Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

Contests & Programs AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
3 M G
BBookmark  VNew Topic kLocked
Contests & Programs AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
AMC and other contests, summer programs, etc.
3 M G
BBookmark  VNew Topic kLocked
G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a May Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
May 1, 2025
May is an exciting month! National MATHCOUNTS is the second week of May in Washington D.C. and our Founder, Richard Rusczyk will be presenting a seminar, Preparing Strong Math Students for College and Careers, on May 11th.

Are you interested in working towards MATHCOUNTS and don’t know where to start? We have you covered! If you have taken Prealgebra, then you are ready for MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics. Already aiming for State or National MATHCOUNTS and harder AMC 8 problems? Then our MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced course is for you.

Summer camps are starting next month at the Virtual Campus in math and language arts that are 2 - to 4 - weeks in duration. Spaces are still available - don’t miss your chance to have an enriching summer experience. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following upcoming events:
[list][*]May 9th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, Casework 2: Overwhelming Evidence — A Text Adventure, a game where participants will work together to navigate the map, solve puzzles, and win! All are welcome.
[*]May 19th, 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, What's Next After Beast Academy?, designed for students finishing Beast Academy and ready for Prealgebra 1.
[*]May 20th, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 1 Math Jam, Problems 1 to 4, join the Canada/USA Mathcamp staff for this exciting Math Jam, where they discuss solutions to Problems 1 to 4 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz!
[*]May 21st, 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Mathcamp 2025 Qualifying Quiz Part 2 Math Jam, Problems 5 and 6, Canada/USA Mathcamp staff will discuss solutions to Problems 5 and 6 of the 2025 Mathcamp Qualifying Quiz![/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Paradoxes and Infinity
Mon, Tue, Wed, & Thurs, Jul 14 - Jul 16 (meets every day of the week!)

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

AIME Problem Series A
Thursday, May 22 - Jul 31

AIME Problem Series B
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
May 1, 2025
0 replies
Jane street swag package? USA(J)MO
arfekete   14
N 5 minutes ago by Soupboy0
Hey! People are starting to get their swag packages from Jane Street for qualifying for USA(J)MO, and after some initial discussion on what we got, people are getting different things. Out of curiosity, I was wondering how they decide who gets what.
Please enter the following info:

- USAMO or USAJMO
- Grade
- Score
- Award/Medal/HM
- MOP (yes or no, if yes then color)
- List of items you got in your package

I will reply with my info as an example.
14 replies
+1 w
arfekete
Yesterday at 4:34 PM
Soupboy0
5 minutes ago
HCSSiM results
SurvivingInEnglish   62
N an hour ago by cowstalker
Anyone already got results for HCSSiM? Are there any point in sending additional work if I applied on March 19?
62 replies
SurvivingInEnglish
Apr 5, 2024
cowstalker
an hour ago
Will I fail again
hashbrown2009   3
N 2 hours ago by mhgelgi
so this year I got 34 on JMO 772 774 and got docked 1 point from top honors + mop

I just got info that I pretty much cannot do math for the rest of summer due to family reasons, and the only time I have is winter break

do you guys think it's enough time to practice/grind to qualify mop through USAMO, or should I tell my parents to reschedule the stuff because I really want to make mop

