309. Beautiful problem ! IRAN Selection Test for IMO, 2004.
by Virgil Nicula, Aug 14, 2011, 12:06 AM
Very nice Darij Grinberg's post !
Lemma - Gergonne theorem on pedal triangles. Let
in the plane of
the absolute value
of the power of
w.r.t. the circumcircle
of
the orthogonal projections
,
,
of
on
,
,
the area
of
. The area
of
can be computed using formula
.
Proof. Let
a.s.o. I"ll use the well-known identity
. We have
and
. Hence
and
lie on the
circle with diameter
. Thus,
. Similarly,
and
lie on the circle with diameter
. Thus,
. But
and since
,
,
and
are concyclic, we have
. Thus,
. Hence
. Now by
another famous area formula for triangles, the area of
is
. Hence,
. Since
and
lie on the circle with
diameter
, the circumcircle of
has diameter
and thus, after the extended sine law, we get
, or with other words,
.
. Therefore,
. On the other hand,
. Therefore,
. By the sine law in triangle BMA', we have
. Thus,
. Now,
, but the concyclicity of
,
,
and
yields
,
so that
. So we get
, so that
.
PP. Suppose that
is a point inside of a triangle
with the inradius
. Denote
. Prove that
.
Proof. We know that
is the absolute value of the power of
w.r.t. the circumcircle of triangle
. Hence, the inequality we have to prove can be rewritten as
or
. Now, let
,
,
be the orthogonal projections of
on the sides
,
,
and let
be the area of triangle 
and
the area of triangle
. The Gergonne's theorem (see upper lemma) on pedal triangles states that
. But on the other hand, if
is circumradius of
, then
. Thus,
and
.
and
lie on the circle with
diameter
. Hence,
and similarly,
,
. Hence, if we multiply the inequality in question
with
, we get
or
.
By the formula for
we derived above, this becomes equivalent to
. With other words, the radius of the circumcircle of
is greater or equal to the inradius of
. But this is known - The radius of any circle which cuts or touches all three sidelines of a triangle is greater or equal to the inradius of the triangle, with equality iff the
circle coincides with the incircle of the triangle. Hence, our inequality is proven. Equality holds only if the circumcircle of
coincides with the incircle of
, i. e. if
is
the incenter of
. Notably, the inequality we have proven is a generalization of the well-known
inequality (just let
be the circumcenter of
).
Remark. Another proof of
can obtain by the
-point inequality from here post #1 to
and
in the circumcircle of
.
Lemma - Gergonne theorem on pedal triangles. Let


















Proof. Let






circle with diameter
![$[BM]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/8/d/b8df50365ac4274a59b15564d2715bbc99693b79.png)



![$[AM]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/f/9/1f9b22599237fb6240a50b5f75e8f6ced1292374.png)













another famous area formula for triangles, the area of





diameter
![$[AM]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/f/9/1f9b22599237fb6240a50b5f75e8f6ced1292374.png)

![$[AM]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/f/9/1f9b22599237fb6240a50b5f75e8f6ced1292374.png)

















so that





PP. Suppose that





Proof. We know that














and












diameter










By the formula for




circle coincides with the incircle of the triangle. Hence, our inequality is proven. Equality holds only if the circumcircle of



the incenter of




Remark. Another proof of





This post has been edited 34 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Nov 20, 2015, 11:10 AM