Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
f(a)=a,-a
Physicsknight   20
N 19 minutes ago by atdaotlohbh
Source: RMMSL-19 A1
Determine all the functions $f:\mathbb R\mapsto\mathbb R$ satisfies the equation
$f(a^2 +ab+ f(b^2))=af(b)+b^2+ f(a^2)\,\forall a,b\in\mathbb R $
20 replies
Physicsknight
May 27, 2020
atdaotlohbh
19 minutes ago
For positive integers \( a, b, c \), find all possible positive integer values o
Jackson0423   7
N 25 minutes ago by blug
For positive integers \( a, b, c \), find all possible positive integer values of
\[
\frac{a}{b} + \frac{b}{c} + \frac{c}{a}.
\]
7 replies
Jackson0423
Today at 8:35 AM
blug
25 minutes ago
combinatorics
gggzul   0
27 minutes ago
Source: local competition
Does there exist an infinite set of positive integers $S$ with the following property: the sum of the elements of any finite subset of $S$ is not a power of an integer with an exponent greater than 1?
0 replies
gggzul
27 minutes ago
0 replies
binomial sum
jonny   2
N 29 minutes ago by MS_asdfgzxcvb
for every positive integer $n,$ prove that $\sum_{k=0}^{n^2}(-1)^k\frac{\binom{n^2}{k}}{\binom{n+k}{k}} = \frac{1}{n+1}$
2 replies
jonny
Feb 24, 2012
MS_asdfgzxcvb
29 minutes ago
thank you
Piwbo   3
N 30 minutes ago by Safal
Let $p_n$ be the n-th prime number in increasing order for $n\geq 1$. Prove that there exists a sequence of distinct prime numbers $q_n$ satisfying $q_1+q_2+...+q_n=p_n$ for all $n\geq 1 $
3 replies
Piwbo
Apr 10, 2025
Safal
30 minutes ago
Tricky Determinant
Saucepan_man02   3
N 31 minutes ago by rchokler
$$A=\begin{bmatrix}
1+x^2-y^2-z^2 & 2xy+2z & 2zx-2y\\
2xy-2z & 1+y^2-x^2-z^2 & 2yz+2x\\
2xz+2y & 2yz-2x & 1+z^2-x^2-y^2\\
\end{bmatrix}$$Find $\det(A)$.
3 replies
Saucepan_man02
Yesterday at 12:16 PM
rchokler
31 minutes ago
Symmetric inequality
Natrium   0
31 minutes ago
Source: Own
Prove that for all $a,b,c>0$:

$$\sum_{\text{cyc}}\frac{36a^2+12ab+12bc+12ca}{28a^2+b^2+c^2+14ab+14bc+14ca}\le 3$$
0 replies
Natrium
31 minutes ago
0 replies
The sum of reciproal of the product of coprime pairs
maomaodog   2
N 35 minutes ago by maomaodog
Let n be a positive integer. Consider all the pairs (a,b) such that

- a,b≤n
- a+b>n
- a and b are coprime.

Find the sum of 1/ab for all of these pairs (a,b) in terms of n.
2 replies
maomaodog
an hour ago
maomaodog
35 minutes ago
Interesting Inequality
Jackson0423   0
43 minutes ago
Let \( a_1, a_2, \dots, a_{2024} \) be real numbers that satisfy the condition:
\[
a_i \cdot a_j \geq i^2 - j^2 \quad \text{for all} \quad 1 \leq i \leq j \leq 2024.
\]What is the minimum value of \( a_1 + a_2 + \dots + a_{2024} \)?
0 replies
Jackson0423
43 minutes ago
0 replies
Pyramid packing in sphere
smartvong   0
an hour ago
Source: own
Let $A_1$ and $B$ be two points that are diametrically opposite to each other on a unit sphere. $n$ right square pyramids are fitted along the line segment $\overline{A_1B}$, such that the apex and altitude of each pyramid $i$, where $1\le i\le n$, are $A_i$ and $\overline{A_iA_{i+1}}$ respectively, and the points $A_1, A_2, \dots, A_n, A_{n+1}, B$ are collinear.

(a) Find the maximum total volume of $n$ pyramids, with altitudes of equal length, that can be fitted in the sphere, in terms of $n$.

(b) Find the maximum total volume of $n$ pyramids that can be fitted in the sphere, in terms of $n$.

(c) Find the maximum total volume of the pyramids that can be fitted in the sphere as $n$ tends to infinity.

