Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.

Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.

Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

AIME Problem Series A
Thursday, May 22 - Jul 31

AIME Problem Series B
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
May 1, 2025
0 replies
k i Peer-to-Peer Programs Forum
jwelsh   157
N Dec 11, 2023 by cw357
Many of our AoPS Community members share their knowledge with their peers in a variety of ways, ranging from creating mock contests to creating real contests to writing handouts to hosting sessions as part of our partnership with schoolhouse.world.

To facilitate students in these efforts, we have created a new Peer-to-Peer Programs forum. With the creation of this forum, we are starting a new process for those of you who want to advertise your efforts. These advertisements and ensuing discussions have been cluttering up some of the forums that were meant for other purposes, so we’re gathering these topics in one place. This also allows students to find new peer-to-peer learning opportunities without having to poke around all the other forums.

To announce your program, or to invite others to work with you on it, here’s what to do:

1) Post a new topic in the Peer-to-Peer Programs forum. This will be the discussion thread for your program.

2) Post a single brief post in this thread that links the discussion thread of your program in the Peer-to-Peer Programs forum.

Please note that we’ll move or delete any future advertisement posts that are outside the Peer-to-Peer Programs forum, as well as any posts in this topic that are not brief announcements of new opportunities. In particular, this topic should not be used to discuss specific programs; those discussions should occur in topics in the Peer-to-Peer Programs forum.

Your post in this thread should have what you're sharing (class, session, tutoring, handout, math or coding game/other program) and a link to the thread in the Peer-to-Peer Programs forum, which should have more information (like where to find what you're sharing).
157 replies
jwelsh
Mar 15, 2021
cw357
Dec 11, 2023
k i C&P posting recs by mods
v_Enhance   0
Jun 12, 2020
The purpose of this post is to lay out a few suggestions about what kind of posts work well for the C&P forum. Except in a few cases these are mostly meant to be "suggestions based on historical trends" rather than firm hard rules; we may eventually replace this with an actual list of firm rules but that requires admin approval :) That said, if you post something in the "discouraged" category, you should not be totally surprised if it gets locked; they are discouraged exactly because past experience shows they tend to go badly.
-----------------------------
1. Program discussion: Allowed
If you have questions about specific camps or programs (e.g. which classes are good at X camp?), these questions fit well here. Many camps/programs have specific sub-forums too but we understand a lot of them are not active.
-----------------------------
2. Results discussion: Allowed
You can make threads about e.g. how you did on contests (including AMC), though on AMC day when there is a lot of discussion. Moderators and administrators may do a lot of thread-merging / forum-wrangling to keep things in one place.
-----------------------------
3. Reposting solutions or questions to past AMC/AIME/USAMO problems: Allowed
This forum contains a post for nearly every problem from AMC8, AMC10, AMC12, AIME, USAJMO, USAMO (and these links give you an index of all these posts). It is always permitted to post a full solution to any problem in its own thread (linked above), regardless of how old the problem is, and even if this solution is similar to one that has already been posted. We encourage this type of posting because it is helpful for the user to explain their solution in full to an audience, and for future users who want to see multiple approaches to a problem or even just the frequency distribution of common approaches. We do ask for some explanation; if you just post "the answer is (B); ez" then you are not adding anything useful.

You are also encouraged to post questions about a specific problem in the specific thread for that problem, or about previous user's solutions. It's almost always better to use the existing thread than to start a new one, to keep all the discussion in one place easily searchable for future visitors.
-----------------------------
4. Advice posts: Allowed, but read below first
You can use this forum to ask for advice about how to prepare for math competitions in general. But you should be aware that this question has been asked many many times. Before making a post, you are encouraged to look at the following:
[list]
[*] Stop looking for the right training: A generic post about advice that keeps getting stickied :)
[*] There is an enormous list of links on the Wiki of books / problems / etc for all levels.
[/list]
When you do post, we really encourage you to be as specific as possible in your question. Tell us about your background, what you've tried already, etc.

Actually, the absolute best way to get a helpful response is to take a few examples of problems that you tried to solve but couldn't, and explain what you tried on them / why you couldn't solve them. Here is a great example of a specific question.
-----------------------------
5. Publicity: use P2P forum instead
See https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c5h2489297_peertopeer_programs_forum.
Some exceptions have been allowed in the past, but these require approval from administrators. (I am not totally sure what the criteria is. I am not an administrator.)
-----------------------------
6. Mock contests: use Mock Contests forum instead
Mock contests should be posted in the dedicated forum instead:
https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c594864_aops_mock_contests
-----------------------------
7. AMC procedural questions: suggest to contact the AMC HQ instead
If you have a question like "how do I submit a change of venue form for the AIME" or "why is my name not on the qualifiers list even though I have a 300 index", you would be better off calling or emailing the AMC program to ask, they are the ones who can help you :)
-----------------------------
8. Discussion of random math problems: suggest to use MSM/HSM/HSO instead
If you are discussing a specific math problem that isn't from the AMC/AIME/USAMO, it's better to post these in Middle School Math, High School Math, High School Olympiads instead.
-----------------------------
9. Politics: suggest to use Round Table instead
There are important conversations to be had about things like gender diversity in math contests, etc., for sure. However, from experience we think that C&P is historically not a good place to have these conversations, as they go off the rails very quickly. We encourage you to use the Round Table instead, where it is much more clear that all posts need to be serious.
-----------------------------
10. MAA complaints: discouraged
We don't want to pretend that the MAA is perfect or that we agree with everything they do. However, we chose to discourage this sort of behavior because in practice most of the comments we see are not useful and some are frankly offensive.
[list] [*] If you just want to blow off steam, do it on your blog instead.
[*] When you have criticism, it should be reasoned, well-thought and constructive. What we mean by this is, for example, when the AOIME was announced, there was great outrage about potential cheating. Well, do you really think that this is something the organizers didn't think about too? Simply posting that "people will cheat and steal my USAMOO qualification, the MAA are idiots!" is not helpful as it is not bringing any new information to the table.
[*] Even if you do have reasoned, well-thought, constructive criticism, we think it is actually better to email it the MAA instead, rather than post it here. Experience shows that even polite, well-meaning suggestions posted in C&P are often derailed by less mature users who insist on complaining about everything.
[/list]
-----------------------------
11. Memes and joke posts: discouraged
It's fine to make jokes or lighthearted posts every so often. But it should be done with discretion. Ideally, jokes should be done within a longer post that has other content. For example, in my response to one user's question about olympiad combinatorics, I used a silly picture of Sogiita Gunha, but it was done within a context of a much longer post where it was meant to actually make a point.

On the other hand, there are many threads which consist largely of posts whose only content is an attached meme with the word "MAA" in it. When done in excess like this, the jokes reflect poorly on the community, so we explicitly discourage them.
-----------------------------
12. Questions that no one can answer: discouraged
Examples of this: "will MIT ask for AOIME scores?", "what will the AIME 2021 cutoffs be (asked in 2020)", etc. Basically, if you ask a question on this forum, it's better if the question is something that a user can plausibly answer :)
-----------------------------
13. Blind speculation: discouraged
Along these lines, if you do see a question that you don't have an answer to, we discourage "blindly guessing" as it leads to spreading of baseless rumors. For example, if you see some user posting "why are there fewer qualifiers than usual this year?", you should not reply "the MAA must have been worried about online cheating so they took fewer people!!". Was sich überhaupt sagen lässt, lässt sich klar sagen; und wovon man nicht reden kann, darüber muss man schweigen.
-----------------------------
14. Discussion of cheating: strongly discouraged
If you have evidence or reasonable suspicion of cheating, please report this to your Competition Manager or to the AMC HQ; these forums cannot help you.
Otherwise, please avoid public discussion of cheating. That is: no discussion of methods of cheating, no speculation about how cheating affects cutoffs, and so on --- it is not helpful to anyone, and it creates a sour atmosphere. A longer explanation is given in Seriously, please stop discussing how to cheat.
-----------------------------
15. Cutoff jokes: never allowed
Whenever the cutoffs for any major contest are released, it is very obvious when they are official. In the past, this has been achieved by the numbers being posted on the official AMC website (here) or through a post from the AMCDirector account.

