another functional inequality?

Art of Problem Solving

AoPS Online

High School Olympiads Regional, national, and international math olympiads

Regional, national, and international math olympiads

3 M G

BBookmark VNew Topic kLocked

High School Olympiads Regional, national, and international math olympiads

Regional, national, and international math olympiads

3 M G

BBookmark VNew Topic kLocked

w

10 users

TOPICS

No tags match your search

M

No tags match your search

M

another functional inequality?

G H J

Reveal topic tags

Functional inequality

L

G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply

Source: 2023 ISL A4

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

387 posts

#1 h Jul 17, 2024, 12:07 PM • 5 Y

Y by GrantStar, ehuseyinyigit, OronSH, ohiorizzler1434, NCbutAN

Let $\mathbb R_{>0}$ be the set of positive real numbers. Determine all functions $f \colon \mathbb R_{>0} \to \mathbb R_{>0}$ such that $x \big(f(x) + f(y)\big) \geqslant \big(f(f(x)) + y\big) f(y)$ for every $x, y \in \mathbb R_{>0}$ .

This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by Scilyse, Feb 11, 2025, 9:51 AM

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

44 posts

#2 h Jul 17, 2024, 12:08 PM • 4 Y

Y by OronSH, ZVFrozel, BorivojeGuzic123, Muaaz.SY

Let $P(x,y)$ denote the assertion:
$x(f(x)+f(y))\geq (f(f(x))+y)f(y)$ $P(f(x),x)+P(f(f(x)),f(x)): 2f(f(x))\geq f(f(f(f(x))))+x$ Easy induction gives $f(f(x))> \frac{n}{n+1} x$

Now take $n\to +\infty ~$ to get $~f(f(x))\geq x$

Using this inequality in $P(x,y)$ gives us:

$xf(x)\geq yf(y)\implies xf(x)=c\implies f(x)=\frac{c}{x}~ \forall x\in \mathbb{R_+}$ Which is indeed a solution for any $c>0$ . $~\blacksquare$

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

1748 posts

OronSH

#3 h Jul 17, 2024, 12:09 PM • 4 Y

Y by peace09, megarnie, scannose, MS_asdfgzxcvb

The answer is $f(x)=\frac cx$ for constant $c,$ which clearly works.

First taking $x=y$ gives $f(f(x))\le x.$

Now rearrange the inequality to $xf(x)\ge f(y)(f(f(x))+y-x).$ This becomes $\frac{xf(x)}{yf(y)}\ge1+\frac{f(f(x))-x}y.$ Now the RHS gets arbitrarily close to $1$ from below (or equals $1$ ) as $y$ gets large, for fixed $x.$ Additionally this gives us that as $y$ gets large, $f(y)$ gets arbitrarily close to $0.$

Then setting $x=f(y)$ in the original inequality gives $y-f(f(y))\le f(y)-f(f(f(y)))<f(y),$ so $y-f(f(y))$ gets arbitrarily close to $0$ for large $y.$

Now if we swap variable names, we get $\frac{yf(y)}{xf(x)}\ge 1+\frac{f(f(y))-y}x.$ If we fix $x$ and make $y$ arbitrarily large, the RHS gets arbitrarily close to $1$ from below.

Now we have arbitrarily tight bounds on $\frac{xf(x)}{yf(y)}$ in both directions. Thus fixing some positive reals $x,z$ gives us $\frac{xf(x)}{yf(y)}$ and $\frac{yf(y)}{zf(z)}$ are arbitrarily close to $1,$ so their product, which is constant, must be $1.$ Thus $xf(x)$ is some constant $c$ for all $x,$ and thus $f(x)=\frac cx.$

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

302 posts

#4 h Jul 17, 2024, 12:21 PM • 2 Y

Y by OronSH, Sourena-Majedi

Solving this during TST was an extremely proud moment for me.

Let $P(x,y)$ denote the assertion $x \cdot (f(x)+f(y)) \geq (f(f(x))+y) \cdot f(y)$ .
$P(x,x) \implies 2xf(x) \geq f(x)f(f(x))+xf(x) \implies x \geq f(f(x))$ .
$P(f(x),x) \implies f(f(x))+f(x) \geq f^3(x)+x \implies f(x)-f^3(x) \geq x-f(f(x))$ .

Now assume $f(f(a))>a$ for some $a \in \mathbb{R}^+$ .
Then put $a-f(f(a))=c$ , note that for all positive integers $n$ , we may inductively show that $f^{2n}(a)-f^{2n+2}(a) \geq c$ .
But this would imply that there exists some $n$ such that $f^n(a)<0$ , contradiction.
Hence $f(f(x))=x$ for all $x$ .

