Join our FREE webinar on May 1st to learn about managing anxiety.

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
Monochromatic bipartite subgraphs
L567   4
N 4 minutes ago by ihategeo_1969
Source: STEMS Mathematics 2023 Category B P6
For a positive integer $n$, let $f(n)$ denote the largest integer such that for any coloring of a $K_{n,n}$ with two colors, there exists a monochromatic subgraph of $K_{n,n}$ isomorphic to $K_{f(n), f(n)}$. Is it true that for each positive integer $m$ we can find a natural $N$ such that for any integer $n \geqslant N$, $f(n) \geqslant m$?

Proposed by Suchir
4 replies
L567
Jan 8, 2023
ihategeo_1969
4 minutes ago
Tilted Students Thoroughly Splash Tiger part 2
DottedCaculator   18
N 33 minutes ago by MathLuis
Source: ELMO 2024/5
In triangle $ABC$ with $AB<AC$ and $AB+AC=2BC$, let $M$ be the midpoint of $\overline{BC}$. Choose point $P$ on the extension of $\overline{BA}$ past $A$ and point $Q$ on segment $\overline{AC}$ such that $M$ lies on $\overline{PQ}$. Let $X$ be on the opposite side of $\overline{AB}$ from $C$ such that $\overline{AX} \parallel \overline{BC}$ and $AX=AP=AQ$. Let $\overline{BX}$ intersect the circumcircle of $BMQ$ again at $Y \neq B$, and let $\overline{CX}$ intersect the circumcircle of $CMP$ again at $Z \neq C$. Prove that $A$, $Y$, and $Z$ are collinear.

Tiger Zhang
18 replies
DottedCaculator
Jun 21, 2024
MathLuis
33 minutes ago
Find area!
ComplexPhi   4
N 37 minutes ago by TigerOnion
Let $O_1$ be a point in the exterior of the circle $\omega$ of center $O$ and radius $R$ , and let $O_1N$ , $O_1D$ be the tangent segments from $O_1$ to the circle. On the segment $O_1N$ consider the point $B$ such that $BN=R$ .Let the line from $B$ parallel to $ON$ intersect the segment $O_1D$ at $C$ . If $A$ is a point on the segment $O_1D$ other than $C$ so that $BC=BA=a$ , and if the incircle of the triangle $ABC$ has radius $r$ , then find the area of $\triangle ABC$ in terms of $a ,R ,r$.
4 replies
ComplexPhi
Feb 4, 2015
TigerOnion
37 minutes ago
Easy integer functional equation
MarkBcc168   93
N an hour ago by ray66
Source: APMO 2019 P1
Let $\mathbb{Z}^+$ be the set of positive integers. Determine all functions $f : \mathbb{Z}^+\to\mathbb{Z}^+$ such that $a^2+f(a)f(b)$ is divisible by $f(a)+b$ for all positive integers $a,b$.
93 replies
MarkBcc168
Jun 11, 2019
ray66
an hour ago
No more topics!
Functions
Potla   23
N Apr 25, 2025 by Ilikeminecraft
Source: 0
Find all functions $ f: \mathbb{R}\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that
\[f(x+y)+f(y+z)+f(z+x)\ge 3f(x+2y+3z)\]
for all $x, y, z \in \mathbb R$.
23 replies
Potla
Feb 21, 2009
Ilikeminecraft
Apr 25, 2025
Functions
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: 0
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Potla
1886 posts
#1 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, HWenslawski
Find all functions $ f: \mathbb{R}\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that
\[f(x+y)+f(y+z)+f(z+x)\ge 3f(x+2y+3z)\]
for all $x, y, z \in \mathbb R$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
arcsin1.01
27 posts
#2 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, HWenslawski
Hint 1
Hint 2
Big hint (do not open before you give up)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
addictedtomath
108 posts
#3 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, HWenslawski
solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
popcorn1
1098 posts
#4
Y by
$1 + 2 = 3$ again?!

The answer is $f(x)=c$ for all reals $c$; it's easy to see that these solutions work. Let $P(x,y,z)$ denote the given assertion.

Setting $P(x,0,0)$ gives $3f(x) \leq 2f(x) + f(0)$, so $f(x) \leq f(0)$ for all reals $x$. Setting $P(\frac{x}{2},\frac{x}{2},-\frac{x}{2})$ gives $3f(0) \leq 2f(0) + f(x)$, so $f(0) \leq f(x)$ for all reals $x$. Therefore $f(x) \leq f(0) \leq f(x)$, or $f$ is constant.

Remark. I really like this FE because both steps are motivated: you get the first from just doing stuff and you wonder, ``huh, how do I use the inequality?'' Then the solution is natural.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MrOreoJuice
594 posts
#5 • 2 Y
Y by Mango247, Mango247
Really cute :)
As usual let $P(x,y,z)$ denote the given assertion.
  • $P(x,0,0) \implies f(x) \le f(0)$ for all $x$.
  • $P\left( \dfrac{-3x}{2} , \dfrac{3x}{2} , \dfrac {-x}{2} \right) \implies 2f(0) \le f(-2x) + f(x)$ which is also $\le 2f(0) \implies f(-2x) + f(x) = 2f(0)$.
  • $P(-x , 2x , -x) \implies f(x) \ge f(0)$.
So $f(x) = c$ for constant $c$.

