Stay ahead of learning milestones! Enroll in a class over the summer!

G
Topic
First Poster
Last Poster
k a April Highlights and 2025 AoPS Online Class Information
jlacosta   0
Apr 2, 2025
Spring is in full swing and summer is right around the corner, what are your plans? At AoPS Online our schedule has new classes starting now through July, so be sure to keep your skills sharp and be prepared for the Fall school year! Check out the schedule of upcoming classes below.

WOOT early bird pricing is in effect, don’t miss out! If you took MathWOOT Level 2 last year, no worries, it is all new problems this year! Our Worldwide Online Olympiad Training program is for high school level competitors. AoPS designed these courses to help our top students get the deep focus they need to succeed in their specific competition goals. Check out the details at this link for all our WOOT programs in math, computer science, chemistry, and physics.

Looking for summer camps in math and language arts? Be sure to check out the video-based summer camps offered at the Virtual Campus that are 2- to 4-weeks in duration. There are middle and high school competition math camps as well as Math Beasts camps that review key topics coupled with fun explorations covering areas such as graph theory (Math Beasts Camp 6), cryptography (Math Beasts Camp 7-8), and topology (Math Beasts Camp 8-9)!

Be sure to mark your calendars for the following events:
[list][*]April 3rd (Webinar), 4pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learning with AoPS: Perspectives from a Parent, Math Camp Instructor, and University Professor
[*]April 8th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MATHCOUNTS State Discussion
April 9th (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Learn about Video-based Summer Camps at the Virtual Campus
[*]April 10th (Math Jam), 4:30pm PT/7:30pm ET, 2025 MathILy and MathILy-Er Math Jam: Multibackwards Numbers
[*]April 22nd (Webinar), 4:00pm PT/7:00pm ET, Competitive Programming at AoPS (USACO).[/list]
Our full course list for upcoming classes is below:
All classes run 7:30pm-8:45pm ET/4:30pm - 5:45pm PT unless otherwise noted.

Introductory: Grades 5-10

Prealgebra 1 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 1
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 13 - Aug 26
Thursday, May 29 - Sep 11
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Monday, Jun 30 - Oct 20
Wednesday, Jul 16 - Oct 29

Prealgebra 2 Self-Paced

Prealgebra 2
Sunday, Apr 13 - Aug 10
Wednesday, May 7 - Aug 20
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 29 - Oct 26
Friday, Jul 25 - Nov 21

Introduction to Algebra A Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra A
Monday, Apr 7 - Jul 28
Sunday, May 11 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Wednesday, May 14 - Aug 27
Friday, May 30 - Sep 26
Monday, Jun 2 - Sep 22
Sunday, Jun 15 - Oct 12
Thursday, Jun 26 - Oct 9
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Oct 28

Introduction to Counting & Probability Self-Paced

Introduction to Counting & Probability
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Thursday, May 15 - Jul 31
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Wednesday, Jul 9 - Sep 24
Sunday, Jul 27 - Oct 19

Introduction to Number Theory
Thursday, Apr 17 - Jul 3
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Monday, Jun 9 - Aug 25
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Tuesday, Jul 15 - Sep 30

Introduction to Algebra B Self-Paced

Introduction to Algebra B
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 30
Tuesday, May 6 - Aug 19
Wednesday, Jun 4 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Oct 19
Friday, Jul 18 - Nov 14

Introduction to Geometry
Wednesday, Apr 23 - Oct 1
Sunday, May 11 - Nov 9
Tuesday, May 20 - Oct 28
Monday, Jun 16 - Dec 8
Friday, Jun 20 - Jan 9
Sunday, Jun 29 - Jan 11
Monday, Jul 14 - Jan 19

Intermediate: Grades 8-12

Intermediate Algebra
Monday, Apr 21 - Oct 13
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 23
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Nov 18
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 10
Sunday, Jul 13 - Jan 18
Thursday, Jul 24 - Jan 22

Intermediate Counting & Probability
Wednesday, May 21 - Sep 17
Sunday, Jun 22 - Nov 2

Intermediate Number Theory
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Wednesday, Jun 18 - Sep 3

