ka May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.
Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.
Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!
Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.
Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)
Intermediate: Grades 8-12
Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:
To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.
More specifically:
For new threads:
a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.
Examples: Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿) Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"
b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.
Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".
c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote][/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.
For answers to already existing threads:
d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve , do not answer with " is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like " is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.
e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.
To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).
The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
Master Alchemist Aurelius is renowned for his mastery of elemental fusion. He works with seven fundamental, yet mysterious, elements: Ignis (Fire), Aqua (Water), Terra (Earth), Aer (Air), Lux (Light), Umbra (Shadow), and Aether (Spirit). Each element possesses a unique 'potency' value, a positive integer crucial for his most complex fusions
Aurelius has lost his master log of these potencies. All he has left are seven cryptic scrolls, each containing a precise relationship between the potencies of various elements. He needs these values to complete his Grand Device. Can you help him deduce the exact potency of each element?
The Elements and Their Potencies:
Let I represent the potency of Ignis (Fire).
Let A represent the potency of Aqua (Water).
Let T represent the potency of Terra (Earth).
Let R represent the potency of Aer (Air).
Let L represent the potency of Lux (Light).
Let U represent the potency of Umbra (Shadow).
Let E represent the potency of Aether (Spirit).
The Cryptic Scrolls (System of Equations):
Aurelius's scrolls reveal the following relationships:
The combined potency of Ignis, Aqua, and Terra is equal to the potency of Aer plus Lux, plus a constant of two.
If you sum the potencies of Aqua and Umbra, it precisely equals the sum of Lux and Aether, minus one.
The sum of Terra and Aer potencies is the same as the sum of Ignis, Aqua, and Aether potencies, minus one.
Three times the potency of Ignis, plus the potency of Aer, is equal to the sum of Aqua, Terra, and Aether potencies, plus five.
The difference between Lux and Ignis potencies is identical to the difference between Umbra and Aqua potencies.
The sum of Umbra and Aether potencies, when decreased by the potency of Terra, results in twice the potency of Aqua.
The potency of Ignis added to Lux, minus the potency of Aer, is equivalent to the potency of Aether minus Umbra, plus one.
The Grand Challenge:
Using only the information from the cryptic scrolls, set up and solve the system of seven linear equations to determine the unique positive integer potency value for each of the seven elements: I,A,T,R,L,U,E.
good luck, and whoever finds the potencies first, gets a title of The SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS MASTER
p.s. Yes, I did just come up with a whole story of words to make a ridiculously long problem, but hey, you're reading this, so you probably have nothing better to be doing. ;)
Mine was probably on the 2024 MathCounts State Target Round Problem 8, where I wrote my answer as a fraction instead of a percent, which cost me a trip to Nationals that year.
AkshajK ORZ by the way invited me to do MathDash a few months ago and I did try it one day but haven't done it much after (Sorry). Now, I'm getting back into it and finding the format kind of weird. When selecting certain problem type sometimes it lets me pick immediately, other times not. Any fixes?
Two players, Alice and Bob, play the following game, taking turns. In the beginning, the number is written on the board. A move consists of adding either , or to the number written on the board, but only if the chosen number is coprime with the current number (for example, if the current number is , then in a move a player can't choose the number , but he can choose either or ). The player who first writes a perfect square on the board loses. Prove that one of the players has a winning strategy and determine who wins in the game.
An infinite increasing sequence of positive integers is called central if for every positive integer , the arithmetic mean of the first terms of the sequence is equal to .
Show that there exists an infinite sequence of positive integers such that for every central sequence there are infinitely many positive integers with .
Let be a triangle. Let be a circle passing through intersecting at and at . Let be the intersection of and . Further, let and be the intersections of and with the tangent to at . Now, let be the second intersection of and . Then, prove that , , , and are concyclic.
Ok so i never did combinatorics in my life :oops: and i am willing to be able to do P1/P4 combos (or even more)
So yeah how can i start from scratch?
Remark:i don't want compuational combo resources :noo:
Source: ELMO 2019 Problem 1, 2019 ELMO Shortlist N1
Let be a polynomial with integer coefficients such that , and let be an integer. Define and for all integers . Show that there are infinitely many positive integers such that .
Source: Serbian selection contest for the IMO 2025
For an table filled with natural numbers, we say it is a divisor table if:
- the numbers in the -th row are exactly all the divisors of some natural number ,
- the numbers in the -th column are exactly all the divisors of some natural number ,
- for every .
A prime number is given. Determine the smallest natural number , divisible by , such that there exists an divisor table, or prove that such does not exist.
My favorite problems on the state test were target #6 and sprint #29. I loved the aha moment when I saw pascal's triangle on target #6, and even though I got sprint #29 wrong due to a long division error, it was so much fun to use the sum of the factors trick to find the right answer!
Also: My score was 29 with 12 on target and 17 (sad sillies) on sprint, so I didn't make CDR
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Ljviolin11, Apr 1, 2025, 3:03 PM
let the legs of the triangle be and . Then we have Additionally, by the triangle inequality, we know the hypotenuse is less than , and because it is the longest side, it is greater than Also, because the question simply asks for the length of the hypotenuse without "simplest radical form" or "common fraction" at the end of the problem, we know the hypotenuse is an integer. Thus, the only numbers that can be the length of the hypotenuse are ,,,,, and . Plugging values into the equation in line yields
let the legs of the triangle be and . Then we have Additionally, by the triangle inequality, we know the hypotenuse is less than , and because it is the longest side, it is greater than Also, because the question simply asks for the length of the hypotenuse without "simplest radical form" or "common fraction" at the end of the problem, we know the hypotenuse is an integer. Thus, the only numbers that can be the length of the hypotenuse are ,,,,, and . Plugging values into the equation in line yields
bruh even worse sol, calc bash and guess based on answer form
; a^2+b^2=c^2 and a+b = 40-c. Square the second equation. a^2+b^2+2ab=1600+c^2-80c. Cancel out a^2+b^2 and c^2 from both sides since they are equivalent. 2ab = 1600-80c. In the problem we are given that ab/2 = 20 so 2ab=80. Now 1600-80c=80 or c=19.
I randomly added up all the squares from 1 to 2025 and divided that by the sum of all integers 1-2025 (I don't even know why) and somehow got the right answer after doing a bunch of random other things.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by chesswillow, Apr 25, 2025, 3:27 PM
I randomly added up all the squares from 1 to 2025 and divided that by the sum of all integers 1-2025 (I don't even know why) and somehow got the right answer.
I used a method kind of guessing but we can see the number of subsets that have 2025 as the greateset is (Not Blank)
2^2025-1
Then the number of subsets that have 2024 as the greatest is:
2^2024 -1
Then the numbers of subsets that have 2023 as the greatest is:
2^2023-1
We establish a pattern similar to an geometric sequence but not exact.... 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32,1/64,1/128,1/256 So with this pattern we already know that the numbers that count the most are the first 3 numbers that I listed but if you look at it carefully you can see that when you subtract some integer n from n_1+n_2 we see what it is always 1/2^n so we can use this finding to see that is has to be somewhere between 2024>=x>=2023
but we again see that 1/4-1/8=1/8 so we are done and our final answer is
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by sadas123, Apr 5, 2025, 11:09 AM
Add one set with just element 0.
First two sets have average 1/2
Average with two sets of average 2 makes four sets with average 1+1/4
Average with four sets of average 3 makes eight sets with average 2+1/8
...
average is 2024 + 1/ 2^2025,
not needed but you can adjust by removing 0 set to get exact average