ka May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.
Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.
Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!
Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.
Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)
Intermediate: Grades 8-12
Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Let be an acute triangle. Let be any point on the side . On line , choose any point . Let and be the tangents from to the circumcircle of , and let and be the tangents from to the circumcircle of . Find the locus of the intersection of and .
Let be a nonempty subset of the points in the Cartesian plane such that for each exactly one of or also belongs to . Prove that for each positive integer there is a line in the plane (possibly different lines for different ) which contains at least points of .
Let be a set of distinct real numbers. Let be the set of numbers that occur as averages of two distinct
elements of . For a given , what is the smallest possible number of elements in ?
1.)
Suppose is differentiable and Show that for some
3.)
Suppose is differentiable with If then show that
4.)
Let be the unit circle in the complex plane. Let be the map given by We define and for The smallest positive integer such that is called period of Determine the total number of points of period
6.)
Let denote the set of natural numbers, and let be nine distinct tuples in Show that there are distinct elements in the set whose product is a perfect cube.
8.)
Let and let be positive integers such that Prove that and determine when equality holds.
Let continuous such that , and .
1)Prove that we can find such that :
2) Let such that for all .
Prove that we can find a power series and an extractrice such that :
3) for every continuous function there is an extractrice such that converge uniformely to in
3) is a conclusion of the above
it seems a more powerful version of weistrass theorem .
Let"s have a 3xn matrice with the following properties:
The firs row of the matrice is 1,2,3,... ,n in this order.
The second and the third rows are permutations of the first.
Very important, that in each column thera are different entries.
How many matrices with thees properties are there?
The answer for 2xn matrices is well-known, but what is the answer for 3xn, or for kxn ( k<=n) ?
Y byAmir Hossein, sa2001, AopsUser101, YC1math, ashrith9sagar_1, Commander_Anta78, Adventure10
The only functions which work are the identity and the zero-function. It is clear that both satisfy the equation. Now we show any valid function that is not zero is the identity. Suppose for some .
If then but is not a solution. So .
Put so . Put so for all ; hence is surjective over . Suppose then implies . So is injective at .
Now so . Put to get for all so for all integers . Now so for all integers . Consequently, is surjective over all of .
Plug to conclude . Put so hence for all . For , last claim is obvious. Now surjectivity shows for all so is multiplicative.
Thus, and hence preserves the sign of the argument. Now pick and so hence and hence so for all . Now suppose for some .
1. If .
Now for sufficiently large, hence which fails as .
2. If .
Again for sufficiently large, hence which fails as .
Finally, shifting down by large integers , we obtain for all as desired.
Y byAmir Hossein, ImbecileMathImbaTation, Adventure10
Easy for P3 (if problems order in difficult)and simple solution.
Let be the assertion of then or For all Indeed this solution work. such that them from
Then from both condition we can get
Lemma:
Proof: we know let show As desired.
From
From for all but contradiction. From lemma we get
Then (or )
Then our equation equivalent to
From
Also from then we get
From use we get
Then for all Indeed this solution work.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by falantrng, Dec 28, 2018, 8:50 AM Reason: Typo
Nice problem. Here's my solution: Let denote the given assertion. Note that the only constant function which satisfies the given equation is the zero function. So from now on we assume that is non-constant.
CLAIM For , we have .
Proof: Note that we have Also, If , then using the first relation, we get that either or . But, when , we have , which contradicts the fact that is non-constant. That means implies . And, when , then (again from the first relation), we get . Summarizing the above, we can say that and are both true simultaneously.
Now, suppose that . Then .
Return to the problem at hand. Then we get
Now, . Using our Claim, we get that as . Then
Finally, Putting in , and using the above relation, we get that
Using and , we can easily find that . Thus, our final answers are Now one can easily verify that these solutions actually work. Hence, done.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by math_pi_rate, Dec 20, 2018, 11:10 AM
I think this solution is more elementary than the others, although many parts are similar to the given above. Solution
Let denote the assertion.
gives us .
If , then we can put to be any real number, and the function would be constant , which clearly is false. Thus, .
now gives us , and we get or . From now on, we are supposing .
. But one can see easily that if , then implies . So the only possibility is here.
