Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
Is it possible that it is not a polynomial
ItzsleepyXD   1
N a few seconds ago by E50
Source: IDK. Original?
Is it possible that there exist $f: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$ such that
$(1)$ $f$ is not a polynomial .
$(2)$ for all $m \neq n \in  \mathbb{N}$ , $m-n \mid f(m)-f(n)$ .
1 reply
1 viewing
ItzsleepyXD
24 minutes ago
E50
a few seconds ago
Geometry
B1t   2
N 19 minutes ago by B1t
Source: Mongolian TST P3
Let $ABC$ be an acute triangle with $AB \neq AC$ and orthocenter $H$. Let $B'$ and $C'$ be the feet of the altitudes from $B$ and $C$ onto sides $AC$ and $AB$, respectively. Let $M$ be the midpoint of $BC$, and $M'$ be the midpoint of $B'C'$. Let the perpendicular line through $H$ to $AM$ meet $AM$ at $S$ and $BC$ at $T$. The line $MM'$ meets $AC$ at $U$ and $AB$ at $V$. Let $P$ be the second intersection point (different from $M$) of the circumcircles of triangles $BMV$ and $CMU$. Prove that the points $T$, $P$, $M'$, $S$, and $M$ lie on the same circle.
2 replies
B1t
30 minutes ago
B1t
19 minutes ago
Easy Functional Inequality Problem in Taiwan TST
chengbilly   0
28 minutes ago
Source: 2025 Taiwan TST Round 3 Mock P4
Let $a$ be a positive real number. Find all functions $f: \mathbb{R}^+ \to \mathbb{R}^+$ such that $af(x) - f(y) + y > 0$ and
\[
    f(af(x) - f(y) + y) \leq x + f(y) - y, \quad \forall x, y \in \mathbb{R}^+.
    \]
proposed by chengbilly
0 replies
chengbilly
28 minutes ago
0 replies
easy functional
B1t   4
N 29 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: Mongolian TST 2025 P1.
Denote the set of real numbers by $\mathbb{R}$. Find all functions $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ such that for all $x, y, z \in \mathbb{R}$,
\[
f(xf(x+y)+z) = f(z) + f(x)y + f(xf(x)).
\]
4 replies
B1t
an hour ago
Ilikeminecraft
29 minutes ago
No more topics!
2ab+1 | a^2 + b^2 + 1
goldeneagle   23
N Apr 13, 2025 by Pseudo_Matter
Source: Iran 3rd round 2013 - Number Theory Exam - Problem 2
Suppose that $a,b$ are two odd positive integers such that $2ab+1 \mid a^2 + b^2 + 1$. Prove that $a=b$.
(15 points)
23 replies
goldeneagle
Sep 11, 2013
Pseudo_Matter
Apr 13, 2025
2ab+1 | a^2 + b^2 + 1
G H J
Source: Iran 3rd round 2013 - Number Theory Exam - Problem 2
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
goldeneagle
240 posts
#1 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, GeoKing, Spiritpalm
Suppose that $a,b$ are two odd positive integers such that $2ab+1 \mid a^2 + b^2 + 1$. Prove that $a=b$.
(15 points)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
odnerpmocon
455 posts
#2 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, Sadigly
Vieta jumping kills it. There might exist less OP methods to solve it, though.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
shinichiman
3212 posts
#3 • 5 Y
Y by tensor, SohamSchwarz119, XbenX, Adventure10, Mango247
goldeneagle wrote:
Suppose that $a,b$ are two odd positive integers such that $2ab+1 \mid a^2 + b^2 + 1$. Prove that $a=b$.
(15 points)
Let $\frac{a^2+b^2+1}{2ab+1}=k$ with $k \in \mathbb{N}^*$. Hence $a^2+b^2-2abk+1-k=0 \qquad (1)$.
Let $(a_0,b_0)$ be the root such that $a_0+b_0$ is minimum. Without loss of generality, assume that $a_0 \le b_0$.
Considering the equation \[x^2-2a_0k \cdot x+a_0^2-k+1=0\]
It follows that $b_0$ is a solution of the equation. Let $b_1$ be the other solution. Since $(a_0,b_1)$ is also a root of the equation $(1)$ then $a_0+b_0 \le a_0+b_1$ implies $b_0 \le b_1$. By Vieta theorem we have $\begin{cases} b_0+b_1= 2a_0k \\ b_0 \cdot b_1= a_0^2-k+1 \end{cases}$.

