Z[√6]
by math_explorer, Feb 24, 2013, 1:55 AM
It's "obviously" not a unique factorization domain...

but



and

so this obvious argument is wrong.
(
and
are inverses)
Note that the argument does work for
. The typical multiplicative norm
is useful.
has typical multiplicative norm
, hence if it were reducible its factors would have norm
which is impossible by taking mod 5; but it's not prime since
but
.
More generally: if
is square-free and
has two prime factors
where
and
is not a quadratic residue
, then
is not a UFD because
is irreducible but not prime.
(Note that we need
because of the absolute value in the norm; we need both
and
to be nonresidues.)
Somewhat amazingly,
is actually Euclidean with the typical norm.
--- start proof ---
Use the typical method: treat it as a subring of
(which is a field by rationalizing the denominator), where the typical norm
is still multiplicative. Given
, we want
where
and
.
Dividing (in
), this is equivalent to
, and we want
. Let
; we want
so that
(obviously,
is automatically of the form
.)
Express
as
and consider the closest integers to
and
; let the respective differences between
and their closest integers be
, so
. We see that by picking components for
we can get any value for
like
for
.
Now, casework!
and
.
If
we're done because
.
If
then note that
and we're done because
.
If
then note that
and we're done because
.
You may have noted that
slipped between the last two cases. This hole can be plugged (
, which works wich the range of
) but we don't need to because
.
Combining the above,
is Euclidean (hence a principal ideal domain, hence a unique factorization domain.)
--- QED ---
According to OEIS, all of these quadratic integer rings that are Euclidean with the typical norm are known. (It says
instead of
, but according to Wikipedia this is a standard abuse of terminology:)
However, the ring of integers of
is not
when
. Actually, 2 is irreducible but not prime in
if
.

but



and


so this obvious argument is wrong.
(


Note that the argument does work for
![$\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{10}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/0/0/f001c82084ee54d19283857fa5864a716a4712cb.png)






More generally: if






![$\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{D}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/9/8/79847b6f2a01bfcaa8c156536c83cbf062cf9f2e.png)

(Note that we need



Somewhat amazingly,
![$\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{6}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/3/3/63344fc783860c4d758101e589493b202adae899.png)
--- start proof ---
Use the typical method: treat it as a subring of
![$\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{6}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/4/3/24389b0e01e8e45f67d9a2105a889f45dafb2d69.png)

![$a, b \in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{6}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/5/0f51df654e84084bb13dc57d845217878398b069.png)
![$q, r \in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{6}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/b/d/2bd2f553a345c27b476ac56ea7df31136fcfc398.png)


Dividing (in
![$\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{6}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/4/3/24389b0e01e8e45f67d9a2105a889f45dafb2d69.png)


![$s = \frac{a}{b} \in \mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{6}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/f/e/2fe0bb657058a7c8f95e8cebdc59f0e26529461d.png)
![$q \in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{6}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/d/2/5d21051fc36e2df7d367ec8e06bf6052a4f57294.png)



Express











Now, casework!


If


If



If



You may have noted that



![$v = \sqrt{\frac{5}{24}} \not\in \mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{6}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/8/e/68e86266f753cf99fcde50d55ed4b08f6940024e.png)
Combining the above,
![$\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{6}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/3/3/63344fc783860c4d758101e589493b202adae899.png)
--- QED ---
According to OEIS, all of these quadratic integer rings that are Euclidean with the typical norm are known. (It says
![$\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{D}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/0/8/d081c1e7feee7c1cd6334d52bfaf2bb682e335aa.png)
![$\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{D}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/9/8/79847b6f2a01bfcaa8c156536c83cbf062cf9f2e.png)
Quote:
If this norm satisfies the axioms of a Euclidean function then the number field K is called norm-Euclidean. Strictly speaking it is the ring of integers that is Euclidean since fields are trivially Euclidean domains, but the terminology is standard.
However, the ring of integers of
![$\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{D}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/0/8/d081c1e7feee7c1cd6334d52bfaf2bb682e335aa.png)
![$\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{D}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/9/8/79847b6f2a01bfcaa8c156536c83cbf062cf9f2e.png)

![$\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{D}]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/9/8/79847b6f2a01bfcaa8c156536c83cbf062cf9f2e.png)

This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by math_explorer, Feb 24, 2013, 8:59 AM