $x = \angle FBA - \frac{\angle C}{2} = \angle GCA - \frac{\angle B}{2}$.
\begin{align*}
\frac{BF}{\sin \angle FAB} = 2R \quad \Longrightarrow \quad BF &= 2R \sin \angle FAB\\
&= 2R\sin(\angle C - \angle FBA)\\
&= 2R\sin\left(\frac{\angle C}{2}-x\right).\\\\
BD=BF\cos\angle FBA \quad \Longrightarrow \quad BD &= 4R\sin\left(\frac{\angle C}{2}\right)\cos\left(\frac{\angle C}{2}+x\right)\\
&= 2R\left(\sin(-2x)+\sin\angle C\right) \qquad\qquad\qquad\quad \text{(product to sum)}\\
&= 2R\left(\sin\angle C-\sin(2x)\right).\\\\
AD = AB-BD \quad \Longrightarrow \quad AD &= (2R\sin\angle C) - 2R(\sin\angle C-\sin(2x))\\
&= 2R\sin(2x)
\end{align*}Doing the same thing on the other side, $AE'$ can also be calculated to be equal to $2R\sin(2x)$. Therefore, $AD=AE'$, meaning $E = E'$. It then also follows that $G=G'$. $\blacksquare$.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a