ka April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.
WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.
Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!
Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29
Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Intermediate: Grades 8-12
Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
VOLUNTEERING OPPORTUNITY OPEN TO HIGH/MIDDLE SCHOOLERS
im_space_cadet5
N22 minutes ago
by maxamc
Hi everyone!
Do you specialize in contest math? Do you have a passion for teaching? Do you want to help leverage those college apps? Well, I have something for all of you.
I am im_space_cadet, and during the fall of last year, I opened my non-profit DeltaMathPrep which teaches students preparing for contest math the problem-solving skills they need in order to succeed at these competitions. Currently, we are very much understaffed and would greatly appreciate the help of more tutors on our platform.
Each week on Saturday and Wednesday, we meet once for each competition: Wednesday for AMC 8 and Saturday for AMC 10 and we go over a past year paper for the entire class. On both of these days, we meet at 9PM EST in the night.
This is a great opportunity for anyone who is looking to have a solid activity to add to their college resumes that requires low effort from tutors and is very flexible with regards to time.
This is the link to our non-profit for anyone who would like to view our initiative:
https://www.deltamathprep.org/
If you are interested in this opportunity, please send me a DM on AoPS or respond to this post expressing your interest. I look forward to having you all on the team!
Hi, I'm currently in 8th grade and I have about 6 months left to prepare for the AMC 10, and I really want to qualify for AIME and get above a 100. I took the AMC 8 this year and did really bad, with a score of 16, and a 35 on the MATHCOUNTS Chapter test. I have a feeling I would get about a 70 on the AMC 10 now, so I want to be able to improve by 30 points in 6 months. Is that possible? I have summer break coming up so I feel like I could study for about 4 hours a day every single day, and I'm willing to if that's what it takes. Do you have any ideas for what resources I should use? I know about Alcumus and I have some of the AOPS books, but not all of them. If you have any tips, let me know. Thank you so much!
Solved with resources, greendivisors, eg4334, lpieleanu, SigmaPiE, Arcticturn, and CoolJupiter.
Here, having several continguous characters as a variable name is absurd! A clear counterexample is in programming, a variable name is invalid if it contains spaces. Thus, the only reasonable explanation is a multiplication using the symbol standard. We want to solve: But this is just . Since we are in Middle School Math, we will not consider the case of as surely outrage will spark. Now if you are not experienced in the dark arts, a feeble-minded individual would simply plug in and sum it up. How absurd! Instead, we explore the more reasonable path of multiplying the "normal" sum of by , as every unit in the sum is replaced by the embedded within the sequence, clearly the intended path of the creator.
Now suppose it is thousands of years ago and we do not have a calculator. We instead use the approximation written by Euclid himself on a humble rock. Multiplying with our fingers, we obtain Since has significant figures, we round our answer accordingly to scientific procedure to obtain .
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by blueprimes, Apr 2, 2025, 2:37 AM
Solved with resources, greendivisors, eg4334, lpieleanu, SigmaPiE, Arcticturn, and CoolJupiter.
Here, having several continguous characters as a variable name is absurd! A clear counterexample is in programming, a variable name is invalid if it contains spaces. Thus, the only reasonable explanation is a multiplication using the symbol standard. We want to solve: But this is just . Since we are in Middle School Math, we will not consider the case of as surely outrage will spark. Now if you are not experienced in the dark arts, a feeble-minded individual would simply plug in and sum it up. How absurd! Instead, we explore the more reasonable path of multiplying the "normal" sum of by , as every unit in the sum is replaced by the embedded within the sequence, clearly the intended path of the creator.
Now suppose it is thousands of years ago and we do not have a calculator. We instead use the approximation written by Euclid himself on a humble rock. Multiplying with our fingers, we obtain Since has significant figures, we round our answer accordingly to scientific procedure to obtain .
Solved with resources, greendivisors, eg4334, lpieleanu, SigmaPiE, Arcticturn, and CoolJupiter.
Here, having several continguous characters as a variable name is absurd! A clear counterexample is in programming, a variable name is invalid if it contains spaces. Thus, the only reasonable explanation is a multiplication using the symbol standard. We want to solve: But this is just . Since we are in Middle School Math, we will not consider the case of as surely outrage will spark. Now if you are not experienced in the dark arts, a feeble-minded individual would simply plug in and sum it up. How absurd! Instead, we explore the more reasonable path of multiplying the "normal" sum of by , as every unit in the sum is replaced by the embedded within the sequence, clearly the intended path of the creator.
Now suppose it is thousands of years ago and we do not have a calculator. We instead use the approximation written by Euclid himself on a humble rock. Multiplying with our fingers, we obtain Since has significant figures, we round our answer accordingly to scientific procedure to obtain .
Best solution so far but this makes a slight assumption which seems trivial but is actually incorrect. However, this would probably still get partials.
Intended sol (according to some moppers): Click to reveal hidden text
Let be the group with set and operation of multiplication. Suppose, furthermore, that . We obtain with as an identity, that the distributive property only applies to the terms of within the notation . In particular, ,,, and are not considered. Therefore the correct radical form is , or
Remark: I don't know how it would be expected in contest for anyone to actually be able to evaluate within a reasonable timing even after finding the (already hard) cruxes of considering and finding , so this problem is probably best just to be posted here for us to speculate and not used within a timed contest.
This post has been edited 6 times. Last edited by arfekete, Apr 2, 2025, 2:53 AM
For clarity, we will write any " " in our math as "space". Then spacespacespacespace so space=
We aim to compute spacespacespacespacespacespacespacespacespacespacespace This is simply: We will now estimate to the nearest integer, because every number in the problem is an integer. we have 1.6^4=6.5536<7 but 1.7^4=8.3521 so Similarly, Thus, the first part is
for the second part, finitely many nested roots bad. infinitely many better. assume infinitely many. let it be then so Now, use newton's method on Guess Then Close enough.
Finally, Our sum is which fittingly enough is the last two digits of the year. Also, the sum of the first two parts and the last part are, when rounded, are the two squares that when combined with the three in the date, make the first five squares, which is a beautiful easter egg in memorium for easter being in (last two digits of year)-(month number) days.