ka April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.
WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.
Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!
Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29
Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Intermediate: Grades 8-12
Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:
To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.
More specifically:
For new threads:
a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.
Examples: Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿) Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"
b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.
Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".
c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote][/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.
For answers to already existing threads:
d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve , do not answer with " is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like " is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.
e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.
To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).
The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
Solve All 6 IMO 2024 Problems (42/42), New Framework Looking for Feedback
Blackhole.LightKing4
N3 minutes ago
by Blackhole.LightKing
Hi everyone,
I’ve been experimenting with a different way of approaching mathematical problem solving — a framework that emphasizes recursive structures and symbolic alignment rather than conventional step-by-step strategies.
Using this method, I recently attempted all six problems from IMO 2024 and was able to arrive at what I believe are valid full-mark solutions across the board (42/42 total score, by standard grading).
However, I don’t come from a formal competition background, so I’m sure there are gaps in clarity, communication, or even logic that I’m not fully aware of.
If anyone here is willing to take a look and provide feedback, I’d appreciate it — especially regarding:
The correctness and completeness of the proofs
Suggestions on how to make the ideas clearer or more elegant
Whether this approach has any broader potential or known parallels
I'm here to learn more and improve the presentation and thinking behind the work.
Source: 2012 European Girls’ Mathematical Olympiad P7
Let be an acute-angled triangle with circumcircle and orthocentre . Let be a point of on the other side of from . Let be the reflection of in the line , and let be the reflection of in the line . Let be the second point of intersection of with the circumcircle of triangle .
Show that the lines , and are concurrent. (The orthocentre of a triangle is the point on all three of its altitudes.)
Let be a positive integer. We start with piles of pebbles, each initially containing a single pebble. One can perform moves of the following form: choose two piles, take an equal number of pebbles from each pile and form a new pile out of these pebbles. Find (in terms of ) the smallest number of nonempty piles that one can obtain by performing a finite sequence of moves of this form.
Let be an acute triangle and let be the midpoint of . A circle passing through and meets the sides and at points and respectively. Let be the point such that is a parallelogram. Suppose that lies on the circumcircle of . Determine all possible values of .
Let and be the quantities on the LHS and RHS, respectively. Since they have equal sum and sum of squares (), their second symmetric sums are equal. Additionally, their products are equal because where . It follows that and are the roots of the same cubic; specifically, equals one of . If or , the result is trivial; if , whence as desired.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by peace09, Aug 10, 2023, 4:57 PM Reason: wording
Note that expanding and using area gives us
Next,
Now by Vieta's these are roots of the same polynomial, from which it's easy to see that the triangle is isosceles.
Let the three elements on the LHS and the elements on the RHS.
First, we can see that
The second equality comes from the fact that : And the last equality comes from a simple expansion. By Vieta, we can deduce that both of the triples are roots of the same polynomial of the third degree. One can check the three cases of equality to prove the desired result.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Cusofay, Dec 2, 2023, 2:04 PM Reason: .
The sets and are equivalent.
First, notice that Thus, by this and the condition given, Now, notice that Call this common product for some number ( is just the area). We know that so the product of these square root expressions are the same as well. Thus, by Vieta's, the claim is proven.
Now, we have that which gives us that or which gives or and finally, This case is a bit tricker. Notice that, after rearranging, and since we know that the sets and are the same. Then, since these numbers are positive, we have that and so we are done.
Since the geometry condition is kinda useless we can denote , and (in that way the triangle has area ). Now let , and , and also let , and be the roots of a polynomial P(x). Let , and , and also let , and be the roots of a polynomial Q(x). From the condition of the problem we get that . Now . Also . We have that and . We know that and and since we know and , this means now we have that ,,, which by Vieta's means that the two polynomials have equal roots. Now WLOG b = c, WLOG a = b, WLOG a = c whatever is the equality in the roots from LHS and RHS there are always two equal sides of the triangle is isosceles. We are ready.
Our first step is to reduce the number of variables in the problem, specifically to establish a relationship between ,, and ,,. The geometric condition doesn't impose any specific constraints, so we can assume that the area of the triangle is . Using the area formula, we obtain the relationships:
Next, consider the two sides of the equation as two separate polynomials. Let the LHS be , with roots:
The RHS will be , with roots:
Let's examine the relationships between the roots. The first relationship is:
This follows from the conditions given in the problem. Another important relationship is:
This can be seen by writing it out explicitly:
and
This shows that .
Our goal is to show that two of ,, are equal. We now focus on the pairwise relationships in the polynomial. We know:
This is true by the commutative property after removing the square roots. From Newton's sums, we have:
Replacing with and , and using our known equalities, we get:
Given that:
are all true, Vieta's formulas imply that and have the same roots. Setting combinations of roots equal to each other:
Thus, there will always be two equal sides in the triangle, proving that it is isosceles.
Let . Then, we have the equation: Without loss of generality, let . The equation becomes: From the equation, we observe that: and similarly, by symmetry in the numerators and denominators, we also have: and: Thus, the sets of roots for the polynomials formed by these expressions must be identical: Now, considering the symmetry of the expressions, we analyze the three cases: Thus, we conclude that the solution is: