Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.

Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.

Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

AIME Problem Series A
Thursday, May 22 - Jul 31

AIME Problem Series B
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
May 1, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
2-var inequality
sqing   4
N 13 minutes ago by mathuz
Source: Own
Let $ a,b\geq 0    $. Prove that
$$ \frac{a }{a^2+2b^2+1}+ \frac{b }{b^2+2a^2+1}\leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} $$$$   \frac{a }{2a^2+ b^2+2ab+1}+ \frac{b }{2b^2+ a^2+2ab+1}  \leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}} $$$$ \frac{a }{2a^2+ b^2+ ab+1}+ \frac{b }{2b^2+ a^2+ ab+1} \leq \frac{1}{2} $$$$\frac{a }{a^2+2b^2+2ab+1}+ \frac{b }{b^2+2a^2+2ab+1}\leq \frac{1}{2} $$
4 replies
1 viewing
sqing
3 hours ago
mathuz
13 minutes ago
How many numbers
brokendiamond   0
27 minutes ago
How many 5-digit numbers can be formed using the digits 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 such that the smaller digits are not positioned between two larger digits?
0 replies
brokendiamond
27 minutes ago
0 replies
Sum of squares in 1865
Twoisaprime   2
N 33 minutes ago by EmptyMachine
Source: 2024 CWMO P1
For positive integer $n$, note $S_n=1^{2024}+2^{2024}+ \cdots +n^{2024}$.
Prove that there exists infinitely many positive integers $n$, such that $S_n$ isn’t divisible by $1865$ but $S_{n+1}$ is divisible by $1865$
2 replies
Twoisaprime
Aug 6, 2024
EmptyMachine
33 minutes ago
USA 97 [1/(b^3+c^3+abc) + ... >= 1/(abc)]
Maverick   47
N 33 minutes ago by justaguy_69
Source: USAMO 1997/5; also: ineq E2.37 in Book: Inegalitati; Authors:L.Panaitopol,V. Bandila,M.Lascu
Prove that, for all positive real numbers $ a$, $ b$, $ c$, the inequality
\[ \frac {1}{a^3 + b^3 + abc} + \frac {1}{b^3 + c^3 + abc} + \frac {1}{c^3 + a^3 + abc} \leq \frac {1}{abc}
\]
holds.
47 replies
Maverick
Sep 12, 2003
justaguy_69
33 minutes ago
Inspired by old results
sqing   1
N an hour ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $ a,b>0 $ and $ \frac{a}{b^2}+\frac{2\sqrt{3}}{2a^2+b^2}\leq 3\sqrt 3. $ Prove that$$a^2+2b^2\geq 1$$
1 reply
sqing
an hour ago
sqing
an hour ago
Orthocenter
jayme   7
N an hour ago by Ianis
Dear Mathlinkers,

1. ABC an acuatangle triangle
2. H the orthcenter of ABC
3. DEF the orthic triangle of ABC
4. A* the midpoint of AH
5. X the point of intersection of AH and EF.

Prove : X is the orthocenter of A*BC.

Sincerely
Jean-Louis
7 replies
jayme
Mar 25, 2015
Ianis
an hour ago
something...
SunnyEvan   1
N an hour ago by SunnyEvan
Source: unknown
Try to prove : $$ \sum csc^{20} \frac{2^{i} \pi}{7} csc^{23} \frac{2^{j}\pi }{7} csc^{2023} \frac{2^{k} \pi}{7} $$is a rational number.
Where $ (i,j,k)=(1,2,3) $ and other permutations.
1 reply
SunnyEvan
3 hours ago
SunnyEvan
an hour ago
HK bisect QS
lssl   24
N 2 hours ago by LeYohan
Source: 1998 HK
In a concyclic quadrilateral $PQRS$,$\angle PSR=\frac{\pi}{2}$ , $H,K$ are perpendicular foot from $Q$ to sides $PR,RS$ , prove that $HK$ bisect segment$SQ$.
24 replies
lssl
Jan 5, 2012
LeYohan
2 hours ago
Points in general position
AshAuktober   3
N 2 hours ago by blackbluecar
Source: 2025 Nepal ptst p1 of 4
Shining tells Prajit a positive integer $n \ge 2025$. Prajit then tries to place n points such that no four points are concyclic and no $3$ points are collinear in Euclidean plane, such that Shining cannot find a group of three points such that their circumcircle contains none of the other remaining points. Is he always able to do so?

