Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
Find the Maximum
Jackson0423   0
a few seconds ago
Source: Own.
Let \( ABC \) be a triangle with \( AB \leq AC \) and \( \angle BAC = 60^\circ \).
A point \( X \) inside triangle \( ABC \) satisfies the following conditions:
\[
XA^2 + BC^2 \leq XC^2 + AB^2 \leq XB^2 + AC^2.
\]Find the maximum value of \( m \) such that
\[
\frac{XA}{AC} \geq m.
\]
0 replies
Jackson0423
a few seconds ago
0 replies
best source for inequalitys
Namisgood   0
14 minutes ago
I need some help do I am beginner and have completed Number theory and almost all of algebra (except inequalitys) can anybody suggest a book or resource from where I can study inequalitys
0 replies
Namisgood
14 minutes ago
0 replies
Geometry with parallel lines.
falantrng   33
N 25 minutes ago by L13832
Source: RMM 2018,D1 P1
Let $ABCD$ be a cyclic quadrilateral an let $P$ be a point on the side $AB.$ The diagonals $AC$ meets the segments $DP$ at $Q.$ The line through $P$ parallel to $CD$ mmets the extension of the side $CB$ beyond $B$ at $K.$ The line through $Q$ parallel to $BD$ meets the extension of the side $CB$ beyond $B$ at $L.$ Prove that the circumcircles of the triangles $BKP$ and $CLQ$ are tangent .
33 replies
falantrng
Feb 24, 2018
L13832
25 minutes ago
Kinda lookimg Like AM-GM
Atillaa   0
34 minutes ago
Show that for all positive real numbers \( a, b, c \), the following inequality always holds:
\[
\frac{ab}{b+1} + \frac{bc}{c+1} + \frac{ca}{a+1} \geq \frac{3abc}{1 + abc}
\]
0 replies
Atillaa
34 minutes ago
0 replies
No more topics!
Lines intersecting on the circumcircle (BxMO 2023, Problem 3)
Lepuslapis   15
N Mar 31, 2025 by GeorgeMetrical123
Source: BxMO 2023, Problem 3
Let $ABC$ be a triangle with incentre $I$ and circumcircle $\omega$. Let $N$ denote the second point of intersection of line $AI$ and $\omega$. The line through $I$ perpendicular to $AI$ intersects line $BC$, segment $[AB]$, and segment $[AC]$ at the points $D$, $E$, and $F$, respectively. The circumcircle of triangle $AEF$ meets $\omega$ again at $P$, and lines $PN$ and $BC$ intersect at $Q$. Prove that lines $IQ$ and $DN$ intersect on $\omega$.
15 replies
Lepuslapis
May 6, 2023
GeorgeMetrical123
Mar 31, 2025
Lines intersecting on the circumcircle (BxMO 2023, Problem 3)
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: BxMO 2023, Problem 3
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Lepuslapis
78 posts
#1
Y by
Let $ABC$ be a triangle with incentre $I$ and circumcircle $\omega$. Let $N$ denote the second point of intersection of line $AI$ and $\omega$. The line through $I$ perpendicular to $AI$ intersects line $BC$, segment $[AB]$, and segment $[AC]$ at the points $D$, $E$, and $F$, respectively. The circumcircle of triangle $AEF$ meets $\omega$ again at $P$, and lines $PN$ and $BC$ intersect at $Q$. Prove that lines $IQ$ and $DN$ intersect on $\omega$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
PNT
320 posts
#2 • 1 Y
Y by Funcshun840
Hint : Prove that the intersection point is the point of tangency of the mixtilinear incircle.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Orestis_Lignos
555 posts
#3 • 1 Y
Y by MS_asdfgzxcvb
This was quite classical. Let $M$ be the midpoint of major arc $BC$. We split the proof into two Claims.

