We have your learning goals covered with Spring and Summer courses available. Enroll today!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a March Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Mar 2, 2025
March is the month for State MATHCOUNTS competitions! Kudos to everyone who participated in their local chapter competitions and best of luck to all going to State! Join us on March 11th for a Math Jam devoted to our favorite Chapter competition problems! Are you interested in training for MATHCOUNTS? Be sure to check out our AMC 8/MATHCOUNTS Basics and Advanced courses.

Are you ready to level up with Olympiad training? Registration is open with early bird pricing available for our WOOT programs: MathWOOT (Levels 1 and 2), CodeWOOT, PhysicsWOOT, and ChemWOOT. What is WOOT? WOOT stands for Worldwide Online Olympiad Training and is a 7-month high school math Olympiad preparation and testing program that brings together many of the best students from around the world to learn Olympiad problem solving skills. Classes begin in September!

Do you have plans this summer? There are so many options to fit your schedule and goals whether attending a summer camp or taking online classes, it can be a great break from the routine of the school year. Check out our summer courses at AoPS Online, or if you want a math or language arts class that doesn’t have homework, but is an enriching summer experience, our AoPS Virtual Campus summer camps may be just the ticket! We are expanding our locations for our AoPS Academies across the country with 15 locations so far and new campuses opening in Saratoga CA, Johns Creek GA, and the Upper West Side NY. Check out this page for summer camp information.

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]March 5th (Wednesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, HCSSiM Math Jam 2025. Amber Verser, Assistant Director of the Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics, will host an information session about HCSSiM, a summer program for high school students.
[*]March 6th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar on Math Competitions from elementary through high school. Join us for an enlightening session that demystifies the world of math competitions and helps you make informed decisions about your contest journey.
[*]March 11th (Tuesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS Chapter Discussion MATH JAM. AoPS instructors will discuss some of their favorite problems from the MATHCOUNTS Chapter Competition. All are welcome!
[*]March 13th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar about Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus. Transform your summer into an unforgettable learning adventure! From elementary through high school, we offer dynamic summer camps featuring topics in mathematics, language arts, and competition preparation - all designed to fit your schedule and ignite your passion for learning.[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Friday, Mar 28 - Jul 18
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Jul 8
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21


Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jul 20
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 16 - Jun 8
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Monday, Mar 17 - Jun 9
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Tuesday, Mar 4 - Aug 12
Sunday, Mar 23 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Mar 16 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 23 - Aug 3
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Sunday, Mar 16 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Wednesday, Mar 5 - May 21
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Sunday, Mar 30 - Oct 5
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jun 15
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Tuesday, Mar 4 - May 20
Monday, Mar 31 - Jun 23
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Monday, Mar 24 - Jun 16
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Sunday, Mar 30 - Jun 22
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Mar 2, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
2 var inquality
sqing   0
2 minutes ago
Source: Own
Let $ a,b $ be nonnegative real numbers such that $ a^2+ab+b^2+a+b=1. $ Prove that
$$  (ab+1)(a+b)\leq \frac{ 20}{27}  $$$$ (ab+1)(a+b-1)\leq  - \frac{ 10}{27}  $$Let $ a,b $ be nonnegative real numbers such that $ a^2+b^2+a+b=1. $ Prove that
$$  (ab+1)(a+b)\leq \frac{ 5\sqrt 3-7}{2}  $$$$ (ab+1)(a+b-1)\leq 3\sqrt 3- \frac{ 11}{2}  $$
0 replies
sqing
2 minutes ago
0 replies
Thanks u!
Ruji2018252   0
9 minutes ago
Find all f: R->R and
\[2^{xy}f(xy-1)+2^{x+y+1}f(x)f(y)=4xy-2,\forall x,y\in\mathbb{R}\]
0 replies
Ruji2018252
9 minutes ago
0 replies
Inequality with x, y
bel.jad5   6
N 14 minutes ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let x and y positive real numbers such that: $x^2+y^2+xy=3$. Find the maximum of $x^2y$
6 replies
+1 w
bel.jad5
Sep 18, 2016
sqing
14 minutes ago
An inequality
JK1603JK   2
N 16 minutes ago by JK1603JK
Source: unknown
Let a,b,c>=0: ab+bc+ca=3 then maximize P=\frac{a^2b+b^2c+c^2a+9}{a+b+c}+\frac{abc}{2}.
2 replies
JK1603JK
5 hours ago
JK1603JK
16 minutes ago
Time to bring it on!
giangtruong13   0
27 minutes ago
Source: New probs
Prove that the equation $$x^2+y^2-z^2+2=xyz$$has no integer solutions
0 replies
giangtruong13
27 minutes ago
0 replies
JBMO Shortlist 2020 N4
Lukaluce   5
N 29 minutes ago by MITDragon
Source: JBMO Shortlist 2020
Find all prime numbers $p$ such that

