We have your learning goals covered with Spring and Summer courses available. Enroll today!

Contests & Programs AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
3 M G
BBookmark  VNew Topic kLocked
Contests & Programs AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
3 M G
BBookmark  VNew Topic kLocked
G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a March Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Mar 2, 2025
March is the month for State MATHCOUNTS competitions! Kudos to everyone who participated in their local chapter competitions and best of luck to all going to State! Join us on March 11th for a Math Jam devoted to our favorite Chapter competition problems! Are you interested in training for MATHCOUNTS? Be sure to check out our AMC 8/MATHCOUNTS Basics and Advanced courses.

Are you ready to level up with Olympiad training? Registration is open with early bird pricing available for our WOOT programs: MathWOOT (Levels 1 and 2), CodeWOOT, PhysicsWOOT, and ChemWOOT. What is WOOT? WOOT stands for Worldwide Online Olympiad Training and is a 7-month high school math Olympiad preparation and testing program that brings together many of the best students from around the world to learn Olympiad problem solving skills. Classes begin in September!

Do you have plans this summer? There are so many options to fit your schedule and goals whether attending a summer camp or taking online classes, it can be a great break from the routine of the school year. Check out our summer courses at AoPS Online, or if you want a math or language arts class that doesn’t have homework, but is an enriching summer experience, our AoPS Virtual Campus summer camps may be just the ticket! We are expanding our locations for our AoPS Academies across the country with 15 locations so far and new campuses opening in Saratoga CA, Johns Creek GA, and the Upper West Side NY. Check out this page for summer camp information.

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]March 5th (Wednesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, HCSSiM Math Jam 2025. Amber Verser, Assistant Director of the Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics, will host an information session about HCSSiM, a summer program for high school students.
[*]March 6th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar on Math Competitions from elementary through high school. Join us for an enlightening session that demystifies the world of math competitions and helps you make informed decisions about your contest journey.
[*]March 11th (Tuesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS Chapter Discussion MATH JAM. AoPS instructors will discuss some of their favorite problems from the MATHCOUNTS Chapter Competition. All are welcome!
[*]March 13th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar about Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus. Transform your summer into an unforgettable learning adventure! From elementary through high school, we offer dynamic summer camps featuring topics in mathematics, language arts, and competition preparation - all designed to fit your schedule and ignite your passion for learning.[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Friday, Mar 28 - Jul 18
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Jul 8
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21


Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jul 20
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 16 - Jun 8
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Monday, Mar 17 - Jun 9
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Tuesday, Mar 4 - Aug 12
Sunday, Mar 23 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Mar 16 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 23 - Aug 3
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Sunday, Mar 16 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Wednesday, Mar 5 - May 21
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Sunday, Mar 30 - Oct 5
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jun 15
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Tuesday, Mar 4 - May 20
Monday, Mar 31 - Jun 23
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Monday, Mar 24 - Jun 16
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Sunday, Mar 30 - Jun 22
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Mar 2, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
9 Three concurrent chords
v_Enhance   4
N 2 hours ago by cosmicgenius
Three distinct circles $\Omega_1$, $\Omega_2$, $\Omega_3$ cut three common chords concurrent at $X$. Consider two distinct circles $\Gamma_1$, $\Gamma_2$ which are internally tangent to all $\Omega_i$. Determine, with proof, which of the following two statements is true.

(1) $X$ is the insimilicenter of $\Gamma_1$ and $\Gamma_2$
(2) $X$ is the exsimilicenter of $\Gamma_1$ and $\Gamma_2$.
4 replies
v_Enhance
Yesterday at 8:45 PM
cosmicgenius
2 hours ago
Integral with dt
RenheMiResembleRice   2
N 2 hours ago by RenheMiResembleRice
Source: Yanxue Lu
Solve the attached:
2 replies
RenheMiResembleRice
6 hours ago
RenheMiResembleRice
2 hours ago
Show these 2 circles are tangent to each other.
MTA_2024   1
N 2 hours ago by MTA_2024
A, B, C, and O are four points in the plane such that
\(\angle ABC > 90^\circ\)
and
\( OA = OB = OC \).

