Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.

Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.

Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

AIME Problem Series A
Thursday, May 22 - Jul 31

AIME Problem Series B
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
May 1, 2025
0 replies
k i A Letter to MSM
Arr0w   23
N Sep 19, 2022 by scannose
Greetings.

I have seen many posts talking about commonly asked questions, such as finding the value of $0^0$, $\frac{1}{0}$,$\frac{0}{0}$, $\frac{\infty}{\infty}$, why $0.999...=1$ or even expressions of those terms combined as if that would make them defined. I have made this post to answer these questions once and for all, and I politely ask everyone to link this post to threads that are talking about this issue.
[list]
[*]Firstly, the case of $0^0$. It is usually regarded that $0^0=1$, not because this works numerically but because it is convenient to define it this way. You will see the convenience of defining other undefined things later on in this post.

[*]What about $\frac{\infty}{\infty}$? The issue here is that $\infty$ isn't even rigorously defined in this expression. What exactly do we mean by $\infty$? Unless the example in question is put in context in a formal manner, then we say that $\frac{\infty}{\infty}$ is meaningless.

[*]What about $\frac{1}{0}$? Suppose that $x=\frac{1}{0}$. Then we would have $x\cdot 0=0=1$, absurd. A more rigorous treatment of the idea is that $\lim_{x\to0}\frac{1}{x}$ does not exist in the first place, although you will see why in a calculus course. So the point is that $\frac{1}{0}$ is undefined.

[*]What about if $0.99999...=1$? An article from brilliant has a good explanation. Alternatively, you can just use a geometric series. Notice that
\begin{align*}
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{9}{10^n}&=9\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{10^n}=9\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\biggr(\frac{1}{10}\biggr)^n=9\biggr(\frac{\frac{1}{10}}{1-\frac{1}{10}}\biggr)=9\biggr(\frac{\frac{1}{10}}{\frac{9}{10}}\biggr)=9\biggr(\frac{1}{9}\biggr)=\boxed{1}
\end{align*}
[*]What about $\frac{0}{0}$? Usually this is considered to be an indeterminate form, but I would also wager that this is also undefined.
[/list]
Hopefully all of these issues and their corollaries are finally put to rest. Cheers.

2nd EDIT (6/14/22): Since I originally posted this, it has since blown up so I will try to add additional information per the request of users in the thread below.

INDETERMINATE VS UNDEFINED

What makes something indeterminate? As you can see above, there are many things that are indeterminate. While definitions might vary slightly, it is the consensus that the following definition holds: A mathematical expression is be said to be indeterminate if it is not definitively or precisely determined. So how does this make, say, something like $0/0$ indeterminate? In analysis (the theory behind calculus and beyond), limits involving an algebraic combination of functions in an independent variable may often be evaluated by replacing these functions by their limits. However, if the expression obtained after this substitution does not provide sufficient information to determine the original limit, then the expression is called an indeterminate form. For example, we could say that $0/0$ is an indeterminate form.

But we need to more specific, this is still ambiguous. An indeterminate form is a mathematical expression involving at most two of $0$, $1$ or $\infty$, obtained by applying the algebraic limit theorem (a theorem in analysis, look this up for details) in the process of attempting to determine a limit, which fails to restrict that limit to one specific value or infinity, and thus does not determine the limit being calculated. This is why it is called indeterminate. Some examples of indeterminate forms are
\[0/0, \infty/\infty, \infty-\infty, \infty \times 0\]etc etc. So what makes something undefined? In the broader scope, something being undefined refers to an expression which is not assigned an interpretation or a value. A function is said to be undefined for points outside its domain. For example, the function $f:\mathbb{R}^{+}\cup\{0\}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ given by the mapping $x\mapsto \sqrt{x}$ is undefined for $x<0$. On the other hand, $1/0$ is undefined because dividing by $0$ is not defined in arithmetic by definition. In other words, something is undefined when it is not defined in some mathematical context.

