337. Nice metrical problems.
by Virgil Nicula, Feb 26, 2012, 1:37 PM
PP1. Let
for which
and exists
so that
and
. Find the value of
.
Proof 1 (metric). Let
so that
and
. Since
obtain
, i.e.

. The generalized Pythagoras' in
. We"ll eliminate
between
and
, i.e.

,
. Let
. Relation becomes
![$\left[\left(1+\sqrt 2\right)\lambda -1\right]^2\stackrel{(\lambda \ne 0)}{\iff}$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/5/8/558126ecc434dcefe7d0073e0aee7042980ef768.png)
. Using
obtain
. i.e.
. Hence
, where
appears in
. Remark that for
obtain
, i.e.
is
-isosceles and
-right.
PP2. Let
with circumcircle
and
. Denote
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Let
,
for which
. Thus
,
are homologously in the similarity
,
is
-isosceles and
,
are
-isosceles , i.e.
,
,
. Hence
.
Proof 2. Evaluate the areas of the triangles
and
.
Generalization. Consider in
two points
so that
and
,
. Prove that
.
Proof 1.
, what is truly.
Proof 2. Evaluate the areas of the triangles
and
.
Proof 3. Apply the well-known relations
.
PP3. Let
be the centroid of
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Prove easily that
. Let the midpoint
of
and
so
that
is midpoint of
. Observe that
and
. Apply Appolonius' theorem to the
-medians in triangles:
.
Eliminate
between upper relations: ![$2\cdot PB^2+2\cdot PC^2-BC^2=2\cdot PG^2+\left[4\cdot PG^2 -2\cdot PA^2+4\cdot GA^2\right]-GA^2\iff$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/2/c/32cd06e331cc9b659ad69e036bd9ff82d6585357.png)
.
Remark. I used only the Appolonius' theorem (the "relation of the median in a triangle" or the "law of parallelogram").
.
Proof 2. Apply the Stewart's theorem to the cevian
in 
. Apply relation of median
in
. The relation
becomes ![$ 6\cdot PG^2+3\cdot GA^2=2\cdot PA^2+\left[2\cdot \left(PB^2+PC^2\right)-BC^2\right]$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/f/c/7fcc657100f6638cf42737873158755b8efd3046.png)
.
Remark.
there is
, where
are normal barycentrical coordinates
of given
and
is power of
w.r.t. circumcircle of given
. In particular case
we have 
and
becomes our identity
.
PP4. If
and
are lengths of sides in
,
respectively while
and
their angles so that
,
. Prove that 
Proof 1. I'll use the well-known remarkable identity
. Indeed,

, what is truly. Denote the length
of the circumradius for
and the length
of the
circumradius for
. Thus,
and
.
Remark.
, what is truly.
Proof 2. Denote the point
so that
and the point
so that
. Observe that
. Finally denote
so that
. Obviously, the
is isosceles with apex
, hence
. Following equality holds:
, where
. Apply the Stewart's relation to
with cevian
and obtain that
.
PP5.
is a square. A semicircle
is drawn on
with
as diameter. A quartes-circle
is drawn
with
as center and
as radius. Denote
. Find the area of their intersection.
Proof. Let
be a chord of
so that
. Then is well-known that
, the length of the arc
is
, the area of sector
is
and area of the segment
w.r.t.
is
. Let
. Thus
and
. The required area is 

. In conclusion, the required area is
.
PP6 (Euler). Let
and
,
,
so that
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Denote the areas
,
and
. Prove easily that
. Using the Van Aubel's relations obtain
. The relation
is equivalently with 
, what is evidently or well-known.
Proof 2 (without Van Aubel's relation).Denote
and
. Therefore,
. Thus, 
.
PP7 (Iran, 2011). In
let
and
be the tangent points of incircle
with
and
respectively. The tangent at
to the circumcircle 
of
intersects
at
. Prove that

, where
,
and
is the Lemoine's point (symmedian center) .
Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.
.
.
.
.
.
is the conjugate of
w.r.t.
is polar line of
.
PP8. Let
be a square and
,
be two interior points for which
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. I"ll work in the analytical system
, where
,
,
,
. Denote:
- the slope of the line
,
;
and
. Thus,
,
and
;
;
;
. Therefore 
.
Thus,

