We have your learning goals covered with Spring and Summer courses available. Enroll today!

Contests & Programs AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
3 M G
BBookmark  VNew Topic kLocked
Contests & Programs AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
3 M G
BBookmark  VNew Topic kLocked
G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
a My Retirement & New Leadership at AoPS
rrusczyk   1345
N 10 minutes ago by GoodGamer123
I write today to announce my retirement as CEO from Art of Problem Solving. When I founded AoPS 22 years ago, I never imagined that we would reach so many students and families, or that we would find so many channels through which we discover, inspire, and train the great problem solvers of the next generation. I am very proud of all we have accomplished and I’m thankful for the many supporters who provided inspiration and encouragement along the way. I'm particularly grateful to all of the wonderful members of the AoPS Community!

I’m delighted to introduce our new leaders - Ben Kornell and Andrew Sutherland. Ben has extensive experience in education and edtech prior to joining AoPS as my successor as CEO, including starting like I did as a classroom teacher. He has a deep understanding of the value of our work because he’s an AoPS parent! Meanwhile, Andrew and I have common roots as founders of education companies; he launched Quizlet at age 15! His journey from founder to MIT to technology and product leader as our Chief Product Officer traces a pathway many of our students will follow in the years to come.

Thank you again for your support for Art of Problem Solving and we look forward to working with millions more wonderful problem solvers in the years to come.

And special thanks to all of the amazing AoPS team members who have helped build AoPS. We’ve come a long way from here:IMAGE
1345 replies
+2 w
rrusczyk
Monday at 6:37 PM
GoodGamer123
10 minutes ago
k a March Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Mar 2, 2025
March is the month for State MATHCOUNTS competitions! Kudos to everyone who participated in their local chapter competitions and best of luck to all going to State! Join us on March 11th for a Math Jam devoted to our favorite Chapter competition problems! Are you interested in training for MATHCOUNTS? Be sure to check out our AMC 8/MATHCOUNTS Basics and Advanced courses.

Are you ready to level up with Olympiad training? Registration is open with early bird pricing available for our WOOT programs: MathWOOT (Levels 1 and 2), CodeWOOT, PhysicsWOOT, and ChemWOOT. What is WOOT? WOOT stands for Worldwide Online Olympiad Training and is a 7-month high school math Olympiad preparation and testing program that brings together many of the best students from around the world to learn Olympiad problem solving skills. Classes begin in September!

Do you have plans this summer? There are so many options to fit your schedule and goals whether attending a summer camp or taking online classes, it can be a great break from the routine of the school year. Check out our summer courses at AoPS Online, or if you want a math or language arts class that doesn’t have homework, but is an enriching summer experience, our AoPS Virtual Campus summer camps may be just the ticket! We are expanding our locations for our AoPS Academies across the country with 15 locations so far and new campuses opening in Saratoga CA, Johns Creek GA, and the Upper West Side NY. Check out this page for summer camp information.

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]March 5th (Wednesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, HCSSiM Math Jam 2025. Amber Verser, Assistant Director of the Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics, will host an information session about HCSSiM, a summer program for high school students.
[*]March 6th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar on Math Competitions from elementary through high school. Join us for an enlightening session that demystifies the world of math competitions and helps you make informed decisions about your contest journey.
[*]March 11th (Tuesday), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS Chapter Discussion MATH JAM. AoPS instructors will discuss some of their favorite problems from the MATHCOUNTS Chapter Competition. All are welcome!
[*]March 13th (Thursday), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Free Webinar about Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus. Transform your summer into an unforgettable learning adventure! From elementary through high school, we offer dynamic summer camps featuring topics in mathematics, language arts, and competition preparation - all designed to fit your schedule and ignite your passion for learning.[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Friday, Mar 28 - Jul 18
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Jul 8
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21


Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jul 20
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 16 - Jun 8
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Monday, Mar 17 - Jun 9
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Sunday, Mar 2 - Jun 22
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Tuesday, Mar 4 - Aug 12
Sunday, Mar 23 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Mar 16 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Sunday, Mar 23 - Aug 3
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Sunday, Mar 16 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Wednesday, Mar 5 - May 21
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Sunday, Mar 30 - Oct 5
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Sunday, Mar 23 - Jun 15
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Tuesday, Mar 4 - May 20
Monday, Mar 31 - Jun 23
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Monday, Mar 24 - Jun 16
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Sunday, Mar 30 - Jun 22
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Tuesday, Mar 25 - Sep 2
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Mar 2, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
What should I do
Jaxman8   0
8 minutes ago
I recently mocked 2 AMC 10’s, and 2 AIME’s. My scores for the AMC 10 were both 123 and my AIME scores were 8 and 9 for 2010 I and II. What should I study for 2025-2026 AMCs? Goal is JMO.
0 replies
Jaxman8
8 minutes ago
0 replies
Practice AMC 10 Final Fives
freddyfazbear   0
36 minutes ago
So someone pointed out to me that the last five problems on my previous practice AMC 10 test were rather low quality. Here are some problems that are (hopefully) better.