(Prajit Adhikari, Nepal and Shining Sun, USA)
3 replies
AshAuktober
Mar 15, 2025
blackbluecar
2 hours ago
Interesting inequalities
sqing   2
N 2 hours ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $ a,b,c>0 $ and $ a+b\leq 16abc. $ Prove that
$$ a+b+kc\geq\sqrt{k}$$$$ a+b+kc^2\geq\frac{3\sqrt[3]{k}}{4}$$Where $ k>0. $
$$ a+b+c\geq1$$$$ a+b+4c\geq2$$$$ a+b+c^2\geq\frac{3}{4}$$$$ a+b+8c^2\geq\frac{3}{2}$$
2 replies
sqing
Yesterday at 12:23 PM
sqing
2 hours ago
IMO 2014 Problem 1
Amir Hossein   132
N 3 hours ago by maromex
Let $a_0 < a_1 < a_2 < \dots$ be an infinite sequence of positive integers. Prove that there exists a unique integer $n\geq 1$ such that
\[a_n < \frac{a_0+a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_n}{n} \leq a_{n+1}.\]
Proposed by Gerhard Wöginger, Austria.
132 replies
Amir Hossein
Jul 8, 2014
maromex
3 hours ago
IMO Genre Predictions
ohiorizzler1434   31
N 3 hours ago by ohiorizzler1434
Everybody, with IMO upcoming, what are you predictions for the problem genres?


Personally I predict: predict
31 replies
ohiorizzler1434
Saturday at 6:51 AM
ohiorizzler1434
3 hours ago
weird FE
tobiSALT   10
N 3 hours ago by NicoN9
Source: Pan American Girls' Mathematical Olympiad 2024, P5
Find all functions $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ such that
$f(f(x+y) - f(x)) + f(x)f(y) = f(x^2) - f(x+y),$

for all real numbers $x, y$.
10 replies
tobiSALT
Nov 27, 2024
NicoN9
3 hours ago
2015 solutions for quotient function!
raxu   49
N 3 hours ago by blueprimes
Source: TSTST 2015 Problem 5
Let $\varphi(n)$ denote the number of positive integers less than $n$ that are relatively prime to $n$. Prove that there exists a positive integer $m$ for which the equation $\varphi(n)=m$ has at least $2015$ solutions in $n$.

Proposed by Iurie Boreico
49 replies
raxu
Jun 26, 2015
blueprimes
3 hours ago
Sequence with condition on million consecutive terms
jbaca   13
N Apr 26, 2025 by Ilikeminecraft
Source: 2021 Iberoamerican Mathematical Olympiad, P3
Let $a_1,a_2,a_3, \ldots$ be a sequence of positive integers and let $b_1,b_2,b_3,\ldots$ be the sequence of real numbers given by
$$b_n = \dfrac{a_1a_2\cdots a_n}{a_1+a_2+\cdots + a_n},\ \mbox{for}\ n\geq 1$$Show that, if there exists at least one term among every million consecutive terms of the sequence $b_1,b_2,b_3,\ldots$ that is an integer, then there exists some $k$ such that $b_k > 2021^{2021}$.
13 replies
jbaca
Oct 20, 2021
Ilikeminecraft
Apr 26, 2025
Sequence with condition on million consecutive terms
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: 2021 Iberoamerican Mathematical Olympiad, P3
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
jbaca
225 posts
#1
Y by
Let $a_1,a_2,a_3, \ldots$ be a sequence of positive integers and let $b_1,b_2,b_3,\ldots$ be the sequence of real numbers given by
$$b_n = \dfrac{a_1a_2\cdots a_n}{a_1+a_2+\cdots + a_n},\ \mbox{for}\ n\geq 1$$Show that, if there exists at least one term among every million consecutive terms of the sequence $b_1,b_2,b_3,\ldots$ that is an integer, then there exists some $k$ such that $b_k > 2021^{2021}$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
blackbluecar
303 posts
#2 • 1 Y
Y by PRMOisTheHardestExam
Notice that if $b_i$ and $b_j$ are consecutive integer terms then $i-j$ is bounded. This implies that there exists some integer $k$ where if $b_i=k=b_j$ and $b_i$ and $b_j$ are consecutive terms with this property, then $i-j$ is bounded. Now, notice that the only thing that decreases the denominator is $a_i=1$ and it does so linearly. And, if $a_i>1$ then the numerator increases exponentially while the denominator grows linearly. Thus, we require an arbitrarily large number of $a_i=1$'s to drag $b_i$ down to $k$, contradicting $i-j$ bounded.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by blackbluecar, Dec 19, 2021, 4:54 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
L567
1184 posts
#3 • 1 Y
Y by PRMOisTheHardestExam
Suppose not, and let the $b_i$ be bounded above by $M$. Ignore the first $10000000M$ terms and only consider the rest, so the denominator of the $b_i$'s now only has numbers $> 10000000M$.