(Note: I'm aiming for like 25+ on USAMO so at least silver but I'm not sure that's realistic given the circumstances i'm in)
3 replies
hashbrown2009
4 hours ago
mhgelgi
2 hours ago
How to PHO Qual
itsjeyanth   1
N 2 hours ago by BelowAverageAsian
Hi guys, I wanted to try out physics, this year I got a 14 on the f=ma and missed the usahpo cutoff by 1 point. But I am pretty bad at physics so I wanted to do a class to get better, I was wondering like what books or classes I should take, do you guys think physwoot would be a good fit? Would I struggle too much?
1 reply
itsjeyanth
3 hours ago
BelowAverageAsian
2 hours ago
four point lie on circle
Kizaruno   0
3 hours ago
Let triangle ABC be inscribed in a circle with center O. A line d intersects sides AB and AC at points E and D, respectively. Let M, N, and P be the midpoints of segments BD, CE, and DE, respectively. Let Q be the foot of the perpendicular from O to line DE. Prove that the points M, N, P, and Q lie on a circle.
0 replies
Kizaruno
3 hours ago
0 replies
Inequalities
sqing   0
4 hours ago
Let $ a,b>0, a^2+ab+b^2 \geq 6  $. Prove that
$$a^4+ab+b^4\geq 10$$Let $ a,b>0, a^2+ab+b^2 \leq \sqrt{10}  $. Prove that
$$a^4+ab+b^4  \leq 10$$Let $ a,b>0,  a^2+ab+b^2 \geq \frac{15}{2}  $. Prove that
$$ a^4-ab+b^4\geq 10$$Let $ a,b>0,  a^2+ab+b^2 \leq \sqrt{10}  $. Prove that
$$-\frac{1}{8}\leq  a^4-ab+b^4\leq 10$$
0 replies
sqing
4 hours ago
0 replies
Range if \omega for No Inscribed Right Triangle y = \sin(\omega x)
ThisIsJoe   0
4 hours ago
For a positive number \omega , determine the range of \omega for which the curve y = \sin(\omega x) has no inscribed right triangle.
Could someone help me figure out how to approach this?
0 replies
ThisIsJoe
4 hours ago
0 replies
Interesting question from Al-Khwarezmi olympiad 2024 P3, day1
Adventure1000   1
N 5 hours ago by pooh123
Find all $x, y, z \in \left (0, \frac{1}{2}\right )$ such that
$$
\begin{cases}
(3 x^{2}+y^{2}) \sqrt{1-4 z^{2}} \geq z; \\
(3 y^{2}+z^{2}) \sqrt{1-4 x^{2}} \geq x; \\
(3 z^{2}+x^{2}) \sqrt{1-4 y^{2}} \geq y.
\end{cases}
$$Proposed by Ngo Van Trang, Vietnam
1 reply
Adventure1000
Yesterday at 4:10 PM
pooh123
5 hours ago
one nice!
MihaiT   3
N 5 hours ago by Pin123
Find positiv integer numbers $(a,b) $ s.t. $\frac{a}{b-2}  $ and $\frac{3b-6}{a-3}$ be positiv integer numbers.
3 replies
MihaiT
Jan 14, 2025
Pin123
5 hours ago
Acute Angle Altitudes... say that ten times fast
Math-lover1   1
N 6 hours ago by pooh123
In acute triangle $ABC$, points $D$ and $E$ are the feet of the angle bisector and altitude from $A$, respectively. Suppose that $AC-AB=36$ and $DC-DB=24$. Compute $EC-EB$.
1 reply
Math-lover1
Yesterday at 11:30 PM
pooh123
6 hours ago
Find a and b such that a^2 = (a-b)^3 + b and a and b are coprimes
picysm   2
N Today at 8:28 AM by picysm
it is given that a and b are coprime to each other and a, b belong to N*
2 replies
picysm
Apr 25, 2025
picysm
Today at 8:28 AM
Algebra problem
Deomad123   1
N Today at 8:28 AM by lbh_qys
Let $n$ be a positive integer.Prove that there is a polynomial $P$ with integer coefficients so that $a+b+c=0$,then$$a^{2n+1}+b^{2n+1}+c^{2n+1}=abc[P(a,b)+P(b,c)+P(a,c)]$$.
1 reply
Deomad123
May 3, 2025
lbh_qys
Today at 8:28 AM
Palindrome
Darealzolt   1
N Today at 8:01 AM by ehz2701
Find the number of six-digit palindromic numbers that are divisible by \( 37 \).
1 reply
Darealzolt
Today at 4:13 AM
ehz2701
Today at 8:01 AM
Geometry Proof
strongstephen   17
N Today at 3:59 AM by ohiorizzler1434
Proof that choosing four distinct points at random has an equal probability of getting a convex quadrilateral vs a concave one.
not cohesive proof alert!

