Geo 3 Prep
by djmathman, May 24, 2017, 3:14 AM
My Olympiad Geo skills are rustier than iron, holy heck
Solution
Solution
Remark
Solution
APMO 2017 #2 wrote:
Let
be a triangle with
. Let
be the intersection point of the internal bisector of angle
and the circumcircle of
. Let
be the intersection point of the perpendicular bisector of
with the external bisector of angle
. Prove that the midpoint of the segment
lies on the circumcircle of triangle
.










Solution
Let
,
, and
be the midpoints of
,
, and
respectively, noting that
. Remark that
, so
Furthermore,
Hence
, so by spiral similarity
Combining this with
establishes the desired cyclicity.
![[asy]
size(250);
defaultpen(linewidth(0.8));
pair A = dir(120), B = dir(215), C = dir(325), D = dir(270), M = (A+B)/2, N = (A+C)/2, E = (B+C)/2, P = dir(90), Z = extension(A,P,origin,N);
draw(A--B--C--A--Z--C^^Z--N^^B--D--C^^unitcircle);
draw(circumcircle(D,A,Z),linetype("4 4"));
draw(D--M--E--cycle,linetype("8 8"));
label("$A$",A,dir(origin--A));
label("$B$",B,dir(origin--B));
label("$C$",C,dir(origin--C));
label("$D$",D,dir(origin--D));
dot(M^^N^^E);
label("$M$",M,dir(origin--M));
label("$Z$",Z,dir(N--Z));
label("$E$",E,NE);
label("$N$",N,dir(Z--N));
draw(rightanglemark(Z,N,C,3)^^rightanglemark(D,E,C,3));
[/asy]](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/d/f/ddf843b3473946918faa725a01fa3337c7a9b515.png)








![\[\dfrac{DE}{EM}=\dfrac{DE}{CN}=\dfrac{DC}{CZ}.\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/8/5/f85d3974e4fbcdb12175baa12ca8de2111157ddb.png)
![\[\angle DEM=90^\circ+\angle MEB = 90^\circ + \angle ACB = (\angle ZCN+\angle DCE)+\angle ACB=\angle ZCD.\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/0/8/f084653f76a3424f960476b3c58ccd5747ef05db.png)

![\[\triangle DEC\sim\triangle DMZ\quad\implies\quad \angle DMZ=\angle DEC = 90^\circ.\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/2/7/027818d0f6ff208fb7d397c9c6f4f05ae7d28c06.png)

![[asy]
size(250);
defaultpen(linewidth(0.8));
pair A = dir(120), B = dir(215), C = dir(325), D = dir(270), M = (A+B)/2, N = (A+C)/2, E = (B+C)/2, P = dir(90), Z = extension(A,P,origin,N);
draw(A--B--C--A--Z--C^^Z--N^^B--D--C^^unitcircle);
draw(circumcircle(D,A,Z),linetype("4 4"));
draw(D--M--E--cycle,linetype("8 8"));
label("$A$",A,dir(origin--A));
label("$B$",B,dir(origin--B));
label("$C$",C,dir(origin--C));
label("$D$",D,dir(origin--D));
dot(M^^N^^E);
label("$M$",M,dir(origin--M));
label("$Z$",Z,dir(N--Z));
label("$E$",E,NE);
label("$N$",N,dir(Z--N));
draw(rightanglemark(Z,N,C,3)^^rightanglemark(D,E,C,3));
[/asy]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/d/f/ddf843b3473946918faa725a01fa3337c7a9b515.png)
Geo 3 Cornell 2013 Test 1 #4 wrote:
On the circumcircle
of triangle
, two points
,
are situated.
and
intersect
at
and
, respectively. Let
,
be the reflections of
,
across the perpendicular bisector of
. Prove that
,
intersect on
.

















Solution
If
and
are isogonal, with respect to
, then in fact
and
, so
and the problem is trivial. Now assume
and
are not isogonal. Let
with
(which we know exists since these two circles are not homothetic). I claim that
is the concurrence point in question.
We use directed angles modulo
throughout this proof. Note that since
and
are reflections across the perpendicular bisector of
, and since
,
as well, with
and
isogonal with respect to
. This means that
and
. Thus
, which means that
Similarly,
and
are isogonal and
. Thus, a
inversion
centered at
sends
and
, and so
. Thus, since
is the intersection of
and
, we have that
is mapped under
to
.
Thus, showing
,
,
collinear is equivalent to showing that
,
,
, and
are concyclic. But this is easy, as
where here arc measures are also directed. Similarly,
,
, and
are collinear, and so
. 