Claim 1: Lines $MI$ and $DN$ meet on $\omega$.
Proof: Let $DN$ intersect $\omega$ at point $S$. Since

$\angle DIB=\angle AIB-\angle AIE=(90^\circ+\dfrac{\angle C}{2})-90^\circ=\dfrac{\angle C}{2}=\angle ICB,$

we obtain that $DI$ is tangent to circle $(BIC)$. Thus,

$DI^2=DB \cdot DC=DS \cdot DN,$

and so $IS$ is perpendicular to $DN$, that is $\angle ISN=90^\circ=\angle MSN$, hence points $M,I,S$ are collinear, as desired $\blacksquare$

Claim 2: Points $M,I,Q$ are collinear.
Proof: Let $MI$ intersect $BC$ at point $Q'$. Then, by spiral similarity and the fact that $PQ$ bisects $\angle BPC$, we obtain

$\dfrac{BQ}{QC}=\dfrac{BP}{PC}=\dfrac{BE}{CF}$

Now, by Menelaus' theorem and the fact that $DI$ is tangent to $(BIC)$, we easily obtain that

$\dfrac{BE}{CF}=\dfrac{DB}{DC}=\dfrac{BI^2}{CI^2}$

Now, note that by an application of the ratio lemma and some sine laws,

$\dfrac{BQ'}{Q'C}=\dfrac{BM}{MC} \cdot \dfrac{\sin \angle BMI}{\sin \angle CMI}=\dfrac{BI^2}{CI^2},$

hence the two ratios $\dfrac{BQ}{QC}$ and $\dfrac{BQ'}{Q'C}$ are equal, and so $Q \equiv Q'$, as desired $\blacksquare$

To the problem, combining both claims we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
straight
412 posts
#4
Y by
Similar to https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h476508p2667975, Iran TST 2012 Day 1Q2
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
PNT
320 posts
#5
Y by
PNT wrote:
Hint : Prove that the intersection point is the point of tangency of the mixtilinear incircle.
First let's prove that $DN\cap \omega =T$ where $T$ is the point of tangency of the mixtilinear incircle.
Let $DN\cap \omega =T'$ and $M$ the midpoint of arc $BAC$ then we want to prove that $M,I$ and $T'$ are collinear or equivalently $\angle BT'I=90^{\circ}$, but $\angle DIN=90^{\circ}$ so it suffices to prove $DT'\cdot DN=DI^2$. We have
$$DT'\cdot DN=DB\cdot DC=DI^2$$That's because $DI$ is tangent to $(BIC)$. Therefore $T'=T$.
Note that $\angle DPN=\angle DPT+\angle TPN=\angle MNT+\angle TMN=90^{\circ}$ (We proved this above) that means $D,P$ and $M$ are collinear. Now define $Q'=MT\cap BC$, proving $Q=Q'$ will finish the problem.
Since
$$-1=(B,C;N,M)\overset{P}{=}(D,Q;B,C)\overset{M}{=}(P,T'';B,C)$$That means $PT''$ and $PN$ meet on $BC$ so $Q=Q'$.
Attachments:
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by PNT, May 10, 2023, 6:35 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Cusofay
85 posts
#6
Y by
PNT wrote:
PNT wrote:
Hint : Prove that the intersection point is the point of tangency of the mixtilinear incircle.
First let's prove that $DN\cap \omega =T$ where $T$ is the point of tangency of the mixtilinear incircle.
Let $DN\cap \omega =T'$ and $M$ the midpoint of arc $BAC$ then we want to prove that $M,I$ and $T'$ are collinear or equivalently $\angle BT'I=90^{\circ}$, but $\angle DIN=90^{\circ}$ so it suffices to prove $DT'\cdot DN=DI^2$. We have
$$DT'\cdot DN=DB\cdot DC=DI^2$$That's because $DI$ is tangent to $(BIC)$. Therefore $T'=T$.
Note that $\angle DPN=\angle DPT+\angle TPN=\angle MNT+\angle TMN=90^{\circ}$ (We proved this above) that means $D,P$ and $M$ are collinear. Now define $Q'=MT\cap BC$, proving $Q=Q'$ will finish the problem.
Since
$$-1=(B,C;N,M)\overset{P}{=}(D,Q;B,C)\overset{M}{=}(P,T'';B,C)$$That means $PT''$ and $PN$ meet on $BC$ so $Q=Q'$.