NOTE: By choosing four distinct points, that means no three points lie on the same line on the Gaussian Plane.
NOTE: The probability of each point getting chosen don’t need to be uniform (as long as it is symmetric about the origin), you just need a way to choose points in the infinite plane (such as a normal distribution)

Start by picking three of the four points. Next, graph the regions where the fourth point would make the quadrilateral convex or concave. In diagram 1 below, you can see the regions where the fourth point would be convex or concave. Of course, there is the centre region (the shaded triangle), but in an infinite plane, the probability the fourth point ends up in the finite region approaches 0.

Next, I want to prove to you the area of convex/concave, or rather, the probability a point ends up in each area, is the same. Referring to the second diagram, you can flip each concave region over the line perpendicular to the angle bisector of which the region is defined. (Just look at it and you'll get what it means.) Now, each concave region has an almost perfect 1:1 probability correspondence to another convex region. The only difference is the finite region (the triangle, shaded). Again, however, the actual significance (probability) of this approaches 0.

If I call each of the convex region's probability P(a), P(c), and P(e) and the concave ones P(b), P(d), P(f), assuming areas a and b are on opposite sides (same with c and d, e and f) you can get:
P(a) = P(b)
P(c) = P(d)
P(e) = P(f)

and P(a) + P(c) + P(e) = P(convex)
and P(b) + P(d) + P(f) = P(concave)

therefore:
P(convex) = P(concave)
17 replies
strongstephen
May 6, 2025
ohiorizzler1434
Today at 3:59 AM
Moving P(o)in(t)s
bobthegod78   70
N Apr 25, 2025 by Ilikeminecraft
Source: USAJMO 2021/4
Carina has three pins, labeled $A, B$, and $C$, respectively, located at the origin of the coordinate plane. In a move, Carina may move a pin to an adjacent lattice point at distance $1$ away. What is the least number of moves that Carina can make in order for triangle $ABC$ to have area 2021?

(A lattice point is a point $(x, y)$ in the coordinate plane where $x$ and $y$ are both integers, not necessarily positive.)
70 replies
bobthegod78
Apr 15, 2021
Ilikeminecraft
Apr 25, 2025
Moving P(o)in(t)s
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
Source: USAJMO 2021/4
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
channing421
1353 posts
#60
Y by
sketch
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
ihatemath123
3446 posts
#61
Y by
basic idea
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
huashiliao2020
1292 posts
#62
Y by
kind of a boring problem, construction is just weird

The answer is 128. First note that the area of a triangle is at most half of the area of the box around it (with sides parallel to the axes), because if you place three of the vertices on the corners of the box, moving any of them decreases the area. Now note that in n moves, by AM-GM this box has area at most $(\tfrac{n}{2})^2$. Indeed, this implies that for a triangle with 2021 area, you need a box of area at least 4042, so n is at least $2\sqrt{4042}$, or 128 moves. This intuition can be checked also because 63x64/2 is not enough, while 64x64/2 is more than 2021.

As for the construction, WLOG A=(0,0); noticing that 2048 maximal area is not far from 2021, we still want our vertices close to 64,0 and 0,64 to see if it's possible, which can easily be guessed and checked by Shoelace to find B and C have coordinates 10,63 and 64,-1.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Jndd
1416 posts
#63
Y by
First, to get from the origin to some point, say $(x,y)$, the minimum number of moves to get to there is $|x|+|y|$. One possible construction is $A=(-1, 54)$, $B=(63,0)$, $C=(0,-10)$, and we can verify the area is $2021$ using the Shoelace Theorem, and the number of moves is \[\lvert-1\rvert+|54|+|63|+|0|+|0|+\lvert-10\rvert=128.\]We claim that $128$ is in fact the minimum possible number of moves, and we'll prove it. First, create a rectangle $R$ with sides parallel to the axes such that it's the smallest rectangle that contains all of the points $A, B, C$, and clearly, one of $A$, $B$, and $C$ must be a vertex of $R$. WLOG, let $C$ be a vertex of $R$, $A$ be on a line parallel to the x-axis, and $B$ be on a line parallel to the y-axis. Then, draw a line $\ell_1$ parallel to the y-axis from $A$, draw a line $\ell_2$ parallel to the x-axis from $B$, and call their intersection $P$.

