Summer is a great time to explore cool problems to keep your skills sharp!  Schedule a class today!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a June Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Jun 2, 2025
Congratulations to all the mathletes who competed at National MATHCOUNTS! If you missed the exciting Countdown Round, you can watch the video at this link. Are you interested in training for MATHCOUNTS or AMC 10 contests? How would you like to train for these math competitions in half the time? We have accelerated sections which meet twice per week instead of once starting on July 8th (7:30pm ET). These sections fill quickly so enroll today!

[list][*]MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
[*]MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
[*]AMC 10 Problem Series[/list]
For those interested in Olympiad level training in math, computer science, physics, and chemistry, be sure to enroll in our WOOT courses before August 19th to take advantage of early bird pricing!

Summer camps are starting this month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have a transformative summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]June 5th, Thursday, 7:30pm ET: Open Discussion with Ben Kornell and Andrew Sutherland, Art of Problem Solving's incoming CEO Ben Kornell and CPO Andrew Sutherland host an Ask Me Anything-style chat. Come ask your questions and get to know our incoming CEO & CPO!
[*]June 9th, Monday, 7:30pm ET, Game Jam: Operation Shuffle!, Come join us to play our second round of Operation Shuffle! If you enjoy number sense, logic, and a healthy dose of luck, this is the game for you. No specific math background is required; all are welcome.[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29
Sunday, Aug 17 - Dec 14
Tuesday, Aug 26 - Dec 16
Friday, Sep 5 - Jan 16
Monday, Sep 8 - Jan 12
Tuesday, Sep 16 - Jan 20 (4:30 - 5:45 pm ET/1:30 - 2:45 pm PT)
Sunday, Sep 21 - Jan 25
Thursday, Sep 25 - Jan 29
Wednesday, Oct 22 - Feb 25
Tuesday, Nov 4 - Mar 10
Friday, Dec 12 - Apr 10

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21
Sunday, Aug 17 - Dec 14
Tuesday, Sep 9 - Jan 13
Thursday, Sep 25 - Jan 29
Sunday, Oct 19 - Feb 22
Monday, Oct 27 - Mar 2
Wednesday, Nov 12 - Mar 18

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Sunday, Aug 17 - Dec 14
Wednesday, Aug 27 - Dec 17
Friday, Sep 5 - Jan 16
Thursday, Sep 11 - Jan 15
Sunday, Sep 28 - Feb 1
Monday, Oct 6 - Feb 9
Tuesday, Oct 21 - Feb 24
Sunday, Nov 9 - Mar 15
Friday, Dec 5 - Apr 3

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 2 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Monday, Aug 11 - Nov 3
Wednesday, Sep 3 - Nov 19
Sunday, Sep 21 - Dec 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Friday, Oct 3 - Jan 16
Tuesday, Nov 4 - Feb 10
Sunday, Dec 7 - Mar 8

Introduction to Number Theory
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Wednesday, Aug 13 - Oct 29
Friday, Sep 12 - Dec 12
Sunday, Oct 26 - Feb 1
Monday, Dec 1 - Mar 2

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Thursday, Aug 7 - Nov 20
Monday, Aug 18 - Dec 15
Sunday, Sep 7 - Jan 11
Thursday, Sep 11 - Jan 15
Wednesday, Sep 24 - Jan 28
Sunday, Oct 26 - Mar 1
Tuesday, Nov 4 - Mar 10
Monday, Dec 1 - Mar 30

Introduction to Geometry
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Wednesday, Aug 13 - Feb 11
Tuesday, Aug 26 - Feb 24
Sunday, Sep 7 - Mar 8
Thursday, Sep 11 - Mar 12
Wednesday, Sep 24 - Mar 25
Sunday, Oct 26 - Apr 26
Monday, Nov 3 - May 4
Friday, Dec 5 - May 29

Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
Friday, Aug 8 - Feb 20
Tuesday, Aug 26 - Feb 24
Sunday, Sep 28 - Mar 29
Wednesday, Oct 8 - Mar 8
Sunday, Nov 16 - May 17
Thursday, Dec 11 - Jun 4

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2
Sunday, Sep 28 - Feb 15
Tuesday, Nov 4 - Mar 24

Intermediate Number Theory
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3
Wednesday, Sep 24 - Dec 17

Precalculus
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Jan 21
Tuesday, Sep 9 - Feb 24
Sunday, Sep 21 - Mar 8
Monday, Oct 20 - Apr 6
Sunday, Dec 14 - May 31

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17
Sunday, Sep 7 - Mar 15
Wednesday, Sep 24 - Apr 1
Friday, Nov 14 - May 22

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
Sunday, Aug 17 - Nov 9
Wednesday, Sep 3 - Nov 19
Tuesday, Sep 16 - Dec 9
Sunday, Sep 21 - Dec 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Oct 6 - Jan 12
Thursday, Oct 16 - Jan 22
Tues, Thurs & Sun, Dec 9 - Jan 18 (meets three times a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
Sunday, Aug 17 - Nov 9
Tuesday, Aug 26 - Nov 11
Thursday, Sep 4 - Nov 20
Friday, Sep 12 - Dec 12
Monday, Sep 15 - Dec 8
Sunday, Oct 5 - Jan 11
Tues, Thurs & Sun, Dec 2 - Jan 11 (meets three times a week!)
Mon, Wed & Fri, Dec 8 - Jan 16 (meets three times a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
Sunday, Aug 10 - Nov 2
Thursday, Aug 14 - Oct 30
Tuesday, Aug 19 - Nov 4
Mon & Wed, Sep 15 - Oct 22 (meets twice a week!)
Mon, Wed & Fri, Oct 6 - Nov 3 (meets three times a week!)
Tue, Thurs & Sun, Oct 7 - Nov 2 (meets three times a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
Friday, Aug 15 - Sep 12
Sunday, Sep 7 - Sep 28
Tuesday, Sep 9 - Sep 30
Monday, Sep 22 - Oct 13
Sunday, Sep 28 - Oct 19 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, Oct 8 - Oct 29
Thursday, Oct 9 - Oct 30

AMC 12 Problem Series
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Sunday, Aug 10 - Nov 2
Monday, Aug 18 - Nov 10
Mon & Wed, Sep 15 - Oct 22 (meets twice a week!)
Tues, Thurs & Sun, Oct 7 - Nov 2 (meets three times a week!)

AMC 12 Final Fives
Thursday, Sep 4 - Sep 25
Sunday, Sep 28 - Oct 19
Tuesday, Oct 7 - Oct 28

AIME Problem Series A
Thursday, Oct 23 - Jan 29

AIME Problem Series B
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tuesday, Sep 2 - Nov 18

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Tuesday, Sep 16 - Dec 9
Friday, Oct 17 - Jan 30

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Thursday, Aug 14 - Oct 30
Sunday, Sep 7 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Dec 2 - Mar 3

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Friday, Oct 3 - Jan 16

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1
Wednesday, Sep 3 - Dec 3
Thursday, Oct 30 - Feb 5
Tuesday, Dec 2 - Mar 3

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tuesday, Sep 2 - Nov 18
Sunday, Oct 5 - Jan 11
Wednesday, Dec 10 - Mar 11

Physics 1: Mechanics
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15
Sunday, Sep 21 - Mar 22
Sunday, Oct 26 - Apr 26

Relativity
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Jun 2, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
inequality
SunnyEvan   3
N a few seconds ago by SunnyEvan
Let $ a,b > 0 ,$ such that : $ a+b \geq \frac{3(a^4+b^4)}{a^2+b^2+1}\sqrt{\frac{\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}}{a+b}}.$
Prove that: $$ \frac{3(a^2+b^2)+4}{a^4+b^4} \geq 3(a+b)-1 $$
3 replies
SunnyEvan
Today at 6:53 AM
SunnyEvan
a few seconds ago
3x^2+x=4y^2+y - Iran NMO 1997 (Second Round) - Problem1
sororak   15
N 8 minutes ago by SomeonecoolLovesMaths
Let $x,y$ be positive integers such that $3x^2+x=4y^2+y$. Prove that $x-y$ is a perfect square.
15 replies
1 viewing
sororak
Oct 5, 2010
SomeonecoolLovesMaths
8 minutes ago
Indian Mathematical Olympiad 1990 - Problem 2
Leon   14
N 14 minutes ago by SomeonecoolLovesMaths
Determine all non-negative integral pairs $ (x, y)$ for which
\[ (xy - 7)^2 = x^2 + y^2.\]
14 replies
Leon
Aug 16, 2009
SomeonecoolLovesMaths
14 minutes ago
Difficult Set Problem
regiszhou   0
32 minutes ago
For $n$ different sets $A_1, A_2, \cdots, A_n$, define the function $f(A_1, A_2, \cdots, A_n)$ to be the maximum number $x$ such that there exists $x$ different sets in $A$ that satisfies: the union of any $2$ of them (the $x$ different sets) is not in the $x$ sets. AKA, no set in the chosen $x$ different sets can be expressed as the union of two sets in the chosen $x$ different sets.