![$(m+n)(1-mn)+mn[(1+m)(1-n)+(1+n)(1-m)]=$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/b/3/6b3df64ae637e3a42d32e86e055026aa99f0dd62.png)
, what is truly. Remark. If
and
, then
is tangent at
to the circle
, similarly for
.
Proof 2. Denote
and construct
.
Since
. In conclusion, the triangles
and
are right
.
PP9. Let
and the feet
of
-median and
-bisector respectively. Circumcircle
of
cuts again
in
and
in
. Show that
.
Proof 1. Observe that
and from the powers of
and
w.r.t. the circle
obtain that
.
Proof 2. Denote the second intersection
of
with the circumcircle of
and its diameter
. Observe that 
is a cyclical quadrilateral and
. Prove easily that
from where obtain that
.
PP10. Let an equilateral
with
and an internal point
with
,
and
. Prove that
.
Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.
. So
. Denote
. The generalized Pythagoras'
. Show easily
. Indeed,

.
Using the identity
obtain easily that
. Denote
. Therefore, the previous relation becomes
.
PP11. Let
be a rectangle and let
,
be two points so that
,
,
. Find the area
of
.
Proof. Let
, where
and
. So
and
. From
and
obtain
.
Generalization. Let
be a rectangle and let
,
be two points so that
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
. Observe that
and
. Therefore, 
and

, what is truly. Very nice relation
PP12. Let
,
,
,
be four points , where
is a square and
. Prove that 
Proof. Prove easily that
. Therefore,
, i.e. the relation
.
PP13. Let
be a quadrilateral what is inscribed in the circle with the diameter
. Denote
so that
. Show that
.
Proof 1.
.
Proof 2.
.
An easy extension. Let
be a cyclical quadrilateral. Consider two points
so that
,
i.e. the rays
are isogonals in
and the rays
are isogonals
. Show that
.
Proof 1.
.
Proof 2.
.
Proof 3. Denote the second intersections
and
of the lines
and
with the circumcircle of
. Observe that
, i.e.
is isosceles trapezoid. By symmetry get that
.
PP14. Circles
are all exterior tangent to each other, are all interior tangent to the circle 
and are all exterior tangent to the circle
. Denote
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
. Prove easily that
and
. Thus,
and
.
Now I"ll use the well-known identity
and get finally 
![$2R\cdot\sqrt {R\left[R^3-2mR^2+\left(m^2+n\right)R-(mn-p)\right]}\iff$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/d/3/bd38d988061a0234da2cb22ee49c3c442dbfc67e.png)

. I"ll find analogously and the second relation from the conclusion. Thus,
.
I"ll use same notations
. Hence
and
.
Now I"ll use again the identity
and get finally 
![$2r\cdot\sqrt {r\left[r^3+2mr^2+\left(m^2+n\right)r+(mn-p)\right]}\iff$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/2/d/92dce0b90cdaefed8bb99ff4ebedf088cab69c0f.png)

. Observe that
and
.
Remark. Denote
. This problem has a real sense iff


, i.e. the values
are the sidelengths of a triangle.
I used the well-known identities in
and
, where
.
PP15. Let
be an interior point of
and denote
and
. Suppose that
,
and
. Find ![$[AFPE]\ .$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/d/7/9d79957790bbc2aea80b7fb4fd6948c466511c15.png)
Proof. Denote
. ![$(1)\ \ \boxed {\ [BPF]\cdot [CPE]=[PEF]\cdot [PBC]\ }\Longrightarrow 4\cdot 13=8\cdot v\Longrightarrow \boxed {\ v=\frac{13}{2}\ }\ .$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/3/5/b3501f3441484a42bc03b6032b660f75edac2a26.png)

Remark. The relation
is well-known in a convex quadrilateral
, where 
An easy extension. Let
be an interior point of
,
,
. Prove that ![$ [BPF]=m\ \wedge\ [CPE]=$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/1/f/a1fb17c7178a4465fb89bf367771947d95ee1b13.png)
Particular case :
.
Lemma. For the point
which belongs to the inside of
denote
.
Proof.
so that
. Apply the van Aubel's relations
. Show easily that
.
PP16. For the point
which belongs to the inside of
denote
. Suppose that
and
. Find the area
.
Proof. Denote
and apply the relation
. Observe that
, i.e.
is the midpoint of ![$[BC]$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
and
. If
is the midpoint of
, then
. Observe that
, i.e.
is
-right-angled triangle. Therefore,
, i.e.
. Since
.
Generalization. Denote
with
and for the point
which belongs to the inside of
denote
. Prove that
.
Proof. Suppose that
, where
. Observe that
has the barycentrical coordinates
w.r.t
.
Denote
so that
. Thus,
. Analogously obtain that 
. Therefore,
.
Since