You assumed the collinearity when you stated that $\angle DPT = \angle MNT$, here's a proof for the collinearity:
Notice that $P$ is the center of the homothety sending $BE$ to $CF$, and since $D$ is the intersection of $(EF)$ and $(BC)$ then $PEBD$ IS cyclic, thus $\angle PDI= \angle PDE = \angle PBE = \angle PBA = \angle PNA = \angle PNI$ thus, $PIND$ is cyclic and this gives us $\angle DPN = 90$.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Cusofay, Apr 5, 2024, 8:56 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
bin_sherlo
688 posts
#7 • 1 Y
Y by erkosfobiladol
$\angle DIB=\angle \frac{C}{2}=\angle ICB \implies DI^2=DB.DC=DK.DN \implies \angle IKD=90$
Let's prove that $QK \perp DN$
$\angle APE=180-\frac{B+C}{2}$ and $\angle APB=180-C \implies \angle EPB=\frac{B-C}{2}=\angle EDB$
$\implies P,E,D,B$ are cyclic.
$\angle PNI=\angle PNA=\angle PBA= \angle PBE=\angle PDE=\angle PDI \implies P,D,N,I$ are cyclic. So $\angle DPN=90$
Also $\angle BPN=\angle \frac{A}{2}=\angle BPN,$ $NK.ND=NI^2=NB^2=NQ.NP$ which means $P,D,K,Q$ are cyclic.
$\implies QK \perp DN$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Om245
163 posts
#8
Y by
We redefines everything :)

Let $T$ be mixtilinear Incircles touch point.Note that circle pass though $E$ and $F$

Define $Y$ be antipode of $N$ then we know $\overline{Y-I-T}$ and $\angle YTN = 90$
Let $D = NT \cap BC$ and $M$ be midpoint of $BC$. Redefine $Q = DM \cap YT$
Now note $Q$ is orthocenter of $\triangle YND$.

Redefine $P = DY \cap (ABC)$ now we get $NP \perp DY$
Now if we prove $P$ lie on $(AEF)$ we are done

[asy]
 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(12.603703365062785cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = -15.889434907857462, xmax = 42.71426845720532, ymin = -19.217449558241984, ymax = 11.666426980388458;  /* image dimensions */
pen zzttqq = rgb(0.6,0.2,0.); pen ffxfqq = rgb(1.,0.4980392156862745,0.); pen qqwuqq = rgb(0.,0.39215686274509803,0.); pen yqqqyq = rgb(0.5019607843137255,0.,0.5019607843137255); 

