,
,
,
,
or even expressions of those terms combined as if that would make them defined. I have made this post to answer these questions once and for all, and I politely ask everyone to link this post to threads that are talking about this issue.
,
isn't even rigorously defined in this expression. What exactly do we mean by 
.
,
does not exist in the first place, although you will see why in a calculus course. So the point is that 
?
indeterminate? In analysis (the theory behind calculus and beyond), limits involving an algebraic combination of functions in an independent variable may often be evaluated by replacing these functions by their limits. However, if the expression obtained after this substitution does not provide sufficient information to determine the original limit, then the expression is called an indeterminate form. For example, we could say that 
,
or ![\[0/0, \infty/\infty, \infty-\infty, \infty \times 0\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/6/0/260f97a1cf1ea8722ff97a29b83bac7bfe83e577.png)
etc etc. So what makes something undefined? In the broader scope, something being undefined refers to an expression which is not assigned an interpretation or a value. A function is said to be undefined for points outside its domain. For example, the function 
given by the mapping 
is undefined for 
.
is undefined because dividing by ![\[\overline{\mathbb{R}}=\mathbb{R}\cup \{-\infty,+\infty\}.\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/9/3/993c78b62ec2c84b5d77daa8e9a8cd6f70fcf904.png)
So instead of treating infinity as an idea, we define infinity (positively and negatively, mind you) as actual numbers in the reals. The advantage of doing this is for two reasons. The first is because we can turn this thing into a totally ordered set. Specifically, we can let 
for each 
which means that via this order topology each subset has an infimum and supremum and 
is therefore compact. While this is nice from an analytic standpoint, extending the reals in this way can allow for interesting arithmetic! In ![\begin{align*}
a + \infty = \infty + a & = \infty, & a & \neq -\infty \\
a - \infty = -\infty + a & = -\infty, & a & \neq \infty \\
a \cdot (\pm\infty) = \pm\infty \cdot a & = \pm\infty, & a & \in (0, +\infty] \\
a \cdot (\pm\infty) = \pm\infty \cdot a & = \mp\infty, & a & \in [-\infty, 0) \\
\frac{a}{\pm\infty} & = 0, & a & \in \mathbb{R} \\
\frac{\pm\infty}{a} & = \pm\infty, & a & \in (0, +\infty) \\
\frac{\pm\infty}{a} & = \mp\infty, & a & \in (-\infty, 0).
\end{align*}](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/d/8/6d8fc1eca5c791d430a7168cd3b37a02104fa318.png)
So addition, multiplication, and division are all defined nicely. However, notice that we have some indeterminate forms here which are also undefined,![\[\infty-\infty,\frac{\pm\infty}{\pm\infty},\frac{\pm\infty}{0},0\cdot \pm\infty.\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/0/b/a0b67076efcc014c78b2023be1151c84b57c1503.png)
So while we define certain things, we also left others undefined/indeterminate in the process! However, in the context of measure theory it is common to define 
as greenturtle3141 noted below. I encourage to reread what he wrote, it's great stuff! As you may notice, though, dividing by ![\[\mathbb{C}^*=\mathbb{C}\cup\{\tilde{\infty}\}\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/4/e/84ed3d6ab237df970333b87beaef5311caa46185.png)
which we call the Riemann Sphere (it actually forms a sphere, pretty cool right?). As a note, 
means complex infinity, since we are in the complex plane now. Here's the catch: division by ![\[\frac{z}{0}=\tilde{\infty},\frac{z}{\tilde{\infty}}=0.\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/6/0/160cb939707708ff4e0930724df2928af11d7fd1.png)
where 
and 
Furthermore, we actually have some nice properties with multiplication that we didn't have before. In 
it holds that![\[\tilde{\infty}\times \tilde{\infty}=\tilde{\infty}\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/e/0/8e035b4841d20c5ad671c46355cc667ca01e533b.png)
but 
and 
are left as undefined (unless there is an explicit need to change that somehow). One could define the projectively extended reals as we did with ![\[{\widehat {\mathbb {R} }}=\mathbb {R} \cup \{\infty \}.\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/0/4/c044ff37849acad3b8b280b9753539225a1276ca.png)
They behave in a similar way to the Riemann Sphere, with division by 
positive integers have no single-digit prime factors?