21.
A partition of a positive integer n is writing n as the sum of positive integer(s), where order does not matter. Find the number of partitions of 6.
A - 10, B - 11, C - 12, D - 13, E - 14

22.
Let n be the smallest positive integer that satisfies the following conditions:
- n is even
- The last digit of n is not 2 or 8
- n^2 + 1 is composite
Find the sum of the digits of n.
A - 3, B - 5, C - 8, D - 9, E - 10

23.
Find the sum of the coordinates of the reflection of the point (6, 9) over the line x + 2y + 3 = 0.
A - (-17.7), B - (-17.6), C - (-17.5), D - (-17.4), E - (-17.3)

24.
Find the number of ordered pairs of integers (a, b), where both a and b have absolute value less than 69, such that a^2 + 42b^2 = 13ab.
A - 21, B - 40, C - 41, D - 42, E - 69

25.
Let f(n) be the sum of the positive integer factors of n, where n is an integer. Find the sum of all positive integers n less than 1000 such that f(f(n) - n) = f(n).
A - 420, B - 530, C - 690, D - 911, E - 1034
0 replies
freddyfazbear
36 minutes ago
0 replies
usamOOK geometry
KevinYang2.71   86
N 38 minutes ago by deduck
Source: USAMO 2025/4, USAJMO 2025/5
Let $H$ be the orthocenter of acute triangle $ABC$, let $F$ be the foot of the altitude from $C$ to $AB$, and let $P$ be the reflection of $H$ across $BC$. Suppose that the circumcircle of triangle $AFP$ intersects line $BC$ at two distinct points $X$ and $Y$. Prove that $C$ is the midpoint of $XY$.
86 replies
KevinYang2.71
Mar 21, 2025
deduck
38 minutes ago
Scary Binomial Coefficient Sum
EpicBird08   38
N 44 minutes ago by Mathandski
Source: USAMO 2025/5
Determine, with proof, all positive integers $k$ such that $$\frac{1}{n+1} \sum_{i=0}^n \binom{n}{i}^k$$is an integer for every positive integer $n.$
38 replies
1 viewing
EpicBird08
Mar 21, 2025
Mathandski
44 minutes ago
equal angles
jhz   2
N 2 hours ago by YaoAOPS
Source: 2025 CTST P16
In convex quadrilateral $ABCD, AB \perp AD, AD = DC$. Let $ E$ be a point on side $BC$, and $F$ be a point on the extension of $DE$ such that $\angle ABF = \angle DEC>90^{\circ}$. Let $O$ be the circumcenter of $\triangle CDE$, and $P$ be a point on the side extension of $FO$ satisfying $FB =FP$. Line BP intersects AC at point Q. Prove that $\angle AQB =\angle DPF.$
2 replies
jhz
4 hours ago
YaoAOPS
2 hours ago
Flee Jumping on Number Line
utkarshgupta   23
N 2 hours ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: All Russian Olympiad 2015 11.5
An immortal flea jumps on whole points of the number line, beginning with $0$. The length of the first jump is $3$, the second $5$, the third $9$, and so on. The length of $k^{\text{th}}$ jump is equal to $2^k + 1$. The flea decides whether to jump left or right on its own. Is it possible that sooner or later the flee will have been on every natural point, perhaps having visited some of the points more than once?
23 replies
utkarshgupta
Dec 11, 2015
Ilikeminecraft
2 hours ago
Smallest value of |253^m - 40^n|
MS_Kekas   3
N 2 hours ago by imagien_bad
Source: Kyiv City MO 2024 Round 1, Problem 9.5
Find the smallest value of the expression $|253^m - 40^n|$ over all pairs of positive integers $(m, n)$.

Proposed by Oleksii Masalitin
3 replies
MS_Kekas
Jan 28, 2024
imagien_bad
2 hours ago
Operating on lamps in a circle
anantmudgal09   7
N 2 hours ago by hectorleo123
Source: India Practice TST 2017 D2 P3
There are $n$ lamps $L_1, L_2, \dots, L_n$ arranged in a circle in that order. At any given time, each lamp is either on or off. Every second, each lamp undergoes a change according to the following rule:

(a) For each lamp $L_i$, if $L_{i-1}, L_i, L_{i+1}$ have the same state in the previous second, then $L_i$ is off right now. (Indices taken mod $n$.)

(b) Otherwise, $L_i$ is on right now.

Initially, all the lamps are off, except for $L_1$ which is on. Prove that for infinitely many integers $n$ all the lamps will be off eventually, after a finite amount of time.
7 replies
anantmudgal09
Dec 9, 2017
hectorleo123
2 hours ago
2025 Caucasus MO Seniors P1
BR1F1SZ   3
N 2 hours ago by Mathdreams
Source: Caucasus MO
For given positive integers $a$ and $b$, let us consider the equation$$a + \gcd(b, x) = b + \gcd(a, x).$$[list=a]
[*]For $a = 20$ and $b = 25$, find the least positive integer $x$ satisfying this equation.
[*]Prove that for any positive integers $a$ and $b$, there exist infinitely many positive integers $x$ satisfying this equation.
[/list]
(Here, $\gcd(m, n)$ denotes the greatest common divisor of positive integers $m$ and $n$.)
3 replies
BR1F1SZ
5 hours ago
Mathdreams
2 hours ago
IMO 2018 Problem 2
juckter   95
N 2 hours ago by Marcus_Zhang
Find all integers $n \geq 3$ for which there exist real numbers $a_1, a_2, \dots a_{n + 2}$ satisfying $a_{n + 1} = a_1$, $a_{n + 2} = a_2$ and
$$a_ia_{i + 1} + 1 = a_{i + 2},$$for $i = 1, 2, \dots, n$.

Proposed by Patrik Bak, Slovakia
95 replies
1 viewing
juckter
Jul 9, 2018
Marcus_Zhang
2 hours ago
Long condition for the beginning
wassupevery1   2
N 2 hours ago by wassupevery1
Source: 2025 Vietnam IMO TST - Problem 1
Find all functions $f: \mathbb{Q}^+ \to \mathbb{Q}^+$ such that $$\dfrac{f(x)f(y)}{f(xy)} = \dfrac{\left( \sqrt{f(x)} + \sqrt{f(y)} \right)^2}{f(x+y)}$$holds for all positive rational numbers $x, y$.
2 replies
wassupevery1
Yesterday at 1:49 PM
wassupevery1
2 hours ago
Inspired by IMO 1984
sqing   0
2 hours ago
Source: Own
Let $ a,b,c\geq 0 $ and $a+b+c=1$. Prove that
$$a^2+b^2+ ab +24abc\leq\frac{81}{64}$$Equality holds when $a=b=\frac{3}{8},c=\frac{1}{4}.$
$$a^2+b^2+ ab +18abc\leq\frac{343}{324}$$Equality holds when $a=b=\frac{7}{18},c=\frac{2}{9}.$
0 replies
sqing
2 hours ago
0 replies
Prime-related integers [CMO 2018 - P3]
Amir Hossein   15
N 3 hours ago by Ilikeminecraft
Source: 2018 Canadian Mathematical Olympiad - P3
Two positive integers $a$ and $b$ are prime-related if $a = pb$ or $b = pa$ for some prime $p$. Find all positive integers $n$, such that $n$ has at least three divisors, and all the divisors can be arranged without repetition in a circle so that any two adjacent divisors are prime-related.

Note that $1$ and $n$ are included as divisors.
15 replies
Amir Hossein
Mar 31, 2018
Ilikeminecraft
3 hours ago
Inspired by IMO 1984
sqing   2
N 3 hours ago by sqing
Source: Own
Let $ a,b,c\geq 0 $ and $a+b+c=1$. Prove that
$$a^2+b^2+ ab +17abc\leq\frac{8000}{7803}$$$$a^2+b^2+ ab +\frac{163}{10}abc\leq\frac{7189057}{7173630}$$$$a^2+b^2+ ab +16.23442238abc\le1$$
2 replies
sqing
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
sqing
3 hours ago
Distributing cupcakes
KevinYang2.71   19
N Mar 24, 2025 by sixoneeight
Source: USAMO 2025/6
Let $m$ and $n$ be positive integers with $m\geq n$. There are $m$ cupcakes of different flavors arranged around a circle and $n$ people who like cupcakes. Each person assigns a nonnegative real number score to each cupcake, depending on how much they like the cupcake. Suppose that for each person $P$, it is possible to partition the circle of $m$ cupcakes into $n$ groups of consecutive cupcakes so that the sum of $P$'s scores of the cupcakes in each group is at least $1$. Prove that it is possible to distribute the $m$ cupcakes to the $n$ people so that each person $P$ receives cupcakes of total score at least $1$ with respect to $P$.
19 replies
KevinYang2.71
Mar 21, 2025
sixoneeight
Mar 24, 2025
Distributing cupcakes
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: USAMO 2025/6
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
KevinYang2.71
409 posts
#1 • 5 Y
Y by ihatemath123, lpieleanu, RoyalPrince, LostDreams, Countmath1
Let $m$ and $n$ be positive integers with $m\geq n$. There are $m$ cupcakes of different flavors arranged around a circle and $n$ people who like cupcakes. Each person assigns a nonnegative real number score to each cupcake, depending on how much they like the cupcake. Suppose that for each person $P$, it is possible to partition the circle of $m$ cupcakes into $n$ groups of consecutive cupcakes so that the sum of $P$'s scores of the cupcakes in each group is at least $1$. Prove that it is possible to distribute the $m$ cupcakes to the $n$ people so that each person $P$ receives cupcakes of total score at least $1$ with respect to $P$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Countmath1
176 posts
#2 • 41 Y
Y by arfekete, Equinox8, balllightning37, Pengu14, EpicBird08, Ilikeminecraft, Awesomeness_in_a_bun, OronSH, KevinYang2.71, ihatemath123, lpieleanu, Amkan2022, BS2012, GrantStar, aidan0626, ninjaforce, tediousbear, the_math_prodigy, megarnie, mathfan2020, Sedro, LostDreams, GeronimoStilton, github, Marcus_Zhang, Toinfinity, elasticwealth, centslordm, DreamineYT, MathRook7817, Exponent11, williamxiao, eg4334, CyclicISLscelesTrapezoid, sdfgfjh, Geometry285, xHypotenuse, watery, eduD_looC, AlexWin0806, Jack_w
how many partials for throwing up 2 mins into the test then leaving
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
YaoAOPS
1500 posts
#3 • 3 Y
Y by peace09, KevinYang2.71, centslordm
Communicated to me by the orz orz orz jatloe.