$\blacktriangleright$ Case 1. If $a_0=b_0$ then $k= \frac{2a_0^2+1}{2a_0^2+1}=1$. Hence $a^2+b^2+1=2ab$ implies $a=b$.
$\blacktriangleright$ Case 2. If $b_1=b_0$ then $b_0^2=a_0^2-k+1$ or $\left( a_0-b_0\right) \left( a_0+b_0 \right)=1-k$. Since $k \in \mathbb{N}^*$ then $a_0=b_0$. Thus, $a=b$.
$\blacktriangleright$ Case 3. If $a_0<b_0<b_1$ then $b_0 \ge a_0+1$ and $b_1 \ge a_0+2$. It follows that \[a_0^2-k+1=b_0 \cdot b_1 \ge \left( a_0+1 \right) \left( a_0+2 \right) \Rightarrow 1-k \ge 3a_0+2,\] a contradiction since $3a_0+2 \ge 2 >1-k$.
Thus, $\boxed{a=b}$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mathuz
1518 posts
#4 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, and 1 other user
my solution is by Vieta Jumping too! :)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
lawsy
7 posts
#5 • 3 Y
Y by Giovanni98, Adventure10, animath_314159
shinichiman wrote:
then $a_0+b_0 \le a_0+b_1$
I think you are wrong, because $ b_1 $ might be negative and it wouldn't be a solution in positive integers. Also we have to use the fact that $ a $ and $ b $ are odd because otherwise the statement is not true (for example, $ (a,b)=(2,20) $).
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mavropnevma
15142 posts
#6 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10 and 1 other user
Let $\dfrac{a^2+b^2+1}{2ab+1}=k$ with $k \in \mathbb{N}^*$, hence $a^2+b^2-2abk+1-k=0$.
Assume $(a,b)$ to be a solution in positive integers with $a\neq b$. Denote $\alpha = \min\{a,b\}$, $\beta = \max\{a,b\}$. Thus $(\alpha,\beta)$ is a solution, with $\alpha < \beta$.
Considering the equation \[x^2-2\alpha kx+\alpha^2-k+1=0,\]
it follows that $\beta$ is a solution of the equation. Let $\gamma$ be the other solution. By the Vieta relations we have $\begin{cases} \beta +\gamma = 2\alpha k \\ \beta\gamma = \alpha^2-k+1 \end{cases}$.
Thus $\gamma = 2\alpha k-\beta$ is integer. But then we have $0 < \gamma^2 + \alpha^2 + 1 = k(2\alpha\gamma+1)$, so we must have $\gamma\geq 0$ (if $\gamma\leq -1$ we would have $k(2\alpha\gamma +1) \leq k(-2\alpha+1) < 0$). When $\beta$ is odd it follows $\gamma$ is also odd, thus $\gamma=0$ is impossible, so $\gamma>0$. Finally, since then $0< \beta\gamma = \alpha^2-k+1 \leq \alpha^2$ and $\beta >\alpha$, it follows $\gamma < \alpha$.
By the method of Vieta jumping (in fact a case of the infinite descent method), we can now repeat the above, with $(\alpha', \beta') = (\gamma, \alpha)$ (when $\alpha$ is also odd, since already $\gamma$ has been proved odd, and so this parity perpetuates), and this leads to a typical contradiction. Notice that for $a=b$ we have $\dfrac{a^2+b^2+1}{2ab+1} = 1$, an identity alwys true.

Thus the problem with the proof proposed above is not in the fact that $b_1$ might be negative (which was shown to be impossible since my $\gamma$ plays the role of the $b_1$), but in not using the parity of the integers involved, and also in only providing a result for the minimal solution $(a_0,b_0)$, showing that it forces $a_0=b_0$, but leaving open a possibility with $a<b$ and $(a,b)$ not minimal.

For good measure let us also analyse what happens if $a,b$ might be even. Everything works the same, up to the point where we could have $\gamma = 0$. That would force $\alpha^2 = k-1$, so $k=\alpha^2+1$, with an initial solution $(a_0,b_0) = (0,\alpha)$ which is unacceptable, since containing $0$, but which generates the infinite family of solutions $(a_n,b_n)\mapsto (a_{n+1},b_{n+1})$ via $a_{n+1} = b_n$, $b_{n+1} = 2kb_n - a_n$ for all $n\geq 0$. Thus the problem only has solutions $a\neq b$ when $k$ is one more than a perfect square (and then one of $a,b$ or both are even). For example

$\bullet$ for $\alpha=1$ we have $k=2$ and solutions $(0,1)\mapsto (1,4)\mapsto (4,15) \mapsto \cdots$

