

In this topic, I'll prove some properties related to the orthocenter

of

respectively (where

is an arbitrary point). Note that all symbols in this post bear the same meaning (except
).
Property 1 : Let

be the isogonal conjugate of

WRT

and let

be its pedal triangle WRT

Then

is inscribed in

(i.e.

lies on

respectively.).
Proof : Let

be the antipedal triangle of

WRT

Since

lie on a circle with diameter

so

Similarly, we can prove

so we get

Combining

i.e.

____________________________________________________________
Property 2 : Let

be the orthocenter of

and let

be the midpoint of

Then the anticomplement

of

WRT

is the orthocenter of
Proof : Let

be the centroid of

Clearly,

is the centroid of

so the midpoint of

is the complement of

WRT

Notice

is the reflection of

in the midpoint of

we get

Analogously, we can prove

and

so

is the orthocenter of

____________________________________________________________
Property 3 : Let

be the orthocenter of

respectively. Then the A-altitude of

are concurrent (similar for

and
).
Proof : Let

cuts

at

and let

be the projection of

on

(define

similarly). Let

be the orthocenter of

respectively. From

so notice

we get

hence

are homothetic

is parallel to the Steiner line

of the complete quadrilateral

formed by

and
Let

be the pedal triangle of

WRT

Let

be the isotomic conjugate of

WRT

respectively. From

we get

and

are congruent and homothetic, so

is parallel to the Newton line of

hence
Let the perpendicular from

to

cuts the A-altitude of

at

and let

Since

so

Similarly, we can prove

so notice the intersection of

is the orthocenter of

we conclude that the intersection of

and

lies on the A-altitude of
From the proof above we get the following corollaries :
Corollary 3.1 :

is the cevian triangle of

WRT
Corollary 3.2 :

and

are congruent and homothetic.
____________________________________________________________
Property 4 :
Proof : Let

cuts

again at

and

be the projection of

on

Note that

(See here (Lemma at post #4) or here (Lemma)), so we get

Analogously, if

cuts

again at

and

is the projection of

on

then

Let

(on the A-altitude of
) be the intersection of

and

Let

be the point at infinity with direction

Since

so we conclude that

____________________________________________________________
Property 5 :

and

are cyclologic.
Proof : Let

be the second intersection of

and

Since

so

lies on

i.e.

are concurrent at
Analogously, we can prove

are concurrent at

____________________________________________________________
Property 6 : Let

Then

lie on

respectively.
Proof : It is well-known that
(
), so from Pappus's theorem for

are collinear. Similarly, we can prove

so

are collinear.

____________________________________________________________

Before stating property 7, we recall following two lemmas.
Lemma 1 : Given a hexagon

s.t.

Let

be the intersection of

and

be the intersection of

Then

Proof : Let

be the point s.t.

and

be the point s.t.

From

are collinear. Similarly, we can prove

are collinear.
Since

so notice

we get

Combining

we get
Lemma 2 (well-known) : Given two (not homothetic) triangles
. If

is a point s.t. the parallel from

to
, resp. are concurrent, then

lies on a circumconic of

or the line at infinity.
____________________________________________________________
Property 7 :

lie on a conic.
Proof : From Lemma 1

so from Lemma 2 we get the conclusion.
Link to the topic
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by henderson, Jun 4, 2016, 8:59 PM