Let $N$ be a sufficiently large number and consider the first $N$ terms. Every million terms, there is at least one integer, so there are at least $\frac{N}{10^6}$ integers. Since there are only $M$ possibilities for these, some integer appears at least $\frac{N}{10^6M}$ times, so by PHP, we can find two of these that are at most $10^6M$ apart.

Say for the first number, we had the $b_i$ equal to $\frac{x}{y}$. The numbers in between cant be all $1$'s since then the integers cannot be equal. Let $P$ be the product of the numbers in between and $S$ be the sum.

We have $\frac{xP}{y+S} = \frac{x}{y} \implies yP = y+S$. Note that we cant have $P = 1$ because then LHS is too small, so $P \ge 2$. I claim the LHS is now too big. Note that if an $a_i$ in between is $> 1$, then replacing it with $a_i - 1$ only decreases the difference between RHS and LHS.

So, the worst case is when one number is $2$ and others are $1$, but then we want to show $2y > y+S \iff y > S$, which is true since $y$ was at least $10000000M$ and $S$ is at most $1000000M$ since there are those many numbers, so it is indeed impossible for the $b_i$ to be bounded, as claimed. $\blacksquare$

Remark

oops @below, I meant "un"bounded
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by L567, Oct 21, 2021, 4:40 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
juckter
323 posts
#4 • 3 Y
Y by PRMOisTheHardestExam, guptaamitu1, MatBoy-123
L567's remark wrote:
We can also prove $a_i$ is bounded but this is useless for the problem.

Wrong. Assume FTSOC that $b_i$ is bounded above.

Claim. $a$ is bounded.

Proof. Assume otherwise and choose a large $k$ such that $a_k > \max(a_1, a_2, \dots, a_{k - 1})$. Let $r \ge k - 10^6$ be such that $b_r$ is an integer and let $k = r + t$. Let $P_r = a_1\dots a_r$ and $S_r = a_1 + \dots + a_r$, so $P_r \ge S_r$. Then

\begin{align*}
b_k = \frac{a_1 \dots a_k}{a_1 + a_2 + \dots + a_k} > \frac{P_ra_k}{S_r + ta_k} \ge \frac{S_ra_k}{S_r + ta_k} \ge \frac{S_ra_k}{2\max(S_r, ta_k)} = \min \left(\frac{a_k}{2}, \frac{S_r}{2t}\right)
\end{align*}
Since $S_r \ge k - 10^6$ and both $k$ and $a_k$ can be arbitrarily large, this provides a contradiction. $\square$

Assume now that $a$ is bounded above by $M$. Let $c_1, c_2, \dots$ be the sequence of integers in the sequence $b_1, b_2, \dots$. Notice that the numerators of the $c_i$ are $M$-smooth, i.e. all of their prime factors are at most $M$. Since the $c_i$ are integers it follows that all the denominators must be $M$-smooth too.

On the other hand, by the problem condition the sequence of denominators is strictly increasing, and any two consecutive denominators differ by at most $10^6 M$. This means the sequence of denominators has a positive lower density, which is a contradiction as the $M$-smooth numbers have density $0$.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by juckter, Oct 21, 2021, 4:04 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6877 posts
#5 • 4 Y
Y by PRMOisTheHardestExam, HamstPan38825, Mathematicsislovely, pog
Let $K = 10^{10^{100}}$ be a huge absolute constant. We consider two cases. The first case is captured in the following claim.