WHEN THE WATERS GET MUDDIED

So with this notion of indeterminate and undefined, things get convoluted. First of all, just because something is indeterminate does not mean it is not undefined. For example $0/0$ is considered both indeterminate and undefined (but in the context of a limit then it is considered in indeterminate form). Additionally, this notion of something being undefined also means that we can define it in some way. To rephrase, this means that technically, we can make something that is undefined to something that is defined as long as we define it. I'll show you what I mean.

One example of making something undefined into something defined is the extended real number line, which we define as
\[\overline{\mathbb{R}}=\mathbb{R}\cup \{-\infty,+\infty\}.\]So instead of treating infinity as an idea, we define infinity (positively and negatively, mind you) as actual numbers in the reals. The advantage of doing this is for two reasons. The first is because we can turn this thing into a totally ordered set. Specifically, we can let $-\infty\le a\le \infty$ for each $a\in\overline{\mathbb{R}}$ which means that via this order topology each subset has an infimum and supremum and $\overline{\mathbb{R}}$ is therefore compact. While this is nice from an analytic standpoint, extending the reals in this way can allow for interesting arithmetic! In $\overline{\mathbb{R}}$ it is perfectly OK to say that,
\begin{align*}
a + \infty = \infty + a & = \infty, & a & \neq -\infty \\
a - \infty = -\infty + a & = -\infty, & a & \neq \infty \\
a \cdot (\pm\infty) = \pm\infty \cdot a & = \pm\infty, & a & \in (0, +\infty] \\
a \cdot (\pm\infty) = \pm\infty \cdot a & = \mp\infty, & a & \in [-\infty, 0) \\
\frac{a}{\pm\infty} & = 0, & a & \in \mathbb{R} \\
\frac{\pm\infty}{a} & = \pm\infty, & a & \in (0, +\infty) \\
\frac{\pm\infty}{a} & = \mp\infty, & a & \in (-\infty, 0).
\end{align*}So addition, multiplication, and division are all defined nicely. However, notice that we have some indeterminate forms here which are also undefined,
\[\infty-\infty,\frac{\pm\infty}{\pm\infty},\frac{\pm\infty}{0},0\cdot \pm\infty.\]So while we define certain things, we also left others undefined/indeterminate in the process! However, in the context of measure theory it is common to define $\infty \times 0=0$ as greenturtle3141 noted below. I encourage to reread what he wrote, it's great stuff! As you may notice, though, dividing by $0$ is undefined still! Is there a place where it isn't? Kind of. To do this, we can extend the complex numbers! More formally, we can define this extension as
\[\mathbb{C}^*=\mathbb{C}\cup\{\tilde{\infty}\}\]which we call the Riemann Sphere (it actually forms a sphere, pretty cool right?). As a note, $\tilde{\infty}$ means complex infinity, since we are in the complex plane now. Here's the catch: division by $0$ is allowed here! In fact, we have
\[\frac{z}{0}=\tilde{\infty},\frac{z}{\tilde{\infty}}=0.\]where $\tilde{\infty}/\tilde{\infty}$ and $0/0$ are left undefined. We also have
\begin{align*}
z+\tilde{\infty}=\tilde{\infty}, \forall z\ne -\infty\\
z\times \tilde{\infty}=\tilde{\infty}, \forall z\ne 0
\end{align*}Furthermore, we actually have some nice properties with multiplication that we didn't have before. In $\mathbb{C}^*$ it holds that
\[\tilde{\infty}\times \tilde{\infty}=\tilde{\infty}\]but $\tilde{\infty}-\tilde{\infty}$ and $0\times \tilde{\infty}$ are left as undefined (unless there is an explicit need to change that somehow). One could define the projectively extended reals as we did with $\mathbb{C}^*$, by defining them as
\[{\widehat {\mathbb {R} }}=\mathbb {R} \cup \{\infty \}.\]They behave in a similar way to the Riemann Sphere, with division by $0$ also being allowed with the same indeterminate forms (in addition to some other ones).
23 replies
Arr0w
Feb 11, 2022
scannose
Sep 19, 2022
k i Marathon Threads
LauraZed   0
Jul 2, 2019
Due to excessive spam and inappropriate posts, we have locked the Prealgebra and Beginning Algebra threads.