$\bullet$ for $\alpha=2$ we have $k=5$ and solutions $(0,2)\mapsto (2,20)\mapsto (20,198) \mapsto \cdots$, which is the example given in the previous post.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
shinichiman
3212 posts
#7 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
$a,b$ is two odd positive integers ??
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mavropnevma
15142 posts
#8 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, and 1 other user
My solution takes care of all parity cases, if you just read it carefully.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
shinichiman
3212 posts
#9 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
lawsy wrote:
shinichiman wrote:
then $a_0+b_0 \le a_0+b_1$
I think you are wrong, because $ b_1 $ might be negative and it wouldn't be a solution in positive integers. Also we have to use the fact that $ a $ and $ b $ are odd because otherwise the statement is not true (for example, $ (a,b)=(2,20) $).
I still don't understand why $b_1$ might be negative. Could you please explain to me ?? Thank you very much.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mavropnevma
15142 posts
#10 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10 and 1 other user
Oh, please, read the above posts. I already dealt with this issue, proving that it cannot be negative.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sayantanchakraborty
505 posts
#11 • 4 Y
Y by Kameawtamprooz, Adventure10, Mango247, Captainscrubz
Note that $2ab+1 \mid a^2+b^2+1 \Rightarrow 2ab+1 \mid (a-b)^2$.

We now consider the positive integer solution set $(a,b)$ to the equation $\frac{(a-b)^2}{2ab+1}=k$ where $k$ is a fixed positive integer.
Let $(a_0,b_0)$ be a solution for which the sum is minimal over all elements of the solution set.Without loss of generality let $a_0>b_0$.Now we consider another equation
$\frac{(x-b_0)^2}{2xb_0+1}=k \Leftrightarrow x^2-2xb_0(k+1)+{b_0}^2-k=0$.

Obviously one of the roots is $a_0$.The other root ${\alpha}_0=2b_0(k+1)-a_0$ is a positive integer.We can also say that ${\alpha}_0=\frac{{b_0}^2-k}{a_0}$.But

$\frac{{b_0}^2-k}{a_0}<\frac{{b_0}^2}{a_0}<a_0 \Rightarrow a_0+b_0>a_0+{\alpha}_0$

a contradiction to our assumption.Thus $k=0$ and we are done.(Note that $k$ can't be negative).

Is there no combinatorics exam??
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mogmog8
1080 posts
#13 • 1 Y
Y by centslordm
Let $(a,b)$ be the solution such that $a\neq b$ and $a+b$ is minimized; WLOG $a>b.$ Setting $\frac{a^2+b^2+1}{2ab+1}=k,$ we see that $$a^2-(2bk)a+(b^2-k+1)=0.\quad(*)$$Let $$a_1=2bk-a=\frac{b^2-k+1}{a}$$be the other solution to the quadratic $(*).$ Notice that $a_1=2bk-a$ is odd and we claim it is also positive; assume the contrary. Then, $a_1\le -1$ since $a_1$ is odd. Hence, $$0<a_1^2+b^2+1=(2a_1b+1)k\le (-2b+1)<0,$$a contradiction. Therefore, $(a_1,b)$ is also a solution, meaning $a_1\ge a.$ Thus, \begin{align*}a_1&=\frac{b^2-k+1}{a}\le\frac{b^2+1}{a}\\&\implies b^2+1\ge aa_1\ge a^2\ge (b+1)^2,\end{align*}which is absurd, so we conclude that $a=b$ for all solutions $(a,b).$ $\square$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cursed_tangent1434
601 posts
#14 • 1 Y
Y by GeoKing
Assume there exists $a,b$ such that $a\neq b$ which satisfy the desired divisibility ($\frac{a^2+b^2+1}{2ab+1}=c>1$). We now consider the pair of odd positive integers $a,b$ such that $a+b$ is minimal and above condition is satisfied. Assume WLOG, $a\geq b$. Then, the quadratic
\[X^2-2Xbc+b^2-c+1=0\]will have roots $a,a_1$. Note that $a+a_1=2bc$ (thus $a_1\in \mathbb{Z}$ ) and $aa_1=b^2-c+1$. Now, if $c \geq b^2+1$,
\[a^2+b^2+1=c(2ab+1)\geq (b^2+1)(2ab+1)=2ab^3+b^2+2ab+1\]which implies that, $a\geq 2b^3+2b$ and since $a$ is odd, we have that,
\[a>2b^3+2b\]Now, note that, $2ab+1 \mid a^2+b^2+1 \iff 2ab+1 \mid 2b^3+2b-a$ with some work using the Euclidean Algorithm. Since $a>2b^3+2b$, this implies that,
\[a\geq 2ab+1+2b^3+2b>2ab>a\]which is a clear contradiction. Thus, $c<b^2+1$ and $a_1>0$. Further, this means
\[2a\leq a+a_1=2bc \implies c\geq \frac{a}{b}\]But this means,
\begin{align*}
\frac{a^2+b^2+1}{2ab+1} &\geq \frac{a}{b}\\
b^3+b \geq a^2b+b
\end{align*}But this implies that
\[b^3+b \geq a^2b+b > b^3+b\](since we assumed that $a\neq b$), which is a clear contradiction. Thus, there cannot exist such a pair $a,b$ which implies that we must have $a=b$ as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
bin_sherlo
708 posts
#15
Y by
WLOG $a\geq b$. Let $a=bk+r$ such that $0\leq r< b$.
\[2b^2k+2br+1|2(bk-b+r)^2=2b^2k^2+2b^2+2r^2+4bkr-4b^2k-4br\]\[2b^2k+2br+1|2b^2k^2+2brk+k\]$\implies 2b^2k+2br+1|2b^2+2r^2+2bkr-4b^2k-4br-k$
Also $2b^2k+2br+1|4b^2k+4br+2$
$\implies 2b^2k+2br+1|2b^2+2r^2-k+2+2bkr\iff 2b^2k+2br+1|(2b^2+2r^2+2+2bkr)-k$
So
\[P=\frac{(2b^2+2r^2+2+2bkr)-k}{2b^2k+2br+1}\geq 0\]is an integer.