Let \( D \) be a point on \( (AB) \), and let \( (d) \) be a line passing through \( D \) such that
\( (AC) \perp (DC) \)
and
\( (d) \perp (AO) \).

The line \( (d) \) intersects \( (AC) \) at \( E \) and the circumcircle of triangle \( ABC \) at \( F \) (\( F \neq A \)).

Show that the circumcircles of triangles \( BEF \) and \( CFD \) are tangent at \( F \).
1 reply
MTA_2024
Yesterday at 1:12 PM
MTA_2024
2 hours ago
Inequality with real numbers
JK1603JK   0
2 hours ago
Source: unknown
Let a,b,c are real numbers. Prove that (a^3+b^3+c^3+3abc)^4+(a+b+c)^3(a+b-c)^3(-a+b+c)^3(a-b+c)^3>=0
0 replies
JK1603JK
2 hours ago
0 replies
Find min
hunghd8   7
N 2 hours ago by hunghd8
Let $a,b,c$ be nonnegative real numbers such that $ a+b+c\geq 2+abc $. Find min
$$P=a^2+b^2+c^2.$$
7 replies
hunghd8
Yesterday at 12:10 PM
hunghd8
2 hours ago
inequality marathon
EthanWYX2009   190
N 2 hours ago by EthanWYX2009
There is an inequality marathon now, but the problem is too hard for me to solve, let's start a new one here, please post problems that is not too difficult.
------
P1.
Find the maximum value of ${M}$, such that for $\forall a,b,c\in\mathbb R_+,$
$$a^3+b^3+c^3-3abc\geqslant M(a^2b+b^2c+c^2a-3abc).$$
190 replies
EthanWYX2009
May 21, 2023
EthanWYX2009
2 hours ago
Find interger root
Zuyong   1
N 3 hours ago by Zuyong
Source: ?
Find $(k,m)\in \mathbb{Z}$ satisfying $$9 k^4 + 30 k^3 + 44 k^2 m + 105 k^2 + 20 k m - 120 k + 36 m^2 + 80 m - 240=0$$
1 reply
Zuyong
Oct 24, 2024
Zuyong
3 hours ago
hard..........
Noname23   0
3 hours ago
problem
0 replies
Noname23
3 hours ago
0 replies
Geometry solutions needed of pathfinder senior
SHIVAM_OP-IMO2025   1
N 3 hours ago by S.Ragnork1729
Someone plzz share pathfinder senior by vikas tiwari solutions..
1 reply
SHIVAM_OP-IMO2025
3 hours ago
S.Ragnork1729
3 hours ago
funny title placeholder
pikapika007   46
N 3 hours ago by aliz
Source: USAJMO 2025/6
Let $S$ be a set of integers with the following properties:
[list]
[*] $\{ 1, 2, \dots, 2025 \} \subseteq S$.
[*] If $a, b \in S$ and $\gcd(a, b) = 1$, then $ab \in S$.
[*] If for some $s \in S$, $s + 1$ is composite, then all positive divisors of $s + 1$ are in $S$.
[/list]
Prove that $S$ contains all positive integers.
46 replies
pikapika007
Yesterday at 12:10 PM
aliz
3 hours ago
new playlist in Olympiad Geometry Channel
Plane_geometry_youtuber   3
N 3 hours ago by SHIVAM_OP-IMO2025
Hi,

I create a new playlist called "Problems from Audience". I will put my solution of the problems from audience into this playlist. Welcome to send me your problems and doubts.

