more bad latex
by EpicSkills32, Mar 15, 2013, 4:43 AM
Here we would like to solve the following equation for 

- We can change
into 

- We can get a common denominator of
and factor it out.

-From here we change the $\2cos^2 \theta $ into
using our useful Pythagorean identity. Also, we move it to switch places with the
in the same step.

-Simplifying within parentheses gives :

-Now we have an expression that's factorable. So we factor it!

-We now have three factors that we can set equal to zero.
Solving gives
. Between 0 and 360 degrees, 90 and 270 are the only ones that work.
Solving gives
. Between 0 and 360 degrees, 210 and 330 are the solutions.
Solving gives
. Obviously, there are no real solutions for
in this case.
However, we have to double-check our solutions
degrees. We have to check because when we got a common denominator of
, we introduced a variable.
Substituting our solutions into the original equations results in this [used radians because don't know how to do degree symbol] :

That obviously didn't work.
Since I have to go soon, we also know then from that^^ that 180 [pi radians] does not work either.
So our final solutions are
and
[degrees].


- We can change



- We can get a common denominator of



-From here we change the $\2cos^2 \theta $ into






-Simplifying within parentheses gives :


-Now we have an expression that's factorable. So we factor it!


-We now have three factors that we can set equal to zero.







However, we have to double-check our solutions


Substituting our solutions into the original equations results in this [used radians because don't know how to do degree symbol] :


That obviously didn't work.
Since I have to go soon, we also know then from that^^ that 180 [pi radians] does not work either.
So our final solutions are