Putting this back into the original equation, we get $x \cdot (f(x)+f(y)) \geq (x+y) \cdot f(y) \implies xf(x) \geq yf(y)$ for all $x,y$ .
So $xf(x)=yf(y)$ for all $x,y$ . Put $xf(x)=k$ for some constant $k$ , we see that $f(x)=\frac{k}{x}$ . It is easy to check that this is a solution.

Hence the solutions are $f(x)=\frac{k}{x}$ for some constant $k \in \mathbb{R}^+$ .

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

136 posts

#5 h Jul 17, 2024, 12:25 PM • 1 Y

Y by OronSH

We take $P(f(x), x)$ to get $f(x)(f(f(x))+f(x)) \geq f(x)(f(f(f(x))) + x) \iff f(f(x)) + f(x) \geq f(f(f(x))) + x$
Thus $f(x) + f^2(x) \geq f^3(x) + x$ . Take $x$ to $f(x) \implies f^2(x) + f^3(x) \geq f^4(x) + f(x)$ . Adding them, we get $2 f^2(x) \geq f^4(x) + x$ .
Easy induction to get: $f^{2n}(x) \leq x + n(f^2(x) - x)$

If $f^2(x) < x \implies f^{2n}(x) < 0$ , for $n$ large enough.
So, $f^2(x) \geq x$ .

$P(x, x) \implies 2x f(x) \geq f(x) (x + f^2(x)) \iff 2x \leq x + f^2(x) \implies f(f(x)) = x$

$P(x, y) \implies x f(x) \leq y f(y)$ . Swapping $x$ and $y$ , we get $f(x) = \frac{c}{x}$ , for some constant $c$ . This function clearly works.

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

5611 posts

#6 h Jul 17, 2024, 1:15 PM • 1 Y

Y by OronSH

The only solutions are $f(x) = \frac{c}{x}$ for some positive real constant $c$ . These clearly work. Now we prove they are the only solutions.

Let $P(x,y)$ denote the given assertion.

$P(x, x): 2xf(x) \ge (f(f(x)) + x) f(x) \implies f(f(x)) \le x$ .

$P(f(x), x): f(x) (f(f(x)) + f(x)) \ge (f^3(x) + x)f(x)$ , so $f(f(x)) + f(x) \ge f^3(x) + x$ , implying that $f(x) - f^3(x) \ge x - f(f(x))$ .

Claim: $f$ is an involution
Proof: Consider some $x$ where $f(f(x)) < x$ . Then let $d = x - f(f(x)) > 0$ . We have $d \le f(x) - f^3(x) \le f(f(x)) - f^4(x) \ldots,$ so $d \le f^n(x) - f^{n+2}(x)$ for any nonnegative integer $n$ , meaning that $f^{n+2}(x) \le f^n(x) - d$ . Next we induct to show that $f^{2n}(x) \le x - n\cdot d$ for any positive integer $n$ . The base case $n = 1$ holds from $f(f(x)) = x - d$ . Suppose it was true for $2k$ . Then we have $f^{2k + 2} (x) \le f^{2k}(x) - d \le x - k \cdot d - d = x - (k+1)d$ , as desired.

Since $d > 0$ , choose $n$ sufficiently large so that $x - n \cdot d < 0$ . Then $f$ becomes negative, absurd. $\square$

Now the equation becomes $x(f(x) + f(y)) \ge (x + y) f(y)$ , so $xf(x) \ge y f(y)$ and since $y f(y) \ge xf(x)$ also by swapping $x,y$ , we have that $xf(x) = yf(y)$ for all reals $x,y$ , so $xf(x) = f(1)$ , meaning $f(x) = \frac{f(1)}{x}$ , as desired.

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

407 posts

#7 h Jul 17, 2024, 1:43 PM • 1 Y

Y by isomoBela

As usual, $P(x,y)$ denotes the assertion of $(x,y)$ into the functional inequality, and $f^k(x)$ denotes an iteration rather than a power. First, $P(x,x)$ yields $x \geq f(f(x))$ , and then $P(f(x),x)$ gives
$f(x)(f^2(x)+f(x)) \geq (f^3(x)+x)f(x)\Longrightarrow f^2(x) + f(x) \geq f^3(x) + x.$ Plugging $f(x)$ in the last inequality and summing:
$\begin{align*} f^3(x) + f^2(x) &\geq f^4(x) + f(x)\\ f^2(x) + f(x) &\geq f^3(x) + x\\ \Longrightarrow (f^3(x) + f^2(x)) + (f^2(x) + f(x)) &\geq (f^4(x) + f(x)) + (f^3(x) + x)\\ \Longrightarrow f^2(x) - f^4(x) &\geq x - f^2(x). \end{align*}$ Hence, if $a_k(x) = f^{2k}(x) - f^{2k+2}(x)$ , we know from before that $a_0(x) \geq 0$ , but if $a_0(x)>0$ for some $x$ , then from the last inequality, the sequence $a_k(x)$ is monotonically increasing. However, this implies $f^{2k}(x) \leq x - k(x-f^2(x))$ , which for large enough $k$ becomes negative, contradiction.