We will either unlock these threads once we've cleaned them up or start new ones, but for now, do not start new marathon threads for these subjects. Any new marathon threads started while this announcement is up will be immediately deleted.
0 replies
LauraZed
Jul 2, 2019
0 replies
k i Basic Forum Rules and Info (Read before posting)
jellymoop   368
N May 16, 2018 by harry1234
f (Reminder: Do not post Alcumus or class homework questions on this forum. Instructions below.) f
Welcome to the Middle School Math Forum! Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with the rules.

Overview:
[list]
[*] When you're posting a new topic with a math problem, give the topic a detailed title that includes the subject of the problem (not just "easy problem" or "nice problem")
[*] Stay on topic and be courteous.
[*] Hide solutions!
[*] If you see an inappropriate post in this forum, simply report the post and a moderator will deal with it. Don't make your own post telling people they're not following the rules - that usually just makes the issue worse.
[*] When you post a question that you need help solving, post what you've attempted so far and not just the question. We are here to learn from each other, not to do your homework. :P
[*] Avoid making posts just to thank someone - you can use the upvote function instead
[*] Don't make a new reply just to repeat yourself or comment on the quality of others' posts; instead, post when you have a new insight or question. You can also edit your post if it's the most recent and you want to add more information.
[*] Avoid bumping old posts.
[*] Use GameBot to post alcumus questions.
[*] If you need general MATHCOUNTS/math competition advice, check out the threads below.
[*] Don't post other users' real names.
[*] Advertisements are not allowed. You can advertise your forum on your profile with a link, on your blog, and on user-created forums that permit forum advertisements.
[/list]

Here are links to more detailed versions of the rules. These are from the older forums, so you can overlook "Classroom math/Competition math only" instructions.
Posting Guidelines
Update on Basic Forum Rules
What belongs on this forum?
How do I write a thorough solution?
How do I get a problem on the contest page?
How do I study for mathcounts?
Mathcounts FAQ and resources
Mathcounts and how to learn

As always, if you have any questions, you can PM me or any of the other Middle School Moderators. Once again, if you see spam, it would help a lot if you filed a report instead of responding :)

Marathons!
Relays might be a better way to describe it, but these threads definitely go the distance! One person starts off by posting a problem, and the next person comes up with a solution and a new problem for another user to solve. Here's some of the frequently active marathons running in this forum:
[list][*]Algebra
[*]Prealgebra
[*]Proofs
[*]Factoring
[*]Geometry
[*]Counting & Probability
[*]Number Theory[/list]
Some of these haven't received attention in a while, but these are the main ones for their respective subjects. Rather than starting a new marathon, please give the existing ones a shot first.

You can also view marathons via the Marathon tag.

Think this list is incomplete or needs changes? Let the mods know and we'll take a look.
368 replies
jellymoop
May 8, 2015
harry1234
May 16, 2018
Rational Points in n-Dimensional Space
steven_zhang123   0
12 minutes ago
Let \( T = (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) \), where \( x_i \) is rational for \( i = 1, 2, \ldots, n \). A vector \( T \) is called a rational point in \( n \)-dimensional space. Denote the set of all such vectors \( T \) as \( S \). For \( A = (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) \) and \( B = (y_1, y_2, \ldots, y_n) \) in \( S \), define the distance between points \( A \) and \( B \) as \( d(A, B) = \sqrt{(x_1 - y_1)^2 + (x_2 - y_2)^2 + \cdots + (x_n - y_n)^2} \). We say that point \( A \) can move to point \( B \) if and only if there is a unit distance between two points in \( S \).