Edit: wait bruh how did I miss the more natural substitution shown above.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by MrOreoJuice, Sep 3, 2021, 10:21 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
jasperE3
11281 posts
#6
Y by
$P(x,0,0)\Rightarrow f(x)\le f(0)$
$P(x,x,-x)\Rightarrow f(2x)\ge f(0)\Rightarrow f(x)\ge f(0)\Rightarrow\boxed{f(x)=c}$ for some $c\in\mathbb R$, which works.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
554183
484 posts
#7
Y by
$P(y,y,-y) \implies f(2y)+f(0)+f(0) \geq 3f(0) \implies f(x) \geq f(0) \forall x$
$P(-y,y,-y) \implies f(0)+f(0)+f(-2y) \geq 3f(-2y) \implies f(0) \geq f(-2y) \implies f(0) \geq f(x) \forall x$
Therefore, $f(x)=c$ where $c$ is a constant for all $x$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8857 posts
#8
Y by
Only constant functions work.

Summing this inequality cyclically, $$f(x+2y+3z) + f(y+2z+3x)+f(z+2x+3y) \leq f(x+y) + f(y+z) + f(z+x).$$On the other hand, substituting $P(2x+y, 2y+z, 2z+x)$, we obtain exactly the reverse inequality. As a result, equality must hold everywhere. Now, setting $y=z=0$, $$3f(x) = f(x) + 2f(0) \implies f(x) = f(0)$$is constant, as needed.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by HamstPan38825, Mar 25, 2023, 2:15 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mogmog8
1080 posts
#9 • 1 Y
Y by centslordm
We claim the only solution is $f(x)=c$, where $c$ is a real constant. Note that this satisfies the given conditions. Let $P(x,y,z)$ denote the given assertion and $P(x,0,0)$ yields $f(x)\le f(0)$. Then, $P(-z,-z,z)$ yields $f(0)\le f(-2z)$ so $f(x)\ge f(0)$. Hence, $f(x)=f(0)$ so we are done. $\square$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
joshualiu315
2533 posts
#10
Y by
Plugging in $(x,y,z)=(x,0,0)$ to get

\[3f(x) \le 2f(x)+f(0)\]\[\implies f(x) \le f(0)\]
Plugging in $(x,y,z)=(x/2,x/2,-x/2)$ gives

\[3f(0) \le f(x)+2f(0)\]\[\implies f(x) \ge f(0)\]
Thus, $f(x)=f(0)$, so our answer is $\boxed{f(x)=c, \ c \in \mathbb{R}}$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
shendrew7
794 posts
#11
Y by
Substitute $(2k,0,0)$ and $(k,k-k)$ to find
\[f(2k) \leq f(0), \quad f(2k) \ge f(0).\]
Hence the constant $f(0)$ is the only value $f$ can take, so $\boxed{f(x) = c, \quad c \in \mathbb{R}}$, which evidently works. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
kamatadu
479 posts
#12
Y by
$f\equiv c$ for some constant $c$ is the solution.

$P(x,0,0) \implies 3f(x) \le f(x) + f(0) + f(x) \implies f(x) \le f(0)$.

$P(-x,-x,x) \implies 3f(-x + 2(-x) + 3x) \le f(-2x) + f(0) + f(0) \implies 3f(0) \le f(-2x) + 2f(0) \implies f(-2x) \ge f(0)$.
Now changing $-2x \rightarrow x$, we get that $f(x) \ge f(0)$.

Thus $f(x) = f(0)$. :yoda:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
dolphinday
1324 posts
#14
Y by
Letting $y = z = 0$ gives $f(x) \leq f(0)$.Then $z = -x = -y$ gives $3f(0) \leq f(2x) + 2f(0)$ so $f(0) \leq f(2x)$, which is only possible if $f(x) = f(0) = c$.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by dolphinday, Mar 6, 2024, 8:40 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
eibc
600 posts
#15
Y by
The answer is $f \equiv c$ for any real constant $c$, which works. Let $P(x, y, z)$ denote the given assertion. From $P(x, 0, 0)$ we have $3f(x) \le 2f(x) + f(0)$, so $f(x) \le f(0)$. From $P(\tfrac{x}{2}, \tfrac{x}{2}, -\tfrac{x}{2})$ we have $3f(0) \le f(x) + 2f(0)$, so $f(x) \ge f(0)$. Hence $f(x) = f(0)$ for all $x$, which implies the solution set.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pikapika007
298 posts
#16
Y by
The answer is $f(x) = c$ only - clearly this works. Now
\[ P(x, 0, 0) \implies 3f(x) \le 2f(x) + f(0) \implies f(x) \le f(0) \]so
\[ 3f(x+2y+3z) \le f(x+y) + f(y+z) + f(z+x) \le 3f(0). \]Now $P(a, a, -a)$ implies that
\[ 3f(0) \le f(2a) + 2f(0) \le 3f(0) \]so $f(0) \le f(a)$ for all $a$, and we're done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Jndd
1416 posts
#17
Y by
The answer is $f(x)=c$ for $c\in \mathbb{R}$, and it is easy to see that this satisfies our inequality.