You must never post fake cutoffs, even as a joke. You should also refrain from posting cutoffs that you've heard of via email, etc., because it is better to wait for the obvious official announcement. A longer explanation is given in A Treatise on Cutoff Trolling.
-----------------------------
16. Meanness: never allowed
Being mean is worse than being immature and unproductive. If another user does something which you think is inappropriate, use the Report button to bring the post to moderator attention, or if you really must reply, do so in a way that is tactful and constructive rather than inflammatory.
-----------------------------

Finally, we remind you all to sit back and enjoy the problems. :D

-----------------------------
(EDIT 2024-09-13: AoPS has asked to me to add the following item.)

Advertising paid program or service: never allowed

Per the AoPS Terms of Service (rule 5h), general advertisements are not allowed.

While we do allow advertisements of official contests (at the MAA and MATHCOUNTS level) and those run by college students with at least one successful year, any and all advertisements of a paid service or program is not allowed and will be deleted.
0 replies
v_Enhance
Jun 12, 2020
0 replies
k i Stop looking for the "right" training
v_Enhance   50
N Oct 16, 2017 by blawho12
Source: Contest advice
EDIT 2019-02-01: https://blog.evanchen.cc/2019/01/31/math-contest-platitudes-v3/ is the updated version of this.

EDIT 2021-06-09: see also https://web.evanchen.cc/faq-contest.html.

Original 2013 post
50 replies
v_Enhance
Feb 15, 2013
blawho12
Oct 16, 2017
Geometry
Lukariman   10
N 4 minutes ago by Captainscrubz
Given circle (O) and point P outside (O). From P draw tangents PA and PB to (O) with contact points A, B. On the opposite ray of ray BP, take point M. The circle circumscribing triangle APM intersects (O) at the second point D. Let H be the projection of B on AM. Prove that $\angle HDM$ = 2∠AMP.
10 replies
Lukariman
Tuesday at 12:43 PM
Captainscrubz
4 minutes ago
Simple inequality
sqing   21
N an hour ago by Bexultan
Source: JBMO 2011 Shortlist A3
$\boxed{\text{A3}}$If $a,b$ be positive real numbers, show that:$$ \displaystyle{\sqrt{\dfrac{a^2+ab+b^2}{3}}+\sqrt{ab}\leq a+b}$$
21 replies
sqing
May 15, 2016
Bexultan
an hour ago
Primes p such that p and p^2+2p-8 are primes too
mhet49   44
N an hour ago by MITDragon
Source: Albanian National Math Olympiad 2012
Find all primes $p$ such that $p+2$ and $p^2+2p-8$ are also primes.
44 replies
mhet49
Apr 1, 2012
MITDragon
an hour ago
Integer polynomial w factorials
Solilin   1
N an hour ago by Tkn
Source: 9th Thailand MO
Let $a_1, a_2, ..., a_{2012}$ be pairwise distinct integers. Show that the equation $(x -a_1)(x - a_2)...(x - a_{2012}) = (1006!)^2$ has at most one integral solution.
1 reply
Solilin
Yesterday at 2:12 PM
Tkn
an hour ago
9 ARML Location
deduck   36
N 4 hours ago by idk12345678
UNR -> Nevada
St Anselm -> New Hampshire
PSU -> Pennsylvania
WCU -> North Carolina


Put your USERNAME in the list ONLY IF YOU WANT TO!!!! !!!!!

I'm going to UNR if anyone wants to meetup!!! :D

Current List:
Iowa
UNR
PSU
St Anselm
WCU
36 replies
deduck
Tuesday at 4:19 PM
idk12345678
4 hours ago
how prestigious is hsmc
ConfidentKoala4   3
N 5 hours ago by ConfidentKoala4
been wonderin this for a while

how prestigious is it? ik its not as good as mathily (they rejected me :mad: ) but Idk how good it actually is
3 replies
ConfidentKoala4
Today at 12:46 AM
ConfidentKoala4
5 hours ago
9 Does Mental Health Actually Matter?
heheman   9
N Today at 12:47 AM by maxamc
Looking at the goals I once had, it was all just so silly and stupid

I didn't even reach my "Low" goal for AIME... so pathetic

Missed JMO by a huge margin, after missing by only 12.5 points last year

(BTW i didn't slack off one bit)

I guess the most important thing is just to keep my head up and keep going. I can't let failures stop me. Honestly I don't care about setting goals anymore. They only give me a lot of internal pressure to do well. I think the most important thing is to focus on what I do everyday, consistently, and pay attention to the beautiful things in life (like math).

I'm going to try getting more involved in real life. After coming back from COVID, I had trouble to make as many friends with non-math people. But I was reconnecting with some of my friends that I had prepandemic and I realized how precious those friendships really were.

Now the last thing to do is grind my last bit of nonexistent ego to dust and focus on the present, stop looking back

(Note: This doesn't mean I'm going to quit, I just mean I'm going to do math on my own and try to not feel any pressure to do well. Cause i feel like that pressure really beat me a lot.)

I love this community and am happy for everyone who qualified olympiad but at this point competition math just reminds me only of my failures. (Even if it's my own fault.) So I'm probably going to take a break for a while. Thanks everyone for being nice to me and stuff. Sorry if this sounds cringe (it will in a week)

9 replies
heheman
Mar 8, 2024
maxamc
Today at 12:47 AM
HCSSiM results
SurvivingInEnglish   60
N Today at 12:32 AM by Vivaandax
Anyone already got results for HCSSiM? Are there any point in sending additional work if I applied on March 19?
60 replies
SurvivingInEnglish
Apr 5, 2024
Vivaandax
Today at 12:32 AM
Rational sequences
tenniskidperson3   57
N Yesterday at 10:25 PM by OronSH
Source: 2009 USAMO problem 6
Let $s_1, s_2, s_3, \dots$ be an infinite, nonconstant sequence of rational numbers, meaning it is not the case that $s_1 = s_2 = s_3 = \dots.$ Suppose that $t_1, t_2, t_3, \dots$ is also an infinite, nonconstant sequence of rational numbers with the property that $(s_i - s_j)(t_i - t_j)$ is an integer for all $i$ and $j$. Prove that there exists a rational number $r$ such that $(s_i - s_j)r$ and $(t_i - t_j)/r$ are integers for all $i$ and $j$.
57 replies
tenniskidperson3
Apr 30, 2009
OronSH
Yesterday at 10:25 PM
1:1 Physics Tutors
DinoDragon186   3
N Yesterday at 7:26 PM by talhee
I am looking for 1:1 physics tutor.
I am a beginner in physics and am in 9th grade.
I want to make it to IPhO in the coming years.
3 replies
DinoDragon186
Dec 10, 2024
talhee
Yesterday at 7:26 PM
Looking for Physics or USAPhO Tutor
physicsplease   4
N Yesterday at 7:20 PM by talhee
Hii I am looking for a USAPhO tutor for next year's season. I think I have tried literally everything possible to improve but I feel like I just hit a massive roadblock right now.