draw((4.676888221431007,6.213756330118006)--(1.46,-5.72)--(19.64,-5.64)--cycle, linewidth(0.8) + zzttqq); 
draw((10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023)--(-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025)--(10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327)--cycle, linewidth(0.4) + qqwuqq); 
 /* draw figures */
draw((4.676888221431007,6.213756330118006)--(1.46,-5.72), linewidth(0.8) + zzttqq); 
draw((19.64,-5.64)--(4.676888221431007,6.213756330118006), linewidth(0.8) + zzttqq); 
draw(circle((10.532773253911554,-1.7652219514006515), 9.897246280181983), linewidth(0.8) + ffxfqq); 
draw((4.676888221431007,6.213756330118006)--(7.165969753513003,-1.3285130495083106), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw(circle((6.460477994055081,0.8092268462545278), 5.69123285580188), linewidth(0.8) + red); 
draw((0.8133189006186733,0.10231412718850881)--(10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw(circle((2.166374291986518,-8.708135767461185), 8.913741427607286), linewidth(0.8) + qqwuqq); 
draw((-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025)--(10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((10.55,-5.68)--(10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023)--(4.309242492561626,-9.460879739602213), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327)--(10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw(circle((7.165969753513002,-1.3285130495083102), 4.366335898317111), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw(circle((8.244067766679159,-4.595302637608951), 6.257530700945483), linewidth(0.8) + yqqqyq); 
draw((-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025)--(10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((7.165969753513003,-1.3285130495083106)--(10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((12.12973919618593,0.3096181584070275)--(-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((0.8133189006186733,0.10231412718850881)--(7.165969753513003,-1.3285130495083106), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((0.8133189006186733,0.10231412718850881)--(10.55,-5.68), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023)--(-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025), linewidth(0.4) + qqwuqq); 
draw((-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025)--(10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327), linewidth(0.4) + qqwuqq); 
draw((10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327)--(10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023), linewidth(0.4) + qqwuqq); 
draw((-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025)--(19.64,-5.64), linewidth(0.8)); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((4.676888221431007,6.213756330118006),dotstyle); 
label("$A$", (4.2985779297551305,6.610825809810868), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1.46,-5.72),dotstyle); 
label("$B$", (0.7906097705788365,-6.561250709449108), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((19.64,-5.64),dotstyle); 
label("$C$", (19.774908043768193,-5.2887524556302585), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((7.165969753513003,-1.3285130495083106),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$I$", (7.118709194975288,-3.087674394970628), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$D$", (-6.741204218240854,-4.5665237169763175), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((2.202200310840074,-2.96664425742365),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$E$", (1.1689200622547113,-2.7781477926903677), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((12.12973919618593,0.3096181584070275),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F$", (12.277485899646308,0.5922529876946916), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((0.8133189006186733,0.10231412718850881),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$P$", (-0.06918634686633351,0.4202937642056579), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$N$", (11.7272163844814,-11.238541588350822), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((10.55,-5.68),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$M$", (11.7272163844814,-6.630034398844721), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((5.629779458335351,-5.701651135496874),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$Q$", (5.502292494178368,-7.214695758707435), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((4.309242492561626,-9.460879739602213),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$T$", (3.679524725194608,-10.860231296674948), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$Y$", (11.589649005690173,7.1610953249757765), NE * labelscalefactor); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */

[/asy]


from $\angle DPN = \angle DIN = \angle DMN = 90 \implies D,P,I,M,N$ are cyclic.
which give us $\angle IPM = \angle IDM$

Now as $I$ and $M$ are midpoint of $EF$ and $BC$ and $P$ lie on $(ABC)$
$P$ is miqual point of complete quadrilateral $BCFE$ and hence from $A = BE \cap CF$ we get $P$ lie on $(AEF)$ $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Om245, Jan 12, 2024, 5:07 PM
Reason: image
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
lelouchvigeo
177 posts
#9
Y by
This question is basically like a lemma :D
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Z4ADies
62 posts
#10
Y by
Take $IR \cap (ABC)$ at $R$.$\angle PAF=\angle PEF=\angle PBD$ so, $PEBD$ is cyclic $\implies$ $\angle EPB=\angle EDB=\angle FPC$ so, $PFCD$ cyclic. $\angle QPD=90$, $\angle BPQ=\angle QPC$ that means $(D,Q;C,B)=-1$.Take pencil from $P$ w.r.t $(ABC)$ so, $PBNC$ is harmonic quadrilateral.Then, take pencil from $N$ w.r.t line $BD$. So, $B$ fixes $B$, $P$ fixes $Q$ , $C$ fixes $C$ and $N$ fixes $NR \cap BD$ (call it $D'$).
Thus, $(B,C;Q,D')=-1$ also $(B,C;Q,D)=-1$ and that means $D'=D$.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Z4ADies, Aug 31, 2024, 1:40 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Eka01
204 posts
#11
Y by
Let $T$ be the $A$ mixtilinear touch point. It is well known that $DN \cap \omega=T$. We prove that $\overline{T-Q-I}$. Since $(PT;BC) \stackrel{Q}{=} (N,TQ \cap \omega ;C,B)=-1$ $\implies TQ \cap  \omega =M$ where $M$ is antipode of $N$ in $\omega$. But $I$ lies on $TM$ and so the required is proved.
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by Eka01, Nov 8, 2024, 5:36 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MathLuis
1484 posts
#12
Y by
Let $T_A$ the A-mixtilinear intouch point of $\triangle ABC$, by $\sqrt{bc}$ invert we have $M,I,T_A$ colinear, where $M$ is midpoint of arc $BAC$ in $\omega$. Let $L$ midpoint of $BC$.
Claim 1: $D,P,M$ are colinear.
Proof: Note that $P$ is miquel of $BEFC$ so by homologue points we have it's miquel of $BEIL$ as well so $DPIL$ is cyclic, but clearly $DILN$ is cyclic with diameter $DN$ therefore both combined give $\angle DPN=90$ which concludes.
Finish: Note that $-1=(M, N; B, C) \overset{P}{=} (D, Q; B, C)$ and also that $DI$ is trivially tangent to $(BIC)$ from I-E Lemma, which means that in $\triangle BIC$, $IQ$ is the I-symedian but from trivial angle case we have $BN, NC$ tangent to $(BIC)$ therefore $N,I,Q,T_A$ are colinear, now projecting from $T_A$ gives $D,T_A,N$ colinear which finishes as $\angle NT_AM=90$ thus we are done :cool:.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
SimplisticFormulas
91 posts
#13 • 1 Y
Y by MathLuis
I have not done mixtilinear circles or whatever, so heres a solution based purely on angle chase:
Let $DN$ meet $\omega$ again in $L$. Let $IL$ meet $BC$ in $Q*$ and $QN$ meet $\omega$ in $P*$. We claim that $P$ and $P*$ are the same by showing that $AFEP$ is cyclic.
Note that $\angle EDB=180-\angle EBD-\angle DEB=\frac{B-C}{2}$. Also, note that