For example, $f(\{1\}, \{2\}, \{3\})=3$, but $f(\{1\}, \{2\}, \{1, 2\})=2$ (since if you choose all three, $\{1\} \cup \{2\} = \{1, 2\}$).

Now let $g(n)$ for any positive integer $n$ be the minimum number of $f(A_1, A_2, \cdots, A_n)$ for ALL the different sets $(A_1, A_2, \cdots, A_n)$. Proof that $\sqrt{2n} - 1 \le g(n) \le 2 \sqrt{n} + 1$.
0 replies
regiszhou
32 minutes ago
0 replies
tangent circles
m4thbl3nd3r   1
N an hour ago by Lil_flip38
Let $O,H,T$ be circumcenter, orthocenter and A-HM point of triangle $ABC$. Let $AH,AT$ intersect $(O)$ at $K,N$, respectively. Let $XYZ$ be the triangle formed by $TH,BC,KN$. Prove that $(XYZ)$ is tangent to $(O).$
1 reply
m4thbl3nd3r
2 hours ago
Lil_flip38
an hour ago
inequality
SunnyEvan   8
N an hour ago by sqing
Let $ x,y \geq 0 ,$ such that : $ \frac{x^2}{x^3+y}+\frac{y^2}{x+y^3} \geq 1 .$
Prove that : $$ x^2+y^2-xy \leq x+y $$$$ (x+\frac{1}{2})^2+(x+\frac{1}{2})^2 \leq \frac{5}{2} $$$$ (x+1)^2+(y+1)^2 \leq 5 $$$$ (x+2)^2+(y+2)^2 \leq 13 $$
8 replies
SunnyEvan
Yesterday at 1:51 PM
sqing
an hour ago
Why did all the old Japanese math Olympiad questions disappear?
parkjungmin   0
an hour ago
Why did all the old Japanese math Olympiad questions disappear?

Did the administrator delete it?
0 replies
parkjungmin
an hour ago
0 replies
reals associated with 1024 points
bin_sherlo   2
N 2 hours ago by Tamam
Source: Türkiye 2025 JBMO TST P8
Pairwise distinct points $P_1,\dots,P_{1024}$, which lie on a circle, are marked by distinct reals $a_1,\dots,a_{1024}$. Let $P_i$ be $Q-$good for a $Q$ on the circle different than $P_1,\dots,P_{1024}$, if and only if $a_i$ is the greatest number on at least one of the two arcs $P_iQ$. Let the score of $Q$ be the number of $Q-$good points on the circle. Determine the greatest $k$ such that regardless of the values of $a_1,\dots,a_{1024}$, there exists a point $Q$ with score at least $k$.
2 replies
bin_sherlo
May 11, 2025
Tamam
2 hours ago
Complex number
soruz   2
N 2 hours ago by alexheinis
$i)$ Determine $z \in \mathbb{C} $ such that $2|z| \ge |z^n-3|, \forall n \in  \mathbb N^*.$
$ii)$ Determine $z \in \mathbb{C} $ such that $2|z| \ge |z^n+3|, \forall n \in  \mathbb N^*.$
2 replies
soruz
Nov 28, 2024
alexheinis
2 hours ago
Brilliant Problem
M11100111001Y1R   9
N 3 hours ago by The5
Source: Iran TST 2025 Test 3 Problem 3
Find all sequences \( (a_n) \) of natural numbers such that for every pair of natural numbers \( r \) and \( s \), the following inequality holds:
\[
\frac{1}{2} < \frac{\gcd(a_r, a_s)}{\gcd(r, s)} < 2
\]
9 replies
M11100111001Y1R
May 27, 2025
The5
3 hours ago
Draw sqrt(2024)
shanelin-sigma   1
N 3 hours ago by CrazyInMath
Source: 2024/12/24 TCFMSG Mock p10
On a big plane, two points with length $1$ are given. Prove that one can only use straightedge (which draws a straight line passing two drawn points) and compass (which draws a circle with a chosen radius equal to the distance of two drawn points and centered at a drawn points) to construct a line and two points on it with length $\sqrt{2024}$ in only $10$ steps (Namely, the total number of circles and straight lines drawn is at most $10$.)
1 reply
shanelin-sigma
Dec 24, 2024
CrazyInMath
3 hours ago
A beautiful Lemoine point problem
phonghatemath   3
N 3 hours ago by orengo42
Source: my teacher
Given triangle $ABC$ inscribed in a circle with center $O$. $P$ is any point not on (O). $AP, BP, CP$ intersect $(O)$ at $A', B', C'$. Let $L, L'$ be the Lemoine points of triangle $ABC, A'B'C'$ respectively. Prove that $P, L, L'$ are collinear.
3 replies
phonghatemath
Today at 5:01 AM
orengo42
3 hours ago
Serbian selection contest for the IMO 2025 - P1
OgnjenTesic   4
N 3 hours ago by Mathgloggers
Source: Serbian selection contest for the IMO 2025
Let \( p \geq 7 \) be a prime number and \( m \in \mathbb{N} \). Prove that
\[\left| p^m - (p - 2)! \right| > p^2.\]Proposed by Miloš Milićev
4 replies
OgnjenTesic
May 22, 2025
Mathgloggers
3 hours ago
incircle with center I of triangle ABC touches the side BC
orl   40
N Apr 28, 2025 by Ilikeminecraft
Source: Vietnam TST 2003 for the 44th IMO, problem 2
Given a triangle $ABC$. Let $O$ be the circumcenter of this triangle $ABC$. Let $H$, $K$, $L$ be the feet of the altitudes of triangle $ABC$ from the vertices $A$, $B$, $C$, respectively. Denote by $A_{0}$, $B_{0}$, $C_{0}$ the midpoints of these altitudes $AH$, $BK$, $CL$, respectively. The incircle of triangle $ABC$ has center $I$ and touches the sides $BC$, $CA$, $AB$ at the points $D$, $E$, $F$, respectively. Prove that the four lines $A_{0}D$, $B_{0}E$, $C_{0}F$ and $OI$ are concurrent. (When the point $O$ concides with $I$, we consider the line $OI$ as an arbitrary line passing through $O$.)
40 replies
orl
Jun 26, 2005
Ilikeminecraft
Apr 28, 2025
incircle with center I of triangle ABC touches the side BC
G H J
Source: Vietnam TST 2003 for the 44th IMO, problem 2
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
orl
3647 posts
#1 • 5 Y
Y by HWenslawski, Adventure10, jhu08, Miku_, ehuseyinyigit
Given a triangle $ABC$. Let $O$ be the circumcenter of this triangle $ABC$. Let $H$, $K$, $L$ be the feet of the altitudes of triangle $ABC$ from the vertices $A$, $B$, $C$, respectively. Denote by $A_{0}$, $B_{0}$, $C_{0}$ the midpoints of these altitudes $AH$, $BK$, $CL$, respectively. The incircle of triangle $ABC$ has center $I$ and touches the sides $BC$, $CA$, $AB$ at the points $D$, $E$, $F$, respectively. Prove that the four lines $A_{0}D$, $B_{0}E$, $C_{0}F$ and $OI$ are concurrent. (When the point $O$ concides with $I$, we consider the line $OI$ as an arbitrary line passing through $O$.)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mecrazywong
606 posts
#2 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08
$A_0D\cap(I)$ is the tangency point of the circle passing through B,C tangent to the incircle.
Then we consider the Apollonian circles with the ratio s-a/s-b,etc. It's easy to prove they intersect at exactly 2 points.
The concurrency of $A_0D,B_0E,C_0F$ can be proved by radical axis.
The remaining is to show that I,O have the same power wrt the 3 Apollonian circles. For I it's easy; for O it's simple computation.

I know I have over-compressed the solution... :blush:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
darij grinberg
6555 posts
#3 • 6 Y
Y by tobash_co, Adventure10, jhu08, Miku_, Mango247, and 1 other user
You can find an alternative solution in Hyacinthos message #9551:
[url=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Hyacinthos/message/9551?expand=1]Hyacinthos message #9551[/url] (CORRECTED) wrote:
From: Darij Grinberg
Subject: Re: midpoints of AH, BK, CL

Dear Orlando,

In Hyacinthos message #9539, you wrote:
orl wrote:
Given a triangle $ ABC$ inscribed in a circle with center $ O$. Let $ H$, $ K$, $ L$ be the feet of the altitudes of triangle $ ABC$ from the vertices $ A$, $ B$, $ C$, respectively. Denote by $ A_{0}$, $ B_{0}$, $ C_{0}$ the midpoints of these altitudes $ AH$, $ BK$, $ CL$, respectively. The incircle of triangle $ ABC$ has center $ I$ and touches the sides $ BC$, $ CA$, $ AB$ at the points $ D$, $ E$, $ F$, respectively. Prove that the four lines $ A_{0}D$, $ B_{0}E$, $ C_{0}F$ and $ OI$ are concurrent. (When the point $ O$ concides with $ I$, we consider the line $ OI$ as an arbitrary line passing through $ O$.)