Prove:
(1) If \( n \leq 4 \), there exists a point that cannot be reached from the origin via a finite number of moves.
(2) If \( n \geq 5 \), any point in \( S \) can be reached from any other point via moves.
0 replies
steven_zhang123
12 minutes ago
0 replies
Inspired by old results
sqing   5
N 18 minutes ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $a,b,c $ be reals such that $a^2+b^2+c^2=3$ .Prove that
$$(1-a)(k-b)(1-c)+abc\ge -k$$Where $ k\geq 1.$
$$(1-a)(1-b)(1-c)+abc\ge -1$$$$(1-a)(1-b)(1-c)-abc\ge -\frac{1}{2}-\sqrt 2$$
5 replies
sqing
Yesterday at 7:36 AM
sqing
18 minutes ago
equation in integers
Pirkuliyev Rovsen   2
N an hour ago by ytChen
Solve in $Z$ the equation $a^2+b=b^{2022}$
2 replies
Pirkuliyev Rovsen
Feb 10, 2025
ytChen
an hour ago
Inequality for Sequences
steven_zhang123   0
2 hours ago
Given a positive number \( t \) and integers \( m, n \geq 2 \), prove that for any \( n \) positive numbers \( a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n \) satisfying \( a_j - a_{j-1} \leq t \) for \( j = 1, 2, \ldots, n \) (with the convention \( a_0 = 0 \)), the following inequality holds:
\[
\sum_{j=1}^n a_j^{2m-1} \leq \frac{mt}{2} \left( \sum_{j=1}^n a_j^{m-1} \right)^2.
\]
0 replies
steven_zhang123
2 hours ago
0 replies
Problem of the day
sultanine   5
N 3 hours ago by valenbb
[center]Every day I will post 3 new problems
one easy, one medium, and one hard.
Please hide your answers so others won't be affected
:D :) :D :) :D
5 replies
sultanine
Yesterday at 5:01 PM
valenbb
3 hours ago
Competitions
CJB19   3
N 3 hours ago by V0305
So, I'm a little bit silly and I didn't even know about the AMC 8 until this year, so I'm curious now. What are the other MSM level competitions? I only really know about AMC 8 & 10, Mathcounts, and AIME.
3 replies
CJB19
Yesterday at 4:02 PM
V0305
3 hours ago
Summer math contest prep
Abby0618   8
N Yesterday at 8:22 PM by ZMB038
School is almost out, so I have a lot of time in the summer. I want to be able to make DHR on AMC 8 in 7th grade

(current 6th grader) and hopefully get an average score in AMC 10. What should I do during the summer to achieve

these goals? For context, I have many books from AOPS, have already taken the Intro to Algebra A course, and took

AMC 8 for the first time as a 6th grader. If there are any challenging math problems you think would benefit learning,

please post them here. Thank you! :-D
8 replies
Abby0618
Thursday at 8:52 PM
ZMB038
Yesterday at 8:22 PM
Tricky problem
VivaanKam   1
N Yesterday at 6:45 PM by iwastedmyusername
$\text{Mrs. Lee announced that any student who scored }90\text{ or higher on the final test would receive an }A\text{ for the class.}$
$\text{Consider the following statements:}$

$\text{Lauren scored an }80\text{ on the final and received an }A\text{ for the class.}$
$\text{Lauren scored a }90\text{ on the final and received an }A\text{ for the class.}$
$\text{Lauren scored an }80\text{ on the final and did not receive an }A\text{ for the class.}$
$\text{Lauren scored a }90\text{ on the final and did not receive an }A\text{ for the class.}$

$\text{How many of the statements above are possibly true?}$

I got this problem wrong when I first tried it. :(
1 reply
VivaanKam
Yesterday at 6:36 PM
iwastedmyusername
Yesterday at 6:45 PM
drawn to scale
A7456321   21
N Yesterday at 6:18 PM by Soupboy0
would you guys say that the diagrams drawn on math comp papers are usually drawn to scale (or at least close)? i have found that they are usually pretty accurate even tho the test always says that they are not necessarily to scale
21 replies
A7456321
May 15, 2025
Soupboy0
Yesterday at 6:18 PM
Interesting Combinatorics Problem
Ro.Is.Te.   2
N Yesterday at 4:57 PM by sultanine
Amanda has $1000$ red marbles, $2000$ yellow marbles, $3000$ green marbles, and $4000$ blue marbles. If Amanda takes the marbles one by one without replacing them until the $3999th$ marble. Then the probability that the $4000th$ marble is red is?
2 replies
Ro.Is.Te.
Yesterday at 11:49 AM
sultanine
Yesterday at 4:57 PM
9 How many squares do you have memorized
LXC007   93
N Yesterday at 4:25 PM by ADus
How many squares have you memorized. I have 1-20

