ka April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.
WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.
Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!
Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29
Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28
Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19
Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30
Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14
Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19
Intermediate: Grades 8-12
Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)
AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21
AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22
Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:
To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.
More specifically:
For new threads:
a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.
Examples: Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿) Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"
b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.
Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".
c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote][/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.
For answers to already existing threads:
d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve , do not answer with " is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like " is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.
e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.
To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).
The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
Points lie on a circle and point lies outside the circle. The given points are such that (i) lines and are tangent to , (ii) are collinear, and (iii) . Prove that bisects .
Recently I;ve started doing a lot of nice combo/algebra Olympiad problems(JMO, PAGMO, CMO, etc.) and I’ve got to say, it’s been pretty fun(I’m enjoying it!). I was wondering if doing Olympiad problems also helps increase computational abilities slightly. Currently I am doing 75% computational, 25% oly but if anyone has any expreience I want to switch it to 25% computational and 75% Olympiad, though I still want to have computational skills for ARML, AIME, SMT, BMT, HMMT, etc.
Killer NT that nobody solved (also my hardest NT ever created)
mshtand110
Nan hour ago
by mshtand1
Source: Ukraine IMO 2025 TST P8
A positive integer number is chosen. Prove that there exists a prime number that divides infinitely many terms of the sequence , where Proposed by Arsenii Nikolaev and Mykhailo Shtandenko
1. ABCD a square
2. (A) the circle with center at A passing through B
3. P the points of intersection of the segment AC and (A)
4. I the midpoint of AB
5. Q the point of intersection of the segment IC and (A)
6. M the foot of the perpendicular to (AB) through Q.
7. Y the point of intersection of the segment MC and (A)
8. X the point of intersection de (AY) et (BC).
calculator operations limited, if S > x^n + 1 then S > x^n + x - 1
parmenides5113
Nan hour ago
by Ducksohappi
Source: Tuymaada 2019 p4
A calculator can square a number or add to it. It cannot add two times in a row. By several operations it transformed a number into a number ( are positive integers). Prove that .
Let be a triangle and the points and on , and on , and and on be such that and . The intersections of with and are and respectively, and the intersections of with and are and , respectively. Prove that the lines and are concurrent.
Alice & Eva take turns filling an empty table with 2^{100} rows and 100 columns
parmenides518
N2 hours ago
by N3bula
Source: 2020 International Olympiad of Metropolises P5
There is an empty table with rows and columns. Alice and Eva take turns filling the empty cells of the first row of the table, Alice plays first. In each move, Alice chooses an empty cell and puts a cross in it; Eva in each move chooses an empty cell and puts a zero. When no empty cells remain in the first row, the players move on to the second row, and so on (in each new row Alice plays first).
The game ends when all the rows are filled. Alice wants to make as many different rows in the table as possible, while Eva wants to make as few as possible. How many different rows will be there in the table if both follow their best strategies?
Complex numbers , and are the zeros of a polynomial , and . The points corresponding to ,, and in the complex plane are the vertices of a right triangle with hypotenuse . Find .
Proof: Expand the right side using FOIL as mandated by the federal government, giving . By the commutative property of multiplication, , so .
Sublemma 1.2: for any arbitrary value of .
Proof: Note that since by the identity property, subtracting from both sides gives , as desired.
By Sublemma 1.2, we get that , and since by the commutative property of addition, we get that . Thus, , which by the commutative property of addition is equal to . Since , we get . Substitute . Then by the identity property, so thus .
Consequently, as desired, we have proved that .
Looking at the problem, we wish to use Lemma 1.1. If we let ,, and , then we can use Lemma 1.1 to give Expanding gives We can rearrange the first, second, third, and fourth terms in each set of brackets into their own sets of brackets individually by the commutative property of addition, so hence we get Let and . Substitution gives that is equal to Cleverly, we note that , so substituting into gives By Sublemma 1.2, we get that , so thus Let . Then by the identity property, so .
We are now ready for the brutal answer extraction. Expanding the squares, we get that . We have that ,, and , so consequently
By the commutative property of addition, we rearrange this equation to give . Factoring the common factor of out of , we get ; factoring the common factor of out of , we get ; finally, factoring the common factor of out of , we get . Thus, , so by order of operations, the desired answer is thus
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by pog, Oct 19, 2021, 3:28 PM
Proof: Expand the right side using FOIL as mandated by the federal government, giving . By the commutative property of multiplication, , so .
Sublemma 1.2: for any arbitrary value of .
Proof: Note that since by the identity property, subtracting from both sides gives , as desired.
By Sublemma 1.2, we get that , and since by the commutative property of addition, we get that . Thus, , which by the commutative property of addition is equal to . Since , we get . Substitute . Then by the identity property, so thus .
Consequently, as desired, we have proved that .
Looking at the problem, we wish to use Lemma 1.1. If we let ,, and , then we can use Lemma 1.1 to give Expanding gives We can rearrange the first, second, third, and fourth terms in each set of brackets into their own sets of brackets individually by the commutative property of addition, so hence we get Let and . Substitution gives that is equal to Cleverly, we note that , so substituting into gives By Sublemma 1.2, we get that , so thus Let . Then by the identity property, so .
We are now ready for the brutal answer extraction. Expanding the squares, we get that . We have that ,, and , so consequently
By the commutative property of addition, we rearrange this equation to give . Factoring the common factor of out of , we get , factoring the common factor of out of , we get , and factoring the common factor of out of , we get . Thus, . By order of operations, the desired answer is thus
Proof: Expand the right side using FOIL as mandated by the federal government, giving . By the commutative property of multiplication, , so .