Note: The altitudes of the pyramids are not necessarily equal in length for (b) and (c).
0 replies
smartvong
an hour ago
0 replies
Geometry marathon
HoRI_DA_GRe8   844
N an hour ago by aidenkim119
Ok so there's been no geo marathon here for more than 2 years,so lets start one,rules remain same.
1st problem.
Let $PQRS$ be a cyclic quadrilateral with $\angle PSR=90°$ and let $H$ and $K$ be the feet of altitudes from $Q$ to the lines $PR$ and $PS$,.Prove $HK$ bisects $QS$.
P.s._eeezy ,try without ss line.
844 replies
HoRI_DA_GRe8
Sep 5, 2021
aidenkim119
an hour ago
Interesting inequality
A_E_R   2
N 2 hours ago by A_E_R
Let a,b,c,d are positive real numbers, if the following inequality holds ab^2+ac^2>=5bcd. Find the minimum value of explanation: (a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2)(1/a^2+1/b^2+1/c^2+1/d^2)
2 replies
A_E_R
Today at 9:41 AM
A_E_R
2 hours ago
one cyclic formed by two cyclic
CrazyInMath   10
N 2 hours ago by InterLoop
Source: EGMO 2025/3
Let $ABC$ be an acute triangle. Points $B, D, E$, and $C$ lie on a line in this order and satisfy $BD = DE = EC$. Let $M$ and $N$ be the midpoints of $AD$ and $AE$, respectively. Suppose triangle $ADE$ is acute, and let $H$ be its orthocentre. Points $P$ and $Q$ lie on lines $BM$ and $CN$, respectively, such that $D, H, M,$ and $P$ are concyclic and pairwise different, and $E, H, N,$ and $Q$ are concyclic and pairwise different. Prove that $P, Q, N,$ and $M$ are concyclic.
10 replies
+1 w
CrazyInMath
5 hours ago
InterLoop
2 hours ago
High School Integration Extravaganza Problem Set
Riemann123   13
N 5 hours ago by mygoodfriendusesaops
Source: River Hill High School Spring Integration Bee
Hello AoPS!

Along with user geodash2, I have organized another high-school integration bee (River Hill High School Spring Integration Bee) and wanted to share the problems!

We had enough folks for two concurrent rooms, hence the two sets. (ARML kids from across the county came.)

Keep in mind that these integrals were written for a high-school contest-math audience. I hope you find them enjoyable and insightful; enjoy!