Precalculus
Wednesday, Apr 9 - Sep 3
Friday, May 16 - Oct 24
Sunday, Jun 1 - Nov 9
Monday, Jun 30 - Dec 8

Advanced: Grades 9-12

Olympiad Geometry
Tuesday, Jun 10 - Aug 26

Calculus
Tuesday, May 27 - Nov 11
Wednesday, Jun 25 - Dec 17

Group Theory
Thursday, Jun 12 - Sep 11

Contest Preparation: Grades 6-12

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Basics
Wednesday, Apr 16 - Jul 2
Friday, May 23 - Aug 15
Monday, Jun 2 - Aug 18
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

MATHCOUNTS/AMC 8 Advanced
Friday, Apr 11 - Jun 27
Sunday, May 11 - Aug 10
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Problem Series
Friday, May 9 - Aug 1
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15
Tues & Thurs, Jul 8 - Aug 14 (meets twice a week!)

AMC 10 Final Fives
Sunday, May 11 - Jun 8
Tuesday, May 27 - Jun 17
Monday, Jun 30 - Jul 21

AMC 12 Problem Series
Tuesday, May 27 - Aug 12
Thursday, Jun 12 - Aug 28
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 21
Wednesday, Aug 6 - Oct 22

AMC 12 Final Fives
Sunday, May 18 - Jun 15

F=ma Problem Series
Wednesday, Jun 11 - Aug 27

WOOT Programs
Visit the pages linked for full schedule details for each of these programs!


MathWOOT Level 1
MathWOOT Level 2
ChemWOOT
CodeWOOT
PhysicsWOOT

Programming

Introduction to Programming with Python
Thursday, May 22 - Aug 7
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14 (1:00 - 2:30 pm ET/10:00 - 11:30 am PT)
Tuesday, Jun 17 - Sep 2
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

Intermediate Programming with Python
Sunday, Jun 1 - Aug 24
Monday, Jun 30 - Sep 22

USACO Bronze Problem Series
Tuesday, May 13 - Jul 29
Sunday, Jun 22 - Sep 1

Physics

Introduction to Physics
Wednesday, May 21 - Aug 6
Sunday, Jun 15 - Sep 14
Monday, Jun 23 - Sep 15

Physics 1: Mechanics
Thursday, May 22 - Oct 30
Monday, Jun 23 - Dec 15

Relativity
Sat & Sun, Apr 26 - Apr 27 (4:00 - 7:00 pm ET/1:00 - 4:00pm PT)
Mon, Tue, Wed & Thurs, Jun 23 - Jun 26 (meets every day of the week!)
0 replies
jlacosta
Apr 2, 2025
0 replies
k i Adding contests to the Contest Collections
dcouchman   1
N Apr 5, 2023 by v_Enhance
Want to help AoPS remain a valuable Olympiad resource? Help us add contests to AoPS's Contest Collections.

Find instructions and a list of contests to add here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c40244h1064480_contests_to_add
1 reply
dcouchman
Sep 9, 2019
v_Enhance
Apr 5, 2023
k i Zero tolerance
ZetaX   49
N May 4, 2019 by NoDealsHere
Source: Use your common sense! (enough is enough)
Some users don't want to learn, some other simply ignore advises.
But please follow the following guideline:


To make it short: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!
If you don't have common sense, don't post.


More specifically:

For new threads:


a) Good, meaningful title:
The title has to say what the problem is about in best way possible.
If that title occured already, it's definitely bad. And contest names aren't good either.
That's in fact a requirement for being able to search old problems.

Examples:
Bad titles:
- "Hard"/"Medium"/"Easy" (if you find it so cool how hard/easy it is, tell it in the post and use a title that tells us the problem)
- "Number Theory" (hey guy, guess why this forum's named that way¿ and is it the only such problem on earth¿)
- "Fibonacci" (there are millions of Fibonacci problems out there, all posted and named the same...)
- "Chinese TST 2003" (does this say anything about the problem¿)
Good titles:
- "On divisors of a³+2b³+4c³-6abc"
- "Number of solutions to x²+y²=6z²"
- "Fibonacci numbers are never squares"


b) Use search function:
Before posting a "new" problem spend at least two, better five, minutes to look if this problem was posted before. If it was, don't repost it. If you have anything important to say on topic, post it in one of the older threads.
If the thread is locked cause of this, use search function.

Update (by Amir Hossein). The best way to search for two keywords in AoPS is to input
[code]+"first keyword" +"second keyword"[/code]
so that any post containing both strings "first word" and "second form".


c) Good problem statement:
Some recent really bad post was:
[quote]$lim_{n\to 1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n}-lnn$[/quote]
It contains no question and no answer.
If you do this, too, you are on the best way to get your thread deleted. Write everything clearly, define where your variables come from (and define the "natural" numbers if used). Additionally read your post at least twice before submitting. After you sent it, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.


For answers to already existing threads:


d) Of any interest and with content:
Don't post things that are more trivial than completely obvious. For example, if the question is to solve $x^{3}+y^{3}=z^{3}$, do not answer with "$x=y=z=0$ is a solution" only. Either you post any kind of proof or at least something unexpected (like "$x=1337, y=481, z=42$ is the smallest solution). Someone that does not see that $x=y=z=0$ is a solution of the above without your post is completely wrong here, this is an IMO-level forum.
Similar, posting "I have solved this problem" but not posting anything else is not welcome; it even looks that you just want to show off what a genius you are.

e) Well written and checked answers:
Like c) for new threads, check your solutions at least twice for mistakes. And after sending, read it again and use the Edit-Button if necessary to correct errors.



To repeat it: ALWAYS USE YOUR COMMON SENSE IF POSTING!


Everything definitely out of range of common sense will be locked or deleted (exept for new users having less than about 42 posts, they are newbies and need/get some time to learn).

The above rules will be applied from next monday (5. march of 2007).
Feel free to discuss on this here.
49 replies
ZetaX
Feb 27, 2007
NoDealsHere
May 4, 2019
Two times derivable real function
Valentin Vornicu   12
N 13 minutes ago by Rohit-2006
Source: RMO 2008, 11th Grade, Problem 3
Let $ f: \mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ be a function, two times derivable on $ \mathbb R$ for which there exist $ c\in\mathbb R$ such that
\[ \frac { f(b)-f(a) }{b-a} \neq f'(c) ,\] for all $ a\neq b \in \mathbb R$.

Prove that $ f''(c)=0$.
12 replies
Valentin Vornicu
Apr 30, 2008
Rohit-2006
13 minutes ago
nice system of equations
outback   4
N 44 minutes ago by Raj_singh1432
Solve in positive numbers the system

$ x_1+\frac{1}{x_2}=4, x_2+\frac{1}{x_3}=1, x_3+\frac{1}{x_4}=4, ..., x_{99}+\frac{1}{x_{100}}=4, x_{100}+\frac{1}{x_1}=1$
4 replies
outback
Oct 8, 2008
Raj_singh1432
44 minutes ago
Putnam 1972 A2
sqrtX   2
N an hour ago by KAME06
Source: Putnam 1972
Let $S$ be a set with a binary operation $\ast$ such that
1) $a \ast(a\ast b)=b$ for all $a,b\in S$.
2) $(a\ast b)\ast b=a$ for all $a,b\in S$.
Show that $\ast$ is commutative and give an example where $\ast$ is not associative.
2 replies
sqrtX
Feb 17, 2022
KAME06
an hour ago
Two circles, a tangent line and a parallel
Valentin Vornicu   103
N an hour ago by zuat.e
Source: IMO 2000, Problem 1, IMO Shortlist 2000, G2
Two circles $ G_1$ and $ G_2$ intersect at two points $ M$ and $ N$. Let $ AB$ be the line tangent to these circles at $ A$ and $ B$, respectively, so that $ M$ lies closer to $ AB$ than $ N$. Let $ CD$ be the line parallel to $ AB$ and passing through the point $ M$, with $ C$ on $ G_1$ and $ D$ on $ G_2$. Lines $ AC$ and $ BD$ meet at $ E$; lines $ AN$ and $ CD$ meet at $ P$; lines $ BN$ and $ CD$ meet at $ Q$. Show that $ EP = EQ$.
103 replies
Valentin Vornicu
Oct 24, 2005
zuat.e
an hour ago
Inequalities
idomybest   3
N 2 hours ago by damyan
Source: The Interesting Around Technical Analysis Three Variable Inequalities
The problem is in the attachment below.
3 replies
idomybest
Oct 15, 2021
damyan
2 hours ago
Function on positive integers with two inputs
Assassino9931   2
N 2 hours ago by Assassino9931
Source: Bulgaria Winter Competition 2025 Problem 10.4
The function $f: \mathbb{Z}_{>0} \times \mathbb{Z}_{>0} \to \mathbb{Z}_{>0}$ is such that $f(a,b) + f(b,c) = f(ac, b^2) + 1$ for any positive integers $a,b,c$. Assume there exists a positive integer $n$ such that $f(n, m) \leq f(n, m + 1)$ for all positive integers $m$. Determine all possible values of $f(2025, 2025)$.
2 replies
Assassino9931
Jan 27, 2025
Assassino9931
2 hours ago
Normal but good inequality
giangtruong13   4
N 2 hours ago by IceyCold
Source: From a province
Let $a,b,c> 0$ satisfy that $a+b+c=3abc$. Prove that: $$\sum_{cyc} \frac{ab}{3c+ab+abc} \geq \frac{3}{5} $$
4 replies
giangtruong13
Mar 31, 2025
IceyCold
2 hours ago
Tiling rectangle with smaller rectangles.
MarkBcc168   61
N 2 hours ago by YaoAOPS
Source: IMO Shortlist 2017 C1
A rectangle $\mathcal{R}$ with odd integer side lengths is divided into small rectangles with integer side lengths. Prove that there is at least one among the small rectangles whose distances from the four sides of $\mathcal{R}$ are either all odd or all even.

