4. Remarkable geometrical inequalities (2).
by Virgil Nicula, Apr 19, 2010, 2:22 PM
III. Remarkable geometrical inequalities.
Let
,
,
Then exists the Cauchy-Bunyakovsky-Schwarz's inequality (C.B.S)
See here. We have equality if and only if
with the convention
(see here ). Another usual forms
.
Method 1. I"ll use the Lagrange's identity
Method 2. Consider the polynomial
Observe that
Hence
, i.e.
Remark. For
,
can write the C.B.S's inequality thus :
OR
OR
. Indeed :



Example. If
,
,
are positively, then
(the Nesbitt's imequality).
Metoda 1.
deoarece 
Metoda 2. Se foloseste identitatea
Metoda 3. Folosim principiul rearanjamentelor
inegalitatea Nesbitt.
Exemplu. In tr-un triunghi neobtuzunghic
exista inegalitatea Walker
.
Metoda 1.
.
Observatie.
si
(relatia Euler intr-un triunghi neobtuzunghic) 
. Am notat
- distanta de la circumcentrul
al
la dreapta
.
Metoda 2.
.
Am folosit relatiile cunoscute
etc si
etc. Vezi here articolul lui Cezar Lupu.
Extension of the Walker's inequality (see here). Let
be an interior point of the triangle
with the barycentrical coordinates
w.r.t.
. Then there is an inequality
.
Proof. For the point
denote
,
,
. Since 
a.s.o. obtain that
![$ \left[\sum (y + z)\cdot AD\right]^2\le \sum (y + z)\cdot\sum (y + z)\cdot AD^2 = 2\cdot\sum (y + z)\cdot AD^2 =$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/1/a/61a68346b194f8c8d1cbc154cc7357e9655204fe.png)
. In conclusion
with equality iff
.
Particular cases.
.
.
.

Exemplu 1. Fie numerele reale
,
, unde
si numerele reale pozitive
,
pentru care
si
.
Atunci exista inegalitatea Aczel
Aceasta inegalitate se obtine
imediat prin inlocuirile
si
(inegalitatea C.B.S.).
O interesanta consecinta este
Exemplu 2. Asemanator se pot genera asa zise " inegalitati de tip Aczel ". Pentru
, notam

Se obtine astfel lantul de inegalitati

care este o intarire a inegalitatii C.B.S. in situatia speciala in care cele doua siruri finite
,
,
sunt invers ordonate.
Exemplu 3. Se stie inegalitatea bilaterala



Fie numerele reale nenegative
,
,
. Atunci pentru orice numar pozitiv
exista relatia
(inegalitatea Schur).
Demonstratie. Presupunem fara a restrange generalitatea ca
Se observa ca
In concluzie,
![$ \sum x^r(x-y)(x-z)=(x-y)\cdot\left[x^r(x-z)-y^r(y-z)\right]+z^r(x-z)(y-z)\ge 0\ .$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/5/0/d501e3b4ffba9e824516acf9ed71923aa2315a38.png)
Extindere I. Daca tripletele
,
de numere reale sunt la fel ordonate, atunci 
Extindere II. Fie numerele reale
,
,
si
,
,
astfel incat
si ![$ y\in [x,z]\cup [z,x]\ .$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/2/f/92f01979419936fe36089f0e52a56384fe8515c4.png)
Consideram o functie convexa sau monotona
si
Atunci 



Demonstratie.


ceea ce este adevarat. Avem egalitate 
Cazuri particulare.

(inegalitatea Schur pentru
).

