Join our free webinar April 22 to learn about competitive programming!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
All prime factors under 8
qwedsazxc   23
N 6 minutes ago by Giant_PT
Source: 2023 KMO Final Round Day 2 Problem 4
Find all positive integers $n$ satisfying the following.
$$2^n-1 \text{ doesn't have a prime factor larger than } 7$$
23 replies
qwedsazxc
Mar 26, 2023
Giant_PT
6 minutes ago
Interesting F.E
Jackson0423   14
N 6 minutes ago by Jackson0423
Show that there does not exist a function
\[
f : \mathbb{R}^+ \to \mathbb{R}
\]satisfying the condition that for all \( x, y \in \mathbb{R}^+ \),
\[
f(x + y^2) \geq f(x) + y.
\]

~Korea 2017 P7
14 replies
Jackson0423
Apr 18, 2025
Jackson0423
6 minutes ago
hard problem
Cobedangiu   4
N 6 minutes ago by giangtruong13
Let $x,y,z>0$ and $xy+yz+zx=3$ : Prove that :
$\sum  \ \frac{x}{y+z}\ge\sum  \frac{1}{\sqrt{x+3}}$
4 replies
Cobedangiu
Apr 2, 2025
giangtruong13
6 minutes ago
2^x+3^x = yx^2
truongphatt2668   0
7 minutes ago
Prove that the following equation has infinite integer solutions:
$$2^x+3^x = yx^2$$
0 replies
truongphatt2668
7 minutes ago
0 replies
high school math
aothatday   8
N Today at 1:09 AM by EthanNg6
Let $x_n$ be a positive root of the equation $x^n=x^2+x+1$. Prove that the following sequence converges: $n^2(x_n-x_{ n+1})$
8 replies
aothatday
Apr 10, 2025
EthanNg6
Today at 1:09 AM
Why is this series not the Fourier series of some Riemann integrable function
tohill   1
N Yesterday at 11:53 PM by alexheinis
$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{\frac{\sin nx}{\sqrt{n}}}$ (0<x<2π)
1 reply
tohill
Yesterday at 8:08 AM
alexheinis
Yesterday at 11:53 PM
Research Opportunity
dinowc   0
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Hi everyone, my name is William Chang and I'm a second year phd student at UCLA studying applied math. Over the past year, I've mentored many undergraduates at UCLA to finished papers (currently under review) in reinforcement learning (see here. :juggle:)

I'm looking to expand my group (and the topics I'm studying) so if you're interested, please let me know. I would especially encourage you to reach out to me chang314@g.ucla.edu if you like math. :wow:
0 replies
dinowc
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
0 replies
Computational Calculus - SMT 2025
Munmun5   3
N Yesterday at 9:58 PM by alexheinis
Source: SMT 2025
1. Consider the set of all continuous and infinitely differentiable functions $f$ with domain $[0,2025]$ satisfying $$f(0)=0,f'(0)=0,f'(2025)=1$$and $f''$ is strictly increasing on $[0,2025]$ Compute smallest real M such that all functions in this set ,$f(2025)<M$ .
2. Polynomials $$A(x)=ax^3+abx^2-4x-c$$$$B(x)=bx^3+bcx^2-6x-a$$$$C(x)=cx^3+cax^2-9x-b$$have local extrema at $b,c,a$ respectively. find $abc$ . Here $a,b,c$ are constants .
3. Let $R$ be the region in the complex plane enclosed by curve $$f(x)=e^{ix}+e^{2ix}+\frac{e^{3ix}}{3}$$for $0\leq x\leq 2\pi$. Compute perimeter of $R$ .
3 replies
Munmun5
Yesterday at 9:35 AM
alexheinis
Yesterday at 9:58 PM
x^{2s}+x^{2s-1}+...+x+1 irreducible over $F_2$?
khanh20   1
N Yesterday at 6:20 PM by khanh20
With $s\in \mathbb{Z}^+; s\ge 2$, whether or not the polynomial $P(x)=x^{2s}+x^{2s-1}+...+x+1$ irreducible over $F_2$?
1 reply
khanh20
Yesterday at 6:18 PM
khanh20
Yesterday at 6:20 PM
Advice on Statistical Proof
ElectrickyRaikou   0
Yesterday at 6:12 PM
Suppose we are given i.i.d.\ observations $X_i$ from a distribution with probability density function (PDF) $f(x_i \mid \theta)$ for $i = 1, \ldots, n$, where the parameter $\theta$ has a prior distribution with PDF $\pi(\theta)$. Consider the following two approaches to Bayesian updating:

(1) Let $X = (X_1, \ldots, X_n)$ be the complete data vector. Denote the posterior PDF as $\pi(\theta \mid x)$, where $x = (x_1, \ldots, x_n)$, obtained by applying Bayes' rule to the full dataset at once.

(2) Start with prior $\pi_0(\theta) = \pi(\theta)$. For each $i = 1, \ldots, n$, let $\pi_{i-1}(\theta)$ be the current prior and update it using observation $x_i$ to obtain the new posterior:

$$\pi_i(\theta) = \frac{f(x_i \mid \theta) \pi_{i-1}(\theta)}{\int f(x_i \mid \theta) \pi_{i-1}(\theta) \, d\theta}.$$
Are the final posteriors $\pi(\theta \mid x)$ from part (a) and $\pi_n(\theta)$ from part (b) the same? Provide a proof or a counterexample.


Here is the proof I've written:

Proof

Do you guys think this is rigorous enough? What would you change?
0 replies
ElectrickyRaikou
Yesterday at 6:12 PM
0 replies
How to solve this problem
xiangovo   1
N Yesterday at 11:09 AM by loup blanc
Source: website
How many nonzero points are there on x^3y + y^3z + z^3x = 0 over the finite field \mathbb{F}_{5^{18}} up to scaling?
1 reply
xiangovo
Mar 19, 2025
loup blanc
Yesterday at 11:09 AM
Finite solution for x
Rohit-2006   1
N Yesterday at 10:41 AM by Filipjack
$P(t)$ be a non constant polynomial with real coefficients. Prove that the system of simultaneous equations —
$$\int_{0}^{x} P(t)sin t dt =0$$$$\int_{0}^{x}P(t) cos t dt=0$$has finitely many solutions $x$.
1 reply
Rohit-2006
Yesterday at 4:19 AM
Filipjack
Yesterday at 10:41 AM
We know that $\frac{d}{dx}\bigg(\frac{dy}{dx}\bigg)=\frac{d^2 y}{dx^2}.$ Why we
Vulch   1
N Yesterday at 10:28 AM by Aiden-1089
We know that $\frac{d}{dx}\bigg(\frac{dy}{dx}\bigg)=\frac{d^2 y}{dx^2}.$ Why we can't write $\frac{d^2 y}{dx^2}$ as $\frac{d^2 y}{d^2 x^2}?$
1 reply
Vulch
Yesterday at 9:15 AM
Aiden-1089
Yesterday at 10:28 AM
complex analysis
functiono   1
N Yesterday at 9:57 AM by Mathzeus1024
Source: exam
find the real number $a$ such that