[center]Warm Up Problems[/center]
\[
\int_{1}^{2} \frac{x^{3}+x^2}{x^5}dx
\]\[\int_{2025}^{2025^{2025}}\frac{1}{\ln\left(2025\right)\cdot x}dx\]\[
\int(\sin^2(x)+\cos^2(x)+\sec^2(x)+\csc^2(x))dx
\]\[
\int_{-2025.2025}^{2025.2025}\sin^{2025}(2025x)\cos^{2025}(2025x)dx
\]\[
    \int_{\frac \pi 6}^{\frac \pi 3} \tan(\theta)^2d\theta
\]\[
\int  \frac{1+\sqrt{t}}{1+t}dt
\]-----
[center]Easier Division Set 1[/center]
\[\int \frac{x^{2}+2x+1}{x^{3}+3x^{2}+3x+3}dx
\]\[\int_{0}^{\frac{3\pi}{2}}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-x\right)\sin\left(x\right)dx\]\[
\int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2}x^3e^{-x^2}\cos(x^2)\sin^2(x)dx
\]\[
\int\frac{1}{\sqrt{12-t^{2}+4t}}dt
\]\[
\int \frac{\sqrt{e^{8x}}}{e^{8x}-1}dx
\]-----
[center]Easier Division Set 2[/center]
\[
\int \frac{e^x}{e^{2x}+1} dx
\]\[
\int_{-5}^5\sqrt{25-u^2}du
\]\[
\int_{-\frac12}^\frac121+x+x^2+x^3\ldots dx
\]\[\int \cos(\cos(\cos(\ln \theta)))\sin(\cos(\ln \theta))\sin(\ln \theta)\frac{1}{\theta}d\theta\]\[\int_{0}^{\frac{1}{6}}\frac{8^{2x}}{64^{2x}-8^{\left(2x+\frac{1}{3}\right)}+2}dx\]-----
[center]Harder Division Set 1[/center]
\[\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\sin\left(x\right)}{\sin\left(x\right)+\cos\left(x\right)}+\frac{\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-x\right)}{\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-x\right)+\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-x\right)}dx\]\[
\int_0^{\infty}e^{-x}\Bigl(\cos(20x)+\sin(20x)\Bigr) dx
\]\[
\lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{1}{n}\int_{1}^{n}\sin(nt)^2dt
\]\[
\int_{x=0}^{x=1}\left( \int_{y=-x}^{y=x} \frac{y^2}{x^2+y^2}dy\right)dx
\]\[
\int_{0}^{13}\left\lceil\log_{10}\left(2^{\lceil x\rceil }x\right)\right\rceil dx
\]-----
[center]Harder Division Set 2[/center]
\[
\int \frac{6x^2}{x^6+2x^3+2}dx
\]\[
\int -\sin(2\theta)\cos(\theta)d\theta
\]\[
\int_{0}^{5}\sin(\frac{\pi}2 \lfloor{x}\rfloor x) dx
\]\[
\int_{0}^{1} \frac{\sin^{-1}(\sqrt{x})^2}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}dx
\]\[
\int\left(\cot(\theta)+\tan(\theta)\right)^2\cot(2\theta)^{100}d\theta
\]-----
[center]Bonanza Round (ie Fun/Hard/Weird Problems) (In No Particular Order)[/center]
\[
\int \ln\left\{\sqrt[7]{x}^\frac1{\ln\left\{\sqrt[5]{x}^\frac1{\ln\left\{\sqrt[3]{x}^\frac1{\ln\left\{\sqrt{x}\right\}}\right\}}\right\}}\right\}dx
\]\[\int_{1}^{{e}^{\pi}} \cos(\ln(\sqrt{u}))du\]\[
\int_e^{\infty}\frac {1-x\ln{x}}{xe^x}dx
\]\[\int_{0}^{1}\frac{e^{x}}{\left(x^{2}+3x+2\right)^{\frac{1}{2^{1}}}}\times\frac{e^{-\frac{x^{2}}{2}}}{\left(x^{2}+3x+2\right)^{\frac{1}{2^{2}}}}\times\frac{e^{\frac{x^{3}}{3}}}{\left(x^{2}+3x+2\right)^{\frac{1}{2^{3}}}}\times\frac{e^{-\frac{x^{4}}{4}}}{\left(x^{2}+3x+2\right)^{\frac{1}{2^{4}}}} \ldots \,dx\]
For $x$ on the domain $-0.2025\leq x\leq 0.2025$ it is known that \[\displaystyle f(x)=\sin\left(\int_{0}^x \sqrt[3]{\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2} t\right)^3+26}\ dt\right)\]is invertible. What is $\displaystyle (f^{-1})'(0)$?
13 replies
Riemann123
Apr 11, 2025
mygoodfriendusesaops
5 hours ago
Putnam 2019 A3
djmathman   13
N May 8, 2024 by lifeismathematics
Given real numbers $b_0,b_1,\ldots, b_{2019}$ with $b_{2019}\neq 0$, let $z_1,z_2,\ldots, z_{2019}$ be the roots in the complex plane of the polynomial
\[
P(z) = \sum_{k=0}^{2019}b_kz^k.
\]Let $\mu = (|z_1|+ \cdots + |z_{2019}|)/2019$ be the average of the distances from $z_1,z_2,\ldots, z_{2019}$ to the origin.  Determine the largest constant $M$ such that $\mu\geq M$ for all choices of $b_0,b_1,\ldots, b_{2019}$ that satisfy
\[
1\leq b_0 < b_1 < b_2 < \cdots < b_{2019} \leq 2019.
\]
13 replies
djmathman
Dec 10, 2019
lifeismathematics
May 8, 2024
Putnam 2019 A3
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
djmathman
7937 posts
#1 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Rounak_iitr
Given real numbers $b_0,b_1,\ldots, b_{2019}$ with $b_{2019}\neq 0$, let $z_1,z_2,\ldots, z_{2019}$ be the roots in the complex plane of the polynomial
\[
P(z) = \sum_{k=0}^{2019}b_kz^k.
\]Let $\mu = (|z_1|+ \cdots + |z_{2019}|)/2019$ be the average of the distances from $z_1,z_2,\ldots, z_{2019}$ to the origin.  Determine the largest constant $M$ such that $\mu\geq M$ for all choices of $b_0,b_1,\ldots, b_{2019}$ that satisfy
\[
1\leq b_0 < b_1 < b_2 < \cdots < b_{2019} \leq 2019.
\]
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by djmathman, Sep 14, 2020, 1:20 PM
Reason: Title
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
awesomemathlete
120 posts
#2 • 3 Y
Y by Rebel_1, Akaishuichi9598, Adventure10
By AM-GM we have that $\frac{|z_1|+|z_2|+\dots+|z_{2019}|}{2019}\ge(|z_1|\cdot|z_2|\cdots|z_{2019}|)^{\frac{1}{2019}}=\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}^{\frac{1}{2019}}\ge\boxed{\frac{1}{2019}^{\frac{1}{2019}}}=M$. Equality is achieved when all the roots have magnitude $M$. For example the $2020^{\text{th}}$ roots of unity excluding $1$ multiplied by $M$ are the roots of: $2019\cdot\frac{x^{2020}-M^{2020}}{x-M}=2019(x^{2019}+Mx^{2018}+\dots+M^{2019})$ which satisfies the desired constraints on the coefficients.
$\square$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by awesomemathlete, Dec 10, 2019, 1:25 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
yayups
1614 posts
#4 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
We claim the answer is $\boxed{2019^{-2019^{-1}}}$. The solution follows from the following two claims.

