Join our free webinar April 22 to learn about competitive programming!

Contests & Programs AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
3 M G
BBookmark  VNew Topic kLocked
Contests & Programs AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
3 M G
BBookmark  VNew Topic kLocked
G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
Another System
worthawholebean   3
N 2 hours ago by P162008
Source: HMMT 2008 Guts Problem 33
Let $ a$, $ b$, $ c$ be nonzero real numbers such that $ a+b+c=0$ and $ a^3+b^3+c^3=a^5+b^5+c^5$. Find the value of
$ a^2+b^2+c^2$.
3 replies
worthawholebean
May 13, 2008
P162008
2 hours ago
Inequality with three conditions
oVlad   2
N 2 hours ago by Quantum-Phantom
Source: Romania EGMO TST 2019 Day 1 P3
Let $a,b,c$ be non-negative real numbers such that \[b+c\leqslant a+1,\quad c+a\leqslant b+1,\quad a+b\leqslant c+1.\]Prove that $a^2+b^2+c^2\leqslant 2abc+1.$
2 replies
oVlad
Yesterday at 1:48 PM
Quantum-Phantom
2 hours ago
GCD Functional Equation
pinetree1   61
N 2 hours ago by ihategeo_1969
Source: USA TSTST 2019 Problem 7
Let $f: \mathbb Z\to \{1, 2, \dots, 10^{100}\}$ be a function satisfying
$$\gcd(f(x), f(y)) = \gcd(f(x), x-y)$$for all integers $x$ and $y$. Show that there exist positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that $f(x) = \gcd(m+x, n)$ for all integers $x$.

Ankan Bhattacharya
61 replies
pinetree1
Jun 25, 2019
ihategeo_1969
2 hours ago
An easy FE
oVlad   3
N 3 hours ago by jasperE3
Source: Romania EGMO TST 2017 Day 1 P3
Determine all functions $f:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$ such that \[f(xy-1)+f(x)f(y)=2xy-1,\]for any real numbers $x{}$ and $y{}.$
3 replies
1 viewing
oVlad
Yesterday at 1:36 PM
jasperE3
3 hours ago
Interesting F.E
Jackson0423   12
N 3 hours ago by jasperE3
Show that there does not exist a function
\[
f : \mathbb{R}^+ \to \mathbb{R}
\]satisfying the condition that for all \( x, y \in \mathbb{R}^+ \),
\[
f(x + y^2) \geq f(x) + y.
\]

~Korea 2017 P7
12 replies
Jackson0423
Apr 18, 2025
jasperE3
3 hours ago
p^3 divides (a + b)^p - a^p - b^p
62861   49
N 3 hours ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: USA January TST for IMO 2017, Problem 3
Prove that there are infinitely many triples $(a, b, p)$ of positive integers with $p$ prime, $a < p$, and $b < p$, such that $(a + b)^p - a^p - b^p$ is a multiple of $p^3$.

Noam Elkies
49 replies
62861
Feb 23, 2017
Ilikeminecraft
3 hours ago
3D geometry theorem
KAME06   0
3 hours ago
Let $M$ a point in the space and $G$ the centroid of a tetrahedron $ABCD$. Prove that:
$$\frac{1}{4}(AB^2+AC^2+AD^2+BC^2+BD^2+CD^2)+4MG^2=MA^2+MB^2+MC^2+MD^2$$
0 replies
KAME06
3 hours ago
0 replies
Funny easy transcendental geo
qwerty123456asdfgzxcvb   1
N 3 hours ago by golue3120
Let $\mathcal{S}$ be a logarithmic spiral centered at the origin (ie curve satisfying for any point $X$ on it, line $OX$ makes a fixed angle with the tangent to $\mathcal{S}$ at $X$). Let $\mathcal{H}$ be a rectangular hyperbola centered at the origin, scaled such that it is tangent to the logarithmic spiral at some point.