$\oint_{|z-i|=1} \frac{dz}{z^2-z+a} =\pi$
1 reply
functiono
Jan 15, 2024
Mathzeus1024
Yesterday at 9:57 AM
IMO ShortList 2002, geometry problem 8
orl   21
N Mar 6, 2024 by starchan
Source: IMO ShortList 2002, geometry problem 8
Let two circles $S_{1}$ and $S_{2}$ meet at the points $A$ and $B$. A line through $A$ meets $S_{1}$ again at $C$ and $S_{2}$ again at $D$. Let $M$, $N$, $K$ be three points on the line segments $CD$, $BC$, $BD$ respectively, with $MN$ parallel to $BD$ and $MK$ parallel to $BC$. Let $E$ and $F$ be points on those arcs $BC$ of $S_{1}$ and $BD$ of $S_{2}$ respectively that do not contain $A$. Given that $EN$ is perpendicular to $BC$ and $FK$ is perpendicular to $BD$ prove that $\angle EMF=90^{\circ}$.
21 replies
orl
Sep 28, 2004
starchan
Mar 6, 2024
IMO ShortList 2002, geometry problem 8
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: IMO ShortList 2002, geometry problem 8
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
orl
3647 posts
#1 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Let two circles $S_{1}$ and $S_{2}$ meet at the points $A$ and $B$. A line through $A$ meets $S_{1}$ again at $C$ and $S_{2}$ again at $D$. Let $M$, $N$, $K$ be three points on the line segments $CD$, $BC$, $BD$ respectively, with $MN$ parallel to $BD$ and $MK$ parallel to $BC$. Let $E$ and $F$ be points on those arcs $BC$ of $S_{1}$ and $BD$ of $S_{2}$ respectively that do not contain $A$. Given that $EN$ is perpendicular to $BC$ and $FK$ is perpendicular to $BD$ prove that $\angle EMF=90^{\circ}$.
Attachments:
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by orl, Oct 25, 2004, 12:16 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
orl
3647 posts
#2 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Please post your solutions. This is just a solution template to write up your solutions in a nice way and formatted in LaTeX. But maybe your solution is so well written that this is not required finally. For more information and instructions regarding the ISL/ILL problems please look here: introduction for the IMO ShortList/LongList project and regardingsolutions :)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
grobber
7849 posts
#3 • 4 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, and 2 other users
Let $G=NE\cap S_1,\ X=NE\cap MK,\ Y=KF\cap MN$. The quadrilateral $XNKY$ is ccylic because $\angle MXN=\angle MYK=\frac \pi 2$, so $\angle MNE=\angle FKM\ (*)$. If we show that the triangles $MNE,FKM$ are similar, then we would have $\angle NMK=\pi-\angle YMK=\frac \pi 2+\angle MKY=\frac \pi 2+\angle NME+\angle KMF$, which is exactly what we want.

We thus need to show that $\frac{MN}{NE}=\frac{FK}{KM}\ (**)$, which, together with $(*)$, proves the similarity of $MNE,FKM$.

$(**)\iff NE\cdot KF=BN\cdot BK\ (***)$, because $BN=MK,\ BK=MN$. Since all triangles $BCD$ are similar, no matter which line $CD$ we choose, there is a spiral similarity $\mathcal S$ cantered at $B$ which maps $D\to C$. $\mathcal S$ maps $BD\to BC$, so if $K'=\mathcal S(K)$, then $K'\in BC$ and $\frac{BK'}{K'C}=\frac{BK}{KC}=\frac{CN}{NB}$, meaning that $K'$ is the symmetric of $N$ wrt the perpendicular bisector of $BC$.

We then have $NE\cdot NG=BN\cdot NC=BN\cdot BK'$, and this proves $(***)$ because $\frac{K'F'}{KF}=\frac{BK'}{BK}$ and $K'F'=NG$, so $\frac{NG}{KF}=\frac{BK'}{BK}$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The QuattoMaster 6000
1184 posts
#4 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10 and 1 other user
Alternate Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
77ant
435 posts
#5 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Strangely, $ \angle EMF\neq 90^{\circ}$ in my figure.
Why does it not hold in my figure? please help me :(
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The QuattoMaster 6000
1184 posts
#6 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
77ant wrote:
Strangely, $ \angle EMF\neq 90^{\circ}$ in my figure.
Why does it not hold in my figure? please help me :(
I think that $ E$ has to be on the major arc $ CB$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
jayme
9782 posts
#7 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Dear Mathlinkers,
this problem appears also many time on Mathlinks.
I research a synthetic proof without calculation or transformations...
Is there one?
Sincerely
Jean-Louis
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
math154
4302 posts
#8 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Hmm.... the problem seems to require $A$ to lie in between $C$ and $D$; I think 77ant's diagram satisfies all the conditions.

Here's a more straightforward way to establish (***) from grobber's solution...

