We have your learning goals covered with Spring and Summer courses available. Enroll today!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
a My Retirement & New Leadership at AoPS
rrusczyk   1345
N an hour ago by GoodGamer123
I write today to announce my retirement as CEO from Art of Problem Solving. When I founded AoPS 22 years ago, I never imagined that we would reach so many students and families, or that we would find so many channels through which we discover, inspire, and train the great problem solvers of the next generation. I am very proud of all we have accomplished and I’m thankful for the many supporters who provided inspiration and encouragement along the way. I'm particularly grateful to all of the wonderful members of the AoPS Community!

I’m delighted to introduce our new leaders - Ben Kornell and Andrew Sutherland. Ben has extensive experience in education and edtech prior to joining AoPS as my successor as CEO, including starting like I did as a classroom teacher. He has a deep understanding of the value of our work because he’s an AoPS parent! Meanwhile, Andrew and I have common roots as founders of education companies; he launched Quizlet at age 15! His journey from founder to MIT to technology and product leader as our Chief Product Officer traces a pathway many of our students will follow in the years to come.

Thank you again for your support for Art of Problem Solving and we look forward to working with millions more wonderful problem solvers in the years to come.

And special thanks to all of the amazing AoPS team members who have helped build AoPS. We’ve come a long way from here:IMAGE
1345 replies
rrusczyk
Monday at 6:37 PM
GoodGamer123
an hour ago
k a March Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Mar 2, 2025
March is the month for State MATHCOUNTS competitions! Kudos to everyone who participated in their local chapter competitions and best of luck to all going to State! Join us on March 11th for a Math Jam devoted to our favorite Chapter competition problems! Are you interested in training for MATHCOUNTS? Be sure to check out our AMC 8/MATHCOUNTS Basics and Advanced courses.

Are you ready to level up with Olympiad training? Registration is open with early bird pricing available for our WOOT programs: MathWOOT (Levels 1 and 2), CodeWOOT, PhysicsWOOT, and ChemWOOT. What is WOOT? WOOT stands for Worldwide Online Olympiad Training and is a 7-month high school math Olympiad preparation and testing program that brings together many of the best students from around the world to learn Olympiad problem solving skills. Classes begin in September!

Do you have plans this summer? There are so many options to fit your schedule and goals whether attending a summer camp or taking online classes, it can be a great break from the routine of the school year. Check out our summer courses at AoPS Online, or if you want a math or language arts class that doesn’t have homework, but is an enriching summer experience, our AoPS Virtual Campus summer camps may be just the ticket! We are expanding our locations for our AoPS Academies across the country with 15 locations so far and new campuses opening in Saratoga CA, Johns Creek GA, and the Upper West Side NY. Check out this page for summer camp information.

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]March 5th (Wednesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, HCSSiM Math Jam 2025. Amber Verser, Assistant Director of the Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics, will host an information session about HCSSiM, a summer program for high school students.
[*]March 6th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar on Math Competitions from elementary through high school. Join us for an enlightening session that demystifies the world of math competitions and helps you make informed decisions about your contest journey.
[*]March 11th (Tuesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS Chapter Discussion MATH JAM. AoPS instructors will discuss some of their favorite problems from the MATHCOUNTS Chapter Competition. All are welcome!
[*]March 13th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar about Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus. Transform your summer into an unforgettable learning adventure! From elementary through high school, we offer dynamic summer camps featuring topics in mathematics, language arts, and competition preparation - all designed to fit your schedule and ignite your passion for learning.[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Friday, Mar 28 - Jul 18
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Jul 8
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21


Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jul 20
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 16 - Jun 8
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Monday, Mar 17 - Jun 9
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Tuesday, Mar 4 - Aug 12
Sunday, Mar 23 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Mar 16 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 23 - Aug 3
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Sunday, Mar 16 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Wednesday, Mar 5 - May 21
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Sunday, Mar 30 - Oct 5
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jun 15
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Tuesday, Mar 4 - May 20
Monday, Mar 31 - Jun 23
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Monday, Mar 24 - Jun 16
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Sunday, Mar 30 - Jun 22
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Mar 2, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
Sequence and prime factors
USJL   0
5 minutes ago
Source: 2025 Taiwan TST Round 2 Independent Study 1-N
Let $a_0,a_1,\ldots$ be a sequence of positive integers with $a_0=1$, $a_1=2$ and
\[a_n = a_{n-1}^{a_{n-1}a_{n-2}}-1\]for all $n\geq 2$. Show that if $p$ is a prime less than $2^k$ for some positive integer $k$, then there exists $n\leq k+1$ such that $p\mid a_n$.
0 replies
USJL
5 minutes ago
0 replies
Jury Meeting Lasting for Twenty Years
USJL   0
7 minutes ago
Source: 2025 Taiwan TST Round 2 Independent Study 1-C
2025 IMO leaders are discussing $100$ problems in a meeting. For each $i = 1, 2,\ldots , 100$, each leader will talk about the $i$-th problem for $i$-th minutes. The chair can assign one leader to talk about a problem of his choice, but he would have to wait for the leader to complete the entire talk of that problem before assigning the next leader and problem. The next leader can be the same leader. The next problem can be a different problem. Each leader’s longest idle time is the longest consecutive time that he is not talking.
Find the minimum positive integer $T$ so that the chair can ensure that the longest idle time for any leader does not exceed $T$.

Proposed by usjl
0 replies
+2 w
USJL
7 minutes ago
0 replies
Find the value
sqing   1
N 14 minutes ago by lbh_qys
Source: Hunan changsha 2025
Let $ a,b,c $ be real numbers such that $  abc\neq 0,2a-b+c= 0 $ and $ a-2b-c=0. $ Find the value of $\frac{a^2+b^2+c^2}{ab+bc+ca}.$
Let $ a,b,c $ be real numbers such that $  abc\neq 0,a+2b+3c= 0 $ and $ 2a+3b+4c=0. $ Find the value of $\frac{ab+bc+ca}{a^2+b^2+c^2}.$
1 reply
sqing
an hour ago
lbh_qys
14 minutes ago
D1010 : How it is possible ?
Dattier   13
N 17 minutes ago by Dattier
Source: les dattes à Dattier
Is it true that$$\forall n \in \mathbb N^*, (24^n \times B \mod A) \mod 2 = 0 $$?

A=1728400904217815186787639216753921417860004366580219212750904
024377969478249664644267971025952530803647043121025959018172048
336953969062151534282052863307398281681465366665810775710867856
720572225880311472925624694183944650261079955759251769111321319
421445397848518597584590900951222557860592579005088853698315463
815905425095325508106272375728975

B=2275643401548081847207782760491442295266487354750527085289354
965376765188468052271190172787064418854789322484305145310707614
546573398182642923893780527037224143380886260467760991228567577
953725945090125797351518670892779468968705801340068681556238850
340398780828104506916965606659768601942798676554332768254089685
307970609932846902
13 replies
Dattier
Mar 10, 2025
Dattier
17 minutes ago
integral points
jhz   1
N 20 minutes ago by gaussiemann144
Source: 2025 CTST P17
Prove: there exist integer $x_1,x_2,\cdots x_{10},y_1,y_2,\cdots y_{10}$ satisfying the following conditions:
$(1)$ $|x_i|,|y_i|\le 10^{10} $ for all $1\le i \le 10$
$(2)$ Define the set \[S = \left\{ \left( \sum_{i=1}^{10} a_i x_i, \sum_{i=1}^{10} a_i y_i \right) : a_1, a_2, \cdots, a_{10} \in \{0, 1\} \right\},\]then \(|S| = 1024\)and any rectangular strip of width 1 covers at most two points of S.
1 reply
jhz
5 hours ago
gaussiemann144
20 minutes ago
Probability-hard
Noname23   2
N 21 minutes ago by Noname23
problem
2 replies
Noname23
an hour ago
Noname23
21 minutes ago
7 triangles in a square
gghx   2
N an hour ago by lightsynth123
Source: SMO junior 2024 Q3
Seven triangles of area $7$ lie in a square of area $27$. Prove that among the $7$ triangles there are $2$ that intersect in a region of area not less than $1$.
2 replies
gghx
Oct 12, 2024
lightsynth123
an hour ago
n-variable inequality
ABCDE   65
N 2 hours ago by LMat
Source: 2015 IMO Shortlist A1, Original 2015 IMO #5
Suppose that a sequence $a_1,a_2,\ldots$ of positive real numbers satisfies \[a_{k+1}\geq\frac{ka_k}{a_k^2+(k-1)}\]for every positive integer $k$. Prove that $a_1+a_2+\ldots+a_n\geq n$ for every $n\geq2$.
65 replies
ABCDE
Jul 7, 2016
LMat
2 hours ago
2 degree polynomial
PrimeSol   3
N 2 hours ago by PrimeSol
Let $P_{1}(x)= x^2 +b_{1}x +c_{1}, ... , P_{n}(x)=x^2+ b_{n}x+c_{n}$, $P_{i}(x)\in \mathbb{R}[x], \forall i=\overline{1,n}.$ $\forall i,j ,1 \leq i<j \leq n : P_{i}(x) \ne P_{j}(x)$.
$\forall i,j, 1\leq i<j \leq n : Q_{i,j}(x)= P_{i}(x) + P_{j}(x)$ polynomial with only one root.
$max(n)=?$
3 replies
PrimeSol
Mar 24, 2025
PrimeSol
2 hours ago
Additive Combinatorics!
EthanWYX2009   3
N 2 hours ago by flower417477
Source: 2025 TST 15
Let \( X \) be a finite set of real numbers, \( d \) be a real number, and \(\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \cdots, \lambda_{2025}\) be 2025 non-zero real numbers. Define
\[A = 
\left\{ 
(x_1, x_2, \cdots, x_{2025}) : x_1, x_2, \cdots, x_{2025} \in X \text{ and } \sum_{i=1}^{2025} \lambda_i x_i = d 
\right\},\]\[B = 
\left\{ 
(x_1, x_2, \cdots, x_{2024}) : x_1, x_2, \cdots, x_{2024} \in X \text{ and } \sum_{i=1}^{2024} (-1)^i x_i = 0 
\right\},\]\[C = 
\left\{ 
(x_1, x_2, \cdots, x_{2026}) : x_1, x_2, \cdots, x_{2026} \in X \text{ and } \sum_{i=1}^{2026} (-1)^i x_i = 0 
\right\}.\]Show that \( |A|^2 \leq |B| \cdot |C| \).
3 replies
EthanWYX2009
Yesterday at 12:49 AM
flower417477
2 hours ago
Inspired by IMO 1984
sqing   0
3 hours ago
Source: Own
Let $ a,b,c\geq 0 $ and $a^2+b^2+ ab +24abc\geq\frac{81}{64}$. Prove that
$$a+b+\frac{9}{5}c\geq\frac{9}{8}$$$$a+b+\frac{3}{2}c\geq \frac{9}{8}\sqrt [3]{\frac{3}{2}}-\frac{3}{16}$$$$a+b+\frac{8}{5}c\geq  \frac{9\sqrt [3]{25}-4}{20}$$Let $ a,b,c\geq 0 $ and $ a^2+b^2+ ab +18abc\geq\frac{343}{324} $. Prove that
$$a+b+\frac{6}{5}c\geq\frac{7\sqrt 7}{18}$$$$a+b+\frac{27}{25}c\geq\frac{35\sqrt [3]5-9}{50}$$
0 replies
1 viewing
sqing
3 hours ago
0 replies
equal angles
jhz   2
N 3 hours ago by YaoAOPS
Source: 2025 CTST P16
In convex quadrilateral $ABCD, AB \perp AD, AD = DC$. Let $ E$ be a point on side $BC$, and $F$ be a point on the extension of $DE$ such that $\angle ABF = \angle DEC>90^{\circ}$. Let $O$ be the circumcenter of $\triangle CDE$, and $P$ be a point on the side extension of $FO$ satisfying $FB =FP$. Line BP intersects AC at point Q. Prove that $\angle AQB =\angle DPF.$
2 replies
jhz
6 hours ago
YaoAOPS
3 hours ago
Flee Jumping on Number Line
utkarshgupta   23
N 3 hours ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: All Russian Olympiad 2015 11.5
An immortal flea jumps on whole points of the number line, beginning with $0$. The length of the first jump is $3$, the second $5$, the third $9$, and so on. The length of $k^{\text{th}}$ jump is equal to $2^k + 1$. The flea decides whether to jump left or right on its own. Is it possible that sooner or later the flee will have been on every natural point, perhaps having visited some of the points more than once?
23 replies
utkarshgupta
Dec 11, 2015
Ilikeminecraft
3 hours ago
Smallest value of |253^m - 40^n|
MS_Kekas   3
N 3 hours ago by imagien_bad
Source: Kyiv City MO 2024 Round 1, Problem 9.5
Find the smallest value of the expression $|253^m - 40^n|$ over all pairs of positive integers $(m, n)$.