Prove that for a point $P$ on the spiral, the polar of $P$ wrt. $\mathcal{H}$ is tangent to the spiral.
1 reply
qwerty123456asdfgzxcvb
6 hours ago
golue3120
3 hours ago
domino question
kjhgyuio   0
3 hours ago
........
0 replies
kjhgyuio
3 hours ago
0 replies
demonic monic polynomial problem
iStud   0
3 hours ago
Source: Monthly Contest KTOM April P4 Essay
(a) Let $P(x)$ be a monic polynomial so that there exists another real coefficients $Q(x)$ that satisfy
\[P(x^2-2)=P(x)Q(x)\]Determine all complex roots that are possible from $P(x)$
(b) For arbitrary polynomial $P(x)$ that satisfies (a), determine whether $P(x)$ should have real coefficients or not.
0 replies
iStud
3 hours ago
0 replies
Isosceles Triangulation
worthawholebean   70
N Apr 2, 2025 by akliu
Source: USAMO 2008 Problem 4
Let $ \mathcal{P}$ be a convex polygon with $ n$ sides, $ n\ge3$. Any set of $ n - 3$ diagonals of $ \mathcal{P}$ that do not intersect in the interior of the polygon determine a triangulation of $ \mathcal{P}$ into $ n - 2$ triangles. If $ \mathcal{P}$ is regular and there is a triangulation of $ \mathcal{P}$ consisting of only isosceles triangles, find all the possible values of $ n$.
70 replies
worthawholebean
May 1, 2008
akliu
Apr 2, 2025
Isosceles Triangulation
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: USAMO 2008 Problem 4
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
huashiliao2020
1292 posts
#58
Y by
badly written sol

The answer is all numbers n of the form 2^a+2^b, a,b nonnegative. Notice 2n works if n works because you can take A_iA_{i+2} as a side which makes isosceles triangle A_iA_{i+1}A_{i+2}, which we'll classify as short triangles. It's evident that doing this for the entire polygon reduces each two segments into one, effectively halving the sides.

On the other hand, we show that a polygon with one long side and l shorter sides can be triangulated iff l=2^k (we would think of this by drawing any diagonal which motivates it by reading this proof backwards). From the 2n<->n footnote, we only need to consider odd # of sides polygon not of the form 2^k+1 and show they don't work (since this will effectively cover all evens as well), and also show 2^k+1 works. WLOG orient the longest side to be at the bottom. Since 2^k+1 is odd, for the longest side to form an isosceles triangle, it needs to connect to the top most vertex. But this reduces the problem to (2^k+1-1)/2=2^{k-1}, which we know works. On the other hand, if it's not 2^k+1 sides, then by connecting the same vertices we reduce to a problem that is the form $2^ij\forall j=2m+1$, which by induction hypothesis we know cannot be triangulated. Hence all numbers of the form $2^a(2^b+1)$ work.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
trk08
614 posts
#59
Y by
horribly written
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Jndd
1416 posts
#60
Y by
We claim that all the numbers of the form $2^m+2^n$ for nonnegative $m,n$ work.

Label the vertices of a regular n-gon from $0$ to $n-1$. Notice that all edges must be part of some triangle, so edge $(k,k+1)$, vertices taken mod $n$, must be a part of one of the following three triangles
\begin{align*}
    &(k,k+1) - (k+1, k+2) - (k, k+2)\\
    &(k-1,k) - (k, k+1) - (k-1,k+1)\\
    &(k,k+1) - (k+1, k+1 + \frac{n-1}{2}) - (k+1 + \frac{n-1}{2}, k)\\
\end{align*}When $n$ is even, we must use either option 1 or 2 repeatedly for all the edges, so we see that $n$ has a triangulation if and only if $n/2$ has a triangulation.

However, when $n$ is odd, we must use option 3 exactly once. WLOG, $(n-1,0)$ is the edge that uses option 3, so we can't have vertex $\frac{n-1}{2}$ be blocked by $(\frac{n-3}{2},\frac{n+1}{2})$, so we need $2\mid \frac{n-1}{2}$, giving $n=4c+1$. Now, the polygon is split into two halves, and for each half, we must be able to connect consecutive edges, because we can't use option 3 more than once. From this, we can arrive at $n=2^t+1$ for some nonnegative $t$.

Using the previous two cases, we can have $n=2^t(2^u+1)$ or $n=2^t$, which is equivalent to what we claimed.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
peace09
5417 posts
#61
Y by
Click to reveal hidden text
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
joshualiu315
2513 posts
#62
Y by
The answer is $n=\boxed{2^a(2^b+1)}$ for nonnegative integers $a,b$.

