Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.

Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.

Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

AIME Problem Series A
Thursday, May 22 - Jul 31

AIME Problem Series B
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
May 1, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
Burapha integer
EeEeRUT   1
N 5 minutes ago by ItzsleepyXD
Source: TMO 2025 P1
For each positive integer $m$, denote by $d(m)$ the number of positive divisors of $m$. We say that a positive integer $n$ is Burapha integer if it satisfy the following condition
[list]
[*] $d(n)$ is an odd integer.
[*] $d(k) \leqslant d(\ell)$ holds for every positive divisor $k, \ell$ of $n$, such that $k < \ell$
[/list]
Find all Burapha integer.
1 reply
EeEeRUT
22 minutes ago
ItzsleepyXD
5 minutes ago
Algebra inequalities
TUAN2k8   1
N 6 minutes ago by lbh_qys
Source: Own
Is that true?
Let $a_1,a_2,...,a_n$ be real numbers such that $0 \leq a_i \leq 1$ for all $1 \leq i \leq n$.
Prove that: $\sum_{1 \leq i<j \leq n} (a_i-a_j)^2 \leq \frac{n}{2}$.
1 reply
TUAN2k8
35 minutes ago
lbh_qys
6 minutes ago
Thailand MO 2025 P3
Kaimiaku   1
N 13 minutes ago by ItzsleepyXD
Let $a,b,c,x,y,z$ be positive real numbers such that $ay+bz+cx \le az+bx+cy$. Prove that $$ \frac{xy}{ax+bx+cy}+\frac{yz}{by+cy+az}+\frac{zx}{cz+az+bx} \le \frac{x+y+z}{a+b+c}$$
1 reply
+2 w
Kaimiaku
36 minutes ago
ItzsleepyXD
13 minutes ago
Quadrilateral with Congruent Diagonals
v_Enhance   37
N 24 minutes ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: USA TSTST 2012, Problem 2
Let $ABCD$ be a quadrilateral with $AC = BD$. Diagonals $AC$ and $BD$ meet at $P$. Let $\omega_1$ and $O_1$ denote the circumcircle and the circumcenter of triangle $ABP$. Let $\omega_2$ and $O_2$ denote the circumcircle and circumcenter of triangle $CDP$. Segment $BC$ meets $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$ again at $S$ and $T$ (other than $B$ and $C$), respectively. Let $M$ and $N$ be the midpoints of minor arcs $\widehat {SP}$ (not including $B$) and $\widehat {TP}$ (not including $C$). Prove that $MN \parallel O_1O_2$.
37 replies
v_Enhance
Jul 19, 2012
Ilikeminecraft
24 minutes ago
Oh my god
EeEeRUT   0
28 minutes ago
Source: TMO 2025 P5
In a class, there are $n \geqslant 3$ students and a teacher with $M$ marbles. The teacher then play a Marble distribution according to the following rules. At the start, each student receives at least $1$ marbles from the teacher. Then, the teacher chooses a student , who has never been chosen before, such that the number of marbles that he owns in a multiple of $2(n-1)$. That chosen student then equally distribute half of his marbles to $n-1$ other students. The same goes on until the teacher is not able to choose anymore student.

Find all integer $M$, such that the teacher can give each student a number of marbles, so that he can choose all the student, resulting in each student receiving equal amount of marbles at the end.
0 replies
EeEeRUT
28 minutes ago
0 replies
geometry
EeEeRUT   1
N 36 minutes ago by ItzsleepyXD
Source: TMO 2025
Let $D,E$ and $F$ be touch points of the incenter of $\triangle ABC$ at $BC, CA$ and $AB$, respectively. Let $P,Q$ and $R$ be the circumcenter of triangles $AFE, BDF$ and $CED$, respectively. Show that $DP, EQ$ and $FR$ concurrent.
1 reply
EeEeRUT
40 minutes ago
ItzsleepyXD
36 minutes ago
Spanish Mathematical Olympiad 2002, Problem 1
OmicronGamma   3
N 40 minutes ago by NicoN9
Source: Spanish Mathematical Olympiad 2002
Find all the polynomials $P(t)$ of one variable that fullfill the following for all real numbers $x$ and $y$:
$P(x^2-y^2) = P(x+y)P(x-y)$.
3 replies
OmicronGamma
Jun 2, 2017
NicoN9
40 minutes ago
Inspired by lbh_qys.
sqing   3
N an hour ago by lbh_qys
Source: Own
Let $ a,b>0   $ . Prove that
$$ \frac{a}{a^2+a +b+1}+ \frac{b}{b^2+a +b+1}  \leq  \frac{1}{2} $$$$ \frac{a}{a^2+ab+a+b+1}+ \frac{b}{b^2+ab+a+b+1} \leq   \sqrt 2-1  $$$$\frac{a}{a^2+ab+a+1}+ \frac{b}{b^2+ab+b+1} \leq  \frac{2(2\sqrt 2-1)}{7} $$$$\frac{a}{a^2+ab+b+1}+ \frac{b}{b^2+ab+a+1} \leq  \frac{2(2\sqrt 2-1)}{7} $$
3 replies
sqing
4 hours ago
lbh_qys
an hour ago
Additive set with special property
the_universe6626   1
N an hour ago by jasperE3
Source: Janson MO 1 P2
Let $S$ be a nonempty set of positive integers such that:
$\bullet$ if $m,n\in S$ then $m+n\in S$.
$\bullet$ for any prime $p$, there exists $x\in S$ such that $p\nmid x$.
Prove that the set of all positive integers not in $S$ is finite.