Proposed by Oleksii Masalitin
3 replies
MS_Kekas
Jan 28, 2024
imagien_bad
3 hours ago
The three lines AA', BB' and CC' meet on the line IO
WakeUp   43
N Mar 23, 2025 by cursed_tangent1434
Source: Romanian Master Of Mathematics 2012
Let $ABC$ be a triangle and let $I$ and $O$ denote its incentre and circumcentre respectively. Let $\omega_A$ be the circle through $B$ and $C$ which is tangent to the incircle of the triangle $ABC$; the circles $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ are defined similarly. The circles $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ meet at a point $A'$ distinct from $A$; the points $B'$ and $C'$ are defined similarly. Prove that the lines $AA',BB'$ and $CC'$ are concurrent at a point on the line $IO$.

(Russia) Fedor Ivlev
43 replies
WakeUp
Mar 3, 2012
cursed_tangent1434
Mar 23, 2025
The three lines AA', BB' and CC' meet on the line IO
G H J
Source: Romanian Master Of Mathematics 2012
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
WakeUp
1347 posts
#1 • 13 Y
Y by narutomath96, Viswanath, lephuongnam1568, anantmudgal09, Adventure10, GeoKing, Funcshun840, Rounak_iitr, and 5 other users
Let $ABC$ be a triangle and let $I$ and $O$ denote its incentre and circumcentre respectively. Let $\omega_A$ be the circle through $B$ and $C$ which is tangent to the incircle of the triangle $ABC$; the circles $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ are defined similarly. The circles $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ meet at a point $A'$ distinct from $A$; the points $B'$ and $C'$ are defined similarly. Prove that the lines $AA',BB'$ and $CC'$ are concurrent at a point on the line $IO$.

(Russia) Fedor Ivlev
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
enescu
741 posts
#2 • 4 Y
Y by Viswanath, Adventure10, Mango247, and 1 other user
http://rmm.lbi.ro/index.php?id=solutions_math
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mahanmath
1354 posts
#3 • 13 Y
Y by yumeidesu, Lyub4o, yugrey, mathuz, eziz, narutomath96, Dukejukem, esi, Viswanath, Ankoganit, magicarrow, centslordm, Adventure10
Congrats F.Ivlev ! Very very cute problem :)
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
r1234
462 posts
#4 • 6 Y
Y by eziz, Fermat_Theorem, guptaamitu1, Adventure10, and 2 other users
Lemma:- Let $\ell$ be a line and $\Gamma$ be circle.Suppose $P$ is the pole of $\ell$ wrt $\Gamma$.Now let $\triangle ABC$ be inscribed in $\Gamma$.Let $\triangle A'B'C'$ be the circumcevian triangle of $\triangle ABC$ wrt $P$.Then $\ell$ is the perspective axis of $\triangle ABC$ and $\triangle A'B'C'$.

Proof:-

Let $A_1=BC\cap B'C', B_1=AC\cap A'C', C_1=AB\cap A'B'$.
Now applying Pascal's theorem on the hexagon $B'C'ABCA'$ we get $A_1,C_1, C'A\cap CA'$ are collinear.
Again $\triangle AC'B$ and $\triangle A'CB'$ are perspective.So $C_1, C'A\cap CA', BC'\cap B'C$ are collinear.Hence we conclude that $A_1,C_1, BC'\cap B'C$ are collinear.But this line is nothing but the polar of $P$ i.e $\ell$.Hence we conclude that $A_1B_1C_1\equiv \ell$.

Back to the main proof

Clearly $AA'$ is the radical axis of $\omega _b, \omega_c$, $BB'$ is the radical axis of $\omega_c, \omega_a$ and $CC'$ is the radical axis of $\omega_a, \omega_b$.So by radical axis theorem $AA', BB', CC'$ are concurrent.
Let $(I)$ be the incircle of $\triangle ABC$ and $\triangle DEF$ is its intouch triangle.$D', E', F'$ are the touch points of $(I)$ with $\omega_a, \omega_b, \omega_c$ respectively.Now let tangents at $D', E', F'$ meets $BC, CA, AB$ at $X,Y,Z$ respectively.Then its easy to show that $XYZ$ is the radical axis of $(I)$ and $\odot ABC$.So $X$ is the pole of $DD'$ wrt $(I)$ and similar for others.So $DD', EE', FF'$ concur at the pole of $XYZ$ wrt $(I)$.Now consider the circles $(I), \omega_b, \omega_c$.Then by radical axis theorem the lines $AA', E'E', F'F'$ are concurrent ,say at $X_1$.Then $X_1$ is the pole of $E'F'$ wrt $(I)$.Since $A, X_1, A'$ are collinear, their polars i.e $EF,E'F',\text{Polar of A'}$ are concurrent.So $\triangle DEF$ and the triangle formed by the polars of $A', B', C'$ are perspective wrt the perspective axis of $\triangle DEF, \triangle D'E'F'$.But according to our lemma this perspective axis is the polar of the perspective point of $\triangle DEF, \triangle D'E'F'$, i.e the radical axis of $(I), \odot ABC$.So we conclude that $AA', BB', CC'$ concur at the pole of the radical axis of $(I), \odot ABC$ wrt $(I)$.Since $IO\perp \text{Radical axis of (I),circumcircle of ABC}$ we conclude that the pole of the radical axis of $(I), \odot ABC$ lies on $IO$.Hence $AA', BB', CC'$ concur on $IO$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Swistak
180 posts
#5 • 5 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, and 3 other users
Daaaamn! That problem was so incredibly similar to my solution of this problem: http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=2280575&sid=06651024ba8c2a2d88a8d3bf555bf086#p2280575 (I don't know why, but it's written that this is from 2010 MO, but it's from 2011 MO). During the polish final I solved that using radical axis of incenter and vertices and homothety. But during Romanian I didn't see that sixth problem is so similar :/. If I only drew one line :<... 75% of first official solution is like copy+paste from my solution from polish final :/.

Of course very nice and hard problem :).
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
simplependulum
73 posts
#6 • 3 Y
Y by eziz, magicarrow, Adventure10
Here is my solution :

By radical axis theorem , we can immediately conclude that the three lines intersect at the radical centre $ R $ of the three circles . To show that this radical centre is on $ IO $ , consider the inversion w.r.t to a circle centered at $ R $ and with radius $ \sqrt{ - \text{ power at R to the circles } } $ and then the reflection w.r.t $ R $ . ( It is actually the same as the case that the three circles are disjoint so that we can choose an inversion at $ R $ sending these circles to themselves . ) We find that the images of $ \omega_A ~,~ \omega_B ~,~ \omega_C $ are themselves and the incircle becomes the larger circle tangent to them ( internally ) . From the property of this transformation ( inversion + homothety ) , $ R ~,~ I $ and the centre of this circle are collinear . We now show that this centre is actually $ O $ !