https://www.youtube.com/@OlympiadGeometry-2024

my email: planery.geometry@gmail.com
3 replies
Plane_geometry_youtuber
Jan 28, 2025
SHIVAM_OP-IMO2025
3 hours ago
Scary Binomial Coefficient Sum
EpicBird08   31
N 3 hours ago by john0512
Source: USAMO 2025/5
Determine, with proof, all positive integers $k$ such that $$\frac{1}{n+1} \sum_{i=0}^n \binom{n}{i}^k$$is an integer for every positive integer $n.$
31 replies
EpicBird08
Yesterday at 11:59 AM
john0512
3 hours ago
Mathroots
Ruegerbyrd   0
4 hours ago
Has anyone gotten acceptances from MIT's Mathroots yet? Did they ever say they wouldn't send letters to anyone unless accepted?
0 replies
Ruegerbyrd
4 hours ago
0 replies
[TEST RELEASED] Mock Geometry Test for College Competitions
Bluesoul   16
N 4 hours ago by lord_of_the_rook
Hi AOPSers,

I have finished writing a mock geometry test for fun and practice for the real college competitions like HMMT/PUMaC/CMIMC... There would be 10 questions and you should finish the test in 60 minutes, the test would be close to the actual test (hopefully). You could sign up under this thread, PM me your answers!. The submission would close on March 31st at 11:59PM PST.

I would create a private discussion forum so everyone could discuss after finishing the test. This is the first mock I've written, please sign up and enjoy geometry!!

~Bluesoul

Leaderboard
16 replies
Bluesoul
Feb 24, 2025
lord_of_the_rook
4 hours ago
combo j3 :blobheart:
rhydon516   20
N Yesterday at 8:51 PM by llddmmtt1
Source: USAJMO 2025/3
Let $m$ and $n$ be positive integers, and let $\mathcal R$ be a $2m\times 2n$ grid of unit squares.

A domino is a $1\times2$ or $2\times1$ rectangle. A subset $S$ of grid squares in $\mathcal R$ is domino-tileable if dominoes can be placed to cover every square of $S$ exactly once with no domino extending outside of $S$. Note: The empty set is domino tileable.

An up-right path is a path from the lower-left corner of $\mathcal R$ to the upper-right corner of $\mathcal R$ formed by exactly $2m+2n$ edges of the grid squares.

Determine, with proof, in terms of $m$ and $n$, the number of up-right paths that divide $\mathcal R$ into two domino-tileable subsets.
20 replies
rhydon516
Thursday at 12:08 PM
llddmmtt1
Yesterday at 8:51 PM
combo j3 :blobheart:
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: USAJMO 2025/3
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
rhydon516
536 posts
#1 • 7 Y
Y by KevinYang2.71, Pengu14, vincentwant, ihatemath123, MathRook7817, ESAOPS, LostDreams
Let $m$ and $n$ be positive integers, and let $\mathcal R$ be a $2m\times 2n$ grid of unit squares.

A domino is a $1\times2$ or $2\times1$ rectangle. A subset $S$ of grid squares in $\mathcal R$ is domino-tileable if dominoes can be placed to cover every square of $S$ exactly once with no domino extending outside of $S$. Note: The empty set is domino tileable.

An up-right path is a path from the lower-left corner of $\mathcal R$ to the upper-right corner of $\mathcal R$ formed by exactly $2m+2n$ edges of the grid squares.

Determine, with proof, in terms of $m$ and $n$, the number of up-right paths that divide $\mathcal R$ into two domino-tileable subsets.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by rhydon516, Thursday at 12:09 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
rhydon516
536 posts
#2
Y by
We claim the answer is $\boxed{\binom{m+n}{m}^2}$. Color $\mathcal R$ in a black-and-white checkerboard pattern such that the lower left square is black. Suppose an up-right path $P$ splits $\mathcal R$ into two subsets $S$ and $S'$ such that $S$ is below $P$. Call a subset balanced if there are an equal number of black and white squares.

Claim 1: $S$ and $S'$ are tileable iff $S$ is balanced.

Proof: Since $\mathcal R$ itself is balanced and rotating it by $180^\circ$ swaps $S$ and $S'$, it suffices to only consider $S$. Note that dominoes each cover exactly one black and one white square, so $S$ being tileable implies $S$ is balanced.