$\angle DIB=180-\angle IDB-\angle DBI= \frac{B-C}{2}$. Hence, $DB$ is tangent to $(BIC)$ at $I$.
$\implies DI^2=DB \cdot DC=DL \cdot DN$
$\implies DI$ is tangent to $(LIN)$ in $I$.
$\implies \angle DIN= \angle ILN=90$
$\implies \angle ILD=90$
Also note that
$\angle LDQ=\angle BDL=180-\angle DBL-\angle DLB=180-\angle LNC-\angle BCN=180-\angle LNI-\angle B-\angle \frac{A}{2}=\angle C+\angle \frac {A}{2}-\angle LNI=\angle BCN +\angle ACB-\angle LNI=\angle ACN-\angle LNI=\angle ALD-\angle ANL=\angle LAN=\angle LP*N=\angle LP*Q*$,
giving us the fact that $LDP*Q*$ is cyclic.
$\implies \angle NP*D=\angle Q*P*D=\angle Q*LD=90$
$\implies \angle DP*C=\angle DP*N +\angle NP*C=90+\angle NAC=90+\angle \frac{A}{2}=180-(90-\angle \frac{A}{2})=\angle DFC$
$\implies DP*FC$ is cyclic
$\implies \angle P*AC=\angle P*BA=\angle P*DF$
$\implies \angle P*DE=\angle P*BE$
$\implies EP*DB$ is cyclic
$\implies \angle P*EA=\angle P*DB=\angle P*DC=\angle P*FA$, hence $P* \in (AEF)$, as required
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TestX01
332 posts
#14
Y by
Om245 wrote:
We redefines everything :)

Let $T$ be mixtilinear Incircles touch point.Note that circle pass though $E$ and $F$

Define $Y$ be antipode of $N$ then we know $\overline{Y-I-T}$ and $\angle YTN = 90$
Let $D = NT \cap BC$ and $M$ be midpoint of $BC$. Redefine $Q = DM \cap YT$
Now note $Q$ is orthocenter of $\triangle YND$.

