G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a My Retirement & New Leadership at AoPS
rrusczyk   1571
N Mar 26, 2025 by SmartGroot
I write today to announce my retirement as CEO from Art of Problem Solving. When I founded AoPS 22 years ago, I never imagined that we would reach so many students and families, or that we would find so many channels through which we discover, inspire, and train the great problem solvers of the next generation. I am very proud of all we have accomplished and I’m thankful for the many supporters who provided inspiration and encouragement along the way. I'm particularly grateful to all of the wonderful members of the AoPS Community!

I’m delighted to introduce our new leaders - Ben Kornell and Andrew Sutherland. Ben has extensive experience in education and edtech prior to joining AoPS as my successor as CEO, including starting like I did as a classroom teacher. He has a deep understanding of the value of our work because he’s an AoPS parent! Meanwhile, Andrew and I have common roots as founders of education companies; he launched Quizlet at age 15! His journey from founder to MIT to technology and product leader as our Chief Product Officer traces a pathway many of our students will follow in the years to come.

Thank you again for your support for Art of Problem Solving and we look forward to working with millions more wonderful problem solvers in the years to come.

And special thanks to all of the amazing AoPS team members who have helped build AoPS. We’ve come a long way from here:IMAGE
1571 replies
rrusczyk
Mar 24, 2025
SmartGroot
Mar 26, 2025
k a March Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Mar 2, 2025
March is the month for State MATHCOUNTS competitions! Kudos to everyone who participated in their local chapter competitions and best of luck to all going to State! Join us on March 11th for a Math Jam devoted to our favorite Chapter competition problems! Are you interested in training for MATHCOUNTS? Be sure to check out our AMC 8/MATHCOUNTS Basics and Advanced courses.

Are you ready to level up with Olympiad training? Registration is open with early bird pricing available for our WOOT programs: MathWOOT (Levels 1 and 2), CodeWOOT, PhysicsWOOT, and ChemWOOT. What is WOOT? WOOT stands for Worldwide Online Olympiad Training and is a 7-month high school math Olympiad preparation and testing program that brings together many of the best students from around the world to learn Olympiad problem solving skills. Classes begin in September!

Do you have plans this summer? There are so many options to fit your schedule and goals whether attending a summer camp or taking online classes, it can be a great break from the routine of the school year. Check out our summer courses at AoPS Online, or if you want a math or language arts class that doesn’t have homework, but is an enriching summer experience, our AoPS Virtual Campus summer camps may be just the ticket! We are expanding our locations for our AoPS Academies across the country with 15 locations so far and new campuses opening in Saratoga CA, Johns Creek GA, and the Upper West Side NY. Check out this page for summer camp information.

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]March 5th (Wednesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, HCSSiM Math Jam 2025. Amber Verser, Assistant Director of the Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics, will host an information session about HCSSiM, a summer program for high school students.
[*]March 6th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar on Math Competitions from elementary through high school. Join us for an enlightening session that demystifies the world of math competitions and helps you make informed decisions about your contest journey.
[*]March 11th (Tuesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS Chapter Discussion MATH JAM. AoPS instructors will discuss some of their favorite problems from the MATHCOUNTS Chapter Competition. All are welcome!
[*]March 13th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar about Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus. Transform your summer into an unforgettable learning adventure! From elementary through high school, we offer dynamic summer camps featuring topics in mathematics, language arts, and competition preparation - all designed to fit your schedule and ignite your passion for learning.[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Friday, Mar 28 - Jul 18
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Jul 8
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21


Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jul 20
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 16 - Jun 8
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Monday, Mar 17 - Jun 9
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Tuesday, Mar 4 - Aug 12
Sunday, Mar 23 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Mar 16 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 23 - Aug 3
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Sunday, Mar 16 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Wednesday, Mar 5 - May 21
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Sunday, Mar 30 - Oct 5
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jun 15
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Tuesday, Mar 4 - May 20
Monday, Mar 31 - Jun 23
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Monday, Mar 24 - Jun 16
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Sunday, Mar 30 - Jun 22
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Mar 2, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
prove that $\angle Q L A=\angle M L A$
NJAX   3
N 8 minutes ago by Baimukh
Source: 2nd Al-Khwarizmi International Junior Mathematical Olympiad 2024, Day2, Problem7
Two circles with centers $O_{1}$ and $O_{2}$ intersect at $P$ and $Q$. Let $\omega$ be the circumcircle of the triangle $P O_{1} O_{2}$; the circle $\omega$ intersect the circles centered at $O_{1}$ and $O_{2}$ at points $A$ and $B$, respectively. The point $Q$ is inside triangle $P A B$ and $P Q$ intersects $\omega$ at $M$. The point $E$ on $\omega$ is such that $P Q=Q E$. Let $M E$ and $A B$ meet at $L$, prove that $\angle Q L A=\angle M L A$.

Proposed by Amir Parsa Hoseini Nayeri, Iran
3 replies
NJAX
May 31, 2024
Baimukh
8 minutes ago
Three Nagel points collinear
jayme   3
N 11 minutes ago by buratinogigle
Dear Marthlinkers,

1. ABCD a square
2. M a point on the segment CD sothat MA < MB
3. Nm, Na, Nb the Nagel’s points of the triangles MAD, ADM, BCM.

Prove : Nm, Na and Nb are collinear.

Sincerely
Jean-Louis
3 replies
jayme
Mar 31, 2025
buratinogigle
11 minutes ago
How many acute triangles can a right isosceles triangle be divided into?
truongphatt2668   3
N 15 minutes ago by truongphatt2668
Source: I don't know
How many acute triangles can a right isosceles triangle be divided into?
3 replies
truongphatt2668
Yesterday at 2:48 PM
truongphatt2668
15 minutes ago
sum(ab/4a^2+b^2) <= 3/5
truongphatt2668   4
N 17 minutes ago by truongphatt2668
Source: I remember I read it somewhere
Let $a,b,c>0$. Prove that:
$$\dfrac{ab}{a^2+4b^2} + \dfrac{bc}{b^2+4c^2} + \dfrac{ca}{c^2+4a^2} \le \dfrac{3}{5}$$
4 replies
truongphatt2668
Monday at 1:23 PM
truongphatt2668
17 minutes ago
Olympiad Geometry problem-second time posting
kjhgyuio   2
N 29 minutes ago by ND_
Source: smo problem
In trapezium ABCD,AD is parallel to BC and points E and F are midpoints of AB and DC respectively. If
Area of AEFD/Area of EBCF =√3 + 1/3-√3 and the area of triangle ABD is √3 .find the area of trapezium ABCD
2 replies
kjhgyuio
Today at 1:03 AM
ND_
29 minutes ago
D1010 : How it is possible ?
Dattier   13
N 35 minutes ago by Dattier
Source: les dattes à Dattier
Is it true that$$\forall n \in \mathbb N^*, (24^n \times B \mod A) \mod 2 = 0 $$?

A=1728400904217815186787639216753921417860004366580219212750904
024377969478249664644267971025952530803647043121025959018172048
336953969062151534282052863307398281681465366665810775710867856
720572225880311472925624694183944650261079955759251769111321319
421445397848518597584590900951222557860592579005088853698315463
815905425095325508106272375728975

B=2275643401548081847207782760491442295266487354750527085289354
965376765188468052271190172787064418854789322484305145310707614
546573398182642923893780527037224143380886260467760991228567577
953725945090125797351518670892779468968705801340068681556238850
340398780828104506916965606659768601942798676554332768254089685
307970609932846902
13 replies
Dattier
Mar 10, 2025
Dattier
35 minutes ago
Japanese Triangles
pikapika007   67
N an hour ago by quantam13
Source: IMO 2023/5
Let $n$ be a positive integer. A Japanese triangle consists of $1 + 2 + \dots + n$ circles arranged in an equilateral triangular shape such that for each $i = 1$, $2$, $\dots$, $n$, the $i^{th}$ row contains exactly $i$ circles, exactly one of which is coloured red. A ninja path in a Japanese triangle is a sequence of $n$ circles obtained by starting in the top row, then repeatedly going from a circle to one of the two circles immediately below it and finishing in the bottom row. Here is an example of a Japanese triangle with $n = 6$, along with a ninja path in that triangle containing two red circles.
IMAGE
In terms of $n$, find the greatest $k$ such that in each Japanese triangle there is a ninja path containing at least $k$ red circles.
67 replies
pikapika007
Jul 9, 2023
quantam13
an hour ago
D1018 : Can you do that ?
Dattier   1
N an hour ago by Dattier
Source: les dattes à Dattier
We can find $A,B,C$, such that $\gcd(A,B)=\gcd(C,A)=\gcd(A,2)=1$ and $$\forall n \in \mathbb N^*, (C^n \times B \mod A) \mod 2=0 $$.