.
Remark. In our particular case obtain
.
PP17. Let
be a circle and let
be two points so that
. Denote the point
of
so that
,
so that
and the point
such that
and
separates
. Find the measure of the angle
.
Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.
and denote the diameter
of
. Thus,

. So
.
Remark. If the point
is the midpoint of
, Then
.
Directly. Suppose w.l.o.g.
and let diameter
. Then

.
PP18. Let an acute
with the midpoint
of
. Draw the perpendicular
from the orthocenter
to
. Show that
.
Proof 1 (synthetic). Let
,
,
be the projections of
to the sides of
and
. Are well-known
that
and
is a harmonical division. In conclusion,
, i.e.
.
Proof 2 (metric). Denote
. Using the power of
w.r.t. the circumcircle of the quadrilateral 
obtain that

.
Proof 3 (metric).
is inscribed in the circle with the diameter
. Thus,
is cyclically.
Therefore,
, i.e.
.






Proof 1 (metric). Let

















![$c^2\left[b\left(1+\sqrt 2\right)-c\right]^2$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/3/9/7399c0689fc9c1ac02dddd9149d66571ce441851.png)


![$\left[\left(1+\sqrt 2\right)\lambda -1\right]^2\stackrel{(\lambda \ne 0)}{\iff}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/5/8/558126ecc434dcefe7d0073e0aee7042980ef768.png)

















PP2. Let





Proof 1. Let



















Proof 2. Evaluate the areas of the triangles






Generalization. Consider in






Proof 1.



Proof 2. Evaluate the areas of the triangles



Proof 3. Apply the well-known relations

PP3. Let



Proof 1. Prove easily that


![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)

that

![$[GS]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/6/9/169ead1d786c6a2c780f385f7dd5beeb0f92e879.png)





Eliminate

![$2\cdot PB^2+2\cdot PC^2-BC^2=2\cdot PG^2+\left[4\cdot PG^2 -2\cdot PA^2+4\cdot GA^2\right]-GA^2\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/2/c/32cd06e331cc9b659ad69e036bd9ff82d6585357.png)




Remark. I used only the Appolonius' theorem (the "relation of the median in a triangle" or the "law of parallelogram").

Proof 2. Apply the Stewart's theorem to the cevian




in


![$ 6\cdot PG^2+3\cdot GA^2=2\cdot PA^2+\left[2\cdot \left(PB^2+PC^2\right)-BC^2\right]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/f/c/7fcc657100f6638cf42737873158755b8efd3046.png)



Remark.













PP4. If









Proof 1. I'll use the well-known remarkable identity










circumradius for











Proof 2. Denote the point



















PP5.





with



Proof. Let
![$[XY]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/d/5/bd5db5e85aa6daea3eebecaea5d26721edd15203.png)


![$[XOY]=\frac {r^2\sin \phi}{2}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/b/0fb5265e06dd5da2b32fb8b9121690c958db9e53.png)






![$\boxed{sg(r,\phi )=sc(r,\phi )-[XOY]=\frac {r^2}{2}\cdot (\phi -\sin\phi)}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/2/a/52a7a05e564de0c5a1c90ec56685743033af0f10.png)












PP6 (Euler). Let






Proof 1. Denote the areas
![$[BPC]=x$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/c/9/0c93f729b44cc7b976cc7a7113a464df4bb2daff.png)
![$[CPA]=y$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/b/4/7b4041fd04591d9e1e6ea497f33c033e99a1e1e3.png)
![$[APB]=z$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/2/7/127be7751204fb61259ba48f8ca1537336eb7e6a.png)





Proof 2 (without Van Aubel's relation).Denote


![$\sum \frac {1}{1+u}=\sum \frac {PD}{AD}=\sum \frac {[BPC]}{[BAC]}=1$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/9/e/c9eeb36a00f25eb1a4fed7148cf7bcb01c1f73c4.png)





PP7 (Iran, 2011). In








of













Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.








