8 Comments
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
by
xpmath, Oct 29, 2008, 7:45 PM
- Report
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
OMG, I wonder if I can scare people away from this class 

by
Valentin Vornicu, Oct 30, 2008, 7:35 AM
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
How comes you do not have Olympiad-level classes for combinatorics, number theory or algebra? Geometry stuff also seems to be heavily covered in the WOOT classes. Is that focus only a mere tradition as the course was previously taught by Richard?
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
As for why geometry and not the other subjects, I think that the difference between the geometry needed for the USAMO and the geometry taught in standard high school curricula is greater than the differences for other subjects. Personally, before being exposed to MOP and olympiad-level material in general, I could solve some USAMO 2/5's if the topic wasn't geometry. The first MOP I went to I couldn't solve any of the geometry homework. Of course, this assumes that I had a standard high school math curriculum, but I hope I'm at least representative of some people.
Archives































































Tags
About Owner
- Posts: 16194
- Joined: Mar 28, 2003
Blog Stats
- Blog created: Jan 28, 2005
- Total entries: 940
- Total visits: 3309445
- Total comments: 3879
Search Blog