(inegalitatea Schur pentru
).
Inegalitatea o regasim si in una din urmatoarele forme :


etc. Se observa ca
Obtinem 
Fie un triunghi
si notam proiectiile
,
,
ale unui punct
interior triunghiului pe dreptele suport
,
, 
ale laturilor acestuia. Atunci
(inegalitatea Erdos-Mordell - vezi aici).
Demonstratie. Proiectam segmentul
pe ![$ BC\ \ : \ \ PA\cdot \sin A= YZ\ge \Pr_{BC}([YZ])=\Pr_{BC}([PY])+\Pr_{BC}([PZ])\implies$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/e/5/8e533668786b52cac0ff2d53b159f1a23e2d8891.png)
.
. Obtinem :

Extindere I. Fie un triunghi
si punctele
,
,
. Notam proiectiile
,
,
ale unui punct
interior triunghiului pe dreptele suport
,
,
. Atunci exista inegalitatea

Demonstratie. Proiectam segmentele
,
,
pe
,
,
respectiv ![$ : \ PA\cdot\sin A=YZ\ge\Pr_{EF}([YZ])=$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/a/e/aae2143922dfef357fc9c7a34ade5e1a9f082f58.png)

Asadar, 

Cazuri particulare. Daca
,
,
sunt mijloacele laturilor corespunzatoare, atunci regasim inegalitatea Erdos-Mordell.
Daca
,
,
sunt proiectiile lui
pe laturile corespunzatoare se obtine inegalitatea 
Demonstratie directa :

In concluzie,

Extindere II. Fie un triunghi
si punctele
,
,
interioare triunghiului
astfel incat
,
si
. Notam
,
si
. Atunci exista inegalitatea

Demonstratie. Se observa ca
, adica
. Asadar, 

unde
Se arata usor ca
. Similar

![$ \sum \left[\frac{1}{2}\left(NZ-MZ\right)\left(\frac{a}{b}-\frac{b}{a}\right) + \frac{1}{2}\left(NZ+MZ\right)\left(\frac{a}{b}+\frac{b}{a}\right)\right]\stackrel{(*)}{\ =\ }$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/a/7/4a7cd9510644a2c29b2382eb2aa11d85a330d83c.png)

(Mitrinovic) ;
(Blundon).
(Blundon & Gerretsen).
Demonstratie.
Se stie ca 
Din produsul inegalitatilor evidente
, adica
etc., 
, adica
de unde obtinem
. Aplicam
:

Este necesar sa aratam acum ca
In inegalitatea
inlocuim

Adunam relatiile
si
(vezi si aici).
Remark. I"ll show that
. Observe that for
have
, i.e.
. Therefore,
.
Din inegalitatea
obtinem
, deoarece

In concluzie, am dovedit (intr-o exprimare compacta !) ca
Tinand seama ca
obtinem inegalitatea
Asadar,


Se stie ca
si se arata usor ca ![$ 4R^2+4Rr+3r^2\le \left[2R+\left(3\sqrt 3-4\right)r\right]^2\ .$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/2/b/a2ba22b7c221f48ce9b8361c8e14d6e68a9e8dd9.png)
In concluzie,
, adica 
Observatii.
Pentru un triunghi
notam
. Atunci
, adica
inegalitatea
(Virgil Nicula & Cosmin Pohoata, Mathematical Reflections).
Intr-adevar,
deoarece
Pe de alta parte,
.
In sfarsit,
.

Obtinem lantul de implicatii

Obtinem lantul de implicatii
Din sirurile de implicatii
si
se obtine lantul de echivalente 
care exprima echivalenta intre cele trei inegalitati fundamentale din geometria triunghiului.
Din cele prezentate pana acum rezulta un lant interesant de inegalitati centrat in
care este des folosit in aplicatii.

Lantul poate fi "slabit" spre dreapta :




deoarece
si 
Se poate usor arata ca intr-un triunghi neechilateral
avem relatia
Din relatia
in particular pentru
obtinem : 
Asadar,
, ceea ce este adevarat deoarece 
Guinand's theorem. Daca
este mijlocul lui
, atunci
deoarece
.
Intr-adevar, stiind ca 
se arata usor ca inegalitatea propusa devine echivalenta cu inegalitatea remarcabila
See LXVII-message and here








Method 1. I"ll use the Lagrange's identity

Method 2. Consider the polynomial




Remark. For















Example. If




Metoda 1.


Metoda 2. Se foloseste identitatea

Metoda 3. Folosim principiul rearanjamentelor

Exemplu. In tr-un triunghi neobtuzunghic


Metoda 1.


Observatie.








Metoda 2.