We will proceed with the converse by attempting to remove a domino from $S$ such that $S$ can still be traced by a new up-right path. Indeed, so long as $P$ contains a sequence of $\uparrow\rightarrow\rightarrow$ or $\uparrow\uparrow\rightarrow$, we can replace these with $\rightarrow\rightarrow\uparrow$ and $\rightarrow\uparrow\uparrow$, respectively, and effectively remove a domino (this also preserves balanced-ness). Repeating this until we reach the empty set suffices, as we can reconstruct using the sequence of domino removal. The only cases where this fails is when $P$ forms a staircase and remains on the upper or left edges of $\mathcal R$ for at most one edge each. However, we can trivially observe that $S$ is then unbalanced, since if the largest diagonal in $S$ has $k$ squares (which must be of the same color), $k+(k-2)+\cdots>(k-1)+(k-3)+\cdots$. $\square$

Assign coordinates to the gridline intersections such that the lower left corner is $(0,0)$ and the upper right is $(2m,2n)$. Assign each $\rightarrow$ move with starting point $(x,y)$ a two-letter designation, where the first letter is $o$ or $e$ depending on the parity of $x+y$ and the second letter depends on the parity of $x$. (I blame this naming system on leo; he was making some really weird sounds :P)

Claim 2: $S$ is balanced iff there are an equal number of $\rightarrow$'s with starting letter $o$ and $e$.

Proof: Consider $S$ as a union of multiple columns of squares, each topped with a $\rightarrow$. Upon inspection, $oe$'s give one more black square than white square, while $eo$'s give one more white square. There are an even number of squares, and therefore equal number of black and white squares, under an $oo$ or $ee$. Thus, for $S$ to be balanced, there must be an equal number of $oe$'s and $eo$'s; but since there are also an equal number of odd-numbered and even-numbered columns, we must have $oe+ee=eo+oo$, so $ee=oo$ and $oe+oo=eo+ee$, as desired. Reversing the logic gives the converse. $\square$

We finish by splitting moves into two sets based on the parity of $x+y$ and then ordering $m~\rightarrow$'s amongst the $m+n$ moves in each set, giving the desired $\tbinom{m+n}{m}^2$ paths. $\square$

unfortunately, I got everything except the proof for the second claim and instead attempted a different, much more complicated parity argument :( (how many points would that be? hopefully graders aren't too harsh)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
BS2012
932 posts
#3 • 1 Y
Y by bachkieu
Spelt 2 hours on this to no avail
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
miguel00
584 posts
#4
Y by
How many points for getting correct formula + correct bijection but couldn't prove that bijection?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Pengu14
433 posts
#5
Y by
BS2012 wrote:
Spelt 2 hours on this to no avail

same :wallbash_red:

I should've spent that time on p2
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
bachkieu
130 posts
#6
Y by
oops lmao
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by bachkieu, Thursday at 12:17 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
miguel00
584 posts
#7 • 2 Y
Y by bachkieu, Pengu14
@above No there are 9
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by miguel00, Thursday at 12:15 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
bjump
986 posts
#8
Y by
would say this kil,led my sweep but I spent 4 hours 29 minutes and 40 seconds solving p1 and p2 so it wasn't really the problems fault is was more of my own fault
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ostriches88
1524 posts
#9
Y by
MAN this test was so free how did i throw aime so bad
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
KevinChen_Yay
203 posts
#10
Y by
did any sol include a condition for a rectangular grid to be domino tileable? i just did that to try to get a 0+ but prob not right
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ihatemath123
3439 posts
#11 • 5 Y
Y by Pengu14, bachkieu, vincentwant, awesomeguy856, OronSH
The answer is spoiler.

Color the edges of any up-right path blue and orange in alternating color, starting from blue. Call an up-right path good if there are there are exactly $m$ blue horizontal edges and $n$ blue vertical edges. We claim the good paths are precisely the ones we're looking for. The answer follows by counting the number of ways to assign the blue edges as vertical/horizontal and the number of ways to assign the orange edges as vertical/horizontal, separately.