$(x + y)^{19} - x^{19} - y^{19}$

is a multiple of $p$ for any positive integers $x$, $y$.
5 replies
Lukaluce
Jul 4, 2021
MITDragon
29 minutes ago
Inspired by JK1603JK
sqing   1
N 44 minutes ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $ a,b\geq 0 $ and $ a^2+ab+b^2+a+b=5. $ Prove that
$$\frac{ (a+b)(ab+1)}{a+b+1} \leq \frac{4}{3}$$$$ \frac{(a+b)(ab+1)}{a+b+ab-1}\leq \frac{9+\sqrt{21}}{6}$$$$\frac{a^2b+b^2+a }{a+b } \leq \frac{\sqrt{21}-1}{2}$$$$\frac{a^2b+b^2+a+b}{a+b+1} \leq \frac{\sqrt{21}-1}{2}$$
1 reply
sqing
an hour ago
sqing
44 minutes ago
Abelkonkurransen 2025 3a
Lil_flip38   4
N an hour ago by Lil_flip38
Source: abelkonkurransen
Let \(ABC\) be a triangle. Let \(E,F\) be the feet of the altitudes from \(B,C\) respectively. Let \(P,Q\) be the projections of \(B,C\) onto line \(EF\). Show that \(PE=QF\).
4 replies
1 viewing
Lil_flip38
4 hours ago
Lil_flip38
an hour ago
postaffteff
JetFire008   15
N an hour ago by JetFire008
Source: Internet
Let $P$ be the Fermat point of a $\triangle ABC$. Prove that the Euler line of the triangles $PAB$, $PBC$, $PCA$ are concurrent and the point of concurrence is $G$, the centroid of $\triangle ABC$.
15 replies
JetFire008
Mar 15, 2025
JetFire008
an hour ago
MTRP Subjective P2.2(Seniors)
sanyalarnab   1
N an hour ago by anudeep
Source: Paper
In the planet of MTRPia, one alien named Bob wants to build roads across all the cities all over the planet. The alien government has imposed the condition that this construction must be carried out in such a way so that one can go from one city to any other city through the network of roads thus constructed. To have consistency in the whole process, Bob decides to have an even number of lords originating from each city. Prove that starting from an arbitrary city one can traverse the whole network of roads without ever traversing the same road twice.
1 reply
sanyalarnab
Mar 20, 2024
anudeep
an hour ago
(x-2y)/y + (2y-4)/x + 4/xy = 0 and 1/x + 1/y+ 1/z =2
parmenides51   2
N an hour ago by ali123456
Source: Greece JBMO TST 2010 p2
Find all real $x,y,z$ such that $\frac{x-2y}{y}+\frac{2y-4}{x}+\frac{4}{xy}=0$ and $\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z}=2$.
2 replies
parmenides51
Apr 29, 2019
ali123456
an hour ago
Forgotten number theory
giangtruong13   0
an hour ago
Source: Forgotten forum
Solve in $\mathbb{N}$ \[ x^3+y^3+z^3=4^n\cdot{n^3} \]
0 replies
giangtruong13
an hour ago
0 replies