For the sake of definitions, begin with a regular $(2n+1)$-gon with points $A_1, A_2, \dots, A_{2n+1}$ in that order. Define a \textit{small} triangle to be a triangle likewise to $A_1A_2A_3$ and define a \textit{large} triangle to be a triangle likewise to $A_1A_{n+1}A_{2n+1}$.


Claim: If a $n$-gon can be triangulated, so can a $2n$-gon.

Proof: Notice that filling out the $2n$-gon with small triangles will result in an $n$-gon, which proves the claim. $\square$


Now, consider the aforementioned regular $(2n+1)$-gon. Evidently, there must be at least one large triangle. Upon further inspection, we see that each of the large triangles contains the center and thus, there are only $1$ such triangle.

The large triangle splits the polygon into two $n+1$ sided polygons with $n$ equal sides. Then, it is clear that $n$ must be a power of two, so the only $k$-gons with an odd number of sides must have $k=2^b+1$ for a nonnegative integer $b$. Then, we can multiply this by any factor of $2$, so our answer results.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
EpicBird08
1747 posts
#63
Y by
Our answer is $n = 2^x (2^y + 1).$

We will first need the following:

Claim: $2n$ works if and only if $n$ works.
Proof: If $n$ works, then $2n$ works because we can connect two corners that are not connected but closest possible with an edge. This gives $n$ isosceles triangles (which we will call $1-1-2$ triangles) on the side. Now, if $2n$ works, we note that every edge is contained in some triangle. Suppose that two adjacent vertices of a $2n$-gon are $A$ and $B,$, where $A$ and $B$ are in the same triangle. There is no point diametrically opposite an edge on a $2n$-gon, so to make an isosceles triangle, so the third point of this triangle $C$ must be adjacent to either $A$ or $B,$ creating a $1-1-2$ triangle. This repeats for every edge, giving a regular $n$-gon in the middle. Since $2n$ works, that forces $n$ to work, as claimed.

Since $n = 4$ clearly works, all powers of $2$ work, at which point we can note that $2^k = 2^{k-1}(2^0 + 1).$ Therefore, we only need to consider odd $n.$

There are two parts to the problem from here: proving that odd numbers of the form $2^k + 1$ work, and proving that the rest don't.

Part 1: Proving that $2^k + 1$ work. We attach a construction for $k = 5;$ it is obvious how to generalize.

Part 2: Proving that the rest don't work. Suppose that we have adjacent vertices $A$ and $B$ in our $(2k + 1)$-gon. Then they must be part of the same triangle. There are $2$ ways that this triangle is isosceles: the first is if $A$ and $B$ are in a $1-1-2$ triangle, and the second is if this triangle includes the point diametrically opposite segment $AB,$ which we will call $C.$ Call a triangle $ABC$ very long. Note that every $1-1-2$ triangle covers $2$ edges of the polygon, but there are $2k + 1$ edges. Therefore, there is exactly one very long triangle in such a triangulation.

This very long triangle splits the polygon into $2$ congruent regions, each with $k$ edges facing outward and $1$ edge being inside the polygon. Note that $k$ is even, otherwise we cannot include the outward edges inside our triangulation (triangles containing outward edges are forced to be $1-1-2$). Similarly, $\frac{k}{2}$ is even, and so is $\frac{k}{4},$ and so on. This forces $k$ to be a power of $2,$ so $2k + 1 = 2^{x} + 1.$

Therefore, the only odd $n$ that work are $n$ of the form $2^x + 1.$ As a result, the only $n$ that work are $n$ of the form $2^x (2^y + 1),$ as claimed at the beginning.
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
shendrew7
794 posts
#64
Y by
The key intuition is to consider the "small sides" of each shape we are triangulating. We use casework based on the value of $n$.
  • $n$ is even: Each side must be the leg of an isosceles triangle rather than the base. Consequently, we are forced to pair the sides off at every other vertex, creating an interior $\frac n2$-gon. Repeating this, we see that an $n$-gon is successfully triangulated $\iff$ an $\frac{n}{2^{v_2(n)}}$-gon can be triangulated.

    The only special case to consider if when $n$ is a power of two, but we note these always work as we can use this algorithm to obtain a square.
  • $n$ is odd: Let $n=2n_1+1$. We pair off the sides again, but this time 1 is left out. We are forced to use this side as the base with the vertex being the opposite vertex of the $n$-gon. Hence if $\frac{n_1}{2}<1$, we're done, but otherwise it must be an integer.