Claim: We always have $\mu\ge 2019^{-2019^{-1}}$.

Proof: By Vieta's formulas, we have \[z_1z_2\cdots z_{2019}=(-1)^{2019}\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}},\]so \[|z_1|\cdots|z_{2019}|=\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}\ge\frac{1}{2019}.\]Thus, by AM-GM, we have $\mu\ge\sqrt[2019]{\frac{1}{2019}}=2019^{-2019^{-1}}$. $\blacksquare$

Claim: There exists a polynomial $P$ satisfying the conditions of the problem such that $\mu=2019^{-2019^{-1}}$.

Proof: For convenience, denote $\ell:=2019^{2019^{-1}}$. We claim that \[P(z):=1+\ell z+\ell^2z^2+\cdots+\ell^{2019}z^{2019}\]works. First note that $b_i=\ell^i$, and since $\ell>1$, we have \[1=b_0<b_1<b_2<\cdots<b_{2019}=2019.\]Now, note that \[P(z)(\ell z-1)=(\ell z)^{2020}-1,\]so any root $z_i$ of $P$ satisfies $(\ell z_i)^{2020}=1$, so $|\ell z_i|=1$. Thus, $|z_i|=1/\ell$, so the average of the absolute value of the roots $\mu$ is just $1/\ell=2019^{-2019^{-1}}$, as desired.

Remark: It is straightforward to motivate this proof by looking the equality case of the previous claim.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by yayups, Dec 10, 2019, 5:12 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
panto
15 posts
#5 • 3 Y
Y by Mango247, Mango247, Mango247
To all solutions above,

How do we know that there is no better bound than $\frac{1}{2019}^{\frac{1}{2019}}$?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
john0512
4178 posts
#8
Y by
letsgo i solved a recent putnam #3

We claim that the answer is $2019^{-1/2019}$. Let $c=2019^{1/2019}$. This is achieved by the polynomial $$(cx)^{2019}+(cx)^{2018}\cdots +cx+1$$since its roots are the 2020th roots of unity other than 1 but divided by $c$.

Now, by AM-GM, we have $$\mu\geq \sqrt[2019]{|z_{0}z_{1}\cdots z_{2019}|}=\sqrt[2019]{|\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}|}\geq \sqrt[2019]{1/2019},$$so we are done.

remark: solution was motivated by playing around with only quadratics, first trying roots of unity but then seeing that i could divided that by sqrt2, and then the equality case of all roots of unity scaled by a constant motivated the amgm
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by john0512, Dec 14, 2022, 7:00 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mogmog8
1080 posts
#9 • 1 Y
Y by centslordm
We claim the answer is $M=\left(\frac{1}{2019}\right)^{\frac{1}{2019}}$ which is possible when \[P(z)=\sum_{k=0}^{2019}(M^{-1}z)^k\]which yields roots $M\exp(2\pi i k/2020)$ for $k=1,2,\dots,2019$. For the bound, by AM-GM and Vieta's we see \[\frac{|z_1|+\dots+|z_{2019}|}{2019}\ge\sqrt[2019]{|z_1\dots z_{2019}|}=\sqrt[2019]{\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}}\ge\sqrt[2019]{\frac{1}{2019}}\]as desired. $\square$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Mogmog8, Feb 24, 2023, 9:05 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
waffles_123
362 posts
#10
Y by
this problem is very nice and almost requires elegant solutions.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8857 posts
#11
Y by
Notice that $$\mu \leq \sqrt[2019]{|z_1z_2z_3\cdots z_{2019}|} = \sqrt[2019]{\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}} \leq \sqrt[2019]{\frac 1{2019}}.$$Equality occurs when we set all the $z_i$ to be the 2019th roots of unity scaled by $\sqrt[2019]{\frac 1{2019}}$, which yields $b_i$ that satisfy the condition.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pinkpig
3761 posts
#12
Y by
solution
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by pinkpig, Nov 14, 2023, 11:41 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
joshualiu315
2513 posts
#13
Y by
We have

