Plan ahead for the next school year. Schedule your class today!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a July Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jwelsh   0
Jul 1, 2025
We are halfway through summer, so be sure to carve out some time to keep your skills sharp and explore challenging topics at AoPS Online and our AoPS Academies (including the Virtual Campus)!

[list][*]Over 60 summer classes are starting at the Virtual Campus on July 7th - check out the math and language arts options for middle through high school levels.
[*]At AoPS Online, we have accelerated sections where you can complete a course in half the time by meeting twice/week instead of once/week, starting on July 8th:
[list][*]MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
[*]MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
[*]AMC Problem Series[/list]
[*]Plus, AoPS Online has a special seminar July 14 - 17 that is outside the standard fare: Paradoxes and Infinity
[*]We are expanding our in-person AoPS Academy locations - are you looking for a strong community of problem solvers, exemplary instruction, and math and language arts options? Look to see if we have a location near you and enroll in summer camps or academic year classes today! New locations include campuses in California, Georgia, New York, Illinois, and Oregon and more coming soon![/list]

MOP (Math Olympiad Summer Program) just ended and the IMO (International Mathematical Olympiad) is right around the corner! This year’s IMO will be held in Australia, July 10th - 20th. Congratulations to all the MOP students for reaching this incredible level and best of luck to all selected to represent their countries at this year’s IMO! Did you know that, in the last 10 years, 59 USA International Math Olympiad team members have medaled and have taken over 360 AoPS Online courses. Take advantage of our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training (WOOT) courses
and train with the best! Please note that early bird pricing ends August 19th!
Are you tired of the heat and thinking about Fall? You can plan your Fall schedule now with classes at either AoPS Online, AoPS Academy Virtual Campus, or one of our AoPS Academies around the US.

Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes start 7:30pm ET/4:30pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29
Sunday, Aug 17 - Dec 14
Tuesday, Aug 26 - Dec 16
Friday, Sep 5 - Jan 16
Monday, Sep 8 - Jan 12
Tuesday, Sep 16 - Jan 20 (4:30 - 5:45 pm ET/1:30 - 2:45 pm PT)
Sunday, Sep 21 - Jan 25
Thursday, Sep 25 - Jan 29
Wednesday, Oct 22 - Feb 25
Tuesday, Nov 4 - Mar 10
Friday, Dec 12 - Apr 10

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21
Sunday, Aug 17 - Dec 14
Tuesday, Sep 9 - Jan 13
Thursday, Sep 25 - Jan 29
Sunday, Oct 19 - Feb 22
Monday, Oct 27 - Mar 2
Wednesday, Nov 12 - Mar 18

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Sunday, Aug 17 - Dec 14
Wednesday, Aug 27 - Dec 17
Friday, Sep 5 - Jan 16
Thursday, Sep 11 - Jan 15
Sunday, Sep 28 - Feb 1
Monday, Oct 6 - Feb 9
Tuesday, Oct 21 - Feb 24
Sunday, Nov 9 - Mar 15
Friday, Dec 5 - Apr 3

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Jul 2 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Monday, Aug 11 - Nov 3
Wednesday, Sep 3 - Nov 19
Sunday, Sep 21 - Dec 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Friday, Oct 3 - Jan 16
Sunday, Oct 19 - Jan 25
Tuesday, Nov 4 - Feb 10
Sunday, Dec 7 - Mar 8

Introduction to Number Theory
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Wednesday, Aug 13 - Oct 29
Friday, Sep 12 - Dec 12
Sunday, Oct 26 - Feb 1
Monday, Dec 1 - Mar 2

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Thursday, Aug 7 - Nov 20
Monday, Aug 18 - Dec 15
Sunday, Sep 7 - Jan 11
Thursday, Sep 11 - Jan 15
Wednesday, Sep 24 - Jan 28
Sunday, Oct 26 - Mar 1
Tuesday, Nov 4 - Mar 10
Monday, Dec 1 - Mar 30

Introduction to Geometry
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Wednesday, Aug 13 - Feb 11
Tuesday, Aug 26 - Feb 24
Sunday, Sep 7 - Mar 8
Thursday, Sep 11 - Mar 12
Wednesday, Sep 24 - Mar 25
Sunday, Oct 26 - Apr 26
Monday, Nov 3 - May 4
Friday, Dec 5 - May 29

Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)
Sat & Sun, Sep 13 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 4:00 PM PT/4:00 - 7:00 PM ET)

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
Friday, Aug 8 - Feb 20
Tuesday, Aug 26 - Feb 24
Sunday, Sep 28 - Mar 29
Wednesday, Oct 8 - Mar 8
Sunday, Nov 16 - May 17
Thursday, Dec 11 - Jun 4

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Sunday, Sep 28 - Feb 15
Tuesday, Nov 4 - Mar 24

Intermediate Number Theory
Wednesday, Sep 24 - Dec 17

Precalculus
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Jan 21
Tuesday, Sep 9 - Feb 24
Sunday, Sep 21 - Mar 8
Monday, Oct 20 - Apr 6
Sunday, Dec 14 - May 31

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Calculus
Sunday, Sep 7 - Mar 15
Wednesday, Sep 24 - Apr 1
Friday, Nov 14 - May 22

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
Sunday, Aug 17 - Nov 9
Wednesday, Sep 3 - Nov 19
Tuesday, Sep 16 - Dec 9
Sunday, Sep 21 - Dec 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Oct 6 - Jan 12
Thursday, Oct 16 - Jan 22
Tues, Thurs & Sun, Dec 9 - Jan 18 (meets three times a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
Sunday, Aug 17 - Nov 9
Tuesday, Aug 26 - Nov 11
Thursday, Sep 4 - Nov 20
Friday, Sep 12 - Dec 12
Monday, Sep 15 - Dec 8
Sunday, Oct 5 - Jan 11
Tues, Thurs & Sun, Dec 2 - Jan 11 (meets three times a week!)
Mon, Wed & Fri, Dec 8 - Jan 16 (meets three times a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
Sunday, Aug 10 - Nov 2
Thursday, Aug 14 - Oct 30
Tuesday, Aug 19 - Nov 4
Mon & Wed, Sep 15 - Oct 22 (meets twice a week!)
Mon, Wed & Fri, Oct 6 - Nov 3 (meets three times a week!)
Tue, Thurs & Sun, Oct 7 - Nov 2 (meets three times a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Friday, Aug 15 - Sep 12
Sunday, Sep 7 - Sep 28
Tuesday, Sep 9 - Sep 30
Monday, Sep 22 - Oct 13
Sunday, Sep 28 - Oct 19 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, Oct 8 - Oct 29
Thursday, Oct 9 - Oct 30

AMC 12 Problem Series
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Sunday, Aug 10 - Nov 2
Monday, Aug 18 - Nov 10
Mon & Wed, Sep 15 - Oct 22 (meets twice a week!)
Tues, Thurs & Sun, Oct 7 - Nov 2 (meets three times a week!)

AMC 12 Final Fives
Thursday, Sep 4 - Sep 25
Sunday, Sep 28 - Oct 19
Tuesday, Oct 7 - Oct 28

AIME Problem Series A
Thursday, Oct 23 - Jan 29

AIME Problem Series B
Tuesday, Sep 2 - Nov 18

F=ma Problem Series
Tuesday, Sep 16 - Dec 9
Friday, Oct 17 - Jan 30

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT


Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, Aug 14 - Oct 30
Sunday, Sep 7 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Dec 2 - Mar 3

Intermediate Programming with Python
Friday, Oct 3 - Jan 16

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Wednesday, Sep 3 - Dec 3
Thursday, Oct 30 - Feb 5
Tuesday, Dec 2 - Mar 3

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Tuesday, Sep 2 - Nov 18
Sunday, Oct 5 - Jan 11
Wednesday, Dec 10 - Mar 11

Physics 1: Mechanics
Sunday, Sep 21 - Mar 22
Sunday, Oct 26 - Apr 26
0 replies
jwelsh
Jul 1, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
Purely projective statement
ChimkinGang   6
N 17 minutes ago by axolotlx7
Source: Own
Let $ABCD$ be a quadrilateral with $S=AD\cap BC$, $T=AB\cap CD$, and $X=AC\cap BD$. Let $P$ be a point in the plane not on $TX$, $Q=BP\cap TX$, $R=SP\cap TX$, and $Q'$ be the point on $TX$ such that $(QQ';TX)=-1$. If $U=BD\cap PQ'$ and $V=AP\cap DR$, show that $U$, $V$, and $T$ are collinear.
6 replies
ChimkinGang
Jun 15, 2025
axolotlx7
17 minutes ago
Rhombus EVAN
62861   72
N 30 minutes ago by fearsum_fyz
Source: USA January TST for IMO 2017, Problem 2
Let $ABC$ be a triangle with altitude $\overline{AE}$. The $A$-excircle touches $\overline{BC}$ at $D$, and intersects the circumcircle at two points $F$ and $G$. Prove that one can select points $V$ and $N$ on lines $DG$ and $DF$ such that quadrilateral $EVAN$ is a rhombus.

Danielle Wang and Evan Chen
72 replies
62861
Feb 23, 2017
fearsum_fyz
30 minutes ago
Probablity problem
AlanLG   1
N an hour ago by AlexCenteno2007
Source: Mathematics Regional Olympiad of Mexico Southeast 2019 P3
Eight teams are competing in a tournament all against all (every pair of team play exactly one time among them). There are not ties and both results of every game are equally probable. What is the probability that in the tournament every team had lose at least one game and won at least one game?
1 reply
AlanLG
Oct 23, 2021
AlexCenteno2007
an hour ago
Four variables (5)
Nguyenhuyen_AG   1
N an hour ago by arqady
Let $a,\,b,\,c,\,d$ be non-negative real numbers, such that $a+b+c+d=4.$ Prove that
\[52  + 17(\sqrt a + \sqrt b + \sqrt c + \sqrt d)^2\geqslant 9(ab+ bc + ca + da  + db + dc)^2.\]hide
1 reply
Nguyenhuyen_AG
2 hours ago
arqady
an hour ago
N-M where M,N two 5-digit ''consecutive'' palindromes
parmenides51   1
N an hour ago by AlexCenteno2007
Source: Mathematics Regional Olympiad of Mexico Center Zone 2018 P1
Let $M$ and $N$ be two positive five-digit palindrome integers, such that $M <N$ and there is no other palindrome number between them. Determine the possible values of $N-M$.
1 reply
parmenides51
Nov 13, 2021
AlexCenteno2007
an hour ago
Finding the minimal number of coins to pay without change
nAalniaOMliO   2
N an hour ago by nAalniaOMliO
Source: Belarusian-Iranian Friendly Competition 2025
In the magic land there are coins of all integer denominations from $1$ to $100$. Vlad has $n \geq 3$ coins, the sum of denominations of which is $200$. Find the minimal possible value of $n$ at which we can confidently say that Vlad is able to pay $100$ without change.
2 replies
nAalniaOMliO
Jun 14, 2025
nAalniaOMliO
an hour ago
Peru Ibero TST 2022
diegoca1   1
N 2 hours ago by grupyorum
Source: Peru Ibero TST 2022 D2 P1
For every positive integer $m > 1$, let $p(m)$ be the largest prime number that divides $m$. For $m = 1$, define $p(1) = 1$.

a) Prove that there exists a positive integer $n$ such that the numbers $p(n - 2022)$, $p(n)$, and $p(n + 2022)$ are all less than $\frac{\sqrt{n}}{20}$.

b) Given a positive integer $N$, prove that there exists a positive integer $n$ such that the numbers $p(n - 2022)$, $p(n)$, and $p(n + 2022)$ are all less than $\frac{\sqrt{n}}{N}$.
1 reply
diegoca1
Today at 5:00 AM
grupyorum
2 hours ago
Equivalence between sides - Portuguese MO, Problem 2, 2008
Joao Pedro Santos   4
N 2 hours ago by Fly_into_the_sky
Let $AEBC$ be a cyclic quadrilateral. Let $D$ be a point on the ray $AE$ which is outside the circumscribed circumference of $AEBC$. Suppose that $\angle CAB=\angle BAE$. Prove that $AB=BD$ if and only if $DE=AC$.
4 replies
Joao Pedro Santos
Aug 31, 2010
Fly_into_the_sky
2 hours ago
Equality sums on many variables
Assassino9931   0
2 hours ago
Source: Bulgaria Regional Round 2020 Grade 10
Fix a positive integer $k$. Determine all $k$-tuples $(a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_k)$ of real numbers which satisfy the equality
\[ b_1^2 + b_2^2 + \cdots + b_k^2 = 4\left(a_1^2 + a_2^2 + \cdots +a_k^2\right)\]where $b_n = \frac{a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_n}{n}$ for $n=1,2,\ldots,k$.
0 replies
Assassino9931
2 hours ago
0 replies
Symmetric inequality
nexu   12
N 3 hours ago by nexu
Source: own
Let $x,y,z \ge 0$. Prove that:
$$  \sum_{\mathrm{cyc}}{\left( y-z \right) ^2\left( 7x^2-y^2-z^2 \right) ^2}\ge 112\left( x-y \right) ^2\left( y-z \right) ^2\left( z-x \right) ^2. $$
12 replies
nexu
Feb 12, 2023
nexu
3 hours ago
interesting problem
Giahuytls2326   2
N 3 hours ago by Pal702004
Source: my teacher
Find all pairs of positive integers \((m, n)\) with \(m, n > 1\) such that \(m \mid a^n - 1\) for every \(a \in \{1, 2, \ldots, n\}\).
2 replies
Giahuytls2326
5 hours ago
Pal702004
3 hours ago
Perpendicular lines due to circle
Kezer   4
N 3 hours ago by Fly_into_the_sky
Source: Germany 2016 - BWM Round 1, #3
Let $A,B,C$ and $D$ be points on a circle in this order. The chords $AC$ and $BD$ intersect in point $P$. The perpendicular to $AC$ through C and the perpendicular to $BD$ through $D$ intersect in point $Q$.
Prove that the lines $AB$ and $PQ$ are perpendicular.
4 replies
Kezer
Nov 12, 2016
Fly_into_the_sky
3 hours ago
SAMO 2013 Senior Round 3 Problem 3 - Tangent to Circumcircle
DylanN   8
N 3 hours ago by TigerOnion
Let ABC be an acute-angled triangle and AD one of its altitudes (D on BC). The line through D parallel to AB is denoted by $l$, and t is the tangent to the circumcircle of ABC at A. Finally, let E be the intersection of $l$ and t. Show that CE and t are perpendicular to each other.
8 replies
DylanN
Sep 17, 2013
TigerOnion
3 hours ago
Four variables (4)
Nguyenhuyen_AG   1
N 3 hours ago by arqady
Let $a,\,b,\,c,\,d$ be non-negative real numbers. Prove that
\[\frac{3(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2)}{ab + bc + ca + da + db + dc} + \frac{256abcd}{(a + b + c + d)^4} \geqslant  3.\]
1 reply
Nguyenhuyen_AG
5 hours ago
arqady
3 hours ago
Problem 5 (Second Day)
darij grinberg   79
N Jul 16, 2025 by LHE96
Source: IMO 2004 Athens
In a convex quadrilateral $ABCD$, the diagonal $BD$ bisects neither the angle $ABC$ nor the angle $CDA$. The point $P$ lies inside $ABCD$ and satisfies \[\angle PBC=\angle DBA\quad\text{and}\quad \angle PDC=\angle BDA.\] Prove that $ABCD$ is a cyclic quadrilateral if and only if $AP=CP$.
79 replies
darij grinberg
Jul 13, 2004
LHE96
Jul 16, 2025
Problem 5 (Second Day)
G H J
Source: IMO 2004 Athens
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
BVKRB-
320 posts
#70
Y by
Really good problem! This is probably one of the shorter solutions in this thread (I also notice that @above @2above have done similar (almost same) stuff). Also I found this solution really fast as I didn't want to use tools like protractors to construct isogonal conjugates and instead used isosceles trapezoid which miraculously lead to a clean solution.

(i) Assume $ABCD$ is cyclic and $\odot(ABCD) = \Omega$
Let $BP \cap \Omega = X$ and $DP \cap \Omega = Y$
Notice that $ADXC$ and $ABYC$ are both isosceles trapezoids and therefore $$\widehat{BD} = \widehat{AD}+\widehat{AB}=\widehat{CX}+\widehat{CY}= \widehat{XY} \implies \angle XDY = \angle BXD \implies PD=PX \implies \triangle APD \cong \triangle CPX \implies AP = CP \ \blacksquare$$(ii) Assume $AP=CP$
Let $X$ be a point such that $ADXC$ is an isosceles trapezoid and let $XP \cap \odot(ADC) = B'$, this immediately gives us that $\angle PBC=\angle DBA$
It is obvious that $\triangle APD \cong \triangle CPX$ which implies $$\angle ADP = \angle CXP = \angle CXB' = \angle CDB' \implies \angle ADB = \angle CDP \implies B=B' \implies B \in \odot(ADC) \ \blacksquare$$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
CyclicISLscelesTrapezoid
376 posts
#71 • 2 Y
Y by megarnie, ike.chen
Notice that $A$ and $C$ are isogonal conjugates with respect to $\triangle BDP$, so the external angle bisector of $\angle BPD$ bisects $\angle APC$.

Only if direction: Let $O$ be the circumcenter of $ABCD$. By angle chasing, $BPOD$ is cyclic. Since $OB=OD$, the external angle bisector of $\angle BPD$ passes through $O$. Since $OA=OC$ and $O$ lies on the angle bisector of $\angle APC$, either $PA=PC$ or $OAPC$ is cyclic. However, the latter is absurd because $P$ would have to be the intersection of the circumcircles of $AOC$ and $BOD$, which is outside of the circumcircle of $ABCD$ (and thus outside of $ABCD$).

If direction: Fix point $A$. Notice that the function taking points $A'$ on $\overline{AB}$ to the corresponding point $P$ is injective, so we must have $A$ such that $ABCD$ is cyclic.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ru83n05
172 posts
#72
Y by
Let $l$ be the perpendicular bisector of $AC$ and $X=l\cap BD$.

Part 1: If $\Gamma=(ABCD)$ is cyclic, then define $\{N, M\}=l\cap \Gamma$.
If we have two distinct points $P_1, P_2\in l$ such that $\angle P_1DA=\angle BDA$ and $\angle P_2BA=\angle DBC$, then notice that
$$(X, P_1; N, M)=-1=(X, P_2; N, M)\implies P_1=P_2$$so one direction is completed

Part 2: Now assume $P\in l$. Redefine $\{N, M\}=l\cap (CDA)$. $B, D$ both belong to the $D$ - apolonius circle in $\triangle DPX$, which has diameter $NM$. So $\angle NBM=90=\angle NDA$ and thus $(NMDB)$ is also cylcic. Hence $(ABCD)$ is cyclic.
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ike.chen
1162 posts
#74
Y by
Let $A_1$ denote the reflection of $A$ in $BD$, the midpoints of $A_1C$ and $A_1P$ be $M$ and $N$ respectively, and the pedal triangle of $A_1$ wrt $BCD$ be $XYZ$. It's easy to see $A_1YBZ$, $A_1ZCX$, and $A_1XDY$ are cyclic with diameters $A_1B$, $A_1C$, and $A_1D$ respectively.

Notice $$\angle PBC = \angle DBA = \angle DBA_1$$and $$\angle PDC = \angle BDA = \angle BDA_1.$$Now, because $ABCD$ is convex, it follows that $A_1$ and $P$ are isogonal conjugates wrt $BCD$. Thus, a well-known lemma implies $N$ is the center of $(XYZ)$.

By a homothety centered at $A_1$, we know $PA = PC$ holds if and only if $NY = NM$, which is equivalent to $M \in (XYZ)$. Now, since $A_1ZCX$ is centered at $M$, $$\angle XMZ = 2 \angle XCZ = 2 \angle BCD.$$In addition, we have $$\angle XYZ = \angle XYA_1 + \angle A_1YZ = \angle XDA_1 + \angle A_1BZ$$$$= \angle PDB + \angle DBP = 180^{\circ} - \angle BPD.$$Thus, $XYZM$ is cyclic if and only if $\angle BPD = 2 \angle BCD$.

Now, observe that $$\angle BAD = 180^{\circ} - \angle DBA - \angle BDA = 180^{\circ} - \angle PBC - \angle PDC$$$$= \angle BCD + \angle DBP + \angle BDP = \angle BCD + (180^{\circ} - \angle BPD).$$It follows that $ABCD$ is cyclic if and only if $\angle BPD = 2 \angle BCD$, which finishes. $\blacksquare$


Remark: Solving USA TST 2010/7 and reading this article by Evan Chen helped me with this question.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
fclvbfm934
759 posts
#75
Y by
We shall start with proving $AP = CP \Rightarrow ABCD$ is cyclic, as this is the harder portion.

The key is to focus on $PBD$ as the reference triangle. Then, we see that $BA$ and $BC$ are isogonal, as well as $DC$ and $DA$. Thus, $A$ and $C$ are isogonal conjugates of each other (with respect to $\triangle PBD$). In the diagram below, I've extended PC and marked the equal angles red, in case it is confusing what it means for $PA$ and $PC$ to be isogonal in this context.

A simple angle chase demonstrates that the perpendicular bisector of $AC$ (shown in dashed orange) is the external angle bisector of $\angle BPD$. Thus, this perpendicular bisector of $AC$ must pass through $I_B$ and $I_D$, the $B-$ and $D-$ excenters, respectively. Now comes the key claim:

Claim: $BCI_BAI_D$ and $DCI_DAI_B$ are both cyclic.

Proof: We shall show $BCI_BA$ is cyclic, as the others are analogous. Observe that $BI_B$ is the angle bisector of $\angle PBD$, but since $\angle PBC = \angle DBA$, we get that
$BI_B$ is also the angle bisector of $\angle ABC$! Thus, $I_B$ is the intersection of the perpendicular bisector of $AC$ and the angle bisector of $\angle ABC$, which is well known to be the arc midpoint of $\widehat{AC}$ on $(ABC)$, unless $BC = BA$. But we know $BC = BA$ is impossible, as that would imply $DB$ bisects $\angle CDA$.

A similar argument can be done to get $I_D$ lies on $(ABC)$: $BI_D$ is the external angle bisector of $\angle ABC$, and $I_DA = I_DC$, so $I_D$ must be the arc midpoint of $\widehat{ABC}$. $\Box$

Using the claim, both $B$ and $D$ lie on circumcircle $(ACI_BI_D)$, so $ABCD$ is cyclic as desired.
https://i.ibb.co/fDGbvRR/2004-imo-prob5.png

Now we prove $ABCD$ cyclic $\Rightarrow AP = CP$.

Let $X = BP \cap (ABCD)$ and $Y = DP \cap (ABCD)$. Because $\angle DBA = \angle XBC$, we have $ACDX$ is an isoceles trapezoid, so $DX || AC$. Similarly, we have $BY || AC$. Putting these together, we have $BY || DX$, so $BYXD$ is an isoceles trapezoid as well. This means that $BY, AC,$ and $DX$ share a perpendicular bisector.

Furthermore, we know that $P$, the intersection of diagonals of isoceles trapezoid $BYXD$, must lie on the perpendicular bisector of $BY$ and $XD$. Thus, $P$ is on the perpendicular bisector of $AC$ as well, proving $PA = PC$.
https://i.ibb.co/k0j6tg5/image.png
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
math_comb01
665 posts
#76
Y by
Cute and easy problem! Sketch
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by math_comb01, Jun 6, 2023, 6:43 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
lpieleanu
3143 posts
#77 • 1 Y
Y by huashiliao2020
Solved with huashiliao2020.

forward direction

backward direction
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by lpieleanu, Jul 20, 2023, 12:29 PM
Reason: typo
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8904 posts
#78 • 1 Y
Y by CT17
Very conceptual problem demonstrating how one deals with isogonal conjugates.

For one direction, let $ABCD$ be cyclic and denote $X = \overline{BP} \cap (ABCD)$, $Y = \overline{DP} \cap (ABCD)$. By the angle conditions, $ADXC$ and $ABYC$ are isosceles trapezoids. Thus it follows that $\overline{BY}, \overline{DX}, \overline{AC}$ share a perpendicular bisector, and the result follows.

For the other direction, notice that $A$ and $C$ are isogonal conjugates with respect to triangle $BPD$. Construct $X$ on $\overline{BP}$ such that $XP=DP$ and $Y$ similarly. The triangles $APB$ and $CPY$ are congruent as $\angle APB = \angle CPY$, thus $\overline{BY} \parallel \overline{AC} \parallel \overline{DX}$. On the other hand, $\angle CBX = \angle DBA = \angle CYX$, hence $BYCX$ is cyclic, and similarly $DYCX$ is cyclic. It follows that all the points $A, B, Y, C, X, D$ are concyclic, as needed.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
5007 posts
#79 • 1 Y
Y by centslordm
whoops

I first prove that if $ABCD$ is cyclic then $AP=CP$. The condition implies that $\overline{BD}$ and $\overline{BP}$ are isogonal in $\triangle BAC$, and $\overline{DB}$ and $\overline{DP}$ are isogonal in $\triangle DAC$. Let $B'$ and $D'$ be points such that $BB'AC$ and $DD'AC$ are isosceles trapezoids (with $\overline{BB'} \parallel \overline{DD'} \parallel \overline{AC}$), which also lie on $(ABCD)$. Then $B,P,D'$ are collinear, as are $D,P,B'$, so in fact $P=\overline{BD'} \cap \overline{DB'}$ which lies on the perpendicular bisector of $\overline{AC}$ by symmetry.

I will now prove that we don't need to consider the other direction! We use the following claim.

Claim: Let $X,Y,Z$ be points and $\ell$ be a line. Then either there are at most two points $R \in \ell$ such that $\ell$ and $\overline{RZ}$ are isogonal in $\triangle RXY$, or (algebraically) the isogonality always holds.
Proof: We use complex numbers with $\ell$ being the real axis (WLOG), denoting $X=x$ etc. The isogonality condition is equivalent to
$$\frac{r-x}{r-0} \div \frac{r-z}{r-y} \in \mathbb{R} \iff \frac{(r-x)(r-y)}{r-z} \in \mathbb{R} \iff (r-x)(r-y)(r-\overline{z})=(r-\overline{x})(r-\overline{y})(r-z).$$Upon expansion and simplification this means that any $r$ is the root of a fixed quadratic (in terms of $x,y,z$). If the quadratic is identically zero then the isogonality is true for all $P \in \ell$, otherwise it has at most two solutions. $\blacksquare$

Fix a choice of $B,A,C$, as well as line $\overline{BD}$; note the convex condition implies $\overline{BD}$ intersects segment $\overline{AC}$. Then if $AP=CP$, $P$ is fixed as well, since $\overline{BP}$ is a fixed line as $D$ varies. Now apply the claim with $\ell=\overline{BD}$ and $X=A,Y=C,Z=P$. Obviously we can't have $\overline{AP} \parallel \overline{CP}$, so at least one of them is not parallel to $\ell$; WLOG $\overline{CP}$. Then if $R$ is placed at $\overline{CP} \cap \ell$, then the isogonality does not hold, since $A \not \in \overline{BD}$ so $\angle (\overline{AR},\ell) \neq 0$ but $\angle (\overline{CR},\ell)=0$.

Hence the "at most two" part of the claim applies. Since $B$ and $\ell \cap (ABC) \neq B$ are valid positions for $R$ in the language of the claim, the first being tautological and the second being true due to the first part of this solution, it follows that $D$ must be placed at the second intersection of $\ell$ with $(ABC)$, whence $ABCD$ is cyclic. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
lelouchvigeo
185 posts
#80
Y by
This took soo long.
The problem is quite easy but i don't know why.
The case where $ABCD$ is cyclic is easy.
IF $AP=PC$ , then construct $D'$ such that $ADD'C$ is cyclic. Let $D'P$ intersect again at$ B'$.
Then by angle chasing B=B'
We are done
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by lelouchvigeo, Jan 15, 2024, 6:55 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
TheHazard
93 posts
#81
Y by
Why consider the other direction when you can just not !!

By shifting $D$ along $BD$, it follows that at most one value of $D$ on a fixed line works as the other line is fixed. As such, showing the result for cyclic $ABCD$ finishes.
Let $F$ be the midpoint of $\widehat{ADC}$ and $E$ the midpoint of $\widehat{ABC}$. It remains to show that $P, E, F$ are collinear.
Note that $\angle BPF = \angle BFP + \angle PBF = \angle BFE + \angle FBD$ $\angle EPD = \angle PED + \angle EDP = \angle FED + \angle BDE$.
As such, it follows that $\angle BPF + \angle EPD = 2 \angle BDE + 2 \angle FBD = \angle BDP + PBD = BPD$ which finishes.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
p.lazarov06
56 posts
#82
Y by
Claim

$$\angle APD+\angle CPD=180^{\circ}$$

Proof Let $X$ be a point on $BD$ such that $\angle BAX=\angle CAD$. Now we can see that $P$ and $Q$ are isogonaly conjugate with respect to three of the four angle, so $X$ and $P$ are isogonaly conjugate with respect to $ABCD$. \end{proof}



Now let we start with the angle chase. $o$ means orange, $g$ means green and $x$ and $y$ are like the diagram that is (hopefully) attached.



$$\angle APB = 180^{\circ}-x-o-g=180^{\circ}-CPD=PDC+PCD=ADB+ACD-y=180^{\circ}-BAD-y=180^{\circ}-g-o-x$$

So this means that $x=y$, or $PA=PC$. The opposite direction is similar.
Attachments:
diagram.pdf (6kb)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6906 posts
#83 • 1 Y
Y by anantmudgal09
Is this problem possible with only isogonal conjugates and angle chasing? I tried for a while, until I got frustrated and took the easy way out:

More than 11 years later I attempted to solve the problem again without taking the easy way out, using the method suggested in post #82 above. This solution is below. It shows that this problem can be a lot more subtle than people expect, in that an attempt to solve the problem using only angles can require a separate analysis of the case where $P$ is on line $AC$; equivalently, $ABCD$ is a so-called quasi-harmonic quadrilateral. I do not have the patience to check whether various solutions above miss this case, but I suspect a few of them do ;)

The solution consists of two parts. The first part is that by angle chasing, we will prove that \[ \measuredangle PAC = \measuredangle ACP \iff \measuredangle BAC + \measuredangle CBD + \measuredangle DCA + \measuredangle ADB = 0. \qquad (\spadesuit). \]A careless reader would be forgiven for thinking that $(\spadesuit)$ implies the problem or at least one direction, but it turns out the situation is more subtle. The second part analyzes the angle conditions more carefully and provides a complete proof.
Proof of the equivalence $(\spadesuit)$ by angle chasing. We start with the following unconditional claim, valid for any quadrilateral.
Claim: [Isogonal conjugation] Let $ABCD$ and $P$ be as in the problem statement. Then $\measuredangle APB + \measuredangle CPD = 180^{\circ}$.
Proof. The angles in the statement imply that $A$ and $C$ are isogonal conjugates with respect to $\triangle PBC$. Thus, lines $PA$ and $PC$ are isogonal with respect to $\angle BPC$, as needed. $\blacksquare$

[asy]
import geometry;
size(9cm); pair A = (-0.50099,1.69422); pair B = (-1.8,-0.6); pair C = (0.09182,-1.79600); pair D = (1.55802,-0.60384); pair P = (-1.04359,-0.19363);
draw(circumcircle(A,B,C), gray+dashed); filldraw(A--B--C--D--cycle, invisible, black); draw(B--D); draw(A--C);
draw(C--P--A, brown); draw(B--P--D, gray);
markangle(radius=15, n=2, P, A, C, red, StickIntervalMarker(1,1, red)); markangle(radius=15, n=2, A, C, P, red, StickIntervalMarker(1,1, red)); markangle(radius=10, n=3, A, P, B, deepgreen, StickIntervalMarker(1,2, deepgreen)); markangle(radius=10, n=3, C, P, D, deepgreen, StickIntervalMarker(1,1, deepgreen)); markangle(radius=12, n=1, B, A, C, blue); markangle(radius=12, n=1, C, B, D, blue); markangle(radius=12, n=1, D, C, A, blue); markangle(radius=12, n=1, A, D, B, blue);
dot("$A$", A, dir(A)); dot("$B$", B, dir(B)); dot("$C$", C, dir(C)); dot("$D$", D, dir(D)); dot("$P$", P, dir(45));
[/asy]
Next we rewrite the two angles $\measuredangle APB$ and $\measuredangle CPD$ in the claim (colored green with three rings) so that their only dependence on $P$ is through the angles $\measuredangle PAC$ and $\measuredangle CAP$ (colored red with two rings), as follows: \begin{align*} -\measuredangle APB &= \measuredangle PBA + \measuredangle BAP = \measuredangle PBA + (\measuredangle BAC - \measuredangle PAC) \\ &= \measuredangle CBD + \measuredangle BAC - \measuredangle PAC \\ -\measuredangle CPD &= \measuredangle PDC + \measuredangle DCP = \measuredangle PDC + (\measuredangle DCA + \measuredangle ACP) \\ &= \measuredangle ADB + \measuredangle DCA + \measuredangle ACP. \end{align*}Since the claim says $\measuredangle APB + \measuredangle CPD = 0$, summing lets us finally rewrite $\measuredangle PAC - \measuredangle APC$ in terms of only $A$, $B$, $C$, $D$: \begin{align*} 0 &= (\measuredangle ACP - \measuredangle PAC) + \measuredangle ADB + \measuredangle DCA + \measuredangle CBD + \measuredangle BAC \\ \implies \measuredangle PAC - \measuredangle ACP &= \measuredangle ADB + \measuredangle DCA + \measuredangle CBD + \measuredangle BAC. \end{align*}These four latter angles are colored blue with one ring in the figure. This proves $(\spadesuit)$.
Quasi-harmonic quadrilaterals. To interpret the condition $(\spadesuit)$, we define a new term: a quadrilateral $ABCD$ is quasi-harmonic if $AB \cdot CD = BC \cdot DA$. (See IMO 2018/6 for another problem involving quasi-harmonic quadrilaterals.) The following two lemmas show why this condition is relevant:
Lemma: The condition \[ \measuredangle BAC + \measuredangle CBD + \measuredangle DCA + \measuredangle ADB = 0 \]is equivalent to $ABCD$ being either cyclic or quasi-harmonic or both.
Proof. This is proved by inversion at $A$; details to be added later. (See also https://problems.ru/view_problem_details_new.php?id=116602.) $\blacksquare$

Lemma: Quadrilateral $ABCD$ is quasi-harmonic if and only if $P$ lies on line $AC$.
Proof. Let $X = \overline{BD} \cap \overline{AC}$. If the isogonal of line $BD$ with respect to $\angle B$ meets line $AC$ at $Y$, then $\frac{AX}{CX} \frac{AY}{CY} = \left( \frac{BA}{BC} \right)^2$. Similarly if the isogonal to $\angle D$ meets line $AC$ at $Y'$, then $\frac{AX}{CX} \frac{AY'}{CY'} = \left( \frac{DA}{DC} \right)^2$. Hence $ABCD$ is quasi-harmonic if and only if $Y = Y'$ (that is, $Y=Y'=P$). $\blacksquare$

Wrap-up. We now show that $PA = PC$ if and only if $ABCD$ is cyclic by cases on whether $P$ lies on $\overline{AC}$.
  • If $ABCD$ is not quasi-harmonic, then $(\spadesuit)$ implies the problem statement immediately. Indeed, $\measuredangle PAC = \measuredangle ACP$ if and only if $PA = PC$ (as $\triangle PAC$ is not degenerate) and the second lemma turns our angle condition into $ABCD$ cyclic.
  • Now assume $ABCD$ is quasi-harmonic and $P$ lies on line $AC$. We ignore $(\spadesuit)$. Instead, note that if $ABCD$ is also cyclic then $\overline{BD}$ is a symmedian of $\triangle ABC$ and hence $P$ is the midpoint. Conversely, suppose we know $\overline{BD}$ is a symmedian of $\triangle ABC$. Let $D' \neq B$ be the point for which $ABCD'$ is cyclic and harmonic; then $B$, $D$, $D'$ are collinear and $\frac{BD}{CD} = \frac{BD'}{CD'} = \frac{BA}{CA}$. So $D' = D$ (the corresponding Apollonian circle only meets line $BD$ twice), as needed.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by v_Enhance, Feb 24, 2025, 9:46 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cj13609517288
1939 posts
#84
Y by
IM FREE

The forwards direction is simple: $P$ is just the intersection of $BD'$ and $DB'$, where $B'$ and $D'$ are the reflections of $B$ and $D$ respectively over the perpendicular bisector of $AC$.

The backwards direction is equivalent to the following:
Rewritten problem wrote:
Let $P$ and $Q$ be isogonal conjugates in triangle $ABC$. Let $R$ be the reflection of $Q$ over $BC$. Suppose that $AP=PR$. Prove that $R$ lies on $(ABC)$.
To do this, we complex bash. First, recall the two formulas
\[p=\frac{-abc\overline{q}^2+(ab+bc+ca)\overline{q}-a-b-c+q}{q\overline{q}-1}\]\[p+q+abc\overline{p}\overline{q}=a+b+c.\]This entire bash was performed from start to finish on paper, so I will only give a summary here of what happened. After expanding the $AP=PR$ condition, we get
\[\frac{1}{bc}(b+c-q)(b+c-bc\overline{q}-p)-b\overline{p}-c\overline{p}+bc\overline{p}\overline{q}=1-\frac pa-a\overline{p}.\]The $bc\overline{p}\overline{q}$ can be manipulated using our second well-known formula, and similarly for the $\frac{pq}{bc}$ on the LHS. Finally, replace the remaining appearances of $p$ using the first well-known formula. We end up with the sad-looking equation
\[(a+b+c-q)\left(b+c-bc\overline{q}+\frac{bc}{a}\right)(q\overline{q}-1)=(b+c)\left(-abc\overline{q}^2+ab\overline{q}+bc\overline{q}+ca\overline{q}-a-b-c+q-\frac1a q^2+\left(1+\frac ba+\frac ca\right)q-\left(b+c+\frac{bc}{a}\right)+\overline{q}bc\right).\]Thankfully for us, our goal is simply to show that
\[bcq\overline{q}-(b+c)q+(b^2+bc+c^2)-bc(b+c)\overline{q}=0\](this is the condition for $Q\in(BHC)$). It turns out that the LHS minus the RHS in the sad-looking equation is exactly
\[(bcq\overline{q}-(b+c)q+(b^2+bc+c^2)-bc(b+c)\overline{q})(q-a)\left(\overline{q}-\frac1a\right),\]which can be checked by verifying the coefficients of $1,q,q^2,q\overline{q},q^2\overline{q},q^2\overline{q}^2$ since it's equal to its conjugate. (None of these coefficients end up being more than a short line long.) $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by cj13609517288, May 15, 2025, 6:44 PM
Reason: "dash" -> "bash"
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
LHE96
12 posts
#87
Y by
[asy]
import geometry;
size(10cm);
pair A = (8,5.75);
pair B = (10,5);
pair D = (0,0);
path circ = circumcircle(A,B,D);
pair C = intersectionpoints(line((0,0),(1,0)),circ)[0];
pair P = intersectionpoint(
reflect(bisector(line(C,D),line(D,A)))*line(B,D),
reflect(perpendicular(B,bisector(line(A,B),line(B,C))))*line(B,D)
);
// if
pair I_ = incenter(B,P,D);
pair E_ = intersectionpoint(line(P,I_),line(A,D));
pair F = intersectionpoint(line(C,P),line(B,E_));
draw(B--F--P,blue); draw(P--I_,blue);
draw(incircle(B,P,D),blue); draw(I_--E_,blue);
draw(circumcircle(A,B,P),dotted); draw(circumcircle(F,E_,P),dotted);
// only if
pair M = (A+C)/2;
pair B_ = reflect(line(M,P))*B;
pair D_ = reflect(line(M,P))*D;
draw(P--M,red); draw(P--B_--D_--P,red); draw(B_--C--D_,red); draw(B--B_,red); draw(D--D_,red);
//
markangle(2,A,P,E_,radius=10);
markangle(2,E_,P,F,radius=10);
markangle(2,P,A,C,radius=10);
markangle(2,A,C,P,radius=10);
draw(B--D); draw(A--C); draw(B--P--D); draw(A--P--C);
draw(circumcircle(A,B,C),dotted);
draw(A--B--C--D--A);
dot("$A$",A,(0,1));
dot("$B$",B,(0.5,1));
dot("$C$",C,(1,-0.5));
dot("$D$",D,(-1,-0.5));
dot("$E$",E_,(-0.5,1),blue);
dot("$F$",F,(-0.5,1),blue);
dot("$P$",P,(0.5,-1.5));
dot("$M$",M,(-0.25,-2.5),red);
dot("$I$",I_,(0.25,1.25),blue);
dot("$B'$",B_,(0.5,1),red);
dot("$D'$",D_,(-0.5,-1),red);
[/asy]

Part 1: $ABCD$ cyclic $\implies$ $PA=PC$.

Assume $ABCD$ is cyclic. Let $I$ be the incenter of $\triangle BPD$ and $E=PI \cap AD$. Note that $\angle BPD = 180^{\circ}-\angle DBP-\angle PDB=(\angle ABC+\angle CDA)-\angle DBP-\angle PDB=2\angle ABD+2\angle BDA=2\angle BCD$ and so is $\angle BPI=\angle IPD=\angle BCD$. Note that $ABPE$ is cyclic since $\angle EAB+\angle BPE=\angle EAB+\angle BCD=180^{\circ}$.

We can see that triangles $\triangle DEP$ and $\triangle DBC$ are similar (because of $\angle EPD=\angle BCD$ and $\angle PDE=\angle CDB$), so $\angle DEP=\angle DBC=\angle DAC$ $\implies$ $EP\parallel AC$. Note that $D$ is the center of the spiral similarity sending $BC$ to $EP$ and let $F=BE\cap PC$. Then $BCDF$ and $EFDP$ are cyclic quadrilaterals.

By the cyclic quadrilaterals $APBE$, $BCDF$ and $EFDP$ we have $\angle APE=\angle ABE=\angle ADF=\angle EPF$. Finally, by $EP\parallel AC$, we have that $\angle EPF=\angle ACP$ and $\angle APE=\angle PAC$, and since these angles are equal, $\triangle APC$ is isosceles and hence $PA=PC$.

Part 2: $PA=PC$ $\implies$ $ABCD$ cyclic.

Assume $PA=PC$ ($\triangle APC$ isosceles). Let $M$ be the midpoint of $AC$. Since $\triangle APC$ is isosceles, $AC\perp PM$. Let $B'$ and $D'$ be the reflections of points $B$ and $D$ on the line $PM$. Note that $C$ is the reflection of $A$ on the line $PM$, and so we have $\triangle ABD\sim \triangle CB'D'$ by symmetry. Thus, $\angle CD'B'=\angle BDA$ and $\angle D'B'C=\angle ABD$.

It is not hard to see that $D$, $P$ and $B'$ are collinear (a simple angle chasing with $BB'\parallel PI$ gives us $\angle B'PB=180-\angle BPD$) and so $\angle CDB'=\angle BDA=\angle CD'B'$ $\implies$ $B'CD'D$ is cyclic. By the symmetry, $BB'D'D$ and $ACD'D$ are both isosceles trapezoids, and thus both are cyclic. Note that $ACD'D$, $BB'D'D$ and $B'CD'D$ all lie on the same circle and so $A$, $B$, $C$ and $D$ are concyclic, as desired.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a