Quadratic Gauss sums, part 1 of whatever
by math_explorer, Apr 19, 2016, 10:52 PM
Let
be a prime and let
be a primitive
th root of unity. Then automorphisms of
are determined by what
maps to, some other power of
, so the automorphism group is
. If
is a primitive root mod
, the automorphism group is generated by
. Composing this with itself yields functions like
.
Also, the automorphism group has a subgroup of index 2, which corresponds to an extension field of
of degree 2. What elements are in the subgroup? They are things of the form
for some
, so things where the exponent is a square.
Hey, cool! Quadratic residues!
I don't actually understand/remember Galois theory as well as I probably sound like I do, but whatever. Anyway, this motivates us to consider the sum
where the fraction is the Legendre symbol. It's fixed by a lot of automorphisms.
A final observation, much simpler than all the complicated stuff up there, is that if
and
ranges over
, then
also ranges over
. You may have seen this technique in a proof of Fermat's little theorem.
because the list of multiplicands on both sides are permutations of each other mod
; then divide out
.
Anyway, the
-to-the-power-of does the modding by
for us, so we let
and get
For fixed
such that
, the innermost exponent ranges over
. Then the inner sum is
, since it sums those powers of
.
On the other hand, when
, the innermost
is just 1, so the sum is just
. So if we separate the
from the
to take neat advantage of the fact that there are equally many quadratic residues as quadratic nonresidues, we get:

It's a Hard Problem to figure out the sign of
. More simply, there's something cool you can do to this to get quadratic reciprocity or something, but even this is already too hard. See you next time.



![$\mathbb{Q}[\zeta]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/c/d/2cd2bc001106881fb3e7abcd07a2e6b17c3e43ad.png)







Also, the automorphism group has a subgroup of index 2, which corresponds to an extension field of



Hey, cool! Quadratic residues!
I don't actually understand/remember Galois theory as well as I probably sound like I do, but whatever. Anyway, this motivates us to consider the sum
![\[ S = \sum_{k = 1}^{p-1} \left(\frac{k}{p}\right) \zeta^k \]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/f/c/ffc59a6b71bfafb607a90c21e0372954d4fddbe4.png)
A final observation, much simpler than all the complicated stuff up there, is that if





![\[ (1)(2)\cdots(p-1) \equiv (a)(2a)\cdots((p-1)a) \bmod{p} \]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/5/5/955027dc05398694d3baab6ab6dd81b97e5de231.png)


Anyway, the









On the other hand, when






It's a Hard Problem to figure out the sign of