    Then let $n_1=2n_2$. After the previous move, we are left to triangulate two congruent polygons with $n_2$ small sides and one long side. This long side is longer than any diagonal in this new polygon, so it must be used as the base. Hence, if $\frac{n_2}{2}<1$, we're done, but otherwise it must be an integer.

    We continue, concluding that we require $n=2^x+1$ for a positive integer $x$.

Hence our solutions for $n$ are $\boxed{2^x, 2^x+1, 2^x\left(2^y+1\right) \forall x,y \in \mathbb{Z}^+}$. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Markas
105 posts
#65
Y by
Case 1: n is even

Claim: If n is even, it works if and only if $\frac{n}{2}$ works.

Proof: If $\frac{n}{2}$ works, we can easily draw isosceles triangles on the top of every side of the old polygon. Now we have to prove the other direction. This can happen if we just pair up the adjacent sides of the polygon and draw the edges between them. This is the only such triangulation since the center of the polygon lies on the perpendicular bisector of a side, but no vertex lies on this bisector.

Case 2: n is odd

Claim: If n is odd, n works if $n = 2^k + 1$.

Proof: Let a triangle be called big if it passes through the center of the n-gon. There is exactly one big triangle. Now this triangle divides the n-gon into two equal polygons. When each equal polygon has $2^{p-1}+1$ vertices for some p, we can triangulate it. Then the outer perimeter of the equal polygons concurrent with the side of the n-gon must be triangulated into small isosceles triangles, and we must continue this process $\Rightarrow$ it is only possible when $\frac{n-1}{2}$ is a power of 2 $\Rightarrow$ n works if n is of the form $n = 2^m(2^l +1)$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
dolphinday
1320 posts
#66
Y by
The answer is all $n$ so that $n = 2^a + 2^b$.
First we can show that a $n$-polygon is dissectible into isosceles triangles if and only if a $2n$-polygon is.
Note that in a $2n$-polygon, the only isosceles triangle containing $V_iV_{i+1}$ is $\triangle V_{i}V_{i+1}V_{i+2}$(or $\triangle V_{i}V_{i+1}V_{i-1}$).
So then this leaves us with the pairs of adjacent sides triangulated and a central $n$-gon, which must be dissectible into isosceles triangles if the $2n$-gon is. The reverse also holds true, clearly.
We can then show all $2^a + 1$-gons are dissectible into isosceles triangles, with the attached construction.
Our construction also shows the impossibility of $n \neq 2^a + 1$(which suffices as we can multiply by $2$ as much as we want).
This is because we are forced to (WLOG) draw in $\triangle PGH$, and continuously group adjacent sides into triangles(thus dividing the number of sides by $2$) until we get a number of sides that is not a power of $2$, from which we can't draw in any more triangles.
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Om245
163 posts
#67
Y by
Answer is $2^m(2^n+1)$ for any $m,n$ whole number.

Claim:
$2n$ work if and only if $n$ works

If $n$ work, we can just add one vertex at midpoint of arc of each side, and hence so $2n$ works. Suppose $2n$ works, we have triangle \empty{good} if both of it's equal side are side of polygon. Now we claim all side of polygon are covered by \empty{good} triangles.

Suppose some side of polygon is not coverd by \empty{good} triangle then as number of side are even, perpendicular bisector of side of polygon pass through midpoint of arc of opposite side (as we always get rectangle for even side polygon). Hence we can't have isosceles triangle with base side as polygon side. Therefore only way is all side of polygon are part of \empty{good} triangle. Which give us another polygon at side $n$. Hence if $2n$ is possible then so $n$.

Claim:
If an odd $n$ works, then $n = 2^k+1$

let $n=2m+1$. All side of polygon can't be side of \empty{good} triangle, Assume side $V_1V_2$ is base for some isosceles triangle. Then note it has to be $\triangle V_1V_2V_{m+2}$.