The relation is equivalent to $\triangle{ENB}\sim\triangle{BKF}$, or $\angle{EBN}+\angle{FBK}=90^\circ$. By the Law of Sines on $\triangle{BDF}$, we have
\begin{align*}
\frac{BD}{\sin\angle{BAD}}=\frac{BF}{\sin\angle{BDF}}
&=\frac{BF}{\sin(\angle{BAD}-\angle{FBK})}\\
&=\frac{BK}{\cos\angle{FBK}\sin(\angle{BAD}-\angle{FBK})}.
\end{align*}By symmetry,
\begin{align*}
\frac{BC}{\sin\angle{BAD}}=\frac{BC}{\sin\angle{BAC}}
&=\frac{BN}{\cos\angle{EBN}\sin(\angle{BAC}-\angle{EBN})}\\
&=\frac{BN}{\cos\angle{EBN}\sin(\angle{BAD}+\angle{EBN})}.
\end{align*}Thus $NM\|BD$ gives us
\[1=\frac{CN}{CB}+\frac{BN}{BC}=\frac{NM}{BD}+\frac{BN}{BC}=\frac{BK}{BD}+\frac{BN}{BC},\]whence plugging in and simplifying yields
\[\cos(\angle{FBK}+\angle{EBN})\sin(\angle{BAD}-\angle{FBK}+\angle{EBN})=0.\]But
\[0=\sin(\angle{BAD}-\angle{FBK}+\angle{EBN})=\sin(180^\circ-\angle{BCE}-\angle{KBF})\]is impossible since $0<\angle{BCE},\angle{KBF}<90^\circ$. Thus $\angle{FBK}+\angle{EBN}=90^\circ$, as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Zhero
2043 posts
#9 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
All lengths and angles in this proof will be directed.

Lemma 1: $\triangle CEN \sim \triangle FDK$.
Proof: Let $FK$ intersect $S_2$ at $F'$. Note that $F'K \perp BD$, $\frac{DK}{KB} = \frac{DM}{MC} = \frac{BN}{NC}$, and $\angle BF'D = \angle BAD = \angle BEC$, so $\triangle ECB \sim \triangle F'BD$. Hence, $\angle ECN = \angle ECB = \angle F'BD = \angle F'FD = \angle KFD$, and $\angle FKD = \angle CNE = 90^{\circ}$, so $\triangle CEN \sim \triangle FDK$.

Lemma 2: $\frac{DM}{MC} \cdot \frac{CE}{EB} \cdot \frac{BF}{FD} = 1$.
Proof: Let $\theta = \angle CAB$ and $\alpha = \angle NEC$. It is easy to see that $\angle ECB = 90^{\circ} - \alpha$, $\angle BEN = 180^{\circ} - \theta - \alpha$, $\angle CBE = \theta + \alpha - 90^{\circ}$, $\angle BDF = \alpha$ (by lemma 1), and $\angle FBD = 180^{\circ} - \theta - \alpha$. Hence,
\begin{align*}
\frac{DM}{MC} \cdot \frac{CE}{EB} \cdot \frac{BD}{FD} 
&=  \frac{DM}{MC} \cdot \frac{\sin(\theta + \alpha - 90^{\circ})}{\sin(90^{\circ} - \alpha)} \cdot \frac{\sin \alpha}{\sin(180^{\circ} - \theta - \alpha)}  \\
&= \frac{DM}{MC} \cdot \frac{- \cos(\theta + \alpha) \sin \alpha }{ \sin(\theta + \alpha) \cos \alpha }\\
&= \frac{DM}{MC} \cdot \frac{-\cot(\alpha + \theta)}{\cot \alpha} \\
&= \frac{DM}{MC} \cdot \frac{ \cot(180^{\circ} - \theta - \alpha) }{\cot \alpha} \\
&= \frac{DM}{MC} \cdot \frac{ \cot \angle BEN }{ \cot \angle NEB } \\
&= \frac{DM}{MC} \cdot \frac{CN}{NB} \\
&= 1.
\end{align*}


We have $\angle EAF = \angle EAB + \angle BAF = \angle ECB + \angle BDF = \angle ECN + \angle KDF = 90^{\circ}$, since $\triangle CEN \sim \triangle FDK$. Hence, it is sufficient to show that $AMFE$ is cyclic.