The first three lines $ A_{0}D$, $ B_{0}E$, $ C_{0}F$ pass through the excenters $ I_{a}$, $ I_{b}$, $ I_{c}$ of triangle ABC (proof: see below). Hence, these three lines coincide with the lines $ DI_{a}$, $ EI_{b}$, $ FI_{c}$, respectively. But triangles DEF and $ I_{a}I_{b}I_{c}$ are homothetic (since their corresponding sidelines are parallel, what can be easily seen); hence, the lines $ DI_{a}$, $ EI_{b}$, $ FI_{c}$ concur at the homothetic center T of the two triangles DEF and $ I_{a}I_{b}I_{c}$.

Now, O is the nine-point center of triangle $ I_{a}I_{b}I_{c}$, and I is the orthocenter of triangle $ I_{a}I_{b}I_{c}$. Hence, the circumcenter of triangle $ I_{a}I_{b}I_{c}$ is the reflection of the orthocenter in the nine-point center, i. e. the reflection of I in O.

Obviously, the circumcenter of triangle DEF is I.

Since the circumcenters of two homothetic triangles lie on one line with the homothetic center, it follows that the reflection of I in O and the point I lie on one line with the homothetic center T of triangles DEF and $ I_{a}I_{b}I_{c}$. In other words, the point T lies on the line OI.

Hence, altogether, the point T lies on the lines $ DI_{a}$, $ EI_{b}$, $ FI_{c}$ (i. e., on the lines $ A_{0}D$, $ B_{0}E$, $ C_{0}F$), and on the line OI. The proof is complete.

Two notes:

(1) In the above, I have left out the proof that the lines $ A_{0}D$, $ B_{0}E$, $ C_{0}F$ pass through the points $ I_{a}$, $ I_{b}$, $ I_{c}$.
Here is this proof:

The "semiprojection" of a point on a line will mean the midpoint between the point and its orthogonal projection on the line. Of course, if three points are collinear, their semiprojections on any line are collinear, too (in fact, point $ \mapsto$ its semiprojection on a given line is an affine mapping).

If D' is the point of tangency of the A-excircle of triangle ABC with the side BC, and D" is the point diametrically opposite to D' on the A-excircle, then the tangent to the A-excircle at D" is parallel to BC; hence, if this tangent meets AB and AC at B" and C", respectively, the triangles ABC and AB"C" are homothetic. The homothetic center of these two triangles is A, of course.

Now, the incircle of triangle ABC touches BC at D; the incircle of triangle AB"C" is the A-excircle of triangle ABC and touches B"C" at D". Hence, the points D and D" are collinear with the homothetic center A of the two triangles ABC and AB"C".

Now, since the points D, D" and A are collinear, the points D, $ I_{a}$, $ A_{0}$ - being their semiprojections on the line BC - are collinear, too, i. e. the line $ A_{0}D$ passes through $ I_{a}$. Similarly, the lines $ B_{0}E$ and $ C_{0}F$ pass through $ I_{b}$ and $ I_{c}$, respectively, qed..

(2) The point T is the triangle center X(57) in Kimberling's ETC; in fact, T is the isogonal conjugate of the Mitten point X(9).

Sincerely,
Darij Grinberg
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by darij grinberg, Jul 29, 2007, 3:13 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Remike
126 posts
#4 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247
darij grinberg wrote:
But triangles A0B0C0 and IaIbIc are homothetic (since their corresponding sidelines are parallel, what can be easily seen);

What????

This is obviously an incorrect statement (a counterexample can be constructed very easyly). May be you meant that triangles $DEF$ and $I_AI_BI_C$ are homothetic...
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
darij grinberg
6555 posts
#5 • 3 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247
Remike wrote:
What????

This is obviously an incorrect statement (a counterexample can be constructed very easyly). May be you meant that triangles $DEF$ and $I_AI_BI_C$ are homothetic...

Okay, I'm sorry, I confused some notations (mainly DEF and A0B0C0). Now it should be correct.

Darij
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Virgil Nicula
7054 posts
#6 • 4 Y
Y by Adventure10, jhu08, Mango247, ehuseyinyigit
Remark. The exincircles with the centers $I_a,\ I_b,\ I_c$ of the $\triangle ABC$ touch the sides $BC,\ CA,\ AB$ in the points $M,\ N,\ P$ respectively. Then $I\in MA_0\cap NB_0\cap PC_0.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
plane geometry
467 posts
#7 • 2 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10
Virgil Nicula wrote:
Remark. The exincircles with the centers $ I_a,\ I_b,\ I_c$ of the $ \triangle ABC$ touch the sides $ BC,\ CA,\ AB$ in the points $ M,\ N,\ P$ respectively. Then $ I\in MA_0\cap NB_0\cap PC_0.$
dear Virgil Nicula,do you have a proof for this nice problem?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Luis González
4151 posts
#8 • 4 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247, ehuseyinyigit
Virgil Nicula wrote:
Remark. The exincircles with the centers $I_a,\ I_b,\ I_c$ of the $\triangle ABC$ touch the sides $BC,\ CA,\ AB$ in the points $M,\ N,\ P$ respectively. Then $I\in MA_0\cap NB_0\cap PC_0.$
Basically, note that $ \triangle AA_0I \sim \triangle I_aMI \Longrightarrow \frac{AA_0}{r_a}=\frac{IA}{II_a}$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
mathVNpro
469 posts
#10 • 3 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
Let me restatement this problem so that it can fits my solution :lol: :
"let $ ABC$ be the acute triangle with incircle $ (I)$. Denote $ D$, $ E$, $ F$ the tagent points of $ (I)$ with $ BC$, $ CA$, $ AB$, respectively. Let $ A_1$, $ B_1$, $ C_1$ be the projections of $ A$, $ B$, $ C$ onto $ BC$, $ CA$, $ AB$, respectively. Suppose $ A_2$, $ B_2$, $ C_2$ are the midpoints of $ AA_1$, $ BB_1$, $ CC_1$, respectively.
Prove that: $ DA_2$, $ EB_2$, $ FC_2$, $ OI$ are concurent, where $ O$ is the circumcenter of triangle $ ABC$."

Proof:
Let $ X$ be the intersection of $ EF$ with $ BC$. It is well- known that $ (X,D,B,C) = - 1$ $ (1)$. Denote $ X'$ the intersection of $ AD$ with $ EF$. From $ (1)$, we also get that $ (X,X',E,F) = - 1$. Therefore $ X$ is the pole of $ AD$ wrt $ (I)$. Hence, $ IX$ is perpendicular to $ AD$. It is easy to notice that triangle $ IXD$ is similar to triangle $ DAA_1$. Now, let me call $ A_3$ is the midpoint of $ XD$, from the notice above, we get, $ IA_3$ is also perpendicular to $ DA_2$. Therefore, $ A_3$ is the pole of $ DA_2$ wrt $ (I)$. Define the same for $ B_3$, $ C_3$.
So now, in order to prove $ DA_2$, $ EB_2$, $ FC_2$ are concurent, we need to prove that $ A_3$, $ B_3$, $ C_3$ are collinear.
Indeed, because, $ (X,D,B,C) = - 1$, $ A_3$ is the midpoint of $ XD$, we get, $ A_3D^2 = \overline {A_3B}.\overline {A_3C}$, which also means that the power of $ A_3$ wrt $ (I)$ and $ (ABC)$ are equal. With the same argument for $ B_3$, $ C_3$. Hence, $ (A_3B_3C_3)$ is the radical axis wrt $ (I)$ and $ (ABC)$, further, $ A_3$, $ B_3$, $ C_3$ are collinear. As the result, $ DA_2$, $ EB_2$, $ FC_2$ are concurent.
Let $ P$ be the intersection of these lines, we get that, $ P$ is the pole of $ (A_3B_3C_3)$ wrt $ (I)$. Therefore, $ IP$ is perpendicular to $ (A_3B_3C_3)$. $ OI$ is also perpendicular to $ (A_3B_3C_3)$ (Because $ (A_3B_3C_3)$ is the radical axis wrt $ (I)$ and $ (ABC)$), where $ O$ is the circumcenter of triangle $ ABC$. Hence, $ O,I,P$ are collinear. Which leads to the result that $ DA_2$, $ EB_2$, $ FC_2$, $ OI$ are concurent.
Our proof is completed.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6882 posts
#11 • 7 Y
Y by Durjoy1729, HamstPan38825, jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247, and 2 other users
Here is a solution combining projective geometry and homogeneous/barycentric coordinates. The calculations fit on two pages when I performed them by hand.