P is at least 2
P=1
P=0
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by bin_sherlo, Mar 7, 2024, 6:13 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Vulch
2684 posts
#16
Y by
Redacted.
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by Vulch, Mar 6, 2024, 11:33 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Entrepreneur
1170 posts
#17 • 1 Y
Y by Vulch
Vulch wrote:
My solution:
$(a-b)^2=0$ implies that $a^2 +b^2=2ab.$
Or, $(a^2 +b^2 +1)=(2ab+1)\implies (a^2 +b^2 +1)/(2ab+1) =1.$
Which indicates that $(2ab+1)|(a^2 +b^2 +1).$
Therefore $(2ab+1)|(a^2 +b^2 +1)$ possible only when $(a+b)^2 =0$ i.e $a=b.$

Is this solution correct?

You proved that $$a=b\implies 2ab+1\mid a^2+b^2+1.$$But the original question asks to prove the reverse i.e. $$2ab+1\mid a^2+b^2+1\implies a=b.$$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ylmath123
105 posts
#18
Y by
\[2b^2k+2br+1|2b^2k^2+4brk+k\]???
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ylmath123
105 posts
#20
Y by
bin_sherlo wrote:
WLOG $a\geq b$. Let $a=bk+r$ such that $0\leq r< b$.
\[2b^2k+2br+1|2(bk-b+r)^2=2b^2k^2+2b^2+2r^2+4bkr-4b^2k-4br\]\[2b^2k+2br+1|2b^2k^2+4brk+k\]$\implies 2b^2k+2br+1|2b^2+2r^2-4b^2k-4br-k$
Also $2b^2k+2br+1|4b^2k+4br+2$
$\implies 2b^2k+2br+1|2b^2+2r^2-k+2\iff 2b^2k+2br+1|(2b^2+2r^2+2)-k$
$2b^2k+2br+k-2b^2-2r^2-1=k(2b^2+1)+2r(b-r)-(2b^2+1)=2r(b-r)+(k-1)(2b^2+1)\geq 0$ and equality holds when $k=1,r=0\iff a=b$.

If $r>0,$ then $2b^2+2r^2+2-k=0\iff k=2b^2+2r^2+2\iff a=2b^3+2br^2+2b+r$
We get that $r$ is odd.
\[4b^4+4b^2r^2+4b^2+2br+1|(2b^3+2br^2+b+r)^2\]\[4b^4+4b^2r^2+4b^2+2br+1|4b^6+4b^2r^4+b^2+r^2+8b^4r^2+4b^4+4b^3r+4b^2r^2+4br^3+2br\]Also
\[4b^4+4b^2r^2+4b^2+2br+1|4b^6+4b^4r^2+4b^4+2b^3r+b^2\]$\implies 4b^4+4b^2r^2+4b^2+2br+1|4b^2r^4+r^2+4b^4r^2+2b^3r+4b^2r^2+4br^3+2br$
$4b^4+4b^2r^2+4b^2+2br+1|4b^4r^2+4b^2r^4+4b^2r^2+2br^3+r^2$
$\implies 4b^4+4b^2r^2+4b^2+2br+1|2b^3r+2br^3+2br$
$(4b^4+4b^2r^2+4b^2+2br+1,2b)=1$ so
\[4b^4+4b^2r^2+4b^2+2br+1|b^2r+r^3+r\]But $4b^4+4b^2r^2+4b^2+2br+1>b^2r+r^3+r>0$ which gives a contradiction.$\blacksquare$