if a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2=4 and a,b,c,d > 0 prove 2 of a,b,c,d have sum <=2
parmenides51   12
N an hour ago by ali123456
Source: Greece JBMO TST 2018 p1
Let $a,b,c,d$ be positive real numbers such that $a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2=4$.
Prove that exist two of $a,b,c,d$ with sum less or equal to $2$.
12 replies
parmenides51
Apr 28, 2019
ali123456
an hour ago
Cool NT with Sets and Mod
pear333   1
N 2 hours ago by pear333
Find all integers $a$ such that there exists a set $X$ of $6$ integers satisfying the following condition: for each $k = 1,2,...,36$, there exist $x, y \in X$ such that $ax+y-k$ is divisible by $37$.
1 reply
pear333
Yesterday at 8:18 AM
pear333
2 hours ago
Arithmetic Sequence of Products
GrantStar   18
N Mar 17, 2025 by hgomamogh
Source: IMO Shortlist 2023 N4
Let $a_1, \dots, a_n, b_1, \dots, b_n$ be $2n$ positive integers such that the $n+1$ products
\[a_1 a_2 a_3 \cdots a_n, b_1 a_2 a_3 \cdots a_n, b_1 b_2 a_3 \cdots a_n, \dots, b_1 b_2 b_3 \cdots b_n\]form a strictly increasing arithmetic progression in that order. Determine the smallest possible integer that could be the common difference of such an arithmetic progression.
18 replies
GrantStar
Jul 17, 2024
hgomamogh
Mar 17, 2025
Arithmetic Sequence of Products
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: IMO Shortlist 2023 N4
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
GrantStar
813 posts
#1 • 6 Y
Y by OronSH, peace09, Tqhoud, BorivojeGuzic123, iamnotgentle, NO_SQUARES
Let $a_1, \dots, a_n, b_1, \dots, b_n$ be $2n$ positive integers such that the $n+1$ products
\[a_1 a_2 a_3 \cdots a_n, b_1 a_2 a_3 \cdots a_n, b_1 b_2 a_3 \cdots a_n, \dots, b_1 b_2 b_3 \cdots b_n\]form a strictly increasing arithmetic progression in that order. Determine the smallest possible integer that could be the common difference of such an arithmetic progression.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by GrantStar, Sep 15, 2024, 7:55 PM
Reason: Extra comma
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
GrantStar
813 posts
#2 • 2 Y
Y by peace09, Tqhoud
Solution
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by GrantStar, Jul 17, 2024, 12:05 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MarkBcc168
1593 posts
#3 • 1 Y
Y by peace09
We claim the smallest possible common difference is $n!$. This is achievable with $a_i=i$ and $b_i=i+1$.