[asy]import graph; size(12cm); real lsf=0.5; pathpen=linewidth(0.7); pointpen=black; pen fp=fontsize(10); pointfontpen=fp; real xmin=-10.98,xmax=12.96,ymin=-6.14,ymax=7.52; 
pen zzttqq=rgb(0.6,0.2,0), qqttff=rgb(0,0.2,1), zzzzzz=rgb(0.6,0.6,0.6), zzzzqq=rgb(0.6,0.6,0), qqzzzz=rgb(0,0.6,0.6), aqgreen=rgb(0,0.4,0.4); 
pair A=(-1.88,-3), B=(9.12,-3), C=(0.12,6), L=(0.12,-3), O=(3.62,0.5), I=(1.86,0), L_C=(-8.78,-3), C_0=(0.12,1.5), F=(1.86,-3), P=(0.81,-0.29), P_C=(1.11,-3), K_C=(2.74,-3); 
D(A--B--C--cycle,zzttqq); 
D(A--B,zzttqq); D(B--C,zzttqq); D(C--A,zzttqq); D(CR(I,3),linetype("4 4")+qqttff); D(C--L,zzzzzz); D(C_0--F,zzzzqq); D(O--L_C,linewidth(1.2)+green); D(C--P_C,qqzzzz); D(L_C--A); D(C--K_C,qqzzzz); D(F--I,linetype("0 3 4 3")+zzzzzz); D(CR(O,6.52),linewidth(1.3)+aqgreen); 
D(A); MP("A",(-1.81,-2.89),SW*lsf); D(B); MP("B",(9.2,-2.89),SE*lsf); D(C); MP("C",(0.19,6.12),NW*lsf); D(L); MP("L",(0.07,-3.52),NE*lsf); D(O); MP("O",(3.69,0.62),NE*lsf); D(I); MP("I",(1.95,0.13),NE*lsf); D(L_C); MP("L_C",(-8.98,-2.79),NE*lsf); D(C_0); MP("C_0",(0.19,1.62),NE*lsf); D(F); MP("F",(1.91,-3.48),NE*lsf); D(P); MP("P",(0.89,-0.17),NE*lsf); D(P_C); MP("P_C",(0.99,-3.42),NE*lsf); D(K_C); MP("K_C",(2.73,-3.44),NE*lsf); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle);  [/asy]

Let $P = C_0F \cap IO$, $L_C = IO \cap AB$ and $K_C = AI \cap AB$. Define $P_C = AP \cap AB$. Let $C_\infty$ be a point at infinity on line $AL$. Our goal is to compute the barycentric coordinates of $P_C$ with respect to $\triangle ABC$.

We know that $K_C = (a:b:0)$ and $F = (s-b: s-a: 0)$. The coordinates of $L_C$ can be computed and simplified using the identities $aS_A - cS_C = s(c-a)(s-b)$, $I=(a:b:c)$ and $O=(a^2S_A: b^2S_B: c^2S_C)$ as \begin{align*}
	L_C &= \left( \det \left[ \begin{array}{cc} a^2S_A & c^2S_C \\ a & c \end{array}\right] : 
		\det \left[ \begin{array}{cc} b^2S_B & c^2S_C \\ b & c \end{array} \right] : 
			0\right) \\
	&= \left( a(aS_A - cS_C) : b(bS_B - cS_C) : 0 \right) \\
	&= \left( a(a-c)(s-b) : b(b-c)(s-a) : 0 \right)
\end{align*}
Now, note that $(C,L; C_{\infty}, C_0) = -1$ is a harmonic bundle. Taking a perspective at $F$ with onto line $IO$, we see that $(CF \cap IO, L_C; I, P) = -1$ is a harmonic bundle. Taking perspective at $C$ onto line $AB$, we see that $(F, L_C; K_C, P_C) = -1$. There's a lemma that states that if we have $K_C = F+L_C$ when adding componentwise, then $P_C = -F + L_C$. So, we want to find a real $r$ such that \[ \frac{r(s-b) + a(a-c)(s-b)}{r(s-a) + b(b-c)(s-a)} = \frac{a}{b} \] because this will give us the coordinates of $P_C$ for free. Solving for $r$ (this is the hardest part), \begin{align*}
	r( b(s-b) - a(s-a) ) &= ab( (b-c)(s-a) - (a-c)(s-b) ) \\
	\implies r(a-b)(s-c) &= \frac{1}{2} ab( (b-c)(b+c-a) - (a-c)(a+c-b) ) \\
	&= \frac{1}{2} ab( (b^2-c^2)-(a^2-c^2) + b(a-c) - a(b-c) ) \\
	&= ab(b-a)(b+c-a) \\
	\implies r &= -ab
\end{align*}
So what of $P_C$? We get \[
	\frac{-r(s-b) + a(a-c)(s-b)}{-r(s-a) + b(b-c)(s-a) } = \frac{ab(s-b) + a(a-c)(s-b)}{ab(s-a) + b(b-c)(s-a) } = \frac{a(s-b)}{b(s-a)}. \] Hence, $P_C = (a(s-b) : b(s-a) : 0)$.

If we define $P_A$ and $P_B$ analogously, we see that they concur at the point \[ P = (a(s-b)(s-c) : b(s-c)(s-a) : c(s-a)(s-b) ). \] It remains to show that this point actually lies on $IO$, which is surprisingly easy, as we have \[
\det \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} a^2S_A & b^2S_B & c^2S_C \\ a & b & c \\ a(s-b)(s-c) & b(s-c)(s-a) & c(s-a)(s-b) \end{array} \right] \] which simplifies as \[ \sum_{\text{cyc}} a(s-b)(s-c) \left( bc(bS_B - cS_C) \right) 
	= abc(s-a)(s-b)(s-c) \sum_{\text{cyc}} (b-c) 
	= 0. 
\] This implies the points are collinear, so we're done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Virgil Nicula
7054 posts
#12 • 3 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
Quote:
Remark. The exincircles with the centers $ I_a,\ I_b,\ I_c$ of the $ \triangle ABC$ touch the sides $ BC,\ CA,\ AB$ in the points $ M,\ N,\ P$ respectively. Then $ I\in MA_0\cap NB_0\cap PC_0.$
$I\in MA_0\iff$ $\frac {ID}{A_0H}=\frac{MD}{MH}\iff$ $\frac{r}{\frac {h_a}{2}}=\frac {|b-c|}{\frac {s|b-c|}{a}}\iff$ $\frac {2r}{h_a}=\frac as\iff$ $2sr=ah_a(=2S)$ O.K.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
thecmd999
2860 posts
#13 • 5 Y
Y by jhu08, guptaamitu1, Adventure10, Mango247, ehuseyinyigit
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
jayme
9805 posts
#14 • 3 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
Dear Mathlinkers,
also a link

http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=497757

Sincerely
Jean-Louis
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Stranger8
238 posts
#15 • 3 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
I use Three line Coordinates maybe this way is similar to Evan chen's solution,but still....
I use $A$ $B$ $C$ to represent the $cosA$ $cosB$ $cosC$
because $A_0$ is the midpoint of the altitudes $AH$,then we can get $A_0$ $(1,C,B)$ ,and we can get $D$$(0,1+C,1+B)$
then line $A_0D$ is $(C-B,-1-B,1+C)$ similarily we can get line $B_0E$ is $(1+A,A-C,-1-C)$ and line $C_0F$ is $(-1-C,1+B,B-A)$
notice that incenter $I$ is $(1,1,1)$ and circumcentre $O$ is $(A,B,C)$ then line $OI$ is $(C-B,A-C,B-A)$ the rest part is to calculate the Det which is easy only takes 5minutes
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
navi_09220114
487 posts
#16 • 4 Y
Y by k12byda5h, jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
It is well known (and proveable using cross ratio) that $A_0D$ passes through the A-excenter, call it $I_a$. Now we want to prove $DI_a, EI_b, F_c$ concur at $OI$, where $I_a, I_b, I_c$ are the excenters. But just note that $I_bI_c\parallel EF$ and similarly to other two sides, so $\triangle I_aI_bI_c$ and $\triangle DEF$ are homothetic. So the three lines concur at the center of homothety, say $P$. $P$ also lie on the line through circumcenter of the two triangles, which is line $IX_{40}$, which coincide with $OI$, because $O$ is midpoint of $IX_{40}$. So $P, O, I$ colinear and we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Delray
348 posts
#18 • 3 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
Midpoints are nasty to work with, so we delete them from the problem by instead considering the lines $AI_A$, $BI_B$, and $CI_C$, as the midpoint of the altitude from A, D and $I_A$ are collinear. Observing that the sides of $\triangle{DEF}$ are parallel to those of $\triangle{I_AI_BI_C}$, we see that there is a homothety mapping to $I_A$ to $D$, and so on for the other two vertices. This already implies that $A_0D$, $B_0E$ and $C_0F$ are concurrent. Let this point of concurrency be $T$.

