A Short Existence Proof of the Polar
by djmathman, Jul 14, 2022, 10:05 PM
I derived this proof last year while teaching Geo 4 at AwesomeMath and realized it wasn't posted anywhere. I figured this should be public somewhere.
Before proceeding with the proof, we will need a fact that is interesting in its own right. I'm not sure how well-known this is, but it was certainly surprising to me when I learned it last year.
Lemma. Let
be a circle, and let
be a line passing through its center
. For each point
, let
be the image of
under inversion about
. Then
is a projective map. In other words, for any points
,
,
, and
on
,
(Note that
denotes the cross ratio. Ever since I first taught Geo 4, I write the cross ratio without commas. Oops.)
Proof. Relabel
as
for ease of notation. It suffices to show that negative inversions are projective maps, since the difference between these two types of inversions is merely a reflection.
![[asy]
size(230);
defaultpen(linewidth(0.6)+fontsize(11));
pair P = (-0.6,0), Pp = (1/0.6,0), O = origin, Q = (0,1);
draw(unitcircle,red);
label("$\omega$",dir(110),dir(110),red);
draw((-1.2,0)--(2,0),blue);
label("$\ell$",(1.9,0),N,blue);
draw(P--Q--Pp^^rightanglemark(P,Q,Pp,3)^^O--Q^^rightanglemark(Q,O,Pp,3),gray);
dot("$P$",P,S,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$P'$",Pp,S,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$O$",O,S,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$Q$",Q,N);
[/asy]](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/7/a/97a3cdcea74c06161aa3a90d9dc7ba6ae59fa25f.png)
Let
be the radius of
, and let
be a fixed point on
such that
. Note that
, so
. This means the map
may be written as the composition of three maps
(In particular, the second map is a
rotation in the pencil of lines through
.) Each of these maps is projective, so
is, too.
.
We are now ready to move to our main result. Let
be a circle and
be any point. A variable line
through
intersects
at two points
and
. Let
be the unique point on
for which
.
Theorem (Existence of Polar). As
varies, point
lies on a fixed line
. This line is called the polar of
with respect to
.
![[asy]
size(230);
defaultpen(linewidth(0.6)+fontsize(11));
real r = 0.35;
pair A = dir(140), B = dir(20), P = r*A + (1-r)*B, Q = 1/(1-r)*B-r/(1-r)*A, O = P/2, R = foot(Q,O,P), S = 1.3*R-0.3*Q, T = 1.1*Q-0.1*R;
draw(unitcircle,red);
draw(A--Q,blue);
draw(S--T,gray);
draw(circle(O,abs(O)),gray+linetype("3 3"));
dot("$A$",A,NW,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$B$",B,NE,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$P$",P,S,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$Q$",Q,NE,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$O$",origin,S,linewidth(3.3));
label("$\omega$",dir(100),dir(100),red);
label("$\ell$",(B+Q)/2,S,blue);
label("$p$",(Q+R)/2,NE,gray);
dot("$Q'$",(A+B)/2,NE,linewidth(3.3));
[/asy]](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/5/8/e5862599a134b7c86d9ea8d0cd4a19844d4a4e87.png)
Proof. Consider the inversion
centered at
with power
. (Note that
has negative power if
lies inside the circle, as is the case in the diagram above.) Let
be the image of
with respect to
. Observe that
swaps
and
and sends
to the infinity point
in the direction of
. Thus, since inversion is a projective map,
It follows that
is the midpoint of
. That is,
.
it follows that, as the line
varies, point
moves along the circle with diameter
. Inverting back gives that
lies on a line, as desired. 
Before proceeding with the proof, we will need a fact that is interesting in its own right. I'm not sure how well-known this is, but it was certainly surprising to me when I learned it last year.
Lemma. Let













![\[
(ABCD) = (f(A)f(B)f(C)f(D)).
\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/9/d/69dd6249418be48e72e5666a5538020071d6ec4f.png)

Proof. Relabel


![[asy]
size(230);
defaultpen(linewidth(0.6)+fontsize(11));
pair P = (-0.6,0), Pp = (1/0.6,0), O = origin, Q = (0,1);
draw(unitcircle,red);
label("$\omega$",dir(110),dir(110),red);
draw((-1.2,0)--(2,0),blue);
label("$\ell$",(1.9,0),N,blue);
draw(P--Q--Pp^^rightanglemark(P,Q,Pp,3)^^O--Q^^rightanglemark(Q,O,Pp,3),gray);
dot("$P$",P,S,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$P'$",Pp,S,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$O$",O,S,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$Q$",Q,N);
[/asy]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/7/a/97a3cdcea74c06161aa3a90d9dc7ba6ae59fa25f.png)
Let








![\[
P \mapsto QP \mapsto QP' \mapsto P'.
\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/c/4/5c4637e86e664d66df38ab2eb21c96bcdba970cf.png)




We are now ready to move to our main result. Let










Theorem (Existence of Polar). As





![[asy]
size(230);
defaultpen(linewidth(0.6)+fontsize(11));
real r = 0.35;
pair A = dir(140), B = dir(20), P = r*A + (1-r)*B, Q = 1/(1-r)*B-r/(1-r)*A, O = P/2, R = foot(Q,O,P), S = 1.3*R-0.3*Q, T = 1.1*Q-0.1*R;
draw(unitcircle,red);
draw(A--Q,blue);
draw(S--T,gray);
draw(circle(O,abs(O)),gray+linetype("3 3"));
dot("$A$",A,NW,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$B$",B,NE,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$P$",P,S,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$Q$",Q,NE,linewidth(3.3));
dot("$O$",origin,S,linewidth(3.3));
label("$\omega$",dir(100),dir(100),red);
label("$\ell$",(B+Q)/2,S,blue);
label("$p$",(Q+R)/2,NE,gray);
dot("$Q'$",(A+B)/2,NE,linewidth(3.3));
[/asy]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/5/8/e5862599a134b7c86d9ea8d0cd4a19844d4a4e87.png)
Proof. Consider the inversion














![\[
-1 = (ABPQ) \stackrel{\Phi}= (BA\infty_\ell Q') = \frac{\overrightarrow{BQ'}}{\overrightarrow{AQ'}}.
\]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/a/7/4a7342364f6cd8bcd3fd6b8634df6ea3c66835ed.png)



it follows that, as the line