We can redefine good paths for convenience. In particular, suppose we color the gridlines as follows:
[asy]
pen col;
for(int x =0; x<6; ++x) {
    for(int y = 0; y <=4; ++y) {
        if((x+y)%2 == 0) {
        	col = royalblue;
        }
        else {
        	col = orange;
        }
        draw((x,y)--(x+1,y), linewidth(3)+col);
    }
}
for(int x =0; x<=6; ++x) {
    for(int y = 0; y <4; ++y) {
        if((x+y)%2 == 0) {
        	col = royalblue;
        }
        else {
        	col = orange;
        }
        draw((x,y)--(x,y+1), linewidth(3)+col);
    }
}
for(int x =0; x<=6; ++x) {
    for(int y = 0; y <=4; ++y) {
        dot((x,y), black+5);
    }
}
[/asy]
Observe that if we color any up-right path as previously mentioned, the colors of the up-right path perfectly match up with the coloring of this grid. So, a good up-right path is one that contains $m$ blue horizontal edges and $n$ blue vertical edges in the coloring above. We are now ready to show necessity/sufficiency.

We first show that only good paths work. For each vertical edge $v$ on the right side of the up-right path, consider the square $s$ to its left, and assign $v$ to the domino containing square $s$. Each domino underneath the path gets assigned one blue edge and one orange edge. Similarly, for each vertical edge $v$ on the left side of the up-right path, consider the square $s$ to its right, and assign $v$ to the domino containing $s$. These two assignments ensure that every vertical edge not on the path is assigned to a domino, and each domino gets one orange edge and one blue edge. Since there are an equal number of orange and blue vertical edges in the grid altogether, it follows that, on the path, there must be an equal number of orange and blue vertical edges. Similar reasoning shows that there must be an equal number of orange and blue horizontal edges.

Now, we construct a domino tiling underneath any good path. We use induction. In "most" paths, there exists a URR or UUR sequence, allowing us to place a domino underneath the path and tile an up-right path with less area underneath:
[asy]
fill((3,2)--(5,2)--(5,3)--(3,3)--cycle, mediumgray);
draw((0,0)--(0,1)--(2,1)--(2,2)--(3,2)--(3,3)--(5,3)--(5,4)--(6,4), black+linewidth(9));
draw((0,0)--(0,1)--(2,1)--(2,2)--(3,2)--(3,3)--(5,3)--(5,4)--(6,4), white+linewidth(6));
pen col;
for(int x =0; x<6; ++x) {
    for(int y = 0; y <=4; ++y) {
        if((x+y)%2 == 0) {
        	col = royalblue;
        }
        else {
        	col = orange;
        }
        draw((x,y)--(x+1,y), linewidth(3)+col);
    }
}
for(int x =0; x<=6; ++x) {
    for(int y = 0; y <4; ++y) {
        if((x+y)%2 == 0) {
        	col = royalblue;
        }
        else {
        	col = orange;
        }
        draw((x,y)--(x,y+1), linewidth(3)+col);
    }
}
for(int x =0; x<=6; ++x) {
    for(int y = 0; y <=4; ++y) {
        dot((x,y), black+5);
    }
}
[/asy]
Observe that the new path underneath is still good. The only paths without a URR or UUR sequence are those that look something like this:
[asy]
draw((0,0)--(3,0)--(3,1)--(4,1)--(4,2)--(5,2)--(5,3)--(6,3)--(6,4), black+linewidth(9));
draw((0,0)--(3,0)--(3,1)--(4,1)--(4,2)--(5,2)--(5,3)--(6,3)--(6,4), white+linewidth(6));
pen col;
for(int x =0; x<6; ++x) {
    for(int y = 0; y <=4; ++y) {
        if((x+y)%2 == 0) {
        	col = royalblue;
        }
        else {
        	col = orange;
        }
        draw((x,y)--(x+1,y), linewidth(3)+col);
    }
}
for(int x =0; x<=6; ++x) {
    for(int y = 0; y <4; ++y) {
        if((x+y)%2 == 0) {
        	col = royalblue;
        }
        else {
        	col = orange;
        }
        draw((x,y)--(x,y+1), linewidth(3)+col);
    }
}
for(int x =0; x<=6; ++x) {
    for(int y = 0; y <=4; ++y) {
        dot((x,y), black+5);
    }
}
[/asy]
But the only such path that is good is just the RR...RRUU...UU one, so this is the only possible base case in our induction! It is vacuously possible to tile the underside of this path with dominoes, since there is no underside at all.
This post has been edited 8 times. Last edited by ihatemath123, Yesterday at 5:22 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
vincentwant
1260 posts
#12
Y by
manifested combo j3