Denote the circumcenters of $\triangle{DEF}$ and $\triangle{I_AI_BI_C}$ as $I$ and $O_{I}$ respectively. Let the incenter of $\triangle{I_AI_BI_C}$, which is also the circumcenter of$\triangle{ABC}$, be $O$. $O_I$, otherwise known as the Bevan Point of $\triangle{ABC}$, is on line connecting containing the incenter and circumcenter of $\triangle{ABC}$, implying that $O_{I}$, $O$ and $I$ are collinear. Our homothety however, maps the circumcenter of $\triangle{I_AI_BI_C}$ to the circumcenter of $\triangle{DEF}$, implying that $T$, $O_I$, and $I$ are collinear. It follows that $T$, $I$ and $O$ are
collinear, implying that $IO$ also passes through $T$ as desired. $\square$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Delray, Apr 20, 2017, 3:31 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
trumpeter
3332 posts
#19 • 3 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
Let $I_A$ be the $A$-excenter, $I_B$ be the $B$-excenter, and $I_C$ be the $C$-excenter of $\triangle{ABC}$. Let $\omega$ be the incircle of $\triangle{ABC}$, $\Gamma$ be the circumcircle of $\triangle{ABC}$, and $\Omega$ be the circumcircle of $\triangle{I_AI_BI_C}$ (centered at $P$). Let $Q$ be the exsimilicenter of $\Gamma$ and $\Omega$. Note that $Q$ lies on $OP$.

If $M_A$ is the midpoint of arc $BC$ of $\Gamma$ which does not contain $A$, then the incenter-excenter lemma gives that $M_A$ is the midpoint of $II_A$. Similar statements hold for $B$ and $C$, so $\Gamma$ maps to $\Omega$ under a homothety centered at $I$ with ratio $2$. In particular $P$ lies on $OI$, so $Q$ lies on $OI$. Furthermore, the tangent to $\Omega$ at $I_A$ is parallel to the tangent to $\Gamma$ at $M_A$, which is parallel to $BC$.

Now, let $A_1$ be the foot of $A$ onto $BC$, $D_1$ be the tangency point of the $A$-excircle of $\triangle{ABC}$ onto $BC$, and $D_2$ be the antipode of $D_1$ with respect to the $A$-excircle of $\triangle{ABC}$. Then the homothety centered at $A$ sending $\omega$ to the $A$-excircle of $\triangle{ABC}$ sends $D$ to $D_2$, so $A$, $D$ and $D_2$ are collinear. Now, consider the spiral similarity sending $AA_1$ to $D_2D_1$. Because $D\in AD_2$ and $D\in A_1D_1$, $D$ is the center of this. But this maps $A_0$ to $I_A$, so $A_0$, $D$, and $I_A$ are collinear. Thus, we can instead consider $DI_A$.

Now, I claim that $Q$ lies on $DI_A$. Consider the homothety centered at $P$ sending $\omega$ to $\Omega$. It sends $D$ to $I_A$ because these are the ``bottom-most'' points (their tangents are parallel to $BC$). Thus, $Q$ lies on $DI_A$.

But then by symmetry, $Q$ lies on $EI_B$ and $FI_C$ also, so $A_0D$, $B_0E$, $C_0F$ concur at $Q$ on $OI$.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Luis González, Apr 21, 2019, 3:25 AM
Reason: Unhiding solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Kagebaka
3001 posts
#20 • 8 Y
Y by SD2014, AlastorMoody, lilavati_2005, Limerent, jhu08, Hermione.Potter, Adventure10, Mango247
I didn't see this solution while skimming so here's a cevian nest solution:

Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
khanhnx
1619 posts
#21 • 2 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10
Here is my solution for this problem
Solution
Let $X$, $Y$, $Z$ be second intersections of $DA_0$, $EB_0$, $FC_0$ with $(I)$; $D'$ is reflection of $D$ through $I$; $S$ $\equiv$ $AD$ $\cap$ $(I)$ $(S \not \equiv D)$
Since: $D(DSD'X) = D(AHD'A_0) = - 1$ then: $DXSD'$ is harmonic quadrilateral
But: $DFD'E$ is harmonic quadrilateral so: $EF$, $XD'$, $BC$ and tangent at $S$ of $(I)$ concurrent
Hence: $X(BCDD') = - 1$ or $XD$ is bisector of $\angle{BXC}$
Then: $(BCX)$ tangents $(I)$ at $X$
Similarly: $(CAY)$ tangents $(I)$ at $Y$, $(ABZ)$ tangents $(I)$ at $Z$
Let $A_1$, $A'$ be midpoint of $\stackrel\frown{BC}$ which not containing $A$ of $(O)$, midpoint of $\stackrel\frown{BC}$ which not containing $X$ of $(BCX)$; similarly, we have: $B_1$, $B'$, $C_1$, $C'$
We have: $IA'^2 - IC'^2 = \overline{A'D} . \overline{A'X} - \overline{C'F} . \overline{C'Z} = BA'^2 - BC'^2$
Then: $C'A'$ $\perp$ $IB$
But: $C_1A_1$ $\perp$ $IB$ so: $C_1A_1$ $\parallel$ $C'A'$
Similarly: $B_1C_1$ $\parallel$ $B'C'$, $A_1B_1$ $\parallel$ $A'B'$
Hence: $O$ is circumcenter of $\triangle A'B'C'$
Let $J$ be external homothetic center of $(I)$ and $(A'B'C')$ then: $J$; $D$; $A'$ are collinear
But: $D$, $X$, $A'$ are collinear so: $D$, $J$, $X$, $A'$ are collinear or $D$, $J$, $X$ are collinear
Similarly: $E$, $J$, $Y$ are are collinear; $F$, $J$, $Z$ are collinear
Hence: $DX$, $EY$, $FZ$ concurrent at a point $J$ lies on $IO$ or $DA_0$, $EB_0$, $FC_0$ concurrent at a point $J$ lies on $IO$
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AlastorMoody
2125 posts
#22 • 3 Y
Y by jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
Lemma #2, Result #3, Result #4 (here)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
a1267ab
223 posts
#23 • 5 Y
Y by Kagebaka, AlastorMoody, jhu08, Adventure10, Mango247
Anyone want to try this generalization?

Let $ABC$ be a triangle with circumcenter $O$. Let $D, E, F$ be the feet of the altitudes from $A, B, C$ respectively. Denote by $A_{0}$, $B_{0}$, $C_{0}$ the midpoints of $AD, BE, CF$. Let $P$ be a point on the Darboux cubic of $ABC$, and $X, Y, Z$ be the feet from $P$ to $BC, CA, AB$. Prove that $A_0X, B_0Y, C_0Z, OP$ concur.

($P$ being on the Darboux cubic just means that $AX, BY, CZ$ concur.)
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by a1267ab, Jul 27, 2019, 3:46 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Dr_Vex
562 posts
#24 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
See that ${ A_{0} –D –I _ {A}}$
We know that isotomic conjugate of Gergonne point is Nagel point, Due to which$ \Delta ABC$ forms a cevian nest WRT its excentral triangle.
$ I_{A}D,I_{B}E, I_{C}F$ concur
Now homothety centred at $X$ taking
$\Delta DEF \leftrightarrow \Delta I_{A} I_B I {C}$
finishes the question $\blacksquare $
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
srijonrick
168 posts
#25 • 5 Y
Y by amar_04, Aritra12, abhradeep12, jhu08, kamatadu
orl wrote:
Given a triangle $ABC$. Let $O$ be the circumcenter of this triangle $ABC$. Let $H$, $K$, $L$ be the feet of the altitudes of triangle $ABC$ from the vertices $A$, $B$, $C$, respectively. Denote by $A_{0}$, $B_{0}$, $C_{0}$ the midpoints of these altitudes $AH$, $BK$, $CL$, respectively. The incircle of triangle $ABC$ has center $I$ and touches the sides $BC$, $CA$, $AB$ at the points $D$, $E$, $F$, respectively. Prove that the four lines $A_{0}D$, $B_{0}E$, $C_{0}F$ and $OI$ are concurrent. (When the point $O$ concides with $I$, we consider the line $OI$ as an arbitrary line passing through $O$.)

To prove that the four lines $A_{0}D$, $B_{0}E$, $C_{0}F$ and $OI$ are concurrent. First we will prove that the lines $A_{0}D$, $B_{0}E$, $C_{0}F$ are concurrent.

Recall that by Midpoint of Altitudes Lemma, the set of points $\{A_0, D, I_A \}$, $\{B_0, E, I_B \}$ and $\{C_0, F, I_C \}$ are collinear $-(\bigstar)$. Hence it suffices to show that the lines $\overline{I_AD}, \overline{I_BE}$ and $\overline{I_CF}$ are concurrent. Note that in $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$, the lines $AI_A, BI_B$ and $CI_C$ are concurrent at $I$ since the points $\{A, I, I_A \}$, $\{B, I, I_B \}$ and $\{C, I, I_C \}$ are collinear (by Fact5). Next note that the lines $AD, BE$ and $CF$ are concurrent at the "Gergonne Point". So, by the Cevian Nest (Theorem) we have the lines $\overline{I_AD}, \overline{I_BE}$ and $\overline{I_CF}$ concurrent, at some point. Let us denote that concurrency point by $X$.

So, $(X=\overline{I_AD} \cap \overline{I_BE} \cap \overline{I_CF})$. Next we will prove that the line $OI$ passes through $X$ as well.