Claim: Suppose that after the first $K$ terms, at least one of every $K$ terms $a_i$ is greater than $1$. Then $b_i$ is unbounded.
Proof. In that case, consider the first $n$ terms for some large $n$. Let $M = \max(a_1, \dots, a_n)$. We have that \[ b_n \ge \frac{ 		2^{\left\lfloor 10^{-6} n - 1 \right\rfloor} M} 	{M+M+\dots+M} 	\ge \frac{1}{n} 		2^{\left\lfloor 10^{-6} n - 1 \right\rfloor} \]since the product of every million terms is at least $2$ and one of the products is actually equal to $M$. The right-hand side is unbounded in $n$, as desired. $\blacksquare$

Thus, we may focus on the case where $a_N = a_{N+1} = \dots = a_{N+K-1} = 1$ for some $N \ge K$. Look at two indices $b_{N+i}$ and $b_{N+j}$ with $|j-i| \le 10^6$ and such that $b_i$ and $b_j$ are integers, as promised by the problem condition. We may write \[ b_i = \frac{X}{Y+i}, \qquad b_j = \frac{X}{Y+j} \]where $Y = a_1 + \dots + a_N \ge N \ge K$. Then \[ X \ge \operatorname{lcm} (Y+i, Y+j) 	= \frac{(Y+i)(Y+j)}{\gcd(Y+i, Y+j)} 	\ge \frac{1}{10^6} (Y+i)(Y+j) \]which means that \[ b_j \ge \frac{Y+j}{10^6} > \frac{K}{10^6} \]as needed.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
SnowPanda
186 posts
#6
Y by
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
guptaamitu1
656 posts
#7
Y by
Assume contrary. Let $\text{one million} = x$ and $2021^{2021} = y$. Note
$$ \frac{a_{n+k}}{a_n} = a_{n+1} \cdots a_{n+k} \cdot \frac{a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_n}{a_1 + \cdots + a_{n+k}} $$Observe decreasing any of $a_1,\ldots,a_{k+n}$ would decrease the above value and increasing them would increase it (this fact will be used several times). By assumption the sequence $\{b_i\}_{i \ge 1}$ is bounded above by $y$. Fix a large $M$. Pick a $N > M$ such that $b_N$ is the max possible integer among $b_M,b_{M+1},\ldots$. We have two cases:

Case 1: All of $a_{N+1},\ldots,a_{N+x}$ equal $1$. Pick a $1 \le r \le x$ such that $a_{N+r} \in \mathbb Z$. Then both
$$ b_N = \frac{a_1a_2 \cdots a_N}{a_1 + \cdots + a_N} ~~,~~ b_{N+r} = \frac{a_1 \cdots a_N}{a_1 + \cdots + a_N + r} $$are integers.
In particular $a_1a_2 \cdots a_N$ is divisible by both $a_1 + \cdots + a_N, a_1 + \cdots + a_N + x$. Thus,
$$ b_N \ge \frac{\text{lcm}(a_1 + \cdots + a_N, a_1 + \cdots + a_N+r)}{a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_N} \ge \frac{a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_N + r}{r} \ge \frac{M}{x}  $$But as $M$ is large, so $b_N > y$, contradiction. $\square$

Case 2: $a_{N+s} > 1$ for some $1 \le s \le x$. Then,
$$ \frac{b_{N+s}}{b_N} = a_{N+1} \cdots a_{N+s} \cdot \frac{a_1 + \cdots + a_N}{a_1 + \cdots + a_{N+s}} \ge 2 \cdot \frac{N}{N+s+1} \ge \frac{2M}{M+s+1} \ge \frac{2M}{M+x+1} $$Now pick a $1 \le t \le x$ such that $b_{N + s + t} \in \mathbb Z$. Then,
$$ \frac{b_{N+s+t}}{b_{N+s}} = a_{N+s+1} \cdots a_{N+s+t} \cdot \frac{a_1 + \cdots + a_{N+s}}{a_1 + \cdots + a_{N+s+t} } \ge \frac{N+s}{N+s+t} \ge \frac{M+s}{M+s+t} \ge \frac{M}{M+t} \ge \frac{M}{M+x} $$Thus it follows that
$$ \frac{b_{N+s+t}}{b_N} \ge \frac{2M}{M+x+1} \cdot \frac{M}{M+x} $$As $M$ is large, so $b_{N+s+t} > b_N$, which contradicts the maximality assumption on $b_N$. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by guptaamitu1, Feb 7, 2022, 6:55 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
megarnie
5604 posts
#8
Y by
Suppose that $b_i\le 2021^{2021}$ for all $i$.