(Proposed by cknori)
1 reply
the_universe6626
Feb 21, 2025
jasperE3
an hour ago
ISI UGB 2025 P4
SomeonecoolLovesMaths   8
N an hour ago by chakrabortyahan
Source: ISI UGB 2025 P4
Let $S^1 = \{ z \in \mathbb{C} \mid |z| =1 \}$ be the unit circle in the complex plane. Let $f \colon S^1 \longrightarrow S^2$ be the map given by $f(z) = z^2$. We define $f^{(1)} \colon = f$ and $f^{(k+1)} \colon = f \circ f^{(k)}$ for $k \geq 1$. The smallest positive integer $n$ such that $f^{(n)}(z) = z$ is called the period of $z$. Determine the total number of points in $S^1$ of period $2025$.
(Hint : $2025 = 3^4 \times 5^2$)
8 replies
SomeonecoolLovesMaths
Sunday at 11:24 AM
chakrabortyahan
an hour ago
So Many Terms
oVlad   7
N 2 hours ago by NuMBeRaToRiC
Source: KöMaL A. 765
Find all functions $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ which satisfy the following equality for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$ \[f(x)f(y)-f(x-1)-f(y+1)=f(xy)+2x-2y-4.\]Proposed by Dániel Dobák, Budapest
7 replies
oVlad
Mar 20, 2022
NuMBeRaToRiC
2 hours ago
Cauchy like Functional Equation
ZETA_in_olympiad   3
N 2 hours ago by jasperE3
Find all functions $f:\bf R^{\geq 0}\to R$ such that $$f(x^2)+f(y^2)=f\left (\dfrac{x^2y^2-2xy+1}{x^2+2xy+y^2}\right)$$for all $x,y>0$ and $xy>1.$
3 replies
ZETA_in_olympiad
Aug 20, 2022
jasperE3
2 hours ago
special polynomials and probability
harazi   12
N 2 hours ago by MathLuis
Source: USA TST 2005, Problem 3, created by Harazi and Titu
We choose random a unitary polynomial of degree $n$ and coefficients in the set $1,2,...,n!$. Prove that the probability for this polynomial to be special is between $0.71$ and $0.75$, where a polynomial $g$ is called special if for every $k>1$ in the sequence $f(1), f(2), f(3),...$ there are infinitely many numbers relatively prime with $k$.
12 replies
harazi
Jul 14, 2005
MathLuis
2 hours ago
Hard to approach it !
BogG   131
N 3 hours ago by Giant_PT
Source: Swiss Imo Selection 2006
Let $\triangle ABC$ be an acute-angled triangle with $AB \not= AC$. Let $H$ be the orthocenter of triangle $ABC$, and let $M$ be the midpoint of the side $BC$. Let $D$ be a point on the side $AB$ and $E$ a point on the side $AC$ such that $AE=AD$ and the points $D$, $H$, $E$ are on the same line. Prove that the line $HM$ is perpendicular to the common chord of the circumscribed circles of triangle $\triangle ABC$ and triangle $\triangle ADE$.
131 replies
BogG
May 25, 2006
Giant_PT
3 hours ago
sequence positive
malinger   37
N Apr 25, 2025 by Ilikeminecraft
Source: ISL 2006, A2, VAIMO 2007, P4, Poland 2007
The sequence of real numbers $a_0,a_1,a_2,\ldots$ is defined recursively by \[a_0=-1,\qquad\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{a_{n-k}}{k+1}=0\quad\text{for}\quad n\geq 1.\]Show that $ a_{n} > 0$ for all $ n\geq 1$.

Proposed by Mariusz Skalba, Poland
37 replies
malinger
Apr 22, 2007
Ilikeminecraft
Apr 25, 2025
sequence positive
G H J
Source: ISL 2006, A2, VAIMO 2007, P4, Poland 2007
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
malinger
89 posts
#1 • 12 Y
Y by itslumi, mathematicsy, jhu08, HWenslawski, megarnie, Adventure10, Mango247, cliid, BorivojeGuzic123, and 3 other users
The sequence of real numbers $a_0,a_1,a_2,\ldots$ is defined recursively by \[a_0=-1,\qquad\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{a_{n-k}}{k+1}=0\quad\text{for}\quad n\geq 1.\]Show that $ a_{n} > 0$ for all $ n\geq 1$.

Proposed by Mariusz Skalba, Poland
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by djmathman, Jun 27, 2015, 12:05 AM
Reason: changed problem statement to match english version of ISL2006
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Goblin
89 posts
#2 • 12 Y
Y by anantmudgal09, Supercali, mijail, Adventure10, jhu08, veirab, Mango247, and 5 other users
We can use induction. For $n=1$ this is trivial. Now, if it's true for $m\leq n$, from $(n+1)a_{n}+\frac{n+1}{2}a_{n-1}+\ldots+a_{0}=0$ and $(n+2)a_{n+1}+\frac{n+2}{2}a_{n}+\ldots+a_{0}=0$, we get $(n+2)a_{n+1}=\sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}\left(\frac{n+1}{n+1-i}-\frac{n+2}{n+2-i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{n}a_{i}\frac{i}{(n+1-i)(n+2-i)}$ which is positive.
I really think that it's not OK that you posted this problem.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
darij grinberg
6555 posts
#3 • 7 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247, and 4 other users
I rather think it is not OK that this problem was used in the Polish MO...