Therefore, $f^2(x) = x$ for all $x>0$ , and the original functional inequality becomes simply $xf(x) \geq yf(y)$ . This is possible only if $xf(x)$ is constant, i.e. $f(x) = \frac{c}{x}$ for all $x$ and some positive constant $c$ . These functions clearly work, so we're done.

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

26 posts

Tqhoud

#8 h Jul 17, 2024, 5:58 PM

Y by

let

$P(x,y):x(f(x)+f(y))\ge (ff(x)+y)f(y)$
$P(x,x):x\ge ff(x)$
$P(f(y),y):ff(y)+f(y)\ge fff(y)+y$
$P(ff(y),f(y)):fff(y)+ff(y)\ge ffff(y)+f(y)$
So

$2ff(x)\ge y+ffff(y)$
$ff(y)-ffff(y)\ge y-ff(y)$
if exist a number $y$ such that

$y>ff(y)$

We can define $C \colon \mathbb N_{>0} \to \mathbb R_{\ge 0}$ is a function such that

$f^{2i-2}(y)=f^{2i}(y)+C(1)+C(2)+.....+C(i-1)+C(i)$
and $C(1)>0$ because $y=ff(y)+C(1)$

it appears that $f^{2i-2}(y)-C(1)\ge f^{2i}(y)$

and because $C(1)$ is a constant there is a positive integer $k$ such that

$f^{2k}(y)<0$
wrong result

So $C(1)=0$ and $y=ff(y)$

by editing in the main inequality

$xf(x)\ge yf(y)$
and this lead to be $f(x)=\frac{c}{x}$ . where $c$ is a positive real number and these functions work

This post has been edited 8 times. Last edited by Tqhoud, Jul 18, 2024, 8:57 AM
Reason: .

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

3371 posts

#9 h Jul 17, 2024, 6:05 PM • 2 Y

Y by peace09, Funcshun840

The answer is $f(x) \equiv \tfrac{c}{x}$ where $c > 0$ . Let $P(x,y)$ denote the given assertion. We have that $P(x,x)$ gives $f(f(x)) \le x$ and $P(f(x), x)$ gives $x - f(f(x)) \le f(x) - f(f(f(x)))$ . This implies that $x - f^2(x) \le f^2(x) - f^4(x) \le f^4(x) - f^6(x) \cdots$
Claim: $f(f(x)) = x$ for all $x$

Assume for contradiction that there exists an $x$ such that $x > f(f(x))$ . Then the sequence $f^{2k}(x)$ will always skip down by at least $x-f(f(x))$ as $k$ increments. Therefore, $f^{2k}(x)$ will be negative for sufficiently large enough $k$ , resulting in the desired contradiction.

We can easily plug in the previous claim into the assertion to get $xf(x) \ge yf(y)$ and from swapping we obviously get $yf(y) \ge xf(x)$ , implying $xf(x)$ is constant. Therefore we have $f(x) \equiv \tfrac{c}{x}$ which clearly works.

This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by pi271828, Jul 17, 2024, 6:07 PM

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

180 posts

dkedu

#11 h Jul 17, 2024, 11:10 PM • 1 Y

Y by BorivojeGuzic123

We claim the only solution is $f(x) = \frac cx$ for positive $c$ which is easy to see that these work.

Let $P(x,y)$ denote the assertion. By taking $P(f(y),y)$ , we get that
$y - f(f(y)) \le f(f(f(y))) - f(y)$ But this means
$y - f(f(y)) \le f^4(y) - f^2(y) \cdots$ So we we have $f(f(y)) = y$ , otherwise repeat the above pattern until we get a $f^{2n}(y) < 0$ which is a contradiction. Plug this back in to get
$x(f(x) + f(y)) \ge (x+y)f(y) \implies xf(x) \ge yf(y) \implies xf(x) = yf(y) \: \forall x,y \in \mathbb{R}_{>0}$ So we recall our original solutions.

This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by dkedu, Jul 17, 2024, 11:13 PM

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

83 posts

#12 h Jul 18, 2024, 7:18 PM • 1 Y

Y by Eka01

Solution

This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by Sammy27, Jul 18, 2024, 7:31 PM

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

15 posts

#13 h Jul 19, 2024, 5:33 PM

Y by

Easy problem

$P(x,x): x \ge f(f(x))$
$P(f(y),y): f(y)-f(f(f(y))) \ge y-f(f(y))$
By repeat iteration, we get sequence ${f^{2k+2}(y)-f^{2k}(y)}$ does not decrease
But when $y-f(f(y))>0$ , this will lead to $f^{2N}(y)<0$ with sufficiently large N by summing up the differences
So $y=f(f(y))$ then we can easily know $xf(x)=yf(y)$ for all positive real number $x,y$ , and this lead to $f(x)=\frac{c}{x}$

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

167 posts

#14 h Jul 20, 2024, 2:56 PM

Y by

Am I right?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1139915557987160114/1264233135781183510/SPOILER_IMG_2219_2.jpeg?ex=669d205b&is=669bcedb&hm=e73302bc768e30e5e650542c9b438debcd1e8a1a1b6a2ab523240b2f79465c22&

remark

This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by shanelin-sigma, Jul 23, 2024, 5:08 AM
Reason: My bad

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

1831 posts

#15 h Jul 20, 2024, 8:51 PM

Y by

First, take $y = x$ to get $x\ge f^2(x)$ . Now fix a real $a_0 > 0$ and define the sequence $a_n = f^n(a_0)$ for each $n\ge 0$ . We claim the following:

Claim 1: $a_{n+1} - a_{n+3}\ge a_{n} - a_{n+2}$ .
proof: Take $(x,y) = (a_{n+1}, a_n)$ in the FE to get $a_{n+1}a_{n+2} + a_{n+1}^2\ge a_{n+3}a_{n+1}+ a_na_{n+1}$ . Divide by $a_{n+1}$ and rearrange to finish $\square$ .

Claim 2: $a_{2n}\le a_0 - (a_0-a_2)n$
proof: Induct on $n$ . Base case of $n = 0$ is obvious, now suppose it holds for some $n$ . Then
$a_{2n+2}\le 2a_{2n} - a_{2n-2} = a_{2n} -(a_{2n-2} - a_{2n}) \le a_{2n} - (a_0 - a_2)\le a_0 - (a_0-a_2)(n+1),$ done $\square$

A consequence of claim 2 is that $\{a_{2n}\}_{n\ge 0}$ is unbounded from below if $a_0-a_2 > 0$ . But that's impossible since $\{a_{2n}\}_{n\ge 0}$ is a sequence of positive reals. Since $a_0 - a_2\ge 0$ , we are then forced to have $a_0 - a_2 = 0$ . Hence $a_0 = a_2$ , meaning $f(f(a_0)) = a_0$ for all $a_0$ . The original FE then rewrites as
$xf(x) + xf(y)\ge xf(y) + yf(y)\implies xf(x)\ge yf(y)$ for all $x,y > 0$ . Swap $x,y$ to get $xf(x) = yf(y)$ for all $x,y$ . Take $y = 1$ to finally get $\boxed{f(x) = f(1)/x}$ for all $x$ , which clearly works.

This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by brainfertilzer, Jul 20, 2024, 8:52 PM

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

1391 posts

#16 h Jul 21, 2024, 12:19 AM

Y by

Solution

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

419 posts

#17 h Jul 21, 2024, 4:20 PM

Y by

Given condition is equivalent to:
$P(x,y):\ \left(f\left(f\left(x\right)\right)+y-x\right)f\left(y\right)\le xf\left(x\right)$
$P(x,x):\ f(f(x))\leq x$ .

Claim: $f(f(x))=x$ for every $x>0$ .
Proof. $P(f(x),x):\ 0\leq x-f(f(x)) \leq f(x) - f(f(f(x)))$
Hence, if $t=x-f(f(x))>0$ , then $f^n(x)-f^{n+2}(x)\geq t$ for every $n\geq 0$ . So, for any $n$ , we have $f^{2n}(x)\geq t\Longrightarrow f^{2n-2}(x)\geq 2t, f^{2n-4}(t)\geq 3t, \ldots, x\geq nt,$ which is impossible for sufficiently large $n$ . This forces $t=0$ , and $f(f(x))=x$ for every $x>0$ . $\blacksquare$

This means $P(x,y)\Longleftrightarrow xf(x)\geq yf(y)$ , while $P(y,x)\Longleftrightarrow yf(y)\geq xf(x)\Longrightarrow xf(x)=yf(y)$ . So, $xf(x)=c$ for some constant $c>0$ . So, $f(x)=\frac cx$ for all $x$ , which indeed satisfies the original condition. $\blacksquare$

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

920 posts

#18 h Jul 22, 2024, 3:02 PM

Y by

The only solution is $f(x)=\frac{c}{x}, c\in \mathbb{R}_{>0}$ , which turns the inequality into an equality. Let $P(x,y)$ be the given assertion.