Now, we show it's optimal for us to start at $P$. Let $O$ be our starting point, so that it's a distance $d_1$ from $\ell_1$ and a distance $d_2$ from $\ell_2$. Notice that shifting $O$ onto line $\ell_1$ will decrease the number of moves to get from $O$ to the points $A$ and $B$ by $d_1$, while increasing the number of moves to get from $O$ to $C$ by $d_1$, if $O$ is to the right of $\ell_1$. Otherwise, if $O$ is to the left of $\ell_1$, it will decrease the number of moves to get from $O$ to the points $A$ and $C$ by $d_1$, while increasing the number of moves to get from $O$ to $B$ by $d_1$. Either way, the total decrease of the number of moves is $d_1+d_1-d_1=d_1$, which is good. Similarly, shifting $O$ onto $\ell_2$ decreases the number of total moves needed by $d_2$. So, once we shift $O$ onto both $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$, we have $O=P$.

Then, we see that the total number of moves starting from $P$ is $w+\ell$ where $w$ is the width of $R$, and $\ell$ is the length (or height) of $R$. Now, we show that the maximum area of $ABC$ is half the area of $R$. Let $\ell_1$ intersect the bottom edge of $R$ at $P_1$ and let $\ell_2$ intersect the left edge of $R$ at $P_2$. Then, it's not hard to show that $[AP_1CB]=[ABP_2C]=[R]/2$, so since $[AP_1CB] = [ABC]+[AP_1C]$ and $[ABP_2C]=[ABC]+[BP_2C]$, meaning $[ABC]\leq [R]/2$, as desired.

Now, in the case of $A=(-1, 54)$, $B=(63,0)$, $C=(0,-10)$, we have $w=\ell=64$, which gives $[ABC]\leq 64^2/2 = 2048$, which has a possible construction since $2021<2048$. However, if we had $w+\ell < 128$, then the maximum possible value of $[R]/2$ would be $w\ell/2 = 63\cdot 64/2 = 2016 < 2021$, which implies there is no possible construction if $w+\ell < 128$, so we're done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
peace09
5419 posts
#64 • 1 Y
Y by OronSH
Silly Bound
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
asdf334
7585 posts
#65
Y by
oh no i have ptsd1
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
joshualiu315
2534 posts
#66
Y by
Define the $\textit{bounding box}$ of $ABC$ to be the smallest axis-parallel rectangle that contains $ABC$.


Lemma: The area of $ABC$ is at most half the area of the bounding box.

Proof: Suppose the bounding box is $AXYZ$. If we fix $C$ and only vary $B$ around the perimeter of the rectangle, the maximal area must be achieved when $B$ coincides with one of the corners of the rectangles.

Manually checking each case, we find that the area of $ABC$ is at most half the area of $AXYZ$. $\square$


We proceed by making a claim.


Claim: After $n$ moves, the bounding box has area at most $\frac{n^2}{4}$.

Proof: The sum of the width and height of the bounding box increases by at most $1$ each move. Hence, letting the length equal $l$ and the width $w$, we obtain $l+w=n$, at which point the result follows by AM-GM. $\square$


The claim implies a bounding box of area $A$ requires at least $\lceil 2 \sqrt{A} \rceil$ moves, implying that $n \ge 128$.

Now, we must find a construction for $n=128$. The following construction works:

\begin{align*}
    A &= (-3,-18) \\
    B&= (61,0) \\
    C &= (0,46)
\end{align*}
so the answer is $n=128$. $\square$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
shendrew7
795 posts
#67
Y by
The following two results can be easily proven with some unfortunately bashy case analysis:
  • The area of a triangle is at most half of the area its "bounding rectangle", or the smallest rectangle with axes-parallel sides containing the triangle.
  • The sum of the taxicab distances from a point to the three vertices of a triangle is at least the sum of the dimensions of its "bounding rectangle". We can set this optimal point to be our origin.