. This implies three important things: and using we get . (This is not really useful here, but funny ) It simplifies a lot our first functional equation, and we are now looking at . .
With and , setting integer , we get .
Now, it remains to prove that , for nonzero real . In fact, it would imply , and furthermore, , contradiction!
Thus, the solutions are . Verification is trivial.
Sorry for double posting, but I have a different ending after proving the claim in post #4. Here's my solution: As proved in post #4, we have and that is non-constant. Now, Again, as shown in post #4, one easily gets that . Thus, we have , i.e. is odd. We will show that is injective also. Suppose we have for some . Then However, we cannot have , as is odd. Hence, must be injective.
Now, as , so we can rewrite the problem condition as Then, gives that . This means that is surjective for . But, as , so we get that is in fact always surjective. Now, using injectivity, one can easily prove that , and so we have However, as is surjective, so we can take , giving that is multiplicative also. Let (As is surjective, so is also surjective). Then, using multiplicity, we have But, , and so we get where we use that . This means that is both additive and multiplicative, in which case it is well known that must be the identity function. Hence, done.
are the only functions. They can be trivially checked to be true.
Solution
Let be the assertion that . gives so or . If , then gives . Hence we have . Now gives . This gives or . If then gives or . This solution works. So assume otherwise that . Hence gives that . Now either or . Now if then gives contradiction. Hence, . If , then gives or . This also proves that only can be and no other value of gives . Hence . Now gives which gives for all integers. Now, where gives . Hence for rationals. Now, from applying we can see that . Put to get that . Now can be or . Suppose that there exists nonzero for which . Put to get that . Of course as is not equal to this equation implies that . This implies that or contradiction. Hence for nonzero . This with gives that the only solutions are and .
Edit: Just realised that my solution is similar to @2above.
This post has been edited 7 times. Last edited by Mathotsav, May 22, 2019, 11:45 AM
Answers: and .
Clearly both these functions satisfy, so we continue by proving them to be the only ones. Denote by the assertion . . Now, (which is a solution) or . Assuming to be non-constant,
take . Now suppose there exists such that . Then, , contradiction and thus is injective at is surjective over .
Now, . We now show that is injective. Indeed, if , then . So suppose . Then we get that . Using surjectivity, pick such that . Then we have , contradiction is injective. Now using similar arguments get that which implies is a bijection on . Then and using (obtainable from ) we establish which in turn implies and moreover, is multiplicative is Cauchy and multiplicative and thus is identity.
We show that the only functions satisfying this are and . These can be easily verified.
Clearly, if is a constant function, then we must have . So assume that is nonconstant for the rest of the solution.
Let denote the assertion Observe that and give and . Now gives which turns our equation into Denote the above assertion by . Note that is which implies that is injective. Now, by way of and , we find that Injectivity now implies that is odd. Also note that now is also surjective. Now from and we find that
Recall that we also had . Therefore, for any two reals we have so that is additive as well as multiplicative. Now it is not hard to see that , so we are done.
. It's easy to see that these are indeed solutions to the given FE. Let be the given assertion, we have if , we will have for some real number , plugging it into our FE, which means and for all real . If , then . If there exists a real number , such that , then which if for all real , then . So, is injective at and is not the zero function. Then, but since ,. Now, by comparing and , we have but again , so this also holds for all real . Plugging this back to our original FE, we have and Most importantly, is odd since Therefore, since is odd and , is surjective over . This means is multiplicative and in particular, . Finally, as this implies (it's a well-known FE).
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Keith50, Mar 21, 2021, 5:25 AM
Easy, but nice.
Let denote the given assertion. is obviously a solution. Henceforth, assume that . Now since , we conclude that . So . Observe that and On comparing and we have that . Now note that for all Upon simplification, the above result is equivalent to . Also . Hence we have two solutions, i.e. Hence, we are done. Note
In the above solution, certain exceptions occur at certain places, where some statements are not valid at . But those things get fixed because we have separately calculated the values of at .
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by Wizard0001, Apr 25, 2021, 5:04 PM
Note that is a working function,so assume that there exist some other satisfying function.
So if substitute to get and if substitute to get ,so the two equations/statements are equivalent.