![$[BLC]=[BIC]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/2/2/b22d151327d1b64eb9b7341eea7db18c0a1bc421.png)



















PP8. Let





Proof 1. I"ll work in the analytical system
























Thus,







![$(m+n)(1-mn)+mn[(1+m)(1-n)+(1+n)(1-m)]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/b/3/6b3df64ae637e3a42d32e86e055026aa99f0dd62.png)
![$(1-mn)[n(1+m)+m(1+n)]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/2/d/92d45118260790553e3513e6e11ae1fe1a92f001.png)






Proof 2. Denote



Since





PP9. Let











Proof 1. Observe that





Proof 2. Denote the second intersection



![$[MN]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/6/2/162e03b9cf481dcfb3d5bdf078be84feab5d2f6e.png)

is a cyclical quadrilateral and



PP10. Let an equilateral







Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.











Using the identity






PP11. Let



![$[ABE]=8$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/5/b/a5b48a85aa6d54310e16f727f0a5dcf244c519f9.png)
![$[ADF]=5$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/e/4/5e477a014478992e241797edd215e3ded80eae2d.png)
![$[EFC]=9$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/8/7/a871f7614c8bb47f6b5ebc6ce1202ba6e97e6ad6.png)
![$[AEF]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/3/c/13c70c42a7bfa54d17fc9289b2134a7a1fd4abcf.png)

Proof. Let



![$\left\{\begin{array}{cccc}
[ABE]=8 & \implies & ea=16 & (1)\\\
[CEF]=9 & \implies & f(c-e)=18 & (2)\\\
[ADF]=5 & \implies & c(a-f)=10 & (3)\end{array}\right\|\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/c/4/5c4abc3df2b4a919fa79d3da8faa524dc14553ac.png)








![$[ABCD]=40\iff [AEF]=18$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/b/b/2bbfc3b36f93ce754c4d59c44a628e6b5391cef9.png)
Generalization. Let



![$\left\{\begin{array}{ccc}
[ABE]=x & ; & [ADF]=y\\\
[EFC]=z & ; & [AEF]=t\end{array}\right\|$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/f/8/bf8966daadbaf1db7a480b78b222e275a7eb8e68.png)

Proof. Denote




and

![$[ac-(x+y+z)]^2+4xy=(x+y+z)^2\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/9/0/99092dfff2a849b896ca2d4966bb3858b64de77f.png)

![$(ac)^2+ae\cdot cf=ac\cdot[ae+cf+(c-e)(a-f)]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/9/4/894ecfe0fa0ceba584eccdb26ba6067f07813952.png)


PP12. Let







Proof. Prove easily that






PP13. Let

![$[AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/9/3/0936990e6625d65357ca51006c08c9fe3e04ba0c.png)



Proof 1.


Proof 2.

![$\left\{\begin{array}{c}
\frac {SB}{SD}= \frac {[ABC]}{[ADC]}=\frac {ab}{cd}\\\\
\frac {MB}{MD}\cdot \frac {SB}{SD}\stackrel{(\mathrm{Steiner's\ th}.)}{=}\left(\frac ad\right)^2\\\\
\frac {ND}{NB}\cdot\frac {SD}{SB}\stackrel{(\mathrm{Steiner's\ th}.)}{=}\left(\frac cb\right)^2\end{array}\right\|\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/a/c/dac6fef3c0dd53bb29689de5ab0edbcecafdf5cb.png)


An easy extension. Let



i.e. the rays





Proof 1.


Proof 2.

![$\left\{\begin{array}{c}
\frac {SB}{SD}= \frac {[ABC]}{[ADC]}=\frac {ab}{cd}\\\\
\frac {MB}{MD}\cdot \frac {SB}{SD}\stackrel{(\mathrm{Steiner's\ th}.)}{=}\left(\frac ad\right)^2\\\\
\frac {ND}{NB}\cdot\frac {SD}{SB}\stackrel{(\mathrm{Steiner's\ th}.)}{=}\left(\frac cb\right)^2\end{array}\right\|\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/a/c/dac6fef3c0dd53bb29689de5ab0edbcecafdf5cb.png)


Proof 3. Denote the second intersections









PP14. Circles


and are all exterior tangent to the circle



Proof. Denote





Now I"ll use the well-known identity



![$2R\cdot\sqrt {R\left[R^3-2mR^2+\left(m^2+n\right)R-(mn-p)\right]}\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/d/3/bd38d988061a0234da2cb22ee49c3c442dbfc67e.png)
![$\left(2R^3-2mR^2+nR+p\right)^2=4R^3\left[R^3-2mR^2+\left(m^2+n\right)R-(mn-p)\right]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/9/3/4930f98872e05922d3799ee7db27b0de75e1c51c.png)