For example :

$C=20$
$A=47650065401584409637777147310342834508082136874940478469495402430677786194142956609253842997905945723173497630499054266092849839$

$B=238877301561986449355077953728734922992395532218802882582141073061059783672634737309722816649187007910722185635031285098751698$

Can you find $A,B,C$ such that $A>3$ is prime, $C,B \in (\mathbb Z/A\mathbb Z)^*$ with $o(C)=(A-1)/2$ and $$\forall n \in \mathbb N^*, (C^n \times B \mod A) \mod 2=0 $$?
1 reply
Dattier
Mar 24, 2025
Dattier
an hour ago
n-gon function
ehsan2004   9
N 2 hours ago by AshAuktober
Source: Romanian IMO Team Selection Test TST 1996, problem 1
Let $ f: \mathbb{R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{R} $ be a function such that for every regular $ n $-gon $ A_1A_2 \ldots A_n $ we have $ f(A_1)+f(A_2)+\cdots +f(A_n)=0 $. Prove that $ f(x)=0 $ for all reals $ x $.
9 replies
ehsan2004
Sep 13, 2005
AshAuktober
2 hours ago
Iran geometry
Dadgarnia   37
N 2 hours ago by amirhsz
Source: Iranian TST 2018, first exam day 2, problem 4
Let $ABC$ be a triangle ($\angle A\neq 90^\circ$). $BE,CF$ are the altitudes of the triangle. The bisector of $\angle A$ intersects $EF,BC$ at $M,N$. Let $P$ be a point such that $MP\perp EF$ and $NP\perp BC$. Prove that $AP$ passes through the midpoint of $BC$.

Proposed by Iman Maghsoudi, Hooman Fattahi
37 replies
Dadgarnia
Apr 8, 2018
amirhsz
2 hours ago
Inequatity
mrmath2006   13
N 2 hours ago by KhuongTrang
Given $a,b,c>0$ & $(a+b+c)(\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c})=10$. Prove that
$(a^2+b^2+c^2)(\frac{1}{a^2}+\frac{1}{b^2}+\frac{1}{c^2})\ge \frac{27}{2}$
13 replies
mrmath2006
Jan 5, 2016
KhuongTrang
2 hours ago
weird 3-var cyclic ineq
RainbowNeos   1
N 2 hours ago by lbh_qys
Given $a,b,c\geq 0$ with $a+b+c=1$ and at most one of them being zero, show that
\[\frac{1}{\max(a^2,b)}+\frac{1}{\max(b^2,c)}+\frac{1}{\max(c^2,a)}\geq\frac{27}{4}\]
1 reply
RainbowNeos
Mar 28, 2025
lbh_qys
2 hours ago
Tangent Spheres and Tangents to Spheres
Math-Problem-Solving   2
N 2 hours ago by Math-Problem-Solving
Source: 2002 British Mathematical Olympiad Round 2
Prove this.
2 replies
Math-Problem-Solving
Today at 5:26 AM
Math-Problem-Solving
2 hours ago
Find all sequences satisfying two conditions
orl   33
N 2 hours ago by AshAuktober
Source: IMO Shortlist 2007, C1, AIMO 2008, TST 1, P1
Let $ n > 1$ be an integer. Find all sequences $ a_1, a_2, \ldots a_{n^2 + n}$ satisfying the following conditions:
\[ \text{ (a) } a_i \in \left\{0,1\right\} \text{ for all } 1 \leq i \leq n^2 + n;
\]

\[ \text{ (b) } a_{i + 1} + a_{i + 2} + \ldots + a_{i + n} < a_{i + n + 1} + a_{i + n + 2} + \ldots + a_{i + 2n} \text{ for all } 0 \leq i \leq n^2 - n.
\]
Author: Dusan Dukic, Serbia
33 replies
orl
Jul 13, 2008
AshAuktober
2 hours ago
Incenter lies on line
mofumofu   29
N Jan 23, 2025 by ErTeeEs06
Source: China TST 1 Day 1 Q3
Circle $\omega$ is tangent to sides $AB$,$AC$ of triangle $ABC$ at $D$,$E$ respectively, such that $D\neq B$, $E\neq C$ and $BD+CE<BC$. $F$,$G$ lies on $BC$ such that $BF=BD$, $CG=CE$. Let $DG$ and $EF$ meet at $K$. $L$ lies on minor arc $DE$ of $\omega$, such that the tangent of $L$ to $\omega$ is parallel to $BC$. Prove that the incenter of $\triangle ABC$ lies on $KL$.
29 replies
mofumofu
Jan 2, 2018
ErTeeEs06
Jan 23, 2025
Incenter lies on line
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: China TST 1 Day 1 Q3
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mofumofu
179 posts
#1 • 10 Y
Y by Mathuzb, tenplusten, anantmudgal09, R8450932, nguyendangkhoa17112003, GeoMetrix, amar_04, Adventure10, Mango247, Rounak_iitr
Circle $\omega$ is tangent to sides $AB$,$AC$ of triangle $ABC$ at $D$,$E$ respectively, such that $D\neq B$, $E\neq C$ and $BD+CE<BC$. $F$,$G$ lies on $BC$ such that $BF=BD$, $CG=CE$. Let $DG$ and $EF$ meet at $K$. $L$ lies on minor arc $DE$ of $\omega$, such that the tangent of $L$ to $\omega$ is parallel to $BC$. Prove that the incenter of $\triangle ABC$ lies on $KL$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Dukejukem
695 posts
#2 • 10 Y
Y by B.J.W.T, anantmudgal09, v_Enhance, igli.2001, nguyendangkhoa17112003, AlastorMoody, Arefe, IFA, AllanTian, Adventure10
Lemma: Let $ABCD$ be a cyclic quadrilateral with circumcenter $O.$ Denote $E \equiv AC \cap BD$ and $F \equiv AB \cap CD.$ Let $F'$ be the antipode of $F$ on $\odot(FBC).$ Then $O, E, F'$ are collinear.
[asy]
 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki, go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(12cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = 988.2182932954984, xmax = 1068.0180462919977, ymin = 1000.5589207237306, ymax = 1041.1134898172131;  /* image dimensions */
pen evefev = rgb(0.8980392156862745,0.9372549019607843,0.8980392156862745); pen qqwuqq = rgb(0.,0.39215686274509803,0.); 