Darij
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
edriv
232 posts
#4 • 5 Y
Y by Aryan-23, Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247, and 1 other user
Goblin wrote:
I really think that it's not OK that you posted this problem.

And I think it's not ok you know that this problem is not ok :D
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cosinator
514 posts
#5 • 5 Y
Y by Samusasuke, jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247, and 1 other user
Is this right?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ilya_kachan
30 posts
#6 • 5 Y
Y by expotential, jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247, and 1 other user
malinger wrote:
Let $ a_{0},a_{1},a_{2},\ldots $ be a sequence of reals such that $ a_{0} = - 1$ and

$ a_{n} + \frac {a_{n - 1}}{2} + \frac {a_{n - 2}}{3} + \ldots + \frac {a_{1}}{n} + \frac {a_{0}}{n + 1} = 0$ for all $ n\geq 1$.

Show that $ a_{n} > 0$ for all $ n\geq 1$.

Proposed by Mariusz Skalba, Poland
Solution that uses Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

We can write the following formula for $n$:

$a_n=-\frac{a_{n-1}}{2}-...-\frac{a_1}{n}-\frac{a_0}{n+1}$, $(1)$.

and for $n-1$:

$0=\frac{a_{n-1}}{1}+\frac{a_{n-2}}{2}+...+\frac{a_0}{n}$. $(2)$.

Adding up equations $(1)$ and $(2)$ we get:

$a_n=a_{n-1}(1-\frac{1}{2})+a_{n-2}(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{3})+...+a_0(\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+1})$,

or:

$a_n=\frac{a_{n-1}}{1 \cdot 2}+\frac{a_{n-2}}{2 \cdot 3}+...+\frac{a_0}{n \cdot (n+1)}$ for all $n \geq 2$.

Let's prove the assertation by induction on $n$. The base for $n=1$ is obvious: $a_1=-\frac{a_0}{2}=\frac{1}{2}>0$. Let's suppose that the assertation is true for all integers from $1$ till $n-1$: $a_i>0$ $\forall i \in \{1,2,...,n-1\}$. By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality:

$(\frac{a_{n-1}}{1 \cdot 2}+\frac{a_{n-2}}{2 \cdot 3}+...+\frac{a_1}{(n-1) \cdot n})(\frac{2a_{n-1}}{1}+\frac{3a_{n-2}}{2}+...+\frac{na_1}{n-1}) \geq (\frac{a_{n-1}}{1}+$
$+\frac{a_{n-2}}{2}+...+\frac{a_1}{n-1})^2$.

Using equation $(2)$:

$\frac{a_{n-1}}{1 \cdot 2}+\frac{a_{n-2}}{2 \cdot 3}+...+\frac{a_1}{(n-1) \cdot n} \geq \frac{a_0^2}{n^2(\frac{2a_{n-1}}{1}+\frac{3a_{n-2}}{2}+...+\frac{na_1}{n-1})}$.

But:

$2a_{n-1}+\frac{3}{2}a_{n-2}+...+\frac{n}{n-1}a_1=(a_{n-1}+\frac{a_{n-2}}{2}+...+$
$+\frac{a_1}{n-1})+(a_{n-1}+\frac{a_{n-2}}{2}+...+\frac{a_1}{n-1})+(\frac{a_{n-2}}{2}+\frac{a_{n-3}}{3}+...+\frac{a_1}{n-1})+(\frac{a_{n-3}}{3}+$
$+...+\frac{a_1}{n-1})+...+\frac{a_1}{n-1} \leq n \cdot \frac{-a_0}{n}=-a_0$

by the equation $(2)$ and since numbers $a_1, a_2, ..., a_{n-1}>0$. Thus:

$\frac{a_{n-1}}{1 \cdot 2}+\frac{a_{n-2}}{2 \cdot 3}+...+\frac{a_1}{(n-1) \cdot n} \geq \frac{a_0^2}{n^2 \cdot (-a_0)}=\frac{-a_0}{n^2}$.

So:

$a_n=(\frac{a_{n-1}}{1 \cdot 2}+\frac{a_{n-2}}{2 \cdot 3}+...+\frac{a_1}{(n-1) \cdot n})+\frac{a_0}{n(n+1)} \geq \frac{-a_0}{n \cdot n}+\frac{a_0}{n(n+1)}=\frac{1}{n \cdot n}-$
$-\frac{1}{n \cdot (n+1)}=\frac{1}{n^2(n+1)}>0$,

as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
andywu
56 posts
#7 • 3 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
n=1 is trivial
let if n<k or n=k ,we have $ a_{n}>0 $
n=k+1:
we know that
$ a_{k}+\frac{a_{k-1}}{2}+...+\frac{a_1}{k}+\frac{a_0}{k+1}=0 $
$ 
\frac{a_{k}}{2}+...+\frac{a_1}{k+1}+\frac{a_0}{k+2}
< = (a_{k}+\frac{a_{k-1}}{2}+...+\frac{a_1}{k})*\frac{k}{k+1}+\frac{a_0}{k+2}
= -\frac{a_0}{k+1}*\frac{k}{k+1}+\frac{a_0}{k+2}
=(\frac{1}{k+2}-\frac{k}{(k+1)^2})a_0
=\frac{1}{(k+2)(k+1)^2}a_0 <0  $
so that a_(k+1)>0