I"ll use same notations



Now I"ll use again the identity



![$2r\cdot\sqrt {r\left[r^3+2mr^2+\left(m^2+n\right)r+(mn-p)\right]}\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/2/d/92dce0b90cdaefed8bb99ff4ebedf088cab69c0f.png)
![$\left(-2r^3-2mr^2-nr+p\right)^2=4r^3\left[r^3+2mr^2+\left(m^2+n\right)r+(mn-p)\right]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/0/6/906247c5778d1af3eef6cfe43538d4be9acb2d1f.png)




Remark. Denote










I used the well-known identities in



PP15. Let




![$[BPF] = 4$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/0/5/505ad3aebf4c94a95c779868030950c41470ab4e.png)
![$[BPC]= 8$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/6/0/560790fb42c7623d9c3d9e0e99b7bd20420d7d74.png)
![$[CPE] = 13$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/5/9/6590591d2f65a921630c2753fcedac9504776e55.png)
![$[AFPE]\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/d/7/9d79957790bbc2aea80b7fb4fd6948c466511c15.png)
Proof. Denote
![$u=[AEF]\ ,\ v=[PEF]\ ,\ x=[AEPF]\ (u+v=x)$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/5/4/c5445f6e53db043660e4b57333100eb08da71735.png)
![$(1)\ \ \boxed {\ [BPF]\cdot [CPE]=[PEF]\cdot [PBC]\ }\Longrightarrow 4\cdot 13=8\cdot v\Longrightarrow \boxed {\ v=\frac{13}{2}\ }\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/3/5/b3501f3441484a42bc03b6032b660f75edac2a26.png)
![$\frac{[BAE]}{[BCE]}=\frac{EA}{EC}=\frac{[AEF]}{[CEF]}\Longrightarrow \frac{4+\frac{13}{2}+u}{8+13}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/e/a/eeab47484fcdc33b88afda6a7c628676cf3286c4.png)



Remark. The relation



An easy extension. Let




![$ [BPF]=m\ \wedge\ [CPE]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/1/f/a1fb17c7178a4465fb89bf367771947d95ee1b13.png)
![$n\ \wedge\ [BPC]=p\ \implies\ [AFPE]=\frac {mn(2p+m+n)}{p^2-mn}\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/8/4/9849b6941977b59c2da783ce310ad1037eae2d74.png)
![$\left\{\begin{array}{c}
m=2\\\
n=4\\\
p=8\end{array}\right\|\implies [APFE]=\frac {22}{7}\approx \pi$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/7/b/77b9dae4d6a17ebd451d4a2f64669211ad6f5352.png)
Lemma. For the point




Proof.





PP16. For the point





![$S=[ABC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/3/a/b3ae3d445111e4dd28be75922309d3270079368c.png)
Proof. Denote





![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
and



![$[PB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/2/b/32b69bff37445b424d25083f8f3637fbff8fb6f9.png)




![$[PDL]=\frac 12\cdot PD\cdot PL$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/5/3/b5368aa40a0fa08c6ad2dd7776c76bcf6c81d455.png)
![$\boxed{\ [PDL]=\frac {27}{2}\ }$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/9/0/790bd428c5f47aaff985da87cd64296d2c9afb68.png)
![$\frac {[PDL]}{[ACB]}=\frac {[PDL]}{[PDB]}\cdot\frac {[PDB]}{[PCB]}\cdot\frac {[PCB]}{[ACB]}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/0/5/d05ebd05815c0f4d001bdaa78de5bafe6103ed71.png)

![$S=8\cdot [PDL]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/3/8/03899d83f41973109cfd5aa3584111cbc52c83db.png)

Generalization. Denote
![$[x,y,z]=[XYZ]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/2/7/c27ebcf8539970e2711657e5a92bb8de4c281af5.png)




![$\boxed{\ [ABC]=\frac {DA}{DP}\cdot\frac {EB}{EP}\cdot\frac {FC}{FP}\cdot\left[\frac {PA\cdot PD}{AD},\frac {PB\cdot PE}{BE},\frac {PC\cdot PF}{CF}\right]\ }$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/8/5/985cc21c7b01703cd2d422d05085d8bd36656d2b.png)
Proof. Suppose that





