Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
1 viewing
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
Geometry
MathsII-enjoy   0
20 minutes ago
Given triangle $ABC$ inscribed in $(O)$, $S$ is the midpoint of arc $BAC$ of $(O)$. The perpendicular bisector $BO$ intersects $BS$ at $I$. $(I;IB)$ intersects $AB$ at $U$ different from $B$. $H$ is the orthocenter of triangle $ABC$. Prove that $UH$ = $US$
0 replies
1 viewing
MathsII-enjoy
20 minutes ago
0 replies
Find x such that x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1 is perfect square (old)
Amir Hossein   6
N 25 minutes ago by zhoujef000
Find all numbers $x \in \mathbb Z$ for which the number
\[x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1\]
is a perfect square.
6 replies
Amir Hossein
Oct 3, 2010
zhoujef000
25 minutes ago
Number Theory Chain!
JetFire008   54
N 25 minutes ago by JetFire008
I will post a question and someone has to answer it. Then they have to post a question and someone else will answer it and so on. We can only post questions related to Number Theory and each problem should be more difficult than the previous. Let's start!

Question 1
54 replies
JetFire008
Apr 7, 2025
JetFire008
25 minutes ago
Divisibility NT FE
CHESSR1DER   7
N 31 minutes ago by CHESSR1DER
Source: Own
Find all functions $f$ $N \iff N$ such for any $a,b$:
$(a+b)|a^{f(b)} + b^{f(a)}$.
7 replies
CHESSR1DER
Yesterday at 7:07 PM
CHESSR1DER
31 minutes ago
No more topics!
Straightedge to draw midpoints
anantmudgal09   42
N Jul 29, 2024 by L13832
Source: INMO 2021 Problem 3
Betal marks $2021$ points on the plane such that no three are collinear, and draws all possible segments joining these. He then chooses any $1011$ of these segments, and marks their midpoints. Finally, he chooses a segment whose midpoint is not marked yet, and challenges Vikram to construct its midpoint using only a straightedge. Can Vikram always complete this challenge?

Note. A straightedge is an infinitely long ruler without markings, which can only be used to draw the line joining any two given distinct points.

Proposed by Prithwijit De and Sutanay Bhattacharya
42 replies
anantmudgal09
Mar 7, 2021
L13832
Jul 29, 2024
Straightedge to draw midpoints
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: INMO 2021 Problem 3
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
anantmudgal09
1979 posts
#1 • 9 Y
Y by nikaaryu, Rg230403, meet18, Aritra12, p_square, NumberX, OlympusHero, sotpidot, bobjoe123
Betal marks $2021$ points on the plane such that no three are collinear, and draws all possible segments joining these. He then chooses any $1011$ of these segments, and marks their midpoints. Finally, he chooses a segment whose midpoint is not marked yet, and challenges Vikram to construct its midpoint using only a straightedge. Can Vikram always complete this challenge?

Note. A straightedge is an infinitely long ruler without markings, which can only be used to draw the line joining any two given distinct points.

Proposed by Prithwijit De and Sutanay Bhattacharya
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
anantmudgal09
1979 posts
#2 • 11 Y
Y by nikaaryu, Pluto1708, RudraRockstar, Dr_Vex, Aimingformygoal, cowcow, Euler1728, sotpidot, Siddharth03, hakN, BVKRB-
My solution (terser than the official):

Solution
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by anantmudgal09, Mar 7, 2021, 11:17 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
amar_04
1915 posts
#3 • 7 Y
Y by Dr_Vex, Aimingformygoal, Mathematicsislovely, gowtham_doma, sanyalarnab, Bumblebee60, PRMOisTheHardestExam
Kinda straightforward. But I liked this one. We will be using our weapons Parallelo456 and Midsegmento789 from here. Notice that if there $n$ odd points in the plane, and there are $\frac{(n+1)}{2}$ line segments joining some of the $n$ points, then atleast two of the line segments have a common vertex. So we are just left to prove this famous fact.

$\textbf{FACT:}$ $ABC$ be a triangle with midpoints $BC,CA,AB$ marked, then for any segment $PQ$ in the plane we can find its midpoint only using a straightedge.