\[\mu = \frac{|z_1|+\dots+|z_{2019}|}{2019} \ge \sqrt[2019]{|z_1z_2z_3\cdots z_{2019}|} = \sqrt[2019]{\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}} \ge \boxed{\sqrt[2019]{\frac 1{2019}}}.\]
Equality occurs when $|z_1|=|z_2| = \dots = |z_{2019}|$, which can be achieved with a scaled roots of unity formation.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
dolphinday
1319 posts
#14
Y by
By AM-GM we have
\[\frac{|z_1|+ \dotsb + |z_{2019}|}{2019} \geq \sqrt[2019]{|z_1| \cdot \dotsb \cdot |z_{2019}|}\]The RHS is equal to $|\sqrt[2019]{\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}}| = \sqrt[2019]{\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}} $ by Vieta's(because magnitudes are multiplicative).
$\newline$
Then, it follows that the minimum of $\mu$ is $\frac{1}{2019^{2019}} = M$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sanyalarnab
930 posts
#15
Y by
The construction was cute :love:
Clearly mean of finitely many values gets minimized when the values are equal. So $\mu \geq \left(\prod_1^{2019}|z_i|\right)^{1/2019} = \left(\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}\right)^{1/2019} \geq \left(\frac{1}{2019}\right)^{1/2019}=M$
For the equality case, we note that $|z_i|=M$ which motivates for the roots of $z^{2020}=M^{2020}$ except for the root $M$. The polynomial $P(z)=\sum_{i=0}^{2019}2019M^{2019-i}z^i$ suffices. Note that $b_0=1,b_{2019}=2019$ and $b_i$ is strictly increasing. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
chakrabortyahan
377 posts
#16
Y by
jaah etao e post kore dieche...tobuo ami korbo ...
This did not feel like an A3 though
The bound is trivial by AM-GM .
$\mu = \frac{\mid z_1\mid+ \mid z_2\mid +....+\mid z_{2019}\mid }{2019}\ge \mid z_1z_2...z_{2019}\mid ^{\frac{1}{2019}} = \Large\mid \frac{b_{2019}}{b_0}\Large\mid^{\frac{1}{2019}}\ge \left[\frac{1}{2019}\right]^{\frac{1}{2019}} = M$
Now for equality we have all $\mid z_i\mid$ s equal to $M$
now we first consider the equation $x^{2019}+x^{2018}+....+1 = 0 $ the roots of this equation are all with unit modulus and are 2020 th root of unity and no root is $1$. Now we take $y=Mx$ the equation is $(y/M)^{2019}+...+1 = 0 \\ 
\implies 2019 y^{2019}+2019My^{2018}+...M^{2019} = 0  
\\ \implies 2019 y^{2019}+2019My^{2018}+...+1 = 0.....(*)$
Now the roots of $(*)$ are all with modulus $M$
and note that $M\le 1 \implies M^k\le 1\implies 2019M^k\le 2019$ and $M\le 1 \implies M^{2019}\le M^k \,\forall \, k \le 2019 \\ \implies 1\le 2019M^k$
Hence all the coefficients of $(*)$ are between 1 and 2019 and the roots are with equal modulus $M$ . Thus we get such a polynomial where the equality holds.
$\blacksquare\smiley$
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by chakrabortyahan, May 1, 2024, 7:06 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
lifeismathematics
1188 posts
#17
Y by
Consider the roots of $P(z)$ to be $z_{1}, z_{2}, \cdots , z-{n}$.

$\frac{|z_{1}|+|z_{2}|+\cdots+|z_{n}|}{n} \geqslant \sqrt[n]{|z_1||z_2|\cdots \cdot |z_n|}$ , so we have $\mu \geqslant \sqrt[n]{\frac{b_0}{b_n}} \geqslant \frac{1}{\sqrt[n]{n}}$.

So the maxima such $M=\frac{1}{\sqrt[n]{n}}$. Now we present a construction for which it is indeed a working solution.

Consider $P(z):=nz^{n}+nMz^{n-1}+nM^{2}z^{n-2}+\cdots+nM^{n}$ , clearly $\mu=\frac{1}{\sqrt[n]{n}}$ , now we have $b_{k}=M^{n-k}$.

notice $b_{k+i}-b_{k}= n^{\frac{k}{n}}\cdot \left(n^{\frac{i}{n}}-1\right)$ , for each $i>k$ we have $b_{k+i}-b_{k}>0$ , and also $b_{0}=1$ , $b_{n}=n$ , hence $1 \geqslant b_{0}<b_{1}<b_{2} \cdots < b_{n} \leqslant n$. Now just plug $n=2019$, we are done. $\square$
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a