Consider an inversion about $A$ with radius 1. For any point $X$, let $X'$ denote the image of $X$ under this inversion. We wish to show that $E'$, $F'$, and $M'$ are collinear. $E'$ lies on $B'C'$ and $F'$ lies on $B'D'$, so by Menelaus's theorem, it is sufficient to show
\[ \frac{C'E'}{E'B'} \cdot \frac{B'F'}{F'D'} \cdot \frac{D'M'}{M'C'} = -1. \]
Note that
\begin{align*} \frac{C'E'}{E'B'} = \frac{CE \cdot C'A \cdot E'A }{EB \cdot E'A \cdot B'A} = \frac{CE}{EB} \cdot \frac{BA}{CA} \tag{1} \end{align*}
and
\begin{align*} \frac{B'F'}{F'D'} = \frac{BF \cdot B'A \cdot F'A }{FD \cdot F'A \cdot D'A} = \frac{BF}{FD} \cdot \frac{DA}{BA} \tag{2} \end{align*}
Let $CD$ intersect the line at infinity at $\infty$. We have $(M, \infty; C, D) = \frac{MC}{MD}$. Because cross-ratios are preserved under inversion, we have
\[ \frac{MC}{MD} = (M', A; C', D') = \frac{\frac{M'C'}{M'D'}}{\frac{AC'}{AD'}}, \]
or
\begin{align*} \frac{D'M'}{M'C'} = \frac{DM}{MC} \cdot \frac{AC}{AD}. \tag{3} \end{align*}
Combining (1), (2), (3), and lemma 2, we have
\begin{align*}
\frac{C'E'}{E'B'} \cdot \frac{B'F'}{F'D'} \cdot \frac{D'M'}{M'C'} 
&= \left( \frac{CE}{EB} \cdot \frac{BA}{BC} \right) \cdot \left(\frac{BF}{FD} \cdot \frac{DA}{BA} \right) \cdot \left( \frac{DM}{MC} \cdot \frac{AC}{AD} \right) \\
&= \left( \frac{CE}{EB} \cdot \frac{BF}{FD} \cdot \frac{DM}{MC} \right) \cdot \left( \frac{BA}{BC} \cdot \frac{DA}{BA} \cdot \frac{AC}{AD} \right) \\
&= -1, 
\end{align*}
as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
jgnr
1343 posts
#10 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247, and 1 other user
Click to reveal hidden text
Attachments:
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by jgnr, Jul 12, 2013, 12:33 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
SnowEverywhere
801 posts
#11 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Solution

Let $X$ be the point such that $E$ and $X$ are on opposite sides of $BC$ and $\triangle{CXB} \sim \triangle{DFB}$. First note that since $C$, $A$ and $D$ are collinear, $\angle{CXB}=\angle{DFB}=\angle{CAB}=180^\circ - \angle{CEB}$. Therefore $XBEC$ is cyclic. Let $X'$ be the point on $S_1$ such that $XX' \| BC$ and let $Y$ and $Y'$ be the projections of $X$ and $X'$, respectively, onto $BC$.

Now note that since the sides of $\triangle{MNC}$ and $\triangle{DKM}$ are parallel, it follows that

\[\frac{CN}{NB}=\frac{BK}{KD}=\frac{BY}{YC}=\frac{CY'}{BY'}\]
since $BXX'C$ is an isosceles trapezoid and $DFBK$, $CXBY$ and $BX'CY'$ are similar. The above equality implies that $Y'=N$ and therefore that $X'$ lies on $EN$. Since $BXX'C$ is an isosceles trapezoid, it follows that $BX=X'C$ and that $EX$ is the reflection of $EX'$ around the bisector of $\angle{CEB}$. Since the orthocenter of $\triangle{CEB}$, which lies on $EX'$ since $EX' \perp BC$, and the circumcenter of $\triangle{CEB}$ are isogonal conjugates, $EX$ is a diameter of $S_1$. This implies that