Checking $P(x,f(x))$ gives that $x\geq f(f(x))$ . Define $d(x)=x-f(f(x))$ . The assertion $P(f(x),x)$ gives that $d(f(x))\geq d(x)$ . This implies that $d(f(f(x)))\geq d(x)$ . However we have that $(k+1)d(x)\leq d(x)+d(f^2(x))+\dots+d(f^{2k}(x))=x-f^{2k+2}(x)\leq x$ By taking $k\rightarrow \infty$ we must have that $d(x)=0$ , that is $f(f(x))=x$ .

This simplifies the assertion to $xf(x)\geq yf(y)$ . Then however both sides must be constant, implying the above solution.

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

15 posts

#19 h Jul 22, 2024, 5:52 PM

Y by

shanelin-sigma wrote:

Am I right?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1139915557987160114/1264233135781183510/SPOILER_IMG_2219_2.jpeg?ex=669d205b&is=669bcedb&hm=e73302bc768e30e5e650542c9b438debcd1e8a1a1b6a2ab523240b2f79465c22&

Why does $min(G)$ exist?I think you should use the supremum and infimum principle instead of directly setting the minimum value

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

167 posts

#20 h Jul 23, 2024, 5:02 AM

Y by

Yue-Zhang_3906 wrote:

Why does $min(G)$ exist?I think you should use the supremum and infimum principle instead of directly setting the minimum value

Oh no, I made an elementary mistake. Sorry :stretcher:

:stretcher:

but how could I fix it?

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

67 posts

#21 h Jul 25, 2024, 9:57 PM • 1 Y

Y by shanelin-sigma

Based on my solution during my country's TST which it appeared in which also seems to be the first proof of this sort on this thread.

Denote the asserion by $P\left(x,y\right)$ .
From $P\left(x,x\right)$ we have $f\left(f\left(x\right)\right)\leq x$ .
Now take $x\to0$ in $P\left(x,y\right)$ and denote $c_1=\liminf_{x\to0}{xf\left(x\right)}$ :
$0<f\left(f\left(x\right)\right)\leq x\to0\Rightarrow yf\left(y\right)\leq c_1$ So we have a function that is at most it's liminf meaning $\lim_{x\to0}{xf\left(x\right)}=c_1$ .
Now $f\left(y\right)\leq\frac{c_1}{y}$ meaning $\lim_{y\to\infty}{f\left(y\right)}=0$ so taking $y\to\infty$ in $P\left(x,y\right)$ and denoting $c_2=\limsup_{y\to\infty}{yf\left(y\right)}$ gives $xf\left(x\right)\geq c_2$ and similarly to earlier, the function is always at least it's limsup meaning $\lim_{x\to\infty}{xf\left(x\right)}=c_2$ .
So for now we have:
$c_1\geq xf\left(x\right)\geq c_2$ Now notice $c_1\leq c_2$ which follows from taking $x\to\infty$ in $f\left(x\right)f\left(f\left(x\right)\right)\leq xf\left(x\right)$ so we have $xf\left(x\right)$ is constant i.e. $f\left(x\right)=\frac{c}{x},c\in\mathbb{R}_{>0}\thinspace\forall x\in\mathbb{R}_{>0}$ which fits.

This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by rrrMath, Nov 17, 2024, 8:38 PM

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

15 posts

#22 h Jul 27, 2024, 1:56 PM

Y by

Firstly, we rewrite the given inequality as $xf(x)\geqslant f(y)(f(f(x))-x+y)$ . Notice that $\lim_{x \to \infty}f(x)=0$ . To see this, fix $x$ and take $y$ to infinity. The left hand side of the inequality is constant, but the right hand side is asymptotically $yf(y)$ , so $f(y)$ must go to 0. Again, by taking $y$ to infinity we have
$xf(x)\geqslant \limsup_{y \to \infty}yf(y)\implies M:=\inf \{xf(x) | x \in \mathbb{R}_{>0}\}\geqslant \limsup_{y \to \infty}yf(y).$ Plugging in $x=y$ gives $x\geqslant f(f(x))$ for all $x$ . Multiplying this by $f(x)$ gives $xf(x)\geqslant f(x)f(f(x))$ and hence
$M \geqslant \limsup_{x\to \infty}f(x)f(f(x)).$ Setting $x$ to $f(x)$ in the initial inequality and taking $x$ to infinity gives
$M \geqslant \limsup_{x\to \infty}f(x)f(f(x)) \geqslant yf(y) -f(y)\limsup_{x\to \infty}(f(x)-f(f(f(x)))),$ but since $\lim_{x \to \infty}f(x)=0$ and $f(x)\geqslant f(f(f(x)))$ , we get that the last limsup is equal to 0. Finally we get that
$M\geqslant yf(y)$ for any $y$ . By the definition of $M$ , we must have an equality for all $y$ , so $f(x)=\frac{M}{x}$ for all $x$ . This is in fact a solution for any positive $M$ .