Main observation is now we can't connect any vertex from ${V_3,V_4, \cdots V_{m+1}}$ so set ${V_{m+3},\cdots V_{2m+1}}$
By same arrgument as used in first claim, we have to use all side of polygon in \empty{good} triangle. then we have triangle $\triangle V_2V_3V_4, \cdots \triangle V_{m}V_{m+1}V_{m+2}$ as \empty{good} triangle. Note for this we should have $m+2$ even, hence $m$ is even.
Now we observe that after this we have polygon with side $V_2V_4V_6\cdots V_{m+2}$ (for one side). And if we consider it's side, then by same logic we still have to make \empty{good} triangles only. Doing this many time, we will be always making \empty{good} triangle on exiting polygon made up. Hence we only increase $v_2(m)$ each time. We finally end up with $m = 2^k$ for some $k$.
Hence $n=2^k+1$ for odd $n$.

This give us only answer, are number of type $2^m(2^n+1)$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
eg4334
631 posts
#68
Y by
.
The idea for this problem is super fun. The answer is all numbers of the form $\boxed{2^m(2^n+1)}$ for nonnegative integers $m, n$. Call a number that can be triangulated "funny". Call an isosceles triangle consisting of two adjacent sides of a polygon an "edge" triangle. The problem is split into two main claims:

Claim: A even number $2n$ is funny if and only if $n$ is funny.
Proof: One direction is obvious by inscribing a $n$-gon inside of the $2n$-gon by making isosceles triangles out of adjacent sides. For the other direction, consider any side. Note that the triangle containing this side must have this small side as one of the two isosceles sides because $2n$ is even. Therefore we must have one corner cut out. Repeat this process around the $2n$-gon, proving the claim. $\blacksquare$.

Claim: A odd number $n$ is funny if and only if $n = 2^m+1$ for some integer $m$.
Proof:
Direction 1: We wish to show that all $2^m+1$ are funny. Consider one side of this polygon and form an isosceles triangle with the diametrically opposite vertice. We then form these two hemispheres on the side (see the image in the beginning for a visual I don't feel like asying right now). We induct on these hemispheres. Note that the number of vertices in these hemispheres are also one more than a power of two. The base case is obvious, and to generalize to the next hemisphere (i.e. upping the power of two by one) by creating edge triangles on the sides of this new hemisphere. Thus by induction all $2^m+1$ work, because we can dissect each of these hemispheres into isosceles triangles.

Direction 2: We wish to show that all funny $n$-gons with $n$ odd must satisfy $n=2^m+1$. Consider the sides of this $n$-gon: These sides are either part of an edge triangle or have the third vertice diametrically opposite. Note that because $n$ is odd we cannot have all edge triangles and must have at least one diameter triangle. But because it is a diameter and these cannot intersect, we have exactly one diameter triangle. Now consider the two hemispheres drawn. We wish to show all hemispheres must have a number of vertices one more than a power of two. Consider one side of these hemispheres adajcent to the long diameter drawn. Because we cannot have another diameter, this side must be part of an edge triangle. Continue this process around the hemisphere, forming another hemisphere. Therefore we have shown that if a $k$ vertice hemisphere is funny then the $\frac{k+1}{2}$ vertice hemisphere works as well. This process continues until we reach a triangle, i.e $3=2^1+1$. Now we work backwards to get the previous one to be $2(2^1+1)-1 = 2^2+1$. Now the result immediately follows by induction.

Both directions are proven so the claim is done. $\blacksquare$.

This is enough to finish. All odd $n$ are of the stated form, and all even $n$ are also of the stated form so we are done.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by eg4334, Jan 13, 2025, 4:33 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Maximilian113
549 posts
#69
Y by
Sketch:

Note that if $n$ was even, consider one of the edges of the polygon. Since it is part of an isosceles triangle, it cannot be the base since $n$ is even. Therefore, it must be paired with an adjacent edge, and using the same logic to the other edges reduces our problem to triangulating a regular $\frac{n}{2}$-gon. Thus, if $n$ is even it works if and only if $\frac{n}{2}$ works, so we consider when $n$ is odd. Clearly it is impossible to pair all the edges, so there must be one edge that is the base of an isosceles triangle. Once we construct this triangle, clearly the legs must be the base of another triangle (since there is no way to fit another one of that side length in each of the remaining two quadrilaterals). This works if and only if these remaining quadrilaterals have an odd amount of vertices. Continuing this logic, the following must be true: Let $a_i$ be a sequence of numbers such that $a_1=n, a_i = \frac{a_{i-1}+1}{2}$ for $i \geq 2,$ then at some point $a_i$ converges to $1.$ It is easy to show that only $n=2^k+1$ for some $k$ works. Therefore, in general if it is possible to write $n=2^i+2^j$ for nonnegative integers $i, j$ then $n$ works (because all odds of the form $2^k+1$ work while $n=4$ also clearly works.)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
blueprimes
331 posts
#70
Y by
Solved during chem, really fun problem! I think this is a different solution.