,
or 
?
Y by claudiafeng, mathway, Grawr, Binomial-theorem, justinj149149, jkoj25, Blackhawk, bluecarneal, primewhole123456vani, Flower7, roderickhuang, jeff10, masad24, cutiepi8, ahaanomegas, doodlemaster7, SuperSnivy, Magnolia, froggygirl, AkshajK, sturdyoak2012, 155919, r31415, jeremylu, yrushi, RahymValiyev, jeffchen, mathsd, Ramanujam297, e_is_cool, fz0718, NeoMathematicalKid, bestwillcui1, mathman523, 171282, yugrey, qwerty137, bacca2002, HYP135peppers, Tungsten, bob2, TrueshotBarrage, awesomeguy2, Toad22222, RadioActive, Iamteehee, kangrui, Zoombini, SirMacalot, Zard, kj2002, sojourner1, swamih, theskyisthelimit, MathSlayer4444, soccermathcat, ninjasrule34, AKAL3, EpicSkills32, checkmatetang, celestialphoenix3768, zmyshatlp, Benq, irishfeet123, chocobunnny123, Sponge, solver1104, LJCoder619, hdrcure, NamePending, OlympusHero, TsunamiStorm08, Adventure10, Mango247, and 13 other users
(This is an addition to AIME15's post in another forum, and is a more modernized version of rrusczyk's post)
I'm not accusing anybody in particular of any of the following!
Being on Topic
Thread Title
Posting the Problem
What You Tried
Questions
Replies
Basic Etiquette
If you feel like the problem is too easy or hard, please use the Too Easy/Hard buttons (yes, self explanatory). levans spent quite a bit of time developing that, and it would be great if the community adopted it!
Here is the list of your moderators, always ready to help.
If you have any questions, please feel free to private message one of us.
I'm not accusing anybody in particular of any of the following!
Being on Topic
- Be sure to stay on topic in each specific thread; I've personally seen threads deviating greatly off topic. For example, a topic on Simple Arithmetic should not end in a display of Mathematica usage.
- Don't bother other people about straying off topic, the moderators will take note. (Some call this backseat moderation).
Thread Title
- Make your title fairly descriptive and concise. A good example is "MATHCOUNTS Number Theory"; a bad example is "HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Post the source of the problem.
Posting the Problem
- Use proper spelling and grammar (to the best of your abilities). People who are here to help you out don't want to wade through something like "if 3x/4-x+18=2 what is x".
- Attach a diagram when applicable.
- Search the problem before you post it.
What You Tried
- Post what you attempted, even if it may not have worked. We are not here to give you solutions, we are here to help you learn.
- Be detailed.
Questions
- Ask specific questions; it makes it easier for those helping you.
Replies
- Be respectful of the opinions given to you.
- If you disagree with a reply, cite examples or give some sort of analysis supporting why you disagree.
Basic Etiquette
- Don't make a post to thank somebody who has helped you; even though it is respectful, it clutters up the forum. Use the brand new thank function!
- Don't make a post to tell somebody to stop spamming. Private message them instead.
- Don't make a post asking a moderator to lock a thread. Private message the moderator instead.
- Please do not private message moderators with math related questions - those belong on the forums. (Note: I speak only for myself.)
If you feel like the problem is too easy or hard, please use the Too Easy/Hard buttons (yes, self explanatory). levans spent quite a bit of time developing that, and it would be great if the community adopted it!
Here is the list of your moderators, always ready to help.
If you have any questions, please feel free to private message one of us.