Redefine $P = DY \cap (ABC)$ now we get $NP \perp DY$
Now if we prove $P$ lie on $(AEF)$ we are done

[asy]
 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(12.603703365062785cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = -15.889434907857462, xmax = 42.71426845720532, ymin = -19.217449558241984, ymax = 11.666426980388458;  /* image dimensions */
pen zzttqq = rgb(0.6,0.2,0.); pen ffxfqq = rgb(1.,0.4980392156862745,0.); pen qqwuqq = rgb(0.,0.39215686274509803,0.); pen yqqqyq = rgb(0.5019607843137255,0.,0.5019607843137255); 

draw((4.676888221431007,6.213756330118006)--(1.46,-5.72)--(19.64,-5.64)--cycle, linewidth(0.8) + zzttqq); 
draw((10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023)--(-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025)--(10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327)--cycle, linewidth(0.4) + qqwuqq); 
 /* draw figures */
draw((4.676888221431007,6.213756330118006)--(1.46,-5.72), linewidth(0.8) + zzttqq); 
draw((19.64,-5.64)--(4.676888221431007,6.213756330118006), linewidth(0.8) + zzttqq); 
draw(circle((10.532773253911554,-1.7652219514006515), 9.897246280181983), linewidth(0.8) + ffxfqq); 
draw((4.676888221431007,6.213756330118006)--(7.165969753513003,-1.3285130495083106), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw(circle((6.460477994055081,0.8092268462545278), 5.69123285580188), linewidth(0.8) + red); 
draw((0.8133189006186733,0.10231412718850881)--(10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw(circle((2.166374291986518,-8.708135767461185), 8.913741427607286), linewidth(0.8) + qqwuqq); 
draw((-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025)--(10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((10.55,-5.68)--(10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023)--(4.309242492561626,-9.460879739602213), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327)--(10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw(circle((7.165969753513002,-1.3285130495083102), 4.366335898317111), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw(circle((8.244067766679159,-4.595302637608951), 6.257530700945483), linewidth(0.8) + yqqqyq); 
draw((-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025)--(10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((7.165969753513003,-1.3285130495083106)--(10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((12.12973919618593,0.3096181584070275)--(-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((0.8133189006186733,0.10231412718850881)--(7.165969753513003,-1.3285130495083106), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((0.8133189006186733,0.10231412718850881)--(10.55,-5.68), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023)--(-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025), linewidth(0.4) + qqwuqq); 
draw((-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025)--(10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327), linewidth(0.4) + qqwuqq); 
draw((10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327)--(10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023), linewidth(0.4) + qqwuqq); 
draw((-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025)--(19.64,-5.64), linewidth(0.8)); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((4.676888221431007,6.213756330118006),dotstyle); 
label("$A$", (4.2985779297551305,6.610825809810868), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1.46,-5.72),dotstyle); 
label("$B$", (0.7906097705788365,-6.561250709449108), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((19.64,-5.64),dotstyle); 
label("$C$", (19.774908043768193,-5.2887524556302585), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((7.165969753513003,-1.3285130495083106),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$I$", (7.118709194975288,-3.087674394970628), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-6.243576487131332,-5.753899126456025),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$D$", (-6.741204218240854,-4.5665237169763175), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((2.202200310840074,-2.96664425742365),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$E$", (1.1689200622547113,-2.7781477926903677), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((12.12973919618593,0.3096181584070275),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F$", (12.277485899646308,0.5922529876946916), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((0.8133189006186733,0.10231412718850881),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$P$", (-0.06918634686633351,0.4202937642056579), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((10.576325071104362,-11.662372408466327),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$N$", (11.7272163844814,-11.238541588350822), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((10.55,-5.68),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$M$", (11.7272163844814,-6.630034398844721), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((5.629779458335351,-5.701651135496874),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$Q$", (5.502292494178368,-7.214695758707435), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((4.309242492561626,-9.460879739602213),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$T$", (3.679524725194608,-10.860231296674948), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((10.489221436718749,8.131928505665023),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$Y$", (11.589649005690173,7.1610953249757765), NE * labelscalefactor); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */

[/asy]


from $\angle DPN = \angle DIN = \angle DMN = 90 \implies D,P,I,M,N$ are cyclic.
which give us $\angle IPM = \angle IDM$

Now as $I$ and $M$ are midpoint of $EF$ and $BC$ and $P$ lie on $(ABC)$
$P$ is miqual point of complete quadrilateral $BCFE$ and hence from $A = BE \cap CF$ we get $P$ lie on $(AEF)$ $\blacksquare$

i'm fanumtaxing this diagram:

Note that $D,P,Y$ collinear because $\angle DPC=\angle DFC$, $\angle CPD=\angle CNM$. This is easy to check as they are $90^\circ-\frac{\angle A}{2}$. Where we note that $DPFC$ is cyclic by Miquel.