by MIT , we done
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by andywu, May 9, 2015, 11:33 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
randomusername
1059 posts
#8 • 5 Y
Y by Tintarn, 62861, anantmudgal09, jhu08, Adventure10
ISL 2006 wrote:
Students familiar with the technique of generating functions will immediately recognise $\sum a_nx^n$ as the power series expansion of $x/ \log(1-x)$ (with value $-1$ at $0$). But this can be a trap; attempts along these lines lead to unpleasant differential equations and integrals hard to handle. Using only tools from real analysis (e.g. computing the coefficients from the derivatives) seems very difficult.

It isn't that difficult! There exists a solution with only real analysis, and a pretty tasteful integral formula for the coefficients.

Problem

Formula

Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Kezer
986 posts
#9 • 5 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247, BorivojeGuzic123, Ulapu_Kanama
Uhm, kind of felt a little bit contrived.

We'll induct on $n$. As $a_1+\tfrac{a_0}{2} = 0 \iff a_1 = \tfrac12$, the number $a_1$ is positive. Now assume $a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n >0$. Note \[ 0=\sum_{k=0}^n \frac{a_{n-k}}{k+1} = a_n + \frac{a_{n-1}}{2}+\frac{a_{n-2}}{3}+\dots+\frac{a_0}{n+1} \qquad \text{and} \qquad 0=\sum_{k=0}^{n+1} \frac{a_{n+1-k}}{k+1} = a_{n+1} + \frac{a_{n}}{2}+\frac{a_{n-1}}{3}+\dots+\frac{a_0}{n+2} \]Subtracting yields \[ 0 = a_{n+1}-\frac{a_n}{2}-\frac{a_{n-1}}{6}-\frac{a_{n-2}}{12}-\dots-\frac{a_0}{(n+2)(n+1)} \iff a_{n+1} = \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{a_{n-k}}{(k+1)(k+2)}. \]But now note \begin{align*} a_{n+1} = \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{a_{n-k}}{(k+1)(k+2)} &= \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\frac{a_{n-k}}{(k+1)(k+2)} + \frac{a_0}{(n+2)(n+1)}
\\ &\geq \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\frac{a_{n-k}}{(n+1)(k+1)} + \frac{a_0}{(n+2)(n+1)}
\\ &= \frac{1}{n+1} \left( \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\frac{a_{n-k}}{k+1} + \frac{a_0}{n+2} \right)
\\ &= \frac{1}{n+1} \left( -\frac{a_0}{n+1} + \frac{a_0}{n+2} \right)
\\ &> 0 \end{align*}Done, yay! It really worked, wow, needed the write-up to confirm that.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Kezer, Aug 24, 2016, 12:25 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HadjBrahim-Abderrahim
169 posts
#10 • 2 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10
malinger wrote:
The sequence of real numbers $a_0,a_1,a_2,\ldots$ is defined recursively by \[a_0=-1,\qquad\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{a_{n-k}}{k+1}=0\quad\text{for}\quad n\geq 1.\]Show that $ a_{n} > 0$ for all $ n\geq 1$.

Proposed by Mariusz Skalba, Poland

Here is my solution, we prove the problem by induction on $n\ge 1.$ When $n=1$ we have, $0=a_1+\frac{a_0}{2},$ which means that $a_1=-\frac{a_0}{2}=\frac{1}{2}>0.$ Assume that the numbers $a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n$ are greater then zero for some positive integer $n.$ Since $x_0=-1<0,$ we can see that we will have some problems when we keep it and try to prove that $a_{n+1}>0,$ so we try to remove it. Because, $\sum_{k=0}^{n+1} \frac{a_{n+1-k}}{k+1}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n-k}{k+1}=0,$ we have \begin{align*} a_{n+1}(n+2)&=(n+1)\left(a_n+\frac{a_{n-1}}{2}+\cdots+\frac{a_0}{n+1}\right)-(n+2)\left(\frac{a_n}{2}+\frac{a_{n-1}}{3}+\cdots+\frac{a_0}{n+2}\right)\\&=(n+1)\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\frac{a_{n-i}}{i+1}+(n+2)\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\frac{a_{n-i}}{i+2}\\&=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\frac{(n-i)a_{n-i}}{(i+1)(i+2)}>0,\end{align*}which means that $a_{n+1}>0.$ This ends the induction and solves the problem.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
william122
1576 posts
#11 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
We will use induction. Note that the base case is trivial, so assume $a_{n-1},\ldots, a_1>0$. We have that $\sum_{k=0}^{n-2}\frac{a_{n-1-k}}{k+1}=\frac{1}{n}$, so $$\sum_{k=0}^{n-2}\frac{n-1}{n}\cdot\frac{a_{n-1-k}}{k+1}=\frac{n-1}{n^2}\implies\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}\frac{a_{n-k}}{k+1}<\frac{n-1}{n^2}\implies a_n=-\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{a_{n-k}}{k+1}>\frac{1}{n+1}-\frac{n-1}{n^2}=\frac{1}{(n+1)n^2}>0$$as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6877 posts
#12 • 4 Y
Y by mathiscool12, v4913, jhu08, BorivojeGuzic123
Solution from Twitch Solves ISL:

In fact, it suffices to take the two consecutive equations \begin{align*} 	0 &= \frac{a_n}{1} + \frac{a_{n-1}}{2} + \frac{a_{n-2}}{3} 		+ \dots + \frac{a_0}{n+1} \\ 	0 &= \frac{a_{n+1}}{1} + \frac{a_n}{2} + \frac{a_{n-1}}{3} + 		\frac{a_{n-2}}{4} 		+ \dots + \frac{a_0}{n+2} \end{align*}and subtract $\frac{n+1}{n+2}$ times the first equation from the second (eliminating the $a_0$) to obtain a new recursion \begin{align*} 	a_{n+1} &= \left( \frac{n+1}{n+2} \cdot \frac11 - \frac12 \right) a_n 	+ \left( \frac{n+1}{n+2} \cdot \frac12 - \frac13 \right) a_{n-1} \\ 	&\qquad+ \left( \frac{n+1}{n+12} \cdot \frac13 - \frac14 \right) a_{n-2} + \dots 	+ \left( \frac{n+1}{n+2} \cdot \frac1n - \frac1{n+1} \right) a_1. \end{align*}This recursion has the property that all the coefficients in parentheses are positive. Since $a_1 = 1/2 > 0$, this implies the result by induction.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by v_Enhance, Jun 5, 2020, 8:15 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Cvirus213
52 posts
#13 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
@above
Hi Evan,to eliminate $a_0$ we need to subtract $\frac{n+1}{n+2}$ of the 1st equation from the 2nd one.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6877 posts
#14 • 5 Y
Y by v4913, jhu08, Mango247, Mango247, Mango247
I really messed up all the indices, huh :(

Fixed, thanks for pointing it out.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pad
1671 posts
#15 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
Induct on $n$, the case $n=1$ trivial since $a_1=1/2$. So we can assume $a_1,\ldots,a_{n-1}>0$; this makes all the inequalities easier to deal with. Note that
\[ \frac{a_1}{n-1} + \frac{a_2}{n-2} + \cdots + \frac{a_{n-1}}{1} = \frac{1}{n} \implies \frac{1}{n}a_1 + \frac{n-1}{n(n-2)}a_2 + \cdots + \frac{n-1}{n} a_{n-1} = \frac{n-1}{n^2}. \]That is,
\[ \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \frac{n-1}{n(n-k)}a_k = \frac{n-1}{n^2}.\]In order to show $a_n>0$, we want to show
\[\frac{a_1}{n} + \frac{a_2}{n-1} + \cdots + \frac{a_{n-2}}{3} + \frac{a_{n-1}}{2}  = \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \frac{a_k}{n+1-k} < \frac{1}{n+1}.\]We see that $\tfrac{n-1}{n(n-k)} \ge \tfrac{1}{n+1-k} \iff (n-1)(n-k+1) \ge n(n-k) \iff k\ge1$, which is always true. And it is easy to see that $\tfrac{1}{n+1} > \tfrac{n-1}{n^2}$. Hence,
\[ \frac{1}{n+1} > \frac{n-1}{n^2} = \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \frac{n(n-1)}{n(n-k)}a_k \ge \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \frac{a_k}{n+1-k} .\]This completes the proof.

Remarks
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by pad, Apr 25, 2020, 8:05 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
jj_ca888
2726 posts
#16 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
It suffices to show that $\tfrac{a_1}{n} + \tfrac{a_2}{n-1} + \ldots + \tfrac{a_{n-1}}{2}< \tfrac{1}{n+1}$ for all positive integer $n \geq 2$. We strong induct on $n$.

The base cases are clear; We can easily calculate $a_2 = \tfrac12$ and $a_2 = \tfrac{1}{12}$. Note that $\tfrac14 < \tfrac13$ and $\tfrac{5}{24} < \tfrac14$ hence $n = 2$ and $n = 3$ hold as desired.

In the inductive step, we are allowed to assume that the result holds for all $n \leq k$. Hence by the inductive hypothesis we may assume that the terms $a_0, a_1, \ldots , a_k$ are all positive and $\tfrac{a_1}{k} + \tfrac{a_2}{k-1} + \ldots + \tfrac{a_{k-1}}{2}< \tfrac{1}{k+1}$. We are motivated to relate the LHS to something we can find. More specifically, we can actually derive from the problem recursion that\[\frac{a_1}{k} + \frac{a_2}{k-1} + \ldots + \frac{a_{k}}{1} = \frac{1}{k+1}.\]Multiplying both sides by $\tfrac{k}{k+1}$ yields\[\frac{a_1(k)}{(k)(k+1)} + \frac{a_2(k)}{(k-1)(k+1)} + \ldots + \frac{a_{k}(k)}{(1)(k+1)} = \frac{k}{(k+1)^2}.\]In fact, we can actually check that $\tfrac{1}{k+2 - i} \leq \tfrac{k}{(k+1-i)(k+1)} \implies k^2 + 2k \geq (k+1)^2 - i$ is always true hence by our inductive hypothesis, the expression we seek, $S$, can be bounded:\[S \leq \frac{k}{(k+1)^2} < \frac{1}{k+2}\]as desired. $\blacksquare$

