ka April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.
WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.
Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!
Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29
Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Intermediate: Grades 8-12
Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Several line segments parallel to the sides of a rectangular sheet of paper were drawn on it. These segments divided the sheet into several rectangles, inside of which there are no drawn lines. Petya wants to draw one diagonal in each of the rectangles, dividing it into two triangles, and color each triangle either black or white. Is it always possible to do this in such a way that no two triangles of the same color share a segment of their boundary?
Killer NT that nobody solved (also my hardest NT ever created)
mshtand11
Nan hour ago
by YaoAOPS
Source: Ukraine IMO 2025 TST P8
A positive integer number is chosen. Prove that there exists a prime number that divides infinitely many terms of the sequence , where Proposed by Arsenii Nikolaev and Mykhailo Shtandenko
I previously proved that there is such that its Fourier series diverges at . There is nothing special about the point , it was just for convenience. The same proof showed that for every , there is such that the Fourier series of diverges at , not to show.
My question to prove:
(a) Let be a Banach space and for every we have a normed space . Suppose that for every there is and such that Show that is of second category. (I am given the hint to write as and show that is of first category.)
(b) Let . Show that there is such that the Fourier series of diverges at for all . (I'm given the hint to use part a) with where
Given a n*n matrix A, prove that there exists a matrix B such that ABA = A
Solution: I have submitted the attachment
The answer is too symbol dense for me to understand the answer. What I have undertood:
There is use of direct product in the orthogonal decomposition. The decomposition is made with kernel and some T (which the author didn't mention) but as per orthogonal decomposition it must be its orthogonal complement.
Can anyone explain the answer in much much more detail with less use of symbols ( you can also use symbols but clearly define it).
Q) let and then is this uniformly convergence on comment on uniformly convergence on where in general it is should be uniformly convergence.
My I am trying with some contradicton method like chose and trying to solve
Next take a in (0,1) and chose a= 2^1/N but not solution
How to solve like this way help.
Is this is a good approach or any simple way please prefer.
Let be a -dimensional inner product space of column vectors, where for and , the inner product of and is defined as For , define a linear transformation on as follows: Given satisfying let . Then the dimension of the linear space formed by all linear transformations satisfying is
Audrey deposited into a 3-year certificate of deposit that earned 10% annual interest, compounded annually. Audrey made no additional deposits to or withdrawals from the certificate of deposit. What was the value of the certificate of deposit at the end of the 3-year period?
Any idea?? Diff equational system combined with Matrix theory.
Consider the equation dX/dt=X^2, where X(t) is an n×n matrix satisfying the condition detX=0. It is known that there are no solutions of this equation defined on a bounded interval, but there exist non-continuable solutions defined on unbounded intervals of the form (t ,+∞) and (−∞,t). Find n.
Quite an interesting question. Here's my partial solution:
Make x=0, y=-f(0), then we will have f(f(0)-f(0))+0f(-f(0))=f(0*-f(0)-f(0))+f(0).
Which means f(-f(0))=0
Make x=-f(0),y=0, then we will have f(0)^2=0, f(0)=0
Make y=0, then we will know f(f(x))=f(x)
(not sure about the rest)
Y byTintarn, Deadline, Tellocan, math_comb01, Beeoin
This problem is proposed by me. Hope you all enjoyed it!
Official Solution
Let denote the assertion of the given functional equation.
Claim 1: Proof: Note that and gives us the following: Consider the first expression. Plugging in it yields: If we denote , then we have . Plugging in the second expression gives us: This either means that or . In both cases, the claim is proved.
Since , the second expression becomes \hfill (*)
Claim 2: or for all real numbers Proof: Consider : Replacing by and using (*) leads to: Suppose that there does not exist such that , then for all real numbers . Otherwise as desired.
Claim 3: If , then \Proof: Suppose for some real number . Then gives us: On the other hand leads us to the following: Taking from both sides in the last relation and using (*) leads to: This proves the claim.
To finish the problem, consider : Setting gives us: From Claim 3 we obtain that . Now looking at and replacing by , we get that: On the other hand, , the previous relation and (*) give us the following: Thus, the only possible functions that satisfy the given relation are and . It is easy to check that they indeed work.
Let be the assertion
Clearly is a solution, so let us assume that is not identically zero.
Let
Then
So because is not zero everywhere.
Let
So if then we have the must be the identity.
Let us assume that
But then contradiction.
Thus, and it follows that is the only other solution.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by tadpoleloop, Nov 11, 2023, 9:02 PM
Let denote the given assertion.
Since is a solution, suppose that is not always 0. for all
If , then Let there be some real number s.t. . Then Let there be some real number s.t. . This is impossible as and yielding Taking on both sides, we get , a contradiction.
The finishing steps are the same as the official solution.
We claim that the two solutions are and , which we confirm are solutions. Let denote the given assertion, and let . Then, gives us . Using this, we can deduce that So, gives us Now, gives us , labelled (1). Then, we can force and to cancel with , which using (1) gives us Since is one of our claimed solutions, assume otherwise that . gives us . Using this and (1) to simplify we get that So, , which in turn gives us . gives us . By induction, this becomes for all integers . Now, for any integer , using (2) on gives us Finally, for any integer , using (1), (2), and (3) on gives us So, no solutions exist other than and .
Denote as the assertion of the following F.E.
By we get , now by we get which gives .
Now gives , gives , and for by we get . Since is a solution suppose there exists s.t. then by here we get and by we get , now by indooks we get for any integer so in the previous equation set to be to get that , also remember that and now follow directly. From we get so if then we get for all reals .
So suppose otherwise that then but this means which contradicts .
Therefore the only solutions to this F.E. are and for all reals , thus done
Let be the assertion .
P(x,f(-1))\Rightarrow f(xf(-1))=xf(-1)f(-1)\ne0\boxed{f(x)=x}P(f(x),1)\Rightarrow f(x)f(1)=f(x)4
So if we have the solution , which fits. Otherwise:
So no more solutions.