Edit: to clarify i mean positive squares from 1 so if you say ten you mean you memorized the squares 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and 10
93 replies
LXC007
May 17, 2025
ADus
Yesterday at 4:25 PM
A Variety of Math Problems to solve
FJH07   43
N Yesterday at 4:12 PM by CJB19
Hi, so people can post different math problems that they think are hard, and I will post some (I think middle school math level) problems so that the community can help solve them. :)
43 replies
FJH07
May 22, 2025
CJB19
Yesterday at 4:12 PM
MATHCOUNTS
ILOVECATS127   51
N Yesterday at 3:59 PM by CJB19
Hi,

I am looking to get on my school MATHCOUNTS team next year in 7th grade, and I had a question: Where do the school round questions come from? (Sprint, Chapter, Team, Countdown)
51 replies
ILOVECATS127
May 7, 2025
CJB19
Yesterday at 3:59 PM
p6 solution lol
Bummer12345   15
N Yesterday at 3:44 PM by xHypotenuse
apparently, nobody solved target p6 but looking back it really wasn't too bad
[quote=2025 target p6]
Person A and Person B are playing tennis, and Person A has a 70% chance of winning each individual point. To win a tennis game, one needs at least 4 points and at least a 2-point lead over the other person. What is the probability that Person A wins?[/quote]
(I forgor the names)

sol

what actually happened during the test
15 replies
Bummer12345
May 13, 2025
xHypotenuse
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
f(2) = 7, find all integer functions [Taiwan 2014 Quizzes]
v_Enhance   59
N May 18, 2025 by MathIQ.
Find all increasing functions $f$ from the nonnegative integers to the integers satisfying $f(2)=7$ and \[ f(mn) = f(m) + f(n) + f(m)f(n) \] for all nonnegative integers $m$ and $n$.
59 replies
v_Enhance
Jul 18, 2014
MathIQ.
May 18, 2025
f(2) = 7, find all integer functions [Taiwan 2014 Quizzes]
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mr.Sharkman
501 posts
#48
Y by
Let $f(m)+1 = g(m).$ Then, the condition is equivalent to having $g(mn) = g(m)g(n).$
Now, we see that $g(2) = 8.$ Now, notice that, by the density of the rational numbers, since $g(x)^{m} < 8^{n}$ if and only if $x^{m} < 2^{n},$ we need to have that $g(x) = x^{a}$ for some $a.$ So, $g(x) = x^{3},$ and thus $f(x) = x^{3}-1.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
dolphinday
1328 posts
#49
Y by
Add $1$ on both sides to get $f(mn) + 1 = (f(m) + 1)(f(n) + 1)$. Then let $g(x) = f(x) + 1$ to get $g(mn) = g(m)g(n)$.
Then it is well known that the solutions to $g(mn) = g(m)g(n)$(from $\mathbb R \to \mathbb R)$ are
i. $g \equiv 0$,
ii. $g(x) \equiv e^{h(\log |x|)}$ with $f(0) = 0$, and
iii. $g(x) \equiv \textit{sign}(x) e^{h(\log |x|)}$
where $\textit{sign}(x) \in \{1,0,-1\}$.
where $h$ is an additive function. However since this problem is over $\mathbb Z$ we get that $h$ is linear and thus $f(x) = x^k$ for some $k$. This is because the second and third equations are equivalent(since we're dealing with nonnegatives) and the first equation can't be true since $g(2) = 8$. Hence we have $g(2) = 2^k \implies k = 3$ so $g(x) = x^3 \implies f(x) = x^3 - 1$.

(storage)
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by dolphinday, Jun 15, 2024, 4:30 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Jndd
1417 posts
#50 • 1 Y
Y by OronSH
$f(x)=x^3-1$ is the answer, and it is easy to check that this satisfies our equation.