Define the $P$ person's partitions as bubbles. Then we get a matching between the $n$ people $P$ and the first person's $n$ bubbles $B$. Connect a person to a bubble if they value that bubble as more than $1$, so one person is connected to all the bubbles on this bipartite graph $G \subset P \times B$. If Hall's condition is satisfied on these people, take that matching to win. Else, there exists some set $X$ of people such that they match less than $|X|$ bubbles. Remove that set, and repeatedly remove any set with $|N_G(X)| < |X|$. We must end up with some non-empty set of people $M$ such that $M$ and $N_G(M)$ have a matching, and no person in $P \setminus M$ matches any bubble in $N_G(M)$. In this case, we may take a matching on $M$ and $N_G(M)$, and remove this matching and the corresponding bubbles; since the remaining people aren't connected to these bubbles, this inductively preserves the score condition for them.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by YaoAOPS, Mar 21, 2025, 1:13 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8857 posts
#4 • 3 Y
Y by krithikrokcs, bjump, centslordm
This problem is ultra cool. Here is a solution communicated to me by (the goat himself) Lerchen Zhong. We perform a strong induction on $n$.

We call a continuous arc of cupcakes $\mathcal A$ delicious for person $P_i$ if the sum of $P_i$'s scores across the cupcakes in that arc is at least $1$. Consider a partition of the circle $\mathcal C$ into disjoint counterclockwise-oriented arcs $\mathcal A_1, \mathcal A_2, \dots, \mathcal A_n$ such that
  • $\mathcal A_1$ is the shortest arc starting at some cupcake $C$ that is delicious for someone;
  • for each $i$, $\mathcal A_i$ is the shortest arc starting at the first cupcake counterclockwise of $\mathcal A_{i-1}$ that is delicious for someone.
By the given condition, we can always perform such a partition. Fix these arcs $\mathcal A_1, \dots, \mathcal A_n$ now. For each arc $\mathcal A_i$, define the set $S_i$ to consist of all the people for which $\mathcal A_i$ is delicious. Then $S_i$ is nonempty for every $i$. In fact, this is all the information we need to solve the problem.

We call a complete family $\mathcal F$ of the sets $S_i$ a family of subsets such that there exists a positive integer $k$ with
  • the union $\left|\bigcup_{S_i \in \mathcal F} S_i\right| = k$;
  • a perfect matching from $P_1, \dots, P_k$ (indexed without loss of generality) to the sets in $\mathcal F$ (under the obvious condition).
If there exists a complete family $\mathcal F$, we can simply distribute the cupcakes in $S_i$ according to the matching and induct down. Otherwise, assume for the sake of contradiction that the result is not true; then there is no perfect matching between the $S_i$ and $P_i$, so by the converse of Hall's marriage lemma, Hall's condition should fail.

Thus, take a minimal $k \geq 2$ such that $|S_1 \cup \cdots \cup S_k| < k$. But then Hall's condition holds for $k-1$, i.e. we can take that perfect matching (which notably contains only $k-1$ elements in the union) and induct down. This completes the proof.