Next recall that by Duality of Orthocenters and Excenters Lemma, $\triangle ABC$ is the orthic triangle of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ and $I$ is the orthcenter of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$. Also from $(\bigstar)$ we can conclude that there exists a homothety $\psi$ that maps $\triangle DEF$ to $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$. And hence the point $I$, which is the circumcenter of $\triangle DEF$ gets mapped to the circumcenter of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ (let us denote it by $O'$), and hence $X, I, O'$ are collinear $ - (\star)$. Next note that in $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$, the points: $I$ (the orthocenter), $O'$ (the circumcenter) and the Nine-Point center must be collinear, as all of these lie on the Euler Line $ - (\star\star)$. Hence from $(\star)$ and $(\star\star)$ we can conclude that $X, I, O'$ and the Nine-Point center of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ are collinear. $-(\bigstar\bigstar)$

Now, note that in $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$, $AI_A, BI_B$ and $CI_C$ are the altitudes, that is $A, B$ and $C$ are the feet of the altitudes, and the circumcircle of $\triangle ABC$ passes through these $3$ points only, hence $\odot(ABC)$ is the Nine-Point Circle of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ and thus the center of $\odot(ABC)$, $O$ is the Nine-Point center of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$. Hence from $(\bigstar\bigstar)$ we can say that $X, I, O'$ and $O$ are collinear, and thus $OI$ passes through $X$ as well. $\quad \blacksquare$
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Afo
1002 posts
#27 • 2 Y
Y by jhu08, Mango247
The proof that $A_0D,B_0E,C_0F$ are concurrent is identical to the solutions above (That is, there is a homethethy between $DEF$ and $I_AI_BI_C$). Now, we "include" proving $OI$. Let $P$ be the circumcircle of $I_AI_BI_C$. It's enough to show that $I,O,P$ are collinear. Note that $I$, $O$, $P$, is the orthocenter, nine-point center, and circumcenter respectively so they lie on the Euler's line of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$.
[asy]
import graph; size(31.668149578472285cm); real lsf=0.5; pen dps=linewidth(0.7)+fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); pen ds=black; real xmin=-3.4012066955558575,xmax=28.266942882916428,ymin=-7.3203210542584065,ymax=14.233001568944603; 
pen xdxdff=rgb(0.49019607843137253,0.49019607843137253,1.), qqccqq=rgb(0.,0.8,0.), ffttcc=rgb(1.,0.2,0.8), ffqqtt=rgb(1.,0.,0.2); 
pair A=(9.011309345848499,7.215059903683832), B=(7.060803027120685,-0.9462221037893297), C=(14.294050373775246,-1.2914678077732946), I=(9.97820131745357,1.2452595365401127), O=(10.848355810206165,2.462293101426641), F=(7.713890745265604,1.7864186429857236), D=(9.867207656966674,-1.0801728862885847), I_A=(11.232649004007717,-6.499969895476381), I_B=(20.375805631921757,9.05569770470921), I_C=(1.8067677366971093,6.0481844618646425), P=(11.71851037050289,3.6793262492811234); 
draw(A--B,linewidth(2.)); draw(B--C,linewidth(2.)); draw(C--A,linewidth(2.)); draw(circle((10.848355810206167,2.4622931014266416),5.095442276078402),linewidth(2.)+xdxdff); draw(circle(I,2.3280797979904406),linewidth(2.)+qqccqq); draw(D--(11.955936837608213,2.4734768455411915),linewidth(2.)); draw((11.955936837608213,2.4734768455411915)--F,linewidth(2.)); draw(F--D,linewidth(2.)); draw((xmin,1.3986407873809124*xmin-12.710659810748405)--(xmax,1.3986407873809124*xmax-12.710659810748405),linewidth(2.)+linetype("4 4")+ffttcc); draw(circle(P,10.190884714789368),linewidth(2.)+ffqqtt); draw(I_C--I_B,linewidth(2.)); draw(I_B--I_A,linewidth(2.)); draw(I_A--I_C,linewidth(2.)); 
dot(A,ds); label("$A$",(9.11120887133264,7.464808717394179),NE*lsf); dot(B,ds); label("$B$",(6.488846327373972,-1.2763997624679915),NE*lsf); dot(C,ds); label("$C$",(14.630657654331356,-1.3762992879521305),NE*lsf); dot(I,linewidth(4.pt)+ds); label("$I$",(10.085229244803001,1.445862306974799),NE*lsf); dot(O,linewidth(4.pt)+ds); label("$O$",(10.5847268722237,2.6696314941555026),NE*lsf); dot((11.955936837608213,2.4734768455411915),linewidth(4.pt)+ds); label("$E$",(12.05824487311476,2.6696314941555026),NE*lsf); dot(F,linewidth(4.pt)+ds); label("$F$",(7.23809276850502,1.420887425603764),NE*lsf); dot(D,linewidth(4.pt)+ds); label("$D$",(9.885430193834722,-1.5760983389204086),NE*lsf); dot(I_A,linewidth(4.pt)+ds); label("$I_A$",(11.45884772020992,-6.9456978336928845),NE*lsf); dot(I_B,linewidth(4.pt)+ds); label("$I_B$",(20.474779895153528,9.263000176108683),NE*lsf); dot(I_C,linewidth(4.pt)+ds); label("$I_C$",(1.3440207649407778,6.191089767471405),NE*lsf); dot(P,linewidth(4.pt)+ds); label("$P$",(11.583722127065096,3.9183755627072414),NE*lsf); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); [/asy]
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Afo, Aug 21, 2020, 5:51 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
meql
20 posts
#28 • 4 Y
Y by amar_04, a1267ab, jhu08, Mango247
a1267ab wrote:
Anyone want to try this generalization?

Let $ABC$ be a triangle with circumcenter $O$. Let $D, E, F$ be the feet of the altitudes from $A, B, C$ respectively. Denote by $A_{0}$, $B_{0}$, $C_{0}$ the midpoints of $AD, BE, CF$. Let $P$ be a point on the Darboux cubic of $ABC$, and $X, Y, Z$ be the feet from $P$ to $BC, CA, AB$. Prove that $A_0X, B_0Y, C_0Z, OP$ concur.

($P$ being on the Darboux cubic just means that $AX, BY, CZ$ concur.)

Let $P'$ be the reflection of $P$ over $O$.

Claim: There exist points $A',B',C'$ on $PX,PY,PZ$ such that $A\in B'C', B\in C'A'$, and $C\in A'B'$.

Proof: Let $A'B'C'$ be the antipedal triangle of $P'$. Since $P$ and $P'$ are reflections over $O$, $P$ is the isogonal conjugate of $P'$ with respect to $A'B'C'$. Thus, $A'P\perp BC$, so $A'$ lies on $PX$. Similarly, $B',C'$ lie on $PY,PZ$ respectively. $\square$

By cevian nest, $AA',BB',CC'$ concur at some point $Q$. Projecting $(AD;A_0P_{\infty})$ through $X$ onto $AA'$, we see that $Q$ lies on $A_0X$. Similarly, $Q$ lies on $B_0Y$ and $C_0Z$. But by Sondat's theorem, $P, Q$, and $P'$ are collinear, so $Q$ lies on $OP$. Thus, $A_0Z, B_0Y, C_0Z, OP$ concur ar $Q$. $\square$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by meql, Aug 21, 2020, 11:11 PM
Reason: added space for readability
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ike.chen
1162 posts
#30 • 2 Y
Y by Siddharth03, jhu08
Let $I_a$, $I_b$, $I_c$ be the $A$-excenter, $B$-excenter, and $C$-excenter of $ABC$ respectively, and define $O_1$ as the circumcenter of $I_aI_bI_c$. In addition, we label the feet of the altitudes from $A, B, C$ as $X, Y, Z$ respectively. The Midpoint of Altitudes Lemma implies $I_a \in A_0D$, $I_b \in B_0E$, and $I_c \in C_0F$.

Claim: $DEF$ and $I_aI_bI_c$ are homothetic.

Proof. Properties of internal and external bisectors yield $CI \perp \overline{I_aCI_b}$. Now, since $CD = CE$ and $\angle ECI = \angle ICD$, we can conclude $IC \perp DE$, so $\overline{I_aCI_b} \parallel DE$. Analogous processes give $I_bI_c \parallel EF$ and $I_cI_a \parallel FD$, as required. $\square$

Thus, $\overline{A_0DI_a}$, $\overline{B_0EI_b}$, and $\overline{C_0FI_c}$ concur at a homothetic center of $DEF$ and $I_aI_bI_c$, which we denote with $J$.

Claim: $OI$ is the Euler Line of $I_aI_bI_c$.

Proof. It's well-known that $ABC$ is the orthic triangle of $I_aI_bI_c$. Hence, $I$ is the orthocenter of $I_aI_bI_c$.

Now, we also know $(ABC)$ is the Nine-Point Circle of $I_aI_bI_c$, so $O$ is the Nine-Point Center of $I_aI_bI_c$. The desired result follows readily. $\square$

Hence, we have $O_1 \in OI$.

Claim: $J \in IO_1$.