Note our the area of our bounding rectangle is at least $2 \cdot 2021 = 4042$, from which AM-GM gives us a bound of $\lceil 2\sqrt{2024} \rceil = \boxed{128}$. A construction of this case uses the points $(0,55)$, $(58,0)$, and $(-6,-9)$ with bounding rectangle of dimensions $64 \times 64$. $\blacksquare$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by shendrew7, Dec 20, 2023, 11:28 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
EpicBird08
1751 posts
#68
Y by
When mocking this JMO I thought the maximum area was $133$ :noo: This time around I had to look at hints from ARCH :skull:

The answer is $128.$

First, define the surrounding rectangle of a triangle as the smallest rectangle with sides parallel to the axes that contains a triangle. It is pretty easy to see (e.g. by an area bash) that the area of the surrounding rectangle is at least twice as large as the area of the triangle. Every move, the sidelength of exactly one side increases by $1$. Thus the area of the surrounding rectangle after every move is at most equal to $\frac{n^2}{2},$ so the area of the triangle is at most equal to $\frac{n^2}{4}.$ This must be greater than or equal to $2021,$ so $n \ge 128.$

A construction for $n = 128$ is $(-2,-27), (0, 62), (37, 0).$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Markas
105 posts
#70
Y by
Denote the surrounding rectangle of a triangle as the smallest rectangle with sides parallel to the axes that contains the triangle. The area of the triangle is at most half of the area of the surrounding rectangle, because if you place three of the vertices on the corners of the rectangle, moving any of them decreases the area. The sidelength of exactly one side increases by 1 $\Rightarrow$ the area of the surrounding rectangle after all n moves is at most $(\frac{n}{2})^2 = \frac{n^2}{4}$ $\Rightarrow$ the area of the triangle is at most $\frac{n^2}{8}$. But $\frac{n^2}{8} \geq 2021$, so $n \ge 128$.

A construction for n = 128 is A = (0,0); B = (1,64); C = (64,54).
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Siddharthmaybe
106 posts
#71
Y by
coolmath2017 wrote:
It's not 133 :(

lol I was so excited to see the answer and this the first thing that pops up :(
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
happypi31415
748 posts
#72 • 1 Y
Y by peace09
We claim that the answer is $\boxed{128}$. This can be achieved by taking the points $(-9,-6), (0.58),$ and $(55,0)$. (This construction can be found by just assuming that two points are always on the axes and playing around until the construction is found.)

For the bound, it is easy to see that if we let two points, starting from the origin, move $n$ units in total, then the rectangle whose diagonal is formed by these two points will be at least twice the triangles area, which implies that the triangle has area at most $2n^2$ by say, AM-GM. The minimum positive integer $n$ that satisfies this is $n=128$ so we're done.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
gladIasked
648 posts
#73
Y by
The answer is $\boxed{128}$ moves, achieved with $(0, 58)$, $(-55, 0)$, and $(9, -6)$.

Define the bounding box of $\triangle ABC$ as the smallest rectangle with sides parallel to the axes containing all three vertices. I claim that a triangle's area is at most twice the area of its bounding box. We have two cases; the case where one of the sides of the triangle coincides with a side of the bounding box is trivial to see. The other case is not much harder:
[asy]
     /* Geogebra to Asymptote conversion, documentation at artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki go to User:Azjps/geogebra */
import graph; size(5cm); 
real labelscalefactor = 0.5; /* changes label-to-point distance */
pen dps = linewidth(0.7) + fontsize(10); defaultpen(dps); /* default pen style */ 
pen dotstyle = black; /* point style */ 
real xmin = -5.320243582333011, xmax = 13.300111666175955, ymin = -2.57973075125075, ymax = 6.877837547794034;  /* image dimensions */
pen zzttqq = rgb(0.6,0.2,0); 