Remark: [Rambling] I think Hall's marriage lemma is a natural idea to apply here: you have some sort of condition that says that there are ``enough" cupcakes for each person individually, so there should be a perfect matching. I found the difficulty of the problem to be the splitting into arcs $\mathcal A_i$ then realizing that this is sufficient to solve the problem. While the later Hall arguments are nontrivial, they are also quite unexpected (you want some kind of perfect matching and also a tight union set to induct, and those just sort of come together!), and while I did write down the $\mathcal A_i$ partition, I didn't think much of it. So in a sense this problem has a similar pitfall as USAMO2: you have to be confident that once you do have the $S_i$ reformulation that this information is sufficient to solve the problem.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by HamstPan38825, Mar 21, 2025, 1:24 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
plang2008
329 posts
#5
Y by
YaoAOPS wrote:
Communicated to me by the orz orz orz jatloe.

Define the $P$ person's partitions as bubbles. Then we get a matching between the $n$ people $P$ and the first person's $n$ bubbles $B$. Connect a person to a bubble if they value that bubble as more than $1$, so one person is connected to all the bubbles on this bipartite graph $G \subset P \times B$. If Hall's condition is satisfied on these people, take that matching to win. Else, there exists some set $X$ of people such that they match less than $|X|$ bubbles. Remove that set, and repeatedly remove any set with $|N_G(X)| < |X|$. We must end up with some non-empty set of people $M$ such that $M$ and $N_G(M)$ have a matching, and no person in $P \setminus M$ matches any bubble in $N_G(M)$. In this case, we may take a matching on $M$ and $N_G(M)$, and remove this matching and the corresponding bubbles; since the remaining people aren't connected to these bubbles, this inductively preserves the score condition for them.

How many points for getting up to the Hall’s graph, but with flawed, kinda flipped sign of hall’s: I said if there exists $|N_G(X)| > |X|$ we can remove them and induct down (which is false) otherwise (this case doesn’t even exist??) there exists a bubble not matched with anyone which we can induct down on preserving score. I missed the immediate match and win case and I think my second case is a subset of my first which is skullers. Like I’m pretty sure I have a solve if in my first case instead of matching and winning I match and consider the complement which eventually reduces to something like my second case.

This is what happens when you figure out how p6 works with 20 minutes left, not having any time to recall Hall’s correctly or write down detailed proof, since you misread p5 and made it harder than it asked for
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by plang2008, Mar 21, 2025, 3:01 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
USJL
530 posts
#6 • 6 Y
Y by ihatemath123, NaturalSelection, aidan0626, Exponent11, i3435, MathRook7817
This is proposed by me and Cheng-Ying Chang. Probably the whackiest hall's I've ever done.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by USJL, Yesterday at 12:56 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mathandski
726 posts
#7 • 10 Y
Y by peace09, YaoAOPS, aidan0626, megarnie, Sedro, KevinYang2.71, EpicBird08, balllightning37, LostDreams, sixoneeight
In all seriousness though I was planning on reviewing hall but forgot so it is 100% my own fault I missed this. Posting this just because it aged humorously
Attachments:
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Mathandski, Mar 21, 2025, 3:47 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
plang2008
329 posts
#8
Y by
Mathandski wrote:
In all seriousness though I was planning on reviewing hall but forgot so it is 100% my own fault I missed this. Posting this just because it aged humorously

I learned Hall’s for the first time at Mathcamp but never did the provided hw so when the idea of Hall’s came to me on P6 I couldn’t formulate it fast enough because I just 1) have never applied it and 2) don’t have the condition ingrained in my head.

Maybe this is a sign to do your homework guys
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
KevinYang2.71
409 posts
#9
Y by
then theres me who read Diestel so i know Hall and Konig and Tutte and literally every matching theorem there exists
but i still couldnt solve this problem with 50 minutes left (i didnt try)
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by KevinYang2.71, Mar 21, 2025, 5:31 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ihatemath123
3440 posts
#10 • 3 Y
Y by peace09, Mintylemon66, centslordm
FWIW, the posts in #3 and #4 gloss over the exact deletion process, and even though the Hall's lemma is the actual hard part of the proof, it's not a complete solution unless you explain how the deletion works too. Unless I'm going crazy, it's not just a trivial thing you can say in one sentence?

(Btw, I didn't solve this problem either. The solution was communicated to me by Andrew Carratu, who heard it from Lerchen I think. Or maybe Apra?)
Call the $s$ people who you are about to delete settled. For the people who aren't settled, you need to make sure they lose exactly $s$ groups in the deletion, and that each of their remaining groups still has value at least 1. For each of the $s$ settled people, delete the group they match with one at a time. Call the group we are about to delete $G$. By the hypothesis (this is what the Hall's was for), the $n-s$ unsettled people value $G$ at most $1$. In particular, none of these unsettled people will possess a group that is contained strictly within $G$. They either own two adjacent groups whose border lies inside $G$, or they own one group that contains $G$ (or is equal to $G$).
  • Suppose an unsettled person falls under the former case. Before, the two adjacent groups had a total value of at least $2$, and after deleting $G$, at most $1$ total value of cupcake was deleted from the union of those groups. Gluing the remains of those two groups together thus creates a new group with total value at least $1$, maintaining the condition. In particular, gluing these groups together decreases this unsettled person's total number of groups by one, which is what we want.
  • Suppose an unsettled person falls under the latter case. So, by deleting $G$, we put a hole in this unsettled person's group. Then, they simply glue the two remains of this group together with another group to the left. The value of this new group is at least $1$ (in fact, equality holds only when there the remains of the group totaled $0$ in value).
We obviously don't need to worry about regrouping the settled people. So, repeating this process $s$ times on each of the settled people will leave us with only the $n-s$ unsettled people remaining, each of whom have $n-s$ groups.