Using Parallelo456 we can draw a line through $P$ parallel to $AB$ and a line through $Q$ parallel to $AC$. Suppose both those lines meet at $V$. Using Midsegmento789 we can get the midpoints $X,Y$ of $PV,QV$. Now let $QX\cap PY=M$. Thus $KM\cap PQ$ is the midpoint of the segment $PQ$ . $\quad\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by amar_04, Mar 7, 2021, 11:32 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Dr_Vex
562 posts
#4 • 1 Y
Y by amar_04
More (similar) ruler constructions can be found here

Edit: A similar idea was used in solving Sharygin P21 this year as pointed by amar_04
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Dr_Vex, Mar 7, 2021, 11:38 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
554183
484 posts
#5
Y by
$                     $
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by 554183, Mar 7, 2021, 11:56 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
a2048
314 posts
#6 • 2 Y
Y by ChiefEditorQuibbler, spicemax
How to draw parallel line using only straightedge ?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Sumitrajput0271
8 posts
#7
Y by
I think you didn't considered the case when four points form a trapezium with midpoint marked on opposite sides .
With use of straightedge you can find midpoint of other 2 sides and diagonals of that figure
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Sumitrajput0271, Mar 7, 2021, 11:51 AM
Reason: Spelling mistake
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
NumberX
260 posts
#8 • 1 Y
Y by Dem0nfang
Here's another (a little complicated for no reason at all) sol. We know we have a triangle and we can prove that we can convert any connected component into a clique. Now we prove that Given a triangle ABC, with midpoints DEF, we can connect BP for any P. To see this let PC meet EF at G. Then notice that the line connecting $CF \cap DE$ and $BE \cap DF$ is parallel and midway between EF and BC. let this intersect DG at M, then if M intersects DG at K and K intersect EF at S, then SGCD is a parallelogram and so just extend DS to meet PB at its midpoint. Now if we connect everything to B, its all connected so boom.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
508669
1040 posts
#9 • 1 Y
Y by RudraRockstar
anantmudgal09 wrote:
My solution (terser than the official):

Solution

I did prove the lemma that you mentioned and showed and used php, can I expect at least 3 marks?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
spicemax
30 posts
#10
Y by
How can one draw a parallel line using only a straightedge? :huh:

Thanks @below
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by spicemax, Mar 7, 2021, 3:45 PM
Reason: (Question was answered)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
amar_04
1915 posts
#11 • 7 Y
Y by lneis1, Mathematicsislovely, Aimingformygoal, Siddharth03, spicemax, Bumblebee60, Aritra12
spicemax wrote:
How can one draw a parallel line using only a straightedge? :huh:

It is mentioned in the problem that the line segments have their midpoints marked. So your question should be "how can one draw a line parallel to a line segment which has its midpoint marked". Refer to the diagram here
This is how we do it. The red segment $AB$ and its midpoint $M$ are given and we want to draw a line through $P$ parallel to $AB$. Take $X$ to be a point on $AP$. Let $XM\cap BP=V$ and let $AV\cap XB=Q$. By Ceva's Theorem we get $\frac{XP}{PA}\cdot\frac{AM}{MB}\cdot\frac{BQ}{QA}=1$ and as $AM=MB$ we have $\frac{XP}{PA}=\frac{XQ}{QB}$. Hence, by Thales we have $PQ\parallel AB$.
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by amar_04, Mar 7, 2021, 3:31 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
p_square
442 posts
#12 • 3 Y
Y by lneis1, Mathematicsislovely, spicemax
The statement of this theorem felt slightly scam, since all we really need is that there are points $A,B,C$ such that the midpoint of $AB = M$ and midpoint of $AC = N$. With the above configuration, one can find the midpoint of any segment $UV$. Observe by PHP that we indeed do have a structure similar to what is above described. Even so, I really liked the problem.