Let $g(n)=f(n)+1$, so we have \[g(mn)=f(mn)+1=1+f(m)+f(n)+f(m)f(n)=(f(m)+1)(f(n)+1)=g(m)g(n).\]Then, $g(2n)=g(2)g(n)=8n$, which gives $g(2^kn)=2^{3k}g(n)$. Since $g(2)=g(2)g(1)$, we get $g(1)=1$, which then gives us $g(2^k)=2^{3k}g(1)=2^{3k}$. Suppose there is some $a$ such that $g(a)\neq a^3$, so let $g(a)=a^3+c$. Suppose $c\geq 1$. Then, let $2^{k-1}\leq a^n<2^k$ for some integer $n$. Then, we would have $2^k\leq 2a^n<2^{k+1}$, giving $a^n<2^k\leq 2a^n$. Thus, singe $g$ is strictly increasing, we must have \[(a^3+c)^n=g(a)^n=g(a^n)<g(2^k)=(2^k)^3\leq (2a^n)^3,\]which then gives us \[a^3+c<8^{\frac1n}a^3.\]Clearly, when we choose $n$ to be sufficiently large, $8^{\frac1n}a^3$ becomes arbitrarily close to $a^3$, meaning this inequality is false.

Now, suppose $g(a)=a^3+c$ where $c\leq -1$. Again, for some $n,$ we can bound some $2^k$ such that $\frac{a^n}{2} \leq 2^k < a^n$. Then, since $g$ is strictly increasing, we have \[\left(\frac{a^n}{2}\right)^{3} \leq (2^k)^3 = g(2^k) < g(a^n)=g(a)^n=(a^3+c)^n,\]which gives us \[\frac{a^3}{8^{\frac1n}}<a^3+c.\]Then, once we take $n$ to be sufficiently large, this inequality must be false.

Therefore, we must have $g(x)=x^3$ for all $x$, giving $f(x)=x^3-1$, as desired.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Markas
150 posts
#51
Y by
Firstly we should add +1 to both sides and we get $f(mn) + 1 = (f(m) + 1)(f(n) + 1)$. Let $g(x) = f(x) + 1$. Plugging in the equation we got, we have $g(mn) = g(m)g(n)$ and g is multiplicative. We have that $g(2) = f(2) + 1 = 8$. Now $g(4) = g(2)g(2) = 8^2$ and every time we multiply by g(2) $\Rightarrow$ $g(2^k) = g(2)^k = 8^k$. Also g is multiplicative, monotone increasing. Now let p be a prime and pick positive integers x and y, such that $p^x>2^y \iff \frac{y}{x} < \log_2 p$ $\Rightarrow$ $g(p)^x = g(p^x) \ge g(2^y) = g(2)^y = 2^{3y}$ $\Rightarrow$ $g(p) > 2^{3\frac{y}{x}}$. Since rationals are dense in R we can take LHS closest to $p^3$ $\Rightarrow$ $g(p) \ge p^3$. Similarly, we can get an upper bound on $g(p)$ closest to $p^3$ and we get $g(p) < p^3 + 1$, which gives us that $g(p) \le p^3 \Rightarrow g(p) = p^3$. So now we have $g(p) = p^3$ for all primes p, we get that $g(x) = x^3$ for all $x \in Z_0^+$ since g is multiplicative, from which we have that $f(x)=x^3-1$ is the only possible solution. Lastly we should check that this works and $f(m) + f(n) + f(m)f(n) = m^3-1+n^3-1+(m^3-1)(n^3-1) = (mn)^3+1-m^3-n^3+m^3+n^3-2 = (mn)^3-1 = f(mn)$, which is obviously true so we are ready.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
kotmhn
60 posts
#52
Y by
cusofay wrote:
Now the problem is trivial by Erdos theorem.
Could you tell me what erdos theorem is? i am unable to find anything by that name that can be applied here.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
N3bula
288 posts
#53
Y by
Add $1$ to both sides, $f(mn)+1=(f(m)+1)(f(n)+1)$, let $g(n)=f(n)+1$, thus we get that $g(mn)=g(m)g(n)$. This function is defined on the primes. Suppose there is a prime
such that $g(p)>p^3$, thus we get by taking large enough powers of $2$ and $p$ we can get a contradiction to the strictly increasing, a similar arguement works for
when $g(p)<p^3$, thus we get $g(p)=p^3$ for all $p$, so we get $f(n)=n^3-1$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
bjump
1032 posts
#54
Y by
Define $g(x)=f(x)+1$ then the equation becomes $g(mn)=g(m)g(n)$. We get that $g(0)=g(0)g(2)$ so $g(0)=0$, $g(2)=g(1)g(2)$ so $g(1)=1$, and $g(2)=8$. Now note that $g$ is multiplicative so $g(2^n)= 8^n$. Suppose there is a prime $p$ such that $g(p)  \neq p^3$ then if we take $m$, $n$ such that $2^{n-1} < p^m < 2^n$ then $8^{n-1} < g(p)^{3m}, p^{3m} < 8^n$ for all $m$, $n$ such that the first inequality is true. However if $m$ is large enough $\tfrac{g(p)^{3m}}{p^{3m}}$ will either be greater than $8$ or less than $\tfrac{1}{8}$ which contradicts $8^{n-1} < g(p)^{3m}, p^{3m} < 8^n$ so $g(p)=p^3$ for all primes $p$. Now due to multiplicativity $g(m)=m^3$ for all $m$, or $f(m)=m^3-1$ and we are finished.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ilikeminecraft
658 posts
#55
Y by
Take $n = 1, n = 0,$ to get $f(1) = 0, f(0) = -1.$ Let $f(x) = g(x) - 1.$ This gives $g(mn) = g(m)g(n),$ and $g(0) = 0, g(1) = 1, g(2) = 8.$