Now note that if there exists such that ,substitute to eliminate this case.
Now we substitute say assertion. ,substituiting this i the original relation gives, Now
Again, is an odd function.
Using the above fact (I think this turned redundant in my solution).
Finally to get rid of the annoying in the expression we try to use the equation from our armory.
Plug in to get We substitute in to get
So the working functions are and and its easy to check these work.The End
Hello, the equation in hand is f (x) f (y f(x) - 1) = x ^ 2 f (y) - f (x)
Assume there is some other function since f (x) =0
x = y = 0 => f (0) f (-1) = -f (0) => f(0) = 0 /f(-1) = -1
Taking f (0) = 0 and substitute y = 0
=> f (-1) = -1
Taking f (-1) = -1 and substitute y = 0
=> f (0) = 0
This proves that both statements provided before are equivalent
Considering that there exists an a which is not equal to 0 such that f (a) = 0,
Substituting x = a and y = -1. This will eliminate the case.
Substituting P (x, y)
P (-1, y) => -f (-y -1) = f(y) + 1 => f (y-1) = -f (-y) -1
Now substitute this in the original equation available to get
F (x) f (f (x)) = x^2
P(1, 1)
f(1) f (f(1) -1) = 0
f(1) = 1
Then, P (1,y) = f; This is an odd function
Use f (x +1) = f(x) +1 to get rid of the 1
Put x = x + 1, y = 1 to get
F (f(x)) = 2 x - f (x)
Now substitute f (x) f (f(x)) = x ^2 with f (f (x)) = 2x - f (x)
(f(x) - x) ^ 2 = 0
f(x) = x
We will prove that and are the only solutions.
Let be the assertion in .
It can be easily seen that the only constant function that works is , which is our first solution.
Let be non-constant.
Claim 1 : .
Proof :
Assume possible .
Then, .
As , as we vary over , also varies over .
Hence, .But doesn't satisfy given equation.
Contradiction!
Hence proved claim 1!
Claim 2 : injective.
Proof :
Let .
Let be such that . .
Hence, .
Assume that () is possible. .
If , we get . Contradiction.
If , we get . Contradiction!
Hence, if , is not possible.
Combining with , we get .
Hence proved claim 2!
Hence note that , .Claim 3 : .
Proof : .
(Here we used claim 1 and claim 2)
Hence Proved claim 3!
Claim 4 : .
Proof : . (Here we used claim 1 and claim 2)
Hence proved claim 4!
Claim 5 : The given equation reduces to .
Proof : . (Here we used claim 3) .
Substituting this in given equation, we get .
Hence proved claim 4!
Let be the assertion in .Claim 6 : and .
Proof : .
. .
Hence, (From last two equations).
Hence proved claim 6!
From claim 6, its well-known that is the solution. indeed works and is our second solution!
Hence, we are done
The answer is and only, which both work. Hence suppose . Let denote the assertion.
From we have . If , then for some nonzero constant . But this clearly doesn't work, so and thus . Then from we obtain .
If for some , by picking such that we find that . Then for , gives , hence the range of contains . Since , the range of also contains , so is surjective. Additionally, implies , hence .
Using , from we obtain . Thus we can rewrite the assertion as . From surjectivity, this becomes . Comparing with and using implies that is multiplicative. On the other hand, by plugging in we also get .
Since is multiplicative, we have for all , hence sends positive reals to positive reals. Thus let sending real numbers to real numbers, so is additive (by only considering the multiplicativity of over ). On the other hand, implies that for , hence for . Therefore is linear, so for some . Then we have , hence and as desired.
Answers are and . Suppose that is non-constant. Let be the assertion.
Claim: . Proof: gives thus, we get the result.
Claim: . Proof: yields and implies .Claim: is injective and odd. Proof: If where , then comparing and gives hence . and imply . Since yields , gets each negative real value hence which is equavilent to be even. However, this requires and since , we must have which is impossible. Also hence .Claim: is multiplicative. Proof: Note that we have . By we get or . Since gives , notice that and since is odd, is also multiplicative.
The Finish: or or . Thus, . If , then but is impossible unless which is meaningless. Hence as desired.