It would be ideal if I can find someone who have a lot of experience with physics olympiads. My goal is medal/gold in usapho next year, and I am very determined & willing to put in a lot of hours, especially more so in the summer. Please recommend anyone or dm in aops, thank you.

Have qualified usapho before (last year), took both physics c and sufficient higher math.
4 replies
physicsplease
Apr 11, 2025
talhee
Yesterday at 7:20 PM
MathILy 2025 Decisions Thread
mysterynotfound   40
N Yesterday at 4:11 PM by bjump
Discuss your decisions here!
also share any relevant details about your decisions if you want
40 replies
mysterynotfound
Apr 21, 2025
bjump
Yesterday at 4:11 PM
Mathcounts state
happymoose666   39
N Yesterday at 1:54 PM by Inaaya
Hi everyone,
I just have a question. I live in PA and I sadly didn't make it to nationals this year. Is PA a competitive state? I'm new into mathcounts and not sure
39 replies
happymoose666
Mar 24, 2025
Inaaya
Yesterday at 1:54 PM
force overlay inversion vibes
v4913   63
N Yesterday at 1:47 PM by starchan
Source: USAMO 2023/6
Let $ABC$ be a triangle with incenter $I$ and excenters $I_a$, $I_b$, and $I_c$ opposite $A$, $B$, and $C$, respectively. Let $D$ be an arbitrary point on the circumcircle of $\triangle{ABC}$ that does not lie on any of the lines $II_a$, $I_bI_c$, or $BC$. Suppose the circumcircles of $\triangle{DII_a}$ and $\triangle{DI_bI_c}$ intersect at two distinct points $D$ and $F$. If $E$ is the intersection of lines $DF$ and $BC$, prove that $\angle{BAD} = \angle{EAC}$.

Proposed by Zach Chroman
63 replies
v4913
Mar 23, 2023
starchan
Yesterday at 1:47 PM
Functional Inequality Implies Uniform Sign
peace09   31
N Apr 16, 2025 by Andyexists
Source: 2023 ISL A2
Let $\mathbb{R}$ be the set of real numbers. Let $f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ be a function such that \[f(x+y)f(x-y)\geqslant f(x)^2-f(y)^2\]for every $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume that the inequality is strict for some $x_0,y_0\in\mathbb{R}$.

Prove that either $f(x)\geqslant 0$ for every $x\in\mathbb{R}$ or $f(x)\leqslant 0$ for every $x\in\mathbb{R}$.
31 replies
peace09
Jul 17, 2024
Andyexists
Apr 16, 2025
Functional Inequality Implies Uniform Sign
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: 2023 ISL A2
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
peace09
5419 posts
#1 • 4 Y
Y by OronSH, MarkBcc168, Rounak_iitr, Sedro
Let $\mathbb{R}$ be the set of real numbers. Let $f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ be a function such that \[f(x+y)f(x-y)\geqslant f(x)^2-f(y)^2\]for every $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume that the inequality is strict for some $x_0,y_0\in\mathbb{R}$.

Prove that either $f(x)\geqslant 0$ for every $x\in\mathbb{R}$ or $f(x)\leqslant 0$ for every $x\in\mathbb{R}$.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by peace09, Jul 17, 2024, 12:27 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
peace09
5419 posts
#2 • 3 Y
Y by OronSH, Sedro, TensorGuy666
First, letting $y=x$ gives $f(0)f(2x)\ge0$, which implies the result unless $f(0)=0$; henceforth suppose so.

Next, letting $y=-x$ produces $0\ge f(x)^2-f(-x)^2$ or $f(x)^2\le f(-x)^2$; but swapping $x\mapsto-x$ analogously yields $f(-x)^2\le f(x)^2$, and so $f(x)^2=f(-x)^2~(\ast)$.

Then, letting $(x,y)=(x,y),(y,x)$ gives
\begin{align*}
        f(x+y)f(x-y)&\ge f(x)^2-f(y)^2\\
        f(y+x)f(y-x)&\ge f(y)^2-f(x)^2,
    \end{align*}and chaining the $1^\text{st}$ inequality with the negation of the $2^\text{nd}$ produces
\begin{align*}
        f(x+y)f(x-y)\ge-f(x+y)f(y-x)\\
        \iff f(w)f(z)\ge-f(w)f(-z),~(\dagger)
    \end{align*}where in the last step we only redenote $(x+y,x-y)\mapsto(w,z)$ for simplicity.

Now, it is given that $(\dagger)$ is strict for some $(\tilde{w},\tilde{z})$: \[f(\tilde{w})f(\tilde{z})>-f(\tilde{w})f(-\tilde{z}).\]But $(\ast)$ implies that the magnitudes of both sides are equal, and so both $f(\tilde{w})f(\tilde{z})$ and $f(\tilde{w})f(-\tilde{z})$ are strictly positive. In particular, $f(\tilde{z})=f(-\tilde{z})\neq0$.

Finally, letting $z=\tilde{z}$ in $(\dagger)$ yields $f(w)f(\tilde{z})\ge-f(w)f(-\tilde{z})=-f(w)f(\tilde{z})$, i.e., each $f(w)$ has the same sign as $f(\tilde{z})$. $\square$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
OronSH
1733 posts
#3 • 1 Y
Y by peace09
Call the assertion $P(x,y).$ If $P(a,b)$ is strict, then $P(a,b)+P(b,a)$ gives $f(a+b)(f(a-b)+f(b-a))>0,$ so $f(a-b)+f(b-a)\ne 0.$

Now $P\left(\frac{x+a-b}2,\frac{x-a+b}2\right)+P\left(\frac{x-a+b}2,\frac{x+a-b}2\right)$ gives $f(x)(f(a-b)+f(b-a))\ge 0.$ If $f(a-b)+f(b-a)>0$ then $f(x)\ge 0$ for all $x,$and if $f(a-b)+f(b-a)<0$ then $f(x)\le 0$ for all $x.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Anzoteh
126 posts
#4 • 20 Y
Y by OronSH, peace09, ehuseyinyigit, kamatadu, navi_09220114, pingupignu, Seicchi28, avisioner, Supertinito, BlazingMuddy, Sedro, CaptainLevi16, SatisfiedMagma, Aryan-23, EpicBird08, alexanderhamilton124, NicoN9, CyclicISLscelesTrapezoid, aidan0626, MS_asdfgzxcvb
I am the first proposer of this problem :) Co-authored with Ivan Chan (who proposed IMO 2023 P3 which imho a lot better than this), and Tristan Chaang (who was the first to supplya clean and neat solution; the original solution by Ivan and me made it looked like it's an A5).

I originally thought of the problem with sign flipped, i.e. $f(x + y) f(x - y) \le f(x)^2 - f(y)^2$, and then realized that leads to equality (i.e. no room on what to do). Then I decided to try the other direction and took me a while to notice the fact that became the problem statement!