By induction, $f(2^k) = 2^{3k}.$ By the strictly increasing condition, $x^m \leq 2^n\iff g(x)^m \leq 2^{3n}.$ Let $h(x) = \ln g(x).$ Then, $m \ln x < \ln 2$ if and only if $mh(x) < 3n \ln 2.$ Thus, $\ln x < \frac nm \ln 2\iff h(x) < 3 \frac nm \ln 2.$ Since rationals are dense in the reals and this is an iff statement, we require $h(x) = 3\ln x\implies g(x) = x^3\implies f(x) = x^3 - 1.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
eg4334
636 posts
#56
Y by
Let $g(x)=f(x)+1$, which translates into $g(mn)=g(m)g(n)$. We have $g(2)=8$ and clearly $g(1)=1$ and $g(0)=0$ from the strictly increasing condition. Now the multiplicity translates to $g(2^n)=8^n$. The key claim is that $g(p)=p^3$. We assume FTSOC that there exists a prime $p$ where this is not true. Now the two inequalities must be equivalent: $2^a > p^b$ and $f(2^a) > f(p^b) \implies 8^a > g(p)^b$. Now we have $\frac{a}{b} > \frac{\log{p}}{\log{2}}, \frac{a}{b} > \frac{\log{g(p)}}{\log{8}}$. This gives a contradiction by choosing a sufficient $a, b$ by density of rational numbers. Hence by multiplicity $g(x)=x^3$ and $f(x) = \boxed{x^3-1}$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Marcus_Zhang
980 posts
#57
Y by
Attempt 2.

@below: Thanks for pointing that out. Fixed.
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by Marcus_Zhang, Mar 15, 2025, 3:06 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Burmf
32 posts
#58
Y by
Marcus_Zhang wrote:
Let $a = e^x$ and $b  = e^y$. Notice that we now have $g(e^{x+y}) = g(e^{x})g(e^{y})$. Writing $h(x) = g(e^{x})$ we find that $h(x+y) = h(x) + h(y)$.
Since $a$ and $b$ are positive integers, the function $h$ is neither continous nor it is like $Q$ or $Z$. So you can't assume that $h$ is linear. One simple counterexample is $g(p) = 1$ for $ p > 2 $ primes and $g(2) = 8$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Maximilian113
575 posts
#59
Y by
Let $g(x)=f(x)+1,$ therefore $g(x)$ is multiplicative. Note that $g(2)=8,$ and we can easily get $g(1)=1, g(0)=0.$

