End of meritocracy in education?

by rrusczyk, Sep 23, 2006, 4:34 PM

I've seen a lot of press over the last 6-12 months about the end of meritocracy in education. The main piece of evidence I see rolled out over and over is that the percentage of successful applicants to top college who are from wealthy families is increasing. From this, we are to deduce, college acceptance is becoming less meritocratic.

I don't buy it. College admission was a decidedly a rich person's game until about 50-60 years ago, when World War II and the GI Bill gave the middle and middle-lower classes access to higher education. Then, with the playing field somewhat more leveled (particularly as country-club schools had to admit more of these outstanding students, often the children of immigrants, in order to retain their status as top-notch schools), we saw a significant increase in lower-income people going to top schools.

But then what happens after a couple generations of fairer admissions? The highly-able lower-income families become higher income families. And highly-able families are more likely to prodcue highly-able kids. I'm not saying there are no smart poor kids; I'm just saying the percentage of smart kids who are wealthy is higher than it was 60 years ago, and this is much of the cause of the admissions change the press is lamenting. Along with the leveling effect of the GI Bill has been a large pool of intelligent (and ultimately, wealthy) immigrants from eastern Europe and Asia who value education.

So, I think this is another case of the press mis-attributing an effect to a cause they so dearly want to publicize. 'Big colleges holding back poor people' sells a lot more newspapers than 'GI Bill a success - the smart people are pulling ahead.' (Although I have seen a few dangerous whispers of the latter, with the conclusion that smart people pulling ahead is something that must be stopped.)

Comment

2 Comments

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
There is also a discussion regarding tuition fees related matters. Up to now the majority of the German universities are regulated by the state.

No tuition fees: That is fair for poor students who want to yield a degree at university. But the point that all tax payers are contributing to the money paid by the state to the universities. But only few lower income families enter universities as Richard said. As once they get into university they often get a good job and they do not belong to the poor families for no longer. But in general not having tuition fee may encourage more high-school students to start studying and thus contributing to skill level of their country, especially as most of the jobs are "high-level"-skill-based. Loads of students in US do not issue a master because they are afraid of getter deeper into dept. Though most universities offer statistics to students where their typical graduates end up and thus it turns out to be worth investing into your education.

Tuitions fees: Arguments can be reversed. Only those people who study should pay fees because only they will benefit later. Why should low income family pay universities with their taxes though they will never attend them? That is because some smart people establish a start-up and they need some "average" people to do administration stuff for example. But as more work is done by computers and robots that argument does not always work.

There might be some poor students not being able to attend but you cannot optimize all parameters or you introduce a huge scholarship system as partially available in US. It seems US top-notch universities have a mix of students where some of them seem to pay loads of tuition fees whereas other contribute to the research reputation of the university. Though it should be noted that quite often tuition fees only contribute a minor part to the university budget.

by orl, Sep 24, 2006, 1:22 AM

The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
It should be noted in the discussion of tuition that the US has more top universities than any other country in the world, and that a great many people who have researched this issue suggest that the tuition system is a big part of the reason this is true. (Compare that with the high school and middle school systems, in which it is not clear, and probably not even true, that the US is the best in the world - most middle and high schools in the US are public, i.e., supported by taxpayers.)

by rrusczyk, Sep 24, 2006, 1:37 PM

Come Search With Me

avatar

rrusczyk
Archives
+ December 2011
+ September 2011
+ August 2011
+ March 2011
+ June 2006
AMC
Tags
About Owner
  • Posts: 16194
  • Joined: Mar 28, 2003
Blog Stats
  • Blog created: Jan 28, 2005
  • Total entries: 940
  • Total visits: 3309315
  • Total comments: 3879
Search Blog
a