Am folosit relatiile cunoscute









Proof. For the point





a.s.o. obtain that

![$ \left[\sum (y + z)\cdot AD\right]^2\le \sum (y + z)\cdot\sum (y + z)\cdot AD^2 = 2\cdot\sum (y + z)\cdot AD^2 =$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/1/a/61a68346b194f8c8d1cbc154cc7357e9655204fe.png)




Particular cases.





Exemplu 1. Fie numerele reale







Atunci exista inegalitatea Aczel

imediat prin inlocuirile


O interesanta consecinta este


Exemplu 2. Asemanator se pot genera asa zise " inegalitati de tip Aczel ". Pentru


Se obtine astfel lantul de inegalitati


care este o intarire a inegalitatii C.B.S. in situatia speciala in care cele doua siruri finite



Exemplu 3. Se stie inegalitatea bilaterala

![$ \odot\ \ \left|\begin{array}{c}
X=3\cdot\sum bc\le \left(\sum a\right)^2=A\\\\
Y=\sum bc\le \sum a^2=B\\\\
P=\sqrt 3\cdot\sum bc=\sqrt {XY}\\\\
\left[\ A-X=B-Y=\frac 12\cdot\sum (b-c)^2\ \right]\end{array}\right|$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/c/9/bc9e0d3a8834356717f6e8ea801fe8b82a6ab17b.png)


![$ \odot\ \ \left|\begin{array}{c}
X=\left(\sum a\right)^2\le 3\cdot\sum a^2=A\\\\
Y=\sum bc\le \sum a^2=B\\\\
P=3\cdot\sqrt {abc\sum a}\le \sum a\cdot \sqrt {\sum bc}=\sqrt {XY}\\\\
\left[\ A-X=2(B-Y)=\sum (b-c)^2\ \right]\end{array}\right|$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/0/e/f0eb349b474b9686ffac135818dcfcaa1ad605b7.png)


![$ \odot\ \ \left|\begin{array}{c}
X=3\cdot\sum bc\le \left(\sum a\right)^2=A\\\\
Y=\left(\sum a\right)^2\le 3\cdot\sum a^2=B\\\\
P=3\cdot\sum bc\le \sqrt 3\cdot\sum a\cdot \sqrt {\sum a^2}=\sqrt {XY}\\\\
\left[\ 2(A-X)=(B-Y)=\sum (b-c)^2\ \right]\end{array}\right|$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/0/7/e07a05ae60a84d55c0f3c9a05bcaa77c3ee2cc5d.png)








Demonstratie. Presupunem fara a restrange generalitatea ca



![$ \sum x^r(x-y)(x-z)=(x-y)\cdot\left[x^r(x-z)-y^r(y-z)\right]+z^r(x-z)(y-z)\ge 0\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/5/0/d501e3b4ffba9e824516acf9ed71923aa2315a38.png)
Extindere I. Daca tripletele



Extindere II. Fie numerele reale







![$ y\in [x,z]\cup [z,x]\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/2/f/92f01979419936fe36089f0e52a56384fe8515c4.png)
Consideram o functie convexa sau monotona










Demonstratie.






Cazuri particulare.








Inegalitatea o regasim si in una din urmatoarele forme :





















ale laturilor acestuia. Atunci

Demonstratie. Proiectam segmentul
![$ [YZ]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/4/c/b4c38c64fa1234f57033382afe9c34b12fb348e1.png)
![$ BC\ \ : \ \ PA\cdot \sin A= YZ\ge \Pr_{BC}([YZ])=\Pr_{BC}([PY])+\Pr_{BC}([PZ])\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/e/5/8e533668786b52cac0ff2d53b159f1a23e2d8891.png)




















Demonstratie. Proiectam segmentele
![$ [YZ]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/4/c/b4c38c64fa1234f57033382afe9c34b12fb348e1.png)
![$ [ZX]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/8/ad8cc8c58fb9d44a352463f9deb7fa53b039640a.png)
![$ [XY]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/7/1/271f927ba3da0d6a7fd173ceb8e4817046c5c32b.png)



