Summer is a great time to explore cool problems to keep your skills sharp!  Schedule a class today!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a June Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Jun 2, 2025
Congratulations to all the mathletes who competed at National MATHCOUNTS! If you missed the exciting Countdown Round, you can watch the video at this link. Are you interested in training for MATHCOUNTS or AMC 10 contests? How would you like to train for these math competitions in half the time? We have accelerated sections which meet twice per week instead of once starting on July 8th (7:30pm ET). These sections fill quickly so enroll today!

[list][*]MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
[*]MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
[*]AMC 10 Problem Series[/list]
For those interested in Olympiad level training in math, computer science, physics, and chemistry, be sure to enroll in our WOOT courses before August 19th to take advantage of early bird pricing!

Summer camps are starting this month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have a transformative summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]June 5th, Thursday, 7:30pm ET: Open Discussion with Ben Kornell and Andrew Sutherland, Art of Problem Solving's incoming CEO Ben Kornell and CPO Andrew Sutherland host an Ask Me Anything-style chat. Come ask your questions and get to know our incoming CEO & CPO!
[*]June 9th, Monday, 7:30pm ET, Game Jam: Operation Shuffle!, Come join us to play our second round of Operation Shuffle! If you enjoy number sense, logic, and a healthy dose of luck, this is the game for you. No specific math background is required; all are welcome.[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29
Sunday, Aug 17 - Dec 14
Tuesday, Aug 26 - Dec 16
Friday, Sep 5 - Jan 16
Monday, Sep 8 - Jan 12
Tuesday, Sep 16 - Jan 20 (4:30 - 5:45 pm ET/1:30 - 2:45 pm PT)
Sunday, Sep 21 - Jan 25
Thursday, Sep 25 - Jan 29
Wednesday, Oct 22 - Feb 25
Tuesday, Nov 4 - Mar 10
Friday, Dec 12 - Apr 10

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21
Sunday, Aug 17 - Dec 14
Tuesday, Sep 9 - Jan 13
Thursday, Sep 25 - Jan 29
Sunday, Oct 19 - Feb 22
Monday, Oct 27 - Mar 2
Wednesday, Nov 12 - Mar 18

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Sunday, Aug 17 - Dec 14
Wednesday, Aug 27 - Dec 17
Friday, Sep 5 - Jan 16
Thursday, Sep 11 - Jan 15
Sunday, Sep 28 - Feb 1
Monday, Oct 6 - Feb 9
Tuesday, Oct 21 - Feb 24
Sunday, Nov 9 - Mar 15
Friday, Dec 5 - Apr 3

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 2 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Monday, Aug 11 - Nov 3
Wednesday, Sep 3 - Nov 19
Sunday, Sep 21 - Dec 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Friday, Oct 3 - Jan 16
Tuesday, Nov 4 - Feb 10
Sunday, Dec 7 - Mar 8

Introduction to Number Theory
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Wednesday, Aug 13 - Oct 29
Friday, Sep 12 - Dec 12
Sunday, Oct 26 - Feb 1
Monday, Dec 1 - Mar 2

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Thursday, Aug 7 - Nov 20
Monday, Aug 18 - Dec 15
Sunday, Sep 7 - Jan 11
Thursday, Sep 11 - Jan 15
Wednesday, Sep 24 - Jan 28
Sunday, Oct 26 - Mar 1
Tuesday, Nov 4 - Mar 10
Monday, Dec 1 - Mar 30

Introduction to Geometry
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Wednesday, Aug 13 - Feb 11
Tuesday, Aug 26 - Feb 24
Sunday, Sep 7 - Mar 8
Thursday, Sep 11 - Mar 12
Wednesday, Sep 24 - Mar 25
Sunday, Oct 26 - Apr 26
Monday, Nov 3 - May 4
Friday, Dec 5 - May 29

Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
Friday, Aug 8 - Feb 20
Tuesday, Aug 26 - Feb 24
Sunday, Sep 28 - Mar 29
Wednesday, Oct 8 - Mar 8
Sunday, Nov 16 - May 17
Thursday, Dec 11 - Jun 4

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2
Sunday, Sep 28 - Feb 15
Tuesday, Nov 4 - Mar 24

Intermediate Number Theory
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3
Wednesday, Sep 24 - Dec 17

Precalculus
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Jan 21
Tuesday, Sep 9 - Feb 24
Sunday, Sep 21 - Mar 8
Monday, Oct 20 - Apr 6
Sunday, Dec 14 - May 31

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17
Sunday, Sep 7 - Mar 15
Wednesday, Sep 24 - Apr 1
Friday, Nov 14 - May 22

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
Sunday, Aug 17 - Nov 9
Wednesday, Sep 3 - Nov 19
Tuesday, Sep 16 - Dec 9
Sunday, Sep 21 - Dec 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Oct 6 - Jan 12
Thursday, Oct 16 - Jan 22
Tues, Thurs & Sun, Dec 9 - Jan 18 (meets three times a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
Sunday, Aug 17 - Nov 9
Tuesday, Aug 26 - Nov 11
Thursday, Sep 4 - Nov 20
Friday, Sep 12 - Dec 12
Monday, Sep 15 - Dec 8
Sunday, Oct 5 - Jan 11
Tues, Thurs & Sun, Dec 2 - Jan 11 (meets three times a week!)
Mon, Wed & Fri, Dec 8 - Jan 16 (meets three times a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
Sunday, Aug 10 - Nov 2
Thursday, Aug 14 - Oct 30
Tuesday, Aug 19 - Nov 4
Mon & Wed, Sep 15 - Oct 22 (meets twice a week!)
Mon, Wed & Fri, Oct 6 - Nov 3 (meets three times a week!)
Tue, Thurs & Sun, Oct 7 - Nov 2 (meets three times a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
Friday, Aug 15 - Sep 12
Sunday, Sep 7 - Sep 28
Tuesday, Sep 9 - Sep 30
Monday, Sep 22 - Oct 13
Sunday, Sep 28 - Oct 19 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, Oct 8 - Oct 29
Thursday, Oct 9 - Oct 30

AMC 12 Problem Series
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Sunday, Aug 10 - Nov 2
Monday, Aug 18 - Nov 10
Mon & Wed, Sep 15 - Oct 22 (meets twice a week!)
Tues, Thurs & Sun, Oct 7 - Nov 2 (meets three times a week!)