draw((0,0)--(0,3)--(4,3)--(4,0)--cycle, linewidth(1) + zzttqq); 
draw((4,0)--(0.9561426524876215,3.02725616889723)--(0,1.2831331838785818)--cycle, linewidth(1) + zzttqq); 
 /* draw figures */
draw((0,0)--(0,3), linewidth(1) + zzttqq); 
draw((0,3)--(4,3), linewidth(1) + zzttqq); 
draw((4,3)--(4,0), linewidth(1) + zzttqq); 
draw((4,0)--(0,0), linewidth(1) + zzttqq); 
draw((4,0)--(0.9561426524876215,3.02725616889723), linewidth(1) + zzttqq); 
draw((0.9561426524876215,3.02725616889723)--(0,1.2831331838785818), linewidth(1) + zzttqq); 
draw((0,1.2831331838785818)--(4,0), linewidth(1) + zzttqq); 
 /* dots and labels */
dot((0,0),linewidth(4pt) + dotstyle); 
label("$F$", (0.047233491280721025,0.09786650743985113), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((0,3),dotstyle); 
label("$E$", (0.047233491280721025,3.1193753406411715), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((4,3),dotstyle); 
label("$D$", (4.0513468230841,3.1193753406411715), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((4,0),dotstyle); 
label("$A$", (4.0513468230841,0.12243161990490252), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((0.9561426524876215,3.02725616889723),dotstyle); 
label("$B$", (1.0052728774177258,3.1562230093387487), NE * labelscalefactor); 
dot((0,1.2831331838785818),dotstyle); 
label("$C$", (-0.2,1.15), W * labelscalefactor); 
clip((xmin,ymin)--(xmin,ymax)--(xmax,ymax)--(xmax,ymin)--cycle); 
 /* end of picture */
[/asy]
Let $DE=b$, $AD=a$, $BE=x$, and $CE=y$. We have $[ABC]=ab-\left(\frac{xy+a(b-x)+b(a-y)}{2}\right)=\frac{ax+by-xy}{2}=\frac{ab}2-\frac{(a-y)(b-x)}{2}<\frac{ab}2$, as desired.

Note that a move increases one of the dimensions of the bounding box by exactly $1$ unit. Therefore, we have a lower bound of $\boxed{128}$ moves, which can produce a bouncing box with dimensions $64\times 64$ (less moves will produce a smaller bounding box).
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
akliu
1800 posts
#74
Y by
Consider the rectangular "bounding box" with perimeter $P$ of triangle $ABC$ bounded by lines $y = y_{min}$, $y = y_{max}$, $x = x_{min}$, and $x = x_{max}$, where $x_{min}, x_{max}$ are the smallest and largest $x$ coordinates out of pins $A$, $B$, and $C$, and $y_{min}$ and $y_{max}$ are defined similarly with respect to $y$ coordinates.

It can be proven by Shoelace that $[ABC] \leq \frac{1}{2} R$, where $R$ is the area of the rectangular bounding box. Since the rectangular bounding box's area is at most $\frac{P^2}{16}$, we have a bound of $[ABC] \leq \frac{P^2}{32}$. Since $[ABC] = 2021$, this gives us $P \geq 256$, since $P$ must be even.

Every move that Carina makes can increase the value of $P$ by at most $2$, meaning that we have a minimum of $128$ moves. A configuration that works would be $A = (5, 1), B = (-52, 0), C = (0, -70)$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Ilikeminecraft
619 posts
#75
Y by
Start by drawing the bounding box of the triangle(the lines parallel to the axis). It can be easily seen that the triangle has at most half the area of the bounding box.

Now, we claim that the max size of a bounding box after $n$ moves is $(n/2)^2.$ Notice that moving a pin by 1 will increase the width/height by at most 1. By AM-GM, that is the max.

Hence, to achieve an area of 2021 in $n$ moves, we have that $\frac12(n/2)^2 \geq 2021.$ Hence, $n\geq128.$ A construction is $A(0,55),B(58,0),C(-6,-9)$
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a