Let $ A_1 $ be the mid-pt of arc $BC$ of $ \omega_A $ that does not intersect the incircle . $ B_1 ~,~ C_1 $ are defined in similar mannar . It is well-known that the power at $A_1$ to the incircle is equal to $ A_1B^2 $ and $ A_1C^2 $ , so $ A_1 $ is the radical centre of the incircle , 'circle' $ B$ and 'circle' $C$ . ( $ B_1 ~,~ C_1 $ have similar property ). Therefore , we conclude that $ A_1 ~,~ B_1 $ lie on the radical axis of the incircle and 'circle' $C$ , and for other pairs , we have similar conclusion . Let $ D ~,~ E ~,~ F $ be the mid-pts of arc $ BC ~,~ CA ~,~ AB $ ( not containing the third vertex of $ \Delta ABC $ . ) of $(ABC)$ respectively . Then , we deduce that $ \Delta A_1B_1C_1 $ is homothetic to $ \Delta DEF $ and the centre of homothety is the intersection of the perpendicular bisectors of $ AB ~,~ BC ~,~ CA $ , which is $ O $ . Since $ O $ is the circumcenter of $ \Delta DEF  $ , so is $ \Delta A_1B_1C_1 $ . But $ A_1 $ is an intersection of $ \omega_A $ and $ (A_1B_1C_1) $ and the centres of these two circles lie on the perpendicular bisector of $ BC $ which passes through $ A_1 $ , we therefore deduce that $ (A_1B_1C_1) $ is tangent to $ \omega_A $ . Similarly , $ (A_1B_1C_1) $ is tangent to $ \omega_B ~,~ \omega_C $ . In other words , $ (A_1B_1C_1) $ is the larger circle we previously described , which has the centre $ O $ !
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pohoatza
1145 posts
#7 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Bonus points for the one who generalizes this as much as possible. :D
Hint
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
buratinogigle
2317 posts
#8 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, ehuseyinyigit
General problem

Let $ABC$ be a triangle and a point $P$. $A_1B_1C_1$ is pedal triangle of $P$. $A_2B_2C_2$ is antipedal triangle of $P$. $A_1A_2,B_1B_2,C_1C_2$ cut pedal circle $(A_1B_1C_1)$ again at $A_3,B_3,C_3$. Let circumcircle $(ABC_3),(CAB_3)$ intersect again at $A_4$. Similarly, we have $B_4,C_4$. Prove that $AA_4,BB_4,CC_4$ are concurrent.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
simplependulum
73 posts
#9 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10 and 1 other user
buratinogigle wrote:
General problem

Let $ABC$ be a triangle and a point $P$. $A_1B_1C_1$ is pedal triangle of $P$. $A_2B_2C_2$ is antipedal triangle of $P$. $A_1A_2,B_1B_2,C_1C_2$ cut pedal circle $(A_1B_1C_1)$ again at $A_3,B_3,C_3$. Let circumcircle $(ABC_3),(CAB_3)$ intersect again at $A_4$. Similarly, we have $B_4,C_4$. Prove that $AA_4,BB_4,CC_4$ are concurrent.

only concurrent ? but can't it be immediately proved by radical axis theorem ?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
buratinogigle
2317 posts
#10 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Sorry, you are right, it is trivial :), I will try again!
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Fedyarer
8 posts
#11 • 12 Y
Y by mahanmath, NewAlbionAcademy, hyperspace.rulz, mathuz, bobthesmartypants, toto1234567890, 62861, Adventure10, Mango247, and 3 other users
Thank you for all who say that like this problem. It's my :)
I was very wonderful that this problem was taken on this Olympiad. I didn't expecte that it's so nice, but.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
yumeidesu
161 posts
#12 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
If we call $P_a, P_b,P_c$ be the intersections of $\omega_A, \omega_B, \omega_C$ with $(I)$, respectively, then $AP_a, BP_b, CP_c$ are concurrent.
I find it by sketchpad but I don't know how to prove it. Who can help me?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mahanmath
1354 posts
#13 • 2 Y
Y by yumeidesu, Adventure10
yumeidesu wrote:
If we call $P_a, P_b,P_c$ be the intersections of $\omega_A, \omega_B, \omega_C$ with $(I)$, respectively, then $AP_a, BP_b, CP_c$ are concurrent.
I find it by sketchpad but I don't know how to prove it. Who can help me?
Keep the notations in my first post in mind , There is a celebrated theorem which asserts that , for three points $A' , B' , C'$ on $(I)$ $AA' , BB' , CC'$ are concurrent if and only if $A' T_a , B' T_b, C' T_c$ . It can easily proved by trigonometric Ceva theorem .
According to what I proved in my post we know $P_a T_a , P_b T_b, P_c T_c$ are concurrent and above theorem implies that $AP_a, BP_b, CP_c$ are concurrent.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
yumeidesu
161 posts
#14 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
I think this problem is a combine problem from:
IMO Shortlist 2002:
http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=118682&sid=ff0420e5b46b2284383a55c03e1bc918#p118682
Vietnam TST 2003:
http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=268390&sid=ff0420e5b46b2284383a55c03e1bc918#p268390
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cwein3
148 posts
#15 • 2 Y
Y by eziz, Adventure10
Let the point of tangency between $\omega_A$ and the incircle be $A''$, and so on, and the excenters be $I_A$, $I_B$, $I_C$. Let the incircle be tangent to $BC$, $AC$, and $AB$ at $T_A$, $T_B$, and $T_C$, respectively.

Lemma 1: $A''T_A$ passes through $I_A$.
Proof: This is 2002 G7.

Lemma 2: $I_AT_A$, $I_BT_B$, $I_CT_C$ are concurrent.
Sketch of proof: Trig Ceva wrt $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$.

Lemma 3: $A''T_A$, $B''T_B$, and $AA'$ are concurrent.
Proof: Let the tangents to the incircle at $A''$ and $B''$ intersect at $N$. By the Radical Axis Theorem, $N$ lies on $AA'$. Let $T_AT_B$ and $A''B''$ intersect at $M$, then it's easy to show that $NA$ is the polar of $M$ wrt to $(I)$. Thus, $A''T_A$ and $B''T_B$ intersect on $NA$.

From Lemmas 2 and 3, we can conclude that $AA'$, $BB'$, $CC'$, $A''T_A$, $B''T_B$, and $C''T_C$ are all concurrent. Call this point $Q$. Let $A''T_A$ meet $\omega_A$ again at $P_A$, and define $P_B$ and $P_C$ the same way. Since $P_AP_BA''B''$ is cyclic, $P_AP_B \parallel T_AT_B$. The same goes for $P_BP_C$ and $P_AP_C$, so $\triangle P_AP_BP_C$ is homothetic to $\triangle T_AT_BT_C$ wrt $Q$.

Note that the homothety from $A''$ takes $T_A$ to $P_A$; thus, the tangent $l_A$ to $\omega_A$ at $P_A$ is parallel to $BC$; furthermore, $A''P_A$ bisects arc $BC$ in $\omega_A$. Define $l_B$ and $l_C$ similarly; then note that from the homothety from $Q$, $(P_AP_BP_C)$ is the incircle of the triangle formed by the intersections of $l_A$, $l_B$, and $l_C$. Let $O'$ be the circumcenter of $(P_AP_BP_C)$. Then $O'P_A \perp l_A$, so $O'P_A$ is the perpendicular bisector of $BC$. In addition, $O'P_B$ and $O'P_C$ bisect $AC$ and $AB$, respectively. Thus, $O = O'$. But $O'I$ passes through $Q$ by homothety, so $OI$ passes through $Q$, as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
polya78
105 posts
#16 • 3 Y
Y by eziz, Adventure10, Mango247
As above, let $A''$ and $T_A$ be the points of tangency of (I) and $w_A$ and $BC$ respectively, etc. For notation's sake, for any point Z on (I), define ZZ to be the tangent to (I) at Z.

Again, as previously noted, by the radical axis theorem applied to $w_A$, (I) and (O), we have that $A''A''$ and ${T_AT_A}\equiv{BC}$ intersect on the radical axis of (O) and (I), which means that if M is the pole of this radical axis with respect to (I), then M (which clearly lies on $OI$) is on $A''T_A$.

Now let $\ell$ be the line through M and ${T_AB''}\cap{T_BA''}$. Since $M = {T_AA''}\cap{T_BB''}'$, by applying Pascal's Theorem to hexagons $T_AT_AA''T_BT_BB''$ and $A''A''T_AB''B''T_B$, we have that $C={T_AT_A}\cap{T_BT_B}$ is on $\ell$, as is ${A''A''}\cap{B''B''}$. Now if we consider the circles $w_A$,$w_B$, and (I), and their radical axes, we see that ${A''A''}\cap{B''B''}$, $C$ and $C'$ are collinear, which means that $C'$ is on $\ell$ as well.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
antimonyarsenide
875 posts
#17 • 3 Y
Y by eziz, Adventure10, Mango247
Very cool problem :D
My solution is not as nice as some others, but I thought it was pretty cool still.
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IDMasterz
1412 posts
#18 • 3 Y
Y by mathuz, Adventure10, Mango247
r1234 wrote:
Lemma:- Let $\ell$ be a line and $\Gamma$ be circle.Suppose $P$ is the pole of $\ell$ wrt $\Gamma$.Now let $\triangle ABC$ be inscribed in $\Gamma$.Let $\triangle A'B'C'$ be the circumcevian triangle of $\triangle ABC$ wrt $P$.Then $\ell$ is the perspective axis of $\triangle ABC$ and $\triangle A'B'C'$.