Without loss of generality, let $\gcd(a_i,b_i)=1$. Otherwise, we can divide both $a_i$ and $b_i$ by their gcd.

Next, let the arithmetic progression by $x, x+y, \dots, x+ny$. Then, by dividing adjacent terms, we get that
$$\frac{a_i}{b_i} = \frac{x+(i-1)y}{x+iy}.$$However, since $\gcd(a_i,b_i)=1$, we get that $x+(i-1)y\mid a_i$, so in fact, $a_i\geq x+(i-1)y\geq i$. Finally, we have
$$y=(b_1-a_1)\prod_{i=2}^na_i\geq 1\prod_{i=2}^n i=n!,$$as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Marinchoo
407 posts
#4 • 1 Y
Y by Tqhoud
Let the common difference be $d_n$. We'll prove that $d_n \geq n!$ (equality occurs if $a_i=i$ and $b_i = i+1$) and $B_n = \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} b_i \geq (n+1)!$ by induction. The base case $n=1$ is trivial and for the induction step from $n$ to $n+1$, note that the numbers $a_1a_2\ldots a_n$, $b_1a_2\ldots a_n$, $\ldots, b_1b_2\ldots b_n$ form an arithmetic progression because the numbers $a_1a_2\ldots a_na_{n+1}, b_1a_2\ldots a_na_{n+1}, \ldots, b_1b_2\ldots b_na_{n+1}$ do. Hence, by the induction hypothesis,
\[d_{n+1} = d_na_{n+1} = B_n(b_{n+1}-a_{n+1}).\]However, $B_n$ is the $n$-th term in the arithmetic progression $a_1a_2\ldots a_n, b_1a_2\ldots a_n, \ldots, B_n$, so $B_n>nd_n$. From here,
\[a_{n+1} = \frac{B_n}{d_n}(b_{n+1}-a_{n+1})>n(b_{n+1}-a_{n+1})\geq n.\]Therefore $d_{n+1} = d_na_{n+1} \geq d_n (n+1) \geq (n+1)!$ by the induction hypothesis. To conclude, $b_{n+1} > a_{n+1} \geq n+1$, so we have that $B_{n+1}\geq b_{n+1}(n+1)!\geq (n+2)!$ and the induction step is complete.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Bacteria
256 posts
#5 • 4 Y
Y by khina, plagueis, Supertinito, InCtrl
This problem was proposed by Matthew Brennan (SnowEverywhere), Canada.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
dkedu
179 posts
#6 • 1 Y
Y by Tqhoud
We claim the answer is $n!$, achievable with $a_i = i, b_i = i+1$. Let $r_i = \frac {b_i}{a_i}$. We can deduce that
\[(r_i - 1)r_{i-1} = r_{i-1} - 1 \implies r_i = \frac{2r_{i-1} - 1}{r_{i-1}}\]We let $a_1 = a, b_1 = b$ and get that
\[r_i = \frac{ib - (i-1)a}{(i-1)b - (i-2)a}\text{ when } i \ge 2\]So the difference is at least
\begin{align*}
    &\left(\frac{b}{a} - 1\right)(a)(2b-a)(3b-2a)\cdots ((n-1)b - (n-2)a) \\
    &= (b-a)(2b - a) \cdots ((n-1)b - (n-2)a) \\ 
    &\ge 1 \cdot 2 \cdots n = n!
    \end{align*}since $b-a \ge 1$ and $ib - (i-1)a \ge (i-1)(b-a) + b = i + 1$ since $b > a \ge 1$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Tqhoud
26 posts
#7
Y by
We see that the common difference is

$$r=(b_i - a_i ) b_1b_2\dots b_{i-1} a_{i+1} \dots a_n  $$
and we want smaller number can take it $r$

where $i$ is any positive integer and $n \ge i$

We see that if

$$b_1b_2\dots b_{i-1}a_i\dots a_n,b_1b_2\dots b_{i}a_{i+1}\dots a_n ,b_1b_2\dots b_{i+1}a_{i+2}\dots a_n$$
are consecutive numbers in arithmetic sequence equal to

$$ b_1b_2\dots b_{i-1}a_i\dots a_n + b_1b_2\dots b_{i+1}a_{i+2}\dots a_n = 2(b_1b_2\dots b_{i}a_{i+1}\dots a_n)$$
$$b_ib_{i+1}+a_ia_{i+1}=2(b_{i}a_{i+1})$$
$$\frac{a_i}{b_i} + \frac{b_{i+1}}{a_{i+1}}= 2 $$
We see that $gcd(a_i,b_i)=k$ where $k$ is any positive integer doesn't effect in this relation but we know that $b_i-a_i|r$
and we want smaller number $r$ so we can check that $gcd(a_i,b_i)=1$ where $i$ is a positive integer and $n \ge i$

from $b_ib_{i+1}+a_ia_{i+1}=2(b_{i}a_{i+1})$ we can see that

$a_{i+1}|b_ib_{i+1} $ so $a_{i+1}|b_i$ and $b_i|a_ia_{i+1}$ so $ b_i|a_{i+1}$ so $b_i=a_{i+1}$