We use directed angles modulo












![\[\dfrac{AX}{AC} = \dfrac{AB}{AD'} \quad\implies\quad AX\cdot AD' = AB\cdot AC.\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/0/e/e0e8d9e761a1dd9fd22c03eb9010965c2c807204.png)















Thus, showing







![\[\measuredangle AYT' \equiv\measuredangle AYB = \dfrac{\widehat{AB} + \widehat{EC}}2 = \dfrac{\widehat{AB}+\widehat{BE'}}2 = \measuredangle AD'E'\equiv \measuredangle AD'T',\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/f/9/df9dc1bf9a7907165357692df7dfa147b531073c.png)





Remark
I'm aware of the one-line Pascal solution, but I couldn't think of that so yay! I think I originally thought Pascal might work, but then I figured out the intersection point was probably
and immediately got distracted with the spiral similarity configuration that emerged.

Romania TST 2007, Cosmin Pohoata wrote:
Let
be a triangle, let
be the tangency points of the incircle
to the sides
, respectively
, and let
be the midpoint of the side
. Let
, let
be the circle of diameter
, and let
be the other (than
) intersection points of
, respectively
, with
. Prove that
![\[ \frac {NX} {NY} = \frac {AC} {AB}.
\]](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/6/5/665ac88bcf46454f6920a95e959d73e1ac3a9705.png)















![\[ \frac {NX} {NY} = \frac {AC} {AB}.
\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/6/5/665ac88bcf46454f6920a95e959d73e1ac3a9705.png)
Solution
So it looks like this problem is configuration heaven
We first proceed with two lemmas.
LEMMA 1:
,
,
, and
are collinear. (This is Sharygin 2009.)
Proof. Note that
and
, so
,
,
,
are concyclic. Thus
whence
,
,
are collinear. Similarly,
,
,
are collinear. Yay. 
LEMMA 2:
,
, and
are collinear.
Proof. For some reason, I've never proven this before, so what follows is a suboptimal proof. Let
. Note that by the Ratio Lemma,
and
Combining this with
yields that
,
, and
are collinear. 
Note that since
,
,
, and
are concyclic,
. Thus
and
are isogonal with respect to either triangle (so that e.g. if
is placed on
such that
, then
and
would be isogonal), and so Steiner guarantees that
Thus ![\[\dfrac{NX}{NY} = \dfrac{DB}{DC}\left(\dfrac{IC}{IB}\right)^2 = \dfrac{DB}{DC}\cdot\dfrac{\sin^2\frac B2}{\sin^2\frac C2} = \dfrac{DE\sin\frac C2}{DF\sin\frac B2} = \dfrac{AC}{AB}.\]](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/a/5/3a53d2d3f23e6ca541fa7a0dfb9d1ce7ffcc1f46.png)
Someone please tell me there's a better way to do the ending
We first proceed with two lemmas.
LEMMA 1:




Proof. Note that






![\[\angle XEC = \angle XIC = 90^\circ - \frac {\angle A}2 = 180^\circ - \angle FEC,\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/0/e/c0ef1fb2dd3da0b15868b3efc9dbd0a0df4b5a84.png)







LEMMA 2:



Proof. For some reason, I've never proven this before, so what follows is a suboptimal proof. Let

![\[\dfrac{N'E}{N'F} = \dfrac{AE\sin\angle N'AE}{AF\sin\angle N'AF} = \dfrac{\sin\angle N'AE}{\sin\angle N'AF}\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/9/b/39b2d927b020ea622316ca4b0bd8e20f8bc3e587.png)
![\[\dfrac{N'E}{N'F} = \dfrac{DE\sin\frac C2}{DF\sin\frac B2} = \dfrac{2r\cos\frac C2\sin\frac C2}{2r\cos\frac B2\sin\frac B2} = \dfrac{\sin C}{\sin B} = \dfrac{\sin\angle MAC}{\sin\angle MAB}.\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/5/2/552b51d98e0938673afb189899b09a2f113fcbff.png)





Note that since












![\[\dfrac{NX}{NY}\cdot\dfrac{CD}{DB} = \left(\dfrac{IC}{IB}\right)^2.\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/2/2/b229e93e701f238c57eba253c35f99d8b4aa60d6.png)
![\[\dfrac{NX}{NY} = \dfrac{DB}{DC}\left(\dfrac{IC}{IB}\right)^2 = \dfrac{DB}{DC}\cdot\dfrac{\sin^2\frac B2}{\sin^2\frac C2} = \dfrac{DE\sin\frac C2}{DF\sin\frac B2} = \dfrac{AC}{AB}.\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/a/5/3a53d2d3f23e6ca541fa7a0dfb9d1ce7ffcc1f46.png)
Someone please tell me there's a better way to do the ending
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by djmathman, May 24, 2017, 3:15 AM