Proof:-

Let $A_1=BC\cap B'C', B_1=AC\cap A'C', C_1=AB\cap A'B'$.
Now applying Pascal's theorem on the hexagon $B'C'ABCA'$ we get $A_1,C_1, C'A\cap CA'$ are collinear.
Again $\triangle AC'B$ and $\triangle A'CB'$ are perspective.So $C_1, C'A\cap CA', BC'\cap B'C$ are collinear.Hence we conclude that $A_1,C_1, BC'\cap B'C$ are collinear.But this line is nothing but the polar of $P$ i.e $\ell$.Hence we conclude that $A_1B_1C_1\equiv \ell$.

Back to the main proof

Clearly $AA'$ is the radical axis of $\omega _b, \omega_c$, $BB'$ is the radical axis of $\omega_c, \omega_a$ and $CC'$ is the radical axis of $\omega_a, \omega_b$.So by radical axis theorem $AA', BB', CC'$ are concurrent.
Let $(I)$ be the incircle of $\triangle ABC$ and $\triangle DEF$ is its intouch triangle.$D', E', F'$ are the touch points of $(I)$ with $\omega_a, \omega_b, \omega_c$ respectively.Now let tangents at $D', E', F'$ meets $BC, CA, AB$ at $X,Y,Z$ respectively.Then its easy to show that $XYZ$ is the radical axis of $(I)$ and $\odot ABC$.So $X$ is the pole of $DD'$ wrt $(I)$ and similar for others.So $DD', EE', FF'$ concur at the pole of $XYZ$ wrt $(I)$.Now consider the circles $(I), \omega_b, \omega_c$.Then by radical axis theorem the lines $AA', E'E', F'F'$ are concurrent ,say at $X_1$.Then $X_1$ is the pole of $E'F'$ wrt $(I)$.Since $A, X_1, A'$ are collinear, their polars i.e $EF,E'F',\text{Polar of A'}$ are concurrent.So $\triangle DEF$ and the triangle formed by the polars of $A', B', C'$ are perspective wrt the perspective axis of $\triangle DEF, \triangle D'E'F'$.But according to our lemma this perspective axis is the polar of the perspective point of $\triangle DEF, \triangle D'E'F'$, i.e the radical axis of $(I), \odot ABC$.So we conclude that $AA', BB', CC'$ concur at the pole of the radical axis of $(I), \odot ABC$ wrt $(I)$.Since $IO\perp \text{Radical axis of (I),circumcircle of ABC}$ we conclude that the pole of the radical axis of $(I), \odot ABC$ lies on $IO$.Hence $AA', BB', CC'$ concur on $IO$.

Nice Lemma :) It can be generalised for any conic:

Lemma: (Generalised) Suppose line $\ell$ outside conic $\Gamma(ABC)$. Let the pole of $\ell$ wrt $\Gamma(ABC)$ be $P$ and let $A', B', C'$ be the (conic?)umcevian triangle of $P$ wrt $\triangle ABC$.

Proof: Under a projective transformation, take the conic to a circle $\odot ABC$ and $\ell$ to infinity. Then, $P$ goes to the centre of $\odot \triangle ABC$, so $\triangle A'B'C'$ and $\triangle ABC$ are homothetic, so done.

My proof goes very similar:

$T_A, T_B, T_C$ be the tangency points of those circles with the incircle. Let the tangent $\equiv \ell_A$ through $T_A$ intersect $BC$ at $X$ and define $Y, Z$ similarly. (Note that $X$ is the midpoint of $DD'$ where $D'$ is the harmonic conjugate of $D$ wrt $BC$). Then, $XYZ$ is the radical axis of $\odot ABC$ and the incircle, hence $OI \perp XYZ$. Let $P = DT_A \cap ET_B$ wrt incircle. Then, by radical axis theorem, $AA'$ meets $\ell_B \cap \ell_C$. Then by pascals we get $T_CF \cap T_BE, \ell_B \cap \ell_C, P$ are collinear. But we get $A, P, T_CF \cap T_BE$ are also collinear by pascals, so $A, \ell_B \cap \ell_C, P$ are collinear. We conclude $P$ is the radical centre. Note that $P$ is the polar of $XYZ$ of incircle, so done.

One does notice some interesting similarities. For instance, this sort of set-up was present in IMO 2002 shortlist, and 2009 Serbian MO (I think).
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
hqdhftw
82 posts
#19 • 4 Y
Y by mahanmath, eziz, Adventure10, Mango247
mahanmath wrote:
Congrats F.Ivlev ! Very very cute problem :)
Solution
Nice solution, I have another idea to prove the concurrency of $P_aT_a, P_bT_b, P_cT_c, OI$.
Let $T_bT_c \cap BC=S_a$. Similarly we define $S_bS_c$.
It's easy to see that $P_aT_a$ is the angle bisector of $\angle BPC$. Hence $P_aT_a$ is the radical axis of $(I)$ and $(P_aT_aS_a)$, which is indeed the circle with diameter $T_aS_a$ (because $(BCT_aS_a)=-1$ ). Likewise, $P_bT_b$ is the radical axis of $(I)$ and $(P_bS_bT_b)$. Consider 3 circles $(I), (P_aT_aS_a), (P_bT_bS_b)$, their radical axises concur at a point $P$. Let $H$ be the orthocenter of $\triangle T_aT_bT_c$, it's easy to prove that $HI$ is the common radical axis of 3 circles $(P_aS_aT_a), (P_bT_bS_c); (P_cS_cT_c)$, and from a well-known fact, we know that $O,I,H$ lies on the Euler line of $\triangle T_aT_bT_c$. So $P_aT_a;P_bT_c$ and $OI$ are concurrent. Similarly, we shall have all 4 lines are concurrent at $P$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
liberator
95 posts
#20 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, and 1 other user
WakeUp wrote:
Let $ABC$ be a triangle and let $I$ and $O$ denote its incentre and circumcentre respectively. Let $\omega_A$ be the circle through $B$ and $C$ which is tangent to the incircle of the triangle $ABC$; the circles $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ are defined similarly. The circles $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ meet at a point $A'$ distinct from $A$; the points $B'$ and $C'$ are defined similarly. Prove that the lines $AA',BB'$ and $CC'$ are concurrent at a point on the line $IO$.

(Russia) Fedor Ivlev
Let $\Gamma$ be the incircle of $\triangle ABC$, which is tangent to $BC,CA,AB$ at $P,Q,R$ respectively. Let $P \equiv \Gamma \cap \omega_A, Q \equiv \Gamma \cap \omega_B, R \equiv \Gamma \cap \omega_C$, and finally, let $P_1 \equiv P'P \cap \omega_A$, with similar definitions for $Q_1, R_1$.

$\Gamma$ and $\omega_A$ are homothetic center $P'$, so $P_1$ is the midpoint of the arc $\overarc{BC}$ not containing $P'$. Hence \begin{align*}\angle P_1BC = \angle P_1P'C = \angle P_1P'B \implies \triangle P_1BP \sim \triangle P_1PB \implies \frac{P_1B}{P_1P'} = \frac{P_1P}{P_1B} \implies P_1B^2 = P_1P \cdot P_1P'. \end{align*}$\therefore P_1$ is on the radical axis of $\Gamma$ and degenerate circle $B$. Similarly, $P_1$ lies on the radical axis of $\Gamma$ and $C$, with analogous results for $Q_1, R_1$.

$\therefore P_1Q_1 \perp CI \perp PQ$, with analogous results for $Q_1R_1, R_1P_1$. It follows that there exists a homothecy $\Theta: \triangle PQR \to \triangle P_1Q_1R_1$ with center $X$, the point of concurrency of $PP_1, QQ_1, RR_1$.

$PX \cdot XP' = QX \cdot XQ'$, since $PQP'Q'$ is cyclic. Noting $\frac{P_1X}{XP} = \frac{Q_1X}{XQ}$ gives $P_1X \cdot XP' = Q_1X \cdot XQ'$, so that $X$ lies on the radical axis $CC'$ of $\omega_A, \omega_B$. Similarly, $AA', BB'$ pass through $X$.

$IP \parallel OP_1$ and $IQ \parallel OQ_1$, so it follows that $O$ is the image of $I$ in $\Theta$ . Hence $AA', BB', CC'$ concur at a point on $IO$, as required.

Note: The point $X$ of the required concurrency is in fact the exsimilicenter of $\triangle ABC$, the homothetic center of the incircle and the circumcircle, and hence the homothetic center of the intouch and circummidarc triangles. It is $X_{56}$ in Kimberling's online encyclopedia of triangle centers.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pi37
2079 posts
#21 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Suppose $\omega_A,\omega_B,\omega_C$ are tangent to the incircle at $X,Y,Z$. By homothety and a well-known lemma, $XD$ intersects $\omega_A$ again at some point $M$, which is the radical center of the incircle, $B$, and $C$. Define $N,P$ similarly. Clearly $MNP$ is homothetic to the intouch triangle. But $DI\perp BC$, so $M$, the center of $\omega_A$, and the circumcenter of $MNP$ are collinear, and $(MNP)$ is tangent to $\omega_A$. Note that if $O$ is the circumcenter of $MNP$, $MO\perp BC$ and $M$ lies on the perpendicular bisector of $BC$, so $O$ is also the circumcenter of $ABC$.

We now have two circles $\Gamma_1$, the incircle and $\Gamma_2$, the circumcircle of $MNP$, with three circles $\omega_A,\omega_B,\omega_C$ externally tangent to both. We aim to show that the radical center of the three circles lies on the line through the centers of $\Gamma_1$ and $\Gamma_2$. In fact, we claim that this radical center is the exsimilicenter of $\Gamma_1$ and $\Gamma_2$. This fact holds in general, but we will use the points already defined in the problem to prove it.