Notably, the deletion process is the only part of the problem where you use (a) the fact that the value of a group is determined by the sum of its individual cupcake values, and not some other function of the values, and (b) the fact that the groups are contiguous. It's important to find a maximal set of settled people to delete at once, since we take advantage of the fact that we don't need to regroup the settled people.
This post has been edited 5 times. Last edited by ihatemath123, Mar 21, 2025, 7:41 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
plang2008
329 posts
#13 • 1 Y
Y by eg4334
Ok here’s an attempt. I’m still crashing out over how many wrong statements I wrote about hall’s yet have the right idea all along


Call each person's consecutive group of cupcakes their bubbles. WLOG each bubble has a total score of $1$ by scaling down; clearly we can scale back up later.

Consider a specific person $P$. Let $X$ be the set of the other $n - 1$ people and $Y$ be the set of bubbles of $P$. Match a person with a bubble if the bubble's score for that person is greater than $1$. We have a bipartite graph.

Now we consider a reduction step. Suppose we give $P$ a bubble $B$, then $P$ is happy. If no other person $Q$ matches with $B$, then $Q$ is happy too, and since $B$ does not fully contain any bubbles of $Q$, so we can join the up to two bubbles of $Q$ that was split by $B$, preserving the score condition. If someone matches with $B$, then we may run into issues.

Now apply Hall's. If Hall's condition is satisfied, then we can easily match all $n-1$ people with a bubble and give $P$ their last bubble. This reduces the problem to a smaller $n$. If Hall's condition is not satisfied, this means there is some subset $S$ such that if the set of its matches is $N(S)$, then $|S| > |N(S)|$.

Thus consider $X \setminus S$ and $Y \setminus N(S)$. Since $|X| < |Y|$, clearly $|X \setminus S| < |Y \setminus N(S)|$ still. Additionally, note that no person in $S$ matches with any bubble in $Y \setminus N(S)$. Thus, we return to our original hypothesis.

Thus we can continue reducing until Hall's condition is satisfied (in which case we match and reduce), or until $X \setminus S = \emptyset$. In this case, clearly $Y \setminus N(S) \neq \emptyset$, so there is indeed an empty bubble. Apply the reduction step mentioned earlier. This concludes the reduction.

And of course, $n = 1$ is trivial.
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by plang2008, Mar 21, 2025, 11:08 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
S.Das93
707 posts
#14 • 1 Y
Y by elasticwealth
plang2008 wrote:
Ok here’s an attempt. I’m still crashing out over how many wrong statements I wrote about hall’s yet have the right idea all along


Call each person's consuective group of cupcakes their bubbles. WLOG each bubble has a total score of $1$ by scaling down; clearly we can scale back up later.

Consider a specific person $P$. Let $X$ be the set of the other $n - 1$ people and $Y$ be the set of bubbles of $P$. Match a person with a bubble if the bubble's score for that person is greater than $1$. We have a bipartite graph.

Now we consider a reduction step. Suppose we give $P$ a bubble $B$, then $P$ is happy. If no other person $Q$ matches with $B$, then $Q$ is happy too, and since $B$ does not fully contain any bubbles of $Q$, so we can join the up to two bubbles of $Q$ that was split by $B$, preserving the score condition. If someone matches with $B$, then we may run into issues.

Now apply Hall's. If Hall's condition is satisfied, then we can easily match all $n-1$ people with a bubble and give $P$ their last bubble. If Hall's condition is not satifisfied, this means there is some subset $S$ such that if the set of its matches is $N(S)$, then $|S| > |N(S)|$.

Thus consider $X \setminus S$ and $Y \setminus N(S)$. Since $|X| < |Y|$, clearly $|X \setminus S| < |Y \setminus N(S)|$ still. Additionally, note that no person in $S$ matches with any bubble in $Y \setminus N(S)$. Thus, we return to our original hypothesis.

Thus we can continue reducing until Hall's condition is satisfied (in which case we match and win), or until $X \setminus S = \emptyset$. In this case, clearly $Y \setminus N(S) \neq \emptyset$, so there is indeed an empty bubble. Apply the reduction step mentioned earlier. This concludes the reduction.