badged on the domino tiling proof for 2 hours until I saw the sol then took another 3/4 hour to see the final counting. id say this is 25 mohs

outline: We color the board in a checkerboard, and we prove that the two subsets are domino-tileable iff the number of tiles of the two colors in each subset is equal (we refer to such a subset as balanced). Consider one set, the bottom one. FTSOC let this set have the smallest possible size while still being balanced and non-domino-tileable. Then the only way this can be minimal is if it is a "staircase", as anything else (difference of 0 or 2) results in a domino being able to be placed horizontally or vertically to result in a smaller subset achievable by an up-right path. As it is non-domino-tileable the staircase has nonzero size, but all such staircases have an imbalance between tiles, contradiction.
For the final counting, let $S(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_{2m})$ denote the set $S_1$ on the bottom from the up-right path, where $a_k$ denotes the number of cells in $S_1$ in column $k$ (they are the bottommost $a_k$ cells). Then the only conditions on the sequence $a$ are that it is nonstrictly increasing, every term is an integer in $[0,2n]$, and there are the same number of odd numbers in even positions as odd numbers in odd positions (this is to account for the imbalance between colors in individual columns; they must cancel). Let $b_k=a_k+k$. Then the only conditions on $b$ are that it is strictly increasing, every term is an integer in $[1,2m+2n]$, and there are the same number of odd numbers in even positions as even numbers in odd positions, or equivalently, there are $m$ odd numbers and $m$ even numbers. There are $\binom{m+n}{m}^2$ ways to choose the sequence $b$, so that is our answer.

note on @#11: yes i did find that $(2,2)$ gives 36 in the first 20 minutes of solving which probably allowed me to get the formula .
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by vincentwant, Thursday at 1:56 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
andliu766
108 posts
#13
Y by
vincentwant wrote:
manifested combo j3

badged on the domino tiling proof for 2 hours until I saw the sol then took another 3/4 hour to see the final counting. id say this is 25 mohs

outline: We color the board in a checkerboard, and we prove that the two subsets are domino-tileable iff the number of tiles of the two colors in each subset is equal (we refer to such a subset as balanced). Consider one set, the bottom one. FTSOC let this set have the smallest possible size while still being balanced and non-domino-tileable. Then the only way this can be minimal is if it is a "staircase", as anything else (difference of 0 or 2) results in a domino being able to be placed horizontally or vertically to result in a smaller subset achievable by an up-right path. As it is non-domino-tileable the staircase has nonzero size, but all such staircases have an imbalance between tiles, contradiction.
For the final counting, let $S(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_{2m})$ denote the set $S_1$ on the bottom from the up-right path, where $a_k$ denotes the number of cells in $S_1$ in column $k$ (they are the bottommost $a_k$ cells). Then the only conditions on the sequence $a$ are that it is nonstrictly increasing, every term is an integer in $[0,2n]$, and there are the same number of odd numbers in even positions as odd numbers in odd positions (this is to account for the imbalance between colors in individual columns; they must cancel). Let $b_k=a_k+k$. Then the only conditions on $b$ are that it is strictly increasing, every term is an integer in $[1,2m+2n]$, and there are the same number of odd numbers in even positions as even numbers in odd positions, or equivalently, there are $m$ odd numbers and $m$ even numbers. There are $\binom{m+n}{m}^2$ ways to choose the sequence $b$, so that is our answer.