filldraw((1028.992765986746,1028.5133767685782)--(1028.4445865189664,1027.9704143831332)--(1028.9875489044111,1027.4222349153533)--(1029.535728372191,1027.9651973007983)--cycle, evefev, linewidth(0.8) + qqwuqq); 
Label laxis; laxis.p = fontsize(10); 
xaxis(xmin, xmax, Ticks(laxis, Step = 2., Size = 2, NoZero),EndArrow(6), above = true); 
yaxis(ymin, ymax, Ticks(laxis, Step = 2., Size = 2, NoZero),EndArrow(6), above = true); /* draws axes; NoZero hides '0' label */ 
 /* draw figures */
draw(circle((1014.2460788614324,1012.8210610116407), 10.947073866713888), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw(circle((1013.8749203829444,1022.6412957550035), 16.54100464135123), linewidth(0.8) + linetype("2 2") + blue); 
draw((1003.8102533249038,1009.5147077917898)--(1019.3483333013737,1038.2504784872792), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((1019.3483333013737,1038.2504784872792)--(1024.901704683554,1010.3118650084917), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((1024.901704683554,1010.3118650084917)--(1011.2988442336773,1023.3639370088367), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((1011.2988442336773,1023.3639370088367)--(1046.2228815301826,1011.1177047633228), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((1046.2228815301826,1011.1177047633228)--(1019.3483333013737,1038.2504784872792), linewidth(0.8) + red); 
draw((1003.8102533249038,1009.5147077917898)--(1046.2228815301826,1011.1177047633228), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((1008.4015074645152,1007.0321130227279)--(1029.535728372191,1027.9651973007983), linewidth(0.8) + dotted); 
draw((1003.8102533249038,1009.5147077917898)--(1023.1321114660558,1019.2145616797301), linewidth(0.8)); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((1011.2988442336773,1023.3639370088367),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$A$", (1010.7688160201244,1023.6550206110503), N * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1003.8102533249038,1009.5147077917898),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$B$", (1002.803389444813,1008.3788600556578), W * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1024.901704683554,1010.3118650084917),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$C$", (1025.0629376826696,1009.0335526508889), E * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1023.1321114660558,1019.2145616797301),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$D$", (1023.2807189512073,1019.4358905528943), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1018.2024929102992,1016.7398214469407),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$E$", (1017.6430882700507,1017.3626973346624), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1019.3483333013737,1038.2504784872792),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F$", (1019.4980506232055,1038.4583476254425), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1014.2460788614324,1012.8210610116407),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$O$", (1014.3696252938954,1011.5795794101209), E * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1008.4015074645152,1007.0321130227279),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F'$", (1008.0045583958155,1005.5054869988102), E * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1046.2228815301826,1011.1177047633228),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$G$", (1046.7041651361415,1010.0519633545817), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((1029.535728372191,1027.9651973007983),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$M$", (1029.6821576601335,1028.2014969668219), NE * labelscalefactor); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */
[/asy]
Proof: Denote $G \equiv AD \cap BC$ and let $M$ be the Miquel point of $ABCD.$ It is known that $O, E, M$ are collinear, and $OM \perp FG.$ On the other hand, since $M \in \odot(FBC)$ and $\overline{FF'}$ is a diameter of this circle, we have $F'M \perp FG.$ Therefore, $O, E, F'$ are collinear. $\blacksquare$
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Main Proof: Let $I$ be the incenter of $\triangle ABC.$ Note that $AI$ is the perpendicular bisector of $\overline{DE}$; also, $F$ is the reflection of $D$ in $IB$ and $G$ is the reflection of $E$ in $IC.$ It follows that $IF = ID = IE = IG.$ Therefore, $DEGF$ is cyclic with circumcenter $I.$
[asy]
 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki, go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(15cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = 983.8150410180909, xmax = 1049.4664952960939, ymin = 997.8046374990395, ymax = 1031.1689818563664;  /* image dimensions */
pen fsfsfs = rgb(0.9490196078431372,0.9490196078431372,0.9490196078431372); pen evfuff = rgb(0.8980392156862745,0.9568627450980393,1.); pen qqzzff = rgb(0.,0.6,1.); 

filldraw((1002.3155835435821,1028.2479023843553)--(997.5658551273822,1009.082914299408)--(1021.4141418604702,1009.1493440674667)--cycle, fsfsfs, linewidth(0.8) + gray); 
filldraw((1007.5274341255129,1000.0825257520867)--(1014.231628649713,1016.3318572782222)--(998.261773264589,1011.8909196502241)--cycle, evfuff, linewidth(0.8) + qqzzff); 
Label laxis; laxis.p = fontsize(10); 
xaxis(xmin, xmax, Ticks(laxis, Step = 2., Size = 2, NoZero),EndArrow(6), above = true); 
yaxis(ymin, ymax, Ticks(laxis, Step = 2., Size = 2, NoZero),EndArrow(6), above = true); /* draws axes; NoZero hides '0' label */ 
 /* draw figures */
draw((1002.3155835435821,1028.2479023843553)--(997.5658551273822,1009.082914299408), linewidth(0.8) + gray); 
draw((997.5658551273822,1009.082914299408)--(1021.4141418604702,1009.1493440674667), linewidth(0.8) + gray); 
draw((1021.4141418604702,1009.1493440674667)--(1002.3155835435821,1028.2479023843553), linewidth(0.8) + gray); 
draw(circle((1007.5009198560632,1009.6011484845728), 9.518659660361699), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw(circle((1005.8396671765145,1015.5751042733898), 8.42601284582261), linewidth(0.8) + linetype("2 2") + red); 
draw((1007.5274341255129,1000.0825257520867)--(1014.231628649713,1016.3318572782222), linewidth(0.8) + qqzzff); 
draw((1014.231628649713,1016.3318572782222)--(998.261773264589,1011.8909196502241), linewidth(0.8) + qqzzff); 
draw((998.261773264589,1011.8909196502241)--(1007.5274341255129,1000.0825257520867), linewidth(0.8) + qqzzff); 
draw(circle((1005.8396671765147,1015.5751042733892), 6.469118046555144), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((998.261773264589,1011.8909196502241)--(1011.2565736725893,1009.121050005663), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((1000.4588001954772,1009.0909726422188)--(1014.231628649713,1016.3318572782222), linewidth(0.8)); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((1002.3155835435821,1028.2479023843553),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$A$", (1001.888641010759,1028.71528119511), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((997.5658551273822,1009.082914299408),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$B$", (996.6820079002883,1008.0982110047978), N * labelscalefactor); dot((1021.4141418604702,1009.1493440674667),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$C$", (1021.7277085523798,1008.217903719981), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((998.261773264589,1011.8909196502241),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$D$", (997.3702410125919,1012.0181474270487), N * labelscalefactor); dot((1014.231628649713,1016.3318572782222),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$E$", (1014.3366833898151,1016.5066242464201), NE * labelscalefactor); label("$\omega$", (1002.3973350502878,1016.835779213174), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((1007.4744055866134,1019.1197712170533),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$L$", (1007.334659551596,1019.6784811987758), N * labelscalefactor); dot((1000.4588001954772,1009.0909726422188),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$F$", (1000.1231734618063,1008.1281341835936), S * labelscalefactor); dot((1011.2565736725893,1009.121050005663),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$G$", (1011.4341350466218,1008.3974427927559), E * labelscalefactor); dot((1003.6144104727823,1010.7499935216292),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$K$", (1003.2351840565703,1011.2700679571535), NE * labelscalefactor); dot((1007.5274341255129,1000.0825257520867),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$S$", (1007.4244290879835,999.1811037236467), E * labelscalefactor); dot((1005.8396671765139,1015.5751042733895),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); label("$I$", (1005.9581933269889,1015.7585447765248), NE * labelscalefactor);
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */
[/asy]
Let $DF$ and $EG$ meet at $S.$ By the above observations, the sidelines of $\triangle SED$ are parallel to the sidelines of the intouch triangle of $\triangle ABC.$ Therefore, homothety carrying the incircle into $\omega$ carries the intouch triangle of $\triangle ABC$ into $\triangle SED.$ By homothety, we see that $S$ lies on major arc $\widehat{DE}$ of $\omega$, and the tangent to $\omega$ at $S$ is parallel to $BC.$ Therefore, $S$ and $L$ are antipodal points on $\omega.$ Applying the lemma to cyclic quadrilateral $DEGF$, we see that $I, K, L$ are collinear. $\square$
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by Dukejukem, Jan 3, 2018, 1:20 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
anantmudgal09
1979 posts
#3 • 4 Y
Y by Ankoganit, PHSH, Adventure10, MS_asdfgzxcvb
mofumofu wrote:
Circle $\omega$ is tangent to sides $AB$,$AC$ of triangle $ABC$ at $D$,$E$ respectively, such that $D\neq B$, $E\neq C$ and $BD+CE<BC$. $F$,$G$ lies on $BC$ such that $BF=BD$, $CG=CE$. Let $DG$ and $EF$ meet at $K$. $L$ lies on minor arc $DE$ of $\omega$, such that the tangent of $L$ to $\omega$ is parallel to $BC$. Prove that the incenter of $\triangle ABC$ lies on $KL$.

Suppose $DE$ is at variable distance $\lambda$ from $A$. Define $F, G$ as the reflections of $D, E$ in lines $BI, CI$ respectively. Let $S=DF \cap EG$ and $T=DE \cap BC$. Let $A_1, A_2$ be the touch-points of the incircle and $A$-excircle with $BC$. Observe that $\angle DFB=\angle DEG=90^{\circ}-\tfrac{1}{2}\angle B$ hence $DEFG$ is cyclic. Also $I$ is the center of the circle $\odot(DEFG)$.