We get that

$$a_{i+1}a_{i+2}+a_ia_{i+1}=2(a_{i+1})^2$$
$$a_{i+2}+a_i=2a_{i+1}, a_{i+2}-a_{i+1}=a_{i+1}-a_{i}=c$$
$$a_{i}=(n-1)c+a_{1}$$
$$r=(a_{i+1}-a_{i})a_2a_3\dots a_n=1(c+a_1)(2c+a_1)\dots ((n-1)c+a_1) \ge 1(2)(3)\dots (n)=n!$$
so $r\ge n!$ and if we let

$$a_i=i,b_i=i+1$$
we see is a solution and $r=n!$ and we are done
This post has been edited 5 times. Last edited by Tqhoud, Jul 18, 2024, 8:36 AM
Reason: .
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
VicKmath7
1385 posts
#8
Y by
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
trk08
614 posts
#9
Y by
We claim the answer is $n!$ which can be achieved by $a_i=i$ and $b_i=i+1$. We now show it is the smallest.

Note that in order to be an arithmetic sequence:
\[\frac{a_1a_2+b_1b_2}{2}=b_1a_2\]\[\frac{a_1a_2+b_1b_2}{2}=b_1a_2\]\[\dots\]\[\frac{a_{n-1}a_n+b_{n-1}b_n}{2}=b_{n-1}a_n.\]Thus:
\[a_ia_{i+1}+b_ib_{i+1}=2b_ia_{i+1}\]\[\iff b_{i+1}-a_{i+1}=\frac{a_{i+1}}{b_i}(b_i-a_i).\]If we let $b_1-a_1=k$, then:
\[b_1-a_1=k\]\[b_2-a_2=\frac{k}{b_1}\cdot a_2\]\[\dots\]\[b_n-a_n=\frac{k}{b_1}\cdot\frac{a_2}{b_2}\dots\frac{a_{n-1}}{b_{n-1}}\cdot a_n.\]As a result:
\[D=k\cdot a_n\cdot a_{n-1}\dots a_3\cdot a_2.\]

Let:
\[f(i)=\frac{b_1}{k}\cdot\frac{b_2}{a_2}\dots\frac{b_{i}}{a_{i}}.\]Note:
\[b_i-a_i=\frac{1}{f(i-1)}\cdot a_i\]\[\iff \frac{b_i}{a_i}-1=\frac{1}{f(i-1)}\]\[\iff f(i)=f(i-1)+1.\]Also:
\[b_i-a_i\geq 1\]\[\implies a_i\geq f(i-1).\]

Thus:
\[f(1)=\frac{b_1}{k}>1\]\[\implies f(1)\geq 2\]\[\implies f(i)\geq i+1\]\[\implies a_i\geq f(i-1)\geq i\]\[\implies D\geq k\cdot n!\geq n!\]as desired $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Krish230905
109 posts
#10
Y by
Note that scaling all the terms of an arithmetic progression doesn't change the fact that it is an arithmetic progression. With that in mind, scale the given arithmetic progression such that the first term is $1$, and the common difference $d=\frac{s}{t}$ for some $s,t \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $(s,t)=1$. Hence the arithmetic progression becomes, $$1, \frac{t+s}{t},\frac{t+2s}{t}, \cdots,\frac{t+ns}{t+(n-1)s}$$with $\frac{b_i}{a_i}=\frac{t+is}{t+(i-1)s}$ (Here, note that $(t+is,t+(i-1)s)=1$ because $(s,t)=1$)
Now, note that all the terms of the arithmetic progression are integers. This forces that $a_i \ge t+(i-1)s$. Thus, $a_1 \cdots a_n \ge \prod_{i=1}^n (t+(i-1)s)$. In the equality case, the common difference becomes, $$\prod_{i=0}^{n-1}(s+it) \ge n!$$With equality when $s=t=1$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Krish230905, Jul 23, 2024, 9:39 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sami1618
874 posts
#11
Y by
The answer is $n!$ which is achieved when $a_i=i$ and $b_i=i+1$ for all $1\leq i \leq n$. Choose positive integers $a$ and $d$ such that the arithmetic progression is $a,a+d,\dots, a+nd$. Let $g=\gcd(a,d)$, $a=ga'$, and $d=gd'$. Then by dividing consecutive terms, $\frac{b_i}{a_i}=\frac{a+id}{a+(i-1)d}$ thus $(a'+(i-1)d')|a_i$. Multiplying cyclically and dividing out by $a'$ gives that $$(a'+d)(a'+2d)\dots (a'+(n-1)d')|g$$Thus we have that $n!\leq g|d$, as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TheStrayCat
161 posts
#12
Y by
By rewriting the definition for the original arithmetic progression we notice that $\{\frac{a_i}{b_i-a_i}, 1 \le i \le n\}$ is an arithmetic progression with difference 1. Hence, for each $1 \le i \le n$, $a_i$ > $(b_i-a_i)(i-1)$, which implies $a_i \ge i$. Then the difference is $(b_1-a_1)a_2a_3 \ldots a_n \ge 1 \cdot 2 \cdot 3 \cdot \ldots \cdot n = n!$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cj13609517288
1868 posts
#13 • 2 Y
Y by OronSH, GrantStar
The answer is $\boxed{n!}$, with construction $a_k=k$ and $b_k=k+1$. Clearly this works.