\[2b^2k+2br+1|2b^2k^2+4brk+k\]???
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
vincentwant
1345 posts
#21
Y by
Suppose that $a,b$ are two (not necessarily odd) positive integers such that $2ab+1 \mid a^2 + b^2 + 1$ and $a\neq b$. Prove that $2ab+1$ is a perfect square.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by vincentwant, Mar 9, 2024, 12:55 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ylmath123
105 posts
#22
Y by
vincentwant wrote:
Suppose that $a,b$ are two (not necessarily odd) positive integers such that $2ab+1 \mid a^2 + b^2 + 1$. Prove that $2ab+1$ is a perfect square.


wrong,if a=b,2ab+1 is not a perfect square.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
vincentwant
1345 posts
#23
Y by
ylmath123 wrote:
vincentwant wrote:
Suppose that $a,b$ are two (not necessarily odd) positive integers such that $2ab+1 \mid a^2 + b^2 + 1$. Prove that $2ab+1$ is a perfect square.


wrong,if a=b,2ab+1 is not a perfect square.

sorry, forgot about the a-b=0 case, this should be fixed
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Nobitasolvesproblems1979
25 posts
#28 • 1 Y
Y by GeoKing
I am unable to share the picture of my detailed solution so I am typing it idk latex let there exists a1,b for which a1+b is minimum,and ((a1)^2+b^2+1)/(2(a1)b+1)=k=integers such that k≥2,root of a^2-a(2kb)+b^2+1-k=0 are a1,a2 where a2>0 then we get that (a2)=2kb-(a1) which is integer now for minimality (a2)≥(a1)>b thus as (a1)(a2)=b^2+1-k so (a1)^2<(a1)^2+1-2 which is clearly impossible thus we get for any a,b k=1 or if a0,b0 is a solution where (a0)>(b0) and if we replace a0 with x for which ((a0)^2+(b0)^2+1)/(2(a0).b0+1)=k0 is unchanged then x is 0 because x can't be negative as the unchanged quantity (a0) is positive thus for that we get that (a0)+x=(a0)=2(k0)(b0),(a0)x=0=(b0)^2+1-k by vietas relation thus we get solutions (a,b) are {(2k(k^2+1),k),(k,2k(k^2+1)),(k,k) where k is any natural}
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Nobitasolvesproblems1979, Dec 17, 2024, 10:24 PM
Reason: Typing error
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Nobitasolvesproblems1979
25 posts
#29 • 1 Y
Y by GeoKing
Oo is it called vieta jumping idk I know only vietas relation in jee quadratic equation chapter :blush: btw soory idk latex and also I am unable to share pic pls anyone check I used imo p6 1988 trick here I solved that by taking hint of minimality so it's the same one
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Pseudo_Matter
4 posts
#30
Y by
Let a²+b²+1/2ab+1 =k.
a²+b²-2ab+1-k=0
Let assume that (a0,b0) is a solution of above equation such that a0≠b0,a0>b0,a0+b0 is minimum and a0,b0 are odd a²+(b0)²-2a(b0)+1-k=0
The above equation has a0 has one of its roots and a1(let).
a0+a1=2(b0)k.It implies that a1 is also odd.
a0a1=(b0)²+1-k a1=((b0)²+1-k)/a0
Due to minimality of a0, a0<a1 (a0)²<(b0)²+1-k
k-1<(b0-a0)(b0+a0)
(a0-b0)²)/2(a0)(b0)+1 < (b0-a0)(b0+a0)
(a0-b0)/2(a0)(b0)+1 < -(a0+b0)
This is a contradiction.
It implies that a0 is not minimum
By FMID,we can say that if 2ab+1|a²+b²+1 then a=b. (a0 means that 0 is in subscript of a).This is my first post so don't know how to post a good written solution.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Pseudo_Matter, Apr 13, 2025, 11:27 PM
Reason: The previous post was messy
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a