The following two claims are crucial. [having seen them before helped :p]
Claim 1: Given segment $AB$ with midpoint $M$, once can construct a line parallel to $AB$
Proof: Pick arbitrary $C$, $X$ on $CM$ and let $AX, BX$ meet $BC, AC$ at $Y, Z$. By Ceva's $YZ$ is the desired line.

Claim 2: Given segment $AB$ and parallel line $YZ$, one can construct the midpoint of $BC$
Proof: Let $AY$ meet $BZ$ at $X$ and let $AZ$ meet $BY$ at $C$. By Ceva's $CX$ passes through the midpoint of $AB$.

Main proof:
We use this rewording:
The statement of this theorem felt slightly scam, since all we really need is that there are points $A,B,C$ such that the midpoint of $AB = M$ and midpoint of $AC = N$. With the above configuration, find the midpoint of any segment $UV$.

Let $X, Y$ be the midpoints of $MB$ and $NC$. By claim 1 we can draw line parallel to $AB\AC$ and by claim 2 we can draw in $X, Y$. Let $BC$, $XY$ and $MN$ meet $UV$ at $I, J$ and $K$. Observe that $J$ is the midpoint of $IK$. By claim 1 draw a line parallel to $IK$, and by claim $2$ draw in the midpoint of $UV$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
guptaamitu1
656 posts
#13 • 2 Y
Y by amar_04, Mathematicsislovely
How can we draw parallel lines using a straight edge only (we don't even have a compass) ??
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
biomathematics
2566 posts
#14 • 1 Y
Y by p_square
guptaamitu1 wrote:
How can we draw parallel lines using a straight edge only (we don't even have a compass) ??

read the solution immediately above this post of yours.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mathematicsislovely
245 posts
#15 • 5 Y
Y by RAMUGAUSS, amar_04, Euler1728, Aritra12, Mango247
Lemma: Given a segment $AB$.And another segment $CD$ parallel to $AB$ and midpoint $M$ of $CD$.Then it is possible to construct midpoint of $AB$ using straightedge.
[asy]
 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(8.cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = 2., xmax = 10., ymin = -1., ymax = 3.5;  /* image dimensions */

 /* draw figures */
draw((2.66,2.28)--(9.1,2.28), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((3.12,0.12)--(8.48,0.12), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((2.66,2.28)--(8.48,0.12), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((9.1,2.28)--(3.12,0.12), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((xmin, 26.999999999999893*xmin-156.4799999999994)--(xmax, 26.999999999999893*xmax-156.4799999999994), linewidth(0.8)); /* line */
 /* dots and labels */
dot((2.66,2.28),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$A$", (2.74,2.36), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((9.1,2.28),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$B$", (9.18,2.36), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((3.12,0.12),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$C$", (3.2,0.2), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.48,0.12),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$D$", (8.56,0.2), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((5.8,0.12),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$M$", (5.88,0.2), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((5.836338983050848,1.1011525423728812),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$X$", (5.92,1.18), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((5.88,2.28),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F$", (5.96,2.36), NE * labelscalefactor); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */
[/asy]
Proof. At least one of $AC\cap BD$,$AD\cap BC$ will not be a point at infinity.Wlog, $AD\cap BC=X\ne P_{\infty}$.Then $XM$ bisects $AB$.$\quad\square$

Now given $n$ points [$n$ odd] and $\frac{n+1}{2}$ segments each with end point from the $n$ points. Then we can find 2 segments which are not parallel. Indeed, among $n$ points there can be at most $\frac{n-1}{2}$ segments parallel to a particular direction.
Let We want to bisect $AB$.
Suppose there is a segment parallel to $AB$ whose midpoint is marked. Then using the lemma we are done.Otherwise, assume no segment with marked midpoint is parallel to $AB$.Suppose $XY$,$MN$ are 2 segment such that midpoint of $XY$ and $MN$ is marked and $XY$ and $MN$ are not parallel.