Let $x$ be the first term, and let $y$ be the common difference. Let $d=\gcd(x,y)$, and let $x=ds$, $y=dt$. Now note that
\[\frac{b_k}{a_k}=\frac{x+ky}{x+(k-1)y}=\frac{s+kt}{s+(k-1)t}.\]Note that this is a reduced fraction because $\gcd(s+kt,s+(k-1)t)=\gcd(s+kt,t)=\gcd(s,t)=1$. Therefore,
\[x=a_1a_2\dots a_n\ge (s)(s+t)(s+2t)\dots (s+(n-1)t),\]so
\[d\ge (s+t)(s+2t)\dots (s+(n-1)t)\ge (1+1)(1+2)\dots (1+(n-1))=n!,\]so $y=dt\ge d\ge n!$. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by cj13609517288, Aug 17, 2024, 11:19 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
SomeonesPenguin
123 posts
#14
Y by
The answer is $n!$ which is achieved for $a_i=i$ and $b_i=i+1$.

First of all, it's easy to see that $b_i\ge a_i+1$ for all $i$. Notice that since the sequence is an arithmetic progression, the term with $k$ $b$'s plus the term with $k+2$ $b$'s is equal to twice the term with $k+1$ $b$'s. After dividing by the common terms this yields \[a_ka_{k+1}+b_kb_{k+1}=2b_ka_{k+1}\iff \frac{b_k}{b_k-a_k}=\frac{a_{k+1}}{b_{k+1}-a_{k+1}}\]Now let $c_k=\frac{a_k}{b_k-a_k}$. We have that \[c_k=c_1+k-1, \ \forall k\]And since $c_1>0$ We get $\frac{a_k}{b_k-a_k}> k-1$ and this implies that $a_k>k-1$, or $a_k\ge k$. Finally, note that the common difference is \[(b_1-a_1)a_2\ldots a_n\ge n!\]And this completes the proof. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
UglyScientist
38 posts
#15
Y by
MarkBcc168 wrote:
We claim the smallest possible common difference is $n!$. This is achievable with $a_i=i$ and $b_i=i+1$.

Without loss of generality, let $\gcd(a_i,b_i)=1$. Otherwise, we can divide both $a_i$ and $b_i$ by their gcd.

Next, let the arithmetic progression by $x, x+y, \dots, x+ny$. Then, by dividing adjacent terms, we get that
$$\frac{a_i}{b_i} = \frac{x+(i-1)y}{x+iy}.$$However, since $\gcd(a_i,b_i)=1$, we get that $x+(i-1)y\mid a_i$, so in fact, $a_i\geq x+(i-1)y\geq i$. Finally, we have
$$y=(b_1-a_1)\prod_{i=2}^na_i\geq 1\prod_{i=2}^n i=n!,$$as desired.