\[\angle{DBF}=\angle{CBX}=90^\circ - \angle{CBE}=\angle{NEB}\]
Therefore $\triangle{NEB} \sim \triangle{KBF}$ which implies that

\[\frac{EN}{KB} = \frac{BK}{KF} \quad \Rightarrow \quad \frac{EN}{NM}=\frac{MK}{KF}\]
since $MNBK$ is a parallelogram. This also implies that $\angle{MNE}=\angle{MKF}=90^\circ +\angle{CBD}$. Hence $\triangle{MNE} \sim \triangle{FKM}$ which implies that

\[\angle{EMF}=\angle{NMK}+\angle{EMN}+\angle{MFK}=\angle{CBD}+\angle{EMN}+\angle{MEN}=90^\circ\]
Hence $\angle{EMF}=90^\circ$ as desired. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ThinkFlow
1415 posts
#12 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Here is my proof. I hope I didn't make mistakes in using directed angles.

My Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sjaelee
485 posts
#13 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Rijul saini
904 posts
#14 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
We first prove that $\angle EBC + \angle FBD = 90^{\circ}$, and $\angle ECB + \angle FDB = 90^{\circ}$.
Proof of the previous assertion

Now, this directly implies that $\angle EAF = \angle EAB + \angle BAF = \angle ECB + \angle FDB = 90^{\circ}$. So, we only need to prove that $E,M,A,F$ are concyclic.

Now, let $X = MK \cap EB$. Then $\angle XMA = \angle ACB = \angle AEB = \angle AEX$, hence $M,A,X,E$ are concyclic.

Now, using the fact that $\triangle EBN \sim \triangle BFK$, we get \[\frac{EB}{BF} = \frac{BN}{FK} = \frac{MK}{KF}\] Combining with $\angle EBF = \angle MKF$, we get $\triangle MKF \sim \triangle EBF$.

Thus, $\angle XEF = \angle XMF$, which gives $X,A,M,E,F$ concyclic, and we're done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pi37
2079 posts
#15 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Let $E_1$, $F_1$ be the antipodes of $E,F$ with respect to their corresponding circles. It's not hard to see that the spiral similarity centered about $B$ sending $BC\cup S_1$ to $BD\cup S_2$ also sends $E_1$ to $F$ and $E$ to $F_1$. Therefore $A,E_1,F$ are collinear and $\angle EAF=90^\circ$. Now note that
\[
\frac{BN}{CN} = \frac{\cot\angle EBN}{\cot \angle ECN} = \frac{\sin \angle ECN}{\sin \angle EBN}\cdot \frac{\sin \angle CBE_1}{\sin \angle BCE_1} = (E,E_1;C,B)=(AE,AF;CD,AB)
\]Now $\frac{BN}{CN}=\frac{DM}{CM}$. Consider an inversion about $A$, which maps $E,F$ to points $E',F'$ on lines $B'C'$ and $B'D'$. We want to show that $E',F',$ and $M'$ are collinear. But
\[
(C',D';A,M')=\frac{DM}{CM}=(AE,AF;CD,AB)=(AE',AF';C'D',AB')=(E',F';AB' \cap E'F', C'D' \cap E'F') = (C',D';A,C'D' \cap E'F')
\]so $C'D'$ meets $E'F'$ at $M'$, as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ABCDE
1963 posts
#16 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Probably the easiest G8