Claim: There exist arbitrarily large groups of consecutive $a_i$ all equal to $1$.
Proof: Suppose this was not the case. Then for any arbitrarily large $k$, we have that at least one of $k$ consecutive terms in the sequence $(a_i)$ is greater than $1$.

Fix a $k=C> 69^{420^{665^{1434}}}$ satisfying that condition. Notice that for any $n$ at least $n$ of $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_{n\cdot C}$ are greater than $1$, which implies that \[b_{n\cdot C} \ge \frac{2^n}{a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_{n\cdot C}}\]Notice that the function $\frac{kx}{k+x}$ for fixed $k$ is increasing over the interval $(1, \infty)$, which implies that \[b_{n\cdot C} \ge \frac{2^n}{n\cdot 2 + (C-n)\cdot 1} = \frac{2^n}{n(C+1)},\]which exceeds $2021^{2021}$ for large $n$. $\square$


Now we have for any $M$, there exist $a_i, a_{i+1}, \ldots, a_{i+M-1}$ all equal to $1$.

Fix a large $M > 665^{1434^{7776}}$ for which $a_i = a_{i+1} = \cdots = a_{i+M-1} = 1$, where $i> 665^{1434^{7776}}$ is a positive integer.

Notice that there exist $x<y$ strictly between $i$ and $i+M - 1$ such that $y-x\le 10^6$ and $b_x, b_y\in \mathbb{Z}$.

Let $x+d = y, a_1a_2 \cdots a_x = P, a_1 + a_2 \cdots + a_x = S$. We have \[b_x = \frac{P}{S}, b_y = \frac{P}{S+d}\]This implies that $\mathrm{lcm}(S, S+d)\mid P$, so \[P\ge \frac{S(S+d)}{\gcd(S, S+d)} \ge \frac{S(S+d)}{10^6},\]which implies that $b_x \ge \frac{S+d}{10^6}$, which exceeds $2021^{2021}$ because $S\ge x$ is a sufficiently large positive integer, contradiction.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
5001 posts
#9 • 1 Y
Y by megarnie
We prove that $b_i$ is unbounded which clearly finishes. Suppose for the sake of contradiction that the $b_i$ are all bounded above by some positive integer $M$.
First note that $S_n:=a_1+\cdots+a_n$ is clearly unbounded, so $P_n:=a_1\ldots a_n$ must be as well, since it's bounded below by $S_n$ at least once in every million consecutive terms. We now prove the central claim.

Claim: There cannot exist one trillion consecutive terms $a_{n+1}=\cdots=a_{n+10^{12}}=1$ for $n$ sufficiently large.
Proof: We will first prove that there cannot exist one billion consecutive terms $a_{n+1}=\cdots=a_{n+10^9}=1$ if $b_n$ is an integer, if $n$ is sufficiently large, so $S_n\geq GM$, where $G$ is Graham's number. Suppose that we have $P_n=kS_n$, so $k\leq M$. Then if $a_{n+1}=\cdots=a_{n+10^9}=1$, we have
$$b_{n+10^9}=\frac{kS_n}{S_n+10^9}>k-1 \iff kS_n>kS_n-S_n+10^9k-10^9 \iff S_n>10^9k-10^9,$$which is true. Thus $b_i \in (k-1,k)$ for all $n+1 \leq i \leq n+10^9$, so we have $10^9$ consecutive noninteger $b_i$: illegal. To finish, note that if $a_{n+1}=\cdots=a_{n+10^{12}}=1$ we can find some $1 \leq i \leq 10^6$ such that $b_i$ is an integer, so applying this lemma implies that there are at most $10^6+10^9$ consecutive one terms at a time, which clearly implies the desired claim.