Now by Brokard's Theorem, we know $IK \perp ST$. Note that $DLES$ is cyclic and is the image of the incircle under suitable homothety at $A$. Accordingly, we see $S \in AA_1, L \in AA_2$ and $T \in BC$ move with constant velocity. Hence we can find a spiral similarity with pivot $P$ such that $BC \mapsto AA_2$ and $T \mapsto S$. Let $Z$ be point at infinity with $ZP \perp ST$. Note that $L \mapsto Z$ is projective.

Thus, in order to prove $I, K, L$ collinear, it is equivalent to show $L \mapsto Z$ is a perspectivity about $I$. Hence it is enough to verify the result for three values of $\lambda \in \mathbb{R}$. If $DE$ is an intouch chord then we're done. Suppose $B=D$ (likewise let $C=E$ for the final case). Then $K=B$ and $\angle LDE=\tfrac{1}{2}\angle C$ hence $L$ lies on $BI$ and we're done. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MarkBcc168
1594 posts
#4 • 6 Y
Y by tenplusten, Cristiano-Ezio, k12byda5h, Adventure10, internationalnick123456, MS_asdfgzxcvb
Too easy for China TST P3. I will provide just a sketch since I am on mobile.

By easy angle chasing, $DEFG$ is cyclic and the intersection $DF\cap EG$ lies on $\omega$. By Reim, $LP$ is diameter of $\omega$.

Note that $I$ is the center of $\odot(DEFG)$. Now add Miquel point $M$ of $DEFG$ which lies on $IK$ and $\omega$. Note that $\angle LMP=90^{\circ}$ hence $I, K,L,M$ are colinear and we are done.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by MarkBcc168, Jan 2, 2018, 1:38 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6870 posts
#6 • 10 Y
Y by anantmudgal09, tenplusten, Cristiano-Ezio, RAMUGAUSS, v4913, thczarif, PHSH, Adventure10, Mango247, MS_asdfgzxcvb
It is also susceptible to straight barycentric coordinates.

Substitute $a=BC=v+w$, $b=CA=w+u$, $c=AB=u+v$. Let $X=(0:w:v)$, $Y=(w:0:u)$, $Z=(v:u:0)$ be the contact points of the incircle on $\overline{BC}$. Then we may set \begin{align*} D &= (v-t:u+t:0) \\ E &= (w-t:0:u+t) \\ F &= (0:w+t:v-t) \\ G &= (0:w-t:v+t) \end{align*}where $t=XF=XG=EY=DZ$.

We now solve for $K = (t:y:z)$, say. Since $K = \overline{DG} \cap \overline{EF}$ the standard determinants give \begin{align*} 	t(u+t)(v+t) &= (v-t)\left[ (v+t)y-(w-t)z \right] \\ 	t(u+t)(w+t) &= (w-t)\left[ -(v+t)y+(w+t)z \right]. \\ 	\implies 	t(u+t)\left[ (v+t)(w-t)+(w+t)(v+t) \right] &= 	\left[ -(w-t)^2(v-t)+(v+t)(w-t)(w+t) \right]z \\ 	z &= \frac{t(u+t)(v+t)(2w)} 	{(w-t)\left[ (v+t)(w+t)-(w-t)(v-t) \right]} \\ 	&= \frac{w(u+t)(v+t)}{(w-t)(v+w)}. \end{align*}Thus we recover \[ K = \left( \frac{t(v+t)}{u+t} : \frac{v(w+t)}{v-t} : 	\frac{w(v+t)}{w-t} \right). \]On the other hand, by homothety we have \begin{align*} 	\vec L &= \left( 1 + \frac tu \right) [2 \vec I - \vec X] - \frac tu \vec A \\ 	\left( 2u+2t \right) \vec I 	- u \vec L &= \left( u+t \right) \vec X + t \vec A \\ 	&= t \vec A + (u+t) \frac{w \vec B + v \vec C}{w+v} \\ \end{align*}Consequently the point $W = \frac{(2u+2t) \vec I - u \vec L}{u+2t} 	= \left( t(v+w) : w(u+t) : v(u+t) \right)$ lies on $\overline{IL}$ and is distinct from $I$ (since $u \neq 0$). Thus it is enough to show $W$, $K$, $I$ collinear: \begin{align*} 	\det \begin{bmatrix} 		\frac{t(v+w)}{u+t} & \frac{v(w+t)}{v-t} & \frac{w(v+t)}{w-t} \\ 		v+w & w+u & u+v \\ 		t(v+w) & w(u+t) & v(u+t) 	\end{bmatrix} 	&= 	\det \begin{bmatrix} 		0 & \frac{v(w+t)}{v-t}-w & \frac{w(v+t)}{w-t}-v \\ 		v+w & w+u & u+v \\ 		t(v+w) & w(u+t) & v(u+t) 	\end{bmatrix} \\ 	&= 	\det \begin{bmatrix} 		0 & \frac{v(w+t)}{v-t}-w & \frac{w(v+t)}{w-t}-v \\ 		v+w & w+u & u+v \\ 		0& u(w-t) & u(v-t) 	\end{bmatrix} \\ 	&= -(v+w) 	\det \begin{bmatrix} 		\frac{t(v+w)}{v-t} & \frac{t(v+w)}{w-t} \\ 		u(w-t) & u(v-t) 	\end{bmatrix} = 0. \end{align*}
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by v_Enhance, Jan 6, 2018, 6:16 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mosquitall
571 posts
#7 • 4 Y
Y by buratinogigle, enhanced, Adventure10, Mango247
My proof :

From simple angle chasing one can easily get that $\angle ((EDGF), (EDK)) = \angle ((EDGF), \omega)$. So in other words $(EDK)$ is inversion image of $\omega$ wrt $(EDGF)$, so $I$ is the inner homothety center of $\pi, (EDK)$. Now note that the tangent to $(EDK)$ from $K$ is parallel to $BC$, so from a homothety we get that $K, L, I$ are collinear. Done
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Mosquitall, Jan 7, 2018, 1:01 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
WizardMath
2487 posts
#8 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Solution.

Let $X=DF \cap EG$. Since $DEX$ and the intouch triangle of $ABC$ are homothetic, $X \in \omega$. Shooting lemma for $\omega$ and point $X$ implies $FGED$ is cyclic; its center is the intersection of the $\perp$ bisectors of $DF, EG$, i.e., $I$. Draw in the Miquel point of $FGED$, since it is the inverse of $K$ in $FGED$ and also the foot of $I$ the polar of $K$ wrt this circle, we get that the antipode of $X$ ($L$), $I$, $K$ are collinear. Done.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by WizardMath, Jan 9, 2018, 8:43 PM
Reason: Typo.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TelvCohl
2312 posts
#9 • 13 Y
Y by tenplusten, Pirkuliyev Rovsen, xdiegolazarox, enhanced, Cristiano-Ezio, nguyendangkhoa17112003, Sakura_jima.Mai, Avlon, k12byda5h, thczarif, PHSH, Adventure10, Mango247
Let $ Y, Z $ be the second intersection of $ \omega $ with $ EF, DG, $ respectively. Obviously, the incenter $ I $ of $ \triangle ABC $ is the circumcenter of $ DEFG, $ so simple angle chasing yields $ \measuredangle IFG = \measuredangle LYZ, $ $ \measuredangle IGF = \measuredangle LZY. $ On the other hand, by Reim's theorem we get $ FG \parallel YZ, $ so $ \triangle IFG $ and $ \triangle LYZ $ are homothetic $ \Longrightarrow I, L, K $ are collinear.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HHCN123
6 posts
#10 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
You can solve this question easily if using Simson theorm and what you need to do is to find the obvious circle of DEFG and prove two right angles.Maybe a little not natural but quite simple.China`s D1 questions are often easy.Then the whole solving is your task and I just offer an idea
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
math163
58 posts
#11 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
(redacted)
This post has been edited 5 times. Last edited by math163, Nov 10, 2018, 8:22 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
math163
58 posts
#13 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
(redacted)
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by math163, Nov 10, 2018, 8:21 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Cristiano-Ezio
9 posts
#14 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
It is easily to solve just by Pascal's theorem with circle DEFG. We could find that the incenter I of triangle ABC is the circumcenter of DEFG, and that make it natual to use Pascal's theorem.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
math_pi_rate
1218 posts
#15 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
My solution: Let $I$ be the incenter of $\triangle ABC$. Also let $DF \cap EG=T,\odot (FGT) \cap \omega=P,DE \cap BC=X$. Note that, as $AD=AE,BD=BF,CE=CG$, we have that $I$ lies on the perpendicular bisectors of $DE,DF,CG$, which in turn gives $ID=IE=IF=IG$. This means that $D,E,F,G$ lie on a circle centered at $I$. Also, $\angle BDT=\angle BFD=\angle DET \Rightarrow T$ lies on $\omega$, as $BD$ is tangent to $\omega$.