Remark: Induction was intuitive. I also wrote everything in non-summation notation because maybe it would be more clear to see the pattern? Also note that our entire comparison of sequences is correct because all previous terms are positive by inductive hypothesis.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by jj_ca888, Jun 23, 2020, 5:01 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
bever209
1522 posts
#17 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
Click to reveal hidden text
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by bever209, Sep 5, 2021, 11:24 PM
Reason: my brain ded
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AwesomeYRY
579 posts
#18 • 1 Y
Y by WolfusA
Note that
\[(n+1) \left(\frac{a_0}{n+1} + \frac{a_1}{n} + \cdots  + \frac{a_{n-1}}{2}+\frac{a_n}{1}\right)=0=n\left(\frac{a_0}{n} + \frac{a_1}{n-1}+\cdots + \frac{a_{n-1}}{1}\right)\]Thus,
\[(n+1)a_n = \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \left(\frac{n}{n-i}-\frac{n+1}{n-i+1}\right) a_{i}=\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \left(\frac{i}{(n-i)(n-i+1)}\right) a_{i}\]
Using this we claim by induction that for all $n\geq 1$, we have $a_n>0.$ Clearly this is true for $a_1 = \frac12 >0$. Then, by the previous equation the inductive step is clear, so we're done. $\blacksquare$.
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by AwesomeYRY, Sep 16, 2021, 2:03 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cj13609517288
1916 posts
#19
Y by
We proceed by strong induction. $a_1=\frac12>0$.
$$0=\frac{n+1}{n+2}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{a_{n-k}}{k+1}>\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\frac{a_{n+1-k}}{k+1}=\sum_{k=0}^{n+1}\frac{a_{n+1-k}}{k+1}-a_{n+1}\rightarrow \boxed{a_{n+1}>0}.$$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
asdf334
7585 posts
#20
Y by
A2?

We use strong induction; the base case $n=1$ is trivial. We have that
\[\frac{a_n}{1}+\frac{a_{n-1}}{2}+\dots+\frac{a_1}{n}=\frac{1}{n+1}\]and since
\[\frac{a_n}{2}+\frac{a_{n-1}}{3}+\dots+\frac{a_1}{n+1}<\frac{a_n}{1\cdot \tfrac{n+2}{n+1}}+\frac{a_{n-1}}{2\cdot \frac{n+2}{n+1}}+\dots+\frac{a_1}{n\cdot \tfrac{n+2}{n+1}}=\frac{1}{n+2}\]we get
\[\frac{a_{n+1}}{1}=\frac{1}{n+2}-\left(\frac{a_n}{2}+\frac{a_{n-1}}{3}+\dots+\frac{a_1}{n+1}\right)>0\]so we are done. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
awesomeming327.
1719 posts
#21
Y by
Let $P(n)=\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{a_{n-k}}{k+1}$, then $0=nP(n-1)-(n+1)P(n).$ Thus, \[0=-(n+1)a_{n}+\left(\frac{n+1}{2}-n\right)a{n-1}+\left(\frac{n+1}{3}-\frac{n}{2}\right)a{n-2}+\dots\]and $\frac{n+1}{k}-\frac{n}{k-1}$ here is always positive, unless $k=n+1$ where it's zero, so $(n+1)a_n>0$ implying result.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
5001 posts
#22
Y by
Induction on $n$, with $n=1$ trivial. Now, suppose that for some $n-1$, we have $a_{n-1},\ldots,a_1>0$. The idea is to separate the sum
$$\boxed{\frac{a_{n-1}}{1}+\frac{a_{n-2}}{2}+\cdots+\frac{a_1}{n-1}}+\boxed{\frac{a_0}{n}}$$into positive and negative parts as shown. Now, going from the above equation to
$$\frac{a_{n-1}}{2}+\frac{a_{n-2}}{3}+\cdots+\frac{a_1}{n}+\frac{a_0}{n+1}:=S,$$we multiply the positive part of the equation by at most $\tfrac{n-1}{n}$ (by considering each term), while we multiply the negative part of the equation by $\tfrac{n}{n+1}>\tfrac{n-1}{n}$, hence $S<0$. Since $S+\tfrac{a_n}{1}=0$, it follows that $a_n>0$, finishing the induction. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
minusonetwelth
225 posts
#23
Y by
We use induction, and the base case that $a_1=\frac12>0$ is easy to check. Now assume that it is true for $n=m-1$. Then for $n=m$ we know that
\[a_{m}+\frac{a_{m-1}}{2}+\frac{a_{m-2}}{3}+\ldots+\frac{a_0}{m+1}=0\]and also that
\[a_{m-1}+\frac{a_{m-2}}{2}+\frac{a_{m-3}}{3}+\ldots+\frac{a_0}{m}=0\]Multiplying both equations by $m+1$ and $m$ respectively, and then subtracting the second from the first, we get
\[a_m+\left(\frac{(m+1)a_{m-1}}{2}-ma_{m-1}\right)+\left(\frac{(m+1)a_{m-2}}{3}-\frac{ma_{m-2}}{2}\right)+\ldots+0=0\]Notice that $\frac{j+1}{i+1}-\frac{j}{i}<0$ as long as $j>i>0$, which is always the case here for $m+1$ and the denominator of each fraction. As all the $a_i$ are greater than $0$ by the induction hypothesis, each term in paranthesis is less than $0$, making $a_m>0$, which finishes the proof.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8866 posts
#24
Y by
We will proceed strong inductively. Consider the two equations
\begin{align*}
\frac{a_0}n + \frac{a_1}{n-1} + \frac{a_2}{n-2} + \cdots + a_n &= 0 \\
\frac{a_0}{n+1} + \frac{a_1}n + \frac{a_2}{n-1} +\cdots + \frac{a_n}2+a_{n+1} &=0.
\end{align*}Subtracting $n$ times the first from $n+1$ times the second, $$(n+1)a_{n+1} - a_n - \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{a_{n-i}}{i(i+1)} = 0.$$But all the terms subtracted are positive by the hypothesis, so this implies $a_{n+1} > 0$ as well.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
JAnatolGT_00
559 posts
#25
Y by
Induct on $n>0.$ We trivially deduce that $a_1=\frac 12,$ providing the base case $n=1.$ Next, the inductive step follows from
$$(n+2)a_{n+1}=\sum_{k=0}^n \left( \frac{n+1}{n-k+1}-\frac{n+2}{n-k+2} \right)a_k=\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{ka_k}{(n-k+1)(n-k+2)}>0\quad \blacksquare$$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
huashiliao2020
1292 posts
#26
Y by
Not sure why this was even in shortlist...
Base case is done with $a_1=1/2$. Inductive step: We know $$\frac{a_{n-1}}{1}+\cdots+\frac{a_1}{n-1}=-\frac{a_0}{n} \text{  (1)},$$and want to prove $$\frac{a_{n-1}}{2}+\cdots+\frac{a_1}{n}<-\frac{a_0}{n+1} \text{  (2)}$$because it would follow that $a_n$ would need to be positive s.t. the LHS is added with a positive number to maintain equality. Indeed, note that each term of LHS of (1) is multiplied by at most (n-1)/n to get LHS (2), while RHS of (1) is multiplied by n/(n+1). Put rigorously, RHS(2)=RHS(1)n/(n+1)$>$RHS(1)(n-1)/n=LHS(n-1)/n$>$LHS(2), as desired. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
OronSH
1747 posts
#27
Y by
solved with grents