Unfortunately I can't further characterize such functions. (What happens if we have $f(x + y) f(x - y) = f(x)^2 - f(y)^2$ and $f(x_0), f(y_0)$ different signs? How about the case where $f(x + y) f(x - y) > f(x)^2 - f(y)^2$ for all $x, y$? Those characterization seems elusive. )
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Anzoteh, Jul 17, 2024, 12:12 PM
Reason: Typo
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
kamatadu
480 posts
#5 • 1 Y
Y by SilverBlaze_SY
Thanks to Sammy27 for pointing out the point-wise trap in my previous (fake-)solution :ninja: . Here is the previous solution if anyone wants. incorrect solution

Here is the corrected solution.


Let $P(x,y)$ denote the assertion.

$P(x,x)\implies f(2x)f(0) \ge 0$.

Now if $f(0) \neq 0 $, then we can just divide both sides by $f(0)$ and switch $x \mapsto \frac{x}{2}$ to get that $f(x) \ge 0$ or $f(x) \le 0$ for all $x$.

Otherwise, assume $f(0) = 0$.

$P(x,-x) \implies 0 \ge f(x)^2 - f(-x)^2 \implies f(-x)^2 \ge f(x)^2$.

Now switching $x \mapsto -x$ in the above inequality, we get that $f(x)^2 \ge f(-x)^2$. Adding these two up, we get $f(-x)^2 + f(x)^2 \ge f(x)^2 + f(-x)^2$ which forces that equality holds in both the cases, i.e., $f(x)^2 = f(-x)^2$ for all $x$.

\[
P(x,y) \implies f(x+y)f(x-y) \ge f(x)^2 - f(y)^2.
\]\[
P(-y,x) \implies f(-y + x)f(-y-x) \ge f(-y)^2 - f(x)^2 = f(y)^2 - f(x)^2.
\]Adding these two up, we get that,
\[
f(x-y)(f(x+y) + f(-(x+y))) \ge 0
.\]
Now we substitute $x \mapsto \frac{p+q}{2}$ and $y \mapsto \frac{q-p}{2}$ to get,
\[
f(p)(f(q) + f(-q)) \ge 0
.\]
Now if $f(q)+f(-q) \neq 0$ for some $q$, then we are basically done. FTSOC assume that $f(q) = -f(-q)$ for all $q$, i.e., $f$ is odd.

Then,
\[
P(x,y) \implies f(x+y)f(x-y) \ge f(x)^2 - f(y)^2
.\]
\[
P(y,x) \implies f(y+x)f(y-x) \ge f(y)^2 - f(x)^2 \implies -f(x+y)f(x-y) \ge f(y)^2 - f(x)^2
.\]
Adding these two, we get that $0\ge 0$ which forces the equality of both the equations, that is
\[
f(x+y)f(x-y) = f(x)^2 - f(y)^2
\]for all $x$, $y$. But this is a contradiction because for $(x_0,y_0)$ the equality fails and we are done.



Can someone clarify what the $\gg$ means?

@below, thanks :thumbup:
This post has been edited 7 times. Last edited by kamatadu, Jul 18, 2024, 2:15 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
peace09
5419 posts
#6
Y by
kamatadu wrote:
Can someone clarify what the $\gg$ means? I have a solution that seems to be pretty weird :maybe: . Will be posting soon.
Sorry, I meant $\geqslant$, non-strict inequality.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
OptimalFEian
10 posts
#7
Y by
Let $P(x, y)$ denote the given assertion. First, $P(x/2, x/2)$ gives $f(x)f(0) \geq 0$ for all $x$. Thus, we are done if $f(0) \neq 0$. Now, assume $f(0) = 0$. Then, $P(x, -x)$ and $P(-x, x)$ give
\[f(-x)^2 \geq f(x)^2 \geq f(-x)^2 \implies f(x)^2 = f(-x)^2 \enspace \forall x \in \mathbb{R}.\]We have
\begin{align*}
		P(\frac{x+y}{2}, \frac{x-y}{2}): f(x)f(y) \geq f\left(\frac{x+y}{2} \right)^2 - f\left(\frac{x-y}{2} \right)^2
	\end{align*}for all $x, y \in \mathbb{R}$, and denote this by $Q(x, y)$. Suppose $f(-a) = -f(a)$ for some $a$. Then $Q(x, a)$ and $Q(x, -a)$ yield
\begin{align*}
		f(x)f(-a) =f\left(\frac{x-a}{2} \right)^2 - f\left(\frac{x+a}{2} \right)^2 \enspace \forall x \in \mathbb{R}.
	\end{align*}Again, replacing $x$ by $-x$ gives $f(-x) f(-a) = -f(x)f(-a)$. It follows that $f(-x) = -f(x)$ for all real $x$, assuming that $f(a) \neq 0$. Then, for any $x, y \in \mathbb{R}$,
\begin{align*}
		f(y+x)f(y-x)\geq f(y)^2 - f(x)^2 \geq -f(x+y)f(x-y)=f(x+y)f(y-x)
	\end{align*}which forces $P(x, y)$ to be the equality, contradicting the hypothesis.
Hence, we now have $f(-x) = f(x)$ for all $x$. It follows that
\begin{align*}
		f(x)f(-y) \geq f\left(\frac{x-y}{2} \right)^2 - f\left(\frac{x+y}{2} \right)^2 \geq -f(x)f(y).
	\end{align*}That is, $f(x)f(y) \geq 0$ for all real $x, y$. Now, the conclusion follows.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Marinchoo
407 posts
#8 • 1 Y
Y by isomoBela
Denote by $P(x,y)$ the assertion of $(x,y)$ into the functional equation. Combining the strict $P(x_0, y_0)$ and $P(y_0, x_0)$, we get:
\begin{align*}
    f(x_0+y_0)f(x_0-y_0)&>f(x_0)^2-f(y_0)^2 \\
    f(x_0+y_0)f(y_0-x_0)&\geq f(y_0)^2-f(x_0)^2 \\
    \Longrightarrow f(x_0+y_0)\cdot (f(x_0-y_0)+f(y_0-x_0)) &> 0.
\end{align*}Note that $f$ works iff $-f$ does, so WLOG $f(s)+f(-s)>0$ where $s = x_0-y_0$. Summing $P(x+s,x)$ and $P(x,x+s)$ now shows $f$ is non-negative, as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ihatemath123
3446 posts
#9 • 1 Y
Y by TensorGuy666
Let $(a,b)$ be a pair that makes the inequality strict. Plugging in the pairs $(a,b)$ and $(b,a)$ and summing gives us
\[ f(a+b) [ f(a-b) + f(b-a) ] > 0 \implies f(a-b)+f(b-a) \neq 0.\]Let $k$ be any constant; plugging in the pairs $(a+k, b+k)$ and $(b+k, a+k)$ and summing gives us
\[ f(a+b+2k) [ f(a-b) + f(b-a) ] \geq 0 \implies \text{sgn} (f(a+b+2k)) = \text{sgn} (f(a-b)+f(b-a))\]Since $k$ varies, $a+b+2k$ can be any real number, so we're done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sami1618
907 posts
#10
Y by
We will prove the converse that $f$ achieving both signs implies that the inequality is an equality.

Claim: $f(a)$ and $f(-a)$ are of different signs (if they are not both zero)
Let $b$ be such that $f(a)$ and $f(b)$ have different signs. Then choose $x$ and $y$ such that $x+y=b$ and $x-y=a$. Then $P(x,y)$ gives that $0>f(x)^2-f(y)^2$ so $P(y,x)$ gives that $f(b)f(-a)$ must be positive, as desired.
Claim: $f(0)=0$
If $f(0)\neq 0$ then $P(x,x)$ would contradict our assumption.
Claim: $f(a)=-f(-a)$
Compare $P(a,-a)$ and $P(-a,a)$.