Now for large $n$ such that $S_n \geq \mathrm{TREE}(3)M$ (note that $\mathrm{TREE}(3)\gg G$), if we have $a_{n+1}=\cdots=a_{n+k}=1$ and $a_{n+k+1}=c>1$, we have
$$b_{n+k+1}=\frac{cP_n}{S_n+c+k}\geq \frac{1.001P_n}{S_n}=1.001b_n \iff cS_n\geq 1.001(S_n+c+k) \iff S_n \geq \frac{1.001c+1.001k}{c-1.001}\geq 1.001+\frac{1.001k+1.001^2}{c-1.001}.$$By our claim, $k\leq M$, hence the last inequality is certainly true as $c\geq 2$. Thus we can find a subsequence of the $b_i$ which grows exponentially, which contradicts our initial assumption. This clearly gives us some $b_k>2021^{2021}$, so we're done. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mathlogician
1051 posts
#10
Y by
The goal is to prove that $(b_i)$ is unbounded; suppose otherwise. Now we first prove that we can never have an infinitely long string of $1$s, since otherwise for infinitely many consecutive $b_i$ we have $b_i < 1$ as $a_1a_2\cdots a_i$ is bounded whilst $a_1+a_2+\cdots + a_i$ is unbounded. Now take a very large $n$ and $k$ such that some term between $a_n$ and $a_{n+k}$ is greater than $1$ and with $b_n \geq b_k$; we can do this since $(b_i)$ is bounded. We get that $S \left( a_{n+1}a_{n+2}\dots a_{n+k} \right) \leq a_{n+1} + a_{n+2} + \dots + a_{n+k}$ where $S = a_1 + a_2 + \dots + a_n$. Suppose that $t$ of the $a_i$ between $a_n$ and $a_{n+k}$ are greater than $1$. Then if $t = 1$ then with sufficiently high $S$ we note that $S(a_i -1) > 10^6-1 + a_i$ which is a contradiction. Otherwise if $t>1$ we can just induct down on $t$ by noticing $a_i > 1$ contributes a lot more to the left-hand side than the right-hand side, done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Bigtaitus
75 posts
#11 • 1 Y
Y by Vahe_Arsenyan
We assume FTSOC that $b_k\leq 2021^{2021}$ $\forall k.$ Now the key claim is the following:

Claim. For all $a\in\mathbb{N}$ $\exists b s.t. a_{b+i}=1 \forall i\in \{1,2,\dots, a\}.$

Proof. For some $a_i$ with $i$ arbitrarely big, let $c_1,c_2,...,c_k$ be the $a_j\geq 2$ for $j\leq i.$ Now: $$b_i=\frac{c_1\cdots c_k}{c_1+\cdots + c_k+(i-k)}.$$If we can show that $(i-k)>ck$ has a solution $k$ $\forall c,$ then the claim is proven by $PHP.$
In order to show this, we claim that $b_i$ would dicrease if we swap some $a_l\to a_l-1f.$ For the sake of simplicity we'll replace $a_1\to a_1-1.$ This is equivalent to: $$\frac{(c_1-1)c_2\cdots c_k}{c_1-1+c_2+\cdots c_k}\leq \frac{c_1\cdots c_k}{c_1+c_2+\cdots c_k}$$which is trivially true by expanding. So, iterating this procces until all $c_i's$ are $2$ we get that $$b_i\leq \frac{2^{k}}{2k+(i-k)}\leq 2021^{2021},$$which ends the claim.
\blacksquare

This means that we can get a $d$ such that there exist $d_1,d_2,...,d_m<10^6$ satisfying that all $b_{d}, b_{d+d_1}, b_{d+d_1+d_2}, \dots, b_{d+d_1+\cdots +d_m}$ are all integers, and $a_d,a_{d+1}, \dots a_{d+d_1+\cdots +d_k}=1.$ Let $f(i)=a_1+a_2+\cdots a_i.$ Now we have that $lcm(f(d),f(d+d_1),\dots f(d+d_1+\cdots +d_m))\mid a_1\cdot a_2\cdots a_d.$ Bounding the quotient of this $lcm$ and $f(d)$ is trivial, and ends the problem immediately.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8859 posts
#12
Y by
Let $\{x_i\}$ be the maximal subsequence of $\{b_i\}$ that consists of only integers. (For convenience, the indices of $\{x_i\}$ will match those of $\{b_i\}$ and thus not be always consecutive.) I claim that for every $x_i$, there exists an $r$ such that $x_{i+r} > x_i$, which will imply the result.