And of course, $n = 1$ is trivial.


0/7, you spelled consecutive wrong
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
plang2008
329 posts
#15
Y by
S.Das93 wrote:

0/7, you spelled consecutive wrong

well i’m already 0/7 for writing hall’s condition wrong
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
S.Das93
707 posts
#16
Y by
hall's divorce
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
v_Enhance
6870 posts
#17 • 6 Y
Y by H_Taken, Exponent11, aidan0626, ihatemath123, EpicBird08, ostriches88
Amazing problem. Here's my write-up of it. When working on it myself, I had the idea to match one person's arcs with Hall but didn't see the deletion argument.

Arbitrarily pick any one person --- call her Pip --- and her $n$ arcs. The initial idea is to try to apply Hall's marriage lemma to match the $n$ people with Pip's arcs (such that each such person is happy with their matched arc). To that end, construct the obvious bipartite graph $\mathfrak{G}$ between the people and the arcs for Pip.
We now consider the following algorithm, which takes several steps.
  • If a perfect matching of $\mathfrak{G}$ exists, we're done!
  • We're probably not that lucky. Per Hall's condition, this means there is a bad set $\mathcal{B}_1$ of people, who are compatible with fewer than $|\mathcal{B}_1|$ of the arcs. Let's imagine deleting $\mathcal{B}_1$ and those neighbors of $\mathcal{B}_1$, then try to find a matching on the remaining graph.
  • If a matching exists, terminate the algorithm. Otherwise, that means there's another bad set $\mathcal{B}_2$ for the remaining graph. We again delete $\mathcal{B}_2$ and the fewer than $\mathcal{B}_2$ neighbors.
  • Repeat until some perfect matching $\mathfrak{M}$ is possible in the remaining graph, i.e.\ there are no more bad sets (and then terminate once that occurs).
    Since Pip is a universal vertex, it's impossible to delete Pip, so the algorithm does indeed terminate with nonempty $\mathcal{M}$.
A cartoon of this picture is shown below.
[asy]usepackage("amssymb");
size(8cm); dotfactor *= 1.3; real w = 3; real eps = 0.4; label("People", (-w,10)); label("Arcs of Pip", (w,10)); filldraw(box((-w-eps, 9+eps), (-w+eps,7-eps)), invisible, red+1.2); filldraw(box((-w-eps, 6+eps), (-w+eps,5-eps)), invisible, orange+1.2); filldraw(box((-w-eps, 4+eps), (-w+eps,2-eps)), invisible, brown+1.2);
filldraw(box((w-eps, 9+eps), (w+eps,8-eps)), invisible, red+1.2); filldraw(box((w-eps, 7+eps), (w+eps,7-eps)), invisible, orange+1.2); filldraw(box((w-eps, 6+eps), (w+eps,5-eps)), invisible, brown+1.2);
draw((-w+eps, 9+eps)--(w-eps, 9+eps), red+dashed); draw((-w+eps, 7-eps)--(w-eps, 8-eps), red+dashed); draw((-w+eps, 6+eps)--(w-eps, 9+eps), orange+dashed); draw((-w+eps, 5-eps)--(w-eps, 7-eps), orange+dashed); draw((-w+eps, 4+eps)--(w-eps, 9+eps), brown+dashed); draw((-w+eps, 2-eps)--(w-eps, 5-eps), brown+dashed);
label((-w-eps, 8), "Bad set $\mathcal{B}_1$", dir(180), black); label((-w-eps, 5.5), "Bad set $\mathcal{B}_2$", dir(180), black); label((-w-eps, 3), "Bad set $\mathcal{B}_3$", dir(180), black);
draw((-w,1)--(w,1), deepgreen+1.3); draw((-w,0)--(w,0), deepgreen+1.3); label((0, 0.5), "Final perfect matching $\mathfrak{M}$", deepgreen);
for (int i=0; i<10; ++i) { dot((w,i), blue); dot((-w,i), blue); } label("Pip", (-w,0), dir(180), blue);
[/asy]
We commit to assigning each of person in $\mathcal{M}$ their matched arc (in particular if there are no bad sets at all, the problem is already solved). Now we finish the problem by induction on $n$ (for the remaining people) by simply deleting the arcs used up by $\mathcal{M}$.
To see why this deletion-induction works, consider any particular person $Q$ not in $\mathcal{M}$. By definition, $Q$ is not happy with any of the arcs in $\mathcal{M}$ So when an arc $\mathcal{A}$ of $\mathfrak{M}$ is deleted, it had value less than $1$ for $Q$, so in particular it couldn't contain entirely any of $Q$'s arcs. Hence at most one endpoint among $Q$'s arcs was in the deleted arc $\mathcal{A}$. If so, this causes two arcs of $Q$ to merge, and the merged value is \[ (\ge 1) + (\ge 1) - (\le 1) \qquad \ge \qquad 1 \]meaning the induction is OK. See below for a cartoon of the deletion, where Pip's arcs are drawn in blue while $Q$'s arcs and scores are drawn in red (in this example $n=3$).
[asy]
size(13cm); usepackage("amsmath"); pair O = (0,0); picture before; picture after;
real r = 1; real s = 0.9; real t = 0.65;
draw(before, arc(O, s, -20, 80), red+1.3); draw(before, arc(O, s, 100, 200), red+1.3); draw(before, arc(O, s, 220, 320), red+1.3);
draw(before, "Pip arc to delete", arc(O, r,  40, 140), blue+1.3); draw(before, rotate(-60)*"Pip arc", arc(O, r, 160, 260), blue+1.3); draw(before, rotate( 60)*"Pip arc", arc(O, r, 280, 380), blue+1.3);
label(before, "$\boxed{0.2}$", t*dir(120), red); label(before, "$\boxed{0.3}$", t*dir( 60), red); label(before, "$\boxed{0.8}$", t*dir(180), red); label(before, "$\boxed{0.43}$", t*dir(240), red); label(before, "$\boxed{0.57}$", t*dir(300), red); label(before, "$\boxed{0.7}$", t*dir(  0), red); label(before, "$Q$'s values", O, red);
draw(after, arc(O, s, -20, 200), red+1.3); draw(after, arc(O, s, 220, 320), red+1.3);
draw(after, rotate(-60)*"Pip arc", arc(O, r, 160, 260), blue+1.3); draw(after, rotate( 60)*"Pip arc", arc(O, r, 280, 380), blue+1.3);
label(after, "$\boxed{0.8}$", t*dir(180), red); label(after, "$\boxed{0.43}$", t*dir(240), red); label(after, "$\boxed{0.57}$", t*dir(300), red); label(after, "$\boxed{0.7}$", t*dir(  0), red); label(after, "$Q$'s values", O, red);
add(before); add(shift(3.2,0)*after);
[/asy]