To finish comparing $P(x,y)$ and $P(y,x)$ shows that the inequality must be an equality.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
dkedu
180 posts
#11
Y by
Let $P(x,y)$ denote the assertion.

Rewrite the condition as
\[-f(x+y)f(y-x) \le f(x)^2 - f(y)^2 \le f(x+y)f(x-y)\]\[-f(x+y)f(y-x) \le f(x+y)f(x-y)\]
Case 1: If there is $r$ such that $f(r) = f(-r) \neq 0$, then we have that by $P(\frac{n+r}{2},\frac{n-r}{2})$, which gives that $-f(n)f(-r) \le f(n)f(r)$ which implies that $f(n)$ has the same sign as $f(r)$ which implies $f(x) \le 0$ or $f(x) \ge 0$.

Case 2: If $f(x) = -f(-x)$ for all $x \in \mathbb R$, then we get that $f(x)^2 - f(y)^2 = f(x+y)f(x-y)$ so the inequality is never strict.

Having exhausted all cases, we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Sammy27
82 posts
#12 • 1 Y
Y by Eka01
Let $P(x, y)$ denote the assertion
$$f(x+y)f(x-y)\geq f(x)^2-f(y)^2.$$
  • $P(x_0,y_0)$ and $P(y_0, x_0)$ give
    $$f(x_0+y_0)f(x_0-y_0)> f(x_0)^2-f(y_0)^2$$and
    $$f(x_0+y_0)f(y_0-x_0)\geq f(y_0)^2-f(x_0)^2,$$respectively. We add them to get
    $$f(x_0+y_0)(f(x_0-y_0)+f(y_0-x_0))>0\implies f(x_0-y_0)+f(y_0-x_0)\neq 0.$$
  • $P\left(\frac{x+x_0-y_0}{2}, \frac{x+y_0-x_0}{2}\right)$ and $P\left(\frac{x+y_0-x_0}{2}, \frac{x+x_0-y_0}{2}\right)$ give
    $$f(x)f(x_0-y_0)\geq f\left(\frac{x+x_0-y_0}{2}\right)^2-f\left(\frac{x+y_0-x_0}{2}\right)^2$$and
    $$f(x)f(y_0-x_0)\geq f\left(\frac{x+y_0-x_0}{2}\right)^2-f\left(\frac{x+x_0-y_0}{2}\right)^2,$$respectively. We add them to get
    $$f(x)(f(x_0-y_0)+f(y_0-x_0))\geq 0,$$so
    $$f(x_0-y_0)+f(y_0-x_0)>0 \implies f(x)\geq 0$$or
    $$f(x_0-y_0)+f(y_0-x_0)<0 \implies f(x)\leq 0$$for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$ as desired, and we are done. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Sammy27, Jul 18, 2024, 5:01 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
crocodilepradita
145 posts
#13
Y by
Let $P(x,y)$ be the assertion of $f(x+y)f(x-y)\ge f(x)^2-f(y)^2$.

$P(x_0,y_0) \implies f(x_0+y_0)f(x_0-y_0)>f(x_0)^2-f(y_0)^2$
$P(y_0,x_0) \implies f(x_0+y_0)f(y_0-x_0)\ge f(y_0)^2-f(x_0)^2$

Adding those $2$ inequality yields :
$f(x_0+y_0)[f(x_0-y_0)+f(y_0-x_0)]>0$ ...$(1)$

Claim 1. If $f(0)=0$ then $f(x)^2=f(-x)^2$ for all $x\in \mathbb{R}$
Proof.
Using $P(x,x)$ we get $f(2x)f(0)\ge 0$.
1) If $f(0)>0$ thus $f(2x)\ge 0 \implies f(x)\ge 0$ for all $x\in \mathbb{R}$.
2) If $f(0)<0 $ thus $f(2x)\le 0 \implies f(x) \le 0$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$.
3) If $f(0)=0$ then
$P(x,-x) \implies f(x)^2\le f(-x)^2$
$P(-x,x) \implies f(x)^2\ge f(-x)^2$
Therefore, $f(x)^2=f(-x)^2 ,\forall x \in \mathbb{R}$. $\square$

By substituting $x \to x_0-y_0$ we have
$f(x_0-y_0)^2=f(y_0-x_0)^2$
Therefore, $f(x_0-y_0)=f(y_0-x_0)$ or $f(x_0-y_0)=-f(y_0-x_0)$.

Now, consider inequality $(1)$.

If $f(x_0-y_0)=-f(y_0-x_0) \implies 0>0$, contradiction. Therefore, $f(x_0-y_0)=f(y_0-x_0)$.

Claim 2. If there exist $a\in \mathbb{R}$ such that $f(a)=f(-a)\neq 0$, then $f(x)\ge 0$ or $f(x)\le 0$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$
Proof.
$P(\frac{a+b}{2},\frac{a-b}{2}) \implies f(a)f(b)\ge f(\frac{a+b}{2})^2-f(\frac{a-b}{2})^2$
$P(\frac{-a+b}{2},\frac{-a-b}{2}) \implies f(-a)f(b) \ge f(\frac{b-a}{2})^2-f(\frac{-a-b}{2})^2=f(\frac{a-b}{2})^2-f(\frac{a+b}{2})^2$
Adding those $2$ inequality yields :
$f(b)[f(a)+f(-a)]\ge 0$

Now, if $f(a)=f(-a)>0$ then $f(b)\ge 0, \forall b \in \mathbb{R} \implies f(x)\ge 0, \forall x \in \mathbb{R} $. If $f(a)=f(-a)<0$ then $f(b)\le 0, \forall b \in \mathbb{R} \implies f(x)\le 0, \forall x \in \mathbb{R}$. $\square$

Now, consider the information $f(x_0-y_0)=f(y_0-x_0)$. We claim that $f(x_0-y_0)=f(y_0-x_0)\neq 0$.

Assume $f(x_0-y_0)=f(y_0-x_0)=0$.

$P(x_0,y_0) \implies f(x_0)^2 < f(y_0)^2$
$P(y_0,x_0) \implies f(x_0) \ge f(y_0)^2$
Contradiction. Therefore $f(x_0-y_0)=f(y_0-x_0)\neq 0$.

Therefore, there exist $a=x_0-y_0$ such that $f(a)=f(-a)\neq 0$. Using Claim $2$, we are finished. Done. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 5 times. Last edited by crocodilepradita, Jul 18, 2024, 12:59 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
YaoAOPS
1540 posts
#14
Y by
Guess who didn't know what strict meant.


Note that if $f$ is a solution then $c \cdot f$ is a solution. As such, WLOG scale such that $f(1) = 1$.
Denote the assertion with $P(x, y)$. By $P(x, x)$ we get that $f(2x)f(0) \ge 0$ which finishes if $f(0) \ne 0$, so assume $f(0) = 0$.
Now, by $P(x, -x)$ we get that \[ 0 \ge f(x)^2 - f(-x)^2 \]Comparing with $P(-x, x)$, we get that $f(x)^2 = f(-x)^2$.