We claim the answer is all $n$ expressible in the form $2^a + 2^b$ for nonnegative integers $(a, b) \ne (0, 0)$. Label the vertices of the $n$-gon $A_0, A_2, \dots, A_{n - 1}$ in clockwise order. All proceeding indices referring to vertices of the $n$-gon are $\pmod{n}$. Define a $k$-bowl as a polygon $A_{i} A_{i + 1} \dots A_{i + k}$ where $k \le \left\lfloor \dfrac{n}{2} \right\rfloor$.

$\textbf{Claim 1:}$ A $k$-bowl $B_0 B_2 \dots B_k$ can be triangulated if and only if $k$ is a power of $2$.

Proof. Consider a $k$-bowl that can be fully triangulated. Clearly no other segment has the same length as $B_1 B_{k + 1}$ so $k$ must be even and segments $B_0 B_{k / 2}$ and $B_k B_{k / 2}$ are drawn. This yields a triangle and two $k / 2$-bowls. Thus, a $k$-bowl can be fully triangulated if and only if a $k / 2$-bowl can be triangulated. This readily implies that the only $k$ that work are powers of two.

Returning to the original problem, first we show a construction for any $n = 2^a + 2^b$. If $a = b$, simply draw segment $A_0 A_{2^a}$ dissecting the $n$-gon into two $2^a$-bowls. By $\textbf{Claim 1}$ we can fully triangulate these polygons as wanted.

Now if $a \ne b$, WLOG $a > b$. Then we can draw triangle $A_0 A_{2^{a - 1}} A_{2^{a - 1} + 2^b}$ which dissects the $n$-gon into a triangle and two $2^{a - 1}$-bowls and one $2^b$-bowl, each of which can be fully triangulated, so again this works.

Finally, we show necessity. In any $n$-gon that can be fully triangulated, consider an arbitrary triangulation, and WLOG $A_0 A_p A_{p + q}$ where $p, q, r$ are positive integers is the isoceles triangle with $A_0 A_p = A_0 A_{p + q}$ that (not strictly) contains the center of the $n$-gon. Then polygons $A_0 A_1 \dots A_p, A_p A_{p + 1} \dots A_{p + q}, A_{p + q} A_{p + q + 1} \dots A_0$ are bowls, and thus we require $p$ and $q$ to be powers of $2$. But $n = 2p + q$ and hence is expressible in the form $2^a + 2^b$. Our solution is complete.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by blueprimes, Feb 24, 2025, 2:25 AM
Reason: bowl
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
gladIasked
648 posts
#71
Y by
Outline: The answer is all $n=2^i+2^j$ for some nonnegative integers $i$ and $j$. We can show that $n=2^i+1$ can be triangulated with some induction. It's also easy to show that if a $k$-gon can be triangulated, so can a $2k$-gon (draw a segment connecting every other vertex in the $2k$-gon), so we're done.

We can also show that if $n$ cannot be triangulated (with isosceles triangles), $n/2$ cannot be triangulated either — this is easy to see by noting that every side must be paired with exactly one other side when $n$ is even. In particular, each side needs to be paired with one adjacent side, so we're back at the $n/2$ case.

Finally, when $n$ is an odd number not of the form $2^i+1$, in any legal triangulation we must draw the ``large" isosceles triangle going directly across the middle of the $n$-gon. We can show that the remaining two polygons cannot be triangulated with some induction.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
akliu
1793 posts
#72
Y by
Note that there must exist at least one triangle in the triangulation; draw that triangle, and our polygon is split into three regions: two containing $k$ line segments, and one containing $n - 2k$ line segments. There must be another triangle such that the base of the new triangle is one of the line segments of the older triangle, meaning that we can split the region with $k$ line segments into two regions with $\frac{k}{2}$ line segments. The only way this is possible is if $k$ is even, or $k = 2$ in which case the recursive method stops. Therefore, $k$ is a perfect power of $2$, and so is $2k$. Since we can do the same thing to $n-2k$, that means that $n-2k$ is also a perfect power of $2$, and all such $n$ are the sum of two powers of $2$.
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a