Let $S$ be the exsimilicenter of the two circles. Then $S$ is the homothetic center of $DEF$ and $MNP$. By Monge's theorem or by our previous results, $S$ is collinear with $X,D,M$. So
\[
\frac{SF}{SE}=\frac{SP}{SN}
\]
and
\[
SY\cdot SF = SE\cdot SZ
\]
imply
\[
SY\cdot SP = SZ\cdot SN
\]
Therefore $S$ has equal powers with respect to $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$, so it is the radical axis of all $3$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TelvCohl
2311 posts
#23 • 8 Y
Y by tranquanghuy7198, anantmudgal09, enhanced, Adventure10, Mango247, math_comb01, David-Vieta, MS_asdfgzxcvb
My solution :

Let $ D\equiv \odot (I) \cap BC, E\equiv\odot (I) \cap CA, F\equiv\odot (I) \cap AB $ .
Let $ X\equiv\omega_A \cap \odot (I), Y\equiv\omega_B \cap \odot (I), Z\equiv\omega_C \cap \odot (I) $ .
Let $ \mathcal{P}(P, \odot) $ be the power of a point $ P $ with respect to a circle $ \odot $

From homothety with center $ X $ ( maps $ \odot (I) \mapsto \omega_A $ ) $ \Longrightarrow M_A\equiv XD \cap \omega_A $ is the midpoint of arc $ BC $ in $ \omega_A $ .
Similarly, $ M_B\equiv YE \cap \omega_B, M_C\equiv ZF \cap \omega_C $ is the midpoint of arc $ CA $, arc $ AB $ in $ \omega_B, \omega_C $, respectively .

Since $ \mathcal{P}(M_B,\odot(I))=\mathcal{P}(M_B,C)=\mathcal{P}(M_B,A), \mathcal{P}(M_C,\odot(I))=\mathcal{P}(M_C,B)=\mathcal{P}(M_C,A) $ ,
so $ M_BM_C $ is the radical axis of $ \{ \odot (I), A \} \Longrightarrow M_BM_C $ pass through the midpoint of $ AE $ and $ AF $ .
Similarly, $ M_CM_A, M_AM_B $ is B-midline, C-midline of $ \triangle BFD, \triangle CDE $, resp $ \Longrightarrow \triangle DEF , \triangle M_AM_BM_C $ are homothetic .

Let $ T \equiv M_AD \cap M_BE \cap M_CF $ be the homothety center of $ \triangle DEF $ and $ \triangle M_AM_BM_C $ .

From Reim theorem and $ M_BM_C \parallel EF \Longrightarrow Y, Z, M_B, M_C $ are concyclic ,
so $ T $ is the radical center of $ \{ \odot (YZM_BM_C), \omega_B, \omega_C \} \Longrightarrow \mathcal{P}(T, \omega_B )=\mathcal{P}(T, \omega_C ) \Longrightarrow T \in AA' $ .
Similarly, we can prove $ T \in BB' $ and $ T \in CC' \Longrightarrow AA', BB', CC' $ are concurrent at $ T $ .

From $ ID \parallel OM_A, IE \parallel OM_B, IF \parallel OM_C \Longrightarrow \triangle DEF \cup I $ and $ \triangle M_AM_BM_C \cup O $ are homothetic $ \Longrightarrow T \in OI $ .

Q.E.D
____________________________________________________________
Remark :

It's well-known that $ TD, TE, TF $ pass through the A-excenter $ I_a $ , B-excenter $ I_b $ , C-excenter $ I_c $ of $ \triangle ABC $, respectively ( see here ) , so $ T $ is the homothety center of $ \triangle DEF $ and $ \triangle I_aI_bI_c \Longrightarrow T $ is $ X_{57} $ ( in ETC ) of $ \triangle ABC $ .
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Luis González
4145 posts
#24 • 3 Y
Y by tranquanghuy7198, Adventure10, Mango247
Incircle $(I)$ touches $BC,CA,AB$ at $D,E,F$ and $\omega_A,\omega_B,\omega_C$ touch $(I)$ at $T_A,T_B,T_C.$ Denote $\tau_A,\tau_B,\tau_c$ the tangents of $(I)$ at $T_A,T_B,T_C$ and $X \equiv \tau_b \cap \tau_C,$ $Y \equiv \tau_C \cap \tau_A,$ $Z \equiv \tau_A \cap \tau_B.$ Since $XT_B=XT_C,$ then $X$ is on radical axis $AA'$ of $\omega_B,\omega_C$ and similarly $Y \in BB'$ and $Z \in CC'$ $\Longrightarrow$ $\triangle ABC$ and $\triangle XYZ$ are perspective through the radical center $T$ of $\omega_A,\omega_B,\omega_C$ and their perspectrix is the radical axis $\tau$ of $(I),(O).$

Since $\tau$ does not intersect $(I),$ then there exists a homology sendind $\tau$ to infinity and taking $(I)$ into another circle $(J).$ Thus in this figure, $\triangle ABC$ and $\triangle XYZ$ become symmetric WRT $J$ $\Longrightarrow$ $AX,BY,CZ,DT_A,ET_B,FT_C$ concur at $J;$ their common midpoint. Hence, in the original figure $AA' \equiv AX,$ $BB' \equiv BY,$ $CC' \equiv CZ,$ $DT_A,$ $ET_B,$ $FT_C$ concur at $T \equiv X_{57}$ lying on $OI.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
JuanOrtiz
366 posts
#25 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
A nice result!

Solution

Q.E.D.

An additional challenge would be to prove that $AX,BY,CZ$ are concurrent, which is true!

Proof of this additional result
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by JuanOrtiz, Jun 26, 2015, 8:13 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
drmzjoseph
445 posts
#26 • 3 Y
Y by TelvCohl, Adventure10, Mango247
Let $\triangle MNP$ be the intouch triangle of $\triangle ABC$, and let $\gamma$ be the incircle. Now $\omega_b$ and $\omega_c$ touch to $\gamma$ at $B_1$ and $C_1$ respectively, and the common tangents from this points cut at $A'', X \equiv B_1N \cap C_1P$, From Pascal's Theorem for fourth points in $B_1,C_1,P,N$ we get $A,X$ and $A''$ are collinear, also by radical axis on $\omega_b,\omega_c$ and $\gamma$ we get $A'' \in AA' \Rightarrow X \in AA'$
Moreover the common tangent between $\omega_b$ and the incircle touch $AC$ at $B_2$, let $\ell$ be the radical axis between $\gamma$ and $\odot (ABC)$, by radical axis theorem on $\gamma, \odot (ABC), \omega$ we get $B_2 \in \ell$, so the polar lines of $A_2,B_2,C_2$ (defined analogously) with respect to $\gamma$ are concurrent at $IO$,( the pole of $\ell)$, and this point is $X$ is a point fixed that belongs to $AA'$ and $IO$ as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
toto1234567890
889 posts
#27 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
It's just a point that out-divides OI as R+r/2:r ;)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ABCDE
1963 posts
#28 • 3 Y
Y by mymathboy, Adventure10, Mango247
Let the incircle be tangent to $BC$ and $\omega_A$ at $D$ and $D'$ respectively and similarly define $E$, $F$, $E'$, and $F'$. Let $D'D$ intersect $\omega_A$ again at $K_a$, and define $K_b$ and $K_c$ similarly. By homothety, we have that $K_a$ is the midpoint of arc $BC$ on $\omega_A$. Inversion about $K_a$ with radius $K_aB=K_aC$ swaps line $BC$ with $\omega_A$, so $K_aB^2=K_aC^2=K_aD\cdot K_aD'$. Hence, $K_a$ is the radical center of $B$, $C$, and the incircle.

Note that $K_aK_bK_c$ is homothetic with $DEF$ because $K_b$ and $K_c$ both lie on the radical axis of $A$ and the incircle which is parallel to $EF$. Let $L$ be the center of homothety of $K_aK_bK_c$ and $DEF$. The perpendiculars from $D$ to $BC$, $E$ to $CA$, and $F$ to $AB$ concur at $I$, and the perpendiculars from $K_a$ to $BC$, $K_b$ to $CA$, and $K_c$ to $AB$ concur at $O$. Hence, $L$ lies on $IO$. Now, note that by Power of a Point $LD\cdot LD'=LE\cdot LE'=LF\cdot LF'$ and because it's the center of homothety $LK_a\cdot LD'=LK_b\cdot LE'=LK_c\cdot LF'$, so $L$ is the radical center of $\omega_A$, $\omega_B$, and $\omega_C$, or where $AA'$, $BB'$, and $CC'$ concur.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
anantmudgal09
1979 posts
#29 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Define $I_A, I_B, I_C$ as the excenters of triangle $ABC$ corresponding to the vertices in the indices. Let $DEF$ be the contact triangle of $ABC$. It is well-known that triangles $DEF$ and $I_AI_BI_C$ are homothetic. Define $T$ as the center of this homothety and note that $T$ lies on the line $IO$ dividing it in the ratio $2r \, : \, 2R+r$. We will show that lines $AA',BB',CC'$ are concurrent at $T$.

Let $\omega_A$ touch $\omega$ at $P$. Dilation at $P$ mapping $\omega_A$ to $\omega$ implies $PD$ bisects angle $BPC$. From IMO ShortList 2002 G7, we know $I_A$ lies on line $PD$. Let the $A$-excircle touch side $BC$ at $K$ and $M$ be the intersection of perpendicular bisector of $BC$ with $DI_A$. Obviously, $MD=MK \Longrightarrow MD=MI_A$ and from Fact 5, we know $M$ lies on $\omega_A$.

Finally, we observe that $$\operatorname{Pow}(T, \omega_A)=TP\cdot TM=\frac{TD}{TM}\cdot \operatorname{Pow}(T, \omega)=\frac{2r}{2R+r}\cdot (TI^2-r^2),$$which is symmetric. It follows that $T$ is the radical center of $\omega_A, \omega_B, \omega_C$. Lines $AA', BB', CC'$ are concurrent at $T$, which lies on $IO$. $\, \square$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mathcool2009
352 posts
#30 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Let $(I),(O)$ denote the incircle, circumcircle of triangle $ABC$ respectively.