Claim: $f$ is either even or odd.
Proof. Suppose that $f(a) = f(-a) \ne 0, f(b) = -f(-b) \ne 0$. Then set $x + y = a, x - y = b$. Now $P(x, y), P(-x, -y)$ have LHS with opposite signs so $f(x)^2 - f(y)^2 \le 0$. By comparing $P(y, x), P(-y, -x)$ we get $f(y)^2 - f(x)^2 \le 0$ as well.
As such, $f(x)^2 = f(y)^2$ and thus $f(a)f(b) \ge 0, f(-a)f(-b) \ge 0$, contradiction. $\blacksquare$
First suppose $f$ is odd. Note that by $P(y, x)$ we have that $f(x + y)f(y - x) \ge f(y)^2 - f(x)^2$. Since $f(x + y)f(y - x) = -f(x + y)f(y - x) \le -(f(x)^2 - f(y)^2)$ it follows that equality must hold for all $x, y$, contradiction.
Thus, $f$ is even. Take $x_0, y_0$ such that $f(x_0 + y_0)f(x_0 - y_0) > f(x_0)^2 - f(y_0)^2$.
Now, suppose $f(a)$ has a negative sign. Then take $x + y = a, x - y = 1$.
We then get that \[ f(a) \ge f(x)^2 - f(y)^2 \]By $P(y, x)$, we also get \[ f(a) \le f(x)^2 - f(y)^2 \]This gives a contradiction.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ericxyzhu
49 posts
#15 • 2 Y
Y by BlazingMuddy, Anzoteh
Anzoteh wrote:
Unfortunately I can't further characterize such functions. (What happens if we have $f(x + y) f(x - y) = f(x)^2 - f(y)^2$ and $f(x_0), f(y_0)$ different signs? How about the case where $f(x + y) f(x - y) > f(x)^2 - f(y)^2$ for all $x, y$? Those characterization seems elusive. )

The problem with the sign being equal was actually already an existing problem from IMOR 2018, proposed by Nuno Arala and Miguel Moreira from Portugal. https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h1673292p10651933
And yes there are unexpected extraneous solutions.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by ericxyzhu, Jul 18, 2024, 5:07 AM
Reason: Typo
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
megarnie
5606 posts
#17
Y by
Let $P(x,y)$ denote the given assertion. Suppose that the result was not true and choose reals $a,b$ such that $f(a) < 0$ and $f(b) > 0$. Additionally, choose $c,d$ such that $f(c+d) f(c-d) > f(c)^2 - f(d)^2$.

Claim: $f(0) = 0$
Proof: Suppose otherwise.

$P(x,x): f(2x) f(0) \ge 0$. However, choosing $x = \frac{a}{2}$ implies that $f(a) f(0) \ge 0$, so $f(0) < 0$, but $x = \frac b2$ implies that $f(b) f(0) \ge 0$, so $f(0) > 0$, absurd. Thus, $f(0)$ must equal $0$. $\square$


$P(x,-x): 0 \ge f(x)^2 - f(-x)^2$. But $P(-x,x)$ gives $0\ge f(-x)^2 - f(x)^2$, so this means $f(x)^2 = f(-x)^2$, so either $f(x) = f(-x)$ or $f(x) = -f(-x)$.

Claim: $f(c-d) \ne -f(d-c)$
Proof: Suppose that $f(c-d) = -f(d-c)$. Notice that $f(c+d) f(c-d) > f(c)^2 - f(d)^2$ and $P(d, c)$ gives that $f(c+d)f(d-c) \ge f(d)^2 - f(c)^2$. Now, taking the negative of both sides and flipping the inequality gives that $f(c+d) f(c-d) \le f(c)^2  - f(d)^2$, absurd. $\square$

This implies that $f(c-d) = f(d-c)$.

$P \left( \frac{x + c - d}{2}, \frac{x - (c - d) }{2} \right): f(x) f(c-d) \ge f \left( \frac{x + c - d}{2} \right)^2 - f\left( \frac{x - (c-d)}{2} \right)^2 $

$P \left( \frac{x - (c - d)}{2} , \frac{x + c + d}{2} \right): f(x) f(d-c) = f(x) f(c-d)  \ge f\left( \frac{x - (c-d)}{2} \right)^2  -  f \left( \frac{x + c - d}{2} \right)^2$.

This implies if $k = f \left( \frac{x + c - d}{2} \right)^2 - f\left( \frac{x - (c-d)}{2} \right)^2$, then $f(x) f(c-d) \ge k$ and $f(x) f(c-d) \ge -k$, so $f(x) f(c-d) \ge 0$. However, if $f(c-d) = 0$, then $f(d-c) = 0$, contradiction to our claim that $f(c-d) \ne -f(d-c)$. Therefore, $f(c-d) \ne 0$, choosing $x\in \{a,b\}$ such that $f(x)$ and $f(c-d)$ have opposite signs gives that $f(x) f(c-d) < 0$, contradiction.

Hence we must have $f(x) \ge 0$ always or $f(x) \le 0$ always.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by megarnie, Jul 19, 2024, 10:14 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
VicKmath7
1389 posts
#18
Y by
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
SomeonesPenguin
128 posts
#19 • 1 Y
Y by zzSpartan
Interesting FE. :roll:

Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
SatisfiedMagma
458 posts
#20 • 2 Y
Y by Funcshun840, H_Taken
Okay retirement days are kinda interesting. I thought I forgot to flip the sign of the inequality somewhere and fakesolved. Turns out I was right all along! Here's a solution which should be right I think.

Solution: Denote $P(x,y)$ as the assertion to the inequality. With the usual swapping trick, consider $P(x,y)$ and $P(y,x)$. This will yield the following two inequalities.
\begin{align*}
f(x+y)f(x-y) &\ge f(x)^2 - f(y)^2 \\
f(x+y)f(y-x) &\ge f(y)^2 - f(x)^2
\end{align*}Add them up and write $y = x + a$ for some arbitrary real $a$.
\[f(2x+a) \left(f(-a) + f(a) \right) \ge 0.\]If $f$ is not an odd function, then we can find some $a_0 \in \mathbb{R}$ such that $f(a_0) + f(-a_0) \ne 0$. Then dividing the above inequality by $\left(f(a_0) + f(-a_0)\right)$ with an appropriate change in sign of inequality, we would be done. Henceforth assume $f$ is an odd function.

Since $f$ is odd, $f(x-y) = -f(y-x)$. From the above aligned equations, we can now say that
\[f(x+y)f(x-y) = f(x)^2 - f(y)^2 \]for all $x,y \in \mathbb{R}$ which is the desired contradiction since there exists some $x_0,y_0 \in \mathbb{R}$ such that there is strict inequality in $P(x,y)$. This completes the solution. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by SatisfiedMagma, Aug 21, 2024, 2:28 AM
Reason: simple sign mistake, fixed!
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sansgankrsngupta
143 posts
#21
Y by
OG, Let $P(x,y)$ denote the given assertion.
$P(x,x) \implies$ $f(2x)f(0) \geq 0.$ If $f(0)$ is not 0, then the problem statement is directly implied, Hence, suppose $f(0)=0$
$P(x,-x) \implies$ $(f(x))^2 \geq (f(-x))^2$, replacing $x$ by $-x$ $\implies$ $(f(x))^2 \leq (f(-x))^2$. Thus, $(f(x))^2 =(f(-x))^2$ $\implies$ $f(x)= f(-x) or -f(-x)$. Now, Note that the problem condition can be translated to $f(x)f(y) \geq (f(\frac{x+y}{2}))^2-(f(\frac{x-y}{2}))^2$ for every $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$
Claim: $f(x)=f(-x)$ for all real $x$
Assume a real number $z /neq 0$(as $f(0)=0$) exists such that $f(z)=-f(-z)$.
Choose $x$ and $y$ such that and $x-y=z$
$P(x,y) \implies$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by sansgankrsngupta, Sep 13, 2024, 11:15 AM
Reason: -
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
N3bula
270 posts
#22
Y by
Let $P(x, y)$ denote the assertion.
\[P(x_0, y_0)+P(y_0, x_0)\]\[f(x_0+y_0)(f(x_0-y_0)+f(y_0-x_0))>0\]Let $s=x_0-y_0$.
\[P(x, x+s)+P(x+s, x)\]\[f(2x+s)(f(s)+f(-s))\geq 0\]Thus for all $x$ we have the desired result as $(f(s)+f(-s))>0$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
bobthesmartypants
4337 posts
#23
Y by
Clearly $f$ is not identically 0; since $f$ satisfies the FE iff $-f$ satisfies the FE, WLOG let $f(1)>0$, and denote the FE as $P(x, y)$.