Proposed by Jeck Lim, Singapore
61 replies
MarkBcc168
Jul 10, 2018
YaoAOPS
2 hours ago
A magician has one hundred cards numbered 1 to 100
Valentin Vornicu   49
N 2 hours ago by YaoAOPS
Source: IMO 2000, Problem 4, IMO Shortlist 2000, C1
A magician has one hundred cards numbered 1 to 100. He puts them into three boxes, a red one, a white one and a blue one, so that each box contains at least one card. A member of the audience draws two cards from two different boxes and announces the sum of numbers on those cards. Given this information, the magician locates the box from which no card has been drawn.

How many ways are there to put the cards in the three boxes so that the trick works?
49 replies
Valentin Vornicu
Oct 24, 2005
YaoAOPS
2 hours ago
Nice inequality
sqing   2
N 2 hours ago by Seungjun_Lee
Source: WYX
Let $a_1,a_2,\cdots,a_n  (n\ge 2)$ be real numbers . Prove that : There exist positive integer $k\in \{1,2,\cdots,n\}$ such that $$\sum_{i=1}^{n}\{kx_i\}(1-\{kx_i\})<\frac{n-1}{6}.$$Where $\{x\}=x-\left \lfloor x \right \rfloor.$
2 replies
sqing
Apr 24, 2019
Seungjun_Lee
2 hours ago
Concurrency
Dadgarnia   27
N 2 hours ago by zuat.e
Source: Iranian TST 2020, second exam day 2, problem 4
Let $ABC$ be an isosceles triangle ($AB=AC$) with incenter $I$. Circle $\omega$ passes through $C$ and $I$ and is tangent to $AI$. $\omega$ intersects $AC$ and circumcircle of $ABC$ at $Q$ and $D$, respectively. Let $M$ be the midpoint of $AB$ and $N$ be the midpoint of $CQ$. Prove that $AD$, $MN$ and $BC$ are concurrent.

Proposed by Alireza Dadgarnia
27 replies
Dadgarnia
Mar 12, 2020
zuat.e
2 hours ago
nice geo
Melid   1
N 3 hours ago by Melid
Source: 2025 Japan Junior MO preliminary P9
Let ABCD be a cyclic quadrilateral, which is AB=7 and BC=6. Let E be a point on segment CD so that BE=9. Line BE and AD intersect at F. Suppose that A, D, and F lie in order. If AF=11 and DF:DE=7:6, find the length of segment CD.
1 reply
Melid
3 hours ago
Melid
3 hours ago
Can a 0-1 matrix square to the matrix with all ones?
Tintarn   3
N Today at 9:30 AM by Kugelmonster
Source: IMC 2024, Problem 3
For which positive integers $n$ does there exist an $n \times n$ matrix $A$ whose entries are all in $\{0,1\}$, such that $A^2$ is the matrix of all ones?
3 replies
Tintarn
Aug 7, 2024
Kugelmonster
Today at 9:30 AM
Limit with sin^2x
Quantum_fluctuations   7
N Today at 7:25 AM by P162008