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

SomeonesPenguin

129 posts

SomeonesPenguin

#23 h Aug 9, 2024, 4:06 PM

Y by

Straightforward enough.

Solution

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

54 posts

jp62

#24 h Aug 18, 2024, 4:40 AM • 1 Y

Y by OronSH

$\begin{align*} s&\geq f(f(s))\tag{$P(s,s)$}\\ &\geq\frac{\alpha f(\alpha)}{f(s)}-f(\alpha)\tag{$P(f(s),\alpha)$ dropping the $f(f(x))$ term}\\ &\geq\frac{\alpha f(\alpha)}{\beta f(\beta)}(s-\beta)-f(\alpha)\tag{$P(\beta,s)$ dropping the $f(f(x))$ term}\\ \end{align*}$ which fails for $\alpha f(\alpha)>\beta f(\beta)$ and sufficiently large $s>\beta$ . We conclude.

Comments / Rant

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

279 posts

#25 h Oct 29, 2024, 7:09 AM

Y by

based problem
solution

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

128 posts

#26 h Nov 17, 2024, 7:38 PM

Y by

We uploaded our solution https://calimath.org/pdf/ISL2023-A4.pdf on youtube https://youtu.be/aDr1Ai0uwgw.

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

21 posts

#28 h Dec 1, 2024, 5:23 PM

Y by

We rewrite as $f(y) (x-f^2(x)) \ge yf(y) - xf(x)$ . Putting $(x,x)$ gives $x\ge f^2(x) \Rightarrow f^{n} (x) \ge f^{n+2} (x)$ . Notice that $x\ge f^2(x) \ge f^4(x) \ge \ldots > 0.$ This implies that $\lim\limits_{n\to \infty} f^{2n} (x) - f^{2n + 2}(x) = 0$ . Putting $(f^{2n}(x),y)$ gives us
$f(y)(f^{2n}(x)-f^{2n+2}(x))\ge yf(y) - f^{2n}(x)f^{2n+1}(x) \ge yf(y) - xf(x).$ Fixing $x,y$ and taking $n\to\infty$ implies that $0 \ge yf(y)-xf(x)$ , thus $xf(x) \equiv c$ for some $c > 0$ .

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

297 posts

N3bula

#29 h Dec 10, 2024, 2:18 AM • 1 Y

Y by OronSH

Let $P(x, y)$ be the assertion in the question.
$P(x, x)$ $x\leq f(f(x))$ Rearrange the inequality to:
$\frac{xf(x)}{yf(y)}\geq \frac{f(f(x))-x}{y}+1$ Thus we get that $\frac{xf(x)}{yf(y)}$ gets abitrarily close to $1$ from below as we
make $y$ large. By swapping variables we get that $\frac{yf(y)}{xf(x)}$ gets abitrarily
close to $1$ from below as we make $x$ large. So we get that $xf(x)=c$ for some fixed
$c$ . Thus the only solutions are $f(x)=\frac{c}{x}$ .

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

6 posts

Gelu

#30 h Dec 12, 2024, 3:00 AM

Y by

it is very easy such that we just try monotonnia of function F ,and get $f(x)=\frac{c}{x}$

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

8868 posts

#31 h Dec 13, 2024, 4:31 AM

Y by

The answer is $f(x) = \frac cx$ for every positive real $c$ , which work.

Setting $y = f(x)$ yields $x(f(x)+f(f(x)) \geq f(f(x))(f(x)+f(f(x)))$ for every $x$ , i.e. $x \geq f(f(x))$ for each $x$ . I will show that this must actually be an equality:

Claim: $f(f(x)) = x$ for every real number $x$ .