Suppose for the sake of contradiction that there exists an $n$ such that $\{x_i\}$ is constant at $c$ for all $i \geq n$. Then, for $k > \ell > n$, we have
\begin{align*}
a_1a_2\cdots a_k &= c(a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_k) \\
a_1a_2\cdots a_\ell &= c(a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_\ell) \\
\implies a_{\ell+1}a_{\ell+2}\cdots a_k(a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_\ell) &= a_1+a_2+\cdots + a_k.
\end{align*}Let $N = a_1+a_2+\cdots + a_\ell$. Then suppose $a_{\ell+1}+a_{\ell+2}+\cdots + a_k = m \cdot N$, such that $a_{\ell+1}a_{\ell+2}\cdots a_n > m \cdot N - 10^6$ as $k - \ell < 10^6$. It follows that $$Na_{\ell + 1}a_{\ell+2} \cdots a_k > N(m \cdot N - 10^6) > (m+1)N = a_1+a_2+\cdots+ a_k,$$which is an obvious contradiction.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by HamstPan38825, Dec 21, 2023, 11:47 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
bin_sherlo
716 posts
#13
Y by
Suppose that $\{b_i\}_{i=1}^{\infty}$ is bounded above by $C$. Since there are finitely many positive integers $b_i$ can take, there are infinitely many pairs where $b_i=b_j$. Assume that the value $T$ is taken infinitely many times. Let $T=b_{m_1}=\dots=b_{m_r}=\dots$
\[\frac{a_1\dots a_k}{a_1+\dots+a_k}=T=\frac{a_1\dots a_k\dots a_{k+l}}{a_1+\dots+a_{k+l}}\implies a_{k+1}\dots a_{k+l}=1+\frac{a_{k+1}+\dots+a_{k+l}}{a_1+\dots+a_k}\]Note that $a_1+\dots+a_k|a_{k+1}+\dots+a_{k+l}$ hence $k\leq a_{k+1}+\dots+a_{k+l}$. We see that
\[\frac{a_{k+1}+\dots+a_{k+l}}{l}\leq a_{k+1}\dots a_{k+l}=1+\frac{a_{k+1}+\dots+a_{k+l}}{a_1+\dots+a_k}\leq 1+\frac{a_{k+1}+\dots+a_{k+l}}{k}\]We pick $l\leq 10^6$ and $k$ sufficiently large (since there are infinitely many $b_i\in \mathbb{Z}^+$ and consecutive ones have difference at most $10^6$ we can apply this).
\[1\geq (a_{k+1}+\dots+a_{k+l})(\frac{1}{l}-\frac{1}{k})\geq k(\frac{1}{l}-\frac{1}{k})\geq \frac{k}{l}-1>1\]Which gives a contradiction as desired.$\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ilikeminecraft
614 posts
#15
Y by
Suppose $b_n$ is bounded above. Let $A = 143414341434$ be a fixed constant.
Claim: Let $N$ be any integer. Then, there exists a value $k$ such that $a_k = a_{k + 1} = \dots = a_{k + N - 1} = 1.$
Proof: Suppose $c_1, \dots, c_k$ are the values greater than 1 in the set $a_1, a_2, \dots, a_m,$ where $m$ is some very big number. Then, \[b_m = \frac{c_1\dots c_k}{c_1 + \dots + c_k + (m - k)}.\]Observe that $\frac{x\cdot j}{x + j}$ is an increasing function over $x \in (1, \infty)$ for a fixed $j > 0.$ Thus, if we were to smooth the value of $b_m$ by forcing all of the $c_i = 2,$ we get \[b_m \geq  \frac{2^m}{2m + k - m} \geq 2021^{2021}\]for sufficiently large $m.$ Thus, the claim must be true.

We now prove that this is a contradiction. Assume $b_n$ is bounded above by $B.$ We know there exists $k$ such that $a_{k + 1} = a_{k + 2} = \dots = a_{AB + k} = 1.$ Clearly, at least $B + 1$ values in the set $\{b_{k + 1}, b_{k + 2}, \dots, b_{k + AB + k}\}$ must be integers. However, clearly, the values $b_{k + i} > b_{k + j}$ for $i > j.$ Thus, this is impossible.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a