Proof. Because $I$ is the circumcenter of $DEF$ and $O_1$ is the circumcenter of $I_aI_bI_c$, we know $IO_1$ passes through any of the homothetic centers between the two triangles. $\square$

Now, we can conclude $J \in \overline{OIO_1}$, which finishes. $\blacksquare$


An Alternate Start: You can also use the Cevian Nest Lemma on $I_aI_bI_c$ and $ABC$ to show that $I_aD, I_bE, I_cF$ concur. In fact, this was how I initially proved the concurrency.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by ike.chen, Aug 25, 2022, 5:21 AM
Reason: Overhaul and Reflection
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
srisainandan6
2811 posts
#31 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
Denote $I_A,I_B,I_C$ as the excenters of $A,B,C$ respectively.

By Lemma 4.14 (EGMO), we have that $A_0,B_0,C_0$ lie on $I_AD,I_BE,I_CF$ respectively. Hence if suffices to show that $I_AD,I_BE,I_CF$$,$$OI$ are concurrent.

Claim: There exists a homotethy sending $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ to $\triangle DEF$.

Proof: It suffices to show $I_AI_B \parallel DE$, and the rest of the corresponding sides follow with the same logic. We will show $\angle I_BCB = \angle EDB$. Since $CD=CE$, we have $\angle EDC = 90 - \frac{\angle C}{2}$, so $\angle EDB = 90 + \frac{\angle C}{2}$. It is easy to see that $\angle I_BCB = 90 + \frac{\angle C}{2}$, so we are done.

All is left now is to show that $OI$ passes through $X$. Observe that $I$ is the circumcenter of $\triangle DEF$. Label $O'$ as the circumcenter of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$. If the center of homotethy is $X$, then $O'I$ passes through $X$.

It is well known that $O'$ lies on $OI$, the Euler line, so $OI$ also passes through $X$.$\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
hakN
429 posts
#32 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
Let $I_A , I_B , I_C$ be the excenters corresponding to vertices $A,B,C$ respectively.
It is well known that $A_0 , D , I_A$ , $B_0 , E , I_B$ , $C_0 , F , I_C$ are collinear.
Also note that $\triangle DEF$ and $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ are homothetic, thus $DI_A , EI_B , FI_C$ are concurrent at the homothety center say $P$.
Let $K$ be the center of $(I_AI_BI_C)$. Since $O$ is the 9-point center of $(I_AI_BI_C)$ and $I$ is the orthocenter of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$, we have $I,O,K$ are collinear. But, since $P$ is the center of homothety, we know $P,I,K$ are collinear. Thus, $P$ lies on $OI$, as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
IAmTheHazard
5005 posts
#33 • 1 Y
Y by jhu08
Let $I_A,I_B,I_C$ denote the $A,B,C$-excenters respectively, and rename $H,K,L$ as $X,Y,Z$ respectively.. It is well-known that
  • $A_0,D,I_A$ collinear,
  • $B_0,E,I_B$ collinear,
  • $C_0,F,I_C$ collinear,
so it suffices to show that $\overline{I_AD},\overline{I_BE},\overline{I_CF},\overline{OI}$ concur.
Since $\overline{AI_A},\overline{BI_B},\overline{CI_C}$ are concurrent at the orthocenter of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ and $\overline{AD},\overline{BE},\overline{CF}$ are concurrent at the Gergonne point of $\triangle ABC$, by Cevian nest $\overline{I_AD},\overline{I_BE},\overline{I_CF}$ concur, say at point $P$.
I now claim that $\overline{I_BI_C}$ and $\overline{EF}$ are parallel. It is well-known that $\overline{AI_A} \perp \overline{I_BI_C}$ and $A,I_A,I$ are collinear, so it suffices to show that $\overline{AI} \perp \overline{EF}$. But this follows as $IE=IF$ and $AE=AF$, so $AEIF$ is a kite.
Since $\overline{I_CI_A} \parallel \overline{FD}$ and $\overline{I_AI_B} \parallel \overline{DE}$ similarly, with the previous concurrency we find that $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ and $\triangle DEF$ are homothetic. Now consider the homothety sending $\triangle DEF$ to $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$. This sends the circumcenter of $\triangle DEF$ (which is $I$) to the circumcenter of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$. Since $\triangle ABC$ is the orthic triangle of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$, we find that $I$ (the orthocenter of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$) is collinear with the circumcenter of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ and the circumcenter $O$ of $\triangle DEF$, which is the 9-point center of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$, hence $P,O,I$ are collinear as desired. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mogmog8
1080 posts
#34 • 2 Y
Y by centslordm, jhu08
Solution
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by Mogmog8, Sep 14, 2021, 3:59 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
AwesomeYRY
579 posts
#35
Y by
Claim: $\triangle I_A I_BI_C\sim \triangle DEF$.
Proof: Note that the sides are parallel, for example $EF\parallel I_BI_C$ since both are perpendicular to $AI$. Additionally,
\[\angle EDF = 180 - \angle FDB - \angle EDC = 180 - (90 - \frac12 B) - (90-\frac12 C) = 180 - (90 + \frac12 A) = 180-\angle BIC = \angle BI_A C\]$\square$.

Now, consider the homothety centered at $X$ that sends $\triangle DEF$ to $\triangle I_A I_B I_C$. It clearly sends $D\to I_A, E\to I_B, F\to I_C$, and $I$ goes to $O'$, the circumcenter of $\triangle A'B'C'$. Note that $I, O$ are the orthocenter and nine point center of $\triangle I_A I_B I_C$. Thus, the circumcenter of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ lies on $IO$, so $X,I,O_{(ABC)}$ are also collinear and we're done. $\blacksquare$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pinkpig
3766 posts
#36 • 1 Y
Y by hungrypig
Partial Solution

Can I have a hint on how to prove that the point of concurrency lies on $OI?$ Thanks in advance!
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
franzliszt
23531 posts
#37 • 1 Y
Y by Mango247
The results of this entire problem are quite well-known nowadays. Let $\triangle I_aI_bI_c$ be the excentral triangle of $\triangle ABC$. Note that $A_0,D,I_a$ (and $B_0,E,I_b$ and $C_0,F,I_c$) are colinear by the well-known Midpoints of Altitudes Lemma (Lemma 4.14 in EGMO). Hence, it suffices to show that $DI_a,EI_b,FI_c$ concur on $\overline{OI}$. However, these three lines meet at $X_{57}$, the Isogonal Mittenpunkt point, which is known to lie on $\overline{OI}$. Done. $\blacksquare$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
franzliszt
23531 posts
#38
Y by
But suppose that we didn't know what the Isogonal Mittenpunkt point was...

Set $\triangle ABC$ as the reference triangle with $A=(1,0,0),B=(0,1,0),C=(0,0,1)$. We also have $D=(0:s-c:s-b)$ and $I_a=(-a:b:c)$. Foot of $A$-altitude has coordinates $H=\left(0:a^2+b^2-c^2:a^2-b^2+c^2\right)$. We can normalize by multiplying each component by $\frac{1}{2a^2}$. Applying the midpoint formula on $\overline{AH}$ gives $A_0=\left(2a^2:a^2+b^2-c^2:a^2-b^2+c^2\right)$.

We claim that $A_0,D,I_a$ are colinear. To prove this, we just need to verify $$\begin{vmatrix}-a&b&c\\ 0&s-c&s-b\\ 2a^2&a^2+b^2-c^2&a^2-b^2+c^2\end{vmatrix}=0$$which is true upon expansion.

We can do similar things to show that $B_0,E,I_b$ and $C_0,F,I_c$ are colinear (just permute variables). Thus, it suffices to show that $DI_a,EI_b,FI_c$ concur on the line $OI$.

The equation of line $DI_a$ is given by $$\begin{vmatrix}x&y&z\\ 0&s-c&s-b\\ -a&b&c\end{vmatrix}=0 \iff (c-b)(-a+b+c)x+a(a-b+c)y-a(a+b-c)z=0. $$We can find the equtaions of lines $EI_b,FI_c$ by permuting variables.