Remark: This deletion argument can be thought of in some special cases even before the realization of Hall, in the case where $\mathcal{M}$ has only one person (Pip). This amounts to saying that if one of Pip's arcs isn't liked by anybody, then that arc can be deleted and the induction carries through.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by v_Enhance, Mar 23, 2025, 12:27 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ihatemath123
3440 posts
#19 • 1 Y
Y by v_Enhance
@above in the deletion process, isn't it also possible for $Q$ to contain the deleted arc entirely? (so zero of the endpoints are in the deleted arc)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
plang2008
329 posts
#20
Y by
ihatemath123 wrote:
@above in the deletion process, isn't it also possible for $Q$ to contain the deleted arc entirely? (so zero of the endpoints are in the deleted arc)

then you can just arbitrarily join that arc of $Q$ with a neighboring one (which is valid since $1 + (\geq0) \geq 1$)
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
deduck
178 posts
#21
Y by
is this possible to do without halls because i wasted 30 mins and have no idea what is going on
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
MathLuis
1466 posts
#22 • 1 Y
Y by KevinYang2.71
Pick the $n$ partitions of an arbitrary person and we will try to match them with the $n$ people so that all of them are happy on their arc. Clearly this isn't always possible, so we make our abritrary person pick so that when making the search for the maximal matching we get the biggest out of all possible outcomes (by fixing the $n$ arcs of a different person).
Now if a complete matching was not possible at all by Hall's this means that there does exist a set of people $X$ that can be happy in less than $|X|$ arcs as a group, so what we wil do is just to delete $X$ and its neighbourhood as well. So now we just repeat this until we find a perfect matching, clearly the process terminates at some non-degenerate point because the intial person cannot be deleted as it is always happily matched.
Consider this final matching graph to be $\mathcal H$ then we will now perform induction on $n$ for the remaining people lying outside $\mathcal H$, it is clear that if we pick a random person outside $\mathcal H$ it is because it was not happy with any of the arcs on $\mathcal H$ and thus with respect of that person, each of thise arcs has value less than $1$ so clearly no arc that made this person happy was in $\mathcal H$ however this means by instead now removing the whole matching $\mathcal H$ we can induct down on the next set of people as we have seen these are completely disjoint and inductivity will preserve the happyness condition by merging (basically observe that $(>1)+(>1)-(<1) \ge (>1)$ can be considered), thus we are done :cool:.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sixoneeight
1134 posts
#23
Y by
Mathandski wrote:
In all seriousness though I was planning on reviewing hall but forgot so it is 100% my own fault I missed this. Posting this just because it aged humorously

That's my bad guys (the guy who said no is me)
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by sixoneeight, Mar 24, 2025, 12:49 AM
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a