Now, $DE$ is antiparallel to $FG$ as well as to the tangent to $\omega$ at $T$, which means that the tangent to $\omega$ at $T$ is parallel to $BC$. This also gives that $L$ is the antipode of $T$ in $\omega$, and so $\measuredangle LPT=90^{\circ}$. But, $P$ is the Miquel Point of the degenerate cyclic quadrilateral $DEFG$, and so, by Brocard's Theorem, we get that $I$ is the orthocenter of $\triangle KTX$, and that $P$ lies on $TX$. Thus, $\measuredangle IPT=90^{\circ}=\measuredangle LPT \Rightarrow P,K,I,L$ are collinear. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by math_pi_rate, Oct 23, 2018, 1:51 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Jughead_0
6 posts
#16 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, Rounak_iitr
Different.

Let $I$ be the incenter of $\triangle ABC$; $F_1$, $G_1$ are reflections of $F$, $G$ in $I$.
Clearly, $I$ lies on perpendicular bisector of $DE$,$DF$,$EG$; so $DEFGF_1G_1$ is cyclic and center is $I$.

Claim: $D$, $L$, $F_1$ and $E$, $L$, $G_1$ are collinear.
Proof: I will prove that $\angle LDE= \angle F'DE$, which gives the first collinearity; second one follows similarly.
$$\angle LDE= \angle AEL=\angle (HE,BC)=\frac{1}2 \angle C$$$$\angle F'DE=\angle F'FE=90-\angle FF'E=90-\angle EGC=\frac{1}2 \angle C$$This completes the proof of claim. $\square$

Now, by Pascal's Theorem on $FF'DGG'E$, we get $K,I,L$ are collinear. $\square$
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by Jughead_0, May 25, 2019, 11:29 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TheUltimate123
1740 posts
#17 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, Rounak_iitr
[asy]
        size(5cm); defaultpen(fontsize(10pt));
        pen pri=deepblue;
        pen sec=deepcyan;
        pen tri=deepgreen;
        pen fil=invisible;
        pen sfil=invisible;
        pen tfil=invisible;

        pair A,B,C,I,D,EE,F,G,K,X,L,M;
        A=dir(110);
        B=dir(210);
        C=dir(330);
        I=incenter(A,B,C);
        D=(A+4B)/5;
        EE=reflect(A,I)*D;
        F=reflect(B,I)*D;
        G=reflect(C,I)*EE;
        K=extension(D,G,EE,F);
        X=extension(D,F,EE,G);
        L=extension(K,I,X,X+(0,1));
        M=foot(X,I,K);

        filldraw(circumcircle(D,F,G),tfil,tri);
        filldraw(circumcircle(D,EE,L),sfil,sec);
        filldraw(incircle(A,B,C),fil,pri);
        filldraw(D--X--EE--cycle,sfil,sec);
        draw(L--M--X,tri);
        draw(D--G,sec); draw(EE--F,sec);
        filldraw(A--B--C--cycle,fil,pri);

        dot("$A$",A,N);
        dot("$B$",B,SW);
        dot("$C$",C,SE);
        dot("$D$",D,W);
        dot("$I$",I,W);
        dot("$E$",EE,dir(30));
        dot("$F$",F,SW);
        dot("$G$",G,SE);
        dot("$K$",K,dir(110));
        dot("$X$",X,S);
        dot("$L$",L,N);
        dot("$M$",M,dir(240));
    [/asy]
Let $X=\overline{DF}\cap\overline{EG}$ and $M$ be the Miquel point of $DFGE$. Note that $\triangle XED$ and the contact triangle are homothetic at $A$, so $\overline{XL}$ is a diameter of $\omega$.