Sublemma 1.2: for any arbitrary value of .
Proof: Note that since by the identity property, subtracting from both sides gives , as desired.
By Sublemma 1.2, we get that , and since by the commutative property of addition, we get that . Thus, , which by the commutative property of addition is equal to . Since , we get . Substitute . Then by the identity property, so thus .
Consequently, as desired, we have proved that .
Looking at the problem, we wish to use Lemma 1.1. If we let ,, and , then we can use Lemma 1.1 to give Expanding gives We can rearrange the first, second, third, and fourth terms in each set of brackets into their own sets of brackets individually by the commutative property of addition, so hence we get Let and . Substitution gives that is equal to Cleverly, we note that , so substituting into gives By Sublemma 1.2, we get that , so thus Let . Then by the identity property, so .
We are now ready for the brutal answer extraction. Expanding the squares, we get that . We have that ,, and , so consequently
By the commutative property of addition, we rearrange this equation to give . Factoring the common factor of out of , we get , factoring the common factor of out of , we get , and factoring the common factor of out of , we get . Thus, . By order of operations, the desired answer is thus
I upvoted this not because it was a nice solution or was a troll, but because of the sheer amount of time and energy you had to have put into making this. Respect.
@pog I think you didn't make it hard enough on yourself. Remember to include the proof for ; alternatively, you can leave this as an exercise to the reader.
@pog I think you didn't make it hard enough on yourself. Remember to include the proof for ; alternatively, you can leave this as an exercise to the reader.
Too hard for AMC.. Problems using obscure results should not be on the AMC. The key is the following lemma proved by Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell.
Principia Mathematica wrote:
Now note that
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Afo, Oct 19, 2021, 2:37 AM
Proof: Expand the right side using FOIL as mandated by the federal government, giving . By the commutative property of multiplication, , so .
Sublemma 1.2: for any arbitrary value of .
Proof: Note that since by the identity property, subtracting from both sides gives , as desired.
By Sublemma 1.2, we get that , and since by the commutative property of addition, we get that . Thus, , which by the commutative property of addition is equal to . Since , we get . Substitute . Then by the identity property, so thus .
Consequently, as desired, we have proved that .
Looking at the problem, we wish to use Lemma 1.1. If we let ,, and , then we can use Lemma 1.1 to give Expanding gives We can rearrange the first, second, third, and fourth terms in each set of brackets into their own sets of brackets individually by the commutative property of addition, so hence we get Let and . Substitution gives that is equal to Cleverly, we note that , so substituting into gives By Sublemma 1.2, we get that , so thus Let . Then by the identity property, so .
We are now ready for the brutal answer extraction. Expanding the squares, we get that . We have that ,, and , so consequently
By the commutative property of addition, we rearrange this equation to give . Factoring the common factor of out of , we get , factoring the common factor of out of , we get , and factoring the common factor of out of , we get . Thus, . By order of operations, the desired answer is thus
Exactly how I would've done it. Great solution. Very concise.
UPVOTED!
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by mahaler, Oct 19, 2021, 1:19 PM
Proof: Expand the right side using FOIL as mandated by the federal government, giving . By the commutative property of multiplication, , so .
Sublemma 1.2: for any arbitrary value of .
Proof: Note that since by the identity property, subtracting from both sides gives , as desired.
By Sublemma 1.2, we get that , and since by the commutative property of addition, we get that . Thus, , which by the commutative property of addition is equal to . Since , we get . Substitute . Then by the identity property, so thus .
Consequently, as desired, we have proved that .
Looking at the problem, we wish to use Lemma 1.1. If we let ,, and , then we can use Lemma 1.1 to give Expanding gives We can rearrange the first, second, third, and fourth terms in each set of brackets into their own sets of brackets individually by the commutative property of addition, so hence we get Let and . Substitution gives that is equal to Cleverly, we note that , so substituting into gives By Sublemma 1.2, we get that , so thus Let . Then by the identity property, so .
We are now ready for the brutal answer extraction. Expanding the squares, we get that . We have that ,, and , so consequently
By the commutative property of addition, we rearrange this equation to give . Factoring the common factor of out of , we get , factoring the common factor of out of , we get , and factoring the common factor of out of , we get . Thus, . By order of operations, the desired answer is thus
Exactly how I would've done it. Great solution. Very concise.
Proof: Expand the right side using FOIL as mandated by the federal government, giving . By the commutative property of multiplication, , so .
Sublemma 1.2: for any arbitrary value of .
Proof: Note that since by the identity property, subtracting from both sides gives , as desired.
By Sublemma 1.2, we get that , and since by the commutative property of addition, we get that . Thus, , which by the commutative property of addition is equal to . Since , we get . Substitute . Then by the identity property, so thus .
Consequently, as desired, we have proved that .
Looking at the problem, we wish to use Lemma 1.1. If we let ,, and , then we can use Lemma 1.1 to give Expanding gives We can rearrange the first, second, third, and fourth terms in each set of brackets into their own sets of brackets individually by the commutative property of addition, so hence we get Let and . Substitution gives that is equal to Cleverly, we note that , so substituting into gives By Sublemma 1.2, we get that , so thus Let . Then by the identity property, so .
We are now ready for the brutal answer extraction. Expanding the squares, we get that . We have that ,, and , so consequently
By the commutative property of addition, we rearrange this equation to give . Factoring the common factor of out of , we get ; factoring the common factor of out of , we get ; finally, factoring the common factor of out of , we get . Thus, , so by order of operations, the desired answer is thus