Evaluate:

$\lim_{x \to 0} \left( 1^{1/\sin^2 x} + 2^{1/\sin^2 x} + 3^{1/\sin^2 x} + .  .  . + n^{1/\sin^2 x} \right)^{\sin^2 x}$
7 replies
Quantum_fluctuations
Apr 26, 2020
P162008
Today at 7:25 AM
Putnam 2019 A3
djmathman   13
N May 8, 2024 by lifeismathematics
Given real numbers $b_0,b_1,\ldots, b_{2019}$ with $b_{2019}\neq 0$, let $z_1,z_2,\ldots, z_{2019}$ be the roots in the complex plane of the polynomial
\[
P(z) = \sum_{k=0}^{2019}b_kz^k.
\]Let $\mu = (|z_1|+ \cdots + |z_{2019}|)/2019$ be the average of the distances from $z_1,z_2,\ldots, z_{2019}$ to the origin.  Determine the largest constant $M$ such that $\mu\geq M$ for all choices of $b_0,b_1,\ldots, b_{2019}$ that satisfy
\[
1\leq b_0 < b_1 < b_2 < \cdots < b_{2019} \leq 2019.
\]
13 replies
djmathman
Dec 10, 2019
lifeismathematics
May 8, 2024
Putnam 2019 A3
G H J
G H BBookmark kLocked kLocked NReply
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
djmathman
7938 posts
#1 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Rounak_iitr
Given real numbers $b_0,b_1,\ldots, b_{2019}$ with $b_{2019}\neq 0$, let $z_1,z_2,\ldots, z_{2019}$ be the roots in the complex plane of the polynomial
\[
P(z) = \sum_{k=0}^{2019}b_kz^k.
\]Let $\mu = (|z_1|+ \cdots + |z_{2019}|)/2019$ be the average of the distances from $z_1,z_2,\ldots, z_{2019}$ to the origin.  Determine the largest constant $M$ such that $\mu\geq M$ for all choices of $b_0,b_1,\ldots, b_{2019}$ that satisfy
\[
1\leq b_0 < b_1 < b_2 < \cdots < b_{2019} \leq 2019.
\]
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by djmathman, Sep 14, 2020, 1:20 PM
Reason: Title
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
awesomemathlete
120 posts
#2 • 3 Y
Y by Rebel_1, Akaishuichi9598, Adventure10
By AM-GM we have that $\frac{|z_1|+|z_2|+\dots+|z_{2019}|}{2019}\ge(|z_1|\cdot|z_2|\cdots|z_{2019}|)^{\frac{1}{2019}}=\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}^{\frac{1}{2019}}\ge\boxed{\frac{1}{2019}^{\frac{1}{2019}}}=M$. Equality is achieved when all the roots have magnitude $M$. For example the $2020^{\text{th}}$ roots of unity excluding $1$ multiplied by $M$ are the roots of: $2019\cdot\frac{x^{2020}-M^{2020}}{x-M}=2019(x^{2019}+Mx^{2018}+\dots+M^{2019})$ which satisfies the desired constraints on the coefficients.
$\square$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by awesomemathlete, Dec 10, 2019, 1:25 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
yayups
1614 posts
#4 • 2 Y
Y by Adventure10, Mango247
We claim the answer is $\boxed{2019^{-2019^{-1}}}$. The solution follows from the following two claims.

Claim: We always have $\mu\ge 2019^{-2019^{-1}}$.

Proof: By Vieta's formulas, we have \[z_1z_2\cdots z_{2019}=(-1)^{2019}\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}},\]so \[|z_1|\cdots|z_{2019}|=\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}\ge\frac{1}{2019}.\]Thus, by AM-GM, we have $\mu\ge\sqrt[2019]{\frac{1}{2019}}=2019^{-2019^{-1}}$. $\blacksquare$

Claim: There exists a polynomial $P$ satisfying the conditions of the problem such that $\mu=2019^{-2019^{-1}}$.