To see that $DI_a,EI_b,FI_c$ concur, we need to check that $$\begin{vmatrix}(c-b)(-a+b+c)&a(a-b+c)&-a(a+b-c)\\ -b(-a+b+c)&(a-c)(a-b+c)&b(a+b-c)\\ c(-a+b+c)&-c(a-b+c)&(b-a)(a+b-c)\end{vmatrix}=0$$however this is quite clear since $$\begin{vmatrix}(c-b)(-a+b+c)&a(a-b+c)&-a(a+b-c)\\ -b(-a+b+c)&(a-c)(a-b+c)&b(a+b-c)\\ c(-a+b+c)&-c(a-b+c)&(b-a)(a+b-c)\end{vmatrix}=(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c)\begin{vmatrix}(c-b)&a&-a\\ -b&(a-c)&b\\ c&-c&(b-a)\end{vmatrix}=0.$$
So the lines concur. Their concurrency point is the non-trivial solution to $$\begin{bmatrix}(c-b)(-a+b+c)&a(a-b+c)&-a(a+b-c)\\ -b(-a+b+c)&(a-c)(a-b+c)&b(a+b-c)\\ c(-a+b+c)&-c(a-b+c)&(b-a)(a+b-c)\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x\\y\\z\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}0\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}$$which we can solve with Cramer's Rule to be $$\left(\frac{a}{-a+b+c} ,\frac{b}{a-b+c},\frac{c}{a+b-c}\right).$$
Finally, it suffices to check that this point lies on $OI$. Since $I=(a:b:c)$ and $O=(a^2(b^2+c^2-a^2):b^2(c^2+a^2-b^2):c^2(a^2+b^2-c^2))$, we just need to verify that $$\begin{vmatrix}a&b&c\\ a^2(b^2+c^2-a^2)&b^2(c^2+a^2-b^2)&c^2(a^2+b^2-c^2)\\ \frac{a}{-a+b+c}&\frac{b}{a-b+c}&\frac{c}{a+b-c}\end{vmatrix}=0 $$which (after factoring out $abc$) is true upon expansion.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
th1nq3r
146 posts
#39
Y by
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
YaoAOPS
1551 posts
#40
Y by
Note that $A_0$, $D$, $I_A$ are collinear and so on. As such, it remains to show that the lines $I_AD$, $I_BE$, $I_CF$ are collinear. Since $\triangle I_AI_BI_C \sim \triangle DEF$, that follows and the lines intersect at the homothety center.
Then, $I$ and $O$ are the orthocenter and nine-point center of $I_AI_BI_C$ respectively. As such, the circumcenter of $I_AI_BI_C$ lies on $IO$. Since $I$ is the circumcenter of $DEF$, it follows that $IO$ also is concurrent.
Attachments:
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
eibc
600 posts
#41
Y by
Let $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ be the excentral triangle. By the midpoints of altitudes lemma, we have $A_0, D$, and $I_A$ collinear, and analogous results for the others. Therefore it now suffices to show that $DI_A, EI_B, FI_C, OI$ are collinear. But $\overline{DE} \parallel \overline{I_AI_B}$ as they're both perpendicular to $\overline{IC}$, and similar for the other sides, so $DI_A, EI_B$, and $FI_C$ concur at the center of homothety taking $\triangle DEF$ to $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$. But it's well-known that the Euler line of both triangles is $OI$, and as such the result follows.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
cursed_tangent1434
662 posts
#42
Y by
Solved with kingu. Very fun problem.

It is well known (Midpoint of the Altitudes) that $A_0D$ passes through $I_A$ and similarly for the other sides. Then, we can eliminate the points $A_0$ , $B_0$ and $C_0$ from the picture. It remains to show that $I_AD$ , $I_BE$ and $I_CF$ are concurrent on $IO$. For this, note that since $\triangle DEF$ and $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ are homothetic, it follows that $I_AD$ , $I_BE$ and $I_CF$ are concurrent, say at point $R$. Then, note that since $\triangle M_AM_BM_C \sim \triangle DEF$ are homothetic, and the circumcenters of these two triangles are $O$ and $I$ respectively, their orthocenters must also be concurrent at this concurrency point. Clearly, $I$ is the orthocenter of $\triangle M_AM_BM_C$ ($AI \perp M_BM_C$ etc. as mentioned before) and thus, the orthocenter of $\triangle DEF$ must also lie on $IO$. Then, since $\triangle DEF$ and $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ are homothetic, the line joining their orthocenters must be concurrent at $X$ as well. It is well known that the orthocenter of $\triangle I_AI_BI_C$ is $I$. We previously showed that the orthocenter of $\triangle DEF$ lies on $IO$ from which it follows that $IO$ passes through $X$, as the problem requires.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
blueberryfaygo_55
340 posts
#43 • 1 Y
Y by megarnie
Lemma. In $\Delta ABC$, let $D$ be the contact point of incircle $(I)$ with $BC$, $I_a$ be the $A$-excenter, and $M$ be the midpoint of altitude $AH$ $(H \in BC)$. Then, $M, D, I_a$ are collinear.

Proof. Let $E$ be the point diametrically across $D$ in $(I)$, $Y$ be the point diametrically across $X$ in $(I_a)$, and $B', C'$ be the intersection of the line parallel to $BC$ through $E$ with $AB, AC$, respectively. Then, $AB'C'$ and $ABC$ are homothetic triangles, and the homothety centered at $A$ that sends $\Delta AB'C'$ to $\Delta ABC$ sends $(I)$, the $A$-excircle of $AB'C'$, to $I_a$. This homothety thus sends $E$ to $X$ and $D$ to $Y$, so $A,D,Y$ are collinear. Now, consider the homothety centered at $D$ that sends $H$ (the foot of the altitude from $A$ to $BC$) to $X$; since $AH \parallel XY$, this homothety sends $A$ to $Y$, which implies that the homothety sends $AH$ to $XY$ and the midpoint $M$ of $AH$ to the midpoint $I_a$ of $XY$. Therefore, $M, D, I_a$ are collinear. $\blacksquare$

Letting $I_a, I_b, I_c$ be the $A$-excenter, $B$-excenter, and $C$-excenter in $\Delta ABC$ and applying the lemma, $A_{0}D$, $B_{0}E$, and $C_{0}F$ are equivalent to $I_aD$, $I_bE$, and $I_cF$, respectively. By the Duality of Orthocenters and Excenters, we now introduce a new, but equivalent configuration where $\Delta I_aI_bI_c$ becomes the reference triangle $\Delta ABC$:

In triangle $ABC$, let $AD, BE, CF$ be altitudes from $A,B,C$ to their opposite sides, respectively. Let $H$ be the orthocenter of $\Delta ABC$ and $X,Y,Z$ be the feet of altitudes from $H$ to $EF, DF, DE$, respectively. In this new configuration, $I_aI_bI_c$ becomes $ABC$, the original $ABC$ becomes $DEF$, and $I$, which was previously the incenter of $ABC$, becomes $H$, the center of $DEF$. $D,E,F$, which were originally the touchpoints of the incenter of $ABC$, becomes $X,Y,Z$. We first show that $AX, BY, CZ$ concur.

In $\Delta DEF$, $H$ is the incenter, so $HF \perp XY$. However, $HF \perp AB$, so $XY \parallel AB$. Similarly, $XZ \parallel AC$ and $YZ \parallel BC$. Thus, $\Delta XYZ$ and $\Delta ABC$ are homothetic triangles, and $AX, BY, CZ$ concur at their homothetic center.

We now note that $O$ in our original configuration becomes the the circumcenter of $\Delta DEF$, so $O$ must be $N_9$, the center of the $9$-point circle of $\Delta ABC$. Therefore, $OI$ in our original configuration becomes $N_9H$, the Euler line of $\Delta ABC$. We need to show that $N_9H$ passes through the homothetic center of $\Delta XYZ$ and $\Delta ABC$. However, this is clear because the same homothety that sends $\Delta XYZ$ to $\Delta ABC$ will send $H$, the circumcenter of $\Delta XYZ$ to the circumcenter of $\Delta ABC$, and we know that the circumcenter of $ABC$ is on the Euler line, so we are done. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Eka01
204 posts
#44
Y by
Note by midpoints of altitudes lemma, the midpoint of the $A$ altitude, $D$ and the $A$ excenter $I_a$ are collinear and analogous results for other vertices. Since the excentral triangle and the intouch triangle are homothetic, the lines joining corresponding vertices concur at the exsimilicenter. Note that $I$ is the orthocenter of the excentral triangle and $O$ is its nine point center. Since $I$ is mapped to the bevan point of $\Delta ABC$ which is well known to $OI$, we are done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ilikeminecraft
685 posts
#45
Y by
We begin by (re)naming a bunch of points
Let $A_0B_0C_0$ be the orthic triangle.
Let $M_A $ be the midpoint of $A_0, A.$ Define $M_B, M_C$ similarly.
Let $A_1B_1C_1$ be the intouch triangle.
Let $A_2$ denote the second intersection of $A_1, M_A$ with the incircle. 2002 ISLG 7 implies $A_2$ is the tangency of $\omega_a$ with the incircle.
Define $B_2, C_2$ similarly.
Let $A_3$ be the second intersection of $A_2A_1$ with $\omega_a.$ By curvilinear properties, $A_3$ is the midpoint of arc $BC.$ Define $B_3, C_3$ similarly.
Let $S_A$ denote the midpoint of arc $BC$ in $(ABC).$ Let $I_A$ denote the $A$-excenter. By 2002 ISLG 7, it follows $M_A, A_1, A_3, I_A$ are collinear.
Claim: $A_3, B_3, C_3$ have circumcenter $O$
Proof: Take a half homothety centered at $I_A.$ This moves $I\to S_A, A_1\to A_3.$ Thus, $S_AA_3 = \frac r2,$ which is fixed. Thus, $OA_3 = OB_3 = OC_3 = R + \frac r2.$

Finally, note that $DEF$ and $I_AI_BI_C$ are homothetic due to obvious reasons. Thus, the triangle formed by the respective midpoints are also homothetic, which is $A_3B_3C_3.$ Thus, $A_3A_1, B_3B_1, C_3C_1$ are concurrent, and also the line connecting the circumcenters, which is $O, I.$
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a