First $a_1=\frac12>0.$ Consider $n\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\frac{a_{n-k-1}}{k+1}-(n+1)\sum_{k=0}^n \frac{a_{n-k}}{k+1}=0.$ This rearranges to $\sum_{k=1}^{n-1} a_k\left(\frac n{n-k}-\frac{n+1}{n+1-k}\right)=a_n(n+1)$ and we easily see that $\frac n{n-k}>\frac {n+1}{n+1-k}$ so we finish by induction.

bruh
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
amogususususus
370 posts
#28
Y by
This problem is easier than A1 in my opinion...
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
SenorSloth
37 posts
#29 • 1 Y
Y by OronSH
We use induction. Our base case is $n=1$, for which we can easily calculate $a_1=\frac 12$. Now for the inductive step, we assume that $a_i$ is positive for $1\leq i \leq n$, and we will prove that $a_{n+1}>0$ must also hold.

By the definition of the sequence, we have the following two equalities:
\begin{align*}
0&=\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{a_{n-k}}{k+1} \\
-a_{n+1}&=\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{a_{n-k}}{k+2}
\end{align*}
We multiply the first equation by $\frac{n+1}{n+2}$ to get
$$\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{(n+1)a_{n-k}}{(k+1)(n+2)}=0.$$
We will compare this sum term-by-term with the sum from our second equation. We notice that since $k\leq n$, $\frac{k+1}{k+2}\leq\frac{n+1}{n+2}$, and thus $\dfrac{a_{n-k}}{k+2} \leq \dfrac{(n+1)a_{n-k}}{(k+1)(n+2)}$, with the terms being equal only when $k=n$. This means that all of the positive terms of $\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{a_{n-k}}{k+2}$ are smaller than their respective terms in $\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{(n+1)a_{n-k}}{(k+1)(n+2)}$, while the negative term is the same, which tells us that
\[\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{a_{n-k}}{k+2}<\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{(n+1)a_{n-k}}{(k+1)(n+2)}=0\]
Since $-a_{n+1}=\sum_{k=0}^n\dfrac{a_{n-k}}{k+2}$ and we have determined the right side sum is negative, $a_{n+1}$ must be positive, which completes the induction.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
naonaoaz
332 posts
#30
Y by
We will use induction on $n$. The base case is clear.
Claim: For any $k \le n$,
\[\frac{1}{k-1} \cdot \frac{n}{n+1} > \frac{1}{k}\]Proof: Trivial by expanding. $\square$
Now assume $a_{\ell} > 0$ for all $\ell \le n-1$, and we will prove $a_n > 0$. From taking the sum to $n-1$ and $n$ we get:
\[\sum_{i = 1}^{n-1} \frac{a_{n-i}}{i} = -\frac{a_0}{n}\]\[\sum_{i = 0}^{n-1} \frac{a_{n-i}}{i+1} = -\frac{a_0}{n+1}\]Multiplying the first one by $\frac{n}{n+1}$ and plugging into the second gives
\[a_n = \sum_{i = 1}^{n-1} \frac{n}{n+1} \cdot \frac{a_{n-i}}{i} - \frac{a_{n-i}}{i+1}>0\]by our Claim and inductive hypothesis, so we're done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ywgh1
139 posts
#31
Y by
2006 ISL A2

We preceed with induction.
Base case is trivial.