Given any segment $XY$ and its midpoint and given any other point $P$. It is possible to draw a parallel line of $XY$ through $CD$.proof
[asy]
 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(12.cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = 2., xmax = 14., ymin = -3., ymax = 4.;  /* image dimensions */
pen ffqqff = rgb(1.,0.,1.); 
 /* draw figures */
draw((4.6,2.7)--(9.02,2.72), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((4.24,-0.14)--(8.86,-2.12), linewidth(0.8) + blue); 
draw((11.56,2.02)--(12.62,-0.44), linewidth(0.8) + ffqqff); 
draw((6.106445534619243,4.342777344185527)--(8.06642323558925,-0.20585015051845357), linewidth(0.8) + linetype("4 4") + ffqqff); 
draw((8.346582673653696,4.282836436615007)--(10.994514438621918,-1.8623636971791737), linewidth(0.8) + ffqqff); 
draw((4.6,2.7)--(10.031680911680908,0.37213675213675307), linewidth(0.8) + blue); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((4.6,2.7),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$A$", (4.7066,2.7994), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((9.02,2.72),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$B$", (9.111,2.8236), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((4.24,-0.14),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$X$", (4.3436,-0.032), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.86,-2.12),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$Y$", (8.9658,-2.0164), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((11.56,2.02),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$M$", (11.652,2.1218), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((12.62,-0.44),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$N$", (12.7168,-0.3466), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((10.031680911680908,0.37213675213675307),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$K$", (10.1274,0.4762), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((7.315840455840454,1.5360683760683767),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$G$", (7.417,1.6378), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((9.525840455840454,1.5460683760683767),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$R$", (9.6192,1.6378), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((6.81,2.71),linewidth(2.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$C$", (6.9088,2.7994), NE * labelscalefactor); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */
[/asy]
So draw a parallel line of $XY$ through $A$,draw a parallel line of $MN$ through $B$.[This can be done since mid-point of $XY$,$MN$ is marked.] Let them intersects at $K$.By the lemma it is possible to find mid-point $G$ of $KA$,midpoint $R$ of $KB$ [Since,$KA||XY$ and mid-point of $XY$ is given,$KB||MN$,midpoint of $MN$ is given.
Now again it is possible to draw a parallel line to $BK$ through $G$ since midpoint of $BK$ is $R$.This line passes through midpoint of $AB$.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Mathematicsislovely, Mar 7, 2021, 5:56 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Abhaysingh2003
222 posts
#16 • 11 Y
Y by Dr_Vex, Aimingformygoal, 554183, Euler1728, MathsMadman, Epistle, yofro, rama1728, amar_04, Mango247, Professor33
Vikram Betal. :rotfl: (Old Bengali Cartoon :D).Next time Nonte and fonte pls or maybe motu patlu. :roll:
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by Abhaysingh2003, Mar 7, 2021, 7:03 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mehul_the_nerd
2 posts
#17
Y by
anantmudgal09 wrote:
My solution (terser than the official):

Solution
You cannot draw parallel lines, as stated in the problem, you can only draw lines bw two known, given points
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CrazyBoy2.0
13 posts
#18 • 1 Y
Y by Mango247
@anantmudgal09 Sir, I think my solution is a bit easier. As no 3 are collinear we can form a triangle between any 3 of the points I use a single marked line to get the midpoints for all the other lines. I take an unmarked line AB and a marked line CD (Midpoint be P). In triangle ACD with base as AD then as we know the midpoint of CD, I place the straight edge on AD and translate it until it touches P without changing its orientation. Mark its intersection point with AC as Q. Now we have the midpoint of AC. Now repeat the same with triangle ABC with BC as the base, we get the midpoint of AB. If we repeat this process many times then we can find the midpoint of all the lines
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CrazyBoy2.0
13 posts
#19
Y by
@anantmudgal09 Sir, Could you please tell me how much can I fetch.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
gabrupro
249 posts
#20
Y by
@above sorry for being rude but that’s a clear 0.
EDIT: because translation is not allowed
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by gabrupro, Mar 8, 2021, 3:44 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CrazyBoy2.0
13 posts
#22 • 1 Y
Y by Mango247
@above I am sorry, but I think the solution that Mr. Anant Mudgal and @amar_04 have proposed is based on the fact that we can draw a parallel line. Then how isn't it the same case as mine. And also it is a ruler In practical situations we can translate it without changing its direction.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
N1RAV
160 posts
#23
Y by
Consider a case in which the distance between some two points is $1$ Million Trillion light years.... So how are you going to translate it?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
L567
1184 posts
#24 • 1 Y
Y by p_square
Also, how can you translate a straightedge without altering its orientation even slightly?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
biomathematics
2566 posts
#25 • 12 Y
Y by Math-wiz, Rg230403, MathsMadman, 554183, Kayak, Aarth, Pluto1708, spicemax, N1RAV, pieuler, Hamroldt, Supercali
N1RAV wrote:
Consider a case in which the distance between some two points is $1$ Million Trillion light years.... So how are you going to translate it?