Sorry but, shouldn't it be $a_i | x+(i-1)y$?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8854 posts
#16
Y by
The smallest possible difference is $n!$. We will show the bound and give a construction simultaneously.

Let $d$ be the common difference. Notice that \[a_2a_3 \cdots a_n(b_1-a_1) = d = b_1a_3\cdots a_n(b_2-a_2)\]so $\frac{b_1-a_1}{b_2 - a_2} = \frac{b_1}{a_2}$. Similar equations hold for each index $i$. Letting $c_i = b_i - a_i$ for each $1 \leq i \leq n$ (noting that $c_i > 0$), the equations rewrite as $\frac{c_i}{c_i+a_i} = \frac{c_{i+1}}{a_{i+1}}$ for each $i$.

Now let $d_i = \gcd(a_i, c_i)$ and $a_i = d_ix_i$, $c_i = d_i z_i$ for each $i$, with $x_i$ and $z_i$ relatively prime. Then $\frac{z_i}{x_i+z_i} = \frac{z_{i+1}}{x_{i+1}}$ for each $i$, which implies that $z_i = z_{i+1} = z$ for some $z$ and $x_i = x_i + z_i = x_1 + (i-1)z$. In particular, \[d = a_2a_3\cdots a_n c_1 = d_1d_2\cdots d_n \prod_{i=2}^n (x_1 + (i-1)z).\]The values $x_1 + (i-1)z$ are positive and distinct for each $i$, hence they multiply to at least $n!$. Equality holds when $x_1 = 0$ and $z = 1$, with all the $d_i$ equal to $1$.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by HamstPan38825, Dec 16, 2024, 4:02 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mikestro
69 posts
#17 • 1 Y
Y by alexanderhamilton124
https://youtu.be/Jne2UJVpFps
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ilikeminecraft
300 posts
#18
Y by
The answer is $n!,$ constructed by $a_i = i, b_{i} = i + 1.$
Note that we can subtract and divide by the required terms. We get $a_{i + 1}(b_i - a_i) = b_i(b_{i + 1}- a_{i + 1}).$
Furthermore, note that if $g = (a_i, b_i) > 1,$ then by dividing $a_i, b_i$ both by $g,$ it still forms an arithmetic sequence, but with smaller common difference. Thus, we assume $(a_i, b_i) = 1.$
Now, recall that $a_{i + 1}(b_i - a_i) = b_i(b_{i + 1} - a_{i + 1}).$ Dividing by $a_{i + 1}b_i, $ we get $\frac{a_i}{b_i} + \frac{b_{i+1}}{a_{i + 1}} = 2.$ However, since $(a_n,b_n) = 1,$ we get $b_i = a_{i + 1}.$ Thus, $a_{i} + b_{i + 1} = 2a_{i + 1}.$ Rearranging, $a_i + a_{i + 2} = 2a_{i + 1}.$ This forms an arithmetic sequence, and it is obvious our minimum is what we stated earlier.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
hgomamogh
34 posts
#19
Y by
The answer is $n!$, with the construction $a_i = i$ and $b_i = i + 1$. We now show that $n!$ is the minimum possible common difference.

Let $\frac{b_1}{a_1} = \frac{x + y}{x}$ for some relatively prime positive integers $x$ and $y$. We see that $\frac{b_i}{a_i} = \frac{x + iy}{x + (i - 1)y}$. The numerator and denominator of this fraction are both clearly relatively prime, and therefore $a_i \geq x + (i - 1)y$.

We now compute the common difference of our sequence, which is \begin{align*}
(b_1 - a_1)a_2a_3\dots a_n.
\end{align*}
Because $b_1 - a_1 \geq y$, this is clearly bounded by \begin{align*}
y\prod_{i = 1}^{n - 1} (x + iy).
\end{align*}
Obviously, when $x$ and $y$ are minimized, this product is minimized. Hence, the minimum possible value of this expression occurs when $x = y = 1$, in which case the product is $n!$.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a