Now, we claim that $g(x)=x^3.$ For the sake of a contradiction, assume that there is some prime $p$ such that $g(p) \neq p^3.$ Then $$2^a>p^b \iff f(2^a)>f(p^b) \implies \frac{a}{b} > \frac{\log p}{\log 2}, \frac{a}{b} \iff \frac{\log g(p)}{\log 8}.$$But by density of rational numbers, this is not true for all $a, b.$ Therefore $g(p)=p^3$ for all primes $p$ and by the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic $g(x)=x^3$ for all $x.$ This solution clearly works.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
lpieleanu
3002 posts
#60
Y by
Solution
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ilikeminecraft
658 posts
#61
Y by
$m = 0$ tells us that $f(0) = -1.$ $m = 1$ tells us that $f(1) = 0.$ Define $g(x) = f(x) + 1.$ Thus, we have that $g(mn) = g(m)g(n).$ Hence, we have that $g(0) = 0, g(1) = 1, g(2) = 8.$ We have that $g(2^n) = 8^n$ by induction. Now, we have that $x^m < 2^n$ if and only if $g(x)^m < 8^n,$ since $g$ is strictly increasing. Now, we take logarithm of both sides to get that $\log_2(x) < \frac nm, \log_8(g(x)) < \frac nm.$ However, note that between every real number, there is a rational number, and thus it follows that $\log_2(x) = \log_8(g(x)) \implies g(x) = x^3 \implies f(x) = x^3 - 1.$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MathIQ.
44 posts
#62
Y by
Solution:

We are looking for increasing functions $f: \mathbb{N}_0 \to \mathbb{Z}$ satisfying $f(2) = 7$ and $f(mn) = f(m) + f(n) + f(m)f(n)$ for all nonnegative integers $m$ and $n$.

The functional equation can be rewritten as $f(mn) + 1 = (f(m) + 1)(f(n) + 1)$.
Let $g(n) = f(n) + 1$. Then the equation becomes $g(mn) = g(m)g(n)$.
Also, since $f$ is increasing, $m < n \implies f(m) \le f(n) \implies g(m) \le g(n)$.
We are given $f(2) = 7$, so $g(2) = f(2) + 1 = 7 + 1 = 8$.
The domain is nonnegative integers, so we need to consider $n=0$.
$g(0 \cdot m) = g(0) = g(0)g(m)$.
If there exists $m$ such that $g(m) \neq 1$, then $g(0) = 0$.
$f(0) = g(0) - 1 = 0 - 1 = -1$.

Consider $n=1$.
$g(1 \cdot m) = g(m) = g(1)g(m)$.
If there exists $m$ such that $g(m) \neq 0$, then $g(1) = 1$.
$f(1) = g(1) - 1 = 1 - 1 = 0$.

Since $f$ is increasing, for $0 < 1 < 2$, we have $f(0) \le f(1) \le f(2)$, so $-1 \le 0 \le 7$, which is true.

Now consider $g(mn) = g(m)g(n)$ for $m, n \in \mathbb{N}_0$.
We have $g(0) = 0, g(1) = 1, g(2) = 8$.
For $n > 0$, $g(n) = n^k$ for some constant $k$.
$g(2) = 2^k = 8 \implies k = 3$.
So $g(n) = n^3$ for $n > 0$.
$f(n) = g(n) - 1 = n^3 - 1$ for $n > 0$.
Also, $f(0) = 0^3 - 1 = -1$, and $f(1) = 1^3 - 1 = 0$.

Let's check if $f(n) = n^3 - 1$ is increasing for $n \ge 0$.
For $n_2 > n_1 \ge 0$, $n_2^3 > n_1^3$, so $n_2^3 - 1 > n_1^3 - 1$, which means $f(n_2) > f(n_1)$.

Check the functional equation:
$f(mn) = (mn)^3 - 1 = m^3 n^3 - 1$.
$f(m) + f(n) + f(m)f(n) = (m^3 - 1) + (n^3 - 1) + (m^3 - 1)(n^3 - 1)$
$= m^3 - 1 + n^3 - 1 + m^3 n^3 - m^3 - n^3 + 1 = m^3 n^3 - 1$.
The functional equation is satisfied.

Final Answer: The final answer is $\boxed{f(n) = n^3 - 1}$
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a