Since $ID=IE$, $ID=IF$, $IE=IG$ by construction, $I$ is the circumcenter of cyclic quadrilateral $DFGE$, thus by properties of the Miquel point, $I$, $K$, $M$ lie on a line perpendicular to $\overline{XM}$. But $\angle XML=90^\circ$, so $L$, $I$, $K$, $M$ are collinear, as desired
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by TheUltimate123, Dec 1, 2019, 2:27 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
william122
1576 posts
#18 • 2 Y
Y by Pappu123, Adventure10
We proceed with barycentric coordinates. Let $AD=AE=r$. Then, the coordinates of $F,G$ are $(0,a-c+r,c-r)$ and $(0,b-r,a-b+r)$ respectively, and the coordinates of $D,E$ are $(c-r,r,0)$, $(b-r,0,r)$ respectively. Computing a determinant, the equations of $EF$ and $DG$ are $$(a-b+r)rx-(a-b+r)(c-r)y+(b-r)(c-r)z=0$$$$(a-c+r)x+(b-r)(c-r)y-(a-c+r)(b-r)z=0$$Solving, we get that point $K$ has coordinates $$((a^2+2ar-ab-ac)(b-r)(c-r),r(b-r)(a+c-b)(a-c+r),r(c-r)(a+b-c)(a-b+r))$$Also, if we consider point $X=(0,s-b,s-c)$, the $A$-extouch point, note that $L$ is a homothety of $X$ wrt $A$ with factor $\frac{r}{s}$. So, it has coordinates $((s-r)a,r(s-b),r(s-c))$. Now, if we put the coordinates of $I,K,L$ into a determinant, we get a cubic in $r$, since it is easily verified that the quartic coefficient equals $0$. Thus, we just need to verify that the determinant is $0$ at $4$ points. We will choose $0,b,c,s-a$. At $0$, we have $$\begin{vmatrix}a&b&c\\(a^2-ab-ac)bc&0&0\\as&0&0\end{vmatrix}=0$$At $r=b$ we have $$\begin{vmatrix}a&b&c\\0&0&ab(c-b)(a+b-c)\\a(s-b)&b(s-b)&b(s-c)\end{vmatrix}=ab(c-b)(a+b-c)(ab(s-b)-ab(s-b))=0$$and we get a similar result for $r=c$. Finally, at $r=s-a$, we have $$\begin{vmatrix}a&b&c\\0&2(s-a)(s-c)^2(s-b)&2(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)^2\\a^2&(s-a)(s-b)&(s-a)(s-c)\end{vmatrix}\propto\begin{vmatrix}a&b&c\\0&(s-c)&(s-b)\\a^2&(s-a)(s-b)&(s-a)(s-c)\end{vmatrix}$$$$=a(s-c)^2(s-a)-a(s-b)^2(s-a)+b(s-b)a^2-c(s-c)a^2=0$$as desired.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by william122, Dec 29, 2019, 2:42 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
GeoMetrix
924 posts
#19 • 5 Y
Y by AlastorMoody, Pappu123, amar_04, Adventure10, Rounak_iitr
Maybe similiar to the others but since i like this ill post my solution anyways. :P
[asy]
 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(15cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = -17.64875782250771, xmax = 12.985228170215747, ymin = -10.078567823113621, ymax = 10.151798251301829;  /* image dimensions */
pen sexdts = rgb(0.1803921568627451,0.49019607843137253,0.19607843137254902); pen dtsfsf = rgb(0.8274509803921568,0.1843137254901961,0.1843137254901961); pen rvwvcq = rgb(0.08235294117647059,0.396078431372549,0.7529411764705882); pen wvvxds = rgb(0.396078431372549,0.3411764705882353,0.8235294117647058); pen wrwrwr = rgb(0.3803921568627451,0.3803921568627451,0.3803921568627451); 
 /* draw figures */
draw((-5.43637095285195,6.498396949998834)--(-8.57057841452274,-2.9320625037227908), linewidth(0.4) + sexdts); 
draw((-5.43637095285195,6.498396949998834)--(6.96,-2.55), linewidth(0.4) + sexdts); 
draw((6.96,-2.55)--(-8.57057841452274,-2.9320625037227908), linewidth(0.4) + sexdts); 
draw(circle((-2.756624790103522,-1.8758367417264656), 5.184106943530284), linewidth(0.4) + dtsfsf); 
draw(circle((-3.596878261132844,0.7499638003166852), 3.55859333554701), linewidth(0.4) + dtsfsf); 
draw((-3.596878261132844,0.7499638003166852)--(-8.57057841452274,-2.9320625037227908), linewidth(0.4) + rvwvcq); 
draw((-3.596878261132844,0.7499638003166852)--(6.96,-2.55), linewidth(0.4) + rvwvcq); 
draw((-7.676150691333448,-0.24083530163939865)--(-1.283252160384008,-2.7527894567191105), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-5.735469886770201,-2.8623169582879795)--(0.2997740533078106,2.311452466335568), linewidth(0.4) + rvwvcq); 
draw((-3.684395533087758,4.307480807290673)--(-3.5093609891779307,-2.8075532066573032), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-7.676150691333448,-0.24083530163939865)--(-5.735469886770201,-2.8623169582879795), linewidth(0.4) + wvvxds); 
draw((0.2997740533078106,2.311452466335568)--(-1.283252160384008,-2.7527894567191105), linewidth(0.4) + rvwvcq); 
draw((-5.43637095285195,6.498396949998834)--(-2.8841186772775,3.306702222014393), linewidth(0.4) + wrwrwr); 
draw(circle((-3.5968782949371954,0.7499637752913503), 4.197873997018878), linewidth(0.4) + linetype("4 4") + rvwvcq); 
draw((-7.676150691333448,-0.24083530163939865)--(0.2997740533078106,2.311452466335568), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-2.6291309029295515,-7.0583757054673235)--(-16.712165924866934,-3.132350942791587), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-2.8841186772775,3.306702222014393)--(-5.546903657206548,-6.2449680793904125), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-5.735469886770201,-2.8623169582879795)--(-2.6291309029295515,-7.0583757054673235), linewidth(0.4) + wvvxds); 
draw((-1.283252160384008,-2.7527894567191105)--(-2.6291309029295515,-7.0583757054673235), linewidth(0.4) + wvvxds); 
draw((-5.43637095285195,6.498396949998834)--(-2.6291309029295515,-7.0583757054673235), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-2.8841186772775,3.306702222014393)--(-2.6291309029295515,-7.0583757054673235), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-16.712165924866934,-3.132350942791587)--(-7.676150691333448,-0.24083530163939865), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-16.712165924866934,-3.132350942791587)--(-8.57057841452274,-2.9320625037227908), linewidth(0.4)); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((-5.43637095285195,6.498396949998834),dotstyle); 
label("$A$", (-5.3553790280251805,6.690555678098006), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-8.57057841452274,-2.9320625037227908),dotstyle); 
label("$B$", (-8.498346422083822,-2.738346504077927), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((6.96,-2.55),dotstyle); 
label("$C$", (7.037460759940218,-2.3603947288430267), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-3.596878261132844,0.7499638003166852),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$I$", (-3.5252967479404025,0.9019258573950597), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-7.676150691333448,-0.24083530163939865),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$D$", (-7.603197480738006,-0.07279187873705148), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((0.2997740533078106,2.311452466335568),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$E$", (0.3735741965880374,2.4734095544243817), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-3.5093609891779307,-2.8075532066573032),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$T$", (-3.4258357544575344,-2.6388855105950584), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-1.498834977839814,3.62429866411189),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$M$", (-1.4167236861035932,3.786294668398246), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-6.973851822223395,1.8722989086934119),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$J$", (-6.887078327661354,2.0357811830997603), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-5.735469886770201,-2.8623169582879795),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F$", (-5.653762008473786,-2.6985621066847796), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-1.283252160384008,-2.7527894567191105),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$G$", (-1.1979095004412827,-2.599101113201911), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-3.684395533087758,4.307480807290673),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$K$", (-3.604865542726697,4.462629424081752), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-2.8841186772775,3.306702222014393),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$L$", (-2.8091775948637503,3.468019489253067), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-4.24854799053207,-1.5876392286151881),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$K$", (-4.16184710623076,-1.425461390104063), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-2.6291309029295515,-7.0583757054673235),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$N$", (-2.5505790118082925,-6.8958160316618295), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-16.712165924866934,-3.132350942791587),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$O$", (-16.634255688982453,-2.9770528884368113), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-5.546903657206548,-6.2449680793904125),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$P$", (-5.474732220204623,-6.080235885102308), NE * labelscalefactor); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */
[/asy]
Proof: Firstly we give a defination of few points. Let $DF \cap GE=N$ and $DE \cap FG=O$. Let $J,M,T$ be the touchpoints of the incircle with $AB,AC,BC$.
Firstly notice that $\Delta DNE$ and $\Delta JTM$ are homothetic and so taking a homothety centred at $A$ s.t. $\odot(I) \mapsto \omega \implies N \in  \omega$. Also $\{A,T,N\}$ is a collinear triplet $\implies L$ is the $N$-Antipode w.r.t $\omega$. Now let $P$ be the miquel point of quaderilaeral $DEGF$. Notice that $ID=IF=IG=IE \implies I$ is the centre of $\odot(DFGE)$. Now its well known that $K,P$ are inverses w.r.t $\odot(DEFG)\implies \{I,K,P\}$ is a collinear triplet. By brocard we have that $\angle IPN=90^\circ$. Now notice that since $L$ is the $N$-antipode $\implies \angle LPN=90^\circ \implies \{L,I,K,P\}$ is a collinear triplet as desired.$\blacksquare$.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by GeoMetrix, Jan 5, 2020, 1:29 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
stroller
894 posts
#20 • 3 Y
Y by amar_04, Gaussian_cyber, Adventure10
Overcomplicated but different
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Plops
946 posts
#21 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Not an answer. Just a question.

Edit: Because the problem is a cyclic quad problem.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Plops, Feb 22, 2020, 12:57 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
khina
993 posts
#22
Y by
@above the fact that u can reduce ll the incenter stuff to focus just on the quad. because we kmow so much about miquel theory, it makes sense to focus on a structure we already know a lot about
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
amar_04
1915 posts
#23 • 5 Y
Y by GeoMetrix, Hexagrammum16, Bumblebee60, Mango247, VIATON
Too easy for China TST P3. Anyways really Nice Problem. :)
mofumofu wrote:
Circle $\omega$ is tangent to sides $AB$,$AC$ of triangle $ABC$ at $D$,$E$ respectively, such that $D\neq B$, $E\neq C$ and $BD+CE<BC$. $F$,$G$ lies on $BC$ such that $BF=BD$, $CG=CE$. Let $DG$ and $EF$ meet at $K$. $L$ lies on minor arc $DE$ of $\omega$, such that the tangent of $L$ to $\omega$ is parallel to $BC$. Prove that the incenter of $\triangle ABC$ lies on $KL$.

Note that after Simple Angle Chasing $DFGE$ we get that $DFGE$ is a cyclic quadrilateral. So, $\angle EGC=\angle GEC=\angle FDE$, now as $AC$ is tangent to $\omega$, hence it's obvious that $DF\cap EG=X\in\omega$. Now it's easy to notice that $L$ is the $K-\text{Antipode}$ WRT $\omega$. Let $LK\cap\omega=Y$, then it's well known that $Y$ is the Miquel Point of $DEGF$. So, the Circumcenter $(O)$ of $DEGF$ must lie on $LK$, and if $T$ is the Circumcenter of $\omega$ then $AT$ is the perpendicular bisector of $ED$. Hence, $ED\cap LY=O$. Hence, $OD=OF=OE=OG$. Hence, $BO,CO$ are the $B,C$ angle bisectors of $\triangle ABC$. So, $O\equiv I\in LK$. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by amar_04, Feb 26, 2020, 2:11 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AlastorMoody
2125 posts
#24 • 1 Y
Y by gamerrk1004
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Aryan-23
558 posts
#25 • 2 Y
Y by A-Thought-Of-God, VIATON
Easy for a China #3 ? Interesting problem though.

Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Idio-logy
206 posts
#26
Y by
Here is a moving points approach.