AMC 12 Final Fives
Thursday, Sep 4 - Sep 25
Sunday, Sep 28 - Oct 19
Tuesday, Oct 7 - Oct 28

AIME Problem Series A
Thursday, Oct 23 - Jan 29

AIME Problem Series B
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tuesday, Sep 2 - Nov 18

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Tuesday, Sep 16 - Dec 9
Friday, Oct 17 - Jan 30

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Thursday, Aug 14 - Oct 30
Sunday, Sep 7 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Dec 2 - Mar 3

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Friday, Oct 3 - Jan 16

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1
Wednesday, Sep 3 - Dec 3
Thursday, Oct 30 - Feb 5
Tuesday, Dec 2 - Mar 3

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tuesday, Sep 2 - Nov 18
Sunday, Oct 5 - Jan 11
Wednesday, Dec 10 - Mar 11

Physics 1: Mechanics
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15
Sunday, Sep 21 - Mar 22
Sunday, Oct 26 - Apr 26

Relativity
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Jun 2, 2025
0 replies
Bugs Bunny at it again
Rijul saini   7
N 10 minutes ago by ihatemath123
Source: LMAO 2025 Day 2 Problem 1
Bugs Bunny wants to choose a number $k$ such that every collection of $k$ consecutive positive integers contains an integer whose sum of digits is divisible by $2025$.

Find the smallest positive integer $k$ for which he can do this, or prove that none exist.

Proposed by Saikat Debnath and MV Adhitya
7 replies
+1 w
Rijul saini
Wednesday at 7:01 PM
ihatemath123
10 minutes ago
IMO ShortList 2002, number theory problem 6
orl   34
N 18 minutes ago by lksb
Source: IMO ShortList 2002, number theory problem 6
Find all pairs of positive integers $m,n\geq3$ for which there exist infinitely many positive integers $a$ such that \[ \frac{a^m+a-1}{a^n+a^2-1}  \] is itself an integer.

Laurentiu Panaitopol, Romania
34 replies
+1 w
orl
Sep 28, 2004
lksb
18 minutes ago
random combo geo
DottedCaculator   15
N 19 minutes ago by heheman
Source: USA TST 2024/4
Find all integers $n \geq 2$ for which there exists a sequence of $2n$ pairwise distinct points $(P_1, \dots, P_n, Q_1, \dots, Q_n)$ in the plane satisfying the following four conditions: [list=i] [*]no three of the $2n$ points are collinear;
[*] $P_iP_{i+1} \ge 1$ for all $i = 1, 2, \dots ,n$, where $P_{n+1}=P_1$;
[*] $Q_iQ_{i+1} \ge 1$ for all $i = 1, 2, \dots, n$, where $Q_{n+1} = Q_1$; and
[*] $P_iQ_j \le 1$ for all $i = 1, 2, \dots, n$ and $j = 1, 2, \dots, n$.[/list]

Ray Li
15 replies
DottedCaculator
Jan 15, 2024
heheman
19 minutes ago
Strange Inequality
S.Ragnork1729   21
N 20 minutes ago by heheman
Source: INMO P4
Let $n\ge 3$ be a positive integer. Find the largest real number $t_n$ as a function of $n$ such that the inequality
\[\max\left(|a_1+a_2|, |a_2+a_3|, \dots ,|a_{n-1}+a_{n}| , |a_n+a_1|\right) \ge t_n \cdot \max(|a_1|,|a_2|, \dots ,|a_n|)\]holds for all real numbers $a_1, a_2, \dots , a_n$ .

Proposed by Rohan Goyal and Rijul Saini
21 replies
S.Ragnork1729
Jan 19, 2025
heheman
20 minutes ago
No more topics!
The three lines AA', BB' and CC' meet on the line IO
WakeUp   45
N Apr 28, 2025 by Ilikeminecraft
Source: Romanian Master Of Mathematics 2012
Let $ABC$ be a triangle and let $I$ and $O$ denote its incentre and circumcentre respectively. Let $\omega_A$ be the circle through $B$ and $C$ which is tangent to the incircle of the triangle $ABC$; the circles $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ are defined similarly. The circles $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ meet at a point $A'$ distinct from $A$; the points $B'$ and $C'$ are defined similarly. Prove that the lines $AA',BB'$ and $CC'$ are concurrent at a point on the line $IO$.

(Russia) Fedor Ivlev
45 replies
WakeUp
Mar 3, 2012
Ilikeminecraft
Apr 28, 2025
The three lines AA', BB' and CC' meet on the line IO
G H J
Source: Romanian Master Of Mathematics 2012
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
yayups
1614 posts
#33 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
//cdn.artofproblemsolving.com/images/c/9/2/c92b6b5e34413a21f9b98e2add6e46d84d14e7f4.jpg
Let $DEF$ be the contact triangle of $ABC$, and let $I_AI_BI_C$ be the excentral triangle. We claim the desired point is $P$, the exsimilicenter of $(DEF)$ and $(I_AI_BI_C)$. This lies on the line joining their centers, which is the Euler line of $I_AI_BI_C$. It's well known that $O$ is on this Euler line (by incircle inversion), so $P\in OI$. It suffices now to show that $P$ has equal power with respect to the circles $\omega_A$, $\omega_B$, $\omega_C$. Note that the triangles $DEF$ and $I_AI_BI_C$ are homothetic (USAMTS Round 2 anyone?), so $P=I_AD\cap I_BE\cap I_CF$. Let the scale factor be $k$, so $PI_A/PD=PI_B/PE=PI_C/PF=k$.

The main idea to this problem is ISL 2002 G7, but we'll show the relevant pieces here without citation. We'll show that $I_AD$ passes through $X$, the tangency point of $\omega_A$ and the incircle, and that the other intersection $X'$ of $I_AD$ with $\omega_A$ is the midpoint of $I_AD$. This finishes, because then the power of $P$ with respect to $\omega_A$ is
\[PX\cdot PX' = PX\cdot PD\cdot\frac{k+1}{2} = \frac{k+1}{2}\mathrm{Pow}_{(DEF)}(P),\]which is symmetric in $A$, $B$, $C$. Now we'll show the claims.

It's well known that $M,D,I_A$ are collinear (here $M$ is the midpoint of the altitude $AU$), so to show $X,D,I_A$ collinear, it suffices to show that $X,M,D$ collinear, or that $M$ is on the polar of $T$ with respect to $\omega:=(DEF)$, or that $T$ is on the polar of $M$ with respect to $\omega$. Here $T$ is the intersection of the common tangent to $\omega$ and $\omega_A$ with $BC$. Define the projective map from line $AU$ to line $BC$ by sending $G\in AU$ to the intersection of the polar of $G$ with respect to $\omega$ with $BC$. This preserves cross ratio, so
\[-1=(AU;M\infty) = (SD;T'\infty),\]where $S=EF\cap BC$, and $T'$ is the intersection of the polar of $M$ with $BC$. It suffices to show that $T'=T$, so it suffices to show $T$ is the midpoint of $DS$. Indeed, we have
\[TD^2=TX^2=TB\cdot TC,\]so $B$ and $C$ are harmonic conjugate in $DS'$, where $S'=2D-T$. But we know $(BC;DS)=-1$, so we're done. This shows that $X,D,I_A$ collinear.

Now we'll show that $X'$ is the midpoint of $DI_A$. Note that $TD=TS=TX$, so $X$ is on the semicircle with diameter $DS$, so $\angle DXS=\pi/2$. Furthermore, we have $(BC;DS)=-1$, so we must have that $XD$ and $XS$ are the internal and external angle bisectors of $\angle BXC$. Thus, $X'$ is the arc midpoint of $BC$ in $\omega_A$, so $X'L$ is the perpendicular bisector of $BC$, where $L$ is the arc midpoint of $BC$ in $(ABC)$. Thus, $X'L\parallel DI$, and since $L$ is the midpoint of $II_A$, we see that $X'$ is the midpoint of $DI_A$.

This completes the proof as we showed how the above claims imply the problem.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
maryam2002
69 posts
#34
Y by
khina wrote:
Surprisingly, I don't think anyone has this sol yet. It's actually rather short, but yeah this problem is really cute. I do think that it is kind of ruined by 2002 ISL G7 though because this makes it more of an "extension" than a standalone problem, but this is still a pretty cool problem.

solution



Why can you use brianchon ?
would you pleas explain it more ?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
rcorreaa
238 posts
#35
Y by
Let $D,E,F$ the touching points of $\omega$ on $BC,CA,AB$ and $A_1$ be the tangency point of $\omega_A, \omega$. Define $B_1,C_1$ similarly. Furthermore, let $X=EF \cap BC$ and $M_A$ the midpoint of $XD$. $Y,Z,M_B,M_C$ are defined similarly.

By ISL 2002 G7, $A_1,D,I_A$ are collinear, where $I_A$ is the $A$-excenter of $ABC$. Therefore, $A_2=A_1A_1 \cap BC$ satisfies $A_2A_1^2=A_2B.A_2C$, but since it's well known that $(B,C;D;X)=-1$, and the midpoint $M_A$ of $XD$ also satisfies $XD^2=XB.XC$, we have that $A_2=X$. Furthermore, $X,Y,Z$ are collinear, because $XYZ$ is the radical axis of $(ABC), \omega$ (all of them have same power of point WRT $(ABC),\omega$).

Now, observe that $\Pi_{\omega}(X)=DA_1, \Pi_{\omega}(Y)=EB_1,\Pi_{\omega}(Z)=FC_1$, so since $X,Y,Z$ are collinear, $DA_1,EB_1,FC_1$ are concurrent. Let $P= DA_1 \cap EB_1 \cap FC_1$. By La Hire's Theorem, $\Pi_{\omega}(P)= \ell$, where $\ell$ is the line $XYZ$. Thus, $IP \perp \ell$. On the other hand, since $\ell$ is the radical axis of $(ABC), \omega$, we have that $OI \perp \ell$, so $O,I,P$ are collinear. By Pascal's Theorem on $EEB_1FFC_1$ and $B_1B_1EC_1C_1F$, we have that $Q_A=B_1B_1 \cap C_1C_1$ lies on $AP$. Also, by the Radical Axis Theorem on $\omega_B,\omega_C,\omega$, $Q_A$ lies on $AA'$, so $P$ lies on $AA'$. Similarly $P$ lies on $BB',CC'$, and since $P \in OI$, we are done.

$\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
GeronimoStilton
1521 posts
#36 • 4 Y
Y by centslordm, Mango247, Mango247, Mango247
Solution with help from khina :heart_eyes:

Let $\omega$ denote the incircle. The first step is to identify the concurrence point. Let $\triangle DEF$ denote the intouch triangle and $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ denote the excentral triangle of $\triangle ABC$. Since the two triangles are similar with parallel sides they have a center of homothety $T$ that lies on the line through the two circumcenters of the triangles, or $IO$. We spend the rest of the proof showing $T$ lies on $AA'$, which suffices by symmetry.

By ISL 2002 G7, the circle through $B$ and $C$ tangent to $\omega$ passes through the second intersection of $DI_A$ and $\omega$, or $U$. Define $V,W$ similarly. It is enough to show that $EV,FW,AA'$ concur. Clearly $A_1=WW\cap VV$ lies on $AA'$, so it is enough to show $AA_1,EV,FW$ concur. Now the problem ought to be true no matter what configuration $E,V,F,W$ form: take a homography sending $EV\cap FW$ to the center of $\omega$, then the result follows by symmetry, since $A=EE\cap FF$ and $A_1=VV\cap WW$.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by GeronimoStilton, May 16, 2021, 1:50 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mogmog8
1080 posts
#37 • 3 Y
Y by centslordm, megarnie, crazyeyemoody907
Let $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ and $\triangle DEF$ be the excentral and incentral triangles of $\triangle ABC,$ respectively, and let $\omega_A,\omega_B,$ and $\omega_C$ touch $\omega$ at $P,Q,$ and $R,$ respectively. Also, let $S=\overline{QQ}\cap\overline{RR},$ $T=\overline{EQ}\cap\overline{FR}$ and $U=\overline{ER}\cap\overline{FQ},$ noticing $S$ lies on $\overline{AA'}$ by Radical Axis. By ISL 2002/G7, $P,Q,$ and $R$ lie on $\overline{DI_A},\overline{EI_B},$ and $\overline{FI_C},$ and by Vietnam TST 2003/2, $T$ lies on $\overline{IO}$ and $\overline{DI_A}.$ Also, $S$ and $A$ both lie on $\overline{TU}$ by Pascal on $QQFRRE$ and $EERFFQ,$ respectively. Similarly, $T$ also lies on $\overline{BB'}$ and $\overline{CC'}.$ $\square$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Mogmog8, Jan 15, 2022, 3:46 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
crazyeyemoody907
450 posts
#38 • 1 Y
Y by Rounak_iitr
[asy]
//setup
size(13cm); 
pen blu,grn,lightblu; blu=RGB(102,153,255); grn=RGB(0,204,0); lightblu=RGB(196,216,255);
//defns
pair A,B,C,I,O,D,E,F,H; A=(-1,10); B=(0,0); C=(14,0); I=incenter(A,B,C); O=circumcenter(A,B,C); D=foot(I,B,C); E=foot(I,C,A); F=foot(I,A,B); H=D+E+F-2*I;
path w=incircle(A,B,C);

pair Ka,Kb,Kc; Ka=extension(E,F,B,C); Kb=extension(D,F,A,C); Kc=extension(D,E,A,B);
path ya,yb,yc; ya=circle((Ka+D)/2,distance(D,Ka)/2); yb=circle((Kb+E)/2,distance(E,Kb)/2); yc=circle((Kc+F)/2,distance(F,Kc)/2);
pair Ja,Jb,Jc; Ja=foot(D,Ka,2I-D); Jb=foot(E,Kb,2I-E); Jc=foot(F,Kc,2I-F); 
path wa,wb,wc; wa=circumcircle(B,C,Ja); wb=circumcircle(C,A,Jb); wc=circumcircle(A,B,Jc);

pair Ta=foot(D,E,F); pair U=2*circumcenter(I,Jb,Jc)-I; 
pair X=extension(D,Ja,E,Jb);
//draw
filldraw(D--E--F--cycle,lightblu,blu);
draw(A--B--C--A--D--E--F--D--Ka--F,blu); draw(w,blu+dashdotted);
draw(D--Ta,purple+dotted);
draw(ya,purple); draw(yb,purple); draw(yc,purple);
draw(4*I-3*H--3*H-2*I,linewidth(1));
draw(D--Ja^^E--Jb^^F--Jc,grn+linewidth(1));
draw(wb,red); draw(wc,red);
draw(Jb--U--Jc,red);
draw(A--U,magenta+linewidth(1));
clip((-7,-15)--(-7,12)--(13,12)--(15,10)--(15,-15)--cycle);


//label
label("$A$",A,dir(120)); label("$B$",B,-dir(80)); label("$C$",C,dir(-50));
label("$D$",D,dir(120)); label("$E$",E,dir(90)); label("$F$",F,dir(120)); 
label("$K_a$",Ka,-dir(20));label("$J_a$",Ja,dir(20)); 
label("$J_b$",Jb,-dir(80)); label("$J_c$",Jc,dir(70)); 
label("$U$",U,-dir(90)); label("$X$",X,dir(-90)); 
label("$\textcolor{red}{\omega_b}$",(14,1.2)); label("$\textcolor{red}{\omega_c}$",(-4,8));
label("$\textcolor[rgb]{.6,0,1}{\gamma_a}$",(-5,2.8));
label("$\textcolor[rgb]{.6,0,1}{\gamma_b}$",(6.5,10.5));
label("$\textcolor[rgb]{.6,0,1}{\gamma_c}$",(6,-4));
[/asy]
This is actually a nice config... let $K_a=\overline{EF}\cap\overline{BC}$, $\gamma_a=(K_aD)$, and cyclic variants. Let $H,\ell$ denote the orthocenter and Euler line of $\triangle DEF$, respectively.

Observe that $\overline{OI}$ is just $\ell$, and that $\gamma_a$, etc are coaxial Apollonian circles. Define $X$ as the radical center of $\gamma_a,\gamma_b,\gamma_c,\omega$ (which exists since the former 3 circles are coaxial). We'll show this is the desired concurrency point. Also, define $J_a=\omega_a\cap\gamma_a\cap\omega$ and variants. Clearly, $\overline{DJ_a}$ is the raxis of $(\gamma_a,\omega)$, i.e. $X\in\overline{DJ_a}$.

Lemma 1: $\ell$ is the raxis of $\gamma_a$ and variants.
Proof
To finish, let tangents to $\omega$ at $J_b,J_c$ meet @ $U$; then, $\overline{AU}$ is the raxis of $\omega_b,\omega_c$. Clearly this is the polar of $\overline{J_bJ_c}\cap\overline{EF}$. Recalling that $X=\overline{EJ_b}\cap\overline{FJ_c}$, follows by Brokard that $X\in\overline{AU}$, the end.

Remark: This concurrency point also appears inm Brazil 2013/6...
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by crazyeyemoody907, Nov 19, 2022, 2:02 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
5005 posts
#39 • 1 Y
Y by GeoKing
Let $DEF$ be the intouch triangle and $\omega$ be the incircle. Let $T_A$ be the intersection of the midlines of $\triangle BDF$ and $\triangle CDE$, i.e. the radical center of $B$, $C$, and $\omega$; define $T_B$ and $T_C$ similarly. Then $\omega_A$ is the circle $(BCT_A)$ by a well-known lemma. Finally, let $M_A$ be the midpoint of arc $BC$ not containing $A$, and define $M_B$ and $M_C$ similarly.

Now note that $AA'$, $BB'$, and $CC'$ concur by radical center. Invert about this point fixing $\omega_A$, $\omega_B$, and $\omega_C$. Then $\omega$ is sent to some circle internally tangent to $\omega_A,\omega_B,\omega_C$, and hence the radical center lies on the line joining $I$ with the center of this circle. Note that $\overline{T_BT_C}$, $\overline{EF}$, and $\overline{M_BM_C}$ are all parallel, and cyclic variants hold. Thus $\triangle T_AT_BT_C$ and $\triangle DEF$ are homothetic. Since $D$ is the "lowest" point in $\omega$, $T_A$ is thus the "lowest" point in $(T_AT_BT_C)$; since it's also clearly the "lowest" point in $(BCT_A)$ it follows that $(T_AT_BT_C)$ and $(BCT_A)$ are tangent. Cyclic variants hold as well, so it follows that $\omega$ gets sent to $(T_AT_BT_C)$. Further, note that $\triangle T_AT_BT_C$ and $\triangle M_AM_BM_C$ are homothetic. Since $\overline{T_AM_A}$ is the perpendicular bisector of $\overline{BC}$ and similar statements hold, it follows that $O$ is the center of homothety; hence $O$ is also the center of $(T_AT_BT_C)$, which finishes. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AdventuringHobbit
164 posts
#40
Y by
Let the tangency points of the circles be $T_A$, $T_B$, and $T_C$. Let $P$ be the radical center. Let $DEF$ by the intouch triangle of $ABC$. Then we know that the intersections of the tangents at $T_B$ and $T_C$ to the incircle are on AA' by radax. Also the intersection of the tangents at $E$ and $F$ are on the radax. Then in follows that $FT_C \cap ET_B$ is on $AA'$ since it is known that quadrilaterals with incircles have the same intersection of diagonals as their tangential quadrilateral. Now let $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ be the poles of $DT_A$, $ET_B$, $FT_C$. Observe that since $XT_A^2=XB \cdot XC$ that $X$ is on the radical axis of $(ABC)$ and $(DEF)$. So $XYZ$ is a line that is exactly the radax of $(ABC)$ and $(DEF)$. Then the pole of $XYZ$ must be on $T_AD$, $T_BE$, and $T_CF$. Thus the pole of $XYZ$ is $P$ from the concurrences from earlier. Since $XYZ \perp OI$, it follows that $P$ is on $OI$, so we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
DottedCaculator
7357 posts
#41
Y by
https://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/texer/a/atxwdqpk.png?time=1708984849006

Let $DEF$ be the intouch triangle, let $I_A$, $I_B$, and $I_C$ be the excenters. Let $A_1$ be the foot from $I$ to $DI_A$, let $A_2$ be the reflection of $D$ over $A_1$, and let $M_A$ be the midpoint of $DI_A$. Since $BCA_1II_A$ is cyclic, $DB\cdot DC=DA_1\cdot DI_A=DA_2\cdot DM_A$, which implies $BCA_2M_A$ is cyclic. Since $A_2$ lies on the incircle and $DM_A$, the homothety centered at $A_2$ mapping $D$ to $M_A$ must map the incircle to the circumcircle of $BCA_2M_A$, so $A_2$ lies on $\omega_A$.

Therefore, since $DEF$ and $I_AI_BI_C$ are homothetic, the triangle formed by the midpoints of $DI_A$, $EI_B$, and $FI_C$, which is $M_AM_BM_C$ is homothetic to $DEF$. Let $X$ be the center of homothety of those triangles. $\operatorname{Pow}_{\omega_A}(X)=XA_2\cdot XM_A=\operatorname{Pow}_{(DEF)}(X)\frac{XM_A}{XD}$, so since $\frac{XM_A}{XD}$ is the ratio of homothety from $M_AM_BM_C$ to $DEF$, $X$ is the point of concurrency of $AA'$, $BB'$, and $CC'$, which lies on $IO$.
This post has been edited 7 times. Last edited by DottedCaculator, Feb 26, 2024, 10:02 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Akacool
14 posts
#42 • 1 Y
Y by Mutse
Let $DEF$ be the contact triangle of $ABC$, and let $I_AI_BI_C$ be the excentral triangle. We claim the desired point is $P$, the exsimilicenter of $(DEF)$ and $(I_AI_BI_C)$.
We claim that the intersection of $\omega_A$ and the incircle lies on the line $I_AD$.
Lets take base of altitude of $A$ as $D$ and the midpoint of $AD$ as $M$, intersection of $EF$ and $BC$ as $Y$, antipode of $D$ wrt incircle as $Z$, the intersection of incircle and $I_AD$ as $K$.
We can easily see that by taking a pencil on $D$ that $LDKZ$ is a harmonic quadrilateral. Which implies that $Y$, $L$ and $Z$ are collinear. Because $(Y, D; B, C) = -1$ and take $X$ as midpoint of segment $YD$ it becomes clear that $XD^2 = XB \cdot XC$ it further implies that $XK$ is tangent to $\omega_A$ which proves the claim.
Then we can further assume that midpoint of $I_AD$ lies on $\omega_A$. This comes from that $KI_A$ is angle bisector of $\angle BKC$ and midpoint of $KI_A$ lying on the perpendicular bisector of $BC$.
Now finally we just have to prove that power of point of $P$ wrt to the three circles are equal. If we take the midpoints of $I_AD$, $I_BE$ and $I_CF$ as $V$, $U$ and $W$.
Which is same as proving $T_AP \cdot PV=T_BP \cdot PU$ which comes from the fact that triangles $(DEF)$ and $(I_AI_BI_C)$ are homothetic. $T_AT_BDE$ is cyclic and
$DE$ and $UV$ being parallel implies the result. Now the homothety form $P$ takes circumcenter of $(I_AI_BI_C)$ to $I$ so it means that $P$ lies on the Euler line of triangle $(I_AI_BI_C)$ which is indeed $OI$ proving the result.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Akacool, Apr 26, 2024, 2:40 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mcmp
53 posts
#43
Y by
Nvm this solution has been posted before. Why is this question so projective however.

First I claim that if $\omega_a$ is tangent to incircle $\omega=(DEF)$ at $T_a$ and other cyclic definitions then $T_aD$, $T_bE$, $T_cF$ concur on $OI$. Let the tangents at $T_a$ and $D$ of $\omega$ concur at $S_a$. Takes the polar dual of this entire configuration. I claim that the poles of $T_aD$, $T_bE$ and $T_cF$, which are $S_a$, $S_b$ and $S_c$ respectively, are collinear. Note however $S_aT_a^2=S_aB\cdot S_aC$, and hence $S_a$s power to both $\omega$ and $\Omega=(ABC)$ are the same. Hence $S_a$, $S_b$, $S_c$ lie on the radical axis of $\Omega$ and $\omega$. Hence we are done as then $\overline{S_aS_bS_c}$s pole, $S$, is a point on $OI$.

Now consider $A_1$ as the intersection of the tangent to $T_b$ and $T_c$ to $\omega$; I claim that $A_1$ lies on $AA_1$, which is just the radical axis of $\omega_b$ and $\omega_c$. However this follows from radical axis from $\omega$, $\omega_b$ and $\omega_c$. However $AA_1$ also passes through $S$ by Brianchon on the degenerate hexagon $AFXA’T_cYE$ and $AXT_bA’YE$ ($X=\overline{AF}\cap\overline{A’T_b}$ and $Y=\overline{AE}\cap\overline{A’T_c}$). Thus we are done (surprisingly quickly!)
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by mcmp, Nov 22, 2024, 4:35 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
hectorleo123
347 posts
#44
Y by
Let $Q$ and $R$ be the points of tangency of $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ with the incircle, let $I_B$ and $I_C$ be the $B-$excenter and the $C-$excenter respectively, let $E$ and $F$ be the points of tangency of the incircle with $AC$ and $AB$ respectively.
By 2002 ISL G7 we know that $I_B, E, Q$ and $I_C, F, R$ are collinear
We also know that $X_{57}$ is the homothetic center of the intouch triangle and the excentral triangle$\Rightarrow X_{57}\equiv I_BE\cap I_CF$
Let $Y$ be the midpoint of $I_BE$ and $Z$ the midpoint of $I_CF$, we know that $QE$ passes through the midpoint of arc $AC$ in $\omega_B\Rightarrow Y\in \omega_B$, analogously $Z\in\omega_C$, and $EF//I_BI_C$(trivial)
$\Rightarrow \frac{X_{57}Y}{X_{57}E}=\frac{X_{57}Z}{X_{57}F}$ and we know $X_{57}E.X_{57}Q=X_{57}F.X_{57}R$
$\Rightarrow X_{57}Y.X_{57}Q=X_{57}Z.X_{57}R \Rightarrow X_{57}$ is on the radical axis of $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C \Rightarrow A,X_{57},A'$ are colinear $\Rightarrow AA',BB'$ and $CC'$ are concurrent in $X_{57}$ which, being the center of homothecy of the contact triangle and the excentral triangle is on the Euler line of $I_AI_BI_C$ which is the line $IO_\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cursed_tangent1434
662 posts
#45
Y by
Falls apart after 2002 G7 so most proofs of claims will be borrowed from this problem. Let $\triangle DEF$ be the intouch triangle and $\triangle I_aI_bI_c$ the excentral triangle. Let $P$ , $Q$ and $R$ denote the tangency points of $\omega_A$ , $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$ with the incircle respectively. Let $L$ , $M$ and $N$ denote the midpoints of segments $DI_a$ , $EI_b$ and $FI_c$ respectively.

From these solutions to Shortlist 2002 G7 we already know that points $P$ , $D$ and $I_a$ (and similarly) are collinear and point $P$ lies on $(BFI_a)$ and $(CEI_a)$ (and similarly) and also from Fake USAMO 2020/3 we know that circles $(AEI_b)$ and $(AFI_c)$ intersect at the $A-$Evan is Old Point $E_{Oa}$ which lies on $(ABC)$. Since $\triangle DEF$ and $\triangle I_aI_bI_c$ are clearly homothetic, lines $DI_a$ , $EI_b$ and $FI_c$ concur at the point $X_{57}$ which must lie on $\overline{IO}$. Also by the Midpoint theorem, $\triangle LMN$ is also homothetic to these two triangles. Thus, we only need to show the following claim.

Claim : Point $X_{57}$ lies on the pairwise radical axes of circles $\omega_A$ , $\omega_B$ and $\omega_C$.

Proof : This is a simple length calculation. Note,
\[X_{57}P \cdot X_{57}L=\frac{X_{57}P \cdot X_{57}I_a \cdot X_{57}L}{X_{57}I_a} = \frac{X_{57}B\cdot X_{57}E_{Ob}\cdot X_{57}L}{X_{57}I_a} = \frac{X_{57}B \cdot X_{57}E_{Ob}\cdot X_{57}N}{X_{57}I_c} = \frac{X_{57}R \cdot X_{57}I_c \cdot X_{57}N}{X_{57}I_c}= X_{57}R \cdot X_{57}N\]which implies that $X_{57}$ lies on the radical axis of circles $\omega_A$ and $\omega_C$. Thus $\overline{BX_{57}}$ is the Radical Axis of circles $\omega_A$ and $\omega_C$. A similar argument shows that $\overline{AX_{57}}$ and $\overline{CX_{57}}$ are the other two pairwise Radical Axes. Thus, these lines $AA'$ , $BB'$ and $CC'$ indeed concur at $X_{57}$ which lies on line $IO$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ihategeo_1969
247 posts
#46
Y by
We will define some new points.

$\bullet$ Let $\triangle DEF$ and $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ be the intouch and excentral triangle of $\triangle ABC$. Let $T$ be their homothetic center which is known to exist and to be on $\overline{OI}$.
$\bullet$ Let $D'$ be midpoint of $\overline{DI_A}$. Define $E'$ and $F'$ similarly.
$\bullet$ Let $X$ be tangency point of $\omega_A$ and $\omega$ (the incircle). Define $Y$ and $Z$ similarly.

From IMO Shortlist 2002/G7, we have $X=\overline{DI_A} \cap \omega$ and analogous. Obviously $T=\overline{DI_A} \cap \overline{EI_B} \cap \overline{FI_C}$ and we will prove that $T$ is the radical center of $\omega_A$, $\omega_B$, $\omega_C$ and we will be done.

Claim: $D'$ lies on $\omega_A$ and analogous.
Proof: First see that $D$ lies on $\perp$ bisector of $\overline{BC}$. This is because if we let $M_A$ be the minor arc midpoint of $\widehat{BC}$ then $\overline{D'M_A}$ is $I_A$-midline of $\triangle I_ADI$ and so $\overline{D'M_A} \parallel \overline{ID} \parallel \overline{BC}$ and $M_A$ lies on $\perp$ bisector of $\overline{BC}$ obviously.

Let $D''=\overline{XD} \cap (BXC)$. Then by circles in segment lemma, $D''$ lies of $\perp$ bisector of $\overline{BC}$ and so $D' \equiv D''$ as required. $\square$

Now to finish see that $\triangle D'E'F'$ is also homothetic to $\triangle DEF$ with dilation point $T$ with say factor $\lambda$; and hence \[\text{Pow}(T,\omega_A)=TX \cdot TD'=\frac{\text{Pow}(T,\omega)}{TD} \cdot TD'=\lambda\text{Pow}(T,\omega)\]Which is symmetric in $A$, $B$, $C$ and so done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ilikeminecraft
685 posts
#47
Y by
We begin by (re)naming a bunch of points
Let $A_0B_0C_0$ be the orthic triangle.
Let $M_A$ be the midpoint of $A_0, A.$ Define $M_B, M_C$ similarly.
Let $A_1B_1C_1$ be the intouch triangle.
Let $A_2$ denote the second intersection of $A_1, M_A$ with the incircle. 2002 ISLG 7 implies $A_2$ is the tangency of $\omega_a$ with the incircle.
Define $B_2, C_2$ similarly.
Let $A_3$ be the second intersection of $A_2A_1$ with $\omega_a.$ By curvilinear properties, $A_3$ is the midpoint of arc $BC.$ Define $B_3, C_3$ similarly.
Let $S_A$ denote the midpoint of arc $BC$ in $(ABC).$ Let $I_A$ denote the $A$-excenter. By 2002 ISLG 7, it follows $M_A, A_1, A_3, I_A$ are collinear.
Claim: $A_3, B_3, C_3$ have circumcenter $O$
Proof: Take a half homothety centered at $I_A.$ This moves $I\to S_A, A_1\to A_3.$ Thus, $S_AA_3 = \frac r2,$ which is fixed. Thus, $OA_3 = OB_3 = OC_3 = R + \frac r2.$

Note that $DEF, I_AI_BI_C$ are homothetic, but since $A_3B_3C_3$ is the midpoint of respective sides, it follows $DEF$ is homothetic with $A_3B_3C_3.$ Define $X$ to be the homothetic center of these two triangles. Clearly, $X, I, O$ are collinear due to them being the circumcenters of homothetic triangles.
To conclude, note that $XA_2 \cdot XA_3 = XA_2 \cdot XA_1 \cdot \frac{XA_3}{XA_1} = XB_2\cdot XB_1\cdot\frac{XB_3}{XB_1} = XB_2\cdot XB_3$ where the third equality follows from radax on the incircle as well as similar triangles. This implies $X$ lies on the radax of $\omega_a, \omega_b.$ Similar reasoning finishes.
[asy]
 /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(20cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = -34.128562547230814, xmax = -33.7156893742517, ymin = 19.12634717117665, ymax = 19.392205802817784;  /* image dimensions */
pen qqwuqq = rgb(0.,0.39215686274509803,0.); 
 /* draw figures */
draw((-33.99542206497033,19.372194488920712)--(-34.0157465650437,19.21131306337113), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw((-34.0157465650437,19.21131306337113)--(-33.899933279891364,19.21147970119149), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw((-33.899933279891364,19.21147970119149)--(-33.99542206497033,19.372194488920712), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw((-34.0157465650437,19.21131306337113)--(-33.93007693077612,19.262213726651428), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw((-34.01390652114751,19.225878188414985)--(-33.899933279891364,19.21147970119149), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw((-33.99519062346147,19.211342640265507)--(-33.99542206497033,19.372194488920712), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw(circle((-33.97028853488444,19.251447756088847), 0.04006924400270111), linewidth(1.6) + qqwuqq); 
draw(circle((-33.95794688542274,19.285735636153856), 0.09423121724717709), linewidth(1.6) + qqwuqq); 
draw((-33.99302163837077,19.284443972856955)--(-33.970230881355626,19.211378553563502), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw(circle((-33.95787161844142,19.233425084141693), 0.06195523308627049), linewidth(2.) + red); 
draw((-33.970230881355626,19.211378553563502)--(-33.957782474314826,19.171469915186503), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw(circle((-33.989224126025825,19.28968695792242), 0.08273999709084916), linewidth(2.) + red); 
draw(circle((-33.94039854835216,19.296161990882638), 0.09385375932236227), linewidth(2.) + red); 
draw(circle((-33.95794688541734,19.285735636152406), 0.11426583924719697), linewidth(0.8)); 
draw((-33.97028853488444,19.251447756088847)--(-33.970230881355626,19.211378553563502), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw((-33.957782474314826,19.171469915186503)--(-33.95794688542274,19.285735636153856), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw((-34.01004180711605,19.25646987335085)--(-33.970230881355626,19.211378553563502), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw((-33.957782474314826,19.171469915186503)--(-34.0713116650005,19.30005725508772), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw((-33.97370246983214,19.208415897221002)--(-33.99542206497033,19.372194488920712), linewidth(1.2)); 
draw((-34.0157465650437,19.21131306337113)--(-33.90861950297203,19.271010720071242), linewidth(1.2)); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((-33.99542206497033,19.372194488920712),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$A$", (-33.99416602041885,19.374012386524463), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-34.0157465650437,19.21131306337113),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$B$", (-34.01470697429841,19.213206061867353), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.899933279891364,19.21147970119149),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$C$", (-33.89909074817633,19.207043775703486), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.99519062346147,19.211342640265507),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$A_0$", (-33.993872578220575,19.213206061867353), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-34.01390652114751,19.225878188414985),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$C_0$", (-34.01265287891045,19.227584729583043), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.93007693077612,19.262213726651428),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$B_0$", (-33.92902185240083,19.263971562169687), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.970230881355626,19.211378553563502),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$A_1$", (-33.96892999136683,19.213206061867353), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.93584086455884,19.271914859550005),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$B_1$", (-33.93459725416813,19.27365515471291), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-34.01004180711605,19.25646987335085),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$C_1$", (-34.00883813033282,19.2581027182041), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.99302163837077,19.284443972856955),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$A_2$", (-33.99181848283262,19.28627316923892), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.99255645264143,19.2181358339922),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$B_2$", (-33.991525040634336,19.21995523242778), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.952507390487185,19.215539884817822),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$C_2$", (-33.95132345947006,19.217314252643263), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.97028853488444,19.251447756088847),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$I$", (-33.969223433565105,19.253114200833352), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.95794688542274,19.285735636153856),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$O$", (-33.95689886123737,19.28744693803204), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.957782474314826,19.171469915186503),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$A_3$", (-33.95660541903909,19.173297922901355), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.85971214059534,19.3441018672165),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$B_3$", (-33.858595724813775,19.34584193548964), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-34.0713116650005,19.30005725508772),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$C_3$", (-34.07016754977322,19.30182560574773), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.97370246983214,19.208415897221002),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$E$", (-33.972451297746176,19.210271639884557), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.90861950297203,19.271010720071242),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F$", (-33.90730712972815,19.27277482811807), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.97695353833343,19.232930876307307),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$X$", (-33.98008079490144,19.225824076393366), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((-33.945334067274025,19.131561276809503),linewidth(3.pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$I_A$", (-33.94428084671136,19.133389783935357), NE * labelscalefactor); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */
[/asy]
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by Ilikeminecraft, Apr 28, 2025, 4:04 AM
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a