note on @#11: yes i did find that $(2,2)$ gives 36 in the first 20 minutes of solving which probably allowed me to get the formula .
admitting detected

is it ok if i say that being balanced implies tilable is well known?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
a_smart_alecks
52 posts
#14 • 1 Y
Y by mathfan2020
idea: show that if we express the up-right path as a sequence of Us and Rs, then there must be m Us in odd indices of the path and m Us in even indices of the path.

proof: first, rephrase the domino tiling condition as a condition on parities of the number of tiles under the path in each row of the grid. then do local argument showing that UU...UURRR...RRR works, and swapping a_i and a_{i+2} of the sequence works, so these swaps induce 2 distinct permutations each with (n+m choose m) possibilities so you do the square. formalizing this argument took a hella long time but after looking at the other sols, it seems like everybody's argument used somewhat strange conditions that weren't immediately obvious to prove
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by a_smart_alecks, Yesterday at 2:43 AM
Reason: xooklear xrbo
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
aliz
155 posts
#15
Y by
how are you guys so good at writeups this took me 6 pages of yap that has a nonzero chance of being docked to a 0+
also this solution is much more motivated by the answer of $\binom{m+n}{n}^2$ because you basically have to partition it into two equal groups
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by aliz, 2 hours ago
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Aarush12
74 posts
#16 • 1 Y
Y by aliz
aliz wrote:
how are you guys so good at writeups this took me 6 pages of yap lol

Excellent question, aliz! When writing proofs for mathematical olympiads such as USAMO and USAJMO, it is of high importance to make sure that your proofs are direct and to the point! There's no need to say, "We are motivated to try ____ due to ____, and thus ____. We now know that this is the right track, as ____." Simply say, "Thus, ____." I have an inherent tendency to do the former, infused into my blood through generations of LA teachers.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MathLuis
1457 posts
#18
Y by
Tough days to be a junior olympist in the US.
First make the classic chessboard coloring on the grid, we now claim that all paths that work are the ones that make sure that in both subsets of the grid there is the same amount of black and white squares.
Focus on the part with the least number of squares and wlog let it be the one closest to the right then if it was non-empty, cleaely if its tileable then it satiafies the condition and now say it does satisfy the condition, then start "removing" dominoes by shifting the lines propeerly until its empty, this can always be done until you end up with a "staircase" but by trivial counting this case leads to the set not satisfying the condition and thus the initial one didn't either.
To count these say row $k$ (going from $1$ to $2n$) on an arbitrary working division on the smallest section of $\mathcal R$ we have $r_k$ squares then what we know from this sequence is that all values lie between $[0,2m]$ and its non-decreasing and that the number of odd values on sequence in odd labeled rows is the same as the number of odd values on even labeled rows in order to balance the condition.
So now we want to correlate both $m,n$ and this will be done by simply considering $r_k+k$ instead and the condition is that this is strictly increasing, ranges in $[1, 2m+2n]$, and the number of evens in odd labels is equal to the number of odds in even labels, but by checking that odds and evens make a whole we can in fact from here see that there has to be $n$ evens and $n$ odds and by isolating the sequences by parity we can in fact conclude that this can be done in $\binom{m+n}{n}^2$ ways thus we are done :cool:.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Davdav1232
29 posts
#19 • 1 Y
Y by ihatemath123
ihatemath123 wrote:

.

I don't agree, I solved without checking $(2, 2)$, and the only way I used the answer for $(1, k)$ was to check my final answer.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Martin2001
130 posts
#20
Y by
If you only showed that iff below the path there is an equal number of black and white squares then it is tile able would that get any points?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
vincentwant
1260 posts
#21
Y by
That probably gets 2 points
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
llddmmtt1
385 posts
#22
Y by
i found quite quickly by counting the number of balanced thingies is sum for 0<=i<=m of (m choose i)^2(m+n+i choose 2m), and only realized this is equal to (m+n choose m)^2 after doing m=n=3 and getting 400 yes i didnt realize after m=n=2 im stupid
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a