First, by easy angle chasing we get $DF, EG$ concur at a point $M$ on $\omega$, and points $D,E,F,G$ all lie on a circle centered at $I$. Let $DE,BC$ intersect at $T$, and let $TM$ intersect $\omega$ again at $N$. By Brokard's theorem, $KI$ passes through $N$, so it suffices to prove that $LI$ also passes through $N$. This can be deduced from the following claim:

Claim. Let $X = \mu D + (1-\mu)E$, $Y = \mu F + (1-\mu) G$ for some real number $\mu$. Denote the line through $X$ perpendicular to $DE$ by $\ell_1$, and denote the line through $Y$ perpendicular to $FG$ by $\ell_2$. Suppose $\ell_1 \cap \ell_2 = Z$. Then then as $\mu$ varies, $Z$ moves on the line $NL$ linearly. In particular, taking $\mu = 0.5$, we have $N,I,L$ collinear.

Proof. Let $\phi_1$ denote the linear map that sends $X$ to the point $Z_1 = \ell_1 \cap NL$, and let $\phi_2$ denote the linear map that sends $Y$ to the point $Z_2 = \ell_2 \cap NL$. It suffices to verify that $\phi_1, \phi_2$ coincide for two distinct values of $\mu$:
  • Take $\mu = 1$, then $\ell_1,\ell_2$ intersect on $NL$ because $T,D,F,N$ are concyclic.
  • Take $\mu = 0$, then $\ell_1,\ell_2$ intersect on $NL$ because $T,E,G,N$ are concyclic. $\square$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Lcz
390 posts
#27
Y by
Not the best solution, but...

Bary wrt $\Delta ABC$. Let $AD=AE=t$ so that
$\quad$-by lengths $D=(c-t:t:0)$, $E=(b-t:0:t)$, $F=(0:a-c+t:c-t)$, $G=(0:b-t:a-b+t)$.
$\quad$-by a homothety from $A$ with factor $\frac{t}{s}$ sending the $A$-excircle touch point $(0:s-b:s-c)$ to $L$ we get $L=(a(s-t):t(s-b):t(s-c))$.
Since $I=(a:b:c)$ it remains to compute $K$, the intersection of $$DG: t(a-b+t)x-(c-t)(a-b+t)y+(b-t)(c-t)z=0$$$$EF: t(a-c+t)x+(b-t)(c-t)y-(b-t)(a-c+t)z=0$$and solving we get $$K=(a(b-t)(c-t)(a+2t-b-c): t(a-c+t)(a-b+c)(b-t): t(a-b+t)(a+b-c)(c-t))$$Now to show the determinant $[IKL]=0$:
-divide the first column by $a$.
-multiply the first row by $t$, then divide the second and third columns by $t$
-add the first row to the second, then divide the second by $s$
-subtract $t$ times the second row from the first.
Now we have $$\begin{pmatrix}
  0 & b-t & c-t\\ 
  1 & 1 & 1\\
  (b-t)(c-t)(a+2t-b-c) & (a-c+t)(a-b+c)(b-t) & (a-b+t)(a+b-c)(c-t)
\end{pmatrix}$$
$$=(b-t)(c-t)(0)=0.$$where everything cancels (yay!)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
L567
1184 posts
#28
Y by
We have $\angle (DF, EG) = 180 - \angle DFB - \angle EGC = 90 - \frac{\angle BAC}{2} = \angle ADE$, which is the measure of arc $DE$, so we have $X = DF \cap EG \in \omega$. So, $\angle BFD = \angle BDX = \angle DEG$ so $DFEG$ is cyclic.

Note that since $I$ lies on the perpendicular bisectors of $EG, DF$, it must in fact be the circumcenter (since the quadrilateral is cyclic). Let $M$ be the miquel point of $DFEG$, which lies on $\omega$. It's well known that $I,K,M$ must be collinear, so it suffices to show that $MI$ goes through $L$. Since $IK \perp XM$, we must have that $MI \cap \omega$ is the antipode of $X$, so it suffices to show that the tangent at $X$ to $\omega$ is parallel to $BC$. But this is true since if $Z$ is a point on the tangent, then $\angle FXZ = \angle DXZ = \angle DEG = \angle DFB$, so we are done. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Om245
163 posts
#29 • 3 Y
Y by Deadline, GeoKing, Rounak_iitr
Let $I$ be incenter of $\triangle ABC$
Claim: $D,F,G,E$ lie on circle with center as $I$.

$$\angle FDE = 180 - \angle EDA - \angle BDF = 90 - \frac{\angle C}{2} = \angle CGE$$hence $D,F,E,G$ cyclic.Note $I$ lie on perpendicular bisector of $DE$ and by condition $BD=BF$ and $CE=CG$ we have $I$ also lie on perpendicular bisector of $GF$ also from fact that $IB$ and $IC$ are angle bisector we have $I$ as center of $(DEF)$

Let $T=DF \cap GE$
Claim : $T$ lie on $(DLE)$ with $\angle TDL = \angle LET = 90$

Let perpendicular from $L$ to $BC$ meet at $H$.If $O$ is center of $(DLE)$ then $O,E,B,H$ cyclic.
$$\angle LOD = \angle CBA \implies \angle ODL = 90 - \frac{\angle B}{2} \implies \angle EDL = \frac{\angle C}{2}$$hence $\angle FDL = \angle FDE + \angle EDL = 90$

Claim : $L,I,K$ are collinear.
Let $M=(TGF)\cap (DTE)$. Then $M$ is miquel point point of $\Box DEGF$. hence $\overline{I-K-M}$ (well know property)
as $LT$ is diameter $\angle TML = 90$, but it's well know that $\angle TMI = 90$ hence $\overline{L-I-M}$

Hence $L,I,K$ are collinear $\blacksquare$


[asy]

 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(19.07651842087848cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = -4.322575073781325, xmax = 22.753943347097152, ymin = -11.155828560285837, ymax = 3.1133695277123317;  /* image dimensions */
pen ffxfqq = rgb(1.,0.4980392156862745,0.); 