Plugging in $y=z=0$, we get $3f(x)\leq 2f(x) + f(0)$, which gives $f(x)\leq f(0)$ for all $x$. Then, plugging in $x=y=-z$, we get $3f(0)\leq f(-2z)+2f(0)$, so $f(0)\leq f(-2z)$, giving $f(x)\geq f(0)$ for all $x$. Since $f(x)\geq f(0)\geq f(x)$ for all $x$, we must have $f(x)=f(0)$, as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Markas
105 posts
#18
Y by
Let y = z = 0. Now we plug that in and we get that $3f(x) \leq f(x) + f(0) + f(x)$ $\Rightarrow$ $f(x) \leq f(0)$. Now let x = -z and y = -z. After we plug that in, we get $3f(0) \leq f(-2z) + f(0) + f(0)$ $\Rightarrow$ $f(0) \leq f(-2z)$. By the two substitutions we did we get $f(x) \leq f(0) \leq f(-2z)$ and we can choose x = -2z $\Rightarrow$ we now have $f(x) \leq f(0) \leq f(x)$ $\Rightarrow$ $f(0) = f(x)$ $\Rightarrow$ f is constant. Now we only need to check this which is obviously true since $3c \leq c + c + c$. We are ready since we proved that $f(x) = c$ is the only solution and it works.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
balllightning37
388 posts
#19
Y by
Neat!

$P(x,0,0)$ implies $3f(x)\leq 2f(x)+f(0)$ or $f(x)\leq f(0)$ for all $x$.

Then, $P(x,x,-x)$ implies $3f(0)\leq f(x)+2f(0)$ or $f(0)\leq f(x)$ for all $x$. motivation

Combining, these two, we get that $f(x)=c$ for some constant $c$, which of course works.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AshAuktober
1000 posts
#20
Y by
Very kawaii, as expected from a Russian problem!
The only function that works is the constant function. It works as then the inequation becomes $3c \ge 3c$ which is true. We now prove it is the only such function.
Let $P(x, y, z)$ note the given assertion.

Claim 1: $f(x) \le f(0)$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$.
Proof: $P(x, 0, 0)$ $$\implies 2f(x) + f(0) \ge 3f(x) \implies f(x) \le f(0)$$as desired. $\square$

Claim 2: $f(x) \ge f(0)$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$.
Proof: $P\left(\frac x2, \frac x2, -\frac x2 \right)$ $$\implies 2f(0) + f(x) \ge 3f(0) \implies f(x) \ge f(0),$$as desired. $\square$

Combining the above two claims, $f(x) = f(0)$, and thus $f$ is indeed a constant function. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
eg4334
637 posts
#21
Y by
Let $x+y=a, y+z=b, x+z=c$ so it rewrites into $$f(a)+f(b)+f(c) \geq 3f(2b+c)$$. Set $b=0, a=c$ to get $2f(a)+f(0) \geq 3f(a) \implies f(0) \geq f(a)$ And then $b=c=0$ to get $f(a) \geq f(0)$. Therefore $f(a)=f(0)$ so $\boxed{f(x) \equiv c}$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
blueprimes
344 posts
#22
Y by
We claim the answer is $f(x) = c$ for a constant $c$. Obviously it works. Now the assertion $y = z = 0$ yields $f(x) \ge f(0)$ for all $x$, whereas $(x, y, z) \mapsto \left(\dfrac{x}{2}, \dfrac{x}{2}, - \dfrac{x}{2} \right)$ yields $f(x) \le f(0)$ for all $x$. So $f(x) = f(0)$ and $f$ is constant as wanted.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Marcus_Zhang
980 posts
#23
Y by
Almost a one liner
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Maximilian113
571 posts
#24
Y by
Let $P(x, y, z)$ denote the assertion. Then $$P(-x, -x, x) \implies 3f(0) \leq f(-2x)+2f(0) \implies f(x) \geq f(0) \, \forall x \in \mathbb R.$$Also, $$P(-x, x, -x) \implies 3f(-2x) \leq 2f(0)+f(-2x) \implies f(x) \leq f(0) \, \forall x \in \mathbb R.$$It follows that $f(x)=c$ for some constant $c,$ and this clearly satisfies the assertion.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ilikeminecraft
609 posts
#25
Y by
I claim that $f(x) = c$ for some constant $c\in\mathbb R$. This clearly works.

Plug in $x = y = -z$ to get that $f(0) \leq f(2x),$ and then $x = -y = z$ to get that $f(2x) \leq f(0).$ Thus, $f(x)$ is constant.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a