I can't tell if you're being serious or not.
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by biomathematics, Mar 9, 2021, 2:40 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
N1RAV
160 posts
#26 • 4 Y
Y by amar_04, Mango247, Mango247, Mango247
biomathematics wrote:
N1RAV wrote:
Consider a case in which the distance between some two points is $1$ Million Trillion light years.... So how are you going to translate it?

I can't tell if you're being serious or not.

I meant that the proof in #18 is wrong
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CrazyBoy2.0
13 posts
#27
Y by
@above Please note that it is an infinite ruler.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CrazyBoy2.0
13 posts
#28
Y by
@L567 It is an ideal case. Just like a frictionless surface and an infinite ruler.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
biomathematics
2566 posts
#29
Y by
CrazyBoy2.0 wrote:
@above Please note that it is an infinite ruler.

unfortunately it's not correct anyway. you can't "hand-translate" a straightedge. a proof cannot be an experimental idea with human error.

When we mean straightedge, we mean that given any two points on the plane we can make a line through them. that's all the power that a straightedge has.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by biomathematics, Mar 9, 2021, 3:26 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
L567
1184 posts
#30
Y by
CrazyBoy2.0 wrote:
@L567 It is an ideal case. Just like a frictionless surface and an infinite ruler.

The question itself specifies..., that it can only be used to draw the line between any two points, thats it, you cant translate it and draw parallel lines
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
i3435
1350 posts
#31 • 2 Y
Y by amar_04, starchan
Infinite ruler means we can draw points at infinity along with the line at infinity
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CrazyBoy2.0
13 posts
#32
Y by
@biomathematics You can't take human error in an ideal condition.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CrazyBoy2.0
13 posts
#33
Y by
@L567 Nevertheless it is a ruler. I will just modify its purpose. You can translate a scale without changing its direction. Why not an infinite one?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
biomathematics
2566 posts
#34
Y by
Don't treat it as a physical ruler. Just imagine that Vikram can join two points and extend it both sides infinitely.

Also, besides the problem, I really want to know how you can translate an unmarked scale and keep it parallel.

idk how to explain any further.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by biomathematics, Mar 9, 2021, 5:38 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
L567
1184 posts
#35
Y by
CrazyBoy2.0 wrote:
@L567 Nevertheless it is a ruler. I will just modify its purpose. You can translate a scale without changing its direction. Why not an infinite one?

Because the problem clearly states that all you can use it for is to draw a line between two points, thats it, you cant do any more with it
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CrazyBoy2.0
13 posts
#36
Y by
@biomathematics I know I shouldn't use vector algebra in INMO. But I am going to use it now. Consider the base vector as AK(bar). If you place a ruler on it then it is going to represent that vector multiplied by scalar (As I don't know the length of ruler and vector).

Now we have assumed that the ruler is a vector.
According to the definition of free vector, A free vector can be translated anywhere in the space without changing its magnitude and direction.
So I translate it to another point in space without changing its direction.(Magnitude unknown).

Now we get a parallel vector.

You can verify it practically by using my solution.(It's gonna be an example of the practical application)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Dr_Vex
562 posts
#37
Y by
CrazyBoy2.0 wrote:
I know I shouldn't use vector algebra in INMO. But I am going to use it now

You can, if I am not wrong
CrazyBoy2.0 wrote:
Now we have assumed that the ruler is a vector..So I translate it to another point in space without changing its direction.(Magnitude unknown).