![$ : \ PA\cdot\sin A=YZ\ge\Pr_{EF}([YZ])=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/a/e/aae2143922dfef357fc9c7a34ade5e1a9f082f58.png)
![$ \Pr_{EF}([PY])+\Pr_{EF}([PZ])=PY\cdot\sin\widehat {AEF}+PZ\cdot\sin\widehat {AFE}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/7/9/d79a56f3f109ff89185609be03b4ad65651ab85b.png)







Cazuri particulare. Daca



Daca





Demonstratie directa :


In concluzie,

















Demonstratie. Se observa ca






unde





![$ \sum \left[\frac{1}{2}\left(NZ-MZ\right)\left(\frac{a}{b}-\frac{b}{a}\right) + \frac{1}{2}\left(NZ+MZ\right)\left(\frac{a}{b}+\frac{b}{a}\right)\right]\stackrel{(*)}{\ =\ }$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/a/7/4a7cd9510644a2c29b2382eb2aa11d85a330d83c.png)
![$ \sum\frac{1}{2}\left[\left(NZ+MZ\right)\left(\frac{a}{b}+\frac{b}{a}\right)\right]\ge$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/2/0/920d15b9cf2393fccfc1748d76b493a1aeee7159.png)






Demonstratie.


Din produsul inegalitatilor evidente








![$ \sqrt[3]{p-a)(p-b)(p-c)}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/8/b/78beb285b6aa8fd05b42fb1a35da74648251a9e3.png)

![$ p\ge 3\sqrt[3]{pr^2}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/4/8/9487fe71b62bb208ba3731d1f3b3508811bf4d18.png)



Este necesar sa aratam acum ca



![$ 3p(p-a)(p-b)(p-c)\le \left[r(4R+r)\right]^2$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/e/0/de05838d17b91050bf692b381dac3961a7c64cb1.png)


Adunam relatiile




Remark. I"ll show that









![$ 3\cdot\sum (p-b)(p-c)\ \le \left[\sum (p-a)\right]^2$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/e/4/7e4deb83c8a211d02c0011eca504d2838a032965.png)




In concluzie, am dovedit (intr-o exprimare compacta !) ca




![$ \sum a^2=2\cdot\left[p^2-r(4R+r)\right]\ \le\ 2\left[\left(4R^2+4Rr+3r^2\right)-r(4R+r)\right]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/b/0/5b0e727dc17e87cc6fc5178096cb44eb120b0888.png)


![$ \odot\ \left\|\ \begin{array}{c}
IH^2=4R^2+4Rr+3r^2-p^2\ge 0\\\\
9\cdot IG^2=IN^2=p^2+5r^2-16Rr\ge 0\\\\
H\Gamma^2=4R^2\left[1-\frac {2p^2(2R-r)}{R(4R+r)^2}\right]\ge 0\end{array}\ \right\|$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/d/4/9d412e6712e4df455fda9e7072959bad4489b32e.png)




![$ 4R^2+4Rr+3r^2\le \left[2R+\left(3\sqrt 3-4\right)r\right]^2\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/2/b/a2ba22b7c221f48ce9b8361c8e14d6e68a9e8dd9.png)
In concluzie,
![$ p^2\le \left[2R+\left(3\sqrt 3-4\right)r\right]^2$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/4/d/74d1b107047604b7f1b06f4b98b7ab74be3fe148.png)



Observatii.




inegalitatea

Intr-adevar,



In sfarsit,



Obtinem lantul de implicatii



Obtinem lantul de implicatii

Din sirurile de implicatii



care exprima echivalenta intre cele trei inegalitati fundamentale din geometria triunghiului.





Lantul poate fi "slabit" spre dreapta :













Se poate usor arata ca intr-un triunghi neechilateral





Asadar,



Guinand's theorem. Daca

![$[HG]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/b/b/8bb9e1d2bf6fd2ba24216d5f86049a176bb4d30a.png)





se arata usor ca inegalitatea propusa devine echivalenta cu inegalitatea remarcabila

See LXVII-message and here
This post has been edited 40 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Apr 25, 2016, 3:32 AM