Proof: For convenience, denote $\ell:=2019^{2019^{-1}}$. We claim that \[P(z):=1+\ell z+\ell^2z^2+\cdots+\ell^{2019}z^{2019}\]works. First note that $b_i=\ell^i$, and since $\ell>1$, we have \[1=b_0<b_1<b_2<\cdots<b_{2019}=2019.\]Now, note that \[P(z)(\ell z-1)=(\ell z)^{2020}-1,\]so any root $z_i$ of $P$ satisfies $(\ell z_i)^{2020}=1$, so $|\ell z_i|=1$. Thus, $|z_i|=1/\ell$, so the average of the absolute value of the roots $\mu$ is just $1/\ell=2019^{-2019^{-1}}$, as desired.

Remark: It is straightforward to motivate this proof by looking the equality case of the previous claim.
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by yayups, Dec 10, 2019, 5:12 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
panto
15 posts
#5 • 3 Y
Y by Mango247, Mango247, Mango247
To all solutions above,

How do we know that there is no better bound than $\frac{1}{2019}^{\frac{1}{2019}}$?
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
john0512
4184 posts
#8
Y by
letsgo i solved a recent putnam #3

We claim that the answer is $2019^{-1/2019}$. Let $c=2019^{1/2019}$. This is achieved by the polynomial $$(cx)^{2019}+(cx)^{2018}\cdots +cx+1$$since its roots are the 2020th roots of unity other than 1 but divided by $c$.

Now, by AM-GM, we have $$\mu\geq \sqrt[2019]{|z_{0}z_{1}\cdots z_{2019}|}=\sqrt[2019]{|\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}|}\geq \sqrt[2019]{1/2019},$$so we are done.

remark: solution was motivated by playing around with only quadratics, first trying roots of unity but then seeing that i could divided that by sqrt2, and then the equality case of all roots of unity scaled by a constant motivated the amgm
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by john0512, Dec 14, 2022, 7:00 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Mogmog8
1080 posts
#9 • 1 Y
Y by centslordm
We claim the answer is $M=\left(\frac{1}{2019}\right)^{\frac{1}{2019}}$ which is possible when \[P(z)=\sum_{k=0}^{2019}(M^{-1}z)^k\]which yields roots $M\exp(2\pi i k/2020)$ for $k=1,2,\dots,2019$. For the bound, by AM-GM and Vieta's we see \[\frac{|z_1|+\dots+|z_{2019}|}{2019}\ge\sqrt[2019]{|z_1\dots z_{2019}|}=\sqrt[2019]{\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}}\ge\sqrt[2019]{\frac{1}{2019}}\]as desired. $\square$
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by Mogmog8, Feb 24, 2023, 9:05 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
waffles_123
362 posts
#10
Y by
this problem is very nice and almost requires elegant solutions.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
HamstPan38825
8857 posts
#11
Y by
Notice that $$\mu \leq \sqrt[2019]{|z_1z_2z_3\cdots z_{2019}|} = \sqrt[2019]{\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}} \leq \sqrt[2019]{\frac 1{2019}}.$$Equality occurs when we set all the $z_i$ to be the 2019th roots of unity scaled by $\sqrt[2019]{\frac 1{2019}}$, which yields $b_i$ that satisfy the condition.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
pinkpig
3761 posts
#12
Y by
solution
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by pinkpig, Nov 14, 2023, 11:41 PM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
joshualiu315
2513 posts
#13
Y by
We have