Let $\ell$ be the radical axis of $(I)$ and $(O)$, and let $P_a, P_b, P_c$ be the intersections of $\ell$ with lines $BC, CA, AB$ respectively. Define $D,E,F$ as the intersections of $(I)$ with lines $BC, CA, AB$ respectively. Define $D', E', F'$ as the reflections of $D,E,F$ about lines $P_aI, P_bI, P_cI$ respectively.

By the Radical Axis Theorem on $\omega_A, (I), (O)$, we have that $P_a$ is the radical center of these three circles, so $P_a$ lies on the radical axis of $\omega_A$ and $(I)$. This means that $D'$ lies on $\omega_A$, so $\omega_A = (BD'C)$. Similarly, $\omega_B = (CE'A)$ and $\omega_C = (AF'B)$.

Now we will use the Radical Axis Theorem on $\omega_A, \omega_B, (I)$. Letting $C''$ be the intersection of $P_aD'$ and $P_bE'$, we see that $C,C',C''$ are collinear. Thus we only need to show that $AA'',BB'',CC'',IO$ are concurrent, where $A'',B''$ are defined similarly.

Focus on $(I)$. Let $X$ be the intersection of lines $DD', EE'$. Note that $X$ is the pole of $\ell$, so $X$ also lies on $FF'$. Let $Q_c$ be the intersection of lines $DE, D'E'$. Define $Q_a, Q_b$ similarly. Note that $Q_c$ is the pole of line $CC''$. But we also know that $X$ lies on the polar of $Q_c$ (by Brokard's Theorem). Thus $CC''$ passes through $X$. We see immediately that $AA'', BB'',CC'', IO$ concur at $X$, as desired. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Kayak
1298 posts
#31 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Isn't this a bit easy for a RMM P6 ? Or maybe because I was lucky to try (but fail to solve) 2002 ISL G7 today... Anways, here's a solution using geogebra

Define $E_A$ to be the $A$-excircle, $T_A$ to be the touchpoint of the incircle with $\overline{BC}$, $X_A$ to be the touchpoint of $\omega_A$ with incircle $\omega$ and $F_A$ to be the midpoint of $\overline{E_AT_A}$. Define $E_B, E_C, X_B, X_C, F_B, F_C, T_B, T_C$ similarly.

By v_enhance's solution to 2002 ISL G7, we have
  • $E_A, F_A, T_A, X_A$ colinear
  • $F_A \in \omega_A$

A very easy angle chasing gives $E_BE_C || T_BT_C$, and similarly for the other sides, so $E_AT_A, T_BE_B, T_CE_C$ concur at a point $Y$, the center of homothety mapping $\Delta T_AT_BT_C$ to $\Delta E_AE_BE_C$. I claim that $Y$ is the desired concurrency point.

Indeed, letting $X$ be the circumcircle of $\Delta E_AE_BE_C$.
  • Observe that by very easy angle chasing/very well known lemma, $O$ and $I$ are the nine-point center and orthocenter of $\Delta E_AE_BE_C$, so $X,O,I$ are collinear (they all lie on the Euler line of $\Delta E_AE_BE_C$). Since a homothety at $Y$ maps $\Delta T_AT_BT_C$ to $\Delta E_AE_BE_C$, the same homothety maps (Circumcenter of $\Delta T_AT_BT_C = I$) to (Circumcenter of $\Delta T_AT_BT_C = X$) too, so $I, X, Y$ are colinear. So together, we have $O, I, X, Y$ colinear, or $Y \in OI$
  • By radical center theorem, clearly $AA', BB', CC'$ are concurrent, and the concurrency point is the radical center of $\{ \omega_A, \omega_B, \omega_C \}$. So we need to show that $Pow_Y(\omega_A)$ is symmetric in $A,B,C$. But this is not hard. Note that $\frac{YE_A}{YT_A} = \frac{YX}{YI}$ for homothety reasons.

    So $$ Pow_Y(\omega_A) = YX_A \cdot YF_A = \frac{YX_A \cdot YE_A}{2} = \frac{1}{2} \cdot (YX_A \cdot YT_A) \cdot (\frac{YE_A}{YT_A}) = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{YX}{YI}) (Pow_Y(Incircle))$$, which is evidently symmetric in $A, B,C$

https://i.stack.imgur.com/VxBkt.png
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Kayak, Nov 26, 2018, 5:35 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
khina
993 posts
#32 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Funcshun840
Surprisingly, I don't think anyone has this sol yet. It's actually rather short, but yeah this problem is really cute. I do think that it is kind of ruined by 2002 ISL G7 though because this makes it more of an "extension" than a standalone problem, but this is still a pretty cool problem.

solution
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by khina, Dec 2, 2019, 7:44 PM
Reason: Added IO part
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
yayups
1614 posts
#33 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
//cdn.artofproblemsolving.com/images/c/9/2/c92b6b5e34413a21f9b98e2add6e46d84d14e7f4.jpg
Let $DEF$ be the contact triangle of $ABC$, and let $I_AI_BI_C$ be the excentral triangle. We claim the desired point is $P$, the exsimilicenter of $(DEF)$ and $(I_AI_BI_C)$. This lies on the line joining their centers, which is the Euler line of $I_AI_BI_C$. It's well known that $O$ is on this Euler line (by incircle inversion), so $P\in OI$. It suffices now to show that $P$ has equal power with respect to the circles $\omega_A$, $\omega_B$, $\omega_C$. Note that the triangles $DEF$ and $I_AI_BI_C$ are homothetic (USAMTS Round 2 anyone?), so $P=I_AD\cap I_BE\cap I_CF$. Let the scale factor be $k$, so $PI_A/PD=PI_B/PE=PI_C/PF=k$.

The main idea to this problem is ISL 2002 G7, but we'll show the relevant pieces here without citation. We'll show that $I_AD$ passes through $X$, the tangency point of $\omega_A$ and the incircle, and that the other intersection $X'$ of $I_AD$ with $\omega_A$ is the midpoint of $I_AD$. This finishes, because then the power of $P$ with respect to $\omega_A$ is
\[PX\cdot PX' = PX\cdot PD\cdot\frac{k+1}{2} = \frac{k+1}{2}\mathrm{Pow}_{(DEF)}(P),\]which is symmetric in $A$, $B$, $C$. Now we'll show the claims.

It's well known that $M,D,I_A$ are collinear (here $M$ is the midpoint of the altitude $AU$), so to show $X,D,I_A$ collinear, it suffices to show that $X,M,D$ collinear, or that $M$ is on the polar of $T$ with respect to $\omega:=(DEF)$, or that $T$ is on the polar of $M$ with respect to $\omega$. Here $T$ is the intersection of the common tangent to $\omega$ and $\omega_A$ with $BC$. Define the projective map from line $AU$ to line $BC$ by sending $G\in AU$ to the intersection of the polar of $G$ with respect to $\omega$ with $BC$. This preserves cross ratio, so
\[-1=(AU;M\infty) = (SD;T'\infty),\]where $S=EF\cap BC$, and $T'$ is the intersection of the polar of $M$ with $BC$. It suffices to show that $T'=T$, so it suffices to show $T$ is the midpoint of $DS$. Indeed, we have
\[TD^2=TX^2=TB\cdot TC,\]so $B$ and $C$ are harmonic conjugate in $DS'$, where $S'=2D-T$. But we know $(BC;DS)=-1$, so we're done. This shows that $X,D,I_A$ collinear.

Now we'll show that $X'$ is the midpoint of $DI_A$. Note that $TD=TS=TX$, so $X$ is on the semicircle with diameter $DS$, so $\angle DXS=\pi/2$. Furthermore, we have $(BC;DS)=-1$, so we must have that $XD$ and $XS$ are the internal and external angle bisectors of $\angle BXC$. Thus, $X'$ is the arc midpoint of $BC$ in $\omega_A$, so $X'L$ is the perpendicular bisector of $BC$, where $L$ is the arc midpoint of $BC$ in $(ABC)$. Thus, $X'L\parallel DI$, and since $L$ is the midpoint of $II_A$, we see that $X'$ is the midpoint of $DI_A$.

This completes the proof as we showed how the above claims imply the problem.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
maryam2002
69 posts
#34
Y by
khina wrote:
Surprisingly, I don't think anyone has this sol yet. It's actually rather short, but yeah this problem is really cute. I do think that it is kind of ruined by 2002 ISL G7 though because this makes it more of an "extension" than a standalone problem, but this is still a pretty cool problem.

solution



Why can you use brianchon ?
would you pleas explain it more ?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
rcorreaa
238 posts
#35
Y by
Let $D,E,F$ the touching points of $\omega$ on $BC,CA,AB$ and $A_1$ be the tangency point of $\omega_A, \omega$. Define $B_1,C_1$ similarly. Furthermore, let $X=EF \cap BC$ and $M_A$ the midpoint of $XD$. $Y,Z,M_B,M_C$ are defined similarly.

By ISL 2002 G7, $A_1,D,I_A$ are collinear, where $I_A$ is the $A$-excenter of $ABC$. Therefore, $A_2=A_1A_1 \cap BC$ satisfies $A_2A_1^2=A_2B.A_2C$, but since it's well known that $(B,C;D;X)=-1$, and the midpoint $M_A$ of $XD$ also satisfies $XD^2=XB.XC$, we have that $A_2=X$. Furthermore, $X,Y,Z$ are collinear, because $XYZ$ is the radical axis of $(ABC), \omega$ (all of them have same power of point WRT $(ABC),\omega$).