Now look at
\[\frac{a_{n-1}}{1}+\cdots+\frac{a_1}{n-1}=-\frac{a_0}{n} \text{ (1)}\]
We want to show that.

\[\frac{a_{n-1}}{2}+\cdots+\frac{a_1}{n}<-\frac{a_0}{n+1} \text{ (2)}\]
Multiply $\frac{n-1}{n}$ to the LHS of the first equation. This will give us that the LHS of first equation is more than or equal the second one.
While for the RHS multiply by $\frac{n}{n+1}$ in order to get the RHS of the second equation.
Inductively we are done.
This post has been edited 6 times. Last edited by Ywgh1, Mar 30, 2025, 9:45 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mathandski
757 posts
#32
Y by
Subjective Rating (MOHs) $       $
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Hello_Kitty
1897 posts
#33
Y by
IMO 2006 Shortlist
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Jndd
1416 posts
#34
Y by
Take the equations \[\sum_{k=0}^n \frac{a_{n-k}}{k+1} = 0 \text{ and } \sum_{k=0}^{n+1} \frac{a_{{n+1}-k}}{k+1} = 0\]and multiply the first by $n+1$ and the second by $n+2$, and subtract the second equation from the first. The $a_0$ terms cancel out, and when we bring $-a_{n+1}$ to the other side of the equation, we see that the coefficients of all the other $a_i$ are of the form \[\frac{n+1}{k} - \frac{n+2}{k+1}=\frac{n+1-k}{k(k+1)}\]for $k<n+1$, which is positive. Hence, if $a_1,a_2,\ldots, a_k$ is positive for some $k$, then so is $a_{k+1}$. Having $a_1=\frac{1}{2}$ as the base case, this completes our induction.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
shendrew7
796 posts
#35 • 1 Y
Y by OronSH
First note $a_1 = \tfrac 12$ is positive. Then for $n \ge 1$, notice that
\[(n+1) \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \frac{a_{n-k}}{k+1} = (n+2) \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{a_{n+1-k}}{k+1} = -a_0\]\[\implies a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{n+2} \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} a_{n-k} \cdot \underbrace{\left(\frac{n+1}{k+1} - \frac{n+2}{k+2}\right)}_{> 0}\]
is positive if $a_1, \ldots, a_n$ is positive. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by shendrew7, Apr 20, 2025, 9:07 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Bonime
36 posts
#36
Y by
$\textbf{A2 IMOSL 2006}$
Is it just me or is A2 easier than A1?

Just induct in $n$
If $n=1$, $a_1+\frac{a_0}2=0 \Rightarrow a_1=\frac{1}2$.
Supose that $a_i>0$ for all $i\leq n$, then, we have $$\sum_{k=0}^n \frac{a_{n-k}}{k+1}=0 \iff \frac{n+1}{n+2} \sum_{k=0}^n \frac{a_{n-k}}{k+1}=0$$but, $$\sum_{k=0}^{n+1} \frac{a_{n+1-k}}{k+1}=0 \Rightarrow a_{n+1} + \sum_{k=1}^{n+1} (\frac{1}{k+1}-\frac{1}{k}\cdot \frac{n+1}{n+2})a_{n+1-k} = 0$$Thus we´re done because $\frac{1}{k+1}-\frac{1}{k} \cdot \frac{n+1}{n+2}\leq 0$ for all $k \leq n+1$ since $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{x+1}{x+2} = 1$. $\blacksquare$

$\textit{Obs.:}$ Note that the we just use the fact that $a_0<0$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Maximilian113
575 posts
#37
Y by
Poland has a bunch of contrived algebra LOL

We proceed by induction. The base case $n=1$ is trivial, so assume that the proposition holds for $1, 2, \cdots, n.$ For $n+1,$ observe that
\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{n+2} \sum_{k=0}^n \frac{a_{n-k}}{k+1} &= 0 = \frac{1}{n+1} \sum_{k=0}^{n+1} \frac{a_{n-k}}{k+1} \\
\implies \frac{a_{n+1}}{n+1} &= \sum_{k=1}^n a_{n-k+1} \left( \frac{1}{n+2} \cdot \frac{1}{k} - \frac{1}{n+1} \cdot \frac{1}{k+1} \right).
\end{align*}However, as $1 \leq k \leq n,$ $$\displaystyle \frac{1}{n+2} \cdot \frac{1}{k} - \frac{1}{n+1} \cdot \frac{1}{k+1} > 0 \iff (n+1)(k+1) > (n+2)k \iff n+k+1 > 2k \iff n+1 > k,$$hence each $a_i$'s coefficient in the sum is positive so $a_{n+1} > 0.$ QED
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ilikeminecraft
637 posts
#38
Y by
We prove this via induction. $a_1$ is obviously positive.

Assume $n\leq k$ are all positive. We prove that $a_{k + 1}\in \mathbb R^+.$ We have that $$(k + 1)a_{k + 1} + \frac{(k + 1)a_k}{2} + \cdots + a_0 = 0 = ka_{k + 1} + \frac{ka_k}{2} + \cdots + a_0$$This ends up simiplifying so that all terms on the rhs is positive, and the left hand is $(k + 1)a_{k + 1}$
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a