Ummm, no you can't do that
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Dr_Vex, Mar 10, 2021, 2:04 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
N1RAV
160 posts
#38
Y by
@CrazyBoy2.0 Arguing here wont help anyhow... and definitely your solution is wrong according to me and if you don't get a 17 for this problem, then kindly read all these posts again and try to understand the meaning of the words used in the question :)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CrazyBoy2.0
13 posts
#39
Y by
@Dr.Vex He is asking practically. See the second paragraph.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
5001 posts
#41 • 8 Y
Y by L567, p_square, biomathematics, RudraRockstar, centslordm, Wizard0001, Pranav1056, CRT_07
To modify the purpose of the straightedge (especially when its purpose is clearly stated!) is quite simply put, absurd.
It is as if someone wrote the following solution to IMO 2017 P3 (Hunter and Rabbit):
"We modify the tracking device such that it always reports the exact location of the rabbit. Then the hunter can always move to the rabbit's location and clearly guarantee it stays close enough to the rabbit. QED"
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by IAmTheHazard, Mar 10, 2021, 2:13 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
N1RAV
160 posts
#42
Y by
IAmTheHazard wrote:
To modify the purpose of the straightedge (especially when its purpose is clearly stated!) is quite simply put, absurd.
It is as if someone wrote the following solution to IMO 2017 P3 (Hunter and Rabbit):
"We modify the tracking device such that it always reports the exact location of the rabbit. Then the hunter can always move to the rabbit's location and clearly guarantee it stays close enough to the rabbit. QED"

haha, that corresponds to $-7$ on the IMO

@39 tbh @Dr_Vex is correct and you are wrong, and still if you think you are correct, you keep you explanation with yourself (Sorry if I sound rude), and I request all others not to reply

Thanks
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by N1RAV, Mar 10, 2021, 3:15 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CrazyBoy2.0
13 posts
#43
Y by
@Abhaysingh2003 For God's sake I just have 2 accounts and this is created 'cause I forgot my password to the old one and my email is unavailable that time. Now my primary account is gone.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
blackbluecar
302 posts
#44 • 3 Y
Y by PRMOisTheHardestExam, Mango247, CRT_07
Cool problem

The answer is yes. By PHP we see that there is a pair of segments with marked midpoints share and endpoint. Let these segments be $PA$ and $PB$ with midpoints $M_B$ and $M_A$, respectively. Given any other point $C$, we claim we construct the midpoint of $PC$.

Indeed, mark the point $X$ which is the intersection of $AP$ and $BC$. Notice that in any triangle with two marked midpoints, we can mark the third midpoint by marking the centroid and drawing the line between the last vertex and the centroid, call this fact $(\star)$. By $(\star)$ on $PAB$ we can mark the midpoint $M_P$ of $AB$. Extending $M_PM_A$ intersects $BX$ at it's midpoint $N$. By $( \star )$ on $BPX$, we can mark the midpoint $K$ of $PX$. Finally, the midpoint of $PC$ is the intersection of $KM_A$ and $PC$.

Thus, we can construct the midpoints of a segment with endpoint $P$. Doing this quickly increases the number of midpoints, and repeatedly doing the process above yields every possible midpoint between any two of the $2021$ points.
Attachments:
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by blackbluecar, Jul 1, 2022, 9:44 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
L13832
262 posts
#45 • 1 Y
Y by CRT_07
Claim I: Given 2 segments $AB$ and $AC$ with their midpoints, the midpoints of BC can also be constructed using a straightedge.
Claim II: Given a segment $AB$, its midpoint , and any point C, a parallel line can be drawn through $C$
Claim III: Given 2 non-parallel segments $AB, BC$ with their midpoints $M, N$, midpoint of any other segment $DE$ can be constructed using a straight-edge.

After proving these claims you can easily move by contradiction because if no 2 segments will share an endpoint, then we will have 2022 endpoints, which is false, so at least 2 segments can have their midpoints marked, if those two segments are AB and BC, they cannot be parallel
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a