Now, observe that $\Pi_{\omega}(X)=DA_1, \Pi_{\omega}(Y)=EB_1,\Pi_{\omega}(Z)=FC_1$, so since $X,Y,Z$ are collinear, $DA_1,EB_1,FC_1$ are concurrent. Let $P= DA_1 \cap EB_1 \cap FC_1$. By La Hire's Theorem, $\Pi_{\omega}(P)= \ell$, where $\ell$ is the line $XYZ$. Thus, $IP \perp \ell$. On the other hand, since $\ell$ is the radical axis of $(ABC), \omega$, we have that $OI \perp \ell$, so $O,I,P$ are collinear. By Pascal's Theorem on $EEB_1FFC_1$ and $B_1B_1EC_1C_1F$, we have that $Q_A=B_1B_1 \cap C_1C_1$ lies on $AP$. Also, by the Radical Axis Theorem on $\omega_B,\omega_C,\omega$, $Q_A$ lies on $AA'$, so $P$ lies on $AA'$. Similarly $P$ lies on $BB',CC'$, and since $P \in OI$, we are done.

$\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
GeronimoStilton
1521 posts
#36 • 4 Y
Y by centslordm, Mango247, Mango247, Mango247
Solution with help from khina :heart_eyes:

Let $\omega$ denote the incircle. The first step is to identify the concurrence point. Let $\triangle DEF$ denote the intouch triangle and $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ denote the excentral triangle of $\triangle ABC$. Since the two triangles are similar with parallel sides they have a center of homothety $T$ that lies on the line through the two circumcenters of the triangles, or $IO$. We spend the rest of the proof showing $T$ lies on $AA'$, which suffices by symmetry.

By ISL 2002 G7, the circle through $B$ and $C$ tangent to $\omega$ passes through the second intersection of $DI_A$ and $\omega$, or $U$. Define $V,W$ similarly. It is enough to show that $EV,FW,AA'$ concur. Clearly $A_1=WW\cap VV$ lies on $AA'$, so it is enough to show $AA_1,EV,FW$ concur. Now the problem ought to be true no matter what configuration $E,V,F,W$ form: take a homography sending $EV\cap FW$ to the center of $\omega$, then the result follows by symmetry, since $A=EE\cap FF$ and $A_1=VV\cap WW$.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by GeronimoStilton, May 16, 2021, 1:50 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mogmog8
1080 posts
#37 • 3 Y
Y by centslordm, megarnie, crazyeyemoody907
Let $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ and $\triangle DEF$ be the excentral and incentral triangles of $\triangle ABC,$ respectively, and let $\omega_A,\omega_B,$ and $\omega_C$ touch $\omega$ at $P,Q,$ and $R,$ respectively. Also, let $S=\overline{QQ}\cap\overline{RR},$ $T=\overline{EQ}\cap\overline{FR}$ and $U=\overline{ER}\cap\overline{FQ},$ noticing $S$ lies on $\overline{AA'}$ by Radical Axis. By ISL 2002/G7, $P,Q,$ and $R$ lie on $\overline{DI_A},\overline{EI_B},$ and $\overline{FI_C},$ and by Vietnam TST 2003/2, $T$ lies on $\overline{IO}$ and $\overline{DI_A}.$ Also, $S$ and $A$ both lie on $\overline{TU}$ by Pascal on $QQFRRE$ and $EERFFQ,$ respectively. Similarly, $T$ also lies on $\overline{BB'}$ and $\overline{CC'}.$ $\square$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Mogmog8, Jan 15, 2022, 3:46 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
crazyeyemoody907
450 posts
#38 • 1 Y
Y by Rounak_iitr
[asy]
//setup
size(13cm); 
pen blu,grn,lightblu; blu=RGB(102,153,255); grn=RGB(0,204,0); lightblu=RGB(196,216,255);
//defns
pair A,B,C,I,O,D,E,F,H; A=(-1,10); B=(0,0); C=(14,0); I=incenter(A,B,C); O=circumcenter(A,B,C); D=foot(I,B,C); E=foot(I,C,A); F=foot(I,A,B); H=D+E+F-2*I;
path w=incircle(A,B,C);

pair Ka,Kb,Kc; Ka=extension(E,F,B,C); Kb=extension(D,F,A,C); Kc=extension(D,E,A,B);
path ya,yb,yc; ya=circle((Ka+D)/2,distance(D,Ka)/2); yb=circle((Kb+E)/2,distance(E,Kb)/2); yc=circle((Kc+F)/2,distance(F,Kc)/2);
pair Ja,Jb,Jc; Ja=foot(D,Ka,2I-D); Jb=foot(E,Kb,2I-E); Jc=foot(F,Kc,2I-F); 
path wa,wb,wc; wa=circumcircle(B,C,Ja); wb=circumcircle(C,A,Jb); wc=circumcircle(A,B,Jc);

pair Ta=foot(D,E,F); pair U=2*circumcenter(I,Jb,Jc)-I; 
pair X=extension(D,Ja,E,Jb);
//draw
filldraw(D--E--F--cycle,lightblu,blu);
draw(A--B--C--A--D--E--F--D--Ka--F,blu); draw(w,blu+dashdotted);
draw(D--Ta,purple+dotted);
draw(ya,purple); draw(yb,purple); draw(yc,purple);
draw(4*I-3*H--3*H-2*I,linewidth(1));
draw(D--Ja^^E--Jb^^F--Jc,grn+linewidth(1));
draw(wb,red); draw(wc,red);
draw(Jb--U--Jc,red);
draw(A--U,magenta+linewidth(1));
clip((-7,-15)--(-7,12)--(13,12)--(15,10)--(15,-15)--cycle);


//label
label("$A$",A,dir(120)); label("$B$",B,-dir(80)); label("$C$",C,dir(-50));
label("$D$",D,dir(120)); label("$E$",E,dir(90)); label("$F$",F,dir(120)); 
label("$K_a$",Ka,-dir(20));label("$J_a$",Ja,dir(20)); 
label("$J_b$",Jb,-dir(80)); label("$J_c$",Jc,dir(70)); 
label("$U$",U,-dir(90)); label("$X$",X,dir(-90)); 
label("$\textcolor{red}{\omega_b}$",(14,1.2)); label("$\textcolor{red}{\omega_c}$",(-4,8));
label("$\textcolor[rgb]{.6,0,1}{\gamma_a}$",(-5,2.8));
label("$\textcolor[rgb]{.6,0,1}{\gamma_b}$",(6.5,10.5));
label("$\textcolor[rgb]{.6,0,1}{\gamma_c}$",(6,-4));
[/asy]
This is actually a nice config... let $K_a=\overline{EF}\cap\overline{BC}$, $\gamma_a=(K_aD)$, and cyclic variants. Let $H,\ell$ denote the orthocenter and Euler line of $\triangle DEF$, respectively.

Observe that $\overline{OI}$ is just $\ell$, and that $\gamma_a$, etc are coaxial Apollonian circles. Define $X$ as the radical center of $\gamma_a,\gamma_b,\gamma_c,\omega$ (which exists since the former 3 circles are coaxial). We'll show this is the desired concurrency point. Also, define $J_a=\omega_a\cap\gamma_a\cap\omega$ and variants. Clearly, $\overline{DJ_a}$ is the raxis of $(\gamma_a,\omega)$, i.e. $X\in\overline{DJ_a}$.

Lemma 1: $\ell$ is the raxis of $\gamma_a$ and variants.
Proof
To finish, let tangents to $\omega$ at $J_b,J_c$ meet @ $U$; then, $\overline{AU}$ is the raxis of $\omega_b,\omega_c$. Clearly this is the polar of $\overline{J_bJ_c}\cap\overline{EF}$. Recalling that $X=\overline{EJ_b}\cap\overline{FJ_c}$, follows by Brokard that $X\in\overline{AU}$, the end.

Remark: This concurrency point also appears inm Brazil 2013/6...
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by crazyeyemoody907, Nov 19, 2022, 2:02 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
5000 posts
#39 • 1 Y
Y by GeoKing
Let $DEF$ be the intouch triangle and $\omega$ be the incircle. Let $T_A$ be the intersection of the midlines of $\triangle BDF$ and $\triangle CDE$, i.e. the radical center of $B$, $C$, and $\omega$; define $T_B$ and $T_C$ similarly. Then $\omega_A$ is the circle $(BCT_A)$ by a well-known lemma. Finally, let $M_A$ be the midpoint of arc $BC$ not containing $A$, and define $M_B$ and $M_C$ similarly.

Now note that $AA'$, $BB'$, and $CC'$ concur by radical center. Invert about this point fixing $\omega_A$, $\omega_B$, and $\omega_C$. Then $\omega$ is sent to some circle internally tangent to $\omega_A,\omega_B,\omega_C$, and hence the radical center lies on the line joining $I$ with the center of this circle. Note that $\overline{T_BT_C}$, $\overline{EF}$, and $\overline{M_BM_C}$ are all parallel, and cyclic variants hold. Thus $\triangle T_AT_BT_C$ and $\triangle DEF$ are homothetic. Since $D$ is the "lowest" point in $\omega$, $T_A$ is thus the "lowest" point in $(T_AT_BT_C)$; since it's also clearly the "lowest" point in $(BCT_A)$ it follows that $(T_AT_BT_C)$ and $(BCT_A)$ are tangent. Cyclic variants hold as well, so it follows that $\omega$ gets sent to $(T_AT_BT_C)$. Further, note that $\triangle T_AT_BT_C$ and $\triangle M_AM_BM_C$ are homothetic. Since $\overline{T_AM_A}$ is the perpendicular bisector of $\overline{BC}$ and similar statements hold, it follows that $O$ is the center of homothety; hence $O$ is also the center of $(T_AT_BT_C)$, which finishes. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AdventuringHobbit
164 posts
#40
Y by
Let the tangency points of the circles be $T_A$, $T_B$, and $T_C$. Let $P$ be the radical center. Let $DEF$ by the intouch triangle of $ABC$. Then we know that the intersections of the tangents at $T_B$ and $T_C$ to the incircle are on AA' by radax. Also the intersection of the tangents at $E$ and $F$ are on the radax. Then in follows that $FT_C \cap ET_B$ is on $AA'$ since it is known that quadrilaterals with incircles have the same intersection of diagonals as their tangential quadrilateral. Now let $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ be the poles of $DT_A$, $ET_B$, $FT_C$. Observe that since $XT_A^2=XB \cdot XC$ that $X$ is on the radical axis of $(ABC)$ and $(DEF)$. So $XYZ$ is a line that is exactly the radax of $(ABC)$ and $(DEF)$. Then the pole of $XYZ$ must be on $T_AD$, $T_BE$, and $T_CF$. Thus the pole of $XYZ$ is $P$ from the concurrences from earlier. Since $XYZ \perp OI$, it follows that $P$ is on $OI$, so we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
DottedCaculator
7313 posts
#41
Y by
https://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/texer/a/atxwdqpk.png?time=1708984849006

