We choose 5 white squares on the lower triangle, 5 black squares on the upper triangle and one on the diagonal, which we remove from the grid.
Like for example here:
IMAGE
Can we completely cover the grid remove from these 11 squares with 2*1 dominoes like this one:
Given a fixed circle and two fixed points on that circle, let be a moving point on such that is acute and scalene. Let be the midpoint of and let be the three heights of . In two rays , we pick respectively such that . Let be the intersection of and , and let be the second intersection of and .
a) Show that the circle always goes through a fixed point.
b) Let intersects at . In the tangent line through of , we pick such that . Let be the center of . Show that always goes through a fixed point.
Source: Russian May TST to IMO 2023; group of candidates P6; group of non-candidates P8
The integer is given. Let be set of all segments of real line of type , where and are integers, . A subset is said to be valuable if the intersection of any two segments from is either empty, or is a segment of nonzero length belonging to . Find the number of valuable subsets of set .
bro! the middle term is a^n + a^{n-1}b + ... + b^n, so it has 11 terms made up of mixed powers of a and b. Because a>b, then the middle term is larger than (n+1)b^n. Because b<a, the middle term is less than (n+1)a^n. Easy Peasy Lemon Squeezy! Now that's rizz!
I agree! vsarg's proof is thorough and complete! Anyone who says the opposite is just a hater unwilling to embrace the fundamental property of multiplication and factorisations!
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by ohiorizzler1434, Mar 15, 2025, 11:59 PM
Sorry I'm dumb, found it out myself a bit later.
I was stuck on a problem till I reached right here. Thought I was still a long way through, before realising what is the fudging problem quoting at the very beginning.
This is the natural solution above! I have an idea that is not only valid for natural numbers ! Let's see! Consider the function on the interval . If we apply Lagrange's finite growth theorem, then there is a in the interval for which But since we already got the problem. And we didn't have to use the abbreviated calculation formula anywhere, which is only valid for natural numbers !
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by invisibleman, Mar 20, 2025, 8:53 AM
bro! the middle term is a^n + a^{n-1}b + ... + b^n, so it has 11 terms made up of mixed powers of a and b. Because a>b, then the middle term is larger than (n+1)b^n. Because b<a, the middle term is less than (n+1)a^n. Easy Peasy Lemon Squeezy! Now that's rizz!
I agree! vsarg's proof is thorough and complete! Anyone who says the opposite is just a hater unwilling to embrace the fundamental property of multiplication and factorisations!
Very correct Ohifrizzler thank yod for baking me up from meanies like Eazy. In Kentucky we would horse race them to seeee whos the better one.