$P(x/2, x/2)\implies f(x)f(0) \ge 0$, so either $f(x)\ge 0$ in which we're done, or $f(0)=0$.

$P(x, -x)\implies 0 \ge f(x)^2-f(-x)^2\implies f(x)^2\le f(-x)^2$. But $f(-x)^2\le f(x)^2$ as well so $|f(x)|=|f(-x)|\quad (*)$.

$P(x, y) + P(y, x)\implies f(x+y)(f(x-y) + f(y-x))\ge 0$, and if we choose such that $x+y=1$ and $x-y=z \in \mathbb{R}$, then $f(z)+f(-z)\ge 0$ for all $z\in \mathbb{R}$, which by $(*)$ implies $f(z)\ge 0$ or $-f(z)=f(-z)\ne 0$. Let the set of all $z$ that satisfy the latter be $N$; note that if $|N|=0$ we're done.

Note that if $x-y$ satisfies $-f(x-y)=f(y-x)$, then $f(x+y)f(x-y) = -f(x+y)f(y-x)\ge f(x)^2-f(y)^2\implies f(x+y)f(y-x)\le f(y)^2-f(x)^2$. But $P(y, x) \implies f(x+y)f(y-x)\ge f(y)^2-f(x)^2$ already so $f(x+y)f(y-x)=f(y)^2-f(x)^2$. But substituting $(x, y) \to (-x, -y)$, we similarly get $f(-x-y)f(x-y) = f(y)^2-f(x)^2\implies f(-x-y)f(y-x) = f(x)^2-f(y)^2\quad (**)$. If we choose to further specify that $x-y\in N$, adding with the previous equality, gives $$(f(x+y)+f(-x-y))f(y-x) = 0\implies -f(x+y)=f(-(x+y))$$as $f(y-x) \ne 0$. Thus, if $|N|>0$, then $f(x)=-f(x)$ for all $x\in \mathbb{R}$.

This finally gives a contradiction as this would imply, by $(**)$, that $f(-x-y)f(y-x)=f(x)^2-f(y)^2$ for all $x, y\in \mathbb{R}$; yet the problem statement says there should exist $x_0, y_0$ for which this is not true. Thus, $|N|=0$ and we conclude $f(z)\ge 0$ for all $z\in \mathbb{R}$. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
poirasss
1 post
#26 • 1 Y
Y by bin_sherlo
Putting $y=x$ gives us $f(2x)f(0) \geq 0 $. This gives $f(0)=0$, if not, then for all $x$, the sign of $f(x)$ doesn't change.
Then setting $x=-y$ gives $0\geq f(-y)^2-f(y)^2$, changing $y$ with $ -y$ gives us $f(y)^2\geq f(-y)^2\geq f(y)^2$, which implies $|f(x)|=|f(-x)|$ and $f(x)^2=f(-x)^2$.
Then swapping $-x$ as $x$ gives $f(y-x)f(-x-y)\geq f(x)^2-f(y)^2$ .
Swapping $x$ and $y$ gives $f(x-y)f(-x-y)\geq f(y)^2-f(x)^2$ which means $f(x)^2-f(y)^2\geq -f(x-y)f(-x-y)$.

Assume $f(a)>0>f(b)$. Choose $x$ and $y$ as $x-y=a$, $x+y=c$, where c is any real number.
$f(x+y)f(x-y)\geq f(x)^2-f(y)^2\geq -f(x-y)f(-x-y)$
$\Rightarrow f(c)f(a) \geq -f(a)f(-c)$
$\Rightarrow f(c) \geq -f(-c)$ Putting $-c$ as $c$ gives $f(c) \geq -f(-c) \geq f(c)$ which implies $f(c)=-f(-c)$.
It is given that $f(x_0+y_0)f(x_0-y_0)>f(x_0)^2-f(y_0)^2$ , $f(y_0+x_0)f(y_0-x_0)\geq f(y_0)^2-f(x_0)^2$.
So, $f(x_0+y_0)f(x_0-y_0)>f(x_0)^2-f(y_0)^2 \geq f(x_0+y_0)f(x_0+y_0)$, which gives us contradiction. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
InterLoop
280 posts
#27
Y by
kawaii
solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8860 posts
#28
Y by
By setting $x=y$, $f(2x)f(0) \geq 0$. Thus, if $f(0) \neq 0$, we may assume without loss of generality that $f(0) > 0$, from where $f(2x) \geq 0$ for all real numbers $x$, so the desired result is true.

If $f(0) = 0$, then \[f(x)^2-f(-x)^2 \leq f(0)f(2x) = 0.\]In particular, swapping $x$ and $-x$, it follows that $f(x)^2 = f(-x)^2$. Now, summing the equations for $(x, y)$ and $(y, x)$,
\[f(x+y)(f(x-y) + f(y-x)) \geq f(x)^2-f(y)^2+f(y)^2-f(x)^2 = 0.\]In particular, there is $(x_0, y_0)$ such that this inequality is strict; i.e. for this pair $(x_0, y_0)$, it follows that $f(c) = f(-c) \neq 0$ where $c = x_0-y_0$. However, for all pairs $(x, x+c)$, it follows that
\[f(2x+c)(f(c)+f(c))) \geq 0\]by the same argument, hence if $f(c) > 0$, $f(2x+c) \geq 0$ for all $x$ and vice versa.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AshAuktober
1005 posts
#29
Y by
\subsection{Sol sketch}
We prove the contrapositive, i. e. given $a, b$ with $f(a) > 0, f(b) < 0$, equality must always hold.
The main claims are:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f(0) = 0$
\item $f(x)^2 = f(-x)^2$.
\end{enumerate}
From here, swap $x, y$ to get $$f(x+y)(f(x-y) + f(y-x)) \ge 0.$$If $f(x-y) = -f(y-x)$, we're done as equality holds and thus must hold in the original equation.
Else if $f(x-y) = f(y-x)$, choosing $x, y$ such that $x-y$ comes out to the value required and $x+ y = a$, we have $f(x-y) \ge 0$. But doing the same such that $x+y = b$, $f(x-y) \le 0$.Thus $f(x-y) = 0$, which would mean (yet again) that equality holds. Thus we're done,
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mr.Sharkman
500 posts
#30
Y by
Claim: $f(0) = 0$ or the problem is true.

Proof: Applying $P(x,x),$ we get
$$f(2x)f(0) \ge f(x)^{2}-f(x)^{2} =0,$$so if $f(0) \neq 0,$ then all of $f(2x)$ have the same sign, and we are done.

Because of this, we can assume that $f(0)= 0. $

Claim: For all $x,$ $f(x)^{2} = f(-x)^{2}.$

Proof: Notice that, by $P(-x, x),$ we get $$f(0)f(-2x) \ge f(-x)^{2}-f(x)^{2},$$so $f(x)^{2} \ge f(-x)^{2}.$ Also, $f(-x)^{2} \ge f(x)^{2},$ so $f(x)^{2} = f(-x)^{2},$ as desired.

Now, by applying $P(x,y), P(y,x),$ and adding these together, we get
$$f(x-y)f(x+y)+f(y-x)f(x+y)\ge 0 \implies (f(x-y)+f(y-x))f(x+y) \ge 0.$$and we will call this assertion $Q(x,y).$

Claim: If $f(a) = f(-a)$ for some $a,$ then we are done.

Proof: Notice that taking $Q\left(\frac{a+b}{2},\frac{b-a}{2}  \right)$ gives
$$(f(a)+f(-a))f(b)\ge 0 \implies f(a)f(b) \ge 0.$$Since $b$ was arbitrary, we are done. $\blacksquare$

So, now, we need to find such an $a.$

Claim: $a = x_{0}-y_{0}$ satisfies $f(a) = f(-a).$

Proof: Assume FTSOC that $f(a)+f(-a)=0.$ Then, $Q$ would be at an equality case. However, since $Q$ is the sum of two inequalities, one of which is $P(x_{0}, y_{0}),$ which is not an equality case, we are done. $\blacksquare$
Thus, we have completed the proof. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Mr.Sharkman, Jan 29, 2025, 2:41 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
dubabuba
1 post
#31
Y by
Call the assertion $P(x, y)$.

Summing up $P(x, y)$ and $P(y, x)$ gives us $f(x + y) (f(x - y) + f(y - x)) \ge 0$.
For any $a, b \in \mathbb{R}$, there exists $x, y \in \mathbb{R}$ such that $a = x + y$ and $b = x - y$.
Therefore, $f(a) (f(b) + f(-b)) \ge 0$ for any $ a, b \in \mathbb{R} ~(\star) $.

Denote $a_0 = x_0 + y_0, b_0 = x_0 - y_0$.
Since the given inequality is strict for $(x_0, y_0)$, $~(\star)$ is also strict for $(a_0, b_0)$.
In otherwords, there exists $a, b \in \mathbb{R}$ such that $f(a)(f(b) + f(-b)) > 0$.

Suppose that $f(a_0) > 0$. This also implies $f(b_0) + f(-b_0) > 0$.
Plugging $(x, b_0)$ in $~(\star)$ gives $f(x)(f(b_0) + f(-b_0)) \ge 0 \Longrightarrow \forall x \in \mathbb{R}: f(x) \ge 0$.
The case $f(a_0) < 0$ can be done in a similar way.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pie854
243 posts
#32
Y by
Putting $x=y$ we get that $f(2x)f(0)\geq 0$ and so we are done if $f(0)\neq 0$. Suppose $f(0)=0$. Putting $x=-y$ we get $f(y)^2\geq f(-y)^2$ and so, since this holds for all $y$, $f(y)^2=f(-y)^2$.

Suppose there exists some $t$ with $f(t)\neq -f(-t)$ (in particular, note that $f(t)\neq 0$). Putting $x=\frac{a+t}2$, $y=\frac{a-t}2$ we get $$f(a)f(t)\geq f\left (\frac{a+t}2\right)^2-f\left (\frac{a-t}2\right)^2$$and putting $x=\frac{a-t}2$, $y=\frac{a+t}2$ we get $$f(a)f(t)\geq f\left (\frac{a-t}2\right)^2-f\left (\frac{a+t}2\right)^2.$$Thus, $f(a)f(t)\geq 0$ for all $a$ and we're done.

Now suppose $f(x)=-f(-x)$ for all real $x$. Putting $(x,y) \mapsto (y,x)$ we get $$-f(x+y)f(x-y)=f(y+x)f(y-x)\geq f(y)^2-f(x)^2 \implies f(x+y)f(x-y)\leq f(x)^2-f(y)^2,$$thus $f(x+y)f(x-y)=f(x)^2-f(y)^2$ for all $x,y$. But this is a contradiction with the assumption that the inequality is strict for some $x_0,y_0$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ilikeminecraft
619 posts
#33
Y by
what

Rewrite as $f(a)f(b)\geq f\left(\frac{a + b}2\right)^2 + f\left(\frac{a - b}2\right)^2.$ Plug in $b\mapsto-b,$ and add to get $f(a)(f(b) + f(-b))\geq0.$ Since there exist $a_0, b_0$ such that the inequality is strict, we have $f(a_0) + f(-a_0)>0$ or $f(a_0) + f(-a_0) < 0.$ The two cases are the same, so we assume it is positive. Plug in $b = a_0$ and we get $f(a)\geq0.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Nari_Tom
117 posts
#34
Y by
We have that: $f(x+y)f(x-y) \geq f(x)^2-f(y)^2$.

By swapping (x,y) we will get that: $f(x+y)f(y-x) \geq f(y)^2-f(x)^2$.

Combining these we get: $f(x+y)[f(x-y)+f(y-x)] \geq 0$. If we take $(x=\frac{a+b}{2}, y=\frac{a-b}{2})$, then last inequality implies $f(a)[f(b)+f(-b)] \geq 0$, for all $a,b \in \mathbb{R}$. If there exist $c \in \mathbb {R}$ such that $f(c)+f(-c) \neq 0$, then $f(a)$ have same sign with $f(c)+f(-c)$.

But there exist such $c$, since $f(x_0+y_0)[f(x_0-y_0)+f(y_0-x_0)]>0$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Andyexists
6 posts
#35
Y by
For $x = y$, we get $f(2x)f(0) \geq f(x)^2 - f(x)^2 = 0$. If $f(0) \neq 0$, this implies $f(x)$ and $f(0)$ have the same sign, which finishes the problem.
Otherwise, $f(0) = 0$. Taking $y = -x$, we get $f(0)f(2x) \geq f(x)^2 - f(-x)^2$, from which $f(-x)^2 \geq f(x)^2$. Replacing $x$ with $-x$, we get $f(x)^2 \geq f(-x)^2$, and from the two inequalities we get $f(-x)^2 = f(x)^2, \forall x \in \mathbb{R}$.

This implies $f(-x) = \pm f(x)$. Replacing $x$ and $y$ in the statement, we get $f(y+x)f(y-x) \geq f(y)^2 - f(x)^2$, and by summing with $f(x+y)f(x-y) \geq f(x)^2 - f(y)^2$, we have \[f(x+y)(f(x-y) + f(y-x)) \geq.\]We know there exist $x_0, y_0$ for which the inequality in the statement is strict, which means there exist $x_0, y_0$ for which $f(x_0+y_0)(f(x_0-y_0) + f(y_0-x_0)) > 0$, which implies $f(x_0 - y_0) = f(y_0 - x_0)$, otherwise their sum is null. Let $d = x_0 - y_0$. Then $f(x + y)f(d) \geq 0$, for any $x+y$ with $|x - y| = d$. Let $x = d + y$, then $f(2y+d)f(d) \geq 0$, so $f(d + 2y)$ and $f(d)$ have the same sign, which solves the problem, as $2y + d$ takes any real value.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a