Proof: Assume for the sake of contradiction that there exists an $\varepsilon > 0$ such that $f(f(x_0)) < x_0 - \varepsilon$ for some fixed $x_0$ . Setting $f(x_0), x_0$ in the original equation,
$f(x_0)(f(f(x_0)) + f(x_0)) \geq f(x_0)(f(f(f(x_0))) + x_0)$ so in particular $f(x_0) - f(f(f(x_0))) \geq f(f(x_0)) - f(x_0) > \varepsilon.$ Repeatedly applying this argument, it follows that $f^{2n-2}(x_0) - f^{2n}(x_0) < \varepsilon$ for each $\varepsilon$ . But picking an $n$ such that $n\varepsilon > x_0$ , $f^{2n+2}(x_0) < 0$ , which is a contradiction. $\blacksquare$

Thus we have $x(f(x) + f(y)) \geq (x+y)f(y) \iff xf(x) \geq yf(y)$ for every pair of real numbers $(x, y)$ . This implies $xf(x) = yf(y)$ for all $(x, y)$ , so $xf(x) = c$ , and $f(x) = \frac cx$ for some $c > 0$ all work.

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

6 posts

#33 h Feb 21, 2025, 9:36 AM • 1 Y

Y by OronSH

Denote $P(x,y)$ the assertion.
It follows from $P(x,x)$ that
$2xf(x)\ge\big(f\big(f(x)\big)+x\big)f(x)\Longleftrightarrow 2x\ge f\big(f(x)\big)+x\Longleftrightarrow f\big(f(x)\big)\le x$ $\begin{align} f(x)f\big(f(x)\big)\le xf\big(f(x)\big). \end{align}$ For any fixed $x>0$ and $y>2x-2f\big(f(x)\big)\ge0$ , we have
$\begin{align*} yf(y)&=\left(1+\frac{x-f\big(f(x)\big)}{y+f\big(f(x)\big)-x}\right)\left(y+f\big(f(x)\big)-x\right)f(y)\\ &\le\left(1+\frac{x-f\big(f(x)\big)}{y+f\big(f(x)\big)-x}\right)xf(x)\\ &<2xf(x). \end{align*}$ So $yf(y)$ remains bounded as $y\to\infty$ , this consequently implies $\lim_{y\to\infty}f(y)=0$ .
If we have $\lim_{x\to0^+}xf(x)=\infty$ , since $f(x)\to0$ as $x\to\infty$ it is true that $f(x)f\big(f(x)\big)\to\infty$ as $x\to\infty$ . But $xf(x)$ is bounded from above as $x\to\infty$ , and this contradicts with $(1)$ if we let $x$ goes to $\infty$ . Hence we may write $L=\liminf_{x\to0^+}xf(x)<\infty$ .
An application of $P(x,y)$ shows that
$\begin{align*} yf(y)&=\liminf_{x\to0^+}yf(y)\\ &\le\liminf_{x\to0^+}\big(xf(y)-f\big(f(x)\big)f(y)+xf(x)\big)\\ &\le\liminf_{x\to0^+}\big(xf(y)+xf(x)\big)\\ &=\liminf_{x\to0^+}xf(x)=L. \end{align*}$ So $xf(x)\le L$ for any $x>0$ . We consequently have $\liminf_{x\to0^+}xf(x)\le\limsup_{x\to0^+}xf(x)\le L$ , and so $\liminf_{x\to0^+}xf(x)=\limsup_{x\to0^+}xf(x)=L$ or $\lim_{x\to0^+}xf(x)=L$ .
Now we look again at $(1)$ . We have $\liminf_{x\to\infty}xf(x)\le\limsup_{x\to\infty}xf(x)\le L$ , on the other hand $f(x)\to0$ as $x\to\infty$ so $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)f\big(f(x)\big)=L$ . We deduce that $L=\liminf_{x\to\infty}f(x)f\big(f(x)\big)\le\liminf_{x\to\infty}xf(x)$ , and hence $\lim_{x\to\infty}xf(x)=L$ .
We rewrite the given inequality as
$xf(x)\ge f\big(f(x)\big)f(y)-xf(y)+yf(y).$ Take the limit as $y\to\infty$ yields $xf(x)\ge L$ for $x>0$ . We also proved the inequality $xf(x)\le L$ for all $x>0$ , so $f(x)\equiv\frac{L}{x}$ . Then the inequality turns into an equality, and hence $f(x)\equiv\frac{L}{x}$ satisfies. All solutions of the problem are in the form $f(x)\equiv\frac{c}{x}$ , with $c$ being some positive constant.\qed

This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by thaiquan2008, Feb 21, 2025, 1:13 PM