\[\mu = \frac{|z_1|+\dots+|z_{2019}|}{2019} \ge \sqrt[2019]{|z_1z_2z_3\cdots z_{2019}|} = \sqrt[2019]{\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}} \ge \boxed{\sqrt[2019]{\frac 1{2019}}}.\]
Equality occurs when $|z_1|=|z_2| = \dots = |z_{2019}|$, which can be achieved with a scaled roots of unity formation.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
dolphinday
1324 posts
#14
Y by
By AM-GM we have
\[\frac{|z_1|+ \dotsb + |z_{2019}|}{2019} \geq \sqrt[2019]{|z_1| \cdot \dotsb \cdot |z_{2019}|}\]The RHS is equal to $|\sqrt[2019]{\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}}| = \sqrt[2019]{\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}} $ by Vieta's(because magnitudes are multiplicative).
$\newline$
Then, it follows that the minimum of $\mu$ is $\frac{1}{2019^{2019}} = M$.
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
sanyalarnab
930 posts
#15
Y by
The construction was cute :love:
Clearly mean of finitely many values gets minimized when the values are equal. So $\mu \geq \left(\prod_1^{2019}|z_i|\right)^{1/2019} = \left(\frac{b_0}{b_{2019}}\right)^{1/2019} \geq \left(\frac{1}{2019}\right)^{1/2019}=M$
For the equality case, we note that $|z_i|=M$ which motivates for the roots of $z^{2020}=M^{2020}$ except for the root $M$. The polynomial $P(z)=\sum_{i=0}^{2019}2019M^{2019-i}z^i$ suffices. Note that $b_0=1,b_{2019}=2019$ and $b_i$ is strictly increasing. $\blacksquare$
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
chakrabortyahan
380 posts
#16
Y by
jaah etao e post kore dieche...tobuo ami korbo ...
This did not feel like an A3 though
The bound is trivial by AM-GM .
$\mu = \frac{\mid z_1\mid+ \mid z_2\mid +....+\mid z_{2019}\mid }{2019}\ge \mid z_1z_2...z_{2019}\mid ^{\frac{1}{2019}} = \Large\mid \frac{b_{2019}}{b_0}\Large\mid^{\frac{1}{2019}}\ge \left[\frac{1}{2019}\right]^{\frac{1}{2019}} = M$
Now for equality we have all $\mid z_i\mid$ s equal to $M$
now we first consider the equation $x^{2019}+x^{2018}+....+1 = 0 $ the roots of this equation are all with unit modulus and are 2020 th root of unity and no root is $1$. Now we take $y=Mx$ the equation is $(y/M)^{2019}+...+1 = 0 \\ 
\implies 2019 y^{2019}+2019My^{2018}+...M^{2019} = 0  
\\ \implies 2019 y^{2019}+2019My^{2018}+...+1 = 0.....(*)$
Now the roots of $(*)$ are all with modulus $M$
and note that $M\le 1 \implies M^k\le 1\implies 2019M^k\le 2019$ and $M\le 1 \implies M^{2019}\le M^k \,\forall \, k \le 2019 \\ \implies 1\le 2019M^k$
Hence all the coefficients of $(*)$ are between 1 and 2019 and the roots are with equal modulus $M$ . Thus we get such a polynomial where the equality holds.
$\blacksquare\smiley$
This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by chakrabortyahan, May 1, 2024, 7:06 AM
Z K Y
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
lifeismathematics
1188 posts
#17
Y by
Consider the roots of $P(z)$ to be $z_{1}, z_{2}, \cdots , z-{n}$.

$\frac{|z_{1}|+|z_{2}|+\cdots+|z_{n}|}{n} \geqslant \sqrt[n]{|z_1||z_2|\cdots \cdot |z_n|}$ , so we have $\mu \geqslant \sqrt[n]{\frac{b_0}{b_n}} \geqslant \frac{1}{\sqrt[n]{n}}$.

So the maxima such $M=\frac{1}{\sqrt[n]{n}}$. Now we present a construction for which it is indeed a working solution.

Consider $P(z):=nz^{n}+nMz^{n-1}+nM^{2}z^{n-2}+\cdots+nM^{n}$ , clearly $\mu=\frac{1}{\sqrt[n]{n}}$ , now we have $b_{k}=M^{n-k}$.

notice $b_{k+i}-b_{k}= n^{\frac{k}{n}}\cdot \left(n^{\frac{i}{n}}-1\right)$ , for each $i>k$ we have $b_{k+i}-b_{k}>0$ , and also $b_{0}=1$ , $b_{n}=n$ , hence $1 \geqslant b_{0}<b_{1}<b_{2} \cdots < b_{n} \leqslant n$. Now just plug $n=2019$, we are done. $\square$
Z K Y
N Quick Reply
G
H
=
a