Denote
![$L\in [PB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/9/3/c9391c18f363e914e33929a5d311028016aa3437.png)







![$[PDL]=\left[a_2\ ,\ \frac {b_1b_2(a_1+a_2)}{a_1(b_1+b_2)}\ ,\ \frac {c_1c_2(a_1+a_2)}{a_1(c_1+c_2)}\right]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/4/7/047fd23ed53e993a0bd1586e0c9f36e4ec55e307.png)
![$\boxed{\ [PDL]=\frac {(a_1+a_2)^2}{a_1^2}\cdot\left[\frac {a_1a_2}{a_1+a_2}\ ,\ \frac {b_1b_2}{b_1+b_2}\ ,\ \frac {c_1c_2}{c_1+c_2}\right]\ }$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/d/f/2dfe2ddf795f21e7847a94014594801d194a9848.png)
Since
![$\frac {[PDL]}{[ACB]}=\frac {[PDL]}{[PDB]}\cdot\frac {[PDB]}{[PCB]}\cdot\frac {[PCB]}{[ACB]}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/0/5/d05ebd05815c0f4d001bdaa78de5bafe6103ed71.png)

![$S=[PDL]\cdot \frac {PB}{PL}\cdot\frac {CB}{DB}\cdot\frac {AD}{PD}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/5/ad5731d070fb1ee30572aeed918550c52cd9462c.png)
![$\frac {(a_1+a_2)^2}{a_1^2}\cdot\left[\frac {a_1a_2}{a_1+a_2}\ ,\ \frac {b_1b_2}{b_1+b_2}\ ,\ \frac {c_1c_2}{c_1+c_2}\right]\cdot$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/a/b/1ab66ffe616a17e7ea0844818d1c6685e39d17af.png)





![$\left[\frac {a_1a_2}{a_1+a_2}\ ,\ \frac {b_1b_2}{b_1+b_2}\ ,\ \frac {c_1c_2}{c_1+c_2}\right]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/0/9/609e453f9f5875e482340ffa7418ff60f9e7d04f.png)
![$[ABC]=\frac {DA}{DP}\cdot$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/5/0/550d86d69125cdc298bc6fc04a8e81f94f857298.png)

![$\left[\frac {PA\cdot PD}{AD},\frac {PB\cdot PE}{BE},\frac {PC\cdot PF}{CF}\right]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/9/1/e913e1d07caa1967643da0e78ad160a5713a6e69.png)
Remark. In our particular case obtain
![$S=\frac{12}{6}\cdot \frac {12}{3}\cdot\frac {20}{5}\cdot\left[\frac {36}{12},\frac {27}{12},\frac {75}{20}\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/b/5/fb5adc65d1a5082821d0aee72cff5d1458b25d20.png)
![$2\cdot 4\cdot 4\cdot \left[3,\frac 94,\frac {15}{4}\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/7/9/179e0a745c4fdb1fd1b68bc6109fed6bb501b05b.png)
![$2\cdot 4\cdot 4\cdot \left(\frac {3}{4}\right)^2\cdot\left[4,3,5\right]=18\cdot 6=108$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/f/9/af9f00c690c3bf4ec4bc3155776045f8ef6bcdf0.png)
PP17. Let




![$[OK]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/1/0/61046e26949777d2ebee007816d02d3966fbe8e6.png)








Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.

![$[AS]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/1/f/81f842d87b22553e4b674bb2bf46a080da785009.png)








Remark. If the point






Directly. Suppose w.l.o.g.

![$[AS]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/1/f/81f842d87b22553e4b674bb2bf46a080da785009.png)













PP18. Let an acute


![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)




Proof 1 (synthetic). Let






that




Proof 2 (metric). Denote



obtain that







![$m_a^2-bc\cdot \cos A=\frac 14\cdot\left[2\left(b^2+c^2\right)-a^2-2\cdot \left(b^2+c^2-a^2\right)\right]=\frac {a^2}{4}=MB^2$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/b/f/cbfe99d1a20a9a2c70155143c5e35db74ecac4d0.png)
Proof 3 (metric).

![$[AH]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/3/b/03b8986ebe750b377f987f87b41a1dbc4c128e17.png)



Therefore,






This post has been edited 274 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Nov 18, 2015, 9:34 PM