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

672 posts

#34 h Mar 11, 2025, 4:53 AM

Y by

Claim: $f$ is an involution
Proof: Take $(x, x)$ to get $x\geq f^2(x).$ Take $f^2(x) + f(x)\geq x + f^3(x).$ Rearrangement tells us that $f(x) - f^3(x) \geq x - f^2(x)\geq0.$ In particular, $f^k(x) - f^{k + 2}(x)\geq x - f^2(x).$ If we add these up, we get:
$\begin{align*} y - f^{2k}(x) & = \sum_{n=0}^{k - 1} f^{2n}(y) - f^{2n + 2}(y) \\ & \geq \sum_{n = 0}^{k - 1}y - f^2(y) \\ & = k(y - f^2(y)) \geq 0 \end{align*}$ However, $y - f^{2k}(x) < y,$ and so $y - f^2(y) \leq \frac yk,$ and by sending $k$ to infinity, we force $f^2(y) = y.$

To conclude, let $f(1) = c.$ Then, take $x = 1, y = 1$ to get $f\equiv \frac cx.$

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

8 posts

#35 h Apr 20, 2025, 8:25 PM

Y by

Look mom it's pink

Taking $x = y$ in the statement, we get $x(f(x) + f(x)) \geq (f(f(x)) + x)f(x)$ , from which $2xf(x) \geq xf(x) + f(x)f(f(x))$ , so $xf(x) \geq f(f(x))f(x)$ . We can divide by $f(x)$ since $f(x)>0$ , and we find $x \geq f(f(x)), \forall x \in \mathbb{R}$ . ( $\bigstar$ )

Next, by taking $x \rightarrow f(y)$ in the statement, we get $f(y)(f(f(y)) + f(y)) \geq (f(f(f(y))) + y)f(y)$ , and dividing by $f(y)$ once more, we get $f(f(y)) + f(y) \geq y + f(f(f(y)))$ , from where $f(f(y)) - y \geq f(f(f(y))) - f(y), \forall y \in \mathbb{R}$ . Fix $y$ , and let $a_n = f^{n}(y)$ (that is $f$ applied $n$ times to $y$ ).

So we have $a_{n+2} - a_n \geq a_{n+3} - a_{n+1}$ . Increasing $n$ by $1$ , we also get $a_{n+3} - a_{n+1} \geq a_{n+4} - a_{n+2}$ . Joining the two inequalities, we have $a_{n+2} - a_n \geq a_{n+4} - a_{n+2}$ .

From $\bigstar$ , we know that the difference $a_{n+2} - a_n$ is zero or negative. Assume it's negative, and let $a_{2} = a_0 + c$ , with $c < 0$ . Then $a_4 - a_2 \leq c$ , so $a_4 \leq a_2 + c$ , so $a_4 \leq a_0 + 2c$ . Inductively, we have $a_{2n} \leq a_0 + n \times c$ , and since $a_{2n+2} - a_{2n} \leq c$ , we have $a_{2n+2} \leq a_0 + (n+1) \times c$ .

We know that $f(x) > 0$ always, so if $c<0$ , then $a_0 + nc$ is unbounded negatively as $n$ increases, meaning from a certain $N$ higher, $a_0 + nc < 0$ , which implies $a_{2n} < 0$ , false. So $c=0$ , so $f(f(x)) = x$ .

Returning to the statement, we find $xf(x) \geq yf(y)$ . Swapping $x$ and $y$ , we get $yf(y) \geq xf(x)$ , and the two inequalities imply $xf(x) = yf(y) = k$ , from where $f(x) = k / x$ , which verifies for any $k>0$ .

Z K Y

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.

This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.

243 posts

#36 h May 5, 2025, 10:25 PM

Y by

Let $P(x,y)$ denote the assertion.

$P(x,x)$ gives us that $x \ge f(f(x))$ .

Claim: For all $n \in \mathbb N$ , we have $f(f(x)) \ge \frac{nx}{n+1}$ and in particular we have $f(f(x)) \ge x$ .
Proof: By summing up $P(f(x),x)$ and $P(f(f(x)),f(x))$ , we have $2f^2(x) \ge x+f^4(x)>x \implies f^2(x) > \frac x2$ So base case is complete. Now assume it i true for $n=N$ . Then see that $2f^2(x) \ge x+f^4(x) \ge x+\frac{N}{N+1} f^2(x) \implies f^2(x) \ge \frac{(N+1)x}{N+2}$ And we are done. $\square$

This implies $f(f(x))=x$ and subbing it back in parent equation we have $xf(x) \ge yf(y)$ so $xf(x)$ is some constant (all such functions can be checked to work).

Hence only solutions are $\boxed{f(x) \equiv \frac cx \text{ } \forall \text{ } x \in \mathbb R_{>0}} \text{ where } c \in \mathbb R_{>0}$

Z K Y

N Quick Reply

G

H

=

© 2025 AoPS Incorporated

a