Let $DEF$ be the intouch triangle, let $I_A$, $I_B$, and $I_C$ be the excenters. Let $A_1$ be the foot from $I$ to $DI_A$, let $A_2$ be the reflection of $D$ over $A_1$, and let $M_A$ be the midpoint of $DI_A$. Since $BCA_1II_A$ is cyclic, $DB\cdot DC=DA_1\cdot DI_A=DA_2\cdot DM_A$, which implies $BCA_2M_A$ is cyclic. Since $A_2$ lies on the incircle and $DM_A$, the homothety centered at $A_2$ mapping $D$ to $M_A$ must map the incircle to the circumcircle of $BCA_2M_A$, so $A_2$ lies on $\omega_A$.

Therefore, since $DEF$ and $I_AI_BI_C$ are homothetic, the triangle formed by the midpoints of $DI_A$, $EI_B$, and $FI_C$, which is $M_AM_BM_C$ is homothetic to $DEF$. Let $X$ be the center of homothety of those triangles. $\operatorname{Pow}_{\omega_A}(X)=XA_2\cdot XM_A=\operatorname{Pow}_{(DEF)}(X)\frac{XM_A}{XD}$, so since $\frac{XM_A}{XD}$ is the ratio of homothety from $M_AM_BM_C$ to $DEF$, $X$ is the point of concurrency of $AA'$, $BB'$, and $CC'$, which lies on $IO$.
This post has been edited 7 times. Last edited by DottedCaculator, Feb 26, 2024, 10:02 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Akacool
14 posts
#42 • 1 Y
Y by Mutse
Let $DEF$ be the contact triangle of $ABC$, and let $I_AI_BI_C$ be the excentral triangle. We claim the desired point is $P$, the exsimilicenter of $(DEF)$ and $(I_AI_BI_C)$.
We claim that the intersection of $\omega_A$ and the incircle lies on the line $I_AD$.
Lets take base of altitude of $A$ as $D$ and the midpoint of $AD$ as $M$, intersection of $EF$ and $BC$ as $Y$, antipode of $D$ wrt incircle as $Z$, the intersection of incircle and $I_AD$ as $K$.
We can easily see that by taking a pencil on $D$ that $LDKZ$ is a harmonic quadrilateral. Which implies that $Y$, $L$ and $Z$ are collinear. Because $(Y, D; B, C) = -1$ and take $X$ as midpoint of segment $YD$ it becomes clear that $XD^2 = XB \cdot XC$ it further implies that $XK$ is tangent to $\omega_A$ which proves the claim.
Then we can further assume that midpoint of $I_AD$ lies on $\omega_A$. This comes from that $KI_A$ is angle bisector of $\angle BKC$ and midpoint of $KI_A$ lying on the perpendicular bisector of $BC$.
Now finally we just have to prove that power of point of $P$ wrt to the three circles are equal. If we take the midpoints of $I_AD$, $I_BE$ and $I_CF$ as $V$, $U$ and $W$.
Which is same as proving $T_AP \cdot PV=T_BP \cdot PU$ which comes from the fact that triangles $(DEF)$ and $(I_AI_BI_C)$ are homothetic. $T_AT_BDE$ is cyclic and
$DE$ and $UV$ being parallel implies the result. Now the homothety form $P$ takes circumcenter of $(I_AI_BI_C)$ to $I$ so it means that $P$ lies on the Euler line of triangle $(I_AI_BI_C)$ which is indeed $OI$ proving the result.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Akacool, Apr 26, 2024, 2:40 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mcmp
50 posts
#43
Y by
Nvm this solution has been posted before. Why is this question so projective however.

First I claim that if $\omega_a$ is tangent to incircle $\omega=(DEF)$ at $T_a$ and other cyclic definitions then $T_aD$, $T_bE$, $T_cF$ concur on $OI$. Let the tangents at $T_a$ and $D$ of $\omega$ concur at $S_a$. Takes the polar dual of this entire configuration. I claim that the poles of $T_aD$, $T_bE$ and $T_cF$, which are $S_a$, $S_b$ and $S_c$ respectively, are collinear. Note however $S_aT_a^2=S_aB\cdot S_aC$, and hence $S_a$s power to both $\omega$ and $\Omega=(ABC)$ are the same. Hence $S_a$, $S_b$, $S_c$ lie on the radical axis of $\Omega$ and $\omega$. Hence we are done as then $\overline{S_aS_bS_c}$s pole, $S$, is a point on $OI$.

Now consider $A_1$ as the intersection of the tangent to $T_b$ and $T_c$ to $\omega$; I claim that $A_1$ lies on $AA_1$, which is just the radical axis of $\omega_b$ and $\omega_c$. However this follows from radical axis from $\omega$, $\omega_b$ and $\omega_c$. However $AA_1$ also passes through $S$ by Brianchon on the degenerate hexagon $AFXA’T_cYE$ and $AXT_bA’YE$ ($X=\overline{AF}\cap\overline{A’T_b}$ and $Y=\overline{AE}\cap\overline{A’T_c}$). Thus we are done (surprisingly quickly!)
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by mcmp, Nov 22, 2024, 4:35 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
hectorleo123
339 posts
#44
Y by
Let $Q$ and $R$ be the points of tangency of $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ with the incircle, let $I_B$ and $I_C$ be the $B-$excenter and the $C-$excenter respectively, let $E$ and $F$ be the points of tangency of the incircle with $AC$ and $AB$ respectively.
By 2002 ISL G7 we know that $I_B, E, Q$ and $I_C, F, R$ are collinear
We also know that $X_{57}$ is the homothetic center of the intouch triangle and the excentral triangle$\Rightarrow X_{57}\equiv I_BE\cap I_CF$
Let $Y$ be the midpoint of $I_BE$ and $Z$ the midpoint of $I_CF$, we know that $QE$ passes through the midpoint of arc $AC$ in $\omega_B\Rightarrow Y\in \omega_B$, analogously $Z\in\omega_C$, and $EF//I_BI_C$(trivial)
$\Rightarrow \frac{X_{57}Y}{X_{57}E}=\frac{X_{57}Z}{X_{57}F}$ and we know $X_{57}E.X_{57}Q=X_{57}F.X_{57}R$
$\Rightarrow X_{57}Y.X_{57}Q=X_{57}Z.X_{57}R \Rightarrow X_{57}$ is on the radical axis of $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C \Rightarrow A,X_{57},A'$ are colinear $\Rightarrow AA',BB'$ and $CC'$ are concurrent in $X_{57}$ which, being the center of homothecy of the contact triangle and the excentral triangle is on the Euler line of $I_AI_BI_C$ which is the line $IO_\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cursed_tangent1434
557 posts
#45
Y by
Falls apart after 2002 G7 so most proofs of claims will be borrowed from this problem. Let $\triangle DEF$ be the intouch triangle and $\triangle I_aI_bI_c$ the excentral triangle. Let $P$ , $Q$ and $R$ denote the tangency points of $\omega_A$ , $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ with the incircle respectively. Let $L$ , $M$ and $N$ denote the midpoints of segments $DI_a$ , $EI_b$ and $FI_c$ respectively.

From these solutions to Shortlist 2002 G7 we already know that points $P$ , $D$ and $I_a$ (and similarly) are collinear and point $P$ lies on $(BFI_a)$ and $(CEI_a)$ (and similarly) and also from Fake USAMO 2020/3 we know that circles $(AEI_b)$ and $(AFI_c)$ intersect at the $A-$Evan is Old Point $E_{Oa}$ which lies on $(ABC)$. Since $\triangle DEF$ and $\triangle I_aI_bI_c$ are clearly homothetic, lines $DI_a$ , $EI_b$ and $FI_c$ concur at the point $X_{57}$ which must lie on $\overline{IO}$. Also by the Midpoint theorem, $\triangle LMN$ is also homothetic to these two triangles. Thus, we only need to show the following claim.

Claim : Point $X_{57}$ lies on the pairwise radical axes of circles $\omega_A$ , $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$.

Proof : This is a simple length calculation. Note,
\[X_{57}P \cdot X_{57}L=\frac{X_{57}P \cdot X_{57}I_a \cdot X_{57}L}{X_{57}I_a} = \frac{X_{57}B\cdot X_{57}E_{Ob}\cdot X_{57}L}{X_{57}I_a} = \frac{X_{57}B \cdot X_{57}E_{Ob}\cdot X_{57}N}{X_{57}I_c} = \frac{X_{57}R \cdot X_{57}I_c \cdot X_{57}N}{X_{57}I_c}= X_{57}R \cdot X_{57}N\]which implies that $X_{57}$ lies on the radical axis of circles $\omega_A$ and $\omega_C$. Thus $\overline{BX_{57}}$ is the Radical Axis of circles $\omega_A$ and $\omega_C$. A similar argument shows that $\overline{AX_{57}}$ and $\overline{CX_{57}}$ are the other two pairwise Radical Axes. Thus, these lines $AA'$ , $BB'$ and $CC'$ indeed concur at $X_{57}$ which lies on line $IO$.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a