draw((6.993497304868754,1.7930527604426043)--(4.74121400092014,-6.783937749194878)--(15.721214000920138,-6.883937749194877)--cycle, linewidth(0.4) + ffxfqq); 
 /* draw figures */
draw((6.993497304868754,1.7930527604426043)--(4.74121400092014,-6.783937749194878), linewidth(0.4) + ffxfqq); 
draw((4.74121400092014,-6.783937749194878)--(15.721214000920138,-6.883937749194877), linewidth(0.4) + ffxfqq); 
draw((15.721214000920138,-6.883937749194877)--(6.993497304868754,1.7930527604426043), linewidth(0.4) + ffxfqq); 
draw(circle((10.260220799534883,-3.6489912612960405), 6.347229752037104), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((xmin, -3.673826499279709*xmin + 27.485948481710658)--(xmax, -3.673826499279709*xmax + 27.485948481710658), linewidth(0.4)); /* line */
draw(circle((8.962592300056919,-5.441060612478726), 3.7418809170599285), linewidth(0.4) + red); 
draw((5.343414536894738,-4.490679049058201)--(9.911189132387893,-6.831023132905878), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((7.11212409920384,-6.805530737339539)--(11.600778937775456,-2.7874509836861616), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((xmin, -0.009107468123861607*xmin-1.6173979879750853)--(xmax, -0.009107468123861607*xmax-1.6173979879750853), linewidth(0.4)); /* line */
draw((xmin, 4.764129681840161*xmin-44.56063720954149)--(xmax, 4.764129681840161*xmax-44.56063720954149), linewidth(0.4) + green); /* line */
draw(circle((8.538392964454843,-3.8826258523669748), 3.2523246828354737), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((xmin, 0.27219576106712146*xmin-5.945133835625384)--(xmax, 0.27219576106712146*xmax-5.945133835625384), linewidth(0.4)); /* line */
draw((5.343414536894738,-4.490679049058201)--(8.996669947959758,-1.6993348727470368), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((8.996669947959758,-1.6993348727470368)--(11.600778937775456,-2.7874509836861616), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((7.11212409920384,-6.805530737339539)--(8.996669947959758,-1.6993348727470368), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((8.996669947959758,-1.6993348727470368)--(9.911189132387893,-6.831023132905878), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((5.343414536894738,-4.490679049058201)--(8.928514652154083,-9.182786352210424), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((11.600778937775456,-2.7874509836861616)--(8.928514652154083,-9.182786352210424), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((8.996669947959758,-1.6993348727470368)--(8.928514652154083,-9.182786352210424), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw(circle((8.504315316552006,-7.624351592098668), 1.6151359007370965), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((4.74121400092014,-6.783937749194878)--(-2.8283481155758152,-6.714998203507301), linewidth(0.4)); 
draw((-2.8283481155758152,-6.714998203507301)--(8.928514652154083,-9.182786352210424), linewidth(0.4)); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((6.993497304868754,1.7930527604426043),dotstyle); 
label("$A$", (7.05464745517935,1.9534013089775137), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((4.74121400092014,-6.783937749194878),dotstyle); 
label("$B$", (4.115001969344539,-6.643075490139423), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((15.721214000920138,-6.883937749194877),dotstyle); 
label("$C$", (15.603454327498964,-6.357055929355495), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.962592300056919,-5.441060612478726),dotstyle); 
label("$O$", (9.215684136657915,-5.4354373446072834), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((5.343414536894738,-4.490679049058201),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$D$", (4.9253907248990005,-4.243689174674252), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((11.600778937775456,-2.7874509836861616),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$E$", (11.901090012907012,-2.527571809970686), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((9.911189132387893,-6.831023132905878),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$G$", (9.962512989815947,-6.023366441774246), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((7.11212409920384,-6.805530737339539),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F$", (6.879857723589172,-6.372945904954602), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.996669947959758,-1.6993348727470368),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$L$", (9.311023990252556,-1.4152735180331897), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.538392964454843,-3.882625852366973),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$I$", (8.738984868684701,-3.957669613890324), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.112914677045005,-5.9096595903947025),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$K$", (8.500635234698095,-5.880356661382282), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.928514652154083,-9.182786352210424),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$T$", (9.199794161058806,-9.598610951573342), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((10.202416004181245,-9.995957791125791),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$A'$", (10.264422526198981,-9.868740536758162), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((7.489289618033217,-8.880690244372106),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$M$", (7.213547211170421,-8.45453270843763), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-2.8283481155758152,-6.714998203507301),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$R$", (-2.76535746506883,-6.595405563342101), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((8.950012986401948,-6.822269251794895),linewidth(4.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$H$", (8.389405405504345,-6.54773563654478), NE * labelscalefactor); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */
[/asy]
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
L13832
254 posts
#30
Y by
Finally done after :wallbash: and :censored:
https://wiki-images.artofproblemsolving.com//7/7b/POTD_-1000.png
Let $DF\cap EG=J$ and $DE\cap FG=S$, we have $\odot(DEGF)$ with center $I$. Note that the $J$ is $L$-antipode this is because $\triangle DEJ$ and contact triangle are homothetic with center $A$, so $\overline{A-J-N}$.
Now let the miquel point of $\odot(DEGF)$ be $M$ which is also $\odot(DJE)\cap \odot(FJG)$, then $\overline{I-K-M}$ and finally by Brokard's theorem we have $\angle IMJ=90^{\circ}$ because $J$ is the $L$-antipode we have $\angle LMJ=90^{\circ}$, so $\overline{L-I-K-M}$ and we are done!
Remark
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by L13832, Sep 26, 2024, 12:46 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pinetree1
1207 posts
#31 • 2 Y
Y by anantmudgal09, abeot
Here is an alternative solution using my favorite technique, the ``radical axis trick'': if you don't know how to prove three points are collinear, try to throw them on a radical axis. While there are certainly more natural solutions (see all above posts), this problem is still a nice showcase of the method.

Claim: Points $D$, $E$, $F$, and $G$ lie on a circle with center $I$.

Proof. From the given length conditions, we immediately deduce that $ID = IF$ and $IE = IG$. But we also have $ID = IE$ from the definition of $\omega$. $\blacksquare$

[asy]
	size(300);
    defaultpen(fontsize(10pt));
    pair A, B, C, D, E, F, G, I, O, K, L, X, Y, MA;
    real r = 0.47;
    A = dir(120);
    B = dir(210);
    C = dir(330);
    I = incenter(A, B, C);
    O = (1+r)*I - r*A;
    D = foot(O, A, B);
    E = foot(O, A, C);
    F = 2*foot(D, B, I) - D;
    G = 2*foot(E, C, I) - E;
    K = extension(D, G, E, F);
    L = O + abs(O-D)*dir(90);
    MA = dir(270);
    X = 2*foot(MA, D, L) - D;
    Y = 2*foot(MA, E, L) - E;
    draw(A--B--C--cycle, orange);
    draw(circumcircle(A, B, C), red);
    draw(CP(O, D), heavyred);
    draw(D--G^^E--F, lightblue);
    draw(circumcircle(B, D, I), lightblue+dashed);
    draw(circumcircle(C, E, I), lightblue+dashed);
    draw(D--L--Y, heavycyan);
    draw(circumcircle(D, F, G), dotted+heavygreen);
    draw(K--L, dotted+magenta);
    dot("$A$", A, dir(A));
    dot("$B$", B, dir(180));
    dot("$C$", C, dir(0));
    dot("$D$", D, dir(130));
    dot("$E$", E, dir(50));
    dot("$I$", I, dir(120));
    dot("$F$", F, dir(300));
    dot("$G$", G, dir(315));
    dot("$K$", K, dir(270));
    dot("$L$", L, dir(90));
    dot("$X$", X, dir(90));
    dot("$Y$", Y, dir(60));
    dot("$M_A$", MA, dir(270));
[/asy]

Remark: If we are looking to apply the radical axis trick, we now know that $K$ automatically lies on the radical axis of any two circles $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$ with $D, G\in \omega_1$ and $E, F\in \omega_2$. So there are two natural choices: $\omega_1 = (DGI)$ and $\omega_2 = (EFI)$, or $\omega_1 = (DGL)$ and $\omega_2 = (EFL)$. Trying both briefly should convince you that the first option is much easier.

At this point, we make the following observations:
  • Since $DI = IG$ and $\overline{BI}$ bisects $\angle DBG$, $B\in (DGI)$. Similarly, $C\in (EFI)$. (This is another of my favorite tricks.)
  • Straightforward angle chasing yields $\overline{DL}\parallel \overline{BI}$ and $\overline{EL}\parallel \overline{CI}$. (For example, the homothety at $A$ sending $\omega$ to the $A$-excircle sends $L$, $D$, $E$ to the excircle tangency points.)
To finish, let $X = \overline{DL}\cap (DGI)\neq D$ and $Y = \overline{EK}\cap (EFI)\neq E$. It suffices to show that $DXEY$ is cyclic; then $K$, $I$, $L$ will all lie on the radical axis of $(DGI)$ and $(EFI)$.

We will show that $D$, $X$, $E$, $Y$ all lie on a circle with center $M_A$, the midpoint of arc $BC$. First note that $M_AD = M_AE$, by the definition of $\omega$. Furthermore, from the parallel lines, we see that $BDXI$ and $CYEI$ are isosceles trapezoids. Hence $DX$ and $BI$ share a perpendicular bisector, and so if $M_A$ is the midpoint of arc $BC$, we must have $M_AD = M_AX$. Similarly, we get $M_AE = M_AY$, which completes the proof.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ErTeeEs06
45 posts
#32
Y by
Let $I$ denote the incenter of $\triangle ABC$.

$$\angle EDF=180^\circ-\angle ADE-\angle FDB=\frac{\alpha}{2}+\frac{\beta}{2}=90^\circ-\frac{\gamma}{2}=180^\circ-\angle EGF$$. This implies $DEGF$ is cyclic. Obviously $I$ is on the perpendicular bisector of $DE$ and you can play around with lengths to easily show that the $A$-intouch point is the midpoint of $FG$ which implies $I$ is on perpendicular bisector of $FG$. Combining these claims imply $I$ is the center of $(DEGF)$. From there we also get that $I$ is on $(BDG)$ and on $(CEF)$. Let $DG$ intersect $\omega$ again in $S$. Because the tangent in $L$ is parallel to $BC$ we know that $\angle ADL=\frac{\beta}{2}$. So $\angle DSL=\frac{\beta}{2}$. Also $\angle DGI=\angle DBI=\frac{\beta}{2}$, so $\angle DSL=\angle DGI$ which implies $SL\parallel GI$. Now with Reim we conclude that $K, I, L$ are collinear and we are done.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a