Suppose that $IY\cap (ABC)=T'$. We claim that $D,T',N$ collinear. This is radax on $(IT'N)$, $(BIC)$, and $(ABC)$.

Now, note that $T'=T$. Note that as $PN\perp DY$, and $YT\perp DN$, and $DQ\perp YN$. Thus $Q$ also lies on $IT$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
GeorgeMetrical123
7 posts
#15
Y by
Here's a proof I haven't seen mentioned above:
We use the same notation from Om245's picture.
We invert around circle $(BIC)$., whose centre is $N$. Let $T$ be the intersection of $DN$ and $\omega$. Let $Q$ be the intersection of $PN$ with $BC$.
From there, we see that:
\begin{align}
 &BC \rightarrow \omega \\
& T \rightarrow D \\
& Q \rightarrow P \\
& B \rightarrow B \\
& I \rightarrow I\\ 
&C \rightarrow C \\
& M \rightarrow Y
\end{align}We will first prove that $D, P, Y$ are collinear.
$P$ is the Miquel point of $BEFC$, so $ DPEB$ is concyclic. From there:
\begin{align}
\angle DPB &= \angle DEB \\
&= \angle FEA \\
&= 90^\circ - \frac{1}{2}\angle BAC \\
&= \angle YCB \\
&= 180^\circ - \angle YPB
\end{align}From there, the inversion shows us that $(TQMN)$ is concyclic. Because $ \angle QTN = \angle TMN = 90^\circ$, we see that $T, Q, Y$ are collinear because $Y$ is the antipode of $N$. Now we finish by remarking that $T, I, Y$ are collinear because $\angle DIN = \angle DMN = 90^\circ$ is a cyclic quad, which the inversion sends to the required line, finishing the proof! Q.E.D.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
GeorgeMetrical123
7 posts
#16
Y by
Suppose we already have $ T, I, Q$ and $D, P, Y$ collinear following proofs from my previous post.
Let $f(X) = \pm \frac{BX}{CX} $ where the sign is positive if $X$ is strictly above $BC$.
\begin{align*}
f(T)f(Y) &= f(T) \\
&= \frac{f(D)}{f(N)} \\
&= -f(D) \\
&= -f(P)f(Y) \\
&= -f(P) \\
&= f(P)f(N) 
\end{align*}So $PN$ and $TY$ intersect on $BC$, so we are finished. Q.E.D.
I present another proof, where we do not assume $D, P, Y$ collinear.
We see that we want to prove that $f(D) = f(P)$. We also see that $f(D) = f(I)^2$. From here, we start calculation, eventually showing those two are equal.
\begin{align*}
 f(P) = f(I)^2 \\
\frac{BP}{CP} = \left( \frac{\sin \angle ICB}{\sin \angle IBC} \right) ^2 \\
\frac{BE}{CF} =  \left( \frac{\sin \angle EIB}{\sin \angle FIC} \right) ^2 \\
\frac{\sin \angle FIC ^2}{CF} = \frac{\sin \angle EIB ^2}{BE} \\
\frac{ \sin \angle FIC \sin \angle IFC}{CI} = \frac{ \sin \angle EIB \sin \angle IEB}{BI} \\
\frac{  \sin \angle FIC}{CI} = \frac{ \sin \angle EIB}{BI} \\
\frac{BI}{CI} = \frac{ \sin \angle EIB}{\sin \angle FIC} \\
\frac{BI}{CI} = \frac{\sin \angle ICB}{ \sin \angle IBC} 
\end{align*}which is obviously true by sine theorem! Q.E.D.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a