Let $EN$ intersect the circumcircle of $BCE$ again at $E'$, $EF'$ be a diameter of the circumcircle of $BCE$, and let $K'$ be the foot of the altitude from $F'$ to $BC$. Note that $BN=CK'$ and $E'N=F'K'$. Note that $\angle BF'C=\angle BAC=180-\angle BAD=\angle BFD$. Since $\frac{BK'}{K'C}=\frac{CN}{NB}=\frac{CM}{MD}=\frac{BK}{KD}$, $BF'CK'$ and $BFDK$ are similar. Now, note that $\frac{EN}{NC}=\frac{BN}{NE'}=\frac{CK'}{K'F'}=\frac{DK}{KF}$, and multiplying both sides by $\frac{BC}{BD}$ we have that $\frac{EN}{NM}=\frac{MK}{KF}$. Since $\angle ENM=\angle MKF=90+\angle CBD$, triangles $NEM$ and $KMF$ are similar. But since $MK\parallel BC\perp EN$ and $MN\parallel BC\perp FK$, $ME\perp MF$ as desired.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by ABCDE, May 19, 2016, 2:21 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mcdonalds106_7
1138 posts
#17 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
Let $EN$ intersect $S_1$ again at $E'$. Note that $\angle CE'B=\angle CAB=\angle DFB$, and $\dfrac{DK}{KB}=\dfrac{BN}{NC}$. This implies that $\triangle DFB\sim \triangle BE'C$, which you can see by fixing $B$ and $C$ on a circle and varying $A$ along an arc; clearly $\dfrac{BH}{HC}$ determines the location of $A$ where $H$ is the foot of the altitude from $A$. Then, $\angle FBD=\angle E'CB=90-\angle CBE\implies \dfrac{FK}{KB}=\dfrac{BN}{NE}\implies \dfrac{FK}{MN}=\dfrac{KM}{NE}$. Since $\angle FKM=90+\angle DKM=90+\angle MNC=\angle MNE$, so $\triangle ENM\sim \triangle MKE$. Then $\angle FME=\angle FMK+\angle KMN+\angle NME=\angle FMK+\angle DKM+\angle NFK=180-\angle FND=90$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
jred
290 posts
#18 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
The problem itself is not hard. However, we must point out that the claim is true only when $A$ lies on segment $CD$. Otherwise, either $E$ or $F$ should lie on the arc containing $A$ to keep the claim true.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AlastorMoody
2125 posts
#19 • 1 Y
Y by Adventure10
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
awesomeming327.
1698 posts
#20
Y by
2001 G8 was easier

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/855230423172907008/954945615563989062/Screen_Shot_2022-03-19_at_8.32.51_PM.png
Note that $\frac{DK}{KM}=\frac{MN}{NC}$ so $\frac{DK}{KB}=\frac{BN}{NC}.$ Extend $FK$ to intersect $S_2$ at $H.$ Note that $\angle BHD=\angle BAD=\angle CEB.$ Let the transformation $S$ be from $C,B$ to $B,D$ respectively consisting of one reflection, preserving all angles and, by extension, length ratios. $N$ goes to $K$ and so the line $EN$ goes to the line $HK.$ Since $\angle CEB=\angle BHD,$ $E$ goes to $H.$

Thus, $\angle NBE=\angle HDB=\angle KFB.$ Therefore, $\angle NBE+\angle KBF=90^\circ.$ This implies that $\triangle NBE\sim\triangle KFB$ so $\frac{NE}{MK}=\frac{MK}{KF}.$ Additionally, by angle chasing $\angle MNE=\angle FKM$ so $\triangle MNE\sim\triangle FKM.$ Now, $\angle NME+\angle KMF=90^\circ-\angle MKB=\angle NMK-90^\circ,$ so we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
JAnatolGT_00
559 posts
#21 • 1 Y
Y by Mango247
Let $FK$ meet $S_2$ again at $G,G'$ is reflection of $G$ across perpendicular bisector of $BD.$
Obviously $\measuredangle MNE=\measuredangle FKM$ and $|BN|:|NC|=|DM|:|MC|=|DK|:|KB|,$ so by spiral similarity $$BEC\stackrel{+}{\sim} BG'D\stackrel{-}{\sim} BGD\implies BNE\stackrel{+}{\sim} FKB\implies \frac{|MN|}{|FK|}=\frac{|BK|}{|FK|}=\frac{|EN|}{|BN|}=\frac{|EN|}{|KM|}\implies$$$$\implies MNE\stackrel{+}{\sim} FKM\implies \measuredangle EMF=\angle (EN,MK)=\angle (EN,BC)=90^\circ \text{ } \blacksquare$$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by JAnatolGT_00, Jul 21, 2022, 1:21 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
